雅思英语大作文范文100篇
雅思作文满分范文(5篇)

雅思作文满分范文(5篇)(经典版)编制人:__________________审核人:__________________审批人:__________________编制单位:__________________编制时间:____年____月____日序言下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文,如工作总结、工作计划、合同协议、条据文书、策划方案、句子大全、作文大全、诗词歌赋、教案资料、其他范文等等,想了解不同范文格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!Moreover, our store provides various types of classic sample essays for everyone, such as work summaries, work plans, contract agreements, doctrinal documents, planning plans, complete sentences, complete compositions, poems, songs, teaching materials, and other sample essays. If you want to learn about different sample formats and writing methods, please stay tuned!雅思作文满分范文(5篇)雅思作文满分范文第1篇下面给大家讲解一下小作文的心得和训练方法:小作文(A类)心得:为考的是A类,这里只说A类,留学生的话也建议考A类,平时写报告其实就是在练小作文,尤其是理工科。
雅思写作范文100篇(完整资料).doc

范文的思路好了。
这样好的东西,可惜不是我整理的,是一个叫landfish姑娘收集的,厉害!v105Some people claim that the disadvantages of the car are more than the advantages,do you ag ree or disagree?范文1The birth of cars has made an enormous change to our life. In the past, we travelled from one place to another only by foot, nowadays, cars can do the same job . It goes withou r saying that the invention of cars bring great benefits to all of us. but as an ancient prove rb goes, no garden without weeds. Car is no exception.Owing a car has a lot of advantages. For one thing, car provides us the most convenient wa y of transportation. we can get around freely without spenting a lot of time. Emotionally, I always found driving is so exciting. For another , it is comfortable to drive a car.in winte r.Drivers always can stay warm and dry even in rainy weather .In addition, drivers are saf er in their cars when they are out at night.While cars bring the human a large number of merits ,their side-effects gradually come t o the surface .Firstly, running a car needs a lot of oil,which is getting less and less.The incre asing number of cars contributes the lack of energy.Secondlly,as more and more cars are util zed,the traffic ecpecially in big cities is getting heaver and heavier,which leads to the seriou s traffic jam.Moreover,the inceasing numbers of cars ,which excaust sent a huge quantitie s of carbon monoxide into atmosphere.It makes the air of cities unbreathable, it strips peop le’s contact with fresh air.Therefore, the new energy should be explored to replace the oil so that our envionmental p ollution can be avioded , and the strick law should be issued to keep the numbers of cars un der control. Thus, our heavier traffic can be solved!范文2Private cars vs Public trafficAs traffic problems become more and more serious in both developed and developing coun tries, their governments have to try hard to fix it. Loads of money and energy have been sp ent to deal with this situation.Firstly, it is not efficient for the commuters to use their private cars to and back from their workplaces. Occasionally, we can see they have to sit on the wheels wasting time and fuel i n a heavy traffic jam. At the same time, through burning the fossil fuels, green house gas suc h as CO2, CO1, acid rain gas SO2, fumes and dusts are being released into the atmospher e, all of which heavily overload our environment. Thirdly, with the increase of private cars, t he road traffic accidents are also rise dramatically. For example, in a city with 5000 cars, ther e will be at least 250 accidents happening everyday, which also burdens the public health ser vices.On the contrary, Constructing public traffic transportation may be an ideal solution to thes e problems. For example, city buses and railways are widely used or being constructed by ma ny cities. People can take buses easily, which can be found every 10 minutes or less even in t he peak time. Actually, Nottingham Transport Company is building its own light railway in t he city, “It will be completed in the next year, the tickets will be very competitive and at th e same time the travel will be very safe and comfortable.”announced by the speak man of t he company,On the other hand, public traffic had its own disadvantages. Usually , it cann’t provide doo r-to-door service. It is inconvenient to go shopping by public vehicles. Sometimes you will have to wait a long time for the train. What’s more, quite a lot of people are keen on dri ving.In conclusion, developing the public traffic transportation is a useful approach to deal wit h these difficulties. A possible way, if not the best, is to tax private cars heavily and use thes e revenues to provide citizens a cheaper public traffic service.