globalization

First of all, it has been asserted that globalization provides the increasing of productivity and life standard of societies. To begin with productivity is indeed increased as it can be seen that the population of the world is rising rapidly even uncontrollable and more people means that there is a need of more product too. Thus Globalization responds the needs of 7 billion people. Moreover the standards of life is a lot better than 50 years ago as they are more machines and systems invented in developed countries supporting all world. However there is another side of the facts. Globalization causes the poor citizens having more requirements. Secondly cultural intermingling is enlarging with globalization which lets the people from all over the world able to communicate easier. On the other hand sharing traditional behaviors cause them fading as boundaries are disappearing.
The most important disadvantage of globalization is the increasing number of the loafer. After the industrial revolution, industry gravitated some particular countries. Because of that, these countries became a power in industry. However production decreased and so unemployment was raised in the other countries. Another reason of the unemployment rise is that the need of less manpower. As stated at Wikipedia, many workers found themselves suddenly unemployed, as could no longer compete with machines which only required relatively limited work to produce more product than a single worker.
Another major damage of globalization is that some cultures are getting lost. The cultures of the countries that have more economic power are more dominant than others. Because, wealthy countries produce many things that can affect cultures, for example, clothes, movies and technologic products. According to Ikerd, while the global community is increasing, more and more people have became ignorant about social, ethical and moral values which are various in defining groups. (2002) Therefore, globalization damages small cultures which are in risk of being extinct. Big disadvantages.
The final significant effect of globalization is the difficulty of competition. With globalization, trade between the countries has been started to remove limits. This situation of enterprises has prepared the ground to be in constant competition with not only national competitors but also international competitors. Therefore, business requires being in a more rigorous and challenging competitive atmosphere to maintain continuity and development. Rising of monopole companies and trough among production costs are the main effects of this hard competition in business. As pointed in Global Policy Forum, undeveloped countries choose to use foreign capital for their improvement however it disposes the equality and stability instead.
In conclusion, unemployment, social degeneration and difficulty of competition are the killer disadvantages on people life that based on globalization. In my opinion, people must be aware of this exploitation. Globalization is a one-way tale.
首先，它一直宣称，全球化提供了增加生产力和社会生活的标准。

