肿瘤免疫治疗疗效评价的新标准

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志 http ://

Chin J Cancer Biother ,Aug.2011,Vol.18,No.4

DOI :10.3872/j.issn.1007⁃385X.2011.04.02

·标准与规范·

肿瘤免疫治疗疗效评价的新标准

任秀宝,于津浦(天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤研究所暨教育部乳腺癌防治重点实验室,天津300060)

[摘 要] 目的:肿瘤免疫治疗近年来发展迅猛,已被越来越多的临床医生所认可,并广泛应用于多种恶性肿瘤的治疗。与传统的化疗不同,免疫治疗发生严重毒性反应的概率更低,患者耐受性更好,尤其对患者生活质量的改善作用更明显。但遗憾的是,目前临床上采用传统的肿瘤治疗评价体系对肿瘤免疫治疗疗效评价时往往不能令人满意,导致部分进入Ⅲ期临床试验的免疫治疗项目最后以失败告终。鉴于现有WHO 或RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumor )标准很难对肿瘤免疫治疗的临床疗效进行准确的解读和确切的评价,因此在2009年第23期的Clinical Cancer Research 上专门刊载了由纽约Me⁃

morial Sloan⁃Kettering 癌症中心Wolchok 教授等撰写的论文———《针对实体瘤免疫治疗疗效评价指南:免疫相关疗效评价标准》,深入探讨了肿瘤免疫治疗疗效评价新标准的意义和应用前景。本文以该论文为主,结合其他相关文献,对“肿瘤免疫疗

效评价的新标准”这一肿瘤学界的热点问题作一介绍。[关键词] 肿瘤;免疫治疗;疗效评价;免疫相关反应标准

[中图分类号] R730.5;R730.3 [文献标志码] A [文章编号] 1007⁃385X (2011)04⁃0351⁃04

[基金项目] 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.30872986/H1611)。Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

(No.30872986/H1611)

[作者简介] 任秀宝(1966-),男,天津市人,博士,主任医师/教授,主要从事肿瘤生物治疗的临床和基础研究。E⁃mail :rwziyi@ [网络出版] 

http ://www.

cnki.

net /kcms /detail /31.1725.

R.

20110714.1100.009.html

New criteria for evaluating efficiency of cancer immunotherapy

REN Xiu⁃bao ,YU Jin⁃pu (Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Ministry of Education &Institute of Oncology ,Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Tianjin University ,Tianjin 300060,China )

[Abstract ] Cancer immunotherapy has been widely accepted in clinic and has been applied for treatment of multiple malignancies in recent years.Different from chemotherapy ,most patients can well tolerate immunotherapy and benefit from

the improvement of life quality after immunotherapy ;furthermore ,immunotherapy shows lower risk of severe toxic side effects.Regrettably ,disappointing results always occur when the conventional response evaluation criteria are used to as⁃sess the clinical efficiency of cancer immunotherapy ,which might be responsible for the failure of quite a number of phase Ⅲclinical trials of cancer immunotherapy.Since it is very difficult to use the existing WHO and RECIST criteria for accu⁃rate elucidation and evaluation of the clinical responses to cancer immunotherapy ,Dr.Wolchok of New York Memorial

Sloan⁃Kettering Cancer Center and his colleagues published a paper in Clinical Cancer Research in 2009,entitled “Guide⁃lines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors :Immune⁃related response criteria ”,in which a novel re⁃sponse evaluation criterion system was proposed for cancer immunotherapy ,and the clinical application of this system was discussed thoroughly.This paper briefly introduces the hot issue in onclology —“new evaluation criteria for efficiency of

cancer immunotherapy ”.

[Key words ] neoplasms ;immunotherapy ;efficacy evaluation ;immune⁃related response criteria

[Chin J Cancer Biother ,2011,18(4):351⁃354]

WHO 标准和RECIST (response evaluation crite⁃

ria in solid tumor )标准均是以瘤体大小变化来衡量疗效,根据病灶缩减的百分比将临床疗效分为完全缓解(complete response ,CR )、部分缓解(partial re⁃mission ,

PR )、无变化(stable disease ,SD )和疾病进展(progressive disease ,PD ),这也是目前肿瘤治疗疗效

评判的金标准。但值得注意的是,不论是WHO 的实体瘤评价标准还是经过改良的RECIST 评价体系均存在明显的缺陷:(1)以影像学资料作为评价疗

效的唯一标准,以局部的疗效来判定疾病的整体治疗效果;(2)仅以瘤体缩小持续4周以上来评价,反

·

153·

相关文档
最新文档