人肉搜索的利与弊的英语演讲稿
人肉搜索弊大于利 一辩稿
谢谢主席,大家晚上好!今天我方观点是:人肉搜索弊大于利。
人肉搜索,是一种以互联网为媒介,以人工方式对搜索引擎所提供的信息逐个辨别真伪,或通过匿名知情人提供数据,以查找人物和事件真相的群体运动。
显而易见,网络只是一种工具,而以互联网为媒介的人肉搜索却离不开人的参与。
我方认为,人肉搜索弊大于利,理由有三。
第一,人肉搜索因为脱离不了人的参与,其过程的侵权性与结果的不确定性是固有存在的。
其侵权性体现在对人肉对象的人身攻击、名誉权,隐私权侵害三个方面。
其次,由于参与群体的价值观各有不同,其对事件行为的看法就有了其主观性与片面性。
而且群体的活动易使人民大众自认为正义的道德谴责脱离理性的轨道,最终对人肉对象造成的摧毁远远超出了这个事件的本身。
最重要的是,人肉搜索本身就是因现阶段公权力监督缺失所衍生出存在巨大弊端的替代品,所以我们所做的应是去强化各部门职能,而不是加强对人肉搜索中产生的问题的完善与监督,因为本质问题是无法解决的。
第二,引发人肉搜索的话题是由其引导人决定的,易遭他人利用,无法达到维护社会的目的。
群体狂热起来是是不具备理性的,思想情感易受旁人暗示,甚至失去自控,肆无忌惮。
而恰恰是这点,极易遭到别有用心者的利用,去传播虚假不良信息,拉动舆论导向而达到个人目的。
比如恶毒后妈事件只是治不起病的人为了索要医药费而设计的炒作。
正如网络推手“立二拆四”所言:有热点的地方就有广告营销价值,很多企业都在追寻无边的网友们作为营销对象。
当进行人肉搜索的网民沦为被利用的工具之时,人肉搜索的价值何在第三,不可否认,“人肉搜索”很多时候是一种无奈,网友们利用互联网的特性,自发进行“侦破”,目的是希望用社会道德评判去约束不道德行为。
可那成百上千的,被群众们谩骂,精神上遭受极端的痛苦,甚至因此结束了生命的无辜的受害者们,又该由谁对他们负责所以人肉搜索本来就是一个缺乏理性的盲目且无法律约束的畸形维权途径,以“很黄很暴力”事件为例,被搜索者仅仅是个孩子,她的世界观、人生观尚未成熟,仅仅是因为某些话说得不够得体,就沦为“人肉搜索”对象,遭遇了肆意的攻击、侮辱,这时我们还能不能说“人肉搜索”是在伸张正义呢更多时候它反而像把乱箭,刺痛了的多是那些无辜的受害者!眼下,受到网络“人肉搜索”伤害的当事人不仅难以讨回公道,提供“人肉搜索”的网站往往还敷衍塞责。
“人肉搜索”的英文文献
The Most Heated Discussion About "Human Flesh Search"Abstract: in recent years, appeared in the field of Internet "human flesh search" phenomenon, has been more and more attention by people. On the one hand, the "human flesh search" has a certain significance to social supervision by public opinion, on the other hand, it usually is a group for one person to the so-called moral judgment, often involving violations of personal privacy and infringement of citizens' other legitimate rights and interests. Therefore, in order to protect the lawful rights and interests of citizens and at the same time, play a role of "human flesh search" positive, rational of constraint has important theoretical and realistic significance.Key words: the Internet; Human flesh search; The infringement; The right to privacy1 what is "human flesh search"In the online world, people mainly adopt the way of network retrieval or search the Internet for information. At present, the Internet offers a variety of search tools, such as classification of type directory search engine, search engine keywords retrieval, content retrieval technology, such as additional search sites such as baidu, Google, to the people a lot of information retrieval provides a lot of help. And "human flesh search" is in recent years, after traditional search tools, in the field of Internet search of the new network search tool.(1) the concept of "human flesh search""Human flesh search" as a way to search, is relying on tens of thousands of natives and is no longer just rely on the network database, is a kind of natives spontaneously, the collective action. Internet users can make use of Google, Baidu, such as super search engine, enter different keyword; Query from the object of the search target, the target object and friends blog, podcast, BBS, QQ space, etc., to find clues; And use some common and community websites such as taboo, Tanya, mop,baidu tibia, sina BBS, etc., to search for the target object could leave the registration of marks; Through the search target ID or email address, check the IP Numbers, lock the target range in real life, and then determine the true identity, etc.(2) the characteristics of the "human flesh search"Compared with traditional search engines, "human flesh search" has its own characteristics: first, the "human flesh search" is a kind of intelligent type search has the universality. Second, the "human flesh search" can be used as a way of self-help. Because "human flesh search" generalized, their comments can serve as a kind of evaluation mechanism. But, "human flesh search" also has certain blindness. Thanks to answer the question of objects of all kinds, each have each type of knowledge and personality, which must answer the question with some irrational factors. Even too emotional respondents in quite a rough way to attack object of discussion. As we saw, was human flesh search on the net after the identity is "search" exposure, proper criticism is should, but the irrational abuse had strayed from the right reason. This kind of irrational factors, caused by search people great harm, even violated the legitimacy of its personal rights.2 the legal nature of "human flesh search"(1) "human flesh search" is a double-edged sword, "justice" or "evil"First of all, in terms of the essence of "human flesh search", it is a way of searching for information, to make up for the inadequacy of traditional search engines. On the one hand, from a technical point of view, it is of superiority, its itself is not evil, the source of rational use of information retrieval technology innovation performance. "5 • 12" wenchuan after the earthquake, Google's technical personnel are first made specifically for "human flesh search engine" find relatives. The mailbag search platform gathered in the short term and earthquake emergency hospital site news, let users search anxiously looking for loved ones. It also highlighted the "human flesh search" justice of the engine. As months of the south China tiger event can eventuallyfalls out, "human flesh search" power also is obvious. But on the other hand, if the "human flesh search" improper use of words, is a disaster for the people. As in the China central television (CCTV) reported on the network audio and video news, appeared a Beijing middle school schoolgirls zhang said in an interview. The girl said in an interview: "the last time I use the Internet, suddenly pop up a web page, very erotic, very violent, I hasten to give it to shut." In the end, the students' personal information are exposed, give zhang caused great impact, because the victim is a minor, and thus the case caused more people to the problem of human flesh search invasion of privacy.