儿子与情人
分析《儿子与情人》中的爱情与家庭关系
分析《儿子与情人》中的爱情与家庭关系简介《儿子与情人》是英国作家D.H. 劳伦斯的一部小说,出版于1913年。
这部小说以维尔斯家庭的故事为背景,探索了爱情和家庭关系在人们生活中的作用和影响。
本文将从几个方面分析《儿子与情人》中的爱情与家庭关系。
1. 主要角色•保罗· 恩菲尔德:主人公,一个有艺术才华却受困于母亲和社会压力的年轻男子。
•杜弗尼· 叶舍尔:保罗的母亲,非常依赖自己的儿子,并试图满足自己对爱和热情的渴望。
•米尔德里德· 尤金:保罗遇到的一位年轻富有、追求物质享受且不愿正视感情问题的女性。
2. 爱情与家庭关系之间的冲突在《儿子与情人》中,爱情与家庭关系之间存在着明显的冲突。
杜弗尼母亲对保罗的无条件依赖和控制,使得他无法追求自己真正的爱情与幸福。
在这一过程中,保罗陷入了矛盾和挣扎:他既希望满足母亲的期望,又渴望找到属于自己的真爱。
3. 爱情与家庭关系之间的影响在小说中,爱情和家庭关系对角色们产生深远的影响。
杜弗尼母亲试图通过佔有儿子来寻求爱和满足,却没有考虑到保罗拥有自己独立的情感需求。
同时,米尔德里德作为典型的现代女性代表,她追求物质享受并不愿意真正直面感情问题。
这些复杂而纠结的关系最终导致了个人成长和幸福感上的困扰。
4. 小说揭示了现实生活中类似冲突和问题通过《儿子与情人》所呈现出来的爱情与家庭关系之间的冲突和影响,我们可以看到其中蕴含着一定程度上反映出真实生活中类似问题的因素。
家庭对个人情感发展的影响以及爱情与物质追求之间的纠结和冲突,都是人们在现实生活中常常面临的困境。
结论《儿子与情人》通过描绘角色们复杂的爱情和家庭关系,深入探索了这些关系对个人成长和幸福感带来的积极和消极影响。
这部小说提醒我们要理解并平衡爱情和家庭之间的关系,更加注重个体情感需求的满足,以实现真正的幸福。
论劳伦斯《儿子与情人》的现代主义倾向
论劳伦斯《儿子与情人》的现代主义倾向一、本文概述Overview of this article《论劳伦斯《儿子与情人》的现代主义倾向》这篇文章旨在探讨英国作家D.H.劳伦斯的作品《儿子与情人》中所展现的现代主义文学特征。
通过对小说中主题、人物塑造、叙事手法和文学技巧的分析,本文旨在揭示劳伦斯如何在他的这部作品中反映出当时社会背景下人们内心世界的复杂性、矛盾性以及人与人之间关系的疏离与异化。
本文还将探讨劳伦斯如何运用现代主义手法,将传统的小说叙事与现代心理学、哲学思想相结合,从而构建出一个既真实又超现实的文学世界,为读者呈现出一个充满深刻思考的艺术作品。
The article "On the Modernist Tendency of Lawrence's Sons and Lovers" aims to explore the British writer D H. The modernist literary features depicted in Lawrence's work "Sons and Lovers". Through the analysis of the themes, character portrayal, narrative techniques, and literary techniques in the novel, this article aims to reveal how Lawrence reflects the complexity and contradictions of people's inner world inthe social context of that time, as well as the alienation and alienation of relationships between people in his work. This article will also explore how Lawrence employs modernist techniques to combine traditional novel narratives with modern psychology and philosophical ideas, in order to construct a literary world that is both real and surreal, presenting readers with a deeply thought-provoking artwork.本文将首先简要介绍劳伦斯及其作品《儿子与情人》的基本情况,包括作品的创作背景、主要情节和人物关系等。
《儿子与情人》中的家庭关系:分析角色之间的亲子关系的课堂讲解
儿子与情人中的家庭关系:分析角色之间的亲子关系介绍《儿子与情人》是一部由法国作家让-克里斯托夫·罗曼创作的小说。
小说以一个家庭为背景,讲述了主要角色之间复杂而纠结的亲子关系。
本文将通过对角色进行分析,探讨这些亲子关系在小说中的具体表现和影响。
主要角色1. 父亲 (约瑟夫)父亲是这个家庭的重要支柱,他被描述为有权威、严厉但又温和的人物。
他在家庭中扮演着传统的家长角色,担负起经济责任和保护全家的责任。
2. 母亲 (艾琳)母亲在小说中是一个深感不满和受压迫的角色。
她受到约瑟夫及其严格传统观念的限制,并被迫丧失自我实现和表达自我的能力。
3. 儿子 (朱利安)朱利安是这个家庭最年轻、最无助同时也最懵懂无知的角色。
他在小说中被描绘为一个渴望被理解和关注的孩子,同时也受到了父亲严格的教养方式造成的压力。
4. 情人 (凯瑟琳)凯瑟琳是儿子与情人之间不寻常关系的核心。
她代表了新鲜、自由、个性和独立,成为儿子从家庭压抑中寻求自我救赎的重要力量。
亲子关系分析1. 父亲与母亲之间的关系父亲对母亲采取专制式控制,使得母亲感到无法真正发挥自己的能力和个性。
这导致了两人之间紧张和冷漠的关系,并进一步影响了整个家庭氛围。
2. 父母与儿子之间的关系父亲对朱利安施加严苛但爱护有加的教育方式,希望他能够成为一个合乎传统观念的成功者。
然而,在这样的约束下,朱利安感到自己无法真正发展和独立。
他试图通过与情人建立联系来逃避束缚。
3. 母亲与儿子之间的关系母亲对朱利安采取溺爱和过度保护的方式。
这使得朱利安产生了依赖性,同时也阻碍了他在成长过程中自我认知和自理能力的培养。
4. 儿子与情人之间的关系朱利安通过与凯瑟琳建立特殊的情感纽带来满足自己内心对父母无法提供的需求。
凯瑟琳代表了他心灵中渴望的自由、个性和独立,而这种关系给予了朱利安一种解脱和重新审视家庭关系的机会。
结论《儿子与情人》通过描绘角色之间复杂交织的亲子关系,深入探讨了家庭动态和其对个体成长发展产生的重要影响。
《儿子与情人》读后感
《儿子与情人》是英国作家D.H.劳伦斯的一部半自传体小说,讲述了主人公保罗·莫瑞尔的成长经历和他与母亲、家人以及女友之间复杂的关系。
读完这部作品,我被劳伦斯对人物心理和情感的细腻描写所打动,同时对家庭、爱情和自我认同等主题有了更深的思考。
小说中的保罗·莫瑞尔是一个敏感、矛盾的人物。
他在成长过程中,既受到母亲的过度保护,又对母亲充满了依赖。
他与母亲之间的关系超越了正常的母子关系,呈现出一种特殊的情感纽带。
这种关系在一定程度上影响了他与外界的关系,尤其是与女友米丽亚姆和克拉拉的关系。
劳伦斯通过保罗的故事,探讨了家庭对个体成长的影响,以及个体在成长过程中对家庭、爱情和自我认同的挣扎。
保罗的内心世界充满了矛盾和挣扎,他对母亲的依赖和爱情的需求,以及他对自我认同的探索,都让我对他产生了深深的同情和理解。
小说中的其他人物也各有特色,每个角色都有自己的故事和命运。
特别是米丽亚姆和克拉拉,她们各自对保罗的爱和影响,以及她们在与保罗的关系中的挣扎,都让我对她们的内心世界产生了深深的同情和理解。
《儿子与情人》赏析
《儿子与情人》赏析一床前明月光,疑是地上霜;举头望明月,低头思故乡。
这是多少人童年时代背诵过、津津有味地品味过的一首古典诗歌。
在中国文学中,以描绘月亮的诗歌,尤为广泛。
而其中,鲁迅的《儿子与情人》则将月亮与家庭、亲情结合,以故事的方式展示出情感的复杂性和家庭的现实面貌。
二故事的背景发生在上世纪二三十年代的中国乡村。
儿子是一个年轻的小伙子,他个性开朗、阳光。
而他的情人则是一个已婚妇女,岁月已经留下了深深的痕迹,她虽然没有美丽的外表,却有一颗深情的心。
这种曲高和寡的爱情注定是会引起众人的眼光和非议的。
三儿子与情人的故事,似乎只是在一段浓烈的爱情,但在儿子的内心,这种感情却源远流长。
在诗歌中,儿子常常会想起自己无法实现对情人的承诺,因为她有一个家庭,有一个已婚的丈夫。
尽管两人彼此深爱,但他们的关系在社会伦理中并不能被认同。
这种矛盾使儿子痛苦不已,他时常抬头仰望明月,陷入对家庭、对情人的思考之中。
四诗歌中,明亮的月光照亮了儿子的内心世界,也映照出社会道德的束缚。
同时,月亮也象征着儿子对故乡的怀念和对情人的思念。
诗歌最后一句“低头思故乡”,道出了儿子心中最深沉的情感。
他在追寻爱情的同时,也无法忘却自己的家庭和故土。
五这首诗歌中,通过儿子与情人的关系,展示了社会和道德对个人的束缚。
儿子和情人并没有追求自己的幸福,而是承受着心灵的煎熬和无尽的思念。
他们之间的纠结和矛盾,并没有获得圆满的解决,从而使诗歌更具深度和张力。
六作为一位伟大的现代文学家,鲁迅通过《儿子与情人》这首诗歌,以深刻的洞察力和敏锐的触觉,刻画了人性的复杂性和社会的阻碍。
诗歌中的每一句话,都透露出浓烈的情感和内心的挣扎。
通过对月亮的描绘和对家庭、情人的思考,鲁迅让读者感悟到了生活的现实和爱情的无奈。
七总之,鲁迅的《儿子与情人》是一首充满深意和诗意的诗歌。
通过描述儿子与情人之间的复杂关系,反映了社会道德对于个人情感的束缚。
诗歌中的月亮象征着家庭和归乡的思念,同时也承载着儿子与情人之间情感的交流和挣扎。
儿子与情人读后感
儿子与情人读后感【导语】下面就是作者给大家带来的儿子与情人读后感(共15篇),希望大家喜欢,可以帮助到有需要的朋友!篇1:《儿子与情人》读后感《儿子与情人》是英国作家劳伦斯的第一部长篇小说。
小说中的父亲莫雷尔是一名矿工,遇到其妻子两人相爱并结婚,但婚后不久,由于长期的沉重劳动和煤井事故使他脾气暴躁,夫妇两人经常发生争吵,慢慢发觉原来两人之间的爱情只是昙花一现。
母亲开始将自己的全部感情都放在自己的孩子身上。
一开始,母亲最看好长子威廉,希望他能出人头地,但是威廉在去伦敦当律师的时候过度劳累致死。
大儿子去世后,莫雷尔太太则把全部希望寄予在小儿子保罗身上。
围绕着保罗的除了母爱,还有和米莉安、克拉拉的爱情,在恋爱的过程中,保罗因一直爱着自己的母亲而无法真正地爱上其他女人。
他和米莉安兴趣相投、渐渐擦出火花,然而米莉安想在精神上占据保罗使他喘不过气,莫雷尔太太也对她没有好感,保罗进退两难,最终放弃了米莉安。
和米莉安分手后,保罗又与克拉拉相恋,但两人之间的爱情不是灵魂的结合,只是肉体上的狂欢,短暂的激情过后注定要破灭。
母亲在保罗的身上倾注了太多母爱以至于这种感情变得畸形,一定程度上也在摧毁保罗,在母亲的影响下,保罗无法做出自己选择、走自己的道路,一直到母亲去世,他才挣脱束缚,真正长大。
小说除了描写这一畸形的感情,还批判了英国工业社会中的物质文明,强调人应坚持原始的本性。
篇2:儿子与情人读后感《儿子与情人》这本书是英国劳伦斯所作。
这是一部体现他自身经历的作品。
并与当时的社会背景有关。
这部作品中主人公之间的感情有些复杂。
莫瑞尔太太与丈夫婚后有段甜蜜的婚姻生活,但后来甜蜜感逐渐消逝。
莫瑞尔的脾气变坏,酗酒打人,变得行尸走肉。
莫瑞尔太太心灰意冷,本打算离开他,可是为了孩子还是留下来了。
她把所有的爱都倾注在儿子保罗身上,对于他的爱已经超出了单纯的亲情之情,已经把儿子当做情人一样的对待,儿子对母亲也很是依赖。
保罗长大之后,交了两个女友,由于母亲的阻拦和一些其他原因都分开了。
《儿子与情人》读后感
《儿子与情人》是D.H.劳伦斯的一部半自传体小说,首次出版于1913年。
这部作品讲述了主人公保罗·莫瑞尔的成长经历,以及他与母亲、家人以及女友之间复杂的关系。
小说以细腻的心理描写和对情感的深入探讨著称,是劳伦斯文学成就的代表之一。
小说中的保罗·莫瑞尔是一个敏感且有着强烈情感的人物。
他在成长过程中,与母亲米娜之间的关系异常紧密,这种关系在一定程度上影响了他与其他人的交往,尤其是与女友米丽亚姆和克拉拉的关系。
保罗对母亲的依赖以及他与女友之间的冲突和矛盾,构成了小说主要的情节线索。
劳伦斯通过保罗的故事,探讨了家庭对个体成长的影响,以及个体在成长过程中对家庭、爱情和自我认同的挣扎。
小说深刻地揭示了人性的复杂性,以及情感和欲望对人的驱使。
《儿子与情人》
儿子与情人1. 引言《儿子与情人》是一部讲述家庭关系和爱情的电影。
本文将以文学作品为背景,探讨其中的主题和情节。
这部电影深入描绘了家庭和爱情之间的复杂关系,引起了观众们对现代家庭动态的思考。
2. 情节概述主要角色介绍《儿子与情人》的主要角色包括: - 父亲:一个事业有成但感情生活不如意的中年男性。
- 儿子:一个青春期少年,正在探索自我身份和感情世界。
- 母亲:已经离世,但她出现在回忆和梦境中。
