ROHS2.0联络报告
ROHS_2.0相关内容
ROHS 2.0相关内容2011年7月1日，欧盟议会和理事会在欧盟官方公报上发布指令2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）以取代2002/95/EC 新指令将于20天后（即2011年7月21日）生效。
申请日期：2013年1月3日起指令2002/95/EC将会被废除，盟国必须于2013年1月2日前将指令2011/65/EU更新到当地法律。
在2002/95/EC规范外的且不受更新指令约束的产品，将可继续再市场上出售直至2019年7月22日，这将意味着经营组织可继续在欧盟市场上分销或使用产品做商业用途付费或免费。
2011/65/EU 主要内容概括如下：1.产品范围阐明了指令管控范围和相关定义，将管控产品范围扩大至除特殊豁免外的所有电子电气设备：—包括被2002/95/EC 豁免的第8类产品医疗设备、第9类产品监控设备；—第11类产品：不被1~10类产品涵盖的其他所有电子电气设备，包括线缆及其它零部件。
2.限制物质虽然并未增加新的限制物质，但选定4种有毒有害物质（HBCDD、DEHP、DBP和BBP）作为限制物质的候选。
3.CE标志要求将电子电气设备ROHS符合性纳入CE标志要求。
生产者在张贴CE标识时应确保产品符合ROHS并准备相应的声明和技术文档。
4.过渡期规定为使新纳入ROHS 2.0管控产品的生产商有充分时间来符合指令要求，ROHS 2.0为相关产品设定了管控过渡期。
—医疗设备和监控设备及其零部件自2014年7月22日起应符合ROHS2.0;—体外诊断医疗设备及其零部件自2016年7月22日起应符合ROHS2.0;—工业监控设备及其零部件自2017年7月22日起应符合ROHS2.0;—其它新纳入ROHS2.0管控的产品自2019年7月22日起应符合ROHS2.0;5.豁免机制采纳现有豁免条款并针对医疗和监控设备提出了20项新豁免，同时针对产品类别规定了不同的豁免最长有效期：—2002/95/EC原先管控的8大类产品和第11类产品的豁免有效期最长为5年；—而第8类和第9类产品豁免有效期最长为7年。
ROHS2.0区别联系
ROHS2.0与ROHS区别是什么RoHS指令要求于2006年7月1日起，禁止在欧盟市场销售含有铅、镉、汞、六价铬、多溴联苯、多溴联苯醚等六种有害物质的电子电气设备。
RoHS 2.0实际是RoHS指令的修正版，俗称RoHS2.0其主要内容如下：1. 将原先WEEE指令的附录I和IA新增为RoHS的两个附录；2. 自2014年1月1日到2017年1月1日，逐步将医疗设备和监控设备纳入RoHS的管制范围；3. 制造商需在产品上市销售之前制订EC符合性声明并加贴CE标志，且在电子电气产品上市之后，必须保留相关技术文件和EC符合性声明至少十年；4. 如果附录III中列举的物质(如HBCDD、DEHP、BBP和DBP等)因使用对人体健康或环境造成无法承受的危害，则将依据REACH法规第69至72条的规定进行评估，进一步将此物质列入附录IV的限用物质。
RoHS指令的最新发展欧洲议会环境委员会6月2日以55票同意、1票反对、2票弃权，通过了对《欧盟电器和电子有害物质指令》（RoHS2.0）进行修改的决议，相对于2002/95/EC指令具体修改内容如下：1.确定了产品范围，将医疗器械、监控器材纳入RoHS管控，并对其归入RoHS提出了阶段性步骤，对医疗器械和监控器材特别增加了20条豁免；医疗器械和监控设备的管控从2014 -1-1日开始，其中体外诊断医疗设备从2016-1-1日开始；工业监控设备从2017-1-1日开始；植入体内的医疗设备暂不作要求，2020年委员会进行审查。
2.修改了豁免程序，规定豁免的最长有效期为4年，最长有18个月的宽限期。
通过附加社会经济学标准批准某项豁免，要求申请人在申请豁免前分析替代品，将RoHS豁免与REAC H授权相适应。
3.建立了明确的市场监管。
4.拟增加4种限制物质，并与REACH的限制条款相适应。
这4种物质具体如下：(1)六溴环十二烷（HBCCD）(2) 邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)(3) 邻苯二甲酸苯基丁酯(BBP)(4)邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)同时新增一系列“电子电气产品中优先关注的有害物质”；这些物质可能对人体或环境造成危害。
Rohs2.0测试报告样本
《电子信息产品污染防治管理办法》规定，自2006年7月1日起，列入电子信息产品污染重点防治目录中的电子信息产品中不得含有铅、汞、镉、六价铬、聚合溴化联本醚和聚合溴化联本及其他有毒有害物质。
对于2006年7月1日以前的一段时间，要求电子信息产品制造商们实行有毒有害物质的减量化生产措施，并积极寻找可替代品。
同时，一个名为“电子信息产品污染防治标准工作组”的机构也已经开始筹备成立，该机构的主要任务是研究和建立符合中国国情的电子信息产品污染防治标准，开展与电子信息产品污染防治有关的标准研究和制定工作，特别是加快制定急需的材料、工艺、测试方法和实验方法的基础标准。
RoHS认证周期：七个工作日RoHS禁止有害物质的测试标准及方法（目前所用的测试方法是业界默认的方法，并非欧盟强制规定的）
今年针对非金属ROHS检测强制执行ROHS 2.0，也就是ROHS 10项检测，其中除了之前ROHS 6项中的铅，镉，汞，六价铬，多溴联本，多溴联本醚之外，还增加了邻苯二甲酸盐中的三项，和六溴环十二烷，一共增加了四项。
所以现在非金属检测ROHS 2.0的都是检测这10项，金属ROHS检测不变。
中国rohs2.0测试方法 -回复
中国rohs2.0测试方法-回复中国ROHS2.0测试方法ROHS（有害物质限制指令）是由欧盟制定的一项针对电子电气产品中有害物质的使用限制的法规。
ROHS2.0是对ROHS进行了修订，对于有害物质的限制要求更加严格。
在中国，所有销往欧盟市场的电子电气产品都必须遵守ROHS2.0指令。
本文将详细介绍中国ROHS2.0测试方法。
一、ROHS2.0测试范围ROHS2.0指令针对的有害物质包括铅（Pb）、汞（Hg）、镉（Cd）、六价铬（Cr6+）、多溴联苯（PBBs）和多溴二苯醚（PBDEs）。
测试的产品范围包括电气与电子设备、大型家用电器、交通工具、医疗设备、工具、玩具及儿童产品等。
二、ROHS2.0测试方法ROHS2.0测试方法主要包括两个方面，一是材料测试，二是成品测试。
1. 材料测试材料测试是对产品的材料进行分析和测试，以确定是否超过了ROHS2.0的有害物质限制要求。
（1）取样首先，从产品的各个部件（例如电子元件、线缆、塑料件等）中选择典型样品进行取样。
确保样品表示了整个产品中使用的不同类型材料。
（2）样品制备将取样得到的材料样品进行切割、粉碎等处理，以便后续的分析和测试。
（3）测试方法目前，常用的材料测试方法包括X射线荧光光谱分析（XRF）、原子吸收光谱分析（AAS）和火焰原子吸收光谱分析（FAAS）等。
这些方法能够准确测定材料中是否含有超过ROHS2.0要求的有害物质。
2. 成品测试成品测试是对整个产品进行测试，以确认产品是否符合ROHS2.0有害物质限制要求。
（1）取样从产品的不同批次或多个样品中进行取样。
取样时要保证取自产品各个部分，以确保整个产品都符合ROHS2.0要求。
（2）样品制备将取得的样品进行处理，如切割、粉碎等，以提供便于测试的样品。
（3）测试方法成品测试主要采用化学分析方法，例如高性能液相色谱（HPLC）、气相色谱（GC-MS）和液相色谱-串联质谱法（LC-MS/MS）等。
rohs 2.0
ROHS 2.01. 简介ROHS（Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive）是欧洲针对电子电气设备中限制使用有害物质的指令。
ROHS 2.0是对这一指令的修订和更新版本。
ROHS 2.0的目标是限制电子电气设备中使用的有害物质，以减少对健康和环境的潜在危害。
本文将介绍ROHS 2.0的主要内容和要求。
2. ROHS 2.0的要求2.1 有害物质限制列表ROHS 2.0指定了限制使用的有害物质列表，包括以下物质：•铅（Pb）•汞（Hg）•镉（Cd）•六价铬（Cr6+）•多溴联苯（PBB）•多溴二苯醚（PBDE）ROHS 2.0要求电子电气设备中这些物质的含量必须在特定限制值以下。
2.2 产品范围ROHS 2.0适用于在欧洲市场销售的所有电子电气设备。
这些设备包括但不限于：•大家用电器，如冰箱、洗衣机等•小家电，如吹风机、电饭煲等•信息技术设备，如电脑、手机等•手持工具和办公设备，如打印机、复印机等2.3 证明文件要求根据ROHS 2.0的要求，供应商必须提供一份符合要求的技术文件，包括以下内容：•ROHS合规声明•ROHS测试报告•ROHS符号的正确使用方法这些文件将用于证明产品符合ROHS 2.0的要求，以便在欧洲市场上销售。
3. ROHS 2.0的影响ROHS 2.0的实施对于生产和销售电子电气设备的企业有着重要的影响。
首先，企业需要评估其产品是否符合ROHS 2.0的要求。
如果产品中含有限制使用的物质，企业需要采取措施进行调整，以确保产品符合要求。
其次，企业需要建立符合ROHS 2.0要求的供应链管理体系。
这意味着企业需要与供应商合作，确保原材料和组件的供应商也符合ROHS 2.0的要求。
最后，企业需要建立符合ROHS 2.0要求的内部管理体系，确保产品的合规性并提供相应的证明文件。
4. 总结ROHS 2.0是欧洲针对电子电气设备中有害物质使用的限制指令的修订和更新版本。
新版RoHS2.0指令介绍及如何解读 RoHS检测报告
新版 RoHS 2.0 的重要含义 2011/65/EU
8
RoHS 2.0 与旧版RoHS主要区别 --- RoHS2 Vs RoHS1
CE 标识及配套支撑性技术文档的要求
CE marking and Technical Documentation Files (TDF) required to show RoHS2 compliance
Large-scale fixed installations Transportation (i.e. cars, trains, airplanes, etc… Non-road B2B )
mobile machinery (i.e. forklift)
Active implanted medical devices Photovoltaic panels (professionally installed) R&D equipment
www.interte k.co m
11
RoHS 2.0不管制的产品
RoHS2 – Exclusions
Military Equipment Equipment designed to be sent into space Large-scale
stationary industrial tools
2000chromateconversioncoatingszinccadmiumaluminiumzincalloyszincaluminiumalloystestmethods锌镉铝锌合金以及锌铝合金上铬酸盐涂层测试方法epa3060aalkalinedigestionhexavalentchromium六价铬的碱式消解法epa7196achromiumhexavalentcolorimetric六价铬比色法rohsiec62321主要包含的内容7gcms检测聚合物中的pbb和pbderohs筛选测试方法就是用能?散射x射线荧光光谱仪edxrf或波长散射x射线荧光光谱仪wdxrf装置对样品中目标物质进?初步半定?的一种测试手段运用多种分析方法来分析有机材??属材?无机非?属材?以及专用电子材?中受限物质的浓?iec62321rohsiec62321rohsiec62321rohsiec623218金属样品中无色及有色铬酸盐镀层中含六价铬的测试类似于iso36139显色法测试聚合物和电子元件中六价铬类似于usepa3060arohsiec62321104样品前处理1043微波消解类似于usepa305211423密闭体系的酸消解法类似于usepa3052rohsiec623211342王水消解类似usepa3050b1343微波消解类似usepa3052rohsastmf9632003icpaesaasen711994iso81241997icpaesaasrohsrohs测试报告的解读需要包含以下信息测试报告的唯一编号比如序列号或报告号而且每一页都有此编号页码也是报告的一部分可用来辨识报告的结束