(2) the "human flesh search" violated the legitimate rights and interests of citizensThe scholar thinks, network has played a positive role in supervision, public opinion, prompted both parties on the conscience of the enlightenment, also others have touched and constraints to the society. However, these are the information that "human flesh search", did not consult the opinion of the search, under the condition of the client without knowing or reluctant, became public, and from the social various aspects attack even scratch faze. The author believed that person don't scruple the legitimate rights and interests of others, such as personal privacy and dignity of the law has given all the rights and interests of people in search of such a "human flesh search" improper network, should belong to the infringement behavior in legal nature. Therefore, in such event, whether online or in real life, "human flesh search" is a violation of the parties legitimate rights and interests, also to the real life of the parties caused serious influence, just very special tort way and carrier.(3) the "human flesh search" relating to the infringement behavior characteristics"Human flesh search" in our country also has a number of sensational network events. Such as: "women's abuse cat" events, events, "Beijing female white-collar Jiang Yan suicide", wenchuan earthquake call names "liaoning women" event. We see, this kind of event mode of "human flesh search", is the lock person or event in reallife as the search object, and then launch a native, release the related information, such as name, age, phone number, QQ number, email, home address, etc. Also appeared in some so-called "fatwa" network, online outrage, hunting on the parties, even out of the network virtual world, spread into the real world. That the parties not powerful mental pressure and social pressure, normal life, work, study to a party with devastating effect. Based on above the summary of the events of "human flesh search", "human flesh search" involved in the infringement, usually has the following several characteristics: first, the universality of infringement behavior person. Second, the diversity of the object of infringement. Third, the complexity of tort liability cognizance.In a word, "human flesh search" involving infringement fact is that not to hide, especially some interference with the privacy of citizens has over the normal moral bottom line. As is known to all, "the law is the minimum moral". Although some events of "human flesh search" has a certain moral can condemn sex, but because of the "human flesh search" behavior such as infringement of reputation, privacy, and disturb others life must be the regulation of the law.3 how to regulate the "human flesh search""Human flesh search" starting from the date of birth has been hovering between law and morality, in which the illegal behavior, have already beyond the bottom line of justice. There is no doubt that the "human flesh search" regulation in legislation is imperative. Rather than on the legal regulation, must pay attention to the following two aspects:(1) clear "human flesh search" relating to the infringement behavior subject and its legal liability"Human flesh search" relating to the infringement behavior main body shall include: "bounty hunters", Internet users and network operators.First of all, as a problem to search the original publisher, "bounty hunters" will be released. On the one hand, some questions have a Ming harm the directivity of infringing upon the citizen right of privacy. When they publish information or, on theother hand, published articles, make the party in the reality is accordingly under attack, or the damaged caused by false public comments, would be easy to violate the privacy rights of the parties and reputation. So it should be correct motive, guarantee the authenticity of the comment, active protection related to people's privacy.Second, "human flesh search" the biggest characteristic is of many Internet users get to participate in, for "human flesh search" of Internet users, there are the following several types: one is the organization launched a "human flesh search", is one is in real life according to oneself know the victim's personal information and privacy, etc, shall be publicly disclosed on the Internet users for the first time. One is referring to on the network, has publicly on the Internet for various kinds of normal reasons of information collecting, comparing and sorting, summary of the victim's personal information and privacy and other content focused issue in Internet users on the "human flesh search" page. There is a Internet users, is the illegal use of victims of disclosure of personal information and privacy, the implementation of other tort, such as telephone harassment, personal attacks, violation of property, etc. Nettie’s, we think, the irrational expression and the abuse of network freedom of speech is the main reason for the "human flesh search". In addition, the majority of Internet users actually belong to the "cross type", and "enthusiasm" to participate in online abuse, privacy, while "tireless" in real-life harassment on the parties. Although there are real violence is not in network, but overall, netizens online infringement, also extends to the real life directly. So we must to netizens in the network space and corresponding regulation behavior in real life, to stop the infringement occurred.Finally, network management is between the publisher and disseminator of intermediary platform provider, on the one hand, it is not before the user articles to read, modify, or delete, but it can in the user will be uploaded and published by the system automatically, its content can be abridged, amended, or even completely delete to prevent from there continue to spread, in order to prevent the injury consequence expands, and not for profit purpose, violated its own obligation to review. On the other hand, because of lack of ZeRenHua network anonymous propagation characteristics, make "searcher" forget the real life of legal responsibility, this is actually a misunderstanding and abuse of network virtual property. As soon as possible, therefore, we should also establish network identity authentication system, network news system, strengthen the supervision of online comments, reduce the emergence of the Internet mob, realize the violators of the criminal law.