故事起因一天,父亲突然邀请一个年轻女性到家里做客,并声称她是他的新女友。
这个意外消息对于儿子来说是个巨大冲击,因为他从未见过父亲与其他女性交往。
家庭动态变化随着时间推移,父亲与新女友之间的关系逐渐加深。
他们开始共同生活,并且父亲表现出对新女友的爱意。
儿子对此感到困惑和挫折,并尝试寻求理解和接纳。
情感冲突和成长儿子开始展开探索,试图理解自己与情人之间的关系。
他逐渐意识到自己不能完全取代母亲的位置,同时也看到了父亲重新找到幸福的可能性。
这个过程中,他经历了情感冲突,并迈向了成长。
3. 主题分析家庭关系和亲情《儿子与情人》深入探讨了家庭关系的复杂性。
它揭示了一个失去母亲后的家庭如何重新调整、恢复、甚至重新建立连接。
同时也揭示了家庭成员之间的互动、角色转变和情感冲突。
爱情和无法取代性电影通过父亲与新女友的关系,探讨了爱情在个体生活中的重要性。
它表达了一个在失去伴侣后重建新感情关系所带来的希望和挑战。
同时也凸显了无论多么努力,我们都无法将一种爱完全取代另一种爱。
青春期和自我探索影片还强调了青春期少年在发现自己的身份和感情世界时面临的挑战。
儿子通过与父亲的冲突、观察父亲与新女友的相处和自己对情感的反思,逐渐成长为一个更加成熟和理解他人需求的个体。
4. 总结《儿子与情人》通过深入描绘家庭关系和爱情之间的复杂交织,引发观众对现代家庭动态以及爱如何改变我们生活方式的思考。
电影中塑造的角色形象和情节展示了情感冲突、家庭重建和个体成长等主题。
《儿子与情人》读后感
《儿子与情人》是英国作家D.H.劳伦斯的一部半自传体小说,讲述了主人公保罗·莫瑞尔成长过程中与母亲、姐姐以及女友米丽安之间的关系,展现了他在家庭、爱情和自我认同方面的挣扎。
阅读这部作品,我被劳伦斯对人物心理的细腻描绘和对人性深层次的探索所吸引,同时也对小说中所探讨的家庭、爱情、性别角色和艺术创作等主题进行了深入的思考。
小说中,保罗与母亲和姐姐之间的关系让我对家庭关系和情感依赖有了更深的认识。
保罗在母亲和姐姐的关爱下成长,这种过度的保护和依赖使他在成年后的人际关系中充满了矛盾和挣扎。
这让我对家庭对个人成长的影响以及情感依赖的边界有了新的思考。
此外,保罗与米丽安的爱情故事让我对爱情和性别角色有了深的理解。
他们的关系充满了控制与反控制、依赖与独立的冲突,这让我对爱情的复杂性和性别角色在关系中的作用有了更深的认识。
劳伦斯在《儿子与情人》中还探讨了艺术创作的主题。
保罗在艺术创作过程中对自我认同的探索,让我对艺术与个人身份的关系有了新的理解。
同时,劳伦斯通过对保罗绘画活动的描写,表达了艺术创作对于个人情感表达和精神独立的重要性。
儿子与情人翻译
Sons and lovers《儿子与情人》导读《儿子与情人》是英国作家劳伦斯的成名作。
小说叙述一个经典爱情故事。
书中的第一代是瓦尔特·莫雷尔和格特鲁德夫妇。
瓦尔特原本充满了活力,乐观、讨人喜欢;后来却脾气变坏,酗酒打人,对丈夫失望的妻子遂将希望寄托在儿子身上。
但是她钟爱的长子威廉不幸早夭,随之对次子保罗产生了强烈的感情。
而保罗的两个女朋友却有不同的爱情观,让他无所适从。
母亲去世后,保罗决定离开家乡,到城市去。
单词Wordserect [ɪ'rekt] vt. 使竖立;建造;安装vigorous /ˈvɪɡərəs/ adj. 有力的;精力充沛的animation /ˈænɪˈmeɪʃən/ n. 活泼,生气;激励;卡通片绘制grotesque /ɡrəʊˈtɛsk/ n. 奇异风格;怪异的东西adj. 奇形怪状的;Intellectual /ˈɪntɪˈlɛktʃʊəl/ adj. 智力的;聪明的;理智的subdued /səbˈdjuːd/ adj. 减弱的;被制服的;被抑制的ornament /ˈɔːnəmənt/ n. 装饰;[建][服装] 装饰物;教堂用品vt. 装饰,修饰candour /ˈkændə/ n. 正直,公正;直率;洁白refugee /ˈrɛfjʊˈdʒiː/ n. 难民,避难者;流亡者,逃亡者sensuous /ˈsɛnsjʊəs/ adj. 感觉上的,依感观的;诉诸美感的Words and EpressionsWhen she was twenty-three years old, she met, at a Christmas party, a young man from the Erewash Valley. Morel was then twenty-seven years old. He was well set-up, erect, and very smart. He had wavy black hair that shone again, and a vigorous black beard that had never been shaved. His cheeks were ruddy, and his red, moist mouth was noticeable because he laughed so often and so heartily. He had that rare thing, a rich, ringing laugh. Gertrude Coppard had watched him, fascinated. He was so full of colour and animation, his voice ran so easily into comic grotesque, he was so ready and so pleasant with everybody. Her own father had a rich fund of humour, but it was satiric. This man's was different: soft, non-intellectual, warm, a kind of gambolling.She herself was opposite. She had a curious, receptive mind which found much pleasure and amusement in listening to other folk. She was clever in leading folk to talk. She loved ideas, and was considered very intellectual. What she liked most of all was an argument on religion or philosophy or politics with some educated man. This she did not often enjoy. So she always had people tell her about themselves, finding her pleasure so.In her person she was rather small and delicate, with a large brow,and dropping bunches of brown silk curls. Her blue eyes were very straight, honest, and searching. She had the beautiful hands of the Coppards. Her dress was always subdued. She wore dark blue silk, with a peculiar silver chain of silver scallops. This, and a heavy brooch of twisted gold, was her only ornament. She was still perfectly intact, deeply religious, and full of beautiful candour.Walter Morel seemed melted away before her. She was to the miner that thing of mystery and fascination, a lady. When she spoke to him, it was with a southern pronunciation and a purity of English which thrilled him to hear. She watched him. He danced well, as if it were natural and joyous in him to dance. His grandfather was a French refugee who had married an English barmaid--if it had been a marriage. Gertrude Coppard watched the young miner as he danced, a certain subtle exultation like glamour in his movement, and his face the flower of his body, ruddy, with tumbled black hair, and laughing alike whatever partner he bowed above. She thought him rather wonderful, never having met anyone like him. Her father was to her the type of all men. And George Coppard, proud in his bearing, handsome, and rather bitter; who preferred theology in reading, and who drew near in sympathy only to one man, the Apostle Paul; who was harsh in government, and in familiarity ironic; who ignored all sensuous pleasure:--he was very different from the miner. Gertrude herself was rather contemptuous of dancing; she had not theslightest inclination towards that accomplishment, and had never learned even aRoger de Coverley. She was puritan, like her father, high-minded, and really stern. Therefore the dusky, golden softness of this man's sensuous flame of life, that flowed off his flesh like the flame from a candle, not baffled and gripped into incandescence by thought and spirit as her life was, seemed to her something wonderful, beyond her.长难句解析Walter Morel seemed melted away before her. She was to the miner that thing of mystery and fascination,沃尔特莫雷尔似乎在她之前为她着迷,她对于矿工来说是神秘和充满吸引力的。
《儿子与情人》:戴维·赫伯特·劳伦斯的禁欲与情欲主题分析
儿子与情人:戴维·赫伯特·劳伦斯的禁欲与情欲主题分析1. 引言在戴维·赫伯特·劳伦斯的小说《儿子与情人》中,禁欲与情欲是重要的主题。
这部小说以加利福尼亚矿工之子保罗和他的母亲基里安为中心,讲述了他们之间错综复杂的关系以及他们各自面对禁欲和情欲的挣扎。
2. 禁欲主题分析禁欲在《儿子与情人》中体现在多个层面上。
首先,基里安作为一个已婚女性,她对于与保罗的感情有着内心的抗拒和压抑。
她试图摆脱母性角色,并希望能够实现自我满足。
此外,保罗也经历着对父权制度、道德规范以及社会期望的内心斗争。
他感到压抑和束缚,并试图摆脱这些桎梏来追求自己真正渴望的东西。
3. 情欲主题分析情欲在《儿子与情人》中扮演着重要角色。
基里安对于保罗既是母性的爱,又是激情的恋人。
他们之间有着禁忌的关系,但却又无法抗拒彼此的吸引力。
劳伦斯通过描写两者之间复杂的感情纠葛,探讨了禁忌之爱所带来的矛盾心理和冲突。
4. 禁欲与情欲之间的对比在《儿子与情人》中,禁欲与情欲形成鲜明对比。
禁欲代表着社会和道德束缚下抑制自我的一种状态,而情欲则象征着个体真实而强烈的渴望和欲望。
这两种力量之间的冲突使得角色们陷入内心纠结和混乱。
5. 结论通过分析《儿子与情人》这部小说中禁欲与情欲主题,我们可以看到戴维·赫伯特·劳伦斯在文学中对于个体自由、社会规范以及道德观念进行了深入探讨。
这部作品通过描绘角色的内心斗争,展现了禁欲与情欲之间的复杂关系,深入探索人性和情感。
劳伦斯以其独特的写作风格和透彻思考的观点,使得《儿子与情人》成为一部引人深思的文学经典。
以上是对《儿子与情人》中禁欲与情欲主题的简要分析。
在这部小说中,戴维·赫伯特·劳伦斯通过生动的角色塑造和丰富复杂的情节,成功地将禁欲与情欲交相辉映,从而让读者更好地理解个体内心挣扎和社会规范之间的冲突。
这个主题不仅代表了作品本身所要表达的意义,也蕴含着更深层次的哲学探索。
儿子与情人读后感
儿子与情人读后感《儿子与情人》是法国作家让-若尔瓦斯克创作的一部小说,通过讲述一个家庭的故事,展现了人类情感的复杂性和家庭关系的脆弱性。
这部小说以其细腻的描写和真实的人物形象吸引了我,引发了对爱、亲情和自由的深思。
故事的主人公是亨利,一个二十世纪初的法国人。
亨利与他的儿子皮埃尔之间建立了一种独特的感情。
小说通过亨利对皮埃尔一生的回忆,以及皮埃尔对父亲的思考和回忆,揭示了父子之间的关系。
在小说中,亨利被描绘为一个温柔、体贴和善于倾听的父亲。
他对皮埃尔的爱和关心是毫无保留的,他为儿子提供了身心的照顾和教育的指导。
尽管在圈子里他享有崇高的声望,但对于亨利来说,与儿子共度时光才是最快乐的时刻。
亨利和皮埃尔之间的关系是彼此理解、尊重和支持的真实写照。
然而,亨利与情人间的关系给了故事一种曲折的发展。
亨利与他的情人凡妮丝之间有着复杂的情感纠葛。
凡妮丝以她自由的个性和意想不到的行为方式吸引了亨利,引发了他对婚姻的质疑。
亨利为了与凡妮丝保持关系,开始躲避家庭的责任,并将夜晚留给了凡妮丝。
然而,他对皮埃尔的爱和家庭的牵挂使他感到内疚,无法完全放下家庭的责任。
这种矛盾的情感使他陷入困惑与痛苦之中。
小说通过对亨利情感的描写,探讨了个人自由与家庭责任之间的矛盾。
亨利试图追求个人欲望,但又为家庭的束缚所困扰。
他对皮埃尔的爱和对家庭的承诺让他感到矛盾和无奈。
通过这种写作手法,小说引发了我对个人自由和家庭责任之间的思考。
这本小说还通过凡妮丝的形象探讨了女性的自由与性别角色的局限。
凡妮丝是一个非常独立和有主见的女性,她不愿被传统家庭角色所束缚。
然而,她与亨利的关系受到了社会和道德观念的限制。
小说中的凡妮丝代表了那些试图摆脱传统的女性,但由于社会阻力而陷入困境的形象。
通过对凡妮丝的描写,小说引发了我对女性自由与社会期望之间关系的思考。
总的来说,通过《儿子与情人》这本小说的阅读,我对家庭关系、个人自由和性别角色有了更深入的思考。
小说以其真实的人物形象、细腻的描写和对复杂情感的揭示,给我留下了深刻的印象。
《儿子与情人》中的亲子关系剖析
儿子与情人:亲子关系剖析1. 引言《儿子与情人》是一部深具情感内涵的电影,通过讲述一个父亲、一个儿子和一位情人之间错综复杂的关系,展现了亲子关系中常见的问题和挑战。
本文将从几个关键角度来剖析这部电影中的亲子关系,揭示其中的主题和教导。
2. 父子关系的困扰在电影中,父亲和儿子之间存在着许多障碍和困扰。
首先,由于长时间的分离和沟通不畅,父亲对儿子缺乏理解和关心。
同时,父亲过分依赖他的情人并放弃了对儿子的责任感,导致他们之间的距离越来越远。
这种困扰使得父子之间产生了矛盾和冲突。
3. 母性缺失与情感寄托母性在人类社会中起着重要的作用,而在《儿子与情人》中,母性却被忽视或丧失了。
这使得儿子迫切地需要寻找情感寄托,他试图通过与父亲和情人的关系来满足这一需求。
然而,由于父亲对母性缺失的无视和情人对儿子关怀的程度不足,儿子的情感需求得不到充分满足,进而导致了他内心的孤独与困惑。
4. 爱与理解的重要性在《儿子与情人》中,重视爱与理解是一个显著主题。
尽管父亲未能给予儿子足够的关怀和理解,但最终通过面对自己过去行为的反思和改变,他开始注意到儿子内心深处真正需要的支持。
同时,在故事中我们也可以看到,在情人积极参与并努力融入家庭后,她所表达出来的关怀和理解对于儿子来说非常重要。
5. 持久负面影响电影向我们展示了当父母和孩子之间疏离发生并持续下去时可能带来的持久负面影响。
通过让观众感受到主角经历中逐渐打开、诉说、宽恕与接纳等过程,我们得以看到情感卸载与体验治愈的力量。
更重要的是,我们也意识到亲子关系对个人成长和心理健康有着重大影响。
6. 解决亲子关系问题的建议基于对《儿子与情人》中亲子关系剖析,我们可以给出一些解决亲子关系问题的建议: - 加强沟通:父母和孩子之间进行及时、真诚的沟通非常重要。
了解彼此的需求和期望可以帮助建立更紧密的互动关系。
- 增进理解:父母应该用心倾听孩子,并尊重他们的感受和想法。
同时,孩子们也应该试图理解并接受父母的观点。
儿子与情人简介
儿子与情人简介儿子与情人是一部由美国作家约翰·切佩尔于1962年出版的小说。
这部小说以幽默而犀利的笔触刻画了一个中年男子乔治·费纳尔在他生活中儿子和情人两个角色之间的抉择和挣扎。
故事背景设定在20世纪50年代的美国康涅狄格州一座小镇。
乔治·费纳尔是一名大学教授,他身处于人生的困境中。
在他婚姻走到尽头、和妻子离婚之后,他自由自在地享受着单身生活,追求着自己的理想和事业。
然而,一场意外的相遇改变了乔治的一切。
在一次社交聚会上,他遇到了一位年轻而美丽的女性,她名叫桑德拉。
桑德拉是一个充满活力和野心的女人,她吸引了乔治的注意力,两人很快相互吸引,展开了一段奇妙而禁忌的恋情。
与此同时,乔治还有一个在他生活中占据重要位置的儿子,他的名字叫汤米。
汤米是一个聪明而有才华的年轻人,对父亲的一举一动都抱有极大的期待。
尽管乔治也爱他的儿子,但他的注意力却越来越多地投入到和桑德拉的关系中。
乔治陷入了一个两难的抉择,他既想保持和桑德拉的关系,又不愿辜负自己儿子的期望。
他开始尝试在两者之间平衡,但结果却是越来越不美好。
他渐渐发现,双方的关系逐渐紧张和脆弱,他陷入了痛苦和困惑之中。
在小说的高潮部分,乔治被迫做出一个艰难的选择。
他意识到他不能再继续两者兼顾,他必须做出一个决定。
这个决定将会带来巨大的后果,无论是对他自己还是对他身边的人。
儿子与情人是一部情感细腻而引人深思的小说。
通过对乔治的内心世界和情感困境的描写,作者勾勒出一个现实而令人动容的故事。
小说中的人物形象鲜活而真实,他们的情感纠葛也触及到读者内心的柔软之处。
这部小说非常巧妙地探讨了爱情、家庭、责任等主题。
通过乔治的故事,我们看到了一个普遍的人性困境:追求自我与承担责任之间的冲突。
作者以幽默且深沉的笔调揭示了现代人在情感和道德选择面前的挣扎和迷茫。
总之,儿子与情人是一部深情而引人思考的小说,它通过一个男人的故事揭示了人类情感中的复杂性和矛盾性。
《儿子与情人》:禁忌之爱的恋曲
儿子与情人:禁忌之爱的恋曲引言《儿子与情人》是一部引人深思的电影,讲述了儿子和母亲的禁忌之恋。
这种主题在电影和文学中并不常见,因此引起了广泛的关注和讨论。
本文将从多个角度探讨这一禁忌之爱的恋曲。
剧情梗概电影《儿子与情人》讲述了一个复杂而扑朔迷离的故事。
男主角约翰是一个富有才华且少年气息未褪尽的作家,他对母亲安妮心存敬爱和依赖之情。
然而,在某种机缘下,约翰渐渐发现自己对母亲有着超越常规关系的感情。
禁忌之爱母子关系与性心理母子关系是每个人生命中最早建立的关系之一,在成长过程中对个体产生重要影响。
然而,当这种关系超越亲情界限时,就会引发伦理和道德上的困扰。
社会反应与观众回应由于这种禁忌之恋与社会规范相悖,观众对这类题材的接受度往往各不相同。
有些观众可能感到震惊和愤怒,认为这种关系是道德沦丧的表现,而另一些观众则可能更加关注角色的心理状态和动机。
电影对禁忌之爱的处理《儿子与情人》以前卫而犀利的方式探索了禁忌之恋。
导演通过细腻的画面语言和情感表达,展示了约翰与母亲安妮之间复杂而纠结的感情。
观众在欣赏电影时会被引导思考道德、伦理和文化背景对个人感情选择的影响。
文学与艺术中的禁忌恋曲除了电影,《儿子与情人》这一主题在文学和艺术作品中也有所体现。
例如,许多小说、诗歌和戏剧作品都描绘了类似主题,如《奥德赛》、《哈姆雷特》等。
禁忌之爱与心理学心理学家常常研究个体发展中涉及家庭和亲密关系的问题。
禁忌之恋在心理学中被视为一种复杂而令人困惑的情感状态,具有独特而深远的心理影响。
总结《儿子与情人》这部电影勇敢地探讨了禁忌之爱的主题,引发了公众对这类题材的思考和讨论。
通过探索母子关系、社会反应、艺术表达和心理学等多个角度,我们可以更好地理解禁忌之恋的复杂性和影响。
劳伦斯《儿子与情人》主要内容概要及赏析
劳伦斯《儿子与情人》主要内容概要及赏析(最新版)编制人:__________________审核人:__________________审批人:__________________编制单位:__________________编制时间:____年____月____日序言下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文,如诗歌散文、原文赏析、读书笔记、经典名著、古典文学、网络文学、经典语录、童话故事、心得体会、其他范文等等,想了解不同范文格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor.I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as poetry and prose, original text appreciation, reading notes, classic works, classical literature, online literature, classic quotations, fairy tales, experience, other sample essays, etc. if you want to know the difference Please pay attention to the format and writing of the sample essay!劳伦斯《儿子与情人》主要内容概要及赏析【导语】:《儿子与情人》外国文学作品简析英国小说家劳伦斯(18851930)的长篇小说。
儿子与情人家庭纷争
儿子与情人家庭纷争儿子与情人之间的纷争是一种常见的家庭问题,它可能对家庭成员产生负面影响,甚至对家庭关系造成破裂。
本文将探讨该问题的根源、影响以及解决方法。
家庭是每个人情感的归宿,由父母和子女组成。
然而,在一些情况下,儿子与父母的关系可能会受到情人的介入而变得紧张。
这种情况通常发生在儿子开始谈恋爱或结婚后。
他们的情感需求可能开始转向新伴侣,而忽略了父母的情感需求,这可能会导致冲突和纷争。
首先,这种纷争可能会对家庭成员产生负面影响。
父母可能会感到被忽视和被取代的情绪,因为儿子将更多的关注和时间投入到与情人的关系中。
他们可能开始感到孤单和被遗弃,这对他们的心理健康产生不利影响。
同时,儿子与父母之间的沟通也变得困难,这可能导致长期的亲子关系障碍。
其次,这种纷争可能对家庭关系造成破裂。
父母可能感到愤怒和不满,进而对儿子和情人产生敌意。
他们可能试图干涉儿子与情人的关系,这可能引发更多的冲突。
如果不及时解决,家庭关系可能逐渐疏远,最终导致亲子关系的破裂。
解决这一问题的关键在于建立和谐的家庭氛围和有效的沟通。
以下是一些建议:首先,儿子应意识到他的情感需求并寻求平衡。
他应该明确自己的责任是同时关注父母和伴侣,并找到合适的时间和方式来满足不同关系的需求。
例如,可以定期与父母共进晚餐或安排一起旅行的时间,以保持亲子关系的紧密。
其次,父母也需要理解和尊重儿子的个人生活。
他们可以试着接受并欢迎儿子的伴侣,积极支持他们的关系发展。
同时,他们也应该保持自己的生活和兴趣,以保持情感的平衡。
家庭成员之间的沟通是解决这种纷争的关键。
儿子、父母和情人之间应该坦诚地交流彼此的感受和需求。
每个人都应该尝试理解对方的立场,并寻求妥协和解决方案。
此外,参加家庭治疗或咨询可能有助于改善沟通和解决冲突的能力。
总之,儿子与情人家庭纷争是一个常见但也可以解决的问题。
通过建立和谐的家庭氛围、平衡的关系以及有效的沟通,可以促进家庭成员之间的理解和互相支持。
儿子与情人读后感500字
儿子与情人读后感作文
仅仅用了两三天,我便读完了《儿子与情人》这本书,感觉写得相当不错,读完后却发觉自己难以入眠。
故事从莫雷尔夫妇的相识说起,述说了他们之后充满矛盾的婚姻生活,讲述了莫雷尔夫人大儿子威廉的人生经历以及他最终的离世,还讲述了二儿子保罗的成长历程以及他与母亲之间那特殊的情感羁绊。
保罗大概算是书中的主角了,毕竟后半部分内容全是围绕他展开的。
他有一位深爱他的女友,可他却无法毫无保留地去爱她;与此同时,他的母亲对他的女友极为反对。
后来保罗为了另一个女人离开了女友,然而他也没能真正爱上这个女人。
再后来莫雷尔夫人患上肿瘤,她自己饱受折磨,也让保罗和他的姐姐安妮苦不堪言。
于是在保罗的主导下,他们给母亲服用了大量吗啡,送走了母亲。
可母亲走后,保罗仿佛失去了生活的意义。
就在这时,他的前女友愿意与他成婚,试图挽救他的生命。
