甲烷转化

合集下载

甲烷水蒸汽转化

甲烷水蒸汽转化

天然气转化天然气转化甲烷水蒸汽转化(sMR)甲烷水蒸汽转化工艺(SMR)作为传统的甲烷制合成气过程(图1一2),主要涉及下述反应:CH4+H2O!3H2+COvH298K=206.29kJ/mol这是一个强吸热过程,转化一般要在高温下进行(>1073K)"产物中HZ/Co约为3:1,为防止催化剂积炭,通常需要通入过量的水蒸汽,依合成气用途,原料气中HZO/CH4典型的摩尔比为2-5;并且为保持较高的生产速率,工业生产中压力通常高3.OMPa。

该反应过程的缺点是能耗高,设备庞大复杂!占地面积大,投资和操作费用昂贵。

联合转化工艺(SM侧oZR)联合重整工艺流程如图1-3所示,将SMR反应器出口的混合气送入二级氧化反应器内,未完全消耗的甲烷(在SMR出口处CH;转化率为90-92%)与0:发生部分氧化反应后,再进一步通过催化剂床层进行二次重整反应,生成的合成气HZ/CO 比在2.5~4.0,随后利用水汽转化(WGS)反应(见式4),调整产品中H:和CO比例,来满足下游合成的利用。

该工艺有效地减小了SRM的规模,降低了能耗,但不足之处是仍需两个反应器。

CH4+HZO03H2+COvH29sK=一4IkJ/mol中国石化集团四川维尼纶厂目前在运行的甲醇装置有两套,一为1996年建成投产的直接以天然气为原料的10万t/a甲醇装置,另一为2011年整合建成投产的以乙炔尾气为原料的77万t/a甲醇装置。

前者采用成熟的管式转化炉生产合成气,并利用德国Lurgi合成工艺技术生产甲醇;后者利用英国Davy公司合成工艺生产甲醇,并在合成环路驰放气的处理上采用了膜分离与ATR 转化工艺技术,以提高装置产能和降低综合能耗。

10万t/a甲醇装置通过天然气蒸汽转化制取合成气,故合成气具有氢多、碳少、惰性气体(CH4、N2、Ar 等)含量低的特点,其气质组成有利于甲醇合成反应。

77万t/a 甲醇装置以乙炔尾气为原料,由于乙炔尾气属于天然气部分氧化法制乙炔工艺的副产气,因而具有氢少、碳多、惰性气体含量偏高的特点,属于乏氢气质,需对系统进行补氢。

甲烷转化的基础知识

甲烷转化的基础知识

甲烷转化的基础知识一、甲烷部分氧化(POM):甲烷部分氧化(POM)制合成气的一个优势是温和的放热反应。

在750~800℃下,甲烷平衡转化率可达90%以上,CO和H2的选择性高达95%,反应接触时间短(下于10-2s),可避免高温非催化部分氧化法伴生的燃烧反应,生成合成气的CO和H2摩尔比接近2,适合于甲醇生产要求。

二、甲烷转化的化学反应:甲烷部分氧化制合成气的总反应式如下:CH4+ 1/2O2=CO+2H2+35.5kJ/mol但实际反应过程非常复杂,而且伴有一些副反应发生,包括氧化反应、重整反应、水煤气变换反应以及积炭和消炭反应等。

①氧化反应CH4 + 2O2=CO2+2H2O +802kJ/molCH4 + 3/2O2=CO+2H2O +519kJ/molCH4 + 1/2O2= CO2+H2+561kJ/molCH4 + 3/2O2= CO2+2H2+319kJ/molH2+ 1/2O2= H2O +241.83kJ/molCH4+ O2=CO+ H2O +H2+278kJ/mol②重整反应CH4+ H2O≒CO+3H2-206kJ/molCH4+ CO2≒2CO+2H2-247kJ/mol③水煤气变换反应CO+ H2O≒CO2+H2+41.2kJ/mol④积炭和消炭反应CH4≒C+H2-74.9 kJ/mol2CO≒CO2+C +172.4 kJ/molC+ H2O≒CO +H2-131.36 kJ/mol三、甲烷部分氧化制合成气反应的平衡常数:甲烷部分氧化制合成气反应的平衡常数可用下面公式表示:k p= (p CO·p H22) / (p CH4·p O21/2)式中k p——甲烷部分氧化制合成气反应的平衡常数p CH4、p CO、p H2、p O2——分别表示甲烷、一氧化碳、氢气、氧气的平衡分压。

对甲烷部分氧化制合成气反应CH4+ 1/2O2=CO+2H2用公式计算结果的平衡。

甲烷水蒸汽转化

甲烷水蒸汽转化

天然气转化天然气转化甲烷水蒸汽转化(sMR)甲烷水蒸汽转化工艺(SMR)作为传统的甲烷制合成气过程(图1一2),主要涉及下述反应:CH4+H20!3H2+C0vH298K=206.29kJ/mol这是一个强吸热过程,转化一般要在高温下进行(>1073K)〃产物中HZ/Co约为3:1,为防止催化剂积炭,通常需要通入过量的水蒸汽,依合成气用途,原料气839KFuel和■Caaly:!tubesStackEffluentgasNaturalgas图1-2SMR示意图Figure1-2Theschematicof SMR中HZO/CH4典型的摩尔比为2-5;并且为保持较高的生产速率,工业生产中压力通常高3.0MPa。

该反应过程的缺点是能耗高,设备庞大复杂!占地面积大,投资和操作费用昂贵。

联合转化工艺(SM侧oZR)联合重整工艺流程如图1-3所示,将SMR反应器出口的混合气送入二级氧化反应器内,未完全消耗的甲烷(在SMR出口处CH;转化率为90-92%)与0:发生部分氧化反应后,再进一步通过催化剂床层进行二次重整反应,生成的合成气HZ/CO 比在2.5~4.0,随后利用水汽转化(WGS )反应(见式4),调整产品中H:和CO 比例,来满足下游合成的利用。