(2) must strengthen the legislation of right of privacy protection"Human flesh search" is related to the object of infringement, the most main is the privacy of the parties. But at present our country constitution, criminal law, procedure law and administrative laws and regulations are made rules to protect privacy. Current civil law, however, there is no direct provision of privacy protection, just in the 101th regulation: "citizens and legal persons shall enjoy reputation, only the personal dignity of citizens of protected by law, and banned with insult, libel and otherwise damage the reputation of citizens and legal persons." But caused by "human flesh search" privacy breaches, apply for the settlement of reputation tort law nature is inappropriate.conclusionIn contemporary society public opinion is a good moral character and integrity maintenance and purification of powerful weapons. If somebody's behavior is out of line, often with social public opinion, strong criticism and condemnation. "Human flesh search" as a "network of public opinion" in maintaining social public opinion, is good. We can take advantage of the "human flesh search" exert its social function of public opinion, but at the same time, it must be to spec with the help of a network of malicious rumors, slander, exposure privacy as well as some irrational behavior. Network space is also calling for rational, this behavior is not only belongs to morality itself, therefore, gradually involved in the "human flesh search" infringement of citizens' legitimate interests, we must strengthen legislation regulating them, at the same time, improve the quality of netizens. Anyway, regardless of how the development of Internet technology, it is still a double-edged sword, both benefit for us, and come back to hurt us, the key lies in how we use it.人肉搜索”当前热议问题探究摘要:近年来,在互联网领域出现的“人肉搜索”现象,已经受到人们越来越多的关注。
人肉搜索利大于弊立论稿
人肉搜索利大于弊立论稿在当今信息高度发达的时代,“人肉搜索”这一现象引起了广泛的关注和讨论。
对于人肉搜索,社会上存在着诸多不同的声音,有人认为其侵犯了个人隐私,带来了诸多负面影响;而我认为,人肉搜索利大于弊。
首先,我们需要明确人肉搜索的定义。
人肉搜索是指通过大量人工参与来寻找问题答案的网络搜索方式。
在某些情况下,它能够帮助受害者伸张正义。
比如说,在一些恶性犯罪案件中,警方的力量可能有限,而通过广大网民的积极参与,提供线索,能够加快案件的侦破速度。
许多犯罪分子在网民们的“火眼金睛”下无处遁形,最终被绳之以法。
这种情况下,人肉搜索成为了打击犯罪的有力武器,为受害者讨回公道,维护了社会的公平正义。
其次,人肉搜索还能够起到监督和约束不良行为的作用。
在网络时代,一些人可能会因为缺乏道德约束而做出不良行为,比如某些公职人员的贪污腐败、某些企业的违法违规操作等。
当这些行为被曝光后,网民们通过人肉搜索,深挖背后的真相和细节,让这些不良行为无处藏身。
这不仅对当事人起到了警示作用,也对其他有类似想法的人形成了一种威慑,从而有助于营造一个更加公平、公正、透明的社会环境。
再者,人肉搜索在一定程度上能够促进信息的传播和共享。
在一些紧急事件中,比如寻找失踪的儿童、老人,或者是在自然灾害发生时寻找急需帮助的人,人肉搜索可以迅速汇集大量的信息,提高寻找的效率。
而且,对于一些社会热点问题,通过人肉搜索,可以让更多的人了解到事情的真相和全貌,促进公众的参与和讨论,推动问题的解决。
当然,有人可能会说,人肉搜索容易侵犯个人隐私。
但我们应该看到,这并不是人肉搜索本身的问题,而是部分使用者在使用过程中的不当行为。
我们不能因为个别人的错误使用,就否定人肉搜索的积极作用。
为了使人肉搜索更好地发挥其积极作用,避免对个人隐私的侵犯,我们可以从以下几个方面进行规范和引导:一是加强法律监管,明确人肉搜索的合法边界和使用规范,对于违法使用人肉搜索的行为进行严厉打击。
人们对于人肉搜索的看法不一英语作文
人们对于人肉搜索的看法不一英语作文English: People have mixed opinions on human flesh search, also known as online vigilante justice. Some individuals believe that it is an effective way to hold wrongdoers accountable for their actions, especially in cases where the law may not be able to provide justice. They argue that it can help expose wrongdoings, generate public awareness, and prevent future misconduct. On the other hand, many people condemn human flesh search for its potential to encourage cyberbullying, invasion of privacy, and spreading misinformation. They believe that it can lead to malicious attacks, doxxing, and harm to innocent individuals. It is crucial to consider the ethical implications and potential consequences of participating in such activities, as it blurs the lines between justice and vigilantism.中文翻译: 人们对于人肉搜索,也称为网络私刑,持有不同看法。
人肉搜索辩论资料(中英)
定义——A "human flesh search" usually means that thousands of individual netizens piece togetherevery detail of a persons life and then publish them online.“人肉搜索”究竟是伸张正义还是网络暴力?Is “human flesh search”a Way of Justice or a Sort of Online Violence?顾名思义,人肉搜索就是利用现代信息科技,变传统的网络信息搜索为人找人,人问人,人碰人,人挤人,人挨人的关系型网络社区活动,变枯燥乏味的查询过程为一人提问、八方回应,一石激起千层浪,一声呼唤惊醒万颗真心的全新人性化搜索体验。
人肉搜索不仅可以在最短时间内揭露某某门背后的真相,为某三某七找到大众认可的道德定位,还可以在网络无法触及的地方,探寻并发现最美丽的丛林少女,最感人的高山牧民,最神秘的荒漠洞窟,最浪漫的终极邂逅…Just as the name implies, Cyber Manhunt (CM short for Cyber Manhunt) means to establish a person-to-person network community to search what people want based on modern information technology; in other words, it is a brand-new humanized searching experience by means of continuous asking and replying wi th all involved netizens’ heart and soul. It can not only expose the truth behind XXX scandal in shortest time, set an acceptable moral standard for a certain case, but also beyond network’s reach, discover lots of miracles(the most beautiful jungle girl, the most touchable alpine herdsman, the most magical desert cavern, or the most romantic love encounter… )因此,另一种说法应运而生:如果再没有相关的制度规范加以指导和约束,“人肉搜索”这面本为伸张正义的浩浩大旗将最终沦为一种网络暴力的负面代言。
英语口语话题:关于人肉搜索
以下是整理的《英语⼝语话题:关于⼈⾁搜索》,希望⼤家喜欢!Human flesh search: the "Vigilante of Chinese Internet".⼈⾁搜索:互联的义务警员。
In my opinion, the "human fresh search" is the online vigilante(义务警员). With convenience of the Internet, the righteous(正直的) people take matters into their own hands and seek justice on the Internet. More and more people who be have irrelevantly(不恰当的) or commit crimes are found and punished by public. As a result, human flesh search is helpful in keeping justice online.我认为,"⼈⾁搜索"在络中起着"络义警"的作⽤。
随着络的越发便利,⼀些正义之⼠主动承担此任,⾃发地在上寻找正义。
所以,越来越多的不法犯罪⾏为被搜索到并曝光于⼤庭⼴众之下,受到了应有的制裁。
因此,"⼈⾁搜索"有助于维护络上的正义。
Human flesh search: a kind of "Internet Iynching".⼈⾁搜索:互联的络私刑。
I think human flesh search is a kind of Internet lynching(私刑). Privacy is the basic right for everyone, even for the criminal. Therefore, the action of cyber violence and privacy violation(侵害) should not be encouraged by the public.我认为"⼈⾁搜索"是⼀种"络私刑"。
人肉搜索利弊英语作文