ROHS2.0环保概述及最新动态
欧盟ROHS概述及动态（SUMMARY AND HOT NEWS OF EU ROHS）
RoHS发展历程
❖ 2003年2月13日 ：欧盟官方公报发布2002/95/EC ❖ 2005年8月19日 ：发布六大有害物质限值2005/618/EC ❖ 2005年10月15日：豁免条款2005/717/EC ❖ 2005年10月25日：豁免条款2005/747/EC ❖ 2006年7月1日 ：开始执行限制措施 ❖ 2006年4月28日 ：2006/310/EC ❖ 2006年10月14日：2006/690/EC；2006/691/EC； 2006/692/EC ❖ 2008年3月20日 ：2008/35/EC ❖ 2008年5月24日 ：2008/385/EC ❖ 2009年6月11日 ： 2009/443/EC ❖ 2010年2月26日 ： 2010/122/EU
SUMMARY & LATEST DEVELOPMENT OF ROHS
内容
➢1.欧盟ROHS概述及动态（SUMMARY AND HOT NEWS OF EU ROHS）
RoHS 的名词解释 RoHS的发展历程 RoHS管控的范围 RoHS管控物质介绍
➢2.欧盟RoHS指令——最新动向（ Hot News of EU RoHS ） 修訂的要點
种元素，在产品中特别是聚合物材料中通常以有机化合 的的形式存在。
有机卤素化合物分类举例
卤素危害:
在塑料等聚合物中添加卤素主要是用以提高燃 点，它比普通聚合物材料燃点高，太约在300℃， 燃烧时，会散发出卤化气体，迅速吸收氧气， 从而使火熄灭。但因为
1.卤素溶于水，在空气中与水汽结合会形成酸雨 2.塑料在注塑成型过程中，卤素会释放出卤化氢，腐蚀模具; 3.PCB板在（>200度）高温焊接 过程中也会释出溴化氢;
中国rohs2.0标示 sdoc -回复
中国rohs2.0标示sdoc -回复中国RoHS2.0标示SDOC（Supplier Declaration of Conformity）是指供应商自行声明符合中国RoHS2.0标准的文件。
RoHS2.0，即《限制使用某些有害物质指令》第二版，是对电子电气设备中使用的有害物质的限制要求。
SDOC是供应链中的重要文件，它提供了关于产品是否符合RoHS2.0要求的证明。
第一步：了解RoHS2.0标准的背景和目的RoHS2.0标准是为了限制使用在电子电气设备中的有害物质。
有害物质包括铅、汞、镉、六价铬、多溴联苯（PBB）和多溴二苯醚（PBDE）。
这些物质对人体健康和环境有潜在的危害，因此需要通过标准来限制它们的使用。
第二步：了解SDOC的定义和要求SDOC是供应商自行声明的文件，它证明供应商的产品符合RoHS2.0标准的要求。
SDOC通常包括以下内容：1. 供应商的基本信息，包括名称、地址和联系方式。
2. 产品的基本信息，包括型号、规格和供应商自行编码等。
3. 供应商的声明，证明产品符合RoHS2.0标准的要求。
4. 供应商的签名和日期。
第三步：了解SDOC的编制过程编制SDOC需要以下步骤：1. 了解RoHS2.0标准的具体要求，包括有害物质的限制和测试方法等。
2. 通过内部检测或第三方检测来确定产品是否符合RoHS2.0标准的要求。
3. 收集产品相关材料的测试报告和证明文件，包括材料验证报告和供应商声明等。
4. 编制SDOC文件，包括填写供应商信息、产品信息、供应商声明等内容。
5. 供应商的质量管理团队进行审核和确认，确保SDOC的准确性和可靠性。
6. 供应商签署SDOC并加盖公章，在文件上注明日期。
第四步：SDOC的使用和重要性SDOC是供应商在供应链中的重要文件，它的使用和重要性包括：1. 自证合规：供应商通过SDOC证明其产品符合RoHS2.0标准的要求，自证合规可以提高产品的市场竞争力。
欧盟ROHS2.0标准
欧盟ROHS2.0标准欧盟公报(OJ)发布RoHS2.0修订指令(EU)2015/863，欧盟RoHS2.0更新终于尘埃落定，由原来的六项管控物质：铅（Pb）、汞（Hg）、镉（Cd）、六价铬（Cr VI）、多溴联苯（PBB）、多溴二苯醚（PBDE），变为十项管控物质，新增邻苯二甲酸二（2-乙基己基）酯（DEHP）、邻苯二甲酸甲苯基丁酯（BBP）、邻苯二甲酸二丁基酯（DBP）、邻苯二甲酸二异丁酯（DIBP）（简称邻苯4P），此前曾在ROHS2.0中被优先列为评估物质的六溴环十二烷（HBCCD）未被正式列入限制物质清单。
该十项管控物质管控的限量均为0.1%和0.01%。
此修订指令发布后，欧盟各成员国需在2016年12月31日前将此指令转为各国的法规并执行。
且2019年7月22日起所有输欧电子电器产品(除医疗和监控设备)均需满足该限制要求,;2021年7月22日起，医疗设备(包括体外医疗设备)和监控设备(包括工业监控设备)也将纳入该管控范围。
此外，已属REACH附件XVII第51条邻苯管控的玩具产品将不受此指令中DEHP、BBP、DBP的管控。
指令编辑欧盟议会及欧盟委员会于2003年2月13日在其《公报》上发布了《废旧电子电气设备指令》（简称《WEEE指令》）和《电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质指令》（简称《RoHS指令》）《RoHS指令》和《WEEE指令》规定纳入有害物质限制管理和报废回收管理的有十大类102种产品，前七类产品都是我国主要的出口电器产品。
包括大型家用电器、小型家用电器、信息和通讯设备、消费类产品、照明设备、电器电子工具、玩具、休闲和运动设备、医用设备（被植入或被感染的产品除外）、监测和控制仪器、自动售卖机。
2008年12月3日，欧盟发布了WEEE指令（2002/96/EC）和RoHS指令（2002/95/EC）的修订提案。
本次提案的目的是创造更好的法规环境，即简单、易懂、有效和可执行的法规。
详解RoHS2
详解RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012一、引言介绍RoHS2.0以及协调标准EN50581：2012对于环境保护和产品质量安全的重要性，以及相关研究的意义。
二、RoHS2.0的概述1. RoHS2.0的背景和历史2. RoHS2.0涉及的范围和要求3. RoHS2.0与之前的RoHS1.0的区别和改进4. RoHS2.0对于环境保护和产品质量安全的影响和意义。
三、协调标准EN50581：2012的内容与作用1. 协调标准EN50581：2012的背景和历史2. 协调标准EN50581：2012的主要内容和标准化的范围3. 协调标准EN50581：2012与RoHS2.0的关联和作用4. 协调标准EN50581：2012对于环境保护和产品质量安全的贡献和影响。
四、实施RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012的挑战和解决方案1. 实施RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012的难点和影响因素2. 如何应对RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012的挑战3. 相关产业的合作，以圆满实现RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012的顺利实施。
五、结论与展望总结RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012的意义和作用，以及对未来发展的展望，探讨RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012在环保和产品安全方面的潜在发展前景。
第一章：引言随着科技的快速发展，新型电子产品不断涌现，全球电子行业的规模和影响力也日益扩大。
而随之而来的是环境问题的不断加剧以及产品质量安全问题的持续引发。
为了保护环境和确保消费者的健康和安全，各国政府和组织纷纷制定相关的法规和标准，如RoHS2.0和协调标准EN50581：2012。
本文对RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012进行详解，旨在阐述其对环境保护和产品质量安全的重要性，并探讨其未来的发展前景。
第二章：RoHS2.0的概述1. RoHS2.0的背景和历史RoHS全称为“限制使用某些有害物质指令”，是欧盟制定的一系列规定，要求电子电气设备中的重金属和有害物质的含量必须控制在一定范围内，以保护环境和人类健康。
中国rohs2.0测试方法 -回复
中国rohs2.0测试方法-回复中国ROHS2.0测试方法是一种用于评估电子产品和电子组件是否符合中国ROHS2.0标准的测试方法。
ROHS2.0是欧盟针对电子和电气设备中有毒有害物质使用限制的指令，旨在保护环境和人类健康。
中国ROHS2.0测试要求电子产品和电子组件满足一定的有害物质含量限制，并要求进行相应的测试来验证其符合性。
第一步：理解ROHS2.0标准ROHS2.0标准规定了电子产品和电子组件中有毒有害物质的含量限制。
该标准主要包括对铅、汞、镉、六价铬、聚溴联苯（PBBs）和聚溴二苯醚（PBDEs）六种物质的限制。
根据ROHS2.0标准，这些物质的含量在一部分电子产品和电子组件中不能超过0.1（质量百分比），而在另一部分产品中不能超过0.01。
了解这些有害物质的限制是进行ROHS2.0测试的基础。
第二步：测试样品准备在进行ROHS2.0测试之前，首先需要准备测试样品。
测试样品应该是真实的电子产品或电子组件，与实际市场上销售的产品相同。
样品的数量应足够，以保证测试结果的准确性。
同时，样品的选择应代表该产品或组件的常见类型和规格，以获得更全面的测试结果。
第三步：测试方法选择中国ROHS2.0测试方法基于国际标准，主要借鉴了欧盟ROHS指令的测试方法。
可以选择以下几种常用的测试方法进行ROHS2.0测试：1. X射线荧光分析（XRF）：XRF是一种无损的测试方法，通过测量样品中元素的荧光光谱来确定有毒有害物质的含量。
这种方法非常适合对电子产品中的金属物质进行测试。
2. 燃烧柜测试：燃烧柜测试主要用于检测电子产品中的溴化物含量。
通过燃烧柜将样品燃烧，并测量燃烧产物中的溴化物含量，从而判断溴化物的含量是否超过限制。
3. 散射X射线测试（STR）：STR是一种用于测试有机物质中溴含量的方法。
通过将样品放入散射X射线仪中，测量样品中散射的X射线强度来确定溴的含量。
第四步：执行测试根据选定的测试方法，执行ROHS2.0测试。
rohs2.0指令概述
rohs2.0指令概述
RoHS2.0指令即《关于限制在电子电气产品中使用某些有害成分的指令》的第二版，是对欧盟市场内销售的电子电气产品进行的一项环保指令。
该指令的目标是限制在电子电气产品中使用某些有害物质，以减少对环境和人类健康的潜在影响。
RoHS2.0指令规定，自2011年7月1日起，投放欧盟市场的电子电气产品不得含有铅、汞、镉、六价铬、多溴联苯（PBB）和多溴二苯醚（PBDE）等六种有害物质。
同时，该指令还对不同类别的电子电气产品规定了不同的符合性评估要求，以保障产品的安全性和环保性。