该工艺有效地减小了SRM 的规模,降低了能耗,但不足之处是仍需两个反应器。

CH4+HZ003H2+C0vH29sK 二一4IkJ/molFigure1-3The blockdiagramfor5MR/OR中国石化集团四川维尼纶厂目前在运行的甲醇装置有两套,一为1996年建成投产的直接以天然气为原料的10万t/a 甲醇装置,另一为2011年整合建成投产的以乙炔尾气为原料的77万t/a 甲醇装置。

前者采用成熟的管式转化炉生产合成气,并利用德国Lurgi 合成工艺技术生产甲醇;后者利用英国Davy 公司合成工艺生产甲醇,并在合成环路驰放气的处理上采用了膜分离与ATR 转化工艺技术,以提高装置产能和降低综合能耗。

甲烷转化原理

甲烷转化原理

甲烷转化原理
甲烷(CH4)转化是指将甲烷分子转化为其他化合物的化学反应。

甲烷转化的原理可以通过以下几种途径实现:
1. 甲烷部分氧化:将甲烷与氧气反应,生成一氧化碳(CO)和水(H2O)。

这种反应通常需要高温和催化剂的存在。

一氧化碳是一种具有重要工业应用的化学物质。

2. 甲烷完全氧化:将甲烷与足够的氧气反应,生成二氧化碳(CO2)和水。

这是甲烷在自然条件下最常见的反应路径,也是燃烧的过程。

3. 甲烷部分氟化:将甲烷与光气(Cl2)或氟气反应,生成氯化甲烷(CH3Cl)或氟化甲烷(CH3F)。

这种反应常用于有机合成领域。

4. 甲烷裂解:在高温和催化剂的作用下,将甲烷分解成较小的碳氢化合物,如乙烯(C2H4)和丙烷(C3H6)。

这种反应被广泛用于生产石墨烯等碳材料。

5. 甲烷转化为甲醇:通过甲烷催化氧化反应,将甲烷转化为甲醇(CH3OH)。

这种反应是甲烷利用的重要途径之一,甲醇是一种常用的工业原料和能源载体。

以上是甲烷转化的几种原理,具体的反应条件和催化剂选择取决于所需产物和反应的具体目的。

不同的反应路径可以实现对甲烷的有效利用和价值提升。

甲烷的取代概念

甲烷的取代概念

甲烷的取代概念甲烷是一种简单的有机化合物,由一个碳原子和四个氢原子组成。

甲烷的化学结构使其具有很高的稳定性和燃烧性能,因此被广泛应用于燃料和能源产业。

然而,由于甲烷是一种温室气体,它的排放对全球气候变化产生了很大影响。

为了减少甲烷对环境的危害,人们开始研究和应用甲烷的取代概念。

甲烷的取代概念是指将甲烷用其他较环保的能源或化合物替代,从而减少温室气体排放和环境污染。

目前,有几种主要的取代方法被广泛研究和应用。

首先,一种常见的取代方法是将甲烷转化为氢气。

氢气是一种环保的燃料,燃烧后只产生水蒸汽,没有有害气体排放。

将甲烷转化为氢气的常用方法是蒸汽重整,即在高温和催化剂的作用下,甲烷与水反应生成氢气和二氧化碳。

此外,通过甲烷化学链,也可以将甲烷转化为其他有机化合物,如甲醇、乙烯等,这些有机化合物在工业生产和能源领域有广泛的应用。

其次,一种较为新颖的甲烷取代方式是利用生物技术将甲烷转化为有机化合物。

甲烷是一种天然气,广泛存在于油气田中。

利用生物修复和生物转化的方法,可以利用一些特殊的微生物将甲烷转化为有机酸、脂肪酸和有机溴化物等有机化合物。

这些有机化合物可以作为化工原料,减少对石油的依赖,同时降低温室气体排放。

此外,一种取代甲烷的方法是将其用作化学反应的中间体。

甲烷作为一种高碳化合物,在合成化学反应中具有重要的催化作用。

通过合成化学反应,甲烷可以被转化为甲酸、甲基异氰酸酯等有机化合物,这些有机化合物可以用于制备药品、塑料、涂料等化工产品。

最后,一种较为具有挑战性的甲烷取代方法是利用太阳能或风能等可再生能源将甲烷直接合成为其他有机化合物。

这种方法需要高能输入来促进甲烷分子的活化和化学反应,从而将其转化为其他有机物。

对于这种方法的研究和开发,有助于改善能源转换效率和减少环境污染。

总之,甲烷的取代概念是多领域研究的热点之一。

通过将甲烷转化为氢气、其他有机化合物、利用生物技术、作为化学反应中间体或利用可再生能源,可以减少甲烷带来的环境污染和气候变化问题。

甲烷制甲醇反应方程式

甲烷制甲醇反应方程式

甲烷制甲醇反应方程式甲烷制甲醇反应是一种重要的化学反应,它可以通过在一定条件下将甲烷转化为甲醇。

甲醇是一种广泛应用于工业和化学领域的有机化合物,具有重要的经济价值。

甲烷制甲醇反应的化学方程式如下:CH4 + H2O → CO + 3H2CO + 2H2 → CH3OH这个反应过程一般分为两个步骤。

首先,甲烷与水反应生成一氧化碳和氢气。

然后,一氧化碳和氢气再反应生成甲醇。

具体来说,甲烷与水反应的过程如下:甲烷和水在一定的温度和压力下进入反应器中,通过催化剂的作用,甲烷中的碳氢键被断裂,生成一氧化碳和氢气。

这个过程称为甲烷重整反应。

一氧化碳和氢气再反应生成甲醇的过程如下:一氧化碳和氢气在一定的温度和压力下进入反应器中,通过催化剂的作用,发生羰基化反应,生成甲醇。

甲烷制甲醇反应是一种复杂的反应过程,涉及到多个中间产物和催化剂的作用。

催化剂在反应中起到了至关重要的作用,它能够促进反应的进行,提高反应速率和产率。

甲烷制甲醇反应在工业中有着广泛的应用。

甲醇是一种重要的化工原料,可以用于生产塑料、涂料、溶剂等产品。

此外,甲醇还可以作为清洗剂、燃料和氢气的储存介质等。

甲烷制甲醇反应的研究对于提高能源利用效率、减少污染排放具有重要意义。

通过优化反应条件和催化剂性能,可以提高反应的选择性和产率,降低能耗和污染物排放。

甲烷制甲醇反应是一种重要的化学反应,通过将甲烷转化为甲醇,可以获得广泛应用的有机化合物。