人肉搜索利弊英语作文英文回答:As for the pros and cons of human flesh search, there are a few different aspects to consider. On one hand, human flesh search can be a powerful tool for uncovering thetruth and holding people accountable for their actions. For example, if someone is caught on camera committing a crime, the internet community can come together to identify the perpetrator and bring them to justice. This kind of collective action can be a force for good in society, helping to ensure that wrongdoers are held responsible for their actions.On the other hand, human flesh search can also have some serious downsides. For one, it can lead to a dangerous form of mob justice, where people are targeted and harassed based on false information or misunderstandings. This can have serious consequences for the individuals involved, leading to online bullying, doxxing, and even physical harm.In addition, human flesh search can also lead to the spread of misinformation and rumors, as people rush to judgment without all the facts.Overall, I believe that human flesh search can be a double-edged sword. While it has the potential to uncover the truth and hold people accountable, it also has the potential to cause harm and spread misinformation. It's important for people to approach human flesh search with caution and skepticism, and to be mindful of the potential consequences of their actions.中文回答:对于人肉搜索的利弊,有一些不同的方面需要考虑。
关于人肉搜索看法的英语作文
关于人肉搜索看法的英语作文英文回答:As for my opinion on human flesh search, I believe that it can be a powerful tool for holding individuals accountable for their actions, but it can also be dangerous and lead to privacy violations and harassment.On one hand, human flesh search has been used to expose wrongdoing and bring justice to those who have committed crimes or unethical behavior. For example, in the case of the "Dancing Auntie" in China, a video of a woman dancingin public went viral and led to a massive online manhunt to identify her. It was later revealed that she was a government official who had been using her position for personal gain, and she was subsequently fired.However, on the other hand, human flesh search can quickly spiral out of control and result in innocent individuals being targeted and harassed. For instance, inthe case of the "Boston Marathon Bombing," Reddit users wrongly identified a missing student as one of the suspects, leading to him being bombarded with hateful messages and threats. This kind of online vigilantism can have serious consequences and can ruin people's lives.In conclusion, while human flesh search can sometimesbe used for good, it is important to approach it with caution and to consider the potential consequences of exposing individuals online. Privacy and safety should always be a top priority, and individuals should thinktwice before participating in these online investigations.中文回答:对于人肉搜索,我认为它可以是一个强大的工具,可以让个人对其行为负责,但也可能会带来危险,导致侵犯隐私和骚扰。
英语考试作文-专八作文范文:对网络人肉搜索的看法
英语考试作文专八作文范文:对网络人肉搜索的看法专八作文范文:对网络人肉搜索的看法专八考试中考生们最为重视的就是专八作文,专八作文不仅需要考生对词汇及语法的熟悉运用更是对考生思维拓展的一项考察,新东方在线专八频道整理了一系列专八作文范文供考生们参考练习。
Humanpowered search,or Renrou Sousuo, has gained its popularity近些年人肉搜索受到了人们的广泛关注among Netizens in recent years.特别是在网友中。
With Netizens participating in search,网友也会参与到搜索之中human-powered search becomes an efficient tool to find desired information.人肉搜索已经成为了寻找信息的有效手段。
In 2006, a Netizen uploaded a picture showing 20062006年一位网友上传了一幅照片that a beautiful woman was maltreating a delicate kitty.照片显示的是一位美女正在虐待一只小猫。
The maltreatment was so intolerable这样的虐待让人忍无可忍that Netizens decided to find out the culprit.网友决定寻找真凶。
Six days later,an anonymous Netizen submitted a post六天以后一位没留下姓名的网友上传了一个帖子describing that the wanted woman lived in a town in a northern province帖子上说这个美女住在北部省份的城镇and other detailed information.还揭露了一些细节消息。
人们对于人肉搜索的看法不一英语作文
人们对于人肉搜索的看法不一英语作文Title: The Controversy of Human Flesh Search EnginesThe phenomenon of "human flesh search engines" has sparked intense debate and diverse opinions among people. These online platforms, which allow users to search for personal information about individuals based on their real names, have raised significant concerns regarding privacy and ethics.On one hand, some argue that human flesh search engines can serve as a tool for social justice. They claim that these platforms can help to expose fraudsters, hold people accountable for their actions, and even assist in finding missing persons. Proponents believe that by empowering the public to uncover truths, these search engines contribute to a transparent society where wrongdoers are brought to light.However, others vehemently oppose the existence of human flesh search engines, citing serious violations of privacy and the potential for cyberbullying. Critics argue that these platforms encourage a form of digital vigilantism, where individuals may be subjected to unwanted scrutiny and harassment based on unverified or misleading information.Furthermore, the release of personal information without consent can lead to dangerous situations, including stalking and other forms of harm.In addition, the accuracy and reliability of information found on human flesh search engines are often questioned. The spread of false information can not only tarnish an individual's reputation but also result in legal consequences without a proper fact-checking mechanism in place.From a legal standpoint, the operation of human flesh search engines is a grey area in many jurisdictions. While some countries have implemented laws to regulate these practices, others are still grappling with how to balance the right to privacy with the freedom of information.In conclusion, the controversy surrounding human flesh search engines highlights the complex interplay between technology, ethics, and privacy. As society continues to navigate the digital age, it is crucial to establish clear boundaries and regulations that protect individuals from potential harm while promoting fair and responsible use of information. The ongoing dialogue about the role of these platforms in our lives underscores the importance of thoughtfulconsideration and collective responsibility in the realm of online interactions.。
人肉搜索是不正义的英语作文
