系统性红斑狼疮

合集下载

系统性红斑狼疮百科

系统性红斑狼疮百科

系统性红斑狼疮 (systemic lupus erythematosus;SLE ):侵犯皮肤和多脏器的一种全身性自身免疫病。

某些不明病因诱导机体产生多种自身抗体(如抗核抗体等),导致:①自身抗体与相应自身抗原结合为循环免疫复合物,通过III型超敏反应而损伤自身组织和器官;②抗血细胞自身抗体与血细胞表面抗原结合,通过II型超敏反应而损伤血细胞。

北京军区总医院风湿免疫科专家说:系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)是一种弥漫性、全身性自身免疫病,主要累及皮肤粘膜、骨骼肌肉、肾脏及中枢神经系统,同时还可以累及肺、心脏、血液等多个器官和系统,表现出多种临床表现;血清中可检测到多种自身抗体和免疫学异常。

系统性红斑狼疮简介SLE好发于青年女性,发病高峰为15~40岁,男女发病比例为1:9左右。

幼年和老年性SLE的男女之比约为1:2。

全球的患病率约为30~50/10万人,我国的患病率约为70/10万人。

但各地的患病率报道有明显差异。

SLE的发病有一定的家族聚集倾向,SLE患者的同卵双生兄妹发病率为25%~50%,而异卵双生子间发病率仅为5%。

尽管SLE的发病受遗传因素的影响,但大多数为散发病例。

北京军区总医院风湿免疫科专家介绍系统性红斑狼疮分类按照主要的受累器官或组织的不同,系统性红斑狼疮可进一步分类为狼疮肾炎、神经精神性狼疮、狼疮肺炎、狼疮心肌炎以及狼疮肝炎等。

(1)皮肤病变:盘状红斑(DLE),是SLE的慢性皮肤损害,约有2~10%的DLE可发展为系统性红斑狼疮。

亚急性皮肤性狼疮(SCLE)可见于7%~27%的患者,多为对称性,常见于阳光暴露的部位,红斑可为鳞屑样丘疹或多形性环状红斑,多形性环状红斑可融合成大片状伴中心低色素区,愈合后不留有瘢痕。

急性皮肤病变的典型表现是蝶形红斑,约见于30%~60%的SLE患者,常是系统性红斑狼疮的起始表现,光照可使红斑加重或诱发红斑。

系统性红斑狼疮(修订)

系统性红斑狼疮(修订)

口腔溃疡:口腔或鼻咽部出现疼痛性 溃疡
关节炎:多个关节疼痛或肿胀,常为 对称性
浆膜炎:胸膜炎或心包炎
临床表现
1 肾脏损害:蛋白尿、血尿或管型尿 2 神经系统异常:癫痫发作或精神症状
3 血液系统异常:贫血、白细胞减少或血小板减少
4 免疫学异常:抗核抗体阳性、抗dsDNA抗体阳性等
5 心肺损害:肺间质病变、心包炎或心肌炎等
预防方面,避免环境因素 (如紫外线、化学物质)的 暴露可以降低SLE的发病风 险
12
+
34
一般来说,早期诊断和积 极治疗有助于改善预后
此外,定期体检和关注自 身健康状况也有助于早期
发现并治疗SLE
PART 5
患者教育
患者教育
对于SLE患者来说,了解自己的疾病、积极配合治疗和保持健康的生活方式非常重要。以 下是一些建议
了解自己的疾病:通过阅读相关资料、参加患者交流会等方式,了解SLE的病因、临床 表现、诊断和治疗等方面的知识 积极配合治疗:遵循医生的建议,按时服药、定期复查,同时注意观察病情变化并及 时与医生沟通 保持健康的生活方式:保持规律的作息时间、良好的饮食习惯和适当的锻炼,避免过 度劳累和精神压力
注意个人卫生:保持皮肤清洁、避免使用刺激性的化妆品和护肤品,以减轻皮肤损害
病因和发病机制
环境因素
紫外线、某些化学物 质(如染发剂、杀虫 剂)和药物(如普鲁卡 因胺)等环境因素可 能增加SLE的发病风 险。然而,这些因素 具体如何影响SLE的 发病过程尚不明确
病因和发病机制
免疫调节异常
SLE患者体内存在多种自身抗体 ,这些抗体会攻击自身组织和器 官,导致全身多系统损害。免疫 调节异常可能是这些自身抗体产 生的原因之一。在SLE患者的免 疫系统中,T淋巴细胞和B淋巴细 胞的功能异常可能起到关键作用

系统性红斑狼疮

系统性红斑狼疮

系统性红斑狼疮旳诊疗
• 美国SLE诊疗原则(美国风湿病学会1982年修订)
• 颊部红斑 • 盘状红斑 • 光过敏 • 口腔溃疡 • 关节炎 • 浆膜炎 • 肾脏病变 • 神经系统异常 1)癫痫 2)精神病 • 血液学异常 • 1)溶血性贫血伴网织红细胞增多;2)白细胞降低,<4 000/mm3;3)淋巴细
Erythematous raised patches with adherent keratotic scaling and follicular plugging: atrophic scarring may occur in older lesions
Photosensitivity
Skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight, by patient history or physician observation
心血管
以心包炎最多见。严重者可有心肌炎、心 力衰竭。周围血管病变如血栓性静脉炎 亦多见。

胸膜炎约35%,多为中档量胸腔积液,双侧 多见。间质性肺炎最多见。严重者可出 现出神经系统最多见。 精神障碍及行为异常,可出现幻觉、猜疑、妄想等。 癫痫发作。 其他如偏瘫、脊髓炎、颅神经及周围神经病变等。
Oral ulcers
Oral or nasopharyngeal ulceration, usually painless, observed by a physician
Nonerosive arthritis
Involving 2 or more peripheral joints, characterized by tenderness, swelling, or effusion