这个反应过程涉及到多个步骤和催化剂的作用,对于工业生产和环境保护都具有重要意义。

通过继续研究和优化,可以进一步提高反应效率和产率,促进可持续发展。

甲烷干重整反应转化率和输入功率

甲烷干重整反应转化率和输入功率

甲烷干重整反应转化率和输入功率下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。

文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!本店铺为大家提供各种类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you! In addition, this shop provides you with various types of practical materials, such as educational essays, diary appreciation, sentence excerpts, ancient poems, classic articles, topic composition, work summary, word parsing, copy excerpts, other materials and so on, want to know different data formats and writing methods, please pay attention!甲烷干重整反应转化率与输入功率的关系分析摘要:甲烷干重整反应是一种重要的化工过程,其转化率直接受到输入功率的影响。

甲烷二氧化碳重整转化率

甲烷二氧化碳重整转化率

甲烷二氧化碳重整转化率是指通过催化反应将甲烷和二氧化碳转化为合成气的过程中,所转化的甲烷和二氧化碳的比例。

重整转化率是衡量该反应效率的重要指标之一,对于评估催化剂性能和反应条件的优化具有重要意义。

下面将从定义、影响因素和提高方法等方面进行详细介绍。

一、定义甲烷二氧化碳重整转化率(Methane Carbon Dioxide Reforming Conversion)是指在催化剂的作用下,甲烷与二氧化碳发生重整反应生成一氧化碳和氢气的过程中,所转化的甲烷和二氧化碳的比例。

通常用百分比表示,计算公式如下:转化率(%) = (转化物摩尔数/进料物摩尔数) × 100%二、影响因素1. 催化剂选择:催化剂是甲烷二氧化碳重整反应的关键因素之一。

常用的催化剂包括镍、钯、铂等金属催化剂及其复合催化剂。

催化剂的活性、稳定性和选择性会直接影响转化率的高低。

2. 反应温度:反应温度是甲烷二氧化碳重整反应中另一个重要的影响因素。

适当的反应温度可以提高反应速率,但过高的温度可能导致催化剂失活或副反应的发生。

因此,选择合适的反应温度对于提高转化率非常关键。

3. 反应压力:反应压力对甲烷二氧化碳重整反应的平衡态有一定的影响。

较高的压力可以促进产物生成,但过高的压力会增加系统能耗和设备成本。

因此,需要在经济性和转化率之间进行平衡考虑。

4. 气体比例:甲烷和二氧化碳的进料比例也是影响重整转化率的重要因素之一。

适当的甲烷和二氧化碳比例可以提高转化率,但过高或过低的比例都会导致反应效果下降。

三、提高方法1. 催化剂设计:通过催化剂的合理设计和改性,可以提高催化剂的活性和稳定性,从而提高重整转化率。

例如,采用贵金属与载体的复合结构,可以增加催化剂的活性位点和抗积碳能力。

2. 反应条件优化:通过调节反应温度和压力,优化甲烷二氧化碳重整反应的条件,可以提高转化率。

适当的反应温度和压力可以促进反应的进行,并在转化率和能耗之间取得平衡。

第七部分 甲烷转化

第七部分 甲烷转化

气综合利用途径。
在间接法中,首要的问题是研究和开发天然气制合成气的廉价 新工艺。一般天然气经合成气再合成液体燃料和化学品,其中制合 成气过程的投资和生产费用约占全过程的60%~70%。因此改进造 气过程对提高后续加工过程的经济效益意义重大。
3、甲烷转化制合成气的主要方法
C-H: 416 kJ/mol
石油化工过程相竞争,短期内很难实现工业化。所以,近年来, 天然气经由合成气的间接转化利用再次成为世界各国研究的重点。
目前,以合成气为原料的许多化工合成过程已实现大规模生
产,并具有重大的工业意义。 由 Mobil公司和 Shell公司开发成功的由天然气经合成气制取 汽油和柴油的MTG和和1994年在马来西亚建立了工业生产装置。 最近,Amoco和Haldor Topsoe己合作开发了二甲醚作为柴油机 燃料的新技术,二甲醚被誉为是二十一世纪的新燃料。
甲烷转化制合成气的主要方法有:
1.蒸汽重整法 2.联合重整法
3.非催化部分氧化法
4.自热重整法 5.催化部分氧化法
蒸汽重整法,在工业生产上已应用几十年,技术上己趋于成熟。
该反应是一强吸热反应,该法的特点为生产的合成气中H2 的含量高, 是工业上合成氨原料气---氢的主要来源。缺点是产生的合成气因H2/
第七部分
甲烷部分氧化制合成气 甲烷氧化偶联
甲烷催化芳构化
1、研究意义
半个多世纪以来,由于石油资源的长期大量开采,储量已日
趋匮乏。据专家估计,到2020年,石油在世界能源结构中的比例
将从目前的41%下降为20%,而天然气将从目前的22%增长到45 %左右(见表1-1),成为21世纪初最主要的能源。为了适应未来
化剂,给出的活性顺序为:Ni/A12O3 >Ni/MgO>Ni/CaO。在常压、 700℃、CH4 /O2 =2:5*105h-1 空速条件下,这三种催化剂上都可得