范文3With the development of science and technology, the cars have already become the importa nt component in our daily life gradually. Cars make our life convenient and swift. Howeve r, too many cars have caused very serious social problems. Some people claim that the disad vantages of car are more than the advantages. I doubt whether the argument can bear muc h analysis.Since one century [ago], the auto industry has [been] developed at full speed worldwide, an d has brought the enormous progresses to our life. For example, the car is the most conveni ent tool of transportation. We can [be] on and off duty by car every day, we can go to trave l by car on the vacation, we can utilize the cars to deal with some emergency too. The car [i s] playing an important role in our daily life. They make our rhythm of life faster and faste r, make our business become more and more efficient.On the other hand, the development of the automobile has brought a lot of infant industry t o people, Give people countless employment opportunities too. Such as, manufacturing ind ustry, repairing industry and maintaining industry. We are enjoying the convenience that th e cars bring to us; at the same time we can utilize the auto industry to support ourselves.Ho wever, we can not ignore that too many cars cause enormous social problems, for example, t raffic jam, air pollution, traffic accident, to which we have to find a solution.In a word, the cars have brought enormous change to our life; the advantages are far more t han the disadvantages. We should recognize the merit of the cars, and do our best to solve t he problems. If so, our life will be brighter.Version 00106范文1Nowhere in the world has the issue of tobacco been so much debated as inour society. Nowadays, tobacco is more harmful than drug to people’shealth, therefore many people think that smoking is legal that is a direct andprimary reason to induce this kind of problem. The above point is certainlytrue; this essay will outline three reasons.The main reason is that tobacco is a silent killer to smokers. Tobacco isknown to be the probable cause of some 25 different diseases, and for some,such as lung cancer, bronchitis and emphysema, it is the main cause.According to a WHO report four million people die yearly from tobacco-related diseases, that is one death every eight seconds. Tobacco is significantlybecoming a greater cause of death and disability than any other single cause.Another reason is that more and more young people are under 18 years old who smoke cigar ette have been blinded by the deceit of tobacconists. Tobacco among adolescents remains st ubbornly persistent. Smoking among adolescents rose in the 1990s in several developed cou ntries, such as China,Vietnam and Thailand . While new markets are being opened by the t obacco industry actions, old markets have not been closed. Tobacco is a global threat. Last but not the least reason is the increase in cigarette smuggling. Becauseof tobacco smuggling, the legal retailing and distribution systems are badlyaffected, and faced with increased lawlessness and heavy tax losses. This behavior severely affects the economy.In conclusion, the tobacco should be considered illegal. Perhaps a pack ofcigarettes is less harmful than another drug, but tobacco is actually thebiggest killer of all the drugs.=================================================范文2Advertisements of tobacco and those of “smoking is harmful”are often seentogether. But there has been an on-going argument about whether or nottobacco should be forbidden and made illegal. I have always believed thatsmoking should be illegal for the following reasons.First, smoking does great harm to human health and causes many diseases.It is reported that more than 70% of lung cancer sufferers are smokers, andthe average life-span of smokers is seven years less than that of non-smokers. Moreover, it hurts not only smokers, but also the ones around the smokers. Many researchers claim that breathing “second-hand smoke” maybe even more harmful than smoking.Second, many social problems and disasters can be attributed to smoking.For instance, many wives cannot bear their husbands’ smoking all the time,which causes many quarrels, or even divorces. Furthermore, the biggest firedisaster in China, the Daxinganling fire disaster, was caused by a burningcigarette end, and the cost of the resulting loss was unimaginable.Last, smoking tobaccos is a main source of air pollution.A magazine said thatfor every cigarette smoked each day,a whole tree is needed to clean the air.In other words, smoking one less cigar every day equals planting a tree. Itis a brilliant contribution to the earth we are living on.In a word, all the above demonstrate that smoking harms yourselves as wellas your neighbors, pollutes the air we ourselves are breathing, and evenagitates the social peace. So, in my opinion, tobacco should be strictlyforbidden, and smoking should be made illegal.