theyieldofGrindBeadproducts-GB(六西格码项目
相关主题
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Comment: 1. Grind Bead belong to S100 products. 2. The total yield of S100 is close to 90%.
Continuous Improvement
6
Project Metrics
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement
Laird Technologies Six Sigma GB Project
Define Phase
Increase the yield of Grind Bead products-GB
Project Summary
Project Title
Increase the yield of Grind Bead products-GB
11
Fra Baidu bibliotek
Pareto Chart
Main improve defects
Continuous Improvement
Comment : 1. Scrap data is from product daily report in May-2010
2.In the Pareto Chart of Defect Item, Loss, chip and samll ID occupy
Project Scope
Grind Bead
Green Belt
******
Deployment Champion
******
Process Owner
******
Finance Representative
******
Mentor
******
2
Continuous Improvement
Project Team Members
Comment: Grind Bead Yield is more lower than the other products.
5
Project Background
S100 Total Yield
100.0% 95.0% 90.0% 85.0% 80.0% 75.0% 70.0% 65.0% 60.0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60%
Grind Bead Yield report
Target Actual
Target = 90%
Baseline = 77.5%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
• 12.5% room of improvement
Team Members & Departments
Leader: ****** ------Process Engineer Member: ****** ------Process Engineer
****** ------Production Supervisor ****** ------Production Supervisor ****** ------Production Supervisor ****** ------QA Supervisor …
9
Summary – Deliverables & Conclusion
Continuous Improvement
• Grind Bead Yield was 77.5% from Jan to May-2010, there is about 12.5% potential defect ratio reduction to achieve target 90% by the end of 2010.
3
Continuous Improvement
Problem Statement
Continuous Improvement
Problem Statement • The yield of Grind Bead products is 77.53% from Jan-
2010 to May-2010, which impacted FGTS seriously
• Projected Annual Savings of $30K Meet Customer Delivery
10
Continuous Improvement
Laird Technologies Six Sigma GB Project
Measure Phase
Increase the yield of Grind Bead products-GB
8
Financial Impact & Saving
Continuous Improvement
Assessed saving =Standard Cost* Forecast*(Baseline Scrap rate-Target Scrap Rate) = USD30K
Actual Saving From Oct To Dec: Actual Saving=USD59.4K
7
Project Time Frame (Milestone)
Define Measure Analyze Improve Control
2010.06.01 2010.07.01 2010.07.30 2010.08.20 2010.09.01
Continuous Improvement
Project Objective • Increase the yield:
From 77.53% to 90% by the end of Sep. 2010
• Business Benefits • Projected Annual Savings of $30K • Meet Customer Delivery
4
Project Background
Continuous Improvement
100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60%
Grind Bead Yield report
Target Actual
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Continuous Improvement
6
Project Metrics
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement
Laird Technologies Six Sigma GB Project
Define Phase
Increase the yield of Grind Bead products-GB
Project Summary
Project Title
Increase the yield of Grind Bead products-GB
11
Fra Baidu bibliotek
Pareto Chart
Main improve defects
Continuous Improvement
Comment : 1. Scrap data is from product daily report in May-2010
2.In the Pareto Chart of Defect Item, Loss, chip and samll ID occupy
Project Scope
Grind Bead
Green Belt
******
Deployment Champion
******
Process Owner
******
Finance Representative
******
Mentor
******
2
Continuous Improvement
Project Team Members
Comment: Grind Bead Yield is more lower than the other products.
5
Project Background
S100 Total Yield
100.0% 95.0% 90.0% 85.0% 80.0% 75.0% 70.0% 65.0% 60.0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60%
Grind Bead Yield report
Target Actual
Target = 90%
Baseline = 77.5%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
• 12.5% room of improvement
Team Members & Departments
Leader: ****** ------Process Engineer Member: ****** ------Process Engineer
****** ------Production Supervisor ****** ------Production Supervisor ****** ------Production Supervisor ****** ------QA Supervisor …
9
Summary – Deliverables & Conclusion
Continuous Improvement
• Grind Bead Yield was 77.5% from Jan to May-2010, there is about 12.5% potential defect ratio reduction to achieve target 90% by the end of 2010.
3
Continuous Improvement
Problem Statement
Continuous Improvement
Problem Statement • The yield of Grind Bead products is 77.53% from Jan-
2010 to May-2010, which impacted FGTS seriously
• Projected Annual Savings of $30K Meet Customer Delivery
10
Continuous Improvement
Laird Technologies Six Sigma GB Project
Measure Phase
Increase the yield of Grind Bead products-GB
8
Financial Impact & Saving
Continuous Improvement
Assessed saving =Standard Cost* Forecast*(Baseline Scrap rate-Target Scrap Rate) = USD30K
Actual Saving From Oct To Dec: Actual Saving=USD59.4K
7
Project Time Frame (Milestone)
Define Measure Analyze Improve Control
2010.06.01 2010.07.01 2010.07.30 2010.08.20 2010.09.01
Continuous Improvement
Project Objective • Increase the yield:
From 77.53% to 90% by the end of Sep. 2010
• Business Benefits • Projected Annual Savings of $30K • Meet Customer Delivery
4
Project Background
Continuous Improvement
100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60%
Grind Bead Yield report
Target Actual
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec