最新整理雅思写作高分范文赏析：Animal Testing
雅思考官级9分范文：动物实验利弊
雅思考官级9分范文：动物实验利弊雅思考官级9分范文：动物实验利弊题目是Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines andto test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experimentsshould be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, whileothers are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss bothviews and give your own opinion.范文：It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested onanimals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards theviewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support alimited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animalexperimentation. T o use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice maybe given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured.Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals tothis kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures shouldbe respected.They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused,and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may notalways be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical researchbelieve that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can bejustified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such researchmight feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medicaltreatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation.Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products,but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medicalprocedures are concerned.In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing onanimals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives havebeen developed.。
雅思写作模板 雅思写作高频词汇动物类 动物测试animal testing.doc
雅思写作模板雅思写作高频词汇动物类动物测试animal testing今天我们雅思写作的相关文章来研究下动物类话题下是否应该进行动物测试的问题。
跟之前一样，小编会给出题目，相应的雅思写作高分词汇，以及大致的汉语思路。
题目Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.现在，动物实验被广泛应用于开发新药品以及测试其他产品的安全性。
一些人认为这些实验应该被禁止，因为给动物造成痛苦是不道德的。
然后另一些人同意动物实验，因为它们对人类有意。
讨论双方观点并给出你的意见。
雅思写作高分词汇-动物类-动物测试animal testingmedicine 医药are routinely tested on animals 常规的在动物身上做测试morally wrong 道德上错误的a limited amount of 有效数量的the development of medicines 药品的开发ethical arguments 道德理由laboratory mice 实验室的小白鼠effectiveness of a new drug 新药品的有效性opponents of such research 这类研究的反对者lives of all creatures should be respected 所有生物的生命都应该被尊重justify the suffering 使痛苦合理化alternative methods 替代方式medical treatment 医疗治疗方式non-medical products 非医药产品necessary evil 必要的恶equally effective alternatives 同样有效的替代方案雅思写作思路-动物类-动物测试animal testing开头段1. 事实如此，药品和其他产品在给人类使用之前，会常规的在动物身上进行实验。
动物实验英文作文
动物实验英文作文Animal testing is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that animaltesting is necessary for medical and scientific research, while others argue that it is cruel and unnecessary. In my opinion, animal testing should be minimized and replaced with alternative methods whenever possible.One reason why animal testing should be minimized is because it can cause unnecessary harm and suffering to animals. Many animals are subjected to painful and invasive procedures, such as force-feeding, injections, and surgeries. This can cause physical and emotional distress, and in some cases, even death. Moreover, animals are often kept in cramped and unnatural conditions, which can further exacerbate their stress and discomfort.Another reason why animal testing should be minimized is because it may not always be reliable or applicable to humans. Animals and humans have different genetic andphysiological characteristics, which can affect how they respond to drugs and treatments. Therefore, the results of animal testing may not always be applicable to humans, and may even be misleading or harmful. Additionally,alternative methods, such as computer simulations and cell cultures, can provide more accurate and relevant datawithout harming animals.Despite these concerns, some people argue that animal testing is necessary for medical and scientific progress. They point out that many life-saving treatments and cures, such as antibiotics and vaccines, were developed through animal testing. However, it is important to note that notall animal testing is necessary or productive. Moreover, alternative methods have been shown to be just as effective, if not more so, in many cases.In conclusion, animal testing is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both ethical andscientific concerns. While it may have some benefits, it should be minimized and replaced with alternative methods whenever possible. By doing so, we can ensure that we arenot needlessly causing harm and suffering to animals, while still advancing medical and scientific progress.。
动物做实验英文作文
Animal Testing: A Controversial PracticeAnimal testing, also known as animal experimentation, remains a controversial practice that has sparked debates for decades. On one hand, proponents argue that animal testing is essential for scientific and medical advancements, as it helps in developing new treatments, vaccines, and understanding complex biological processes. On the other hand, opponents emphasize the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals in research, citing animal welfare and the questionable reliability of extrapolating results to humans.Advocates of animal testing point to numerous medical breakthroughs that have been made possible through experiments on animals. Drugs, vaccines, and treatments for various diseases and conditions have been developed using data obtained from animal studies. For example, the development of insulin for diabetes and certain cancer treatments would not have been possible without animal testing. Proponents argue that the benefits to human health and well-being outweigh the ethical considerations.However, opponents of animal testing raise valid ethical concerns regarding the treatment of animals in research settings. Many argue that subjecting animals to potentially painful and harmful experiments is cruel and inhumane, as animals may experience suffering and distress during testing procedures. Additionally, there are questions about the relevance of animal studies to humans, as physiological and genetic differences between species may limit the applicability of results to human populations.Furthermore, advancements in alternative methods, such as in vitro testing, computer simulations, and human cell-based models, have raised questions about the necessity of animal testing in modern research. These alternative methods offer opportunities to reduce the reliance on animal models while potentially providing more accurate and human-relevant results.In conclusion, the practice of animal testing remains a complex and contentious issue that requires careful consideration of both scientific and ethical aspects. While animal testing has contributed to important discoveries in science and medicine, the ethical implications and advancements in alternative methods raise questions about the continued necessity of this practice. Moving forward, a balance between scientific progress and ethical responsibility must be struck to ensure the well-being of animals and the advancement of human knowledge and health.。
雅思写作高分范文赏析：Animal Testing
雅思写作高分范文赏析：Animal TestingAnimal TestingPlease Read This Warning Before You Use This Essay for Anything (It MightSave Your Life) Animal Testing Using animals for testing is wrong and should bebanned. They have rights just as we do. Twenty-four hours a day humans are usingdefenseless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals have noway of fighting back. This is why there should be new laws to protect them.These legislations also need to be enforced more regularly. Too many criminalsget away with murder. Although most labs are run by private companies, oftenexperiments are conducted by public organizations. The US government, Army andAir force in particular, has designed and carried out many animal experiments.The purposed experiments were engineered so that many animals would suffer anddie without any certainty that this suffering and death would save a singlelife, or benefit humans in anyway at all; but the same can be said for tens ofthousands of other experiments performed in the US each year. Limiting it tojust experiments done on beagles, the following might sock most people： Forinstance, at the Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, experimentersforced sixty-four beagles to inhale radioactive Strontium 90as part of a larger^Fission Product Inhalation Program^ which began in 1961 and has been paid forby the US Atomic Energy Commission. In this experimentTwenty-five of the dogseventually died. One of the deaths occurred during anepileptic seizure; anotherfrom a brain hemorrhage. Other dogs, before death, became feverish and anemic,lost their appetites, and had hemorrhages. The experimentersin their publishedreport, compared their results with that of other experiments conducted at theUniversity of Utah and the Argonne National Laboratory in which beagles wereinjected with Strontium 90. They concluded that the dose needed to produce^early death^ in fifty percent of the sample group differed from test to testbecause the dogs injected with Strontium 90 retain more of the radioactivesubstance than dogs forced to inhale it. Also, at the University of RochesterSchool Of Medicine a group of experimenters put fifty beagles in wooden boxesand irradiated them with different levels of radiation by x-rays. Twenty-one ofthe dogs died within the first two weeks. The experimenters determined the doseat which fifty percent of the animals will die with ninety-five percentconfidence. The irritated dogs vomited, had diarrhea, andlost their appetites.Later, they hemorrhaged from the mouth, nose, and eyes. In their report, theexperimenters compared their experiment to others of the same nature that eachused around seven hundred dogs. The experimenters said that the injuriesproduced in their own experiment were ^Typical of those described for the dog^(Singer 30). Similarly, experimenters for the US Food and Drug Administrationgave thirty beagles and thirty pigs large amounts of Methoxychlor (a pesticide)in their food, seven days a week for six months, ^In order to insure tissuedamage^ (30). Within eight weeks, eleven dogs exhibited signs of ^abnormalbehavior^ including nervousness, salivation, muscle spasms, and convolutions.Dogs in convultions breathed as rapidly as two hundred times a minute beforethey passed out from lack of oxygen. Upon recovery from an episode ofconvulsions and collapse, the dogs were uncoordinated, apparently blind, and anystimulus such as dropping a feeding pan, squirting water, or touching theanimals initiated another convulsion. After further experimentation on anadditional twenty beagles, the experimenters concluded that massive daily dosesof Methoxychlor produce different effects in dogs from those produced in pigs.These three examples should be enough to show that the Air force beagleexperiments were in no way exceptional. Note that all of these experiments,according to the experimenters^ own reports, obviously caused the animals tosuffer considerably before dying. No steps were taken to prevent this suffering,even when it was clear that the radiation or poison had made the animalsextremely sick. Also, these experiments are parts of series of similarexperiments, repeated with only minor variations, that are being carried out allover the country. These experiments Do Not save human lives or improve them inany way. It was already known that Strontium 90 is unhealthy before the beaglesdied; and the experimenters who poisoned dogs and pigs with Methoxychlor knewbeforehand that the large amounts they were feeding the animals (amounts nohuman could ever consume) would cause damage. In any case, as the differingresults they obtained on pigs and dogs make it clear, it isnot possible toreach any firm conclusion about the effects of a substance on humans from testson other species. The practice of experimenting on non-human animals as itexists today throughout the world reveals the brutal consequences of speciesism(Singer 29). In this country everyone is supposed to be equal, but apparentlysome people just don^t have to obey the law. That is, in New York and some otherstates, licensed laboratories are immune from ordinary anticruelty laws, andthese places are often owned by state universities, city hospitals, or even TheUnited States Public Health Service. It seems suspicious that some governmentrun facilities could be ^immune^ from their own laws (Morse 19). In relation,^No law requires that cosmetics or household products betested on animals.Nevertheless, by six^o clock this evening, hundreds of animals will have theireyes, skin, or gastrointestinal systems unnecessarily burned or destroyed. Manyanimals will suffer and die this year to produce ^new^ versions of deodorant,hair spray, lipstick, nail polish, and lots of otherproducts^ (Sequoia 27).Some of the largest cosmetics companies use animals to test their products.These are just a couple of the horrifying tests they use, namely, the DrazieTest. The Drazie test is performed almost exclusively on albino rabbits. Theyare preferred because they are docile, cheap, and their eyes do not shed tears(so chemicals placed in them do not wash out). They are also the test subject ofchoice because their eyes are clear, making it easier to observe destruction ofeye tissue; their corneal membranes are extremely susceptible to injury. Duringeach test the rabbits are immobilized (usually in a ^stock^, with only theirheads protruding) and a solid or liquid is placed in the lower lid of one eye ofeach rabbit. These substances can range from mascara to aftershave to ovencleaner. The rabbits^ eyes remain clipped open. Anesthesia is almost neveradministered. After that, the rabbits are examined at intervals of one,twenty-four, forty-eight, seventy-two, and one hundred an sixty-eight hours.Reactions, which may range from severe inflammation, to clouding of the cornea,to ulceration and rupture of the eyeball, are recorded by technicians. Somestudies continue for a period of weeks. No other attempt is made to treat therabbits or to seek any antidotes. The rabbits who survive the Drazie test maythen be used as subjects for skin-inflammation tests (27). Another widely usedprocedure is the LD-50. This is the abbreviation of the Lethal Dose 50 test.LD-50 is the lethal dose of something that will kill fifty percent of allanimals in a group of forty to two hundred. Most commonly, animals areforce-feed substances (which may be toothpaste, shaving cream, drain cleaner,pesticides, or anything else they want to test) through a stomach tube andobserved for two weeks or until death. Non-oral methods of administering thetest include injection, forced inhalation, or application to animals skin.Symptoms routinely include tremors, convultions, vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis,or bleeding from the eyes, nose, mouth. Animals that survive are destroyed (29).Additionally, when one laboratory^s research on animals establishes somethingsignificant, scores of other labs repeat the experiment, and more thousands ofanimals are needlessly tortured and killed (Morse 8). Fewlabs buy their animaltest subjects from legitimate pet stores and the majority use illegal petdealers. There are many stolen animal dealers that house the animals before,during , and after testing. These ^farms^ most frequently hold animals betweentests while the animals recuperate, before facing another research ordeal. Theseso called farms in question are mainly old barn-like buildings used as hospitalsand convalescent (recovery) wards are filthy, overcrowded pens. At one farm inparticular dogs with open chest wounds and badly infected incisions, so weakthat many could not stand, were the order of the day. These dogs were^recuperating^ from open-heart and kidney surgery. Secondly, a litter oftwo-day-old pups were found in a basket, with no food provisions in sight (Morse19). In every pen there were dogs suffering from highly contagious diseases. Ananimal^s road to a lab is seldom a direct one. Whether he^s stolen picked up asa stray, or purchased, there^s a de tour first to the animal dealer^s farm;There he waits- never under satisfactory conditions- until his ride, and oftenlife, comes to an end at the laboratory (23). Every day of the year, hundreds ofthousands of fully conscious animals are scalded, or beaten, or crushed todeath, and more are subjected to exotic surgery and then allowed to die slowlyand in agony. There is no reason for this suffering to continue (Morse 8). Inconclusion, animal testing is inhumane and no animal should be forced to enduresuch torture. Waste in government is one thing; it seems to be an acceptedliability of democracy. But the wasting of lives is something else. How did itever get this way?BibliographyFox, Michael Allen. The Case For Animal Experimentation. Los Angeles：University Of California Press, 1986. Jasper, James M. and Dorothy Nelkin, eds.The Animal Rights Crusade. New York： Macmillion Inc., 1992, 103-56. Morse, Mel.Ordeal Of The Animals. Englewood Cliffs： Prentice-Hall International, 1968.Sequoia, Anna. 67 Ways To Save The Animals. New York： Harper Collins, 1990.Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. New York： Random House, 1975. OUTLINE I.Introduction II. Supporting evidence on testing A. Experiments funded by USgovernment 1. Strontium 90 2. Irradiation by X-rays 3. Methoxychlor B.Background on laws in US C. Examples of tests 1. The Drazie Test 2. The LD-50Test D. What the animals go through 1. Trip to the laboratory 2. Their stay atthe lab 3. After the tests are done III. Conclusion。
动物试验英文作文
动物试验英文作文英文：Animal testing is a highly controversial topic intoday's society. On one hand, it is argued that animal testing is necessary for medical research and the development of new drugs. On the other hand, many people believe that it is cruel and inhumane to subject animals to such testing.Personally, I believe that animal testing should be minimized as much as possible. While I understand the need for medical research and the development of new drugs, Ialso believe that there are alternative methods that can be used. For example, computer modeling and in vitro testing can provide valuable data without harming animals.Furthermore, we need to consider the ethicalimplications of animal testing. Animals are livingcreatures and should be treated with respect and compassion.It is not fair to subject them to pain and suffering for our own benefit.In addition, it is important to note that animaltesting is not always reliable. Animals are not the same as humans and the results of animal testing may not always be applicable to humans. This can lead to misleading results and potentially dangerous drugs being released onto the market.Overall, I believe that we need to find a balance between medical research and animal welfare. We should strive to minimize animal testing as much as possible and explore alternative methods. We should also ensure that animals used in testing are treated with respect and compassion.中文：动物试验是当今社会一个极具争议的话题。
如何看待动物实验英文作文
如何看待动物实验英文作文英文：Animal testing is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people argue that it is necessary for scientific research and medical advancements, while others believe it is cruel and inhumane. Personally, I believe that animal testing should be minimized as much as possible and alternative methods should be explored.One reason for my stance is that animals are living beings and should not be subjected to unnecessary harm and suffering. It is unethical to use animals for testing cosmetic products or other non-essential items. However, I understand that some medical research requires animal testing in order to develop treatments and cures for diseases. In these cases, I believe that strict regulations and guidelines should be put in place to ensure that animals are treated as humanely as possible.Another reason for my stance is that there are alternative methods that can be used instead of animal testing. For example, computer models and in vitro testing can be used to simulate the effects of drugs and chemicals on human cells. These methods are more cost-effective and do not involve the use of animals. In addition, they can provide more accurate results as they are based on human biology rather than animal biology.In conclusion, while I understand that animal testing has been used for many years and has contributed to important medical advancements, I believe that it should be minimized as much as possible. Animals should not be subjected to unnecessary harm and suffering, andalternative methods should be explored.中文：动物实验是一个备受争议的话题，已经争论了几十年。
动物实验做雅思作文
动物实验做雅思作文Animal testing, a topic surrounded by controversies, has been a part of medical and scientific research for centuries. It involves the use of animals to test new drugs, medical procedures, and chemicals, with the goal of improving human health and diseases.Despite the progress it has led to in the fields of medicine and science, animal testing is often criticized for its ethical concerns and the potential harm it causes to animals. Animal rights activists argue that animals have the right to live free from unnecessary suffering and Experimentation. They claim that alternative methods, such as computer simulations and cell cultures, could be used instead, which would cause less harm to animals.However, many scientists and researchers argue that animal testing is necessary and crucial for the advancement of medical knowledge. They believe that without animal testing, medical progress would be severely hindered, and many life-saving treatments and vaccines would not be possible. They also argue thatanimal models are essential for understanding the human body and diseases, and that replacing them with alternatives would not be as effective.In recent years, there has been a growing movement towards reducing the number of animals used in testing and finding alternatives to replace them. Many countries have implemented strict regulations and guidelines for animal testing, requiring researchers to minimize animal suffering and find alternatives when possible.In conclusion, animal testing is a complex and controversial issue. While it has contributed significantly to medical and scientific advancements, it also raises ethical concerns and questions about the treatment of animals. It is important to continue searching for alternatives and improving the ethical standards of animal testing to minimize the harm it causes.中文翻译:动物实验，一个充满争议的话题，已经成为医学和科学研究几个世纪的组成部分。
动物做实验英语作文
Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many years,with strong arguments on both sides.On one hand,it is argued that animal testing is essential for the development of new medicines and treatments,as well as for understanding diseases and their effects on living organisms.On the other hand,there are those who believe that it is cruel and unethical to subject animals to such procedures.The Importance of Animal Testing1.Medical Advancements:Animal testing plays a crucial role in the advancement of medical science.It allows researchers to test the safety and efficacy of new drugs and treatments before they are used on humans.This helps to ensure that any potential side effects or risks are identified and mitigated.2.Disease Understanding:Animals are often used to model human diseases.This helps scientists to understand the mechanisms of these diseases and to develop strategies for their treatment or prevention.3.Product Safety:Beyond medical research,animal testing is also used to ensure the safety of consumer products.This includes cosmetics,household items,and other products that humans come into contact with regularly.Ethical Concerns1.Animal Suffering:The primary ethical concern with animal testing is the potential suffering it causes to the animals involved.Many tests can be invasive and painful, leading to calls for more humane alternatives.2.Alternatives to Animal Testing:With the advancement of technology,there are now more