系统性红斑狼疮完整ppt课件

系统性红斑狼疮完整ppt课件

03
治疗原则与方法
一般治疗原则
个体化治疗
根据患者的具体病情、年 龄、性别等因素,制定个 性化的治疗方案。
早期诊断与治疗
尽早发现并确诊SLE,及时 启动治疗,以减轻器官损 害和提高患者生活质量。
综合治疗
采用药物治疗、非药物治 疗及患者教育等多种手段, 全面控制SLE病情。
药物选择及作用机制
糖皮质激素
诊断与鉴别诊断
诊断标准及流程
诊断标准
采用美国风湿病学会(ACR)或欧洲 抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/ACR的分类 标准,包括临床表现、免疫学异常及 组织学改变等方面。
诊断流程
详细询问病史,进行全面体格检查,针 对性选择实验室检查和影像学检查,综 合分析结果,确立诊断。
鉴别诊断及相关检查
鉴别诊断
需与类风湿关节炎、干燥综合征、皮肌炎等风湿性疾病相鉴别,同时排除感染、 肿瘤等其他疾病。
保持低盐、低脂、优质蛋白饮 食;适当锻炼,增强免疫力; 避免吸烟和饮酒等不良习惯。
避免诱发因素
避免阳光暴晒、减少接触化学 物质和药物等可能诱发疾病活
动的因素。
处理方法指导
感染处理
一旦发生感染,应立即就医,根据感染类型和严重程度选用 合适的抗生素治疗。同时,加强护理和营养支持,促进康复。
心血管疾病处理
血浆置换
通过去除患者血浆中的免疫复合物和其他有害物质,达到缓解症状 的目的。
干细胞移植
通过移植健康的造血干细胞,重建患者的免疫系统,适用于严重 SLE患者。
患者教育与心理支持
加强对患者的健康教育,提高其对SLE的认识和自我管理能力;同时 给予心理支持,帮助患者树立战胜疾病的信心。
04
并发症预防与处理

PPT系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)ppt课件

PPT系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)ppt课件

02 红斑狼疮(SLE)的 病因和发病机制
遗传因素
家族聚集性
遗传与环境交互作用
SLE有明显的家族聚集性,患者家族 成员中患病率高于一般人群。
遗传因素与环境因素共同作用,增加 SLE的发病风险。
遗传易感性
某些基因变异与SLE的易感性相关, 如HLA-DR2、HLA-DR3等。
环境因素
感染
某些病毒、细菌感染可能触发SLE 的发病,如EB病毒、细小病毒 B19等。
05 红斑狼疮(SLE)的 治疗和预后
治疗原则和目标
治疗原则
早期诊断,合理治疗,控制病情,预 防复发
治疗目标
缓解症状,减轻组织损害,提高生活 质量,延长生存期
药物治疗
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)
用于缓解轻至中度疼痛和发热
糖皮质激素
控制炎症,缓解症状,需根据病情调整剂 量
免疫抑制剂
生物制剂
用于控制病情活动,减少激素用量,如环 磷酰胺、硫唑嘌呤等
针对特定靶点进行治疗,如抗B细胞抗体、 抗TNF-α抗体等
非药物治疗
01
02
03
心理治疗
帮助患者缓解焦虑、抑郁 等情绪问题,提高生活质 量
健康教育
指导患者进行自我管理和 保健,如避免阳光暴晒、 预防感染等
并发症防治
积极预防和治疗感染、骨 质疏松等并发症
预后和随访
预后因素
早期诊断、合理治疗、病情活动度、脏器损害程度等影响预后
紫外线辐射
紫外线辐射可诱发或加重SLE的皮 肤症状。
药物和化学物质
某些药物(如异烟肼、普鲁卡因胺 等)和化学物质(如硅、石棉等) 可能与SLE的发病有关。
免疫异常
自身抗体产生

系统性红斑狼疮

系统性红斑狼疮

SLE的病因
系统性红斑狼疮发病机制不明,目前认为是 人体免疫系统被异常激活,攻击自身组织引 起的。在遗传因素、环境因素、雌激素水平 等各种因素相互作用下,导致T淋巴细胞减少、 T抑制细胞功能降低、B细胞过度增生,产生 大量的自身抗体,并与体内相应的自身抗原 结合形成相应的免疫复合物,沉积在皮肤、 关节、小血管、肾小球等部位。
感染的预防和监控
发生感染部位 感染的发生率
请替换文字内容
请替换文字内容
感染发生的危 险因素
免疫细胞数量和 功能的检测
诱导期感染部位以皮肤软组织和 肺最常见,病原体以病毒、细菌 和真菌常见。维持期感染以泌 尿 系统和皮肤感染最常见,病原体 以细菌最常见。
免疫抑制治疗前应评估感染的风 险及排除潜在的感染,把握免疫 抑制药物使用时机和控制免疫抑 制药物的剂量
SLE患者合并重要脏器累及的治疗
(二)SLE-神经精神狼疮
通过临床表现、血液学、自身抗体与脑脊液检查以及神经影像学表现对神经精神狼疮进行诊断, 并与抗磷脂综合征引起的神经症状进行鉴别
诊断:
MRI是诊断神经精神狼疮有效的影像学检查 神经精神狼疮患者MRI异常(包括脑萎缩、T1和T2 加权病变 等)更为常见,并且与特定的神经精神 狼疮表现相关。
或复发性 SLE患者,使用免疫抑制剂可减少激素的使用量,控制疾病 活动,提高临床缓解率。
治疗
(二)治疗方法—免疫抑制剂
不同免疫抑制剂的适应症、优势及常见与重要的不良反应
治疗
(二)治疗方法—生物制剂
对难治性(经常规治疗效果不佳)或复发性SLE患者, 使用生物制剂能较为显著地增加患者的完全和部分缓 解率,降低疾病活动度、疾病复发率及减少激素用量
身免疫性三系降低 重视治疗,必要时给予一定时间随访 重视治疗史

系统性红斑狼疮pptPPT

系统性红斑狼疮pptPPT

03
免疫抑制治疗通常与糖 皮质激素联合使用,以 提高疗效并减少激素用 量。
04
需要注意的是,免疫抑 制治疗可能增加感染和 肿瘤的风险。
生物治疗
01
02
03
04
利用生物技术手段,如单克隆 抗体、细胞因子等,调节免疫
系统功能。
生物治疗可用于治疗系统性红 斑狼疮的某些特定症状,如狼 疮肾炎、神经精神狼疮等。
临床表现
常见症状包括发热、疲劳、关节疼痛、面部红斑等,严重时可出现肾脏、心脏 等器官损害。
分类
根据病情轻重和受累器官的不同,SLE可分为不同的亚型,如轻度型、中度型和 重度型。
02 系统性红斑狼疮的诊断与 评估
诊断标准与流程
诊断标准
根据临床表现、实验室检查和影像学检查,综合评估后确诊 。
诊断流程
健康教育
通过开展系统性红斑狼疮的科普宣传和教育活动,提高公众对系统性红斑狼疮的认识和预防意识。
早期筛查与干预
早期筛查
定期进行系统性红斑狼疮的筛查,有助于早期发现疾病,提高治疗效果。
干预措施
针对系统性红斑狼疮的高危人群,采取相应的干预措施,如调整生活方式、药物治疗等,以降低发病风险。
社会支持与政策保障
特点
SLE可累及皮肤、关节、肾脏、心 血管、神经系统等多个器官和组 织,病程长且易反复发作。
发病机制与病因
发病机制
SLE的发病机制复杂,涉及遗传、环 境、免疫等多个因素,目前尚未完全 明确。
病因
可能包括遗传易感性、紫外线照射、 某些药物或化学物质等,这些因素可 能触发免疫系统的异常反应。
临床表现与分类
理疏导和支持。
康复知识普及
患者及家属应了解系统性红斑狼 疮的相关知识,包括病情发展、 治疗方法和康复手段等,以便更

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)_图文

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)_图文
抗DNA抗体等自身抗体是LN发病的中心环节
内源性B淋巴细胞过度活化 Th细胞的作用 细胞因子 B细胞本身
循环免疫复合物
肾脏损伤
原位免疫复合物
(免疫复合物介导性肾炎)
LN临床表现
• 囊括了“肾炎”的全部临床表现 • 有两个类型的狼疮性肾炎应引起重

–亚临床型狼疮性肾炎 –隐匿性狼疮性肾炎
亚临床型狼疮性肾炎
系统性红斑狼疮主要症状的发生率
症状 疲劳 发热 消瘦 关节痛 皮肤损害 肾脏病变 胃肠道病变 呼吸道病变 心血管损害 淋巴系统损害 中枢神经症状
发生率(%) 80~100 ﹥80 ﹥60 ~ 95 ﹥ 80 ~ 50 38 0.9 ~ 98 46 ~ 50 25 ~ 75
(引自 Textbook of Rheumatology,3rd.,New York,1989)
• 病情处于缓解期达半年以上 • 无中枢神经系统、肾或心脏严重损害,而病
情处于缓解期达半年以上者,一般能安全妊 娠,并产出正常婴儿。 • 非缓解期患者应避孕 • CTX、MTX、硫唑嘌呤 停用3个月以上方能 妊娠。 • 有习惯性流产病史或抗 磷脂抗体阳性者,妊娠时应服小剂量阿司匹 林。
影响狼疮预后的因素
• 是指病理学上有狼疮性肾炎的特征 性表现,临床上尚未出现任何肾脏 病的症状,实验室检查也无蛋白尿 、血尿、管型尿;也无肾功能损害 的SLE患者。
• 亚临床型狼疮性肾炎往往发生于SLE 病程中的早期,随SLE病程延长,肾 脏组织学损害加重,则逐渐出现肾 脏病的临床表现及实验室异常。
隐匿性狼疮性肾炎
判定:9项标准中3项以上阳性者,可判定SLE为活动期
狼疮的治疗
• 糖皮质激素 • 免疫抑制剂 • 丙种球蛋白 • 控制合并症

第四十二章系统性红斑狼疮

第四十二章系统性红斑狼疮

呼吸系统:约35%患者有干性胸膜炎或胸 腔积液,少数急性狼疮性肺炎,或慢性间质 性肺炎
神经系统:狼疮活动期常表现各种精神症 状和神经症状;其次为脑血管病和脑脊髓 炎临床表现,
消化系统:40%患者有不同程度的食欲减 退、恶心、呕吐、腹痛腹泻、便血等症状。
血液系统:活动期约半数患者有贫血,以及 白细胞减少和(或)血小板减少,短期内出现 重度贫血常是自身免疫性溶血所致。伴淋巴 结、脾肿大
补体: 约75%-90%患者在活动期有补体C3、 C4减少。
狼疮带试验:取皮损部位或腕上方伸侧部位 皮肤活检 ,真皮与表皮连接处有荧光带,为 免疫球蛋白与补体沉积所致。
肾活检:狼疮肾炎的分型诊断、治疗、估计 预后
其他检查:X线、CT、超声心动图等
[诊断与鉴别诊断]
诊断:现采用美国风湿病学会(ACR) SLE分类标准, 共11项, ①颧部红斑;②盘状红斑;③光敏感: ④口腔溃疡;⑤非侵蚀性关节炎,⑥肾脏病变:蛋 白尿≥0.5g/d或细胞管型尿;⑦浆膜炎:胸膜炎或 心包炎;⑧神经系统病变:⑨血液系统异常;溶血 性贫血或白细胞减少血小板减少; ⑩抗ds-DNA抗 体或抗Sm抗体阳性,或抗磷脂抗体阳性 ⑾抗核 抗体阳性。
第四十二章系统性红斑狼疮
[病因和发病机制]
病因:与遗传、内分泌及环境因素有关。 发病机制:患者体内有多种自身抗体以及
由其形成的循环免疫复合物。 引起其血液中细胞数量减少;造成,它是造成多系统 损害的病理学基础。病变中心为纤维素样变性、 坏死,可检测出免疫球蛋白、补体及DNA等自身 抗原。病灶周围有单核细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴 细胞浸润。
将狼疮肾炎病理分型为: I型:正常或轻微病 变型 Ⅱ型:系膜病变型 Ⅲ型:局灶增殖型 Ⅳ型:弥漫增殖型 V型:膜性病变型 Ⅵ型: 肾小球硬化型

系统性红斑狼疮

系统性红斑狼疮
–约20%患者有口腔溃疡或鼻粘膜糜烂、出血
系统性红斑狼疮:手背和甲周红色皮疹
系统性红斑狼疮:手指坏疽
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮:鳞屑丘疹样皮疹(左)及环形皮疹(右)
系统性红斑狼疮:日晒后出现 大疱样皮疹
雷氏现象
临床表现
骨关节肌肉
–SLE可出现肌痛和肌无力,少数可有肌酶谱的增 高。对于长期服用激素的患者,要除外激素所致 的肌病。
SLE的诊断和治疗内容
明确诊断 评估SLE疾病严重程度和活动性 拟订SLE常规治疗方案 处理难控制的病例 抢救SLE危重症 处理或防治药物副作用 处理SLE患者面对的特殊情况,如妊娠、手术等
其中...
前3项为诊疗常规,后4项常需要有经验的专科医生参与和多学科的通力协 作
流行病学
年龄因素
– ①患者家族中本病患病率可高达13%; – ②本病患病率在同一地区不同人种之间有明显
差异; – ③同卵孪生发病率达25%~70%,异卵孪生仅
1%~3%; – ④SLE自身抗体关连基因在患者中的发生频率
明显高于正常人。
病因-性激素
SLE患者体内雌激素水平增高,雄 激素降低,泌乳素水平亦增高。因此生 育期女性的SLE的发病率明显高与同年 龄段的男性、青春期以前的儿童及老年 女性,妊娠后期及产后哺乳期常出现病 情加重,与体内雌激素及泌乳素水平升 高有关。
其他 临床上SLE病人常因上呼吸道感染诱发病情 加重。另外任何过敏也可能使SLE加重,因此 SLE病人必须注意避免多种过敏源,接受计划免 疫接种。
发病机制
B淋巴细胞功能亢进
– 是产生大量自身抗体的直接原因。该细胞还可以自我诱导增 值,放大免疫效应
T淋巴细胞功能失调
– Ts (抑制性T细胞)数量减少;Th2比Th1 (辅助性T细胞)占 优势,总趋势是促进B淋巴细胞功能增强

系统性红斑狼疮系统性红斑狼疮

系统性红斑狼疮系统性红斑狼疮

临床表现与分类
临床表现
SLE的临床表现多样,常见的症状包括皮疹、关节痛、疲劳、 发热等,其他症状包括光过敏、口腔溃疡、肾炎等。
分类
根据临床表现和病情严重程度,SLE可分为轻度、中度和重度 。轻度SLE患者通常仅有皮疹和关节痛等症状,而重度SLE患 者可能出现肾脏、心脏等重要器官的严重损害。
02 系统性红斑狼疮的诊断与 评估
避免诱发因素
01
避免阳光暴晒、避免接触化学物质、避免感染等诱发因素,以
降低疾病发生的风险。
健康生活方式
02
保持健康的生活方式,包括均衡饮食、适量运动、规律作息等,
有助于提高身体免疫力,预防疾病的发生。
遗传咨询与生育指导
03
对于有家族史的人群,进行遗传咨询和生育指导,有助于降低
遗传风险。
日常护理与注意事项
诊断标准与流程
诊断标准
根据国际通用的美国风湿病学会(ACR)诊断标准,系统性红斑狼疮的诊断需 要满足至少4项标准,包括临床指标、免疫学指标、肾脏损害和血液学指标等。
诊断流程
系统性红斑狼疮的诊断需要经过详细的病史采集、体格检查、实验室检查和影 像学检查等步骤,综合各项检查结果进行诊断。
实验室检查与影像学检查
生物治疗技术
利用基因治疗、细胞治疗等技术手 段,纠正免疫系统的异常,为患者 提供更有效的治疗方案。
新型给药技术
开发新型的给药方式和制剂形式, 提高药物的生物利用度和患者的用 药依从性。
THANKS FOR WATCHING
感谢您的观看
预后判断
根据患者的病情严重程度、治疗反应 和自身因素,综合判断患者的预后情 况,为患者提供个性化的治疗建议和 生活指导。
03 系统性红斑狼疮的治疗

系统性红斑狼疮(2024)

系统性红斑狼疮(2024)

2024/1/29
10
03
治疗原则与方案选择
2024/1/29
11
治疗目标及原则
01
02
03
控制疾病活动
通过药物治疗等手段,积 极控制系统性红斑狼疮的 疾病活动,减轻症状,防 止病情恶化。
2024/1/29
保护重要脏器功能
针对受累脏器进行针对性 治疗,保护心、肺、肾等 重要脏器的功能,减少并 发症的发生。
发生风险。
处理方法指导
肾脏并发症处理
根据病情严重程度采取相应治疗措施,如使用免疫抑制剂 、血液透析等。同时控制血压、血糖等危险因素,保护肾 功能。
肺部并发症处理
根据肺部受累情况采取相应治疗措施,如使用抗炎药物、 氧疗等。同时积极控制感染,保持呼吸道通畅。
2024/1/29
心血管并发症处理
针对具体心血管并发症类型进行治疗,如使用抗心律失常 药物、强心剂等。同时控制血脂、改善生活方式以降低心 血管事件风险。
1:9。
遗传因素
SLE具有家族聚集性,同卵双胞 胎同时患病几率高于异卵双胞胎 。此外,某些基因如HLA-DR2 、HLA-DR3等与SLE易感性相关

2024/1/29
5
临床表现与分型
临床表现
SLE的临床表现多样且复杂,常见症状包括发热、关节痛、皮疹、口腔溃疡、 光过敏、肾炎等。此外,还可累及心血管、呼吸、消化、神经等多个系统。
01 02
精准医疗
随着精准医疗理念的深入人心,未来系统性红斑狼疮的治疗将更加注重 个体化和精准化,根据患者的基因型、免疫状态等制定个性化的治疗方 案。
多学科协作
系统性红斑狼疮涉及多个学科领域,未来将有更多的跨学科合作,共同 推动疾病的研究和治疗进步。