甲烷热分解方程式

甲烷热分解方程式

甲烷热分解方程式甲烷热分解是指甲烷分子在高温条件下发生分解反应,生成其他化合物或元素。

甲烷(CH4)是一种无色、无臭的气体,主要由碳和氢组成。

热分解是指在高温条件下,分子内部的键断裂,使分子结构发生改变。

甲烷热分解是一个重要的化学反应,对于研究燃烧、能源转换和环境污染等领域具有重要意义。

甲烷热分解的化学方程式可以表示为:CH4 → C + 2H2根据上述方程式可知,甲烷在高温下分解成碳和氢气。

其中产生的碳可以形成固体炭,而氢气则以气体形式释放出来。

甲烷热分解反应是一个典型的热解反应,需要提供足够的能量才能使分子内部的键断裂。

在高温条件下,甲烷分子中的碳氢键会被断裂,生成碳原子和氢原子。

这个过程需要消耗能量,并且是一个可逆反应,即碳和氢也可以重新结合形成甲烷分子。

甲烷热分解反应的具体机理还不完全清楚,但一般认为它经历了几个步骤。

首先,甲烷分子吸收能量,使得碳氢键变得不稳定。

接着,碳氢键中的碳氢键断裂,形成碳原子和氢原子。

碳原子与周围的分子发生反应,形成固体炭。

而氢原子则以气体形式释放出来。

甲烷热分解反应是一个重要的化学反应,具有广泛的应用价值。

首先,它是燃烧反应的基础。

甲烷是一种常见的燃料,当它在氧气存在下燃烧时,会发生热分解反应,产生二氧化碳和水。

其次,甲烷热分解反应也与能源转换有关。

甲烷是一种重要的天然气资源,通过甲烷热分解可以将其转化为氢气,作为清洁能源使用。

此外,甲烷热分解还与环境污染有关。

例如,甲烷是一种温室气体,通过了解其热分解反应机理,可以更好地控制和减少甲烷的排放,从而减少温室效应。

总结起来,甲烷热分解是指甲烷分子在高温条件下发生分解反应,生成碳和氢气。

这个反应是一个重要的化学反应,对于研究燃烧、能源转换和环境污染等领域具有重要意义。

通过了解甲烷热分解反应的机理,可以更好地应用和控制这个反应,以实现能源转换和环境保护的目标。

甲烷化法名词解释

甲烷化法名词解释

甲烷化法名词解释
甲烷化法是一种化学反应方法,可以将甲烷(CH4)转化为其他有机化合物。

甲烷是一种无色、无臭的气体,是天然气的主要成分之一。

它在甲烷化法中经过一系列化学反应,可以转化为各种有机物,如乙烷、乙炔等。

甲烷化法常用于工业生产中,用于合成化学品、能源生产等领域。

它具有高效、低成本等优点,被广泛应用。

甲烷化法的反应过程通常在高温和催化剂的存在下进行。

不同的催化剂和反应条件可以得到不同的产物。

甲烷化法在环保方面也具有一定的意义。

通过甲烷化法,可以将甲烷转化为其他有机物,减少甲烷气体的排放,对环境产生较小的影响。

凯洛格甲烷蒸汽转化工艺流程

凯洛格甲烷蒸汽转化工艺流程

凯洛格甲烷蒸汽转化工艺流程下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成,希望大家下载以后,能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改,请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,如想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copy excerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!凯洛格甲烷蒸汽转化工艺是一种在高温、高压和催化剂存在的条件下,将甲烷与水蒸气反应生成合成气(syngas,主要成分为一氧化碳和氢气)的工艺。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