要开始与生产力的确是，因为它可以看出，世界人口增长迅速，甚至无法控制和更多的人增加，意味着有需要更多的产品。

因此，全球化响应7亿人的需要。

此外，生活标准是很多比50年前，因为它们是在发达国家支持世界所有发明更多的机器和系统更好。

然而，事实的另一面。

全球化导致的贫困公民有更多的要求。

其次，文化的交织是扩大它可以让
来自世界各地能够沟通更容易的人民的全球化。

另一方面，共享的传统行为导致他们衰落的界限正在消失。

全球化的最重要的缺点是越来越多的流浪。

工业革命后，行业所吸引某些特定的国家。

正因为如此，这些国家成为一个行业的力量。

但产量下降，所以失业率在其他国家提出。

失业率上升的另一个原因是，需要较少的人力。

在维基百科说，许多工人突然发现自己失业，可以不再只需要相对有限的工作，生产更多的产品比单个工人与机器竞争。

全球化的另一个重大损害，有些文化是迷路。

有更多的经济力量的国家的文化是比其他人更占主导地位。

因为，富裕国家产生很多事情可以影响文化，例如衣服，电影和technologic产品。

据Ikerd，而全球社会越来越多，越来越多的人已经成为社会，伦理和道德价值观，这是在定义组的各种无知。

（2002），因此，全球化损害小的文化被灭绝的危险。

大的缺点。

最后全球化的显著作用是竞争的难度。

随着全球化，国家之间的贸易已经开始删除限制。

这种情况的企业已准备在地面，在不断的竞争不仅是国家的竞争对手，但也是国际竞争对手。

因此，企业需要更严格的和具有挑战性的的竞争氛围，以保持连续性和发展。

单极公司和波谷之间的生产成本上升，这在企业的硬竞争的主要影响。

在全球政策论坛中指出，不发达的国家选择使用外资的改善，但是它配置的平等和稳定，而不是。

总之，失业，社会退化和竞争的难度是基于全球化对人们生活的杀手，缺点。

在我看来，人们必须意识到这种剥削。

全球化是一个单向的故事。

Globalization is a new term that has found a significant place in the lives of the people. By globalization, we mean shedding down the walls of distrust and the barriers of suspicion in between countries, to make a bridge where ideas and beliefs can cross the borders. Though globalization today primarily covers the economical side, the impact is not limited to the economy only. It actually affects every aspect of life, like cultural, social, psychological and of course, political. While globalization is seen as a sign of a hopeful future by some, there are others who believe that it can cause tremendous disaster for the world economy. Read on to find the pros and cons of globalization.
Pros Of Globalization
With globalization, there is a global market for companies to trade their products and a wider range of options for people, to choose from among the products of different nations.
Developing countries benefit a lot from globalization, as there is a sound flow of money and thus, a decrease in the currency difference.
To meet the increasing demands that follow globalization, there is an increase in the production sector. This gives loads of options to the manufacturers as well.
Competition keeps prices relatively low, and as a result, inflation is less likely to occur.
The focus is diverted and segregated among all the nations. No country remains the single power head; instead there are compartmentalized power sectors. The decisions at higher levels are meant for the people at large.
Communication among the countries is on the rise, which allows for better understanding and broader vision.
As communication increases amongst two countries, there is interchange of cultures as well. We get to know more about the other's cultural preferences.
As we feed to each other's financial needs, the ecological imbalance is also meted out. Governments of countries show concern about each other.
Cons Of Globalization
Globalization is causing Europeans to lose their jobs as work is being outsourced to the Asian countries. The cost of labor in the Asian countries is low as compared to other countries.
The high rate of profit for the companies, in Asia, has resulted in a pressure on the employed Europeans, who are always under the threat of the business being outsourced.
Companies are as opening their counterparts in other countries. This results in transferring the quality of their product to other countries, thereby increasing the chances of depreciation in terms of quality. There are experts who believe that globalization is the cause for the invasion of communicable diseases and social degeneration in countries.
The threat that the corporates would rule the world is on high, as there is a lot of money invested by them.
It is often argued that poor countries are exploited by the richer countries where the work force is taken advantage of and low wages are implemented.
全球化是一个新名词，已经找到了人民生活的显著位置。