但他依旧无法彻底摆脱母亲对他的影响。
最终他在纠结与痛苦中迈向了大城市的生活。
我认为这部小说描绘出了英国工业革命时期一个普通矿工家庭
的生活百态。
从文学创作的角度看,劳伦斯在人物塑造方面极为出色,每个人物的言行举止都与各自的性格特点高度契合。
他的叙述风格较为平淡,如涓涓细流般缓缓流淌。
所以阅读过程中并没有让我产生特
别激动的情绪或留下极为深刻的印象。
儿子与情人现实意义和启示
儿子与情人现实意义和启示摘要:一、引言1.介绍儿子与情人这本书2.阐述现实意义和启示的主题二、儿子与情人的故事梗概1.故事背景及主要人物2.故事情节概述三、现实意义1.对家庭关系的启示1.亲情的重要性2.父母与子女之间的沟通与理解2.对爱情观的启示1.真正的爱情需要包容与信任2.爱情与亲情的关系四、启示1.如何处理家庭关系1.增进沟通,理解彼此2.学会包容与谅解2.如何看待爱情1.珍惜眼前的感情2.正确处理爱情与亲情的关系五、结论1.总结儿子与情人的现实意义和启示2.强调在现实生活中应用这些启示的重要性正文:一、引言《儿子与情人》是英国作家wrence 的一部著名小说,通过描述主人公保罗与他的母亲以及他的妻子之间的复杂关系,探讨了家庭、爱情等主题。
本文将分析这部作品在现实生活中的意义和启示。
二、儿子与情人的故事梗概《儿子与情人》的故事背景设定在20 世纪初的英国,主要讲述了主人公保罗从童年到成年的成长经历。
保罗与母亲关系亲密,但这种过度依赖导致了他与妻子米尔德丽德的感情出现问题。
在经历了一系列家庭纷争后,保罗最终意识到自己应该独立,摆脱对母亲的依赖,重新开始新的生活。
三、现实意义《儿子与情人》对家庭关系和爱情观的启示非常深刻。
首先,作品强调了亲情的重要性,提醒我们要珍惜与家人相处的时光,关心彼此。
同时,作品也揭示了父母与子女之间沟通与理解的重要性,要学会倾听彼此的心声,消除代沟。
其次,在对待爱情方面,《儿子与情人》提醒我们,真正的爱情需要包容与信任,不能因为一时的冲动而破坏彼此的感情。
同时,作品也探讨了爱情与亲情的关系,让我们明白两者之间的界限与平衡。
四、启示《儿子与情人》带给我们的启示主要体现在如何处理家庭关系和如何看待爱情两个方面。
在处理家庭关系方面,我们应该增进沟通,理解彼此,学会包容与谅解,这样才能创造一个和谐的家庭环境。
在看待爱情方面,我们要珍惜眼前的感情,正确处理爱情与亲情的关系,这样才能拥有稳定而美满的婚姻生活。
《儿子与情人》中的家庭关系与性别角色
儿子与情人:家庭关系与性别角色概览《儿子与情人》是一部由雨果·克洛塔尔斯基执导的法国电影,在剧情中描绘了一个复杂而引人深思的家庭关系以及围绕着性别角色的探讨。
本文将从家庭关系、性别角色分工以及社会背景等方面为您呈现该影片的详细内容。
家庭关系的错综复杂性影片中,主要展示了一个特殊的家庭构成:单亲父亲路易(Louis)和他的两个儿子——17岁尚未成年的舒拉尔(Laurent)以及不久前从监狱释放出来、脾气暴躁的安德鲁(André)。
这种家庭组合促发了许多家庭关系上的挑战和冲突。
首先,单亲父亲路易在经济和家务方面承担了巨大的压力。
他需要同时担任父亲和母亲的角色,照顾孩子们的生活琐事、教育问题以及心理需求。
在片中,我们可以看到路易努力平衡工作与家庭的矛盾,同时还要管理儿子们之间的不和谐关系。
其次,舒拉尔和安德鲁之间的相处也存在着许多挑战。
他们在年龄上相差较大,性格和兴趣爱好也有很大差异。
片中展示了兄弟间的摩擦、争斗以及努力去寻找彼此认同感的过程。
这种兄弟关系的复杂性为整个故事增添了一层张力。
最后,在影片中出现了路易与自己难以忘怀情人对面再续前缘的情节。
这位情人,一个已经结婚并且是另一个家庭的母亲,使得影片中关于家庭关系和情感纠葛更加扑朔迷离。
性别角色分工与社会背景《儿子与情人》通过展示主要角色对性别角色分工和传统社会期望的反思,引起了观众对于性别角色在家庭中如何演变的思考。
首先值得注意的是路易作为单亲父亲所面临的困境。
在传统观念中,男性更常被期望扮演赚钱养家、外出工作的角色,而女性则被视为负责照顾孩子和家庭的人。
然而,在这部电影中,路易要同时扮演父亲和母亲的角色,他不得不适应并接受这种非传统的分工方式。
其次是对安德鲁这一反社会行为的塑造。
他在电影开始时从监狱释放出来,在与父亲和兄弟相处期间呈现出一些挑战性和另类观念。
安德鲁的性格特点代表了无视常规社会期望、追求自由以及与传统性别角色刻板印象相悖的一面。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
西南大学育才学院本科毕业论文Oedipus complex of son and loves学院外国语学院专业英语年级2008级学号2008108115姓名李春羲指导教师刘朝汉成绩二○一二年五月Thesis: Son and Lovers reveals to us that how Mother Fixation injures the body and soul of people.Ⅰ. The information about D.H. LawrenceA. background of the authorB. Mother Fixation of the authorⅡ. Sons and LoversA. Main Contents of Sons and LoversB. Mother FixationⅢ. The Understanding of Mother FixationA. The Origin of Mother FixationB. The essence of Mother FixationC. The form of Mother FixationⅣ. ConclusionD.H. Lawrence was born in a broken family: he was deep feeling with his mother which was different from normal one. Before 1913 Lawrence was fell in love with a woman who was older than him. His work Sons and lovers is based on his life experiences have written. The hero Paul Morel was born in broken family. He was deep feeling with his mother which was different from normal one. This abnormal love influenced his whole life, influenced his twice relationships. Paul fell in love with Miriam, but they broken up at last bec ause Paul could not bear Miriam’s love, Miriam wanted to control Paul. The second woman in Paul’s life was Clara who was a married woman. The love also ended not long. Because of conflicts, Mrs. Morel was exhausted and she died at the end. From then on, Paul got rid of the shackles of his mother and led an independent life. Sons and Lovers, is a specific evidence of the Oedipus complex. Freud introduced the term “Oedipus complex” also called “Mother fixation” according to the Ancient Greece and Rome mythology in which Oedipus who killed his father and married his mother. After introducing the form and influence of Mother Fixation, the most important is the influence of Mother Fixation, it reveals to us that how mother Fixation injure the body and soul of people.Oedipus complex of son and lovesD.H. Lawrence was born in miner’s family of England in 1885. His father was a totally illiterate miner and his mother was a primary school teacher who was born in a noble family was a woman of strong character and refinement. The broken marriage of D.H. Lawrenc e’s parents led to an unlucky family. Growing up in a poor and broken family, the young Lawrence was physically weak and full of illness. He had a deep feeling with his mother which was different from normal one. Lawrence was a literature genius that he started to publish his works from 1906. In 1913 his most great work Sons and Loves published and the novel aroused strong reverberates in the literature world which established his position in the literature history. In 1912, Lawrence got acquainted with wife of a professor, Frieda weekly, who was 6 years older than Lawrence, a mother of three children. Then, they fell in love with each other and eloped to German, from then on, they led a vagrant life until he died. In 1903, Lawrence died in the south of France. During his lifetime, Lawrence published lots of works, such as Woman in Love, Rainbow, Sons and Lovers and so on, which are loved far and wide in the world.In the 19th century of England, the people were divided into three stratums. They were the upper class, the middle class and the lower class. People from different classes had different goals and they were treated different. So that family of equal standing were regarded seriously. Lawrence’father, the miner of course from the lower stratum was ill iterated and choleric with a bad temper. He got acquainted with Lawrence’s mother, a primary school teacher who was from the middle class. The woman was very pride and she always complained that her husband was vulgar person without any ambition and regretted that it was miserable to marry him. The unlucky