alternatives available,such as in vitro testing,computer simulations,and the use of human cells and tissues.These methods can sometimes provide more accurate and relevant results than animal testing.3.Species Differences:Another ethical argument against animal testing is that results obtained from animals may not always be applicable to humans due to differences in physiology and metabolism.Balancing the Needs1.Regulatory Requirements:In many countries,animal testing is a legal requirement for the approval of new drugs and medical devices.This is to ensure public safety and theefficacy of the products.2.The3Rs Principle:The3Rs Replacement,Reduction,and Refinement is a widely accepted ethical framework for the use of animals in research.It encourages researchers to find alternative methods,reduce the number of animals used,and refine procedures to minimize pain and distress.3.Public Opinion:Public opinion on animal testing varies,with some supporting it for the greater good of human health,while others are strongly against it on ethical grounds.ConclusionWhile animal testing has been instrumental in many scientific and medical breakthroughs, it is essential to continue exploring and developing alternative methods that can reduce the reliance on animals.As society becomes more aware of animal welfare,the scientific community must strive to find a balance between the need for medical advancement and the ethical treatment of animals.。
动物试验英文作文
动物试验英文作文Animal testing is a controversial issue. Many people believe that it is necessary for scientific research and the development of new medicines. They argue that without animal testing, it would be impossible to ensure the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. On the other hand, there are those who oppose animal testing on ethical grounds, arguing that it is cruel and unnecessary.The use of animals in scientific research has been a long-standing practice. From mice and rats to dogs and monkeys, animals are used in a wide range of experiments. Proponents of animal testing argue that it is necessary to advance medical knowledge and develop new treatments for diseases. They also point out that strict regulations are in place to ensure that animals are treated humanely and that the benefits of animal testing outweigh the costs.However, opponents of animal testing argue that it is unethical to use animals in experiments, especially whenthere are alternative methods available. They point to the suffering that animals endure in laboratories and arguethat it is unjustifiable to subject them to pain and distress for the sake of human benefit. They also arguethat the results of animal testing are not always applicable to humans, and that alternative methods, such as cell cultures and computer modeling, can provide more accurate and reliable data.Despite the controversy, animal testing continues to be a common practice in scientific research. It is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While it is important to ensure the safety and efficacy of new drugs,it is also crucial to consider the ethical implications of using animals in experiments. As the debate continues, itis essential to explore alternative methods and strive for a balance between scientific progress and animal welfare.。
动物测试不应该被禁止英语作文
动物测试不应该被禁止英语作文Animal testing has long been a controversial topic, with many people advocating for its ban due to ethical concerns. However, I believe that animal testing should not be completely prohibited, as it plays a crucial role in scientific research and the development of new medical treatments.First and foremost, animal testing is essential for ensuring the safety and efficacy of new drugs and medical procedures before they are tested on humans. Many medications and treatments that we use today have undergone rigorous testing on animals to determine their potential side effects and effectiveness. Without animal testing, it would be impossible to guarantee the safety of these products for human use.Furthermore, animal testing is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge and understanding complex biological processes. By studying the effects of certain substances on animals, researchers can gain valuable insights into how these substances may affect humans. This information isvital for developing new treatments for diseases and conditions that currently have no cure.In addition, animal testing is also important for ensuring the quality and safety of consumer products. From cosmetics to household cleaners, many products undergo testing on animals to ensure that they are safe for use. Without this testing, consumers could be at risk of using products that may cause harm or have adverse effects.While I understand the concerns about the ethical implications of animal testing, it is important to recognize the significant contributions that it has made to scientific and medical advancements. By implementing strict regulations and ethical guidelines, we can ensure that animal testing is conducted in a humane and responsible manner.总的来说，我认为动物测试不应该被完全禁止，因为它在科学研究和新医疗治疗方法的发展中发挥着至关重要的作用。
动物试验的英语作文
动物试验的英语作文Title: The Ethical Dilemma of Animal Testing。