系统性红斑狼疮

系统性红斑狼疮

病 因
未明。可能与遗传、环境(紫外线、
药物、过敏、感染、社会与心理压力)
和性激素有关
发病机制
未完全清楚。免疫复合物的形成及沉 积是SLE发病的主要机制
excess antibody formation Immune complex disease
immune complex deposits
病理改变
人民卫生出版社.2002年 2. 陈灏珠主编.实用内科学(第11版).人民 卫生出版社.2001年 3. 蒋明主编.中华风湿病学.华夏出版 社.2004年 4. Goldman:Cecil Text Book of Medicine 21st ed.,W. B. Saunders Company.2000 5. Cecil Essential of Medicine
体表面积,加入生理盐水中静脉滴注, 每月一次 硫唑嘌呤 每日口服50~150mg 氨甲喋呤 剂量10~15mg,每周一次
治 疗
重型SLE的治疗
雷公藤总甙 剂量10~20mg,每日三次 环孢素
每日剂量3~5mg/kg,分2次口服
骁悉(Mycophenolatemofetil,MMF)
每日剂量10~30mg/kg,分2次口服 来氟米特(Leflunomide) 20mg/d
系统性红斑狼疮
四川大学华西医院临床免疫科 刘 钢 教授


系统性红斑狼疮(Systemic lupus
erythematosus,SLE)是一种自身免疫性 结缔组织病,体内有大量致病性自身抗体 和免疫复合物,造成组织损伤,临床可以 出现各个系统和脏器损害的症状。女性患
者占90%,我国患病率70/10万
浆膜炎
肾脏病变

第三章 系统性红斑狼疮

第三章 系统性红斑狼疮

诊断标准
1.颧部红斑 (Malar rash) SLE分类标准 2.盘状红斑 (Discoid rash) (美国风湿学会1982年) 3.光过敏 (Photosensitivity) 4.口腔溃疡 (Oral ulcers) 如 果 11 项 中 有 ≥ 4 项 阳 性 5.关节炎 (Arthritis) (包括在病程中任何时候发 6.浆膜炎 (Serositis) 生的),则可诊断为SLE, 7.肾病变 (Renal disorder) 8.神经系统病变 (Neurologic disorder) 其特异性为98%,敏感性 9.血液系统异常 (Hematologic disorder) 为97%。 10.免疫学异常 (Immunologic disorder) 11.抗核抗体阳性 (Positive antinuclear antibodies)
周减10%。
泼尼松减至小剂量时(每日0.5mg/kg),减量应更慢。 激素冲击疗法:用于急性暴发性危重SLE,即用甲泼尼龙
l000mg/d,连用3天,接着使用大剂量泼尼松如上述。
不良反应
如向心性肥胖、血糖升高、高血压、诱发感染、股骨头 无菌性坏死、骨质疏松等,应密切监测。
常用激素的等效剂量
白尿者,用泼尼松,每日量为0.5mg~1mg/kg。
重型:病情较重,伴心、脑、肾等主要脏器受累,发生
溶血性贫血或血小板减少伴出血倾向时,予泼尼松每日 1mg/kg或(和)甲泼尼龙冲击疗法,同时免疫抑制剂治疗。
缓解期:每日晨服泼尼松7.5mg。
狼疮肾炎的治疗


泼尼松每日1mg/kg或(和)甲泼尼龙冲击疗法。 同时CTX冲击,待病情好转后可以改为口服或改用硫唑嘌
SLE病情的判断
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