全球化，我们的意思是脱落下来的不信任的墙壁和国家之间的猜疑的壁垒，使思想和信念可以跨边界的桥梁。

虽然全球化的今天，主要涵盖了经济的一面，影响并不只限于经济。

实际上，它影响到生活的各个方面，如文化，社会，心理，当然，政治。

虽然全球化是看到了一个充满希望的未来的一些的迹象，也有其他人认为，这可能会导致世界经济发生了巨大的灾难。

阅读，了解全球化的利弊，利弊。

赞成全球化
随着全球化，贸易的产品为公司的全球市场和一个人的选择范围更广，来自不同国家的产品之间选择。

发展中国家从全球化中受益很多，因为钱的声音流，因此，在货币差减少。

为了满足日益增加的需求，遵循全球化，有一个生产部门的增加。

这使制造商以及负载选项。

竞争使价格相对较低，因此，通货膨胀是不太可能发生。

重点是转移和所有国家之间的隔离。

没有任何一个国家仍是唯一的动力头，而是有隔离的权力部门。

上级决定，目的是为广大人民。

国家之间的沟通是在上升，这对于更好地理解和更广阔的视野让。

由于两国之间沟通增加，以及文化的交汇处。

我们去了解对方的文化偏好。

正如我们给对方的金融需求，生态失衡也是罪刑。

各国政府关注对方。

全球化的缺点
全球化是导致欧洲人失去工作作为工作正在外包给亚洲国家。

与其他国家相比，亚洲国家的劳动力成本低。

公司的盈利率很高，在亚洲，导致在就业的欧洲人，谁是下业务外包的威胁始终压力。

公司是开放在其他国家的同行。

这将导致在自己的产品质量转移到其他国家，从而增加在质量方面的折旧机会。

有专家，他们认为，全球化是造成传染病的入侵和国家的社会变性。

高，就是企业将统治世界的威胁，因为是他们投资很多钱。

人们常常认为，贫困国家利用丰富的工作队伍优势和实行低工资的国家。

Negative effects and solutions
The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) has proposed an agenda to support conditions for developing countries to improve their standing in the global economy.[16] Economists have theories on how to combat the disadvantages faced by developing countries. However, the advantaged countries continue to control the economic agenda. In order to rectify the social injustice dilemma, international economic institutions (such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund) must give voice to developing countries.[17] A solution is to issue global rules that protect developing countries. It is still difficult for leaders of developing nations to influence these global
rules.[18]
In order to create better economic relations globally, international lending agencies must work with developing countries to change how and where credit is concentrated as well as work towards accelerating financial development in developing countries.[19] There is a need for social respect for all persons worldwide. The Economic Commission of Latin America and the Caribbean suggests that in order to ensure such social respect, the United Nations should expand its agenda to work more rigorously with international lending agencies. Despite their title, international lending agencies tend to be nation-based. The ECLAC suggests that international lending agencies should expand to be more inclusive of all nations and they propose that there is a need for universal competitiveness. Key factors in achieving universal competition is the spread of knowledge at the State level through education, training and technological advancements.[20] Economist, Jagdish Bhagwati, also suggests that programs to help developing countries adjust to the global economy would be beneficial for international economic relations.[21]
Several movements, such as the Fair Trade movement and the Anti-sweatshop movement, have worked towards promoting a more socially just global economy. The Fair Trade movement has played a significant role in alleviating exploitation due to economic globalization. For example, Fair Trade sales account for 1.6 billion US dollars each year.[22] The Fair Trade movement works towards improving trade, development and production for disadvantages producers. Furthermore, the movement works to raise consumer awareness of exploitation of developing countries. Fair Trade works under the motto of “trade, not aid”, to improve the quality of life for farmers and merchants by participating in direct sales, providing better prices and supporting the community.[23]
[edit] Effects on world cultures
Economic globalization may have various strong impacts on different world cultures. Populations may mimic the international flow of capital and labor markets in the form of immigration and the merger of cultures. Foreign resources and economic measures may impact different native cultures and may cause assimilation of a native people.[24] Researchers are now studying the effects of economic globalization on the youth in various world populations such as Arab, South American, South East-Asian, Caribbean, and African populations. As these populations are exposed to the English language, Computers, western music, and North American culture, changes are being noted in shrinking family size, immigration to larger cities, more casual dating practices, and gender roles are transformed.
Yu Xintian wrote in a cultural impact study that there were two contrary trends in culture due to economic globalization.[25] Xintian argues that culture and industry not only flows from the west while effecting people, but he says there is also a cultural nationalization or an effect of localization that wishes to promote and protect individual cultures. He also points out that economic globalization began after WWII, where as internationalization began over a century ago and is something completely different.[26]
George Ritzer wrote about the McDonaldization of society and how fast food businesses spread throughout the United States and the rest of the world, forcing world populations to adopt fast food culture.[27] In this book, Ritzer also writes about how other businesses have copied the McDonalds Corportation's business model for expansion and influence. In 2006, 233 of 280 or well over half of the new McDonalds opended were overseas. In 2007, Japan had 2,828 McDonalds locations and serves as just one example of the globalized effect of international corportaions. The Body Shop, a British ecologically conscious cosmetic company, represents the process of McDonaldization working in all directions.[28] Various countries export their own versions of McDonaldization but have the same influences in standardizing world culture.
Global media news companies export information through news, radio, and internet. This creates a mostly one-way flow of information, and exposure of mostly western products and values. Companies like CNN, Reuters, and the BBC dominate the global airwaves while having a particular western point of view. Other media news companies such as Al Jazeera may offer a different point of view, but have a far smaller audience and thus effect fewer people in influence.[29]
的负面影响和解决方案
拉丁美洲和加勒比（拉加经委会）经济委员会提出了一项议程，以支持发展中国家的条件，以提高他们在全球经济中的地位。