marriage was born which was the basis factor of abnormal love. The arrogant woman put much attention to her son that she wanted to realize her dream to be the upper class. Lawrence was her psychological dependence. The son of the miner’s family grew up under the shelter of his mother, and engendered the abnormal love which was different from the common human emotion. After the death of his mother, Lawrence terminated the engagement with his fiancé. No soon later, Lawrence got acquainted with Fried Weekly and fell in love with her. At last, Lawrence and Fried Weekly eloped, which was regarded as the strong evidence of Mother Complex under Lawrence because Frieda, the wife of a professor and a mother of three children who was 6 years older than Lawrence and made up for the Mother Fixation of Lawrence. Such love was reviled by people because it had distorted the moral love.Paul Morel was born in a miner’s family that his father Mr. Morel was a totallyilliterate miner and his mother Gertrude was primary school teacher who was born in a good old burgher family, famous independents who had fought with Colonel Hutchinson, and, who remained stout congregation lists. Moreland Gertrude got acquainted at a dancing party, sooner they fell in love with each other and got married. But their marriage was a failure. Quarrels between the young couple never stopped because of different temperaments and behavior habits. More was a rough man without any ambition and Gertrude was an elegant and honorable woman with a great ambition that was the origin of their failure marriage. Gradually, poverty and discord was the theme of the family. William, Paul, older brother was a bright and capable boy and he got a job in England, became the economic prop of the family. Unluckily, the young man had a mortal disease and died. The younger brother of Paul, Arthur was a playboy that did not engage in honest work and joined the army without any thinking. Paul, the only boy at home, became the only hope of his mother, Gertrude. She tried her best to raised him and hope that one day he could get rid of poverty of miners and made up for her failure marriage. Paul did not disappoint his mother that he won credit for her. His drawing did not only win the prize but also sold for a good price. All of these he did was to please his mother and made her proud. The first girl fell in love with Paul was Miriam who was from the willey Farm. They held the common in goals especially in literature and painting. They really matched well. Unfortunately, the love did not last long. Their date was interfered with by his mother because she was afraid of losing his son. Paul realized that his faithful love belonged to his mother. When he knew that the date with Miriam had hurt his mother he regretted his behavior and could not bear, so that he decided to separate from Mi riam. The second woman in Paul’s life was Clara who was a married woman. Because of not getting along with his husband, Clara separated with her husband with a legal divorce. Clara was a wildly enthusiastic and sexy woman that Paul was attracted by her fascinatio n. However, the emotion in Paul’s heart, however, belongs to his mother. The people he loved most was his mother not the sexy woman. The love also ended not long. The love of Paul and his mother became mother complex from the love between mothers and sons. Because of endless conflicts, Mrs. Morel was mentally and physically exhausted that she died of tumor at the end. From then on, Paul got rid of the shackles of his mother and led in independent life.As we know, it is a tragedy for a woman to marry a wrong man, so was Gertrude. Because of a sudden passion, the girl, Gertrude from a rich and powerful family married the poor miner. When the passion disappeared she found the man was very rough and he could not be relied on. The endless quarrels made her dream broken that she lavished her love onher second son, Paul, after the death of the oldest son. There was so much hope on her that she wanted to control his son including behavior and soul, so that he would never turn the back on her and went with another girl. Once there were two girls appeared in Paul’s life, then the wars broke. The first war was between Gertrude and Miriam. Gertrude realized that Miriam was a formidable enemy who would deprive her son from her. As she knew his son had been in love with the girl who was every young and beautiful. The most important thing was that the boy and the girl found each other congenial and held the same idea in common, especially in the art world. They could communicate with each other in their minds, of which Gertrude could not do. So when Paul was late for home. Because of the data with Miriam, Mr. Morels was every angry and described Miriam as “one of those who will want to suck a man’s soul out till he had none of his own left.” Although she did not fight with Miriam directly, the war was very acute. She inflicted the pressure on her son and shrew her hate of Miriam and afraid of losing her son before Paul. That was a mental war. The pressure really made Paul mad because when his mother was upset he would fell remorse for her and tortured very much. Towards Miriam, she treated her coolly when Miriam came to visit her family sometimes; all the m embers and friends of the Morel’s family who followed Mrs. Morel kept distance from Miriam and isolated the girl. As to the obstruction, Miriam just sneered at Paul because she did no know why his mother disliked her and Paul just followed his mother. There was no doubt that Miriam would be defeated. Another