Animal testing has long been a contentious issue, raising profound ethical questions regarding the treatment of sentient beings in the pursuit of scientific knowledge and medical advancements. While some argue that it is a necessary evil for the progress of medicine and other fields, others vehemently oppose it on the grounds of animal rights and welfare. In this essay, we will explore both sides of the debate and examine the ethical implications of animal testing.Proponents of animal testing often cite its crucialrole in medical research and drug development. They argue that testing on animals allows scientists to understand the effects of new drugs and treatments, ensuring their safety and efficacy before they are administered to humans. Without animal testing, they claim, medical progress would be severely hindered, potentially leading to increasedhuman suffering and mortality.Moreover, advocates of animal testing contend that animals used in experiments are treated humanely, withstrict regulations in place to minimize their suffering. They argue that the benefits to human health outweigh the ethical concerns raised by animal rights activists. Additionally, they emphasize the lack of viablealternatives to animal testing, asserting that until reliable alternatives are developed, it remains a necessary practice.However, opponents of animal testing challenge these arguments on both ethical and practical grounds. They assert that subjecting animals to experimentation constitutes a violation of their intrinsic rights and dignity. Animals, they argue, possess the capacity to experience pain and suffering, and therefore, it is morally wrong to use them as mere means to an end.Furthermore, critics of animal testing question its scientific validity and relevance to human health. Theyargue that the physiological differences between animals and humans render the results of animal experiments unreliable and often misleading. Countless drugs that have shown promise in animal studies have ultimately failed in human clinical trials, highlighting the limitations of extrapolating data from one species to another.In addition, opponents of animal testing advocate for the development and implementation of alternative methods that do not involve the use of animals. These methods, such as in vitro testing, computer modeling, and human cell cultures, have shown promise in replicating human biology more accurately and ethically. Investing in these alternative approaches, they argue, not only spares countless animals from suffering but also leads to more reliable scientific outcomes.In light of these arguments, it is evident that the issue of animal testing is complex and multifaceted. While it is undeniable that animal testing has contributed to significant medical advancements, it is equally important to consider the ethical implications and explorealternative methods that minimize harm to animals.In conclusion, the ethical dilemma of animal testing forces us to confront difficult questions about the balance between scientific progress and animal welfare. As westrive to advance knowledge and improve human health, we must do so in a manner that respects the inherent value and rights of all sentient beings. Only then can we truly reconcile our pursuit of knowledge with our moral obligations towards other species.。
对动物试验的看法英语作文
对动物试验的看法英语作文Animal testing has long been a controversial topic, with strong arguments on both sides. Proponents argue that testing on animals is necessary for medical advancements and ensuring the safety of products before they are used by humans. They believe that without animal testing, we would not have many of the life-saving medications and treatments that we have today.However, opponents of animal testing raise ethical concerns about the treatment of animals in laboratories. They argue that animals have their own rights and should not be subjected to pain and suffering for the benefit of humans. Moreover, they question the reliability of using animals as models for human diseases, citing differences in biology that may limit the effectiveness of test results.In my opinion, while animal testing has contributed to significant scientific discoveries, it is crucial to find alternative methods that do not involve the use of animals. Advances in technology, such as organ-on-a-chip systems and computer simulations,offer promising alternatives that can provide valuable data without harming animals.Ultimately, the ethical considerations surrounding animal testing require a balance between scientific progress and compassion for living beings. By promoting the development and adoption of alternative testing methods, we can work towards a future where both human health and animal welfare are prioritized.中文翻译：动物试验众说纷纭，长期以来备受争议。
雅思写作范文及素材：animaltest
雅思写作范文及素材：animaltest雅思考生们在练习雅思大作文的时候，不仅仅要掌握各类技巧以及一些用词，还应该看看满分作文，寻找到自己的差距，加以改进。
以下便是小编整理的雅思写作animal testing范文及素材。
雅思写作满分范文animal testing一、题目Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.二、分析题目大意是指，如今动物做实验已经在研究新药或者测试产品安全性等方面被广泛使用。
有些人认为这样的实验应该被禁止，因为让动物承受这样的痛苦从道德层面来说是不正确的，但是有些人则是认为它们给人类带来了很大的帮助。
讨论这两个观点，并且给出你自己的观点。
这道题目的要求是“Discuss”，即需要对于两方面的观点都要进行讨论分析，缺一不可。
考生需要做的，是对于用动物做实验这一行为的利弊分析，通过列举比较，得出一个比较具有说服力的结论。
三、范文It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.第一段介绍背景，引出话题，说明用动物来测试药物或者其他产品的可使用性是十分常见的现象。
是否禁止动物保护雅思作文
是否禁止动物保护雅思作文Animal testing has long been a controversial topic, with strong arguments both for and against it. While some believe that animal testing is necessary for scientific research and medical advancements, others argue that it is unethical and inhumane. In my opinion, I believe that animal testing should be banned for several reasons.First and foremost, animals have the capacity to feel pain and suffer, just like humans. Subjecting them to experiments that cause pain and distress is morally wrong and goes against the principles of compassion and empathy. Animals should not be sacrificed for the benefit of humans.Secondly, there are many alternative methods available today that can replace animal testing. Advances in technology have led to the development of innovative techniques such as cell cultures, computer modeling, and human organ-on-a-chip systems, which can provide more accurate and reliable results without harming animals.Furthermore, the results of animal testing are often not directly applicable to humans due to physiological and genetic differences between species. This raises ethical concerns about the validity and reliability of usinganimals as models for human diseases and drug testing.In conclusion, I strongly believe that animal testing should be banned. We must prioritize the ethical treatment of animals and seek alternative methods that are more humane and scientifically sound. By embracing cruelty-free research practices, we can protect the well-being of animals while advancing scientific knowledge and medical progress.中文翻译：长期以来，动物实验一直是一个具有争议性的话题，有人支持，有人反对。