人肉搜索是不正义的英语作文The Unjust Nature of Human Flesh Search.In today's digital age, the concept of "human flesh search" has gained increasing prominence, often taking center stage in heated debates regarding privacy, ethics, and justice. This practice, which involves the concerted effort of online users to locate and disclose personal information about an individual, often without their consent, is deeply problematic and deserves a thorough examination of its unjust nature.To understand why human flesh search is unjust, one must first consider the fundamental right to privacy. Privacy is a cornerstone of human dignity and autonomy, allowing individuals to control the disclosure of information about themselves. It is essential for the maintenance of personal relationships, as well as for one's psychological and emotional well-being. Human flesh search violates this right by exposing sensitive informationwithout the individual's permission, thus infringing on their privacy.Furthermore, human flesh search often leads to the dissemination of inaccurate or incomplete information. In the haste to uncover details about an individual, online users may overlook the importance of verifying facts and sources. This can result in the spread of misinformation, which can damage an individual's reputation and even impact their livelihood. The unjust nature of human.。
网友利弊英文作文
网友利弊英文作文Being an internet user has its pros and cons. On the one hand, the internet provides us with a wealth of information at our fingertips. We can learn new things, stay updated on current events, and connect with people from all over the world.However, the internet can also be a breeding ground for misinformation. It's easy for false information to spread like wildfire, and it can be difficult to discern what is true and what is not. This can lead to confusion and misunderstandings, and even have real-world consequences.Another advantage of being an internet user is the ability to connect with others. Social media and messaging apps allow us to stay in touch with friends and family, no matter where they are. We can also meet new people who share our interests and hobbies, forming communities and support networks.On the flip side, spending too much time on theinternet can lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness. It's easy to get caught up in the virtual world and neglect our real-life relationships. This can have a negative impact on our mental and emotional well-being.The internet also provides us with countless entertainment options. We can stream movies and TV shows, listen to music, play games, and more. This can be a great way to relax and unwind, especially after a long day.However, excessive screen time can have adverse effects on our physical health. It can lead to eye strain, headaches, and disrupted sleep patterns. It's important to strike a balance and not let our online activitiesinterfere with our overall health and well-being.In conclusion, being an internet user has its advantages and disadvantages. It's up to us to use the internet responsibly and in moderation, making the most of its benefits while being mindful of its drawbacks.。
人肉搜索 英语作文
人肉搜索英语作文Title: The Ethical Dilemma of Human Flesh Searching。
In recent years, the phenomenon of "human flesh searching" has garnered significant attention, particularly in the realm of online discourse and social media. This practice involves individuals collectively investigating and revealing personal information about others, often with the intention of exposing wrongdoing or seeking justice. While it can be argued that human flesh searching serves as a tool for accountability and transparency, its ethical implications are complex and multifaceted.One of the primary ethical concerns surrounding human flesh searching is the invasion of privacy. The individuals targeted by these searches often have their personal information, such as addresses, phone numbers, and employment details, exposed to the public without their consent. This invasion of privacy can have severe consequences, including harassment, defamation, and evenphysical harm. In the digital age, where personal data is increasingly vulnerable to exploitation, the ethical imperative to respect privacy rights is more critical than ever.Furthermore, human flesh searching can lead to the spread of misinformation and vigilantism. In the absence of proper verification processes and fact-checking mechanisms, the information uncovered through these searches may be inaccurate or incomplete. This misinformation can fuel online witch hunts and mob mentality, resulting in innocent individuals being unfairly targeted and subjected to online harassment. Moreover, the anonymity afforded by online platforms can embolden individuals to engage in behavior they would not condone in offline settings, further exacerbating the potential for harm.Another ethical dilemma inherent in human flesh searching is the lack of accountability and due process. Unlike traditional forms of investigative journalism or law enforcement, which are subject to ethical standards and legal oversight, human flesh searching operates outside ofestablished regulatory frameworks. As a result, there are few safeguards in place to prevent abuse or ensure fairness in the pursuit of justice. Without proper accountability mechanisms, there is a risk that human flesh searching may devolve into a form of digital vigilantism, where individuals take justice into their own hands without regard for the rule of law or the rights of the accused.Despite these ethical concerns, proponents of human flesh searching argue that it can be a powerful tool for holding powerful individuals and institutions accountable. In cases where traditional channels of justice have failed or been inaccessible, human flesh searching can empower ordinary citizens to seek redress for grievances and expose corruption or wrongdoing. Additionally, by shining a light on issues that may otherwise remain hidden, human flesh searching can facilitate public discourse and catalyze social change.However, it is essential to recognize that the ends do not always justify the means. While the goals of accountability and justice are laudable, they must bepursued in a manner that upholds fundamental ethical principles, including respect for privacy, adherence to due process, and the avoidance of harm. Rather than resorting to vigilante tactics, individuals and communities should work to strengthen existing institutions and mechanisms for accountability, such as independent journalism, legal advocacy, and grassroots activism.In conclusion, the practice of human flesh searching presents a profound ethical dilemma in the digital age. While it has the potential to serve as a tool for accountability and transparency, it also raises serious concerns about privacy rights, misinformation, vigilantism, and due process. As we navigate the complexities of the online world, it is imperative that we uphold ethical principles and values that respect the dignity and rights of all individuals, both online and offline. Only by doing so can we ensure that justice is pursued in a fair, transparent, and responsible manner.。