war broke in Mrs. Morel and Clara. Mrs. Morel definitely knew that she would be the winner of the war because she was sure that her son would be tied of the Clara. After the first visit Clara to Paul’s family Morel Mrs. found that had something attracted to Paul. Clara was a passionate and sexy woman, of which was most attracted to Paul, a mature woman. But in Mrs. Morel’s mind, Clara could not keep the passion of Paul because she was a vulgar woman without deep thought that she could not master the soul of Paul and Paul should throw away his soul for this flippant traffic of triviality with Clara, even Clara had a husband. She was just waiting her son back. Clara herself al so realized this, although Paul’s mother treated her friendly but i t was cool in the old woman’s deep hart. She knew that they have to part sooner or later, even if they married, and were faithful to each other, still he would have to leave her, went on alone, and she would only have to attend to him when he came home. She could not master the hart of Paul bec ause she did not know that Paul’s hart belong to his mother not any other woman. Clara was the loser in the war.Gertrude, the pride woman who was from the rich and powerful family married the miner without thinking carefully. The dream of the young girl was to marry a good man,who was elegant, humors and enthusiastic with great ambition. So when she found that Morel was just the opposite her dream was broken and she looked for another people who would realize her dream. The death of her oldest son made her despaired until she rebuilt her hope on her second son, Paul, who won much credit for her. The life of Gertrude was full of sunshine and hope again. She tried her best to praise Paul to be a manly man. Her love just liked a chain locking on the neck of Paul. When Paul fell in love with Miriam Mrs. Morel obstructed the progress of the emotion because she did not allow any other woman to deprive her son from her. Mrs. Morel did not only control the behavior of Paul but also the m entalities of Paul that the boy’s hart only belong to his mother. In the novel, we can see that Paul deeply loved his mother that he obeys what his mother said and did what his mother wished him to. During his life, all he did were to please his mother. When he was a child, he walked all day, went miles and miles to look for blackberries which his mother liked, rather than own himself bea ten and came home to his mother’s empty handed. When he was away from home, he looked forward to get home earlier because he knew that his mother was alon e and waiting his back. In Paul’s eyes, his mother was an elegant, undisturbed and beautiful young girl. Every night, he would send his mother to bed and kissed her for good night. After the death of his older brother, William, his family ran into a predicament. The expenditure of the family was larger and larger while the family lived with the wage of 26 ponds of the miner, his father. In order to help his mother to manage the household, Paul got a job in Nottingham and offered his mother his wages. It was undutiful that Paul was a mourning son, but his main purpose was to help his mother. As to his father, he stood with his mother to be opposed to him, even he hated his father. When his father quarreled with his mother he even wanted to take the place of his father. He believed that his father mismatched his mother and there was no love in their marriage. Once he talked to Clara about love:“love is a dog in the man ger”. The situation just liked his parents, marriage because even if his mother did not love his father anymore or hated him extremely, their marriage still continued and his mother would never leave his father. His words hinted to us that Paul had regarded his father as his rival of love; also we can see that Paul replaced his father and protest his mother. The love of the son and the mother was blameless, but it gradually developed into a kind of abnormal love, mother Fixation. We can get the evidence from the novel, once a time, after quarreling with her husband, Mrs. Morel despaired and complained to his son that she never had a husband, a true husband. After hearing this, Paul detested his father very much even he wanted to kill his father, at the same time, he deeply realized that his mother did not only need a good son but also ahusband, and then he could not help touching the hair of his mother and kissing his mother’s neck, of which was the strong evidence of Mother Fixation. The abnormal love had affected Paul’s life and thought. Mrs. Morel became the core of his dream and life. His mothers interfered again and again in his love and scold Miriam. Paul was in a dilemma as to continue to get along with Miriam or separate from her. Once he thought that it would made his mother sad he was full of self-reproach and remorse. Finally, Paul decided to divorce from Miriam. Just as what Miriam said, Paul was a child, a four years old child that Paul did not have his own judgment of thought under the protection of his mother. What he did was to please his mother that once he went against his mother wished he would self-examine and mended his way. Though his second attachment without the direct interference of his mother, it gradually fizzled out because Paul could not concentrate himself on any other person except his mother. Once he said to Clara that he planted to go abroad with his mother and depended on e ach other from then on. In Paul’s mind, his mother was his companion in the future but not his lover, maybe there was no a love in his lifetime if his mother was still alive. When he got the truth that his mother had a tumor and was being died, the queer feeling went over him, as if the entire sunshine had gone out of him, and it was all shadow. When his mother died, Paul even wanted to go with his mother.In the novel, there were several complicated conflicts in the leading characters. As we knew, the novel was about the love between Gertrude and her son and Paul and his two lovers. The most prominent conflict was in Paul and his mother. With the complicated psychology, Paul had deep feeling with his mother. When his attachment with Miriam led to the objection of his mother, he regretted very much and could not help but obey his mother’s wishes. At the same time, the interference of his mother made him annoyed and detested and sometimes he would do something to hurt to his mother intentionally. Once he was late for home again because he had sent Miriam home and walked long distance, his mother was very angry and scold him. Paul responded that he was old enough to decide what he liked and do what he wanted to. He knew that his words hurt his mother but his hart was delighted because he vented his anger. Maybe it was a kind of reprisal for the controlling of his mother. Another example was that Paul’s mother complained that Paul was absorbed by Miriam and never let him a man. Paul told his mother that he liked to talk to Miriam. His mother could not understand why Paul could not talk to her. Paul said that they were at the same age and his mother was not so young that he could had his thoughts sifted through his mother’s mind and she was not his companionship. He knew that his response was the great revenge to his mother. The contradictable psychology came into theclimax. When he got the news that his mother had a tumor he was full of fear that he could not believed that his mother was leaving him. During the last life time of his mother Paul made his mother take an overdose of morphine which accelerated the death of his mother. Although his purpose was to accelerate the suffering of his mother, it was a vicious idea. He had been tied on to his mother died. So the death of his mother made him free. The abnormal love was inevitable crazy and it led to the abnormal psychology. The second conflict was in Paul and Miriam. Miriam was the first love of Paul and Miriam. Miriam was the first love of Paul and their emotion was innocent. Paul loved the girl but sometimes he hated her very much especially when their contact made his mother sad he would do something to raven to Miriam. When his friends and family disliked her and snubbed her, he stood with them. Once his mother and Clara had a vicious talk about Miriam he criticized them and paid his sympathy to Miriam. That was a complicated conflict. As to Clara, the passionate fasc inating woman interested Paul’s attention that he nearly got mad. His mother also treated her friendly, but Paul never belonged to the woman. His hart was only belong to his mother that he was not a complete man and he could not consent rated on other woman. He annoyed that Clara did not belong to him and loved him completely. How contradictable the abnormal man was. There was no winner at the end of the story. We also can definite that the novel ended with a tragedy. In the novel, the greatest loser was the elegant and arrogant woman Mrs. Morel because the saddest thing for a woman was to marry a wrong man. The broken marriage was her first failure. It was undoubted that Gertrude was loser of marriage. Of course, her husband Mr. Morel was also a loser of marriage and family. The death of the oldest son who won so much credit for her did not brought Mrs. Morel the tremendous will but the broken dream. Although she defeated Miriam and Clara in the wars, Mrs. Morel became mentally and physically exhausted and got a tumor and soon died after continuous confliction. It was the tragedy of Mrs. Morel. Because of interference and control of his mother Paul was deep in the wars of soul and sensory feeling that he could not own complete love and gave up his love at his body and mind were divided into two parts that his mind was fixed on his mother while his body with his lovers. It was undoubted that Paul was a loser of love. The most unlucky thing was that he lost his mother at last. Without his mother, Paul almost lost his goal and led a vagrant life abroad. Another loser was Miriam; the sensate girl was looked downed upon by her lover Paul and abandoned by him. The last loser was Clara, the married woman who had a broken marriage, was pensioned in love with Paul and could not escape from the love failure. At the end, Clara came back to her husband and recovered her life. All the failure was due tothe abnormal love, Mother Fixation. It had distorted the emotion of the mothers and sons and breached the moral principle of human being. It did not only harm the body and mind of a person but also destroyed the family. I think we should learn something from it and pursue normal love.Mother Fixation ( Mother Complex, also translated " Oedipus complex" ), refers to the son against father and love mother . This name comes from whose name is Oedipus in Greek mythology. The Theban king Layiesi received the tora warning: if he let his litter son Oedipus grown up, his throne would be threatened. So he ordered the hunter took his son and killed him. But the hunter could not bear to killed this lovely child so only abandoned the baby .Abandoned baby is discovered by a farmer and raised. Years later, Layiesi went on pilgrimage, in the road he met a young man and quarreled