英文作文动物被实验
英文作文动物被实验英文：Animal testing has been a controversial topic for decades. While some argue that it is necessary for medical research and the development of new drugs, others believe that it is cruel and unnecessary. As for me, I believe that animal testing should be banned.Firstly, animals are sentient beings and should not be subjected to unnecessary pain and suffering. Many animals used in testing are kept in small cages and subjected to painful procedures without any pain relief. This is not only cruel, but also unethical.Secondly, animal testing is not always accurate. Animals have different physiologies and reactions to drugs than humans, which can lead to incorrect results. For example, the drug thalidomide was tested on animals and was deemed safe, but when given to pregnant women, it causedbirth defects in their babies.Finally, there are now alternative methods to animal testing, such as computer modeling and in vitro testing. These methods are not only more humane, but also more accurate and cost-effective.In conclusion, animal testing is cruel, inaccurate, and unnecessary. It is time for us to move towards more humane and effective methods of research.中文：动物实验已经成为了一个争议不断的话题。
雅思范文赏析：AnimalTesting（第一篇）
Topic：Animal testing may be necessary， but we need to be be merciful Every year， millions of animals undergo painful suffering or death as a result of scientific research into the effects of drugs， food additives， cosmetics and other chemical products. While most people think animal testing is necessary，others are upset by what they see as needless suffering. This essay looks at some of the positive and negative aspects of animal testing. Many medical treatments and procedures have been developed from experiments on animals. Since animals share many features with humans， scientists use animals to test the safety and effectiveness of newly developed drugs before pilot testing on small groups of patients. Medical teams practice new operating techniques such as transplants on animals. Without animal testing， many procedures or new drugs would be extremely unsafe. However， many people are concerned that animals are suffering unnecessarily and cruelly. They do not believe that every new drug needs to be tested on animals， especially with the huge database of knowledge and modern computer models. They also are worried that many animal tests are ineffective， pointing out that any drugs have had to be withdrawn from the market despite extensive testing. They particularly feel that animal testing should not be used for non-essential products such as cosmetics， shampoos， soaps， and cleaning products. Furthermore， some campaigners would like to see certain tests replaced and more humane methods used. We need to make sure that the millions of animals who are used for testing new products are treated with the minimum of suffering. Although some animal testing may be unavoidable at present， treating our fellow creatures as mercifully as possible will demonstrate our humanity. 267 words。
对动物试验的看法英语作文
Opinion on Animal TestingAnimal testing has been a controversial topic for decades, sparking debates among individuals, organizations, and governments. While some argue that it is necessary for scientific progress and medical advancements, others are strongly opposed to it, citing ethical and moral reasons. In this essay, I will express my own看法 on animal testing, considering both the pros and cons involved.Firstly, let's examine the reasons why animal testing is necessary. In the field of medical research, animals are often used as surrogates for human beings to test drugs, treatments, and procedures. This is because the physiological and biological processes of animals, especially those closely related to humans like primates and rodents, can provide valuable insights into how the human body will respond to certain stimuli. Animal testing helps scientists identify potential side effects, toxicities, and efficacy of drugs before they are tested on humans. This precautionary measure ensures the safety of human subjects and reduces the risk of unexpected reactions or harmful effects.Moreover, animal testing has led to many medical breakthroughs and saved countless lives. For instance, the development of vaccines and anticancer drugs often involved animal testing at some stage. Without these experiments, we might not have had effective treatments for many diseases that affect humans.However, despite its benefits, animal testing raises serious ethical and moral concerns. Animals, being sentient beings, deserve respect and compassion. They feel pain, fear, and distress just like humans do. Subjecting them to painful and stressful procedures for the sake of human advancement is considered unethical by many. Additionally, animals in laboratories are often confined in small cages, deprived of their natural habitats and social interactions, leading to psychological distress.Alternative methods to animal testing are being explored and developed. These include the use of computer models, tissue cultures, and in vitro testing. While these methods may not provide the same level of accuracy and realism as animal testing, they do offer a more humane and ethical approach to scientific research.In conclusion, my看法 on animal testing is that while it has played a crucial role in medical progress, we need to strike a balance between scientific advancement and animal welfare. We should prioritize the development and implementation of alternative methods to reduce the need for animal testingwhenever possible. Additionally, we should ensure that animals used in research are treated with compassion and respect, minimizing their suffering and ensuring their well-being.。
雅思范文赏析：AnimalTesting（第3篇）