[16]经济学家们就如何打击发展中国家所面临的劣势的理论。

然而，得天独厚的国家
继续控制经济议程。

为了纠正社会不公的窘境，国际经济机构（如世界银行和国际货币基金组织）必须给予发展中国家的声音。

[17]，一个解决方案是问题的全球规则，维护发展中国家。

[18]仍难以发展中国家领导人的影响，这些全球性规则。

为了创造更好的经济关系，全球国际贷款机构必须与发展中国家的改变如何和信贷集中，以及对加速发展中国家经济发展的工作[19]所有的人都需要有一个社会的尊重。

世界各地。

拉丁美洲和加勒比经济委员会建议，为了确保这种社会的尊重，联合国应扩大其议程与国际贷款机构的工作更加严格。

尽管他们的冠军称号，国际贷款机构往往是国家为基础的。

拉加经委会认为，国际贷款机构应扩大到所有国家更具包容性和他们提出，需要有一个普遍的竞争力。

在实现普遍竞争的关键因素是通过教育，培训和技术进步的国家一级的知识传播。

[20]经济学家贾格迪什巴格沃蒂，也表明方案，以帮助发展中国家适应全球经济将有利于国际经济关系。

[21]
几个动作，如公平贸易运动和反血汗工厂运动，努力促进社会更公正的全球经济。

公平贸易运动，起到了显著减轻由于经济全球化的剥削作用。

例如，公平贸易销售占每年为1.6亿美元。

[22]公平贸易运动的作品，努力改善贸易，发展和缺点生产者的生产。

此外，运动工程，以提高利用发展中国家的消费意识。

公平贸易“贸易，不要援助”的口号下，参与直接销售，提供更好的价格和社会支持，以改善农民和商人的生活质量。

[23]
[编辑]对世界文化的影响
经济全球化可能有各种完全不同的世界文化的强烈冲击。

人口可能会模仿在移民和文化的合并形式的资本和劳动力市场的国际流动。

国外资源和经济措施，可能会影响不同的本土文化，并可能导致一个当地人同化。

[24]的研究人员目前正在研究的青年在不同的世界人口，如阿拉伯，南美，南亚东亚经济全球化的影响，加勒比和非洲的人口。

由于这些人群接触英语，计算机，西方音乐和北美文化，变化正在缩小家庭规模指出，移民到大城市，更多的休闲约会的做法，和性别角色转换。

俞新天文化影响的研究中写道，有两种相反的文化由于经济全球化的趋势。

[25]新天认为，不仅从西方文化和产业流动，而有效的人，但他说，也是一种文化的国有化或本地化的效果，希望促进和保护个人的文化。

[26]他还指出，经济全球化始于二战之后，作为国际化的开始一个多世纪前，是完全不同的东西。

瑞泽尔乔治写了关于社会的麦当劳食品企业如何快速传遍了整个美国和世界其他地区，迫使世界人口采取快餐文化[27]在这本书中，瑞泽尔也对其他企业如何复制写入麦当劳Corportation的扩张和影响力的商业模式。

2006年，233，280或超过一半的新的麦当劳opended海外。

2007年，日本有2828麦当劳的位置，并作为国际corportaions全球化的影响只是一个例子。

The Body Shop的生态意识的化妆品公司，英国，麦当劳化的过程中，在各个方向上工作的。

[28]各国出口麦当劳自己的版本，但在规范世界的文化相同的影响。

全球媒体的新闻公司的出口，通过新闻，广播和互联网的信息。

这将创建的信息大多是单向流动，而且大多是西方的产品和价值观念的暴露。

CNN，路透社和英国广播公司（BBC）等公司主宰全球的电波，而具有特定西方的观点。

其他媒体如半岛电视台新闻公司可能提供了不同的观点，但有一个小的受众影响力，从而影响人少了。

[29]。