人肉搜索利大于弊立论稿
谢谢主席!各位评委、观众、对方辩友:大家好!现如今,有这样一种人性化的网络搜索体验:一人发问、八方搜索,一人发帖、众人回应,网友们把它生动地称为“人肉搜索”。
随着时代发展,民众人肉搜索的关注点逐渐由娱乐八卦转入社会民生,尤其是今天反腐的问题上。
在我方看来,之所以提倡人肉搜索,是因为在当今反腐工作中,人肉搜索起到了不可替代的作用。
首先,人肉搜索本身提高反腐的效力。
相较于传统反腐形式,人肉搜索群策群力,取证范围更广,能够更高效地搜集贪腐信息。
“五毒书记”张二江被多次举报存在不检行为,但是由于证据不足,从检举到定罪长达五年之久。
而人肉搜索,使深圳贪官林嘉祥从不为人知到获得足以定罪的信息,仅用25个小时,连美国《洛杉矶时报》都称“中国人肉搜索让国际刑警黯然失色。
”与此同时,人肉搜索更重视细节,大大增加腐败现象被发现的可能性,一块名表让杨达才从身居高位转眼身败名裂,如此迅雷之势,对官员形成巨大威慑,警示他们“毋以恶小而为之”,对反腐败起到防微杜渐的作用。
第二,人肉搜索为公民反腐提供了切实途径。
如今“反腐败”之所以备受关注,正是因为它涉及了广大民众的切身利益。
而人肉搜索有效利用互联网的广泛性与高效性,使网民聚合为一,成为社会中的新力量。
这种真正实现全民参与的反腐途径,不仅使民众对贪官追查和处理的始末有了全方位的了解,真正保障了公民的知情权,更切实维护了民众的监督权,打破了“官官相护”的弊病,改变了“政治参与无门”的现状,推动了“网络监督”的社会新风。
或许,人肉搜索作为网民群体的自发行动,其实施过程和最终结果常有不尽如人意的地方,这点我方并不否认。
但我们看到,娱乐猎奇的比例逐年降低,惩治贪腐等严肃议题成为主流;网络公约不断涌现,网络暴力等恶性行为得到规范,人肉搜索正在走向正轨。
所有这些,都该让我们对人肉搜索的未来抱有期待。
大众反腐的崛起,为中国公民意识的培育提供了一个契机,让惯于缄默与忍受的百姓,在这个政治参与渠道匮乏的社会中,可以发出自己的声音,以匹夫之责担天下兴亡之任,重塑社会公正。
许多媒体都热衷于揭露名人的隐私英语作文
许多媒体都热衷于揭露名人的隐私英语作文Many Media Outlets Eager to Expose Celebrities' PrivacyHi there! My name is Emma and I'm 10 years old. Today I want to talk to you about something that really bugs me - how many newspapers, TV shows, websites, and other media outlets are always trying to pry into celebrities' personal lives and reveal their secrets.I think it's really wrong and an invasion of privacy. Celebrities are people too, just like you and me. Sure, they're famous and make a lot of money from acting, singing, playing sports or whatever they do. But that doesn't mean they've given up their right to have a private life away from the cameras and reporters.It seems like anytime a celebrity goes out to dinner, goes on vacation, or even just walks down the street, there are photographers following them and sticking cameras in their faces. The paparazzi, as they're called, are basically stalkers with cameras! They lurk around waiting to catch celebrities in embarrassing situations or doing something they can make seem scandalous in order to get juicy photos to sell to the gossip magazines and websites.And speaking of gossip mags, they are the worst when it comes to invading celebs' privacy. Their whole business is built on digging up rumours and printing made-up stories about who is dating who, who is fighting with their spouse or having a "nip tuck." They say the most horrible things about people's personal lives and relationships, and I'm sure at least some of it isn't even true!I remember a few years ago, there were all these stories about some famous singer being pregnant based on some photos of her having a little belly pouch. But then it turned out she wasn't pregnant at all - the poor woman was just having a bloated day! Can you imagine how embarrassed and upset she must have felt to have that personal detail blasted all over the internet and tabloids? I would be absolutely mortified.What's even worse is when the media pries into celebrities' children's lives. The kids of famous people absolutely deserve privacy and a normal childhood. But you see these gossip outlets printing photos of celebrity babies and toddlers that were clearly taken by sneaky paparazzi using long lenses. And they'll analyze and criticize how the kids look or what they're wearing. How awful is that? Leave the poor kids alone!And don't even get me started on how the media delves into stars' medical issues, mental health problems, addictions, and tragedies like deaths in the family. Those are such personal, private things that are no one's business but the person who is going through it. Printing that stuff in newspapers and all over the internet for millions to see and make fun of is so unethical and cruel.I know that some celebrities probably crave attention and intentionally share about their private lives on social media for publicity. But even then, they should be able to draw the line and have control over what is public and what is private. Once something is out there, the gossip outlets take it and run wild with it, often twisting the facts or making things seem way more dramatic than they really are.At the end of the day, celebrities are human beings and they have the same rights to privacy as anyone else. Just because they are rich and famous doesn't mean they signed away their dignity and personal lives for public consumption and ridicule. There has to be some boundaries and restraint from the media when it comes to exposing people's secrets and sharing things that are none of our business.What really bothers me most is that there is such a huge appetite and market for this kind of privacy-invading,rumor-filled gossip. That's why the media keeps doing it - because people keep reading it, watching it, and clicking on it. It makes me sad that so many people are willing to be voyeurs into others' personal lives and mistakes just for entertainment. We should respect people's privacy and human dignity more.If I was a celebrity, I would try my best to stay out of the public eye as much as possible, only share what I wanted to share online, and spend time with my family and friends in private places away from the paparazzi and gossip reporters. A small sacrifice of fame and publicity seems worth it to me in order to keep my personal life truly personal.I hope that in the future, the media and the public will have more respect for celebrities as human beings who need and deserve some privacy in their lives, just like the rest of us. Selling magazines or getting clicks is not a good enough reason to totally invade someone's personal space or share details about their private struggles, relationships, and family lives. We all deserve to have boundaries and to decide what we want to keep for ourselves. Famous or not, we're all people first.Those are just my thoughts as a 10-year-old kid who gets annoyed at how the entertainment media seems to have no shame when it comes to exposing celebrities' secrets for profit. Maybe I'll feel differently when I'm older, but for now, I think we could all use a little more respect for privacy and personal boundaries. What do you think? Let me know!。
