英语考试制度应不应该改革英语辩论(中英对照版)

英语改革辩论稿

正方：应该改革

一辩:大多数人现在学英语不是为了实用，而是为了考试，它们学完英语后仍无法流利的同外国人对话，而且在英语这门科目上所花费的时间并不比其他科目少，有时甚至比其他科目还多，这大大压缩了其他科目的学习时间，而且语言类学习若不注重实用性，很容易让学生感到枯燥，削弱学生的动力。所以我方认为应该改革。

First Debater: Most people now learn English not for practical, but for the exam, they are still unable After studying English fluently with foreigners dialogue, but this time in English subjects spent no less than in other subjects, sometimes even more than in other subjects, which greatly reduced the time to learn other subjects, and language classes to learn if focus on practicality, it is easy for students to feel boring, undermine students' motivation. So we think we should reform.

二辩：1.改革是无时无刻不在进行的，不能因为前人的一些努力而一劳永逸。

2.成功不成功，不知道对方是怎么定义的。那么改革可以让现有的英语考试制度更加成功。

3.英语高考现在必然不会贸然取消，但是一定会对整个英语考试制度进行改革，包括英语高考。

Second debater:

1.a reform is not carried out all the time, not because of some previous efforts once and for all.

2. successful or not, I do not know how the other is defined. So reform can make the existing system more successful English exam.

3. English entrance is now certainly will not rush to cancel, but must be carried out throughout the English examination system reform, including the English exam.

三辩：1.请问对方为什么这么肯定说取消了英语高考会导致国人的英语水平显著下降，有进行过什么实质性的调研吗？

2.随着中国的各个方面正在与国际接轨，务必会有越来越多的人接触到英语，使用英语，无论是对话还是阅读。对方在这样的世界发展背景下还认为没有那么多中国人会去使用英语吗？

Third debater:

1. Why do you say for sure that I ask the other party to cancel the English entrance will lead to a significant decline in the standard of English people, there is no substantive research conducted it?

2. With the various aspects of China's working with international standards, be sure there will be more and more people come into contact with English, English, either dialogue or read. Each other in such a world development background also

believe not so many Chinese people to use English?

四辩：法国高等教育分为两个层次，精英教育和大众教育，分别对应工程师学院和大学，工程师学院毕业要求托业或者托福成绩过线，大学大多对英语没任何硬性要求。这就造成结果是有些群体英语说的非常好，但普通人或者即使在一般的政府办事机构普遍不会英语。这其中有法国的文化自豪因素，更重要是他们知道法国人不是离了英语就过不下去。但这也丝毫没有影响法国的创新能力。回到中国，答案就非常明显了。所以我方认为，作为一个英语非母语的大国，应该改革把英语作为高等教育选拔考试的必考科目的这种英语考试制度。英语教育应差别化，愿者多学，能者多学，需要者多学。

Forth Debater: French higher education is divided into two levels, elite education and public education, corresponding to engineering schools and universities, engineering schools graduation requirements TOEIC or TOEFL scores over the line, most of the university did not have any mandatory requirement for English. This result is caused by some groups speak English very well, but ordinary or general government offices generally do not speak English even in. Of which there are cultural factors that French pride, and more importantly, they know that the French are not from the English would not go on. But that did not affect the ability to innovate France. Back to China, the answer is very obvious. So we believe that, as a country with a non-native speakers of English, should reform the higher education entrance exams in English as compulsory subjects of this English test system. English education should be differentiated, those who are willing to learn, those who can learn, who need to learn more.

反方：不应改革

一辩:现在的英语考试制度是历代教育家们一次次通过汲取失败中的教训才有了现在的样子。到目前为止，现在的英语考试制度可以说很大程度上是成功的。高考本身是国人非常重视的一个考试，很多人会花很多精力去学习，取消英语高考会显著地下降国人的英语水平。所以我方认为不应改革。

First debater: the current examination system is the ancient English educator who time and again by the failure to learn the lessons only now look. So far, the current English examination system can be said to be largely successful. College entrance exam itself is a very important country, many people will spend a lot of effort to learn, to cancel the English entrance will significantly decrease people's English proficiency. So we think we should reform.

二辩：1.请问对方怎么定义实用的。我只知道现在有一定英语水平的人可以阅读一定量的英文文献和英文相关文章。

2.绝大多数中国人并不需要同外国人对话，事实上，也没有那么多的外国人可供用来同中国人对话。