inflammation has been suggested as a mechanism mediating the accelerated atherosclerosisobserved in SLE. The recognition that inflammation is important in the pathogenesis ofatherosclerosis came from pathological studies 7, animal models 8, and the realization that acutephase markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP)9 were independently associated with the riskof future cardiovascular events. In addition to CRP, several other markers or mediators ofinflammation have been associated with atherosclerosis or cardiovascular risk. These includetumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)10, interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1α), vascular endothelialgrowth factor (VEGF)11, myeloperoxidase (MPO)12, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)13, serum amyloid A (SAA)14, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM), intercellularadhesion molecule (ICAM) and E-selectin 15,16.The molecular basis of inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in SLE has not beenstudied extensively. Large prospective cohort studies that examine the relationship betweeninflammatory markers and cardiovascular outcomes such as myocardial infarction are notfeasible, given the relative rarity of SLE. However, the ability to detect and quantify coronaryatherosclerosis non-invasively through the measurement of coronary calcium by electron beamcomputed tomography (EBCT) can provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlyingaccelerated atherosclerosis.We previously reported that both the prevalence and severity of coronary artery calciumdetected by EBCT were increased in patients with SLE 3 and that concentrations of IL-6 wereincreased and associated with coronary calcification 17. The present study extends that workto address the role of other cytokines, inflammatory enzymes, acute-phase reactants andadhesion molecules that have been associated with cardiovascular disease or atherosclerosisin the general population 9,15. Thus, we addressed the hypothesis that concentration ofcytokines (TNF-α, IL-1α, and VEGF), inflammatory enzymes (MPO and MMP-9), acute-phase reactants (ESR, CRP and SAA) and adhesion molecules (VCAM, ICAM and E-selectin)are increased in SLE and contribute to the pathogenesis of accelerated atherosclerosis.MethodsPatientsThis was a cross-sectional study of 187 subjects (109 patients with SLE and 78 controlsubjects). Patients were older than 18 years and fulfilled the 1997 ACR classification criteriaof SLE 18 for at least one year; control subjects did not meet classification criteria for anyrheumatic disease. Subjects with a history of angina, acute myocardial infarction, or strokewere excluded. The subjects represent a cohort that has been studied to determine therelationship between inflammation and atherosclerosis and the methods used have beendescribed in detail 3,6,17,19. The study was approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Board ofReview and all subjects gave written informed consent.Clinical AssessmentEach subject was evaluated clinically through a structured interview, physical examination,medical chart review and laboratory assessment. Disease activity indices such as SystemicLupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)20 and Systemic Lupus InternationalCollaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SLICC/ACRdamage index)21 and a drug history that included cumulative corticosteroid dosage wereobtained in patients with SLE. All subjects underwent coronary calcium measurement throughEBCT scanning as previously described 3 and the degree of calcification was quantified asdescribed by Agatston et al.22NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptLaboratory AssessmentWhole blood was drawn by venipuncture for determination of a complete blood count, serumcreatinine, glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-densitylipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined in patients only by the Vanderbilt University Hospitalclinical laboratory. Assays for cytokines, adhesion molecules and inflammatory enzymesassociated with atherosclerosis were performed using the Lincoplex ® Multiplex ImmunoassayKit (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO, USA). The following inflammatory mediators weremeasured - E-selectin, VCAM, ICAM, TNF-α, VEGF, MMP-9, MPO, SAA, and IL-1α.Statistical AnalysisClinical parameters were described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and inflammatorymediators as median with interquartile range [IQR]. Concentrations of inflammatory mediatorswere compared between patients with SLE and control subjects using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.The correlation between inflammatory mediators and clinical variables as well as coronary calcium severity was assessed in patients with SLE using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) and its corresponding test. To assess independent effects of each marker ofinflammation on the severity of coronary calcification in patients with SLE, proportional oddslogistic regression models were used to adjust for traditional cardiovascular risk factors asdetermined by the Framingham risk score,23 the presence of diabetes and cumulativecorticosteroid dose. Additional models were applied to further examine the relationshipbetween inflammatory mediators and coronary calcium. To preserve regression power, andavoid multicollinearity by including multiple correlated variables, we combined ICAM,VCAM and E-selectin into a single component variable (“adhesion molecules”), and similarlyESR and CRP into a single component (“inflammatory markers”) via principal componentsanalysis 24. Inflammation markers were logarithm transformed to achieve normal distributionand improve model goodness of fit.Statistical analysis was performed with R 2.4.0 () and a two sided 5%significance level was considered significant. The authors had full access to the data and takeresponsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript as written.ResultsClinical Data and Markers of InflammationDemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with SLE and control subjects are shownin Table 1. The study population was comprised predominantly of middle-aged females (~90%)with a similar proportion in both patient and control groups. As reported previously 3, patientswith SLE were more often hypertensive, had higher levels of serum triglycerides and highercoronary calcium scores (Table 1). The concentrations of inflammatory markers are shown inTable 2. Levels of E-selectin, ICAM, MPO, SAA, VEGF, and TNF-α were significantly higherin patients with SLE than control subjects (all P<0.05).Markers of Inflammation in Patients with SLEMeasures of disease activity (SLEDAI) and damage (SLICC) did not correlate strongly withinflammatory markers; SLEDAI was significantly correlated with ESR and CRP (ρ=0.21 and0.19), and SLICC with E-selectin (ρ=0.19). The Framingham score was significantly correlatedwith acute-phase reactants (CRP ρ=0.23, and SAA ρ=0.25,) and age (ρ=0.73) – which is acomponent of the score (all p<0.05). There was no significant association between the adhesionmolecules and cumulative steroid dosage (P values all >0.05). Furthermore, concentrations ofNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptICAM (p=0.89), VCAM (p=0.41) and E-selectin (p=0.26) were similar in subjects currentlyreceiving corticosteroids and those who were not.Relationship between Clinical and Inflammatory Measures and Coronary Artery Calcium in Patients with SLE The relationships between markers of inflammation and coronary calcium are shown in Figure 1. The Spearman correlations indicated that E-selectin, VCAM, ICAM, SAA and CRP were significantly associated with coronary calcium (P value <0.05). TNF-α and the adhesion molecules E-selectin, VCAM and ICAM remained independently associated with the severity of coronary calcium adjusted for covariates (Framingham risk score, diabetes and cumulative corticosteroid exposure). In addition, to further examine the relationship between inflammatory mediators and coronary calcium we have applied additional models by combining multiple correlated variables, ICAM, VCAM and E-selectin into