人肉搜索的利与弊的英语演讲稿
人肉搜索的利与弊的英语演讲稿21世纪杯全国中学生英语演讲比赛复赛即兴演讲“21世纪杯”全国英语演讲大赛云南赛区暨东盟南亚国际文化交流大使选拔赛《竞赛内容及评分标准》(一)外语类演讲/讲故事比赛小学组(低段1-3年级)初赛(笔试45分钟)、复赛(时间5分钟)、决赛(时间5分钟)【初赛】笔试:以中国、世界、东盟南亚、云南文化知识为主,85%的考试内容选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册,由组委会命题。
题型以看图选择、英汉连线、看图选词、看图填空为主,考试时间45分钟。
【复赛】自备题目演讲+评委提问(评委提问,一问针对选手自备题目,二问选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册)。
(1)自备题目演讲(3分钟)(2)评委提问(2分钟)【决赛】自备题目演讲+看图说话+评委提问(评委提问,一问针对选手自备题目,二问选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册)。
(1)自备题目演讲(2分钟)(2)看图说话(2分钟)(3)评委提问(1分钟)小学组(高段4-6年级)初赛(笔试45分钟)、复赛(时间5分钟)、决赛(时间5分钟)【初赛】笔试:以中国、世界、东盟南亚、云南文化知识为主,85%的考试内容选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册,由组委会命题。
题型以看图填空、选择、判断为主,考试时间45分钟。
1 / 7【复赛】自备题目演讲+评委提问(评委提问,一问针对选手自备题目,二问选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册)。
(1)自备题目演讲(3分钟)(2)评委提问(2分钟)【决赛】自备题目演讲+即兴演讲+评委提问(评委提问,一问针对选手自备题目,二问选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册)。
(1)自备题目演讲(2分钟)(2)即兴演讲(2分钟)(3)评委提问(1分钟)初中组、高中组初赛(笔试45分钟)、复赛(时间5分钟)、决赛(时间5分钟)【初赛】笔试:以中国、世界、东盟南亚、云南文化知识为主,85%的考试内容选自《东南亚南亚文化交流大使》竞赛手册,由组委会命题。
关于人肉搜索看法的英语作文
关于人肉搜索看法的英语作文英文回答:The advent of the internet has brought about unprecedented connectivity and access to information. This has had a profound impact on various aspects of our lives, including our ability to gather and share information about others. One phenomenon that has emerged in this digital age is "doxing," also known as "human flesh search."Doxing, a term derived from the phrase "dropping documents," refers to the practice of publicly sharing personal information about an individual without their consent. This information can include names, addresses, phone numbers, financial details, and even sensitive data such as medical records or social security numbers. Doxing is often carried out for malicious purposes, such as harassment, intimidation, or revenge.The ethical implications of doxing are highlycontentious. Supporters of doxing argue that it can be a legitimate tool for exposing wrongdoing, holdingindividuals accountable for their actions, and unmasking online trolls who remain anonymous. They point to instances where doxing has been used to bring criminals to justice, identify sex offenders, and expose corruption.However, critics of doxing argue that it is a dangerous and harmful practice that violates an individual's privacy and right to safety. They contend that public disclosure of personal information can lead to stalking, cyberbullying, and even physical harm. They also argue that doxing canhave a chilling effect on freedom of expression and dissent, as individuals may be hesitant to express their opinions or engage in activism for fear of being targeted.The legal landscape surrounding doxing varies across jurisdictions. In some countries, it is illegal to share personal information without an individual's consent, while in others there are limited legal protections against doxing. This inconsistency can make it difficult to hold doxers accountable for their actions.To address the ethical challenges posed by doxing, it is imperative to strike a balance between protecting individuals' privacy and ensuring that information is available in the public interest. One approach is to develop clear legal frameworks that define the limits of doxing and provide robust protections for individuals. Another is to promote ethical guidelines and norms among individuals and organizations that use the internet. Additionally, educational campaigns can be implemented to raise awareness of the potential harms of doxing and empower individuals to protect their personal information online.中文回答:人肉搜索,又称网络暴力,是指未经他人同意公开分享其个人信息的网络行为。
人肉搜索利弊英语作文
人肉搜索利弊英语作文The Pros and Cons of Human-Powered Searching。
In the digital age, information is widely accessible with a click or a tap. Among various methods of information gathering, human-powered searching, commonly known as "human flesh search," has both its advantages and disadvantages.Firstly, one significant advantage of human-powered searching lies in its ability to uncover hard-to-find information. When traditional search engines fail todeliver relevant results due to various reasons like incomplete data or technical limitations, humanintervention can often fill in the gaps. Volunteers from online communities may actively participate in such searches, sharing their knowledge and resources to helpfind what's being looked for. This collaborative effort often leads to unexpected discoveries and solutions that would have remained undiscovered otherwise.Moreover, human-powered searching can serve as a powerful tool for social accountability and justice. In some cases, it has been used to expose fraud, corruption, or other malpractices that might not be easily detectable through official channels alone. By bringing attention to these issues through widespread participation and discussion, human flesh search can pressure authoritiesinto taking necessary actions and reforms.However, despite its potential benefits, human-powered searching also comes with several notable drawbacks. One major concern is privacy invasion. Often, the line between legitimate investigation and unethical tracking becomes blurred when personal details of individuals are exposed without their consent. This can lead to harassment, stalking, and even identity