K.M.Shen for helpful discussions and communications.Experimental studies were supported by the Center for Emergent Superconductivity,an Energy Frontier Research Center,headquartered at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)and funded by the U.S.Department of Energy under grant DE-2009-BNL-PM015,as well as by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Science and Education (Japan)and the Global Centers of Excellence Program for Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.C.K.K.acknowledges support from the FlucTeam program at BNL under contractDE-AC02-98CH10886.J.L.acknowledges support from the Institute for Basic Science,Korea.I.A.F.acknowledges support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia,Portugal,under fellowship number SFRH/BD/60952/2009.S.M.acknowledges support from NSF grant DMR-1120296to the Cornell Center for Materials Research.Theoretical studies at Cornell University were supported by NSF grant DMR-1120296to CornellCenter for Materials Research and by NSF grant DMR-0955822.The original data are archived by Davis Group,BNL,and Cornell University.Supplementary Materials/content/344/6184/612/suppl/DC1Materials and Methods Supplementary Text Figs.S1to S9References (42–45)Movies S1and S221November 2013;accepted 20March 201410.1126/science.1248783Direct,Nonoxidative Conversion of Methane to Ethylene,Aromatics,and HydrogenXiaoguang Guo,1Guangzong Fang,1Gang Li,2,3Hao Ma,1Hongjun Fan,2Liang Yu,1Chao Ma,4Xing Wu,5Dehui Deng,1Mingming Wei,1Dali Tan,1Rui Si,6Shuo Zhang,6Jianqi Li,4Litao Sun,5Zichao Tang,2Xiulian Pan,1Xinhe Bao 1*The efficient use of natural gas will require catalysts that can activate the first C –H bond ofmethane while suppressing complete dehydrogenation and avoiding overoxidation.We report that single iron sites embedded in a silica matrix enable direct,nonoxidative conversion ofmethane,exclusively to ethylene and aromatics.The reaction is initiated by catalytic generation of methyl radicals,followed by a series of gas-phase reactions.The absence of adjacent iron sites prevents catalytic C-C coupling,further oligomerization,and hence,coke deposition.At 1363kelvin,methane conversion reached a maximum at 48.1%and ethylene selectivity peaked at 48.4%,whereas the total hydrocarbon selectivity exceeded 99%,representing an atom-economical transformation process of methane.The lattice-confined single iron sites delivered stable performance,with no deactivation observed during a 60-hour test.The challenge of converting natural gas into transportable fuels and chemicals (1)has been spurred by several emerging indus-trial trends,including rapidly rising demand for H 2(for upgrading lower-quality oils)and a global shortage of aromatics caused by shifting refinery targets toward gasoline.Light olefins,which are key chemical feedstocks,are currently made from methanol,which itself is made through multistage catalytic transformations via syngas (a mixture of H 2and CO)(2,3),although there is also ongoing research to convert syngas directly to light olefins (4,5).However,in all such approaches,either CO or H 2is needed to remove oxygen from CO,result-ing in a carbon-atom utilization efficiency below 50%.Despite their low efficiency,high capital and production costs,and enormous CO 2emissions,syngas routes dominate current and near-term in-dustrial practices for natural gas conversion (6,7).Direct conversion of CH 4is potentially more economical and environmentally friendly but is challenging because CH 4exhibits high C –H bond strength (434kJ/mol),negligible electron affinity,large ionization energy,and low polarizability (8).In the pioneering work of Keller and Bhasin in the early 1980s,CH 4was activated with the assistance of oxygen (9).This finding initiated a worldwide research surge to explore the high-temperature (>1073K)oxidative coupling of methane (OCM)to C 2hydrocarbons (10,11).Hundreds of catalytic materials have since been synthesized and tested,principally during the 1990s,as well as in recent years.Unfortunately,the presence of O 2leads irreversibly to overoxidation,resulting in a large amount of the thermodynamically stable end-products CO 2and H 2O.Thus,the carbon utili-zation efficiency of OCM remains relatively low (12,13).Slow progress in discovering new cata-lysts to circumvent this problem has hindered further development,and no economically viable process has been put into practice so far.In a recent report,elemental sulfur was used as a softer oxidant than O 2(14):For a 5%CH 4/Ar mixture at 1323K,the best catalyst,PdS/ZrO 2,gave a CH 4conversion of ~16%and ethylene selectivity near 20%,albeit at the expense of the by-products CS 2and H 2S (14).In contrast,the bifunctional catalysts based on Mo/zeolites cata-lyze CH 4conversion to aromatics (benzene andnaphthalene)nonoxidatively,thereby avoiding CO 2formation (15–18).CH 4is activated on the metal sites forming CH x species,which dimerize to C 2H y .Subsequent oligomerization on the acidic sites located inside the zeolite pores yields ben-zene and naphthalene,as well as copious amounts of coke (19–21).Commercial prospects for this process are further hampered by the instability of zeolites at the very high reaction temperatures.To achieve direct conversion of CH 4efficient-ly,the challenges lie in cleaving the first C –H bond while suppressing further catalytic dehy-drogenation,avoiding both CO 2generation and coke deposition.We report that these conditions can be met using lattice-confined single iron sites embedded in a silica matrix.These sites activate CH 4in the absence of oxidants,generating methyl radicals,which desorb from the catalyst surface and then undergo a series of gas-phase reactions to yield ethylene,benzene,and naphthalene as the only products (with ethylene dominating at short space-times for a selectivity of ~52.7%at 1293K).A methane conversion as high as 48.1%is achieved at 1363K.The catalysts were obtained by fusing ferrous metasilicate with SiO 2at 1973K in air and from commercial quartz,followed by leaching with aqueous HNO 3and drying at 353K (22).The resulting catalyst was designated 0.5%Fe©SiO 2(©denotes confinement and here represents a cat-alyst characterized by the lattice-confined single iron sites embedded within a silica matrix).It con-tained 0.5weight percent (wt %)Fe and had a Brunauer –Emmett –Teller surface area of <1m 2/g.The catalyst was activated in a fixed-bed micro-reactor in the reaction atmosphere [90volume percent (vol %)CH 4/N 2]at 1173K.The efflu-ent was analyzed by online gas chromatography (GC).At 1223K,CH 4conversion was 8.1%(Fig.1A)and increased with temperature,exceeding 48.1%at 1363K (Fig.1B).Only ethylene,ben-zene,and naphthalene were produced;neither coke nor CO 2was detected,despite the relative-ly high reaction temperature.A single-pass yield of 48%hydrocarbons is achieved at 1363K and 21.4liters per gram of catalyst (gcat)per hour.Selectivities vary from 40.9to 52.1%for ethylene,21.0to 29.1for benzene,and 23.6to 38.2%for naphthalene,over the investigated temperature range (1223to 1363K).By comparison,a blank experiment (an empty reactor with no catalyst)under the same conditions showed a CH 4conversion of only 2.5%,and 95%of the product was coke (Fig.1A).A test with unmodified SiO 2as the catalyst yielded virtually1State Key Laboratory of Catalysis,Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Dalian 116023,Peo-ple ’s Republic of China.2State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics,Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Dalian 116023,People ’s Republic of China.3State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals,Institute of Coal Chemical Engineering,School of Chemical Engineering,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116012,People ’s Republic of China.4Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics,Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,People ’s Republic of China.5Nano-Pico Center,Key Laboratory of Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS)of Ministry of Education,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,People ’s Republic of China.6Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility,Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 201204,People ’s Republic of China.*Corresponding author.E-mail:xhbao@9MAY 2014VOL 344SCIENCE616REPORTSo n J u l y 12, 2016h t t p ://s c i e n c e .s c i e n c e m a g .o r g /D o w n l o a d e d f r o mthe same result (table S1)(22).Most notably,the use of 0.5wt %Fe/SiO 2as the catalyst (prepared with wet impregnation on amorphous SiO 2with a high surface area,348m 2/g)(22)also led to high coke formation (>98%).We have varied the iron loadings,support materials,and preparation methods,which unfortunately do not preclude coke on iron nanoparticles (NPs).For example,coke remained the principal product (>50%)over 0.5%Fe/ZSM.0.8%Fe/SiO 2prepared by sol-gel method and 0.2%Fe/SiC (22)enhanced selective formation of hydrocarbons to some extent,but still with a considerable amount of coke (Fig.1A).Figure S1(22)demonstrates that the reac-tivity of 0.5%Fe©SiO 2was very reproducible.All mass balances are above 99%.At 1363K,the space-time yields for ethylene,benzene,and naphthalene were 91,18,and 9mol kgcat –1hour –1,respectively.Moreover,the process represents a new and sustainable approach to H 2production because the by-products are high –value-added hydrocarbons (ethylene and aromatics)instead of coke and CO 2(23,24).The yield of H 2varies with the reaction conditions,and the concentra-tions in the effluent range from 10.9to 51.2%(fig.1D)(22).Furthermore,the 0.5%Fe©SiO 2catalyst was very stable,and no deactivation was observedduring a 60-hour test at 1293K (Fig.1C).Meth-ane conversion remained at ~32%throughout this long run.Selectivities to ethylene (52.7%),benzene (21.5%),and naphthalene (25.8%)were constant,and the total selectivity to these pro-ducts remained >99%.The combination of atom-economy,high selectivity,and high conversion is notable,considering the rather low loading of Fe (0.5wt %)and very low surface area (<1m 2/g)of the SiO 2.Although noncatalytic pyrolysis of CH 4has been extensively studied for light hydrocarbon synthesis,the product is dominated with acetylene accompanied by high coke formation (25–27).By comparison,the catalytically initiated reaction de-scribed here compares very favorably with other reported direct-conversion processes,including pyrolysis,OCM (13),and nonoxidative aromati-zation (21).Finally,because natural gas usually contains some ethane,we added 1and 5vol %ethane to the reactant stream.The presence of ethane substantially enhanced methane conver-sion (fig.S2)(22),and ethane is almost completely converted,although a small amount of coke is formed at 1173K and a space velocity of 4.84liter gcat –1h –1.The unprecedented efficiency of the catalyt-ically initiated CH 4conversion process is attri-buted to the high activity of the coordinativelyunsaturated iron sites toward the C-H bond of CH 4(28,29).The isolated nature of these sites,as evidenced by sub-angstrom –resolution high-angle annular-dark field (HAADF)scanning transmis-sion electron microscopy (STEM)and in situ x-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES),pre-cludes surface C-C coupling and,hence,coke formation.Transmission electron microscopy in-dicates that in the fresh 0.5%Fe©SiO 2catalyst,iron oxide NPs with a size of ~3to 4nm are distributed homogeneously throughout the SiO 2matrix (fig.S3)(22).A STEM-HAADF image of the catalyst after reaction reveals many bright dots of atomic size scattered across the SiO 2matrix,highlighted by the red circles in Fig.2A.Each dot represents an individual Fe atom,con-sidering the much lower contrast of Si and O in the HAADF image.This result suggests that the iron species are redistributed from the original oxide NPs to isolated atoms during catalyst activation.This hypothesis is validated by the in situ XANES during activation.The near-edge spec-trum of the catalyst is similar to that of Fe foil (Fig.2B).In Fig.2C,the Fourier-transformed k 3-weighted c (k )function (where k is wave number)(30)shows that,after activation,the Fe-O scattering paths apparent in the spectrum of the fresh catalyst (line 1)havedisappeared,Fig.1.Reaction performance.(A )Comparison of different catalysts at 1223K and 4.84liter gcat –1hour –1.(B )Effect of reaction temperatures and space velocities on the 0.5%Fe©SiO 2catalyst.Blue circles denote CH 4con-version,whereas bars represent product selectivities.(C )Long-term stabilitytest of 0.5%Fe©SiO 2at 1293K and 14.5liter gcat –1hour –1.