此外，RoHS2.0指令还设立了过渡期规定，为新纳入RoHS2.0管控产品的生产商提供了充足的时间来符合指令要求。
在过渡期内，RoHS2.0将对新纳入产品进行管控，并逐步将管控范围扩大到所有电子电气设备。
为了确保电子电气产品符合RoHS2.0指令的要求，生产商需要对其产品进行符合性评估，并获取相应的符合性证书或声明。
同时，欧盟各成员国还通过严格的监管和检查，确保市场上的电子电气产品符合RoHS2.0指令的要求。
总之，RoHS2.0指令是欧盟为了减少电子电气产品对环境和人类健康的潜在影响而制定的一项重要环保指令。
通过限制在电子电气产品中使用某些有害物质，该指令有助于推动电子电气行业向更加环保、可持续的方向发展。
详解RoHS2
详解RoHS2.0及协调标准EN50581：2012的研究报告RoHS2.0是欧盟在RoHS(Restriction of Hazardous Substances)指令基础上发布的新一版指令，旨在限制电子电气产品中有害物质的使用，保护人类健康和环境。
RoHS2.0于2011年1月发布，并于2013年7月22日正式实施。
RoHS2.0限制电子电气产品中的六种有害物质，包括铅、镉、汞、六价铬、多溴联苯和多溴二苯醚。
产品必须符合RoHS2.0的要求才能在欧盟市场上销售。
此外，RoHS2.0还要求制造商提供符合要求的技术文件，包括产品材料清单、测试报告和符合要求的产品标识。
协调标准EN50581:2012是指导RoHS2.0的标准，它规定了符合RoHS2.0要求的技术文件应该包含什么内容，以满足RoHS2.0的要求。
EN50581:2012规定，制造商应该检查他们的供应链，确认产品是否符合RoHS2.0的要求。
技术文件应包含产品的材料清单，这些材料应符合RoHS2.0的要求。
制造商还应该提供测试报告以证明其产品符合RoHS2.0的标准。
如果产品的RoHS2.0符合性存在问题，制造商应该记录处理的流程，并告知客户。
在实践中，RoHS2.0和EN50581:2012的实施对企业的影响很大。
制造商需要制定RoHS2.0符合性计划，并确保其供应链符合RoHS2.0的要求。
这需要投入大量的时间和资源，以确保其产品符合RoHS2.0的标准。
此外，制造商还需要提供符合标准的技术文件和测试报告，以证明其产品符合RoHS2.0要求。
这需要对企业的质量管理体系进行调整。
同时，制造商还需要持续关注RoHS2.0标准的最新变化，以保持符合RoHS2.0要求。
总之，RoHS2.0和EN50581:2012指导企业如何操作以确保产品符合RoHS2.0的标准。
这些标准的实施对企业来说是一项挑战和机遇。
企业需要投入大量的资源和时间，以确保其供应链符合RoHS2.0的要求，并提供符合标准的技术文件和测试报告。
关於ROHS2.0 测试报告
供應商名稱Supplier Name::
地址Address:
簽名Signature:
公章Company Stamp:
日期Date:
NO
ROHS 原有6項有害物質substance
1
鎘及其化合物Cadmium and its compounds（Cd）
2
鉛及其化合物Lead and its compounds（Pb）
3
l butyl phthalate 邻苯二甲酸丁苄酯（BBP）
4
Dibutyl phthalate 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯（DBP)
請確認貴司產品是否有ROHS2.0測試報告List out ROHS2.0testreportofproduct
產品名稱Product Name
XX料號
PN
是否有ROHS 2.0測試報告
Is there anyROHS 2.0testReport
計畫提交日期
Sumbit date
備注
Remark
備註：如果有ROHS 2.0測試報告，請提交報告并在以上表格填寫產品型號；如果沒有，請告知哪些產品計畫在何時提交報告,謝謝~
Remark：If you havethe ROHS2.0testreport,pleasesubmitand list out the PN; If you don’t haveit, please let us know which datewhich productyou will submitreport，tks!
3
汞及其化合物Mercury and its compounds（Hg）
4
六價鉻及其化合物Hexavalent Chromium and its compounds（Cr6+）
RoHS 2.0欧洲议会报告-20100615
RR\430424EN.docPE430.424v05-00EN United in diversityENEUROPEAN PARLIAMENT2009 - 2014Session documentA7-0196/201015.6.2010***IREPORTon the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast)(COM(2008)0809 – C6-0471/2008 – 2008/0240(COD)) Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Rapporteur: Jill Evans(Recast - Rule 87 of the Rules of Procedure)PR_COD_1RecastingamSymbols for procedures* Consultation proceduremajority of the votes cast**I Cooperation procedure (first reading)majority of the votes cast**II Cooperation procedure (second reading)majority of the votes cast, to approve the common positionmajority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amendthe common position*** Assent proceduremajority of Parliament’s component Members except in casescovered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty andArticle 7 of the EU Treaty***I Codecision procedure (first reading)majority of the votes cast***II Codecision procedure (second reading)majority of the votes cast, to approve the common positionmajority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amendthe common position***III Codecision procedure (third reading)majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by theCommission.)Amendments to a legislative textIn amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics. Inthe case of amending acts, passages in an existing provision that theCommission has left unchanged, but that Parliament wishes to amend, arehighlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make inpassages of this kind are indicated thus: [...]. Highlighting in normal italics isan indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislativetext for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text(for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of thedepartments concerned.PE430.424v05-00 2/80 RR\430424EN.doc ENCONTENTSPage DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (5)EXPLANATORY STATEMENT (71)ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS (76)ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION (78)PROCEDURE (80)RR\430424EN.doc 3/80 PE430.424v05-00ENPE430.424v05-00 4/80 RR\430424EN.doc ENRR\430424EN.doc 5/80 PE430.424v05-00ENDRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONon the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast)(COM(2008)0809 – C6-0471/2008 – 2008/0240(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading - recast) The European Parliament ,− having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council(COM(2008)0809),− having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which theCommission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0471/2008), – having regard to the Commission communication to Parliament and the Council entitled: 'Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures' (COM)2009)0665), – having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU, − having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16December 20091, − having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 29 May 20102, − having regard to Rules 87 