theft in extreme cases. Therefore, it's crucial to exercise caution and respect for privacy rights when engaging in such activities.Another downside is the potential for misinformation and bias. Since human-powered searches rely on individualcontributions and interpretations, there's always a risk of inaccurate or biased information being shared and spread widely. This can mislead people and create unnecessary panic or chaos if not carefully managed. To mitigate this issue, it's essential to verify sources thoroughly before sharing them widely and encourage critical thinking among participants.Overall, while human-powered searching offers certain advantages in terms of information discovery and social accountability, it must be approached with caution and responsibility. It's important to recognize its limitations and potential risks while seeking to maximize its positive impact on society. By striking a balance between privacy protection and open dialogue, we can ensure that this form of information gathering continues to serve us well in an increasingly connected world.。
人肉搜索的利与弊的英语演讲稿
人肉搜索的利与弊的英语演讲稿第一篇:人肉搜索的利与弊的英语演讲稿谢谢主席,大家晚上好!今天我方观点是:人肉搜索弊大于利。
人肉搜索,是一种以互联网为媒介,以人工方式对搜索引擎所提供的信息逐个辨别真伪,或通过匿名知情人提供数据,以查找人物和事件真相的群体运动。
显而易见,网络只是一种工具,而以互联网为媒介的人肉搜索却离不开人的参与。
我方认为,人肉搜索弊大于利,理由有三。
第一,人肉搜索因为脱离不了人的参与,其过程的侵权性与结果的不确定性是固有存在的。
其侵权性体现在对人肉对象的人身攻击、名誉权,隐私权侵害三个方面。
其次,由于参与群体的价值观各有不同,其对事件行为的看法就有了其主观性与片面性。
而且群体的活动易使人民大众自认为正义的道德谴责脱离理性的轨道,最终对人肉对象造成的摧毁远远超出了这个事件的本身。
最重要的是,人肉搜索本身就是因现阶段公权力监督缺失所衍生出存在巨大弊端的替代品,所以我们所做的应是去强化各部门职能,而不是加强对人肉搜索中产生的问题的完善与监督,因为本质问题是无法解决的。
第二,引发人肉搜索的话题是由其引导人决定的,易遭他人利用,无法达到维护社会的目的。
群体狂热起来是是不具备理性的,思想情感易受旁人暗示,甚至失去自控,肆无忌惮。
而恰恰是这点,极易遭到别有用心者的利用,去传播虚假不良信息,拉动舆论导向而达到个人目的。
比如恶毒后妈事件只是治不起病的人为了索要医药费而设计的炒作。
正如网络推手“立二拆四”所言:有热点的地方就有广告营销价值,很多企业都在追寻无边的网友们作为营销对象。
当进行人肉搜索的网民沦为被利用的工具之时,人肉搜索的价值何在?第三,不可否认,“人肉搜索”很多时候是一种无奈,网友们利用互联网的特性,自发进行“侦破”,目的是希望用社会道德评判去约束不道德行为。
可那成百上千的,被群众们谩骂,精神上遭受极端的痛苦,甚至因此结束了生命的无辜的受害者们,又该由谁对他们负责?所以人肉搜索本来就是一个缺乏理性的盲目且无法律约束的畸形维权途径,以“很黄很暴力”事件为例,被搜索者仅仅是个孩子,她的世界观、人生观尚未成熟,仅仅是因为某些话说得不够得体,就沦为“人肉搜索”对象,遭遇了肆意的攻击、侮辱,这时我们还能不能说“人肉搜索”是在伸张正义呢?更多时候它反而像把乱箭,刺痛了的多是那些无辜的受害者!眼下,受到网络“人肉搜索”伤害的当事人不仅难以讨回公道,提供“人肉搜索”的网站往往还敷衍塞责。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
谢谢主席,大家晚上好!今天我方观点是:人肉搜索弊大于利。
人肉搜索,是一种以互联网为媒介,以人工方式对搜索引擎所提供的信息逐个辨别真伪,或通过匿名知情人提供数据,以查找人物和事件真相的群体运动。
显而易见,网络只是一种工具,而以互联网为媒介的人肉搜索却离不开人的参与。
我方认为,人肉搜索弊大于利,理由有三。
第一,人肉搜索因为脱离不了人的参与,其过程的侵权性与结果的不确定性是固有存在的。
其侵权性体现在对人肉对象的人身攻击、名誉权,隐私权侵害三个方面。
其次,由于参与群体的价值观各有不同,其对事件行为的看法就有了其主观性与片面性。
而且群体的活动易使人民大众自认为正义的道德谴责脱离理性的轨道,最终对人肉对象造成的摧毁远远超出了这个事件的本身。
最重要的是,人肉搜索本身就是因现阶段公权力监督缺失所衍生出存在巨大弊端的替代品,所以我们所做的应是去强化各部门职能,而不是加强对人肉搜索中产生的问题的完善与监督,因为本质问题是无法解决的。
第二,引发人肉搜索的话题是由其引导人决定的,易遭他人利用,无法达到维护社会的目的。
群体狂热起来是是不具备理性的,思想情感易受旁人暗示,甚至失去自控,肆无忌惮。
而恰恰是这点,极易遭到别有用心者的利用,去传播虚假不良信息,拉动舆论导向而达到个人目的。
比如恶毒后妈事件只是治不起病的人为了索要医药费而设计的炒作。
正如网络推手“立二拆四”所言:有热点的地方就有广告营销价值,很多企业都在追寻无边的网友们作为营销对象。
当进行人肉搜索的网民沦为被利用的工具之时,人肉搜索的价值何在?第三,不可否认,“人肉搜索”很多时候是一种无奈,网友们利用互联网的特性,自发进行“侦破”,目的是希望用社会道德评判去约束不道德行为。
可那成百上千的,被群众们谩骂,精神上遭受极端的痛苦,甚至因此结束了生命的无辜的受害者们,又该由谁对他们负责?所以人肉搜索本来就是一个缺乏理性的盲目且无法律约束的畸形维权途径,以“很黄很暴力”事件为例,被搜索者仅仅是个孩子,她的世界观、人生观尚未成熟,仅仅是因为某些话说得不够得体,就沦为“人肉搜索”对象,遭遇了肆意的攻击、侮辱,这时我们还能不能说“人肉搜索”是在伸张正义呢?更多时候它反而像把乱箭,刺痛了的多是那些无辜的受害者!眼下,受到网络“人肉搜索”伤害的当事人不仅难以讨回公道,提供“人肉搜索”的网站往往还敷衍塞责。
可能我们因为今天在网上发表了一个观点,然后就被一大群反对者人肉,我们以后还敢不敢再毫无顾虑的畅所欲言?恐怕我们的安全感早已消失,言论自由不再自由吧!篇二:人肉搜索的利与弊人肉搜索的利与弊2008年中国青年报社会调查中心在对2491名公众的一项调查显示,近五成公众认为人肉搜索是不是网络暴力要“视情况而定”,近八成被调查者认为应该更好地规范人肉搜索引擎。
各种调查数据表明“人肉搜索”被简单粗暴的“禁止”并不能为大多数网民所接受,正如陈力丹所说,“人肉搜索”本身没有“原罪”,如何在实际过程中趋利避害,使“人肉搜索”能够真正地、有效且有益地发挥其信息收集与传播的强大功能,正是我们所要探讨的。
人肉搜索引擎本质上就是一种信息的搜索机制。
根据提问的线索,由人工参与解答。
而网络传播的广泛与迅速,赋予了这种解答前所未有的高效。
同时,它“变传统的网络信息搜索为人找人、人问人、人碰人、人挤人、人挨人的关系型网络社区的活动。
它变枯燥乏味的查询过程为一人提问、八方回应,一石激起千层浪,一声呼唤惊醒万颗真心的人性化搜索体验”,使人肉搜索体现出了巨大的威力。
“人肉搜索”就是一个获得信息的工具。
工具本身没有好坏之分。
是“利”从这个角度来看,是“弊”,关键在于人的发展历程,2001年的“微软陈自瑶事件”,2006年的“虐猫事件”、“铜须门事件”,2007年底的“华南虎事件”、“张殊凡事件”,2008年的深圳市海事局党委书记林嘉祥“猥亵门”事件和南京江宁区房产管理局局长周久耕的“天价烟”事件,2009年杭州“富家子飙车撞人事件”,2011年的“药八刀事件”。
这许多的“人肉搜索”案例都具有一个共同特点,那就是反映了当今社会人们普遍关心的某种“公共议题”。
而这些“公共议题”大致涉及到以下方面:一是对某些既得利益者的揭发与监督,某些官员的道德败坏、贪污腐败迅速激起了网友的集体愤怒,这种网络舆论的力量,甚至对事情的走向起到了决定性的意义。
因此,“人肉搜索”这种草根监督的模式,不失为党内监督、民主监督、传统媒体监督之后的有效补充。
二是对社会事件的道德批评。
例如婚外恋、第三者等违背社会道德的事情。
这些事件往往不是鼓励的,他们共同反映的是社会当今的乱象之一,即人们扭曲的、异化的价值观、道德观已经由此引发而来的“包二奶”、“婚外情”等等状况。
但这些明显违背社会道德、挑战普世价值观的行为,却往往由于现行法律法规的不完善,在现实生活中很难受到应有的惩罚。
而网友通过“人肉搜索”,对此类行为进行声讨与批评,初衷确是积极正面的,一定程度上弥补了相关法律法规的缺失。
从这些方面来看,“人肉搜索”无疑有其积极的一面,其初衷是以“弘扬真善美、贬斥假恶丑的秩序维护和构建为主”。
但“人肉搜索”也是一把双刃剑,它的主要弊端在于:对普通公民个人隐私权的侵犯;以及“人肉搜索”过程中体现出来的暴力倾向(尤其表现为语言的暴力)。
但这些弊端并不是无法克服。
就个人隐私权的保护而言,我国《刑法》、《民法》中虽有涉及,但不够明确具体,尚需具体化细致化。
例如“人肉搜索”的边界在哪里?“搜索”到何种程度会侵犯人的隐私权?如何处罚,怎样赔偿?倘若有法可依,自然可以理清“人肉搜索”的合法边界。
至于“人肉搜索”过程中体现出的暴力倾向,以及网友的不文明行为,则要依靠网友的充分自律来实现。
总的来说,关于“人肉搜索”的种种矛盾与争议,折射出的恰恰是当今社会民众的两大主要诉求:一方面,是公共领域的信息公开、信息透明亟待推进。
在公共权力的监督仍不充分的当下,“人肉搜索”尤其是“人肉搜索反腐”展现出的公众监督热情和力量,弥足珍贵。
另一方面是私人领域的个人隐私权亟待保护。
但这两方面的诉求本身并不矛盾,而是可以兼顾的。
当我们能够更为完善细致地建立法律法规,理清“人肉搜索”边界,使“人肉搜索”能够有法可依、有法必依,从而尽可能控制“人肉搜索”的消极因素,加强其积极作用,将公共领域的信息公开与私人领域隐私保护结合起来,我们是可以预期“人肉搜索”的光明未来的。
篇三:人肉搜索对社会发展利大于弊一辩发言稿正方一辩发言稿尊敬的各位评委老师,亲爱的同学们:大家晚上好!下面由我陈宝花代表我方做一辩陈词。
我方的观点是人肉搜索对于社会道德的影响利大于弊。
人肉搜索引擎之所以以“人肉”命名,是因为它与百度、google等利用机器搜索技术不同,它更多的利用人工参与来提纯搜索引擎提供的信息。
人肉搜索狭义上是在社会层面上寻找具体的人和线索。
广义的人肉搜索绝大部分时候是在不违反国家,社会,集体,个人利益以及不触犯现有法律的情况下默默地为广大地网民提供帮助,基本上都是通过求助、发问的方式获得很多网友的帮助和回答。
因此人肉搜索对于社会道德发展影响深远。
下面请听我为大家列举一下人肉搜索的具体好处。
虚假丑恶无处遁形,让社会正义得到弘扬,2.它网罗了民众,尤其是网络上的公众对于信息的渴求。
3.人肉搜索作为一种利用开放的、互动的、共享的网络平台,来获取信息的一种技术,从而大大满足了群众的知情权。
但它也有部分弊端,那就是较大程度的侵犯了他人隐私权。
4.人肉搜索这种“类民众监督”利大于弊。
从监督手段来看,“人肉搜索”确实是让公众公司、公众人物走向更透明、更多人监督的一个过程。
一线监管人员从中也能获取很多公司、个人违法违规的线索,有助于对公司、个人的具体沟通、调查以及了解监督。
官方监督与民众监督通过网络的信息反馈从而得到互动,不失为一种有效的共促监督方式。
5.一个人没办法,一群人还是有办法的。
人肉搜索充分发动了人际网络的力量,将互联网“互助、分享”的精神发扬光大,可以在最短时间内揭露一些事件背后的真相,维护社会道德秩序。
这样的方式能给更多出头的“坏鸟”有效打击,可以解决法律和道德都解决不了的事。
6.当法律不方便时,人肉搜索是最好的道德武器,有助于提高社会公德,维护操守;同时各地网友联动,全社会监督,使道德谴责可视。
7 “人肉搜索”有助于提高社会公德。
它能够让丑恶行径原形毕露。
在周正龙、周久耕等一系列事件中,“人肉搜索”起到了匡扶正义、惩恶扬善的作用。
8在进行“人肉搜索”时,应该大胆怀疑,小心求证,找到更确凿的证据,避免形成网络暴力,避免使用非法手段,而在法律框架内查出周久耕身上的问题,从而洗清以往人肉搜索在一些事件中留下的污名,改变公众对人肉搜索“网络暴力”的恐惧,树立一个以人肉搜索依法反腐的典范。
9.立足一中国目前的国情与实际,基于公众对于舆论监督与公共参与无力的担忧。
在未能建立有效的参与渠道,疏导公众对于公共领域的监督热情之前,这种“人肉搜索反腐”公众是值得深思和理解,展现的公众监督热情,自然同样弥足珍贵。
下面请听一下咱们网民对人肉搜索的评价:咱们网民有力量,一石能激千层浪。
道德底线莫逾越,否则天涯无处藏。
人肉搜搜转,三天逮回乡。
痛哭流涕晚,只恨当初犯。
1.“人肉搜索”作为一种工具,可以在最短时间内寻找到失去联系的亲朋好友,揭露某些事件的真相,让所以综上所述,我方认为人肉搜索对于社会道德的影响利大于弊。