托福写作评分标准详细解读

托福写作评分标准详细解读
家都知道，托福写作包含两个部分，满分为30分，但是托福写作是如何评分的呢?今天给大家带来了托福写作评分标准详细解读,希望能够帮助到大家，一起来学习吧。

托福写作评分标准详细解读
一.托福写作分为综合写作和独立写作
托福写作包括两部分，需在50分钟的时间内完成。

第一部分是综合写作，以阅读和听力材料为基础的写作试题，写作时间为20分钟。

考生首先需要阅读一篇学术篇章，阅读的时间是3分钟。

然后*隐去，考生需要听一段大约为2分钟左右的与阅读主题相关的演讲。

之后考生需要针对阅读和演讲中的观点作文，总结并说明演讲的内容与阅读中观点的关系，在20分钟的时间内完成一篇150~225字的*。

第二部分是独立写作，需要考生根据自己的知识和经验陈述、解释并支持对待某一问题的某个看法，考查综合语言技能的作文题目的评分以回答的质量、完整性和准确性为依据。

在30分钟内完成一篇300字以上的*。

点击查看详情
二.托福写作评分过程
托福写作评分包括机器评分以及人工评分两部分。

机器评分主要通过E-rater，对考生*的语法是否正确、用词是否得当、以及单词拼写及大小写是否准确等方面进行评分;一篇考生的*会经过两台机器评分。

人工评分通过ETS阅卷人评分，综合写作和独立写作分别有两位阅卷人给出分数。

托福写作原始分数为0-5分，考生得分分为三个level(如下图所示)：GOOD(4.0-5.0)，FAIR(2.5-3.5)，LIMITED(1.0-2.0)，最终成绩通过两个科目的分数取平均分，再换算为30分制的分数。

点击查看详情
托福写作怎么从5分换算成30分(托福写作分数换算方法)
三.托福写作分数换算标准
具体的换算标准如下：
5分换算为30分，
4.75换算为29分，
4.5分换算为28分，
4.25分换算为27分，
4分换算为25分，
3.75分换算为24分，
3.50换算为22分，
3.25分换算为21分，
3分换算为20分，
2.75分换算为18分，
2.50分换算为17分，
2.25分换算为15分，
2分换算为14分，
1.75分换算为12分，
1.5分换算为11分，
1.25分换算为10分，
1分换算为8分。

四.托福写作评分标准
托福写作5分作文：*切题，阐说充分，*有说服力;段落组织有序，衔接紧密，过渡自然，有很强的逻辑性;段落内句与句连接顺畅，句式使用恰当，灵活，娴熟;用词确切，得体。

*中有个别语法拼写错误，但不影响内容表达。

托福写作4分作文：*切题，阐说基本充分，在某些细节上有缺陷。

段落层次组织有序，衔接紧密，过渡自然，逻辑性强;句间连接顺畅，句式使用恰当，灵活;用词基本得体。

*中有少量用词不当和语法拼写错误。

托福写作3分作文：*切题，阐说尚可，展开不够。

段落层次组织有序，衔接紧密，过渡自然，有逻辑性;句间连接基本顺畅;有部分句法错误;用词一般，有时不得体。

词性区分和拼写等有若干错误。

托福写作2分作文：*切题，段落组织基本合理，有逻辑性，但只存在于语义层次上，语言表达上未能体现;句子框架结构基本成立，但有许多语法错误，句间联系不顺畅，往往是不善于使用逻辑连词，显得幼稚，生硬。

词汇方面拼写错误多，常有用词不得体现象。

托福写作1分作文：*切题。

阐说没有展开，只限于三言两语地回答问题;没有段落组织，很乱，长度很短，只有一段;句子排列有一定的逻辑关系，能看出各句基本框架，但结构或语法错误较多;用词不得体，拼写错误多。

托福写作0分作文：*各方面都有严重错误，句子不像句子。

总体印象是根本没有写作能力，英语水平太低，达不到一分标准，只能打最低分。

托福考试作文独立写作范文：小学生应多学科技吗
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: primary schools should spend more time on teaching young students (5-11years old) technology (like computer) than teaching music and art.
托福写作范文参考:
The question of “ what is the most important subject or skill the elementary schools should teach? ” has never failed to attract attention from educators, school administrators and even politicians especially when it comes to subjects like technology, or music and art. Some argue that school should spend more time teaching technology than music and art. Personally, I am not in favor of this position based on the following reasons.
Admittedly, with the advent of internet and state-of-art gadgets like laptop, tablets, being able to use computers skillfully is being considered as a valuable quality. However, early exposure to computers and other kinds of technological products might bring lots of risks and problems to kids’ future development. Recently research by National Society of Psychiatrists shows that exposure to computers at an early age leads to addiction to computers when they grow older and obviously spending too much time in front of
the computer can pose a threat to kids’ health, to be more specific, it leads to neck problems, nearsightedness, backache and even childhood obesity. Moreover, instead of getting addicted to playing on-line games and watching meaningless videos, kids should have spent more time focusing on their academic study, or even learning how to appreciate artwork or music. Indeed, spending more time learning art and music not only benefits the kids, but also it is conducive the community as whole.
First off, learning art and music at an early age helps to develop creativity and make the kids more imaginative. Actually, lots of scientific research in the psychological field shows that early exposure to art and music not only boosts academic achievement but also promotes creativity, self-confidence and school pride; kids who spend more time in learning art and music end up having higher analytical thinking and reasoning skills than kids who don’t.
Additionally, spending more time teaching kids music and art can can benefit the whole community. Music and art are a very important part of people’s lives. They are necessary for people to express their emotions, like happiness, sorrow, and even anger regardless of cultural background, ethnicity, age and even gentle. It is very urgent to spend more time teaching kids knowledge about。