(D )(Top)Hydrogen contents of the reactor effluent (open circles)and the calculated values (solid circles);(bottom)H 2peaks in GC analysis normalized by the internal standard N 2(22).a.u.,arbitrary units.SCIENCE VOL 3449MAY 2014617REPORTSo n J u l y 12, 2016h t t p ://s c i e n c e .s c i e n c e m a g .o r g /D o w n l o a d e d f r o mwhereas new scattering paths appear (line 2).They are assigned to Fe-C and Fe-Si paths,by comparison to the spectra of reference materials such as Fe 2O 3,FeSi 2,and iron carbides (31).In the presence of CH 4above 1173K,iron oxide species in the fresh 0.5%Fe©SiO 2interact ex-tensively with the support,becoming embed-ded in the silica matrix through bonding to Si and C atoms.Thus,these otherwise extremely reactive,coordinatively unsaturated iron atoms are stabilized and persist under the very harsh reaction conditions.No aggregation was observed,even after prolonged reaction for 60hours.In contrast,the 2-to 5-nm-sized iron NPs in 0.5%Fe/SiO 2(fig.S5a)(22)after activation un-der the same conditions exhibit only a Fe –Fe bond (line 3in Fig.2,B and C).This result explains the extensive carbon deposition observed for 0.5%Fe/SiO 2,considering that iron NPs are widely used for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes (32).That process involves catalytic cleavage of C –H bonds and dissolution of carbon species into the iron lattice.Subsequent C-C coupling on an iron NP surface and crystallization from the super-saturated carbide solid solution drive the growth of nanotubes (33).However,under the harsh re-action conditions in the current reaction,0.5%Fe/SiO 2deactivates very rapidly,and iron NPs aggregated and grew to 20to 30nm after reaction (fig.S4b)(22).These results again highlight the crucial role played by the site isolation of the iron species in 0.5%Fe©SiO 2in achieving high sel-ectivity toward hydrocarbons and preventing coke formation.Furthermore,density functional theory (DFT)calculations suggest that the most stable struc-ture in the reactive atmosphere is an iron atom coordinated by one Si and two C atoms and is thus embedded within the SiO 2matrix,as de-picted in Fig.3A and fig.S5.The calculated Fe –C and Fe –Si bond lengths are 1.6and 2.4Å,respec-tively,which are consistent with those estimated from extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)(table S2)(22).This lattice-confined single iron site initiates CH 4dehydrogenation by generating a •CH 3radical,which subsequently releases from the surface with an energy barrier of 2.32eV instead of undergoing further dehydro-genation or C-C coupling (fig.S5)(22).The Fe site is then exposed and becomes active for adsorp-tion of a second methane molecule and release of another methyl radical,with energy barriers of 3.07and 2.19eV ,respectively (Fig.3A).Migra-tion of H from C in Fe-C-Si sites to Fe involves a barrier of 0.58eV .The resulting surface H species desorbs as H 2with an energy barrier of 1.61eV .The intermediacy of methyl radicals was verified by online vacuum ultraviolet soft photoioni-zation molecular-beam mass spectrometry (VUV-SPI-MBMS)(fig.S6)(22).Molecules were ionized with a 10.6-eV VUV lamp,which has an energy lower than the CH 4ionization energy (12.6eV).This allows detection of intermediate radicals and products (34,35).Figure 3B and its inset display all species detected at 1193K.Methyl radicals,represented by the signal at mass/charge ratio (m /z )=15,are clearly observed.Additional sig-nals at m /z =28,40,42,78,92,and 128are assigned to ethylene (C 2H 4),propyne or propadiene (C 3H 4),propylene (C 3H 6),benzene (C 6H 6),toluene (C 7H 8),and naphthalene (C 10H 8),respectively.To further elucidate the mechanism,the reac-tion profile of methyl radicals at 1225K was sim-ulated with DFT (Fig.3C and fig.S7)(22).Two •CH 3radicals combine to form C 2H 6via a strongly exothermic process.C 2H 6undergoes dehydrogen-ation readily,giving C 2H 4and H atoms with an energy barrier of 1.58eV .By abstraction of H from C 2H 4,the resulting •C 2H 3radical tends to react with additional C 2H 4molecules.Further de-hydrogenation and cyclization leads to benzene,with an energy barrier of 2.85eV .C 6H 6is also readily dehydrogenated by •H and,after further chain growth and cyclization,yields the thermody-namically more stable naphthalene.The low bar-rier for transformation of C 2H 6to C 2H 4explains the absence of C 2H 6among the experimentally observed products under steady-state reaction con-ditions,whereas the thermodynamically more stable hydrocarbons C 2H 4,C 6H 6,and C 10H 8ac-cumulated and were detected.At equilibrium at 1225K and atmospheric pressure,the yields of C 2H 4,C 6H 6,and C 10H 8from CH 4were estimated to be 9.0,34.0,and 57.0%(22),respectively.The relative ratios of these products could be manipulated by changing the reaction conditions.For example,increasing the CH 4flow rate in the VUV-SPI-MBMS re-actor favors formation of C 2H 4(Fig.3D),whereas lower flow rates (corresponding to longer resi-dence times)promote cyclization of intermediates leading to aromatics,which are consistent with the GC analysis obtained in the microreactor.These results lend further support to the hypothesis that the reaction is initiated by the catalytic generation of methyl radicals,which subsequently undergo a series of gas-phase reactions.Thus,the conversion efficiency is high,despite the very limited number of surface iron sites and the extremely low surface area of the catalyst.Heterogeneous systems for CH 4activation gen-erally still suffer from poor carbon utilization,caused in part by low selectivity.Here,we dem-onstrate an atom-economical direct CH 4conver-sion process,enabled by the lattice-confined single iron sites embedded within a silica matrix,which activate CH 4and generate methyl radicals.A conversion as high as 48.1%was obtained at 1363K and a space velocity of 21.4liter gcat –1hour –1,with a selectivity to C 2H 4of >48.4%(the re-mainder being aromatics).No deactivation was observed even after reaction for 60hours,and the total carbon selectivity to the three products re-mained >99%.Although the dehydrogenation itself is endothermic,high selectivity to ethylene in this process substantially reduces the heat input (estimated to be about half that of a typical thermal pyrolysis process with dominating acet-ylene in product),as shown in table S3(22).These findings open up new possibilities for fundamental studies of direct,nonoxidative activation of CH 4.Fig.2.Structural features of 0.5%Fe©SiO 2.