Advantages of Animal Testing in Medical ResearchMedical research involving animals has dramatically improved the health of the human race. Without animal testing, the cure for polio would not exist and diabetics would suffer or die from their disease. Despite these benefits, some people believe that animals should be not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. This essay will outline the advantages of animal testing.Animal testing allows scientists to test and create new drugs. Animals such as monkeys or rabbits have similar physical processes to humans. This allows scientists to test the effects of certain drugs. If a drug produces adverse effects in animals it is probably unfit for human use.Animal testing is cheap. There is a large supply of animals for medical research. Animals are easily bred, and maintained safely in controlled labs. The costs of testing in humans would be extremely high.Many people argue that animal testing is cruel. In some cases this is true. However it would be much more cruel to test new drugs on people or children, or to let people die because there was not enough information about a drug. Furthermore, legislation in most countries sets standards for animal treatment, and laboratories have guidelines to prevent cruelty. Opponents of animal research also say that information from animals does not apply to humans. They point to certain commercial drugs which have been withdrawn because of side-effects in humans While it is true that animal systems differ from human systems, there are enough similarities to apply information from animals to humans.Animal rights campaigners claim that we don’t need new tests because we already have vast amounts of information. However, many new deadly infections appear every year and new treatments and drugs are needed to combat these deadly plagues.Animal testing is needed in the world we live in. Our responsibility is to manage the animals in our care and balance their suffering against the good that comes from them. 321 words。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
states, licensed laboratories are immune from ordinary anticruelty laws, and
(so chemicals placed in them do not wash out). They are also the test subject of
choice because their eyes are clear, making it easier to observe destruction of
thousands of other experiments performed in the US each year. Limiting it to
just experiments done on beagles, the following might sock most people: For
extremely sick. Also, these experiments are parts of series of similar
experiments, repeated with only minor variations, that are being carried out all
over the country. These experiments Do Not save human lives or improve them in
any way. It was already known that Strontium 90 is unhealthy before the beagles
human could ever consume) would cause damage. In any case, as the differing
results they obtained on pigs and dogs make it clear, it is not possible to
died; and the experimenters who poisoned dogs and pigs with Methoxychlor knew
beforehand that the large amounts they were feeding the animals (amounts no
instance, at the Lovelace Foundatiommission. In this experiment Twenty-five of the dogs
eventually died. One of the deaths occurred during an epileptic seizure; another
Later, they hemorrhaged from the mouth, nose, and eyes. In their report, the
experimenters compared their experiment to others of the same nature that each
animals initiated another convulsion. After further experimentation on an
additional twenty beagles, the experimenters concluded that massive daily doses
and irradiated them with different levels of radiation by x-rays. Twenty-one of
the dogs died within the first two weeks. The experimenters determined the dose
exists today throughout the world reveals the brutal consequences of speciesism
(Singer 29). In this country everyone is supposed to be equal, but apparently
from a brain hemorrhage. Other dogs, before death, became feverish and anemic,
lost their appetites, and had hemorrhages. The experimenters in their published
reach any firm conclusion about the effects of a substance on humans from tests
on other species. The practice of experimenting on non-human animals as it
to ulceration and rupture of the eyeball, are recorded by technicians. Some
studies continue for a period of weeks. No other attempt is made to treat the
way of fighting back. This is why there should be new laws to protect them.
These legislations also need to be enforced more regularly. Too many criminals
rabbits or to seek ahe Drazie test may
report, compared their results with that of other experiments conducted at the
University of Utah and the Argonne National Laboratory in which beagles were
get away with murder. Although most labs are run by private companies, often
experiments are conducted by public organizations. The US government, Army and
these places are often owned by state s or household products be tested on animals.
Nevertheless, by sixclock this evening, hundreds of animals will have their
they passed out from lack of oxygen. Upon recovery from an episode of
convulsions and collapse, the dogs were uncoordinated, apparently blind, and any
stimulus such as dropping a feeding pan, squirting water, or touching the
eyes, skin, or gastrointestinal systems unnecessarily burned or destroyed. Many
animals will suffer andple of the horrifying tests they use, namely, the Drazie
eye tissue; their corneal membranes are extremely susceptible to injury. During
eReactions, which may range from severe inflammation, to clouding of the cornea,
Air force in particular, has designed and carried out many animal experiments.
The purposed experiments were engineered so that many animals would suffer and
used around seven hundred dogs. The experimenters said that the injurienvolutions.
Dogs in convultions breathed as rapidly as two hundred times a minute before
injectnce than dogs forced to inhale it. Also, at the University of Rochester
School Of Medicine a group of experimenters put fifty beagles in wooden boxes
banned. They have rights just as we do. Twenty-four hours a day humans are using
defenseless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals have no
at which fifty percent of the animals will die with ninety-five percent