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,− having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health andFood Safety (A7-0196/2010), 1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out, taking into account therecommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; 2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend theproposal substantially or replace it with another text; 3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission and tothe national parliaments.1OJ C 306, 16.12.2009, p. 36–382OJ C 141, 29.5.2010, p. 55–64PE430.424v05-006/80RR\430424EN.docENAmendment 1Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3a) Directive 2008/98/EC of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 gives first priority to prevention in waste legislation. Prevention is defined inter alia as measures that reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products.JustificationThe recast of RoHS should be put into the context of the waste hierarchy established in the waste framework directive in 2008. Prevention is the top priority in the binding waste hierarchy. Prevention includes measures to reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products. The recast of RoHS recast is therefore an important opportunity to translate this obligation into concrete action, all the more that electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) continues to create numerous problems during waste treatment. Amendment 2Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3b) The Council Resolution of 25 January 1988 on a Community action programme to combat environmental pollution by cadmium 1 invites theCommission to pursue without delay the development of specific measures for such a programme. Human health also has to be protected and an overall strategy that in particular restricts the use of cadmium and stimulates research into substitutes should therefore be implemented. That Resolution stresses that the use ofcadmium should be limited to cases where such use is suitable and where safer alternatives do not exist.1OJ C 30, 4.2.1988, p. 1.RR\430424EN.doc7/80PE430.424v05-00ENJustificationThe reference to the Council Resolution of 1988 (Recital 4 of current RoHS) should bereinstated as it is the political reference for combating environmental pollution by cadmium.Amendment 3Proposal for a directive Recital 3 c (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3c) The European Parliament, in its resolution of 14 November 1996 on the communication from the Commission on the review of the Community Strategy on Waste Management and the draft Council resolution on waste policy 1, asked the Commission to present proposals for directives on a number of priority waste streams, including electrical and electronic waste. The European Parliament, in the same resolution, requested the Council and theCommission to put forward proposals to reduce the presence of hazardous substances in waste such as chlorine, mercury, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), cadmium and other heavy metals.1OJ C 362, 2.12.1996, p. 241.JustificationThe reference to the Parliament Resolution of 1996 (Recital 4 of current RoHS) should be inserted as an important reminder that Parliament already asked for concrete restrictions on PVC back in 1996. Amendment 4Proposal for a directive Recital 3 d (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3d) Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending DirectivePE430.424v05-008/80RR\430424EN.docEN79/117/EEC 1 recalls that the objective of protecting the environment and human health from persistent organic pollutants cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, owing to thetransboundary effects of those pollutants, and can therefore be better achieved at Union level. Pursuant to that Regulation, releases of persistent organic pollutants, such as dioxins and furans, which are unintentional by-products of industrial processes, should be identified and reduced as soon as possible with the ultimate aim of elimination, where feasible. Thermal treatment oruncontrolled disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment containinghalogenated flame retardants or PVC can contribute significantly to the formation of dioxins and furans.1OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 7.JustificationThe RoHS recast needs to be put into the context of the EU’s international obligations to reduce total releases of dioxins and furans, with the goal of their continuing minimization and, where feasible, ultimate elimination. The final destiny of large quantities of WEEE remains unclear. High-temperature incineration remains the exception. Sub-standardtreatment of WEEE – in the EU or in third countries - risks remaining a reality for significant amounts. Emissions of dioxins and furans can only be addressed via material choices at design stage. Amendment 5Proposal for a directive Recital 3e (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3e) The study commissioned by theCommission on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment highly recommended a phase-out oforganobromines and organochlorines