a single component variable (“adhesion molecules”), and similarly ESR and CRP into a single component (“inflammatory markers”)via principal components analysis. The components of “adhesion molecules” and “inflammatory markers” contained 60% and 67% of the variation in each set of original variables, respectively. The effect of TNF-α adjusted for Framingham risk score, diabetes,cumulative corticosteroid dose (p=0.027), was attenuated by further adjustment for the adhesion molecules and inflammation markers components (p-value for TNF-α=0.20). In this model, the effect of the adhesion molecules component was statistically significant (p=0.015),whereas that of inflammation markers was not (p=0.872).Discussion This is the first study to report the relationships between several inflammatory mediators implicated in the pathogenesis of accelerated atherosclerosis and coronary calcification in patients with SLE. The major finding of this study – that the adhesion molecules VCAM,ICAM, E-selectin, and the cytokine TNF-α are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis inpatients with SLE independent of Framingham risk score –provides new insights intomechanisms that may contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis associated with inflammation.Although substantial evidence links mediators of inflammation with atherosclerosis in thegeneral population, there is little information about this relationship in patients with SLE, agroup recently recognized to have accelerated atherosclerosis 3,4. One reason for the lack ofinformation about the relationship between mediators of inflammation and atherosclerosis inSLE is that it is difficult to perform large prospective studies of cardiovascular events becausethe disease is relatively uncommon. Recently, the ability to non-invasively and accuratelyquantify the atherosclerotic burden in the coronary arteries using EBCT, and the recognitionthat coronary calcium is a strong predictor of risk of cardiovascular events, have provided ameans for examining the burden of atherosclerosis, and its potential causes, in SLE 25.The accelerated atherosclerosis associated with SLE is thought to be related to inflammationbut few studies have addressed this question, and there is little information relevant to thedevelopment of coronary atherosclerosis. Most studies used carotid ultrasound to detectatherosclerotic plaque in SLE. Antibodies to oxidized LDL 26, anti-oxPAPC (oxidizedpalmitoyl arachidonoyl phosphocholine) antibodies 27, TGF-β128 and anti-phospholipidantibodies 29 have been associated with carotid atherosclerosis. Coronary calcification has beenassociated with asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA)30 and high C3 concentrations 31 inSLE. Our study provides information about several inflammatory cardiovascular risk factors,some evaluated for the first time, in coronary atherosclerosis associated with SLE.Concentrations of many inflammatory markers associated with atherosclerosis in the generalpopulation were higher in patients with SLE than in controls. Interestingly, the disease activityNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscriptindex (SLEDAI) correlated weakly with the ESR and CRP but not with other mediators. Thismay in part reflect the relatively low SLEDAI scores since the patient population had stabledisease. However, it may also suggest that the SLEDAI does not capture important componentsof persistent inflammation as reflected by increased concentrations of adhesion molecules.Adhesion molecules such as VCAM, ICAM and E-selectin are detectable after injury to theendothelium, and may play a role early in the atherogenic process.32 In animal models deletionof the genes coding for E-selectin or ICAM attenuated the development of atherosclerosis.33,34 Also, in the general population, increased concentrations of adhesion molecules areassociated with atherosclerosis. 15,16 However, in a single study adhesion molecules (VCAMand ICAM) were not associated with the presence or absence of carotid plaque in SLE 4. In ourstudy VCAM, ICAM and E-selectin were associated with coronary calcification independentof Framingham risk score, diabetes and cumulative corticosteroid dose. Interestingly, despitethe association with coronary calcification, concentrations of VCAM in patients with SLE werenot significantly different from those of control subjects. This may imply that the role of VCAMin atherogenesis is enhanced in the setting of more active inflammation.TNF-α is an important cytokine in inflammation and atherogenesis 35, and TNF-αconcentrations are elevated in SLE 36. There is little information about TNF-α and coronarycalcium in any population 37, and our findings suggest that TNF-α may play a role inatherogenesis in SLE. The other potentially atherogenic inflammatory mediators – MPO,IL-1α, MMP-9, VEGF, CRP and SAA were not significantly associated with coronaryatherosclerosis after adjustment for Framingham risk score, diabetes and corticosteroidexposure. Thus, it is likely that in the setting of persistent inflammation, specific mediators areassociated with atherosclerosis.We studied a population with asymptomatic, subclinical atherosclerosis. Thus, the findingssuggest that adhesion molecules and TNF-α may contribute at a relatively early stage ofatherosclerotic vascular disease in this population and therefore may represent a potential targetfor the prevention of subsequent symptomatic atherosclerosis in patients with SLE.This study, which has the advantages of directly studying the relationship betweeninflammatory mediators and an objective measure of coronary atherosclerosis, has limitations.It was a cross-sectional study, and since atherogenesis is a long-term process, longitudinalstudies including serial evaluations would provide additional valuable information. We did notadjust for multiple statistical comparisons since the hypotheses were prespecified, thus thereis the possibility of detecting false-positive relationships due to multiple comparisons.In conclusion, the adhesion molecules VCAM, ICAM and E-selectin, and the cytokine TNF-α are associated with coronary atherosclerosis independent of Framingham risk score.AcknowledgementsNone.Sources of Funding: Supported by NIH grants HL65082 and GM5M01-RR00095.References1. Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005;352(16):1685–95. [PubMed: 15843671]2. Urowitz MB, Bookman AA, Koehler BE, Gordon DA, Smythe HA, Ogryzlo MA. The bimodalmortality pattern of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 1976;60(2):221–5. [PubMed: 1251849]NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript3. Asanuma Y, Oeser A, Shintani AK, Turner E, Olsen N, Fazio S, et al. Premature coronary-artery atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2003;349(25):2407–15. [PubMed:14681506]4. Roman MJ, Shanker BA, Davis A, Lockshin MD, Sammaritano L, Simantov R, et al. Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2003;349(25):2399–406. [PubMed: 14681505]5. Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Grodzicky T, Li Y, Panaritis C, du BR, et al. Traditional Framingham risk factors fail to fully account for accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis Rheum 2001;44(10):2331–7. [PubMed: 11665973]6. Chung CP, Oeser A, Avalos I, Raggi P, Stein CM. Cardiovascular risk scores and the presence of subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2006;15(9):562–9. [PubMed: 17080910]7. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 1993;362(6423):801–9. [PubMed: 8479518]8. Russell JC, Proctor SD. Small animal models of cardiovascular disease: tools for the study of the roles of metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol 2006;15(6):318–30.[PubMed: 17113010]9. Pai JK, Pischon T, Ma J, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Joshipura K, et al. Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. N Engl J Med 2004;351(25):2599–610. [PubMed:15602020]10. Skoog T, Dichtl W, Boquist S, Skoglund-Andersson C, Karpe F, Tang R, et al. Plasma tumour necrosis factor-alpha and early carotid atherosclerosis in healthy middle-aged men. Eur Heart J 2002;23(5):376–83. [PubMed: 11846495]11. Inoue M, Itoh H, Ueda M, Naruko T, Kojima A, Komatsu R, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions: possible pathophysiological significance of VEGF in progression of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1998;98(20):2108–16. [PubMed:9815864]12. Zhang R, Brennan ML, Fu X, Aviles RJ, Pearce GL, Penn MS, et al. Association between myeloperoxidase levels and risk of coronary artery disease. JAMA 2001;286(17):2136–42. [PubMed:11694155]13. Fukuda D, Shimada K, Tanaka A, Kusuyama T, Yamashita H, Ehara S, et al. Comparison of levelsof serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with acute myocardial infarction versus unstableangina pectoris versus stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2006;97(2):175–80. [PubMed: 16442358]14. Johnson BD, Kip KE, Marroquin OC, Ridker PM, Kelsey SF, Shaw LJ, et al. Serum amyloid A as apredictor of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular outcome in women: the National Heart, Lung,and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation2004;109(6):726–32. [PubMed: 14970107]15. Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, Smith LC, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, et al. Circulating adhesionmolecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heartdisease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation 1997;96(12):4219–25. [PubMed: 9416885]16. Rohde LE, Lee RT, Rivero J, Jamacochian M, Arroyo LH, Briggs W, et al. Circulating cell adhesionmolecules are correlated with ultrasound-based assessment of carotid atherosclerosis. ArteriosclerThromb Vasc Biol 1998;18(11):1765–70. [PubMed: 9812916]17. Asanuma Y, Chung CP, Oeser A, Shintani A, Stanley E, Raggi P, et al. Increased concentration ofproatherogenic inflammatory cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship tocardiovascular risk factors. J Rheumatol 2006;33(3):539–45. [PubMed: 16463434]18. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classificationof systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40(9):1725. [PubMed: 9324032]19. Chung CP, Avalos I, Oeser A, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A, Raggi P, et al. High prevalence of themetabolic syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: association with diseasecharacteristics and cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66(2):208–14. [PubMed:16901956]NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript20. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35(6):630–40. [PubMed: 1599520]21. Gladman D, Ginzler E, Goldsmith C, Fortin P, Liang M, Urowitz M, et al. The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39(3):363–9. [PubMed: 8607884]22. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15(4):827–32. [PubMed: 2407762]23. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection,Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106(25):3143–421. [PubMed: 12485966]24. Rao CR. The Use and Interpretation of Principal Component Analysis in Applied Research. Sankhya 1964;26:329–58.25. Ardehali R, Nasir K, Kolandaivelu A, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS. Screening patients for subclinical atherosclerosis with non-contrast cardiac CT. Atherosclerosis 2007;192(2):235–42. [PubMed:17467714]26. Svenungsson E, Jensen-Urstad K, Heimburger M, Silveira A, Hamsten A, de FU, et al. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Circulation 2001;104(16):1887–93.[PubMed: 11602489]27. Doria A, Shoenfeld Y, Wu R, Gambari PF, Puato M, Ghirardello A, et al. Risk factors for subclinical atherosclerosis in a prospective cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62(11):1071–7. [PubMed: 14583570]28. Jackson M, Ahmad Y, Bruce IN, Coupes B, Brenchley PE. Activation of transforming growth factor-beta1 and early atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8(3):R81.[PubMed: 16646981]29. Ahmad Y, Shelmerdine J, Bodill H, Lunt M, Pattrick MG, Teh LS, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): the relative contribution of classic risk factors and the lupusphenotype. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46(6):983–8. [PubMed: 17384179]30. Kiani AN, Mahoney JA, Petri M. Asymmetric dimethylarginine is a marker of poor prognosis andcoronary calcium in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2007;34(7):1502–5. [PubMed:17611963]31. Manger K, Kusus M, Forster C, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Kalden JR, et al. Factors associated withcoronary artery calcification in young female patients with SLE. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62(9):846–50. [PubMed: 12922957]32. Wu JT, Wu LL. Association of soluble markers with various stages and major events ofatherosclerosis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2005;35(3):240–50. [PubMed: 16081579]33. Dong ZM, Chapman SM, Brown AA, Frenette PS, Hynes RO, Wagner DD. The combined role of P-and E-selectins in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest 1998;102(1):145–52. [PubMed: 9649568]34. Collins RG, Velji R, Guevara NV, Hicks MJ, Chan L, Beaudet AL. P-Selectin or intercellular adhesionmolecule (ICAM)-1 deficiency substantially protects against atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Exp Med 2000;191(1):189–94. [PubMed: 10620617]35. Popa C, Netea MG, van Riel PL, van der Meer JW, Stalenhoef AF. The role of TNF-alpha in chronicinflammatory conditions, intermediary metabolism, and cardiovascular risk. J Lipid Res 2007;48(4):751–62. [PubMed: 17202130]36. Studnicka-Benke A, Steiner G, Petera P, Smolen JS. Tumour necrosis factor alpha and its solublereceptors parallel clinical disease and autoimmune activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br JRheumatol 1996;35(11):1067–74. [PubMed: 8948291]37. Krasniak A, Drozdz M, Pasowicz M, Chmiel G, Michalek M, Szumilak D, et al. Factors involved invascular calcification and atherosclerosis in maintenance haemodialysis patients. Nephrol DialTransplant 2007;22(2):515–21. [PubMed: 17050638]NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptFigure 1.Univariate Spearman Correlation Coefficients and Adjusted Odds Ratios for the Outcome ofCoronary Calcification Severity by Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Mediators*Proportional odds model was used to calculate odds ratios for increasing coronarycalcification severity (N=107). †Models were adjusted for Framingham risk score, cumulativesteroids use and presence of diabetes. Odds ratios for inflammation markers are presented forthe effect of log-transformed interquartile range difference. OR: Odds Ratio. 95%CI: 95%Confidence Interval.NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript Clinical Parameters in Patients with SLE and Control SubjectsFactor Controls N=78SLE N=109P* Age (Years)40.5±12.040.2±11.50.863 Sex(Female)85.9%91.7%0.202 BMI (kg/m2)26.99±6.029.18±7.490.049 Hypertension16.7%45.0%<0.001 Diabetes 1.3% 4.6%0.206 Smoker17.9%26.6%0.165 SBP (mmHg)117.2±14.0119.7±17.30.499 DBP (mmHg)71.0±10.073.9±13.60.226 Glucose (mg/dl)85.8±9.586.9±26.00.207 Cholesterol (mg/dl)179.5±42.0175.1±47.10.182 HDL (mg/dl)49.1±15.647.2±14.80.564 LDL (mg/dl)111.1±34.9104.0±38.20.058 Triglycerides (mg/dl)97.1±55.9119.1±58.60.003 Framingham Score 5.2±7.5 6.0±6.30.467 Agatston Score 3.87±28.343.12±192.60.002Data are presented as mean±SD or percentages. BMI: Body Mass Index. SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure. DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure.*Wilcoxon rank sum test, percentages used chi-square test.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript Concentrations of Inflammatory Markers and Mediators in Patients with SLE and Control SubjectsControl SLEMarker Median [IQR]Median [IQR]P*E-selectin (ng/ml)18.4 [14.0–22.9]23.9 [17.7–28.6]<0.001 VCAM (ng/ml)1016.8 [836.8–1116.5]1077.4 [887.9–1203.3]0.09 ICAM (ng/ml)144.4 [120.8–179.4]175.4 [135.1–226.5]0.001 MPO (ng/ml)20.0 [11.2–29.0]25.0 [15.0–45.7]0.02 MMP-9 (ng/ml)89.8 [59.2–140.3]81.5 [55.6–129.2]0.38 SAA (ug/ml) 1.2 [0.6–2.4] 2.5 [1.2–6.1]<0.001 ESR (mm/hr)-17 [9–35]-CRP (mg/l)- 4.0 [0.6–7]-TNF-α (pg/ml) 2.4 [1.9–3.1] 4.8 [3.0–7.9]<0.001 IL-1α (pg/ml)128.3 [18.7–414.6]120.7 [13.9–672.8]0.84 VEGF (pg/ml)30.8[7.5–77.1]40.0 [18.2–81.7]0.04IQR: Interquartile Range.*Wilcoxon rank sum test.。

相关文档
最新文档