(A )STEM-HAADF image of the catalyst after reaction,with the inset showing the computational model of the single iron atom bonded to two C atoms and one Si atom within silica matrix.(B )In situ XANES upon activation and (C )Fourier transformed (FT)k 3-weighted c (k )-function of the EXAFS spectra.Solid lines denote reference samples of Fe foil,FeSi 2,and Fe 2O 3.Line 1denotes the fresh 0.5%Fe©SiO 2.Line 2stands for 0.5%Fe©SiO 2and line 3for 0.5%Fe/SiO 2upon activation in 10%CH 4/N 2at 1173K for 2hours,respectively.R(Å),distance in angstroms.9MAY 2014VOL 344SCIENCE618REPORTSo n J u l y 12, 2016h t t p ://s c i e n c e .s c i e n c e m a g .o r g /D o w n l o a d e d f r o mIt is anticipated that combining a catalyst such as this one with an efficient reactor technology may enable the development of non –syngas-based routes to transform light hydrocarbons into high –value-added chemicals.References and Notes/lab/ACC-US-chemical-investment-linked-to-shale-gas-reaches-$100-billion_58946.html.2.J.Li et al .,J.Am.Chem.Soc.134,836–839(2012).3.F.Diederich,Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.52,6–7(2013).4.H.M.T.Galvis et al .,J.Am.Chem.Soc.134,16207–16215(2012).5.H.M.Torres Galvis et al .,Science 335,835–838(2012).6.Note that the construction of two megascale methanol plants in the U.S.Pacific Northwest was recentlyannounced to supply olefin feedstocks to Dalian,/lab/Chinese-group-plans-two-mega-methanol-plants-in-USPacific-Northwest-to-supply-olefins-feedstock_58289.html.rkins,A.Z.Khan,Aust.J.Chem.42,1655–1670(1989).9.G.E.Keller,M.M.Bhasin,J.Catal.73,9–19(1982).10.H.Arakawa et al .,Chem.Rev.101,953–996(2001).11.J.H.Lunsford,Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.Engl.34,970–980(1995).12.S.Arndt et al .,Catal.Rev.Sci.Eng.53,424–514(2011).13.U.Zavyalova,M.Holena,R.Schlögl,M.Baerns,ChemCatChem 3,1935–1947(2011).14.Q.Zhu et al .,Nat.Chem.5,104–109(2013).15.L.S.Wang et al .,Catal.Lett.21,35–41(1993).16.B.M.Weckhuysen,D.J.Wang,M.P.Rosynek,J.H.Lunsford,J.Catal.175,338–346(1998).17.R.W.Borry,Y.H.Kim,A.Huffsmith,J.A.Reimer,E.Iglesia,J.Phys.Chem.B 103,5787–5796(1999).18.D.J.Wang,J.H.Lunsford,M.P.Rosynek,J.Catal.169,347–358(1997).19.D.Ma et al .,J.Catal.208,260–269(2002).20.R.Ohnishi,S.T.Liu,Q.Dong,L.Wang,M.Ichikawa,J.Catal.182,92–103(1999).21.S.Ma,X.Guo,L.Zhao,S.Scott,X.Bao,J.Energy Chem.22,1–20(2013).22.Supplementary materials are available on Science Online.23.T.V.Choudhary,C.Sivadinarayana,C.C.Chusuei,A.Klinghoffer,D.W.Goodman,J.Catal.199,9–18(2001).24.M.A.Ermakova,D.Y.Ermakov,A.L.Chuvilin,G.G.Kuvshinov,J.Catal.201,183–197(2001).25.A.Beloqui Redondo,E.Troussard,J.A.van Bokhoven,Fuel Process.Technol.104,265–270(2012).26.A.Holmen,O.Olsvik,O.A.Rokstad,Fuel Process.Technol.42,249–267(1995).27.G.P.Van Der Zwet,P.A.J.M.Hendriks,R.A.Van Santen,Catal.Today 4,365–369(1989).28.H.Schwarz,Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.50,10096–10115(2011).29.E.W.McFarland,H.Metiu,Chem.Rev.113,4391–4427(2013).30.B.Qiao et al .,Nat.Chem.3,634–641(2011).31.E.de Smit,A.M.Beale,S.Nikitenko,B.M.Weckhuysen,J.Catal.262,244–256(2009).32.R.C.Che,L.M.Peng,X.F.Duan,Q.Chen,X.L.Liang,Adv.Mater.16,401–405(2004).33.X.Pan et al .,Nat.Mater.6,507–511(2007).34.Z.Zhou,H.Guo,F.Qi,Trends Analyt.Chem.30,1400–1409(2011).35.L.Luo et al .,Sci.Rep.3,1625(2013).Acknowledgments:This work was financially supported by the “Strategic Priority Research Program ”of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant XDA09030101),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 21321002,11079005,21033009,and 21103181),and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grants 2011CBA00503and 2013CB933100).We thank S.L.Scott and H.Metiu for fruitful discussion.An international patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty is pending (PCT/CN2013/079977).Supplementary Materials/content/344/6184/616/suppl/DC1Materials and Methods Figs.S1to S7Tables S1to S3References (36–66)10March 2014;accepted 15April 201410.1126/science.1253150Fig.3.Investigation of the reaction mechanism over 0.5%Fe©SiO 2.(A )DFT calculations on catalytic generation of methyl radicals at 1223K.(B )Species in the reactor effluent at 1193K,detected by VUV-SPI-MBMS.amu,atomic mass units.(C )DFT simulated reaction profile of methyl radicals in the gas phase at 1225K.D G,Gibbs free energy.(D )Relative intensity of VUV-SPI-MBMS signals of major products as a function of CH 4flow rate at 1223K. SCIENCE VOL 3449MAY 2014619REPORTSo n J u l y 12, 2016h t t p ://s c i e n c e .s c i e n c e m a g .o r g /D o w n l o a d e d f r o m(6184), 616-619. [doi: 10.1126/science.1253150]344Science Pan and Xinhe Bao (May 8, 2014)Tan, Rui Si, Shuo Zhang, Jianqi Li, Litao Sun, Zichao Tang, Xiulian Liang Yu, Chao Ma, Xing Wu, Dehui Deng, Mingming Wei, Dali Xiaoguang Guo, Guangzong Fang, Gang Li, Hao Ma, Hongjun Fan,Aromatics, and HydrogenDirect, Nonoxidative Conversion of Methane to Ethylene,Editor's Summaryavoided surface reactions between the radicals that would deposit solid carbon.in the gas phase to form ethylene and aromatics along with hydrogen. The isolation of the active sites exposes methane to isolated iron sites on a silica catalyst. Methyl radicals were generated and coupled (p. 616) report a high-temperature nonoxidative route that et al.Guo tend to overoxidize the products. provide chemical feedstocks. However, the reaction conditions needed to activate the strong C-H bond Direct routes to converting methane to higher hydrocarbons can allow natural gas to be used to Upgrading Methane Sans OxygenThis copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.Article Tools/content/344/6184/616article tools:Visit the online version of this article to access the personalization and Permissions/about/permissions.dtlObtain information about reproducing this article: is a registered trademark of AAAS.Science Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2016 by the American Association for thein December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week Science o n J u l y 12, 2016h t t p ://s c i e n c e .s c i e n c e m a g .o r g /D o w n l o a d e d f r o m。

相关文档
最新文档