due to their potential to form polybrominated and polychlorinated dioxins and furans in waste treatment operations, and gave priority to the phase-out of PVC overselective risk management options toguarantee a reduced release of PVC, of itsadditives and of hazardous combustionproducts. It also recommends thelabelling of beryllium metal and berylliumoxide and the voluntary phase-outcombined with market surveillance ofseveral other examined substances.JustificationThe recommendations of the Öko-Institut with its different options should be referred to,reflecting that the suggestions go beyond the recommendation to include substances intoAnnex IV.Amendment 6Proposal for a directiveRecital 3f (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3f) There is scientific uncertainty aboutthe safety of nanomaterials for humanhealth and the environment, nointernationally agreed definition of ananomaterial and no internationallyagreed test guidelines. The Commission'sScientific Committee on Emerging andNewly Identified Health Risks(SCENIHR) adopted on 28-29 September2005 an opinion on nanotechnologieswhich concluded that there were "majorgaps in the knowledge necessary for riskassessment and concluded that "existingtoxicological and eco-toxicologicalmethods may not be sufficient to addressall of the issues arising in relation tonanoparticles". There is increasingscientific evidence that some carbonnanotubes may behave like asbestos fibresand thus have severe impact on humanhealth. The same applies to nanosilverparticles which may end up in theenvironment and may have severe impactson soil, aquatic and terrestrial organisms.RR\430424EN.doc 9/80 PE430.424v05-00ENPE430.424v05-0010/80RR\430424EN.docENJustificationA 2009 research project on emerging nanotechnologies found that about 807 products are available on the market containing nanomaterials, some of which are EEE. There is acommon agreement amongst nanotoxicologists that risks of severe impacts on health and the environment are real, precautious measures are therefore warranted in regards tonanomaterials. This amendment is linked to the amendment of Art. 4 (1) b new, suggesting a labelling for nanosilver and carbon nanotubes.Amendment 7Proposal for a directive Recital 6Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(6) The substances covered by thisDirective are scientifically well researched and evaluated and have been subject to different measures both at Community and at national level.(6) The substances covered by this Directive should be scientifically well researched and evaluated prior toestablishing restrictions and becoming subject to different measures both at Union and at national level. Substances listed in Annex III should be scientifically well researched and evaluated prior to establishing restrictions.JustificationThe assessment of substances listed in annex III has not yet been completed. The substances listed in annex III are scheduled for assessment, which should be done thoroughly; however, this work has not yet been finished.Amendment 8Proposal for a directive Recital 7Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(7) The measures provided for in this Directive take into account existing international guidelines andrecommendations and are based on an assessment of available scientific and technical information. The measures are necessary to achieve the chosen level of protection of human and animal health and(7) The measures provided for in this Directive take into account existing international guidelines andrecommendations and are based on an assessment of available scientific and technical information. The measures are necessary to achieve the chosen level of protection of human and animal health andthe environment, having regard to the risks which the absence of measures would be likely to create in the Community. The measures should be kept under review and, if necessary, adjusted to take account of available technical and scientific information. the environment, having regard to the risks which the absence of measures would be likely to create in the Union. The measures should be kept under review and, if necessary, adjusted to take account of available technical and scientific information. In particular, the risks to human health and the environment arising from the use of substances listed in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 with special attention to Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) and Dibutylphthalate (DBP) should be considered as a priority.JustificationSubstances about which some concern has been expressed by various bodies.Amendment 9Proposal for a directiveRecital 8Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(8) This Directive supplements the general Community waste management legislation, such as Directive 2008/[…]/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste. (8) This Directive supplements the general EU waste management legislation, such as Directive 2008/[…]/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste as well as Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)1.1 OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.JustificationIt should be stated specifically that RoHS supplements REACH. RoHS and REACH have different objectives, scope, timelines, and outreach. RoHS was created to address the specific problems of a fast-growing waste stream, REACH addresses chemical substances at a general level, with no special focus on waste. REACH is a regional law still in its infancy, RoHS is already setting a global standard. Key problems with WEEE are due to polymers, which are exempted from REACH. RoHS should be further developed to address the specificRR\430424EN.doc 11/80 PE430.424v05-00problems of the recovery and disposal of WEEE at the origin.Amendment 10Proposal for a directiveRecital 11Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(11) The technical development of electrical and electronic equipment without heavy metals, PBDE and PBB should be taken into account. (11) The technical development of electrical and electronic equipment without heavy metals, brominated flame retardants, chlorinated flame retardants, PVC and its hazardous plasticisers should be taken into account.JustificationThe electronics industry is well-advanced in its global initiative to phase out the use of brominated/chlorinated flame retardants and PVC. Major electronics companies have already phased out the use of these substances in some/all of their products (e.g. 50% of all new mobile phones are already low halogen). Almost all major electronics companies have committed to do so for consumer products (e.g. market share of low-halogen personal computers will be at over 40% in the next 1-2 years). Similar action has already been undertaken by some manufacturers of ‘white goods’ in the past.Amendment 11Proposal for a directiveRecital 12Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(12) As soon as scientific evidence is available and taking into account the precautionary principle, the prohibition of other hazardous substances and their substitution by more environmentally friendly alternatives which ensure at least the same level of protection of consumers should be examined, paying attention to coherency with other Community legislation, and in particular to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Specific account should be taken of the (12) Periodically, and as soon as scientific evidence is available, and taking into account the precautionary principle, the prohibition of other hazardous substances and their substitution by more environmentally friendly alternative substances or technologies which ensure at least the same level of protection of consumers should be examined.To this end, the Commission should study the negative impacts of other hazardous substances and the feasibility of substituting them, in particular at the end of life of electrical and electronic equipment, with a view to making legislative proposals to strengthen thePE430.424v05-00 12/80 RR\430424EN.docpotential impact on SMEs.provisions of this Directive on a regularbasis. This examination should include afull impact assessment with consultationof relevant stakeholders. The examinationshould also pay attention to coherencewith other EU legislation and maximisesynergies with the work carried out underRegulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Specificaccount should be taken of the potentialimpact on SMEs.JustificationAmendment 12Proposal for a directiveRecital 12 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(12a) The development of renewableforms of energy is one of the Union’s keyobjectives, and the contribution made byrenewable energy sources toenvironmental and climate objectives iscrucial. Directive 2009/28/EC of 23 April2009 on the promotion of the use ofenergy from renewable sources andamending and subsequently repealingDirectives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC1recalls that there should be coherencebetween those objectives and theremainder of the Union’s environmentallegislation. Consequently, this Directiveshould not prevent the development ofrenewable energy technologies thatpresent no danger to the environment andthat are sustainable and economicallyviable, such as photovoltaic solar panels,which should be excluded from the scopeof this Directive. Independent impactassessment studies requested by theCommission also recommend theexclusion of photovoltaic solar panelsfrom the scope of this Directive.RR\430424EN.doc 13/80 PE430.424v05-001 OJ L 140, 05.06.2009, p. 16.JustificationThe revision of the RoHS Directive should be coherent with the EU’s climate change objectives and should allow the development of sustainable, economically viable forms of energy. It is therefore essential to allow specific exclusions from the scope of this Directive in order to help the EU attain its broader objectives as regards environmental protection, security of energy supply and combating climate change.Amendment 13Proposal for a directiveRecital 13Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(13) Exemptions from the substitution requirement should be permitted if substitution is not possible from the scientific