with the young man, and then Layiesi was killed by this young man. The young man was Oedipus. Oedipus solved the riddle of the sphinx. He became Thebes’s king and married with the queen whose name was IO Custer. Years later Thebes appeared pestilence and famine, people asked the Oracle, and knew the truth that Oedipus killed his father and married his mother. Finally, Oedipus dug his eyes, leaved Thebes and drifted. Freud put forward, the boy pursuit his mother in early time, he always wanted to occupy the position of his father, and always wanted to occupy his mother's love, this is called Oedipus complex. Freud believed that the Oedipus complex was an important factor to develop the individual personality, and he used to explain the origin of culture and society. According to Freud's theory, in early human development, father owned the sex demanding rights of his wife and daughter, then the son against father, killed and aet father. Because of the sin is great, the son felt depressed for his mother and his sister. The incest taboo and exogamy were appeared. The essence of Oedipus complex was similarity and complement. For example, the boy and his father were isotropic, because of similar, similar caused identification, the boy took his father for example, then he learnt his father, and imitated his father, his father's psychological characteristics and quality is absorbed by him, and he made it to become his own psychological characteristics. The boy and his mother are different genders, they can complement each other, learn from each other, depends on each other. This is the so-called love. Then, the basic interpersonal relationship was formed between the boy and his parents, this relationship can be summarize as" Oedipus imitation father and love mother ". There were some stages in Oedipus complex. First stage of the Oedipus complex appeared in three to six years old, second stage of Oedipus complex appeared in puberty, then the boy would not hate his father and love his mother any more, the other two elders would replace his parents, the elders could be hisparents’friends, could also be his teacher, could be famous historical figures or popular stars. Therefore, the boy becam e an adult, the Oedipus complex’s object became his younger peers, finally his younger peers would replace the two elders. At this time, the boy and other boys were formed friendship, and he would fall in love with a girl. Why the object of Oedipus complex were younger than before. This was the parents were not real object of the Oedipus Complex, the image of his parents was the object of Oedipus complex. The image of the bo y’s heart would not become old when he grown up. Therefore, the boy grown up, but the image of his heart would become more and more young than, and the object of the Oedipus complex also became more and more younger. There were two forms of Oedipus complex: cooperation and antagonism. They divided people into two groups, friends and enemies; the love was divided into two categories, the spirit of love and physical needs; they divided the woman into two categories, the goddess and whores; the men were divided into two categories, gentleman and lady-killer. The opinion about interpersonal relationship of People who had Oedipus complex was very extreme. Third Oedipus complex had two special forms. they were called" Antigone complex" and" Cain complex". " Antigone complex" was from the story about the theme of brother sister incest, and" Cain complex" was from the story about the theme of Compatriots killed . When the abnormal people got married and had children, the image of their parents was replaced by their children, at this time, they would love their daughter and imitate their son, not loved mother and imitated father any more. And this is the fourth of Oedipus complex. When the fourth of Oedipus complex was over, it was entered the fifth of Oedipus complex. Along with the fourth of the Oedipus complex end, the image of other children replaced his own sons and daughters.Oedipus complex would bring unfavorable effects to the male: the male who had Oedipus complex would not get on well with his wife; And the male would Lack his own idea to do anything, because he was very afraid to lose his mother’love , so his mother would help him to Make decisions, not by himself, because of depends on mother, the way of thinking and speech would very like female; the male who had Oedipus complex used to obtain, and did not know how to service for others. There are many ways to avoid Oedipus complex to appear: first, let him contact other family members; help him to find more friends, develop peer relationship; do not do many intimate actions like treat babyWork CitedBernard Knox. Oedipus the King. Pocket Press, 1994.Fan CunZ hong. History of English Literature [M]. Sichuan People’s Press,1983.A Modern Chinese-English Dictionary. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and ResearchPress,2003.Guo Qunying. British Literature [M]. Foreign Language Teaching and Education Press,2001./Wang Shouren. Selected Readings in British Literature [M]. Higher Education Press,2001. Brenda Maddox.有妇之夫—劳伦斯的生活[M].海邹伦,李传家,蔡曙光译.中央编译出版社,1999.D.H.Lawrence.Sons and Lovers.贺广贤注释,西安:世界图书出版西安公司,2005.巴金.寒夜.上海文艺出版社出版,2005.弗洛伊德.图腾与禁忌.文[M].良文化译,中央编译出版社,2005.弗洛伊德.精神分析引论[M].高觉敷译,商务印书馆,1984.基思?萨嘉.被禁止的作家--D.H.劳伦斯传[M].王增澄译,辽宁教育出版社,1998.诺埃尔.文学文本的精神分析[M].李红书译, 天津人民出版社,2004.张定全.新编简明英国文学史[M].上海外语教育出版社,2002.吴伟仁.英国文学史及选读[M].外语教学与研究出版社,1998.王佐良,祝玉,李品伟欧洲文化入门[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2004.摘要D.H.Lawrence 出生在一个破碎的家庭,他对他的母亲产生了一种非同寻常的情感。