and technical point of view , taking specific account of the situation of SMEs or if the negative environmental, health or socio-economic impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the health, environmental or socio-economic benefits of the substitution or the availability and reliability of substitutes is not ensured.Substitution of the hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment should also be carried out in a way so as to be compatible with the health and safety of users of electrical and electronic equipment. The placing on the market of medical devices requires a conformity assessment procedure, according to Directives 93/42/EC and98/79/EC, which could require the involvement of a notified body designated by Competent Authorities of Member States. If such a notified body certifies that the safety of the potential substitute for the intended use in medical devices or in vitro medical devices is not demonstrated, this will be viewed as a clear negative socio-economic, health and consumer safety impact. It should be possible to apply for (13) Exemptions from the substitution requirement should be permitted if substitution is not possible from a scientific and technical point of view, taking specific account of the situation of SMEs or if the negative environmental and health impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the health and environmental benefits of the substitution. Substitution of the hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment should also be carried out in a way so as to be compatible with the health and safety of users of electrical and electronic equipment. Socio-economic considerations should be taken into account when deciding on the duration of an exemption. It should be possible to grant a grace period after expiry of an exemption in case more time is required to ensure adequate availability of substitutes, including for reasons of intellectual property restrictions. The placing on the market of medical devices requires a conformity assessment procedure, according to Directives 93/42/EC and98/79/EC, which could require the involvement of a notified body designated by Competent Authorities of Member States. If such a notified body certifies thatPE430.424v05-00 14/80 RR\430424EN.docexemptions of equipment coming under the scope of this Directive from the date of its entry into force, even when that is before the actual inclusion in the scope of that equipment. the safety of the potential substitute for the intended use in medical devices or in vitro medical devices is not demonstrated, this will be viewed as a clear negative socio-economic, health and consumer safety impact. It should be possible to apply for exemptions of equipment coming under the scope of this Directive from the date of its entry into force, even when that is before the actual inclusion in the scope of that equipment.Amendment 14Proposal for a directiveRecital 14Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(14) Exemptions from the prohibition for certain specific materials or components should be limited in their scope, in order to achieve a gradual phase-out of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, given that the use of those substances in such applications should become avoidable.(14) Exemptions from the prohibition for certain specific materials or components should be adopted on a case-by-case basis and should be limited in their scope and duration, in order to achieve a gradual phase-out of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, given that the use of those substances in such applications should become avoidable.Amendment 15Proposal for a directiveRecital 14 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(14a)The use of nanomaterials inelectrical and electronic equipment mayincrease with the further development oftechnology. There is inadequateinformation about the use ofnanomaterials other than nanosilver andcertain carbon nanotubes in electrical andelectronic equipment and the risksRR\430424EN.doc 15/80 PE430.424v05-00associated with such use. In order toenable the Commission to assess thesafety of nanomaterials in electrical andelectronic equipment, economic operatorsshould notify the use of nanomaterials inelectrical and electronic equipment andprovide all relevant data with regard totheir safety for human health and theenvironment. The Commission shouldassess the information received and comeforward with a legislative proposal foradequate risk management, if necessary.Producers should label electrical andelectronic equipment that containsnanomaterials that can lead to exposureof consumers, in order to enableconsumers to make an informed choice.Amendment 16Proposal for a directiveRecital 19Text proposed by the Commission Amendmentdeleted(19) The measures necessary for theimplementation of this Directive should beadopted in accordance with CouncilDecision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999laying down the procedures for theexercise of implementing powersconferred on the Commission.(This amendment is linked to the replacement of the former "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" by the new procedure of delegated acts under Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.)JustificationRecital 20 as modified covers the necessary provisions.Amendment 17PE430.424v05-00 16/80 RR\430424EN.docProposal for a directiveRecital 20Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(20) In particular the Commission should be empowered to adapt Annexes II, III, IV,V and VI to technical and scientific progress and to adopt other necessary implementing measures. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of Directive 2002/95/EC, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC. (20) In order to allow the provisions of this Directive to be adapted to technical and scientific progress and to adopt other necessary measures, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in respect of the adaptation of Annexes V, VI,VIa and VIb, the adoption of a format for applications for exemptions, detailed rules for compliance with maximum concentration values, on sampling and inspection, the definition of nanomaterials, standards for the detection of nanomaterials, the application of the labelling of nanomaterials and adaptations to REACH.Amendment 18Proposal for a directiveRecital 23 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(23a) A thorough analysis of the addedvalue of the RoHS Directive should becarried out in the context of the upcomingreview of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.RR\430424EN.doc 17/80 PE430.424v05-00Amendment 19Proposal for a directiveArticle 1Text proposed by the Commission AmendmentThis Directive lays down rules on the restriction of use of hazardous substances in electric and electronic equipment with a view to contribute to the protection of human health and the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment. This Directive lays down rules on the restriction of use of hazardous substances in electric and electronic equipment with a view to contribute to the protection of human health, the environment, and the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment.JustificationThe subject matter should reflect the content of the recitals. Recital 4 says: “even if WEEE were collected separately and submitted to recycling processes, its content of mercury, cadmium, would be likely to pose risk to health and the environment”. Recital 5 then states that “the most effective way of ensuring the significant reduction of risks to health and the environment relating to those substances … is the substitution”. Thus the phase-out of hazardous substances contributes to the protection of the environment as such, not just via environmentally sound recovery and disposal.Amendment 20Proposal for a directiveArticle 2 - paragraph 1Text proposed by the Commission Amendment1. This Directive shall apply to electrical and electronic equipment falling under the categories set out in Annex I as specified in Annex II . 1. This Directive shall apply to electrical and electronic equipment, including cables, consumables and accessories, falling under the categories set out in Annex I.PE430.424v05-00 18/80 RR\430424EN.doc。
RoHS2.0声明书
RoHS2.0声明书ROHS Declaration(General)Restriction of the Use Certain Hazardous Substances in electrical and electronic equipmentThe New ROHS Directive 2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union on July 1,2011 and took effect on July 21,2011.RoHS指令即2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）在2011年7月1日已公布在欧盟官方杂志并在2011年7月21日起生效。
Based on the ROHS 2.0 requirement, we collected materials information from our suppliers and controlled production process in our company, so our company (including accessories)assure that the below list products / parts or attachment list out products / parts compliance with ROHS Directive 2011/65/EU control item and value as showed in the following tables . once we signed this ROHS Declaration ,We shall agree to take liabilities when supplied parts or materials violates the agreed specification under this ROHS declaration.根据ROHS 2.0要求，我们收集了供应商物料信息并且在公司内部对生产过程进行了控制。
ROHS2
ROHS2
该文档是关于欧盟ROHS2.0指南(EU)的新修订。
下面是关于
该指南的一些重要信息：
- 指南编号：(EU)
- 这个指南的目的是为了保护人类和环境免受危险物质的影响，实施RoHS2.0指令。
- RoHS2.0指令限制了电子电气设备中的危险物质的使用，包
括铅、汞、镉、六价铬、多溴联苯醚（PBB）和多溴二苯醚（PBDE）。
- 修订指南确保了欧洲市场上销售的电子电气设备符合
RoHS2.0指令的要求。
- 新修订指南包括对原指南的更新和改进，以保持与最新技术
和法规的一致性。
- 该指南适用于在欧盟市场销售的电子电气设备制造商、进口商、分销商等相关方。
该指南的修订对于涉及电子电气设备的企业来说非常重要，因
为它确保了他们的产品符合欧盟的法规要求。
企业需要认真理解修
订指南并确保他们的产品符合其中的要求。
同时，他们也应该留意是否有进一步的更新和修订。
欧盟的ROHS2.0指南对于整个电子电气设备行业来说都具有重要意义，因为它为消费者提供了更安全和环保的产品选择。
通过合规于指南的要求，企业可以保证他们的产品不会对人类和环境造成不良影响。
-END-。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
深圳市创亿欣精密电子股份有限公司 编号：
联络报告共 1 页 ， 第 1 页
各厂商负责人：
你们好！
2011年7月1日，欧盟议会和理事会在欧盟官方公报上发布指令 2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）以取代2002/95/EC ，新指令在2011年7月21日生效，2013年1月3日起指令2002/95/EC 将会被废除。
2011/65/EU RoHS2.0主要增加HBCDD、DEHP、DBP和BBP四项管控物质，即原来RoHS主要管控六项有害物质，现管控十项有害物质。
请各厂商自查交“深圳市创亿欣精密电子股份有限公司”物料是否含有最新增加的四项管控物质，因此请各厂商在2012年提交给“深圳市创亿欣精密电子股份有限公司”的物料SGS 报告，需要有此四项物质的测试项目及结果（金属类材料除外），另重申我司只接受SGS、CTI、ITS三家第三方检测公司的报告。
以上，谢谢各厂商的配合！并请在2012年1月13号前签回。
祝：新年快乐！。