范文3there has long been controversy over the legality and apparent acceptance of tobacco in soci ety .some hold that cigarettes and other tobacco containing products should be banned, tha t is, treated as narcotics.personally,i agree with this point of view for the following reasons:although cigarettes do not offer as intense an effect as drugs like heroin and cocaine,they ran k higher in the level of dependence it creates in the user.thousands of smokers try to rid the mselves of cigarettes but cannot,because of the physiological dependence they developed,chi efly imputable to its chemical nicotine.this explains why smokers continue their habit despit e the numerous health warnings. furthermore,medical science has now proved beyond a dou bt that smoking kills.with all the other causes of preventable deaths such as alcohol,illegal dr ugs,aids,suicide,road accidents,fire,and guns,cigarettes still account for more preventable dea ths than all of those combined.more disturbingly,whilst the use of heroin is dangerous solely to the users,the use of tobacc o endangers those who are in their vicinity as well. this phenomenon, known as passive smo king, nulls the counter-argument that putting one's own health at risk through smoking shou ld be up to one's own individual choice.reports have shown that the amount of second-han d smoke inhaled by a typical nonsmoker is equivalent to one cigarette smoked per day,and w hat is more,passive smoking can increase a nonsmoker's chance of getting cancer by ten to t hirty two per cent.there are those who will say that the black market created by outlawing tobacco will produc e deadlier cigarettes because the product standards of the bootleggers are not as high.howev er,we should all bear in mind that legal cigarettes cause roughly four hundred thousand deaths a year.it is hard to imagine the limited distribution provided by the criminal underworld c ould compete with this tragic figure.to sum up, the harm visited upon our society by tobacco usage is substantial.there will be n o solution other than to control tobacco much in the same way that the government now co ntrols drugs which could allow people to remain attentive to the seriousness of the effects o f these substances,and hopefully to prohibit their usage.范文4Apparently, it would seem that tobacco is totally different substance from drugs, and it can b e used freedom by public. In fact, however, our authority should make tobacco illegal as wel l as drugs, and using of tobacco should be controlled strictly.Tobacco only can be used for research and medical purpose. As far as I am concerned, as a kind of dope, tobacco has been widely used to help patients alleviate their pain in surger y. At the same time, ordinary people should not be allowed to access it legally for two main r easons.Among countless factors which influence my inclination, there is a most conspicuous one: i t is harmful that smokers addict to tobacco. Many decades ago, scientists have already foun d that there is a definite link between smoking and bronchial troubles, cardiac disease and lu ng cancer. More seriously, it not only has negative influence for smokers, but others living o r working in same surrounding, even the next generation of a smoking pregnant women ma y be harmed by so-called “second hand smoking”. Research shows that sometimes “seco nd hand smoking” is more dangerous than smoking directly, because, at least smokers can g et the protection from filter tips to some extent. Thus, compared to the hazard of drugs, tob acco can involve more other innocent people and harm their health unknowingly.The second aspect relates to the problem that our natural resources and money are wasted s enselessly during the course of planting, transporting and manufacturing tobacco. In light o f a statistics, China consumes nearly 1,000 tons of wood fibers to produce cigarettes annuall y. Besides, the investment absorbed by tobacco manufacturers every year, is enough to solv e all financial troubles that higher education have to face. Obviously, if tobacco is banned b y our governments, it means that considerable money will be saved.In summary, judging from all the evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion th at tobacco should be forbidden as well as drugs except for a few special purposes, such as re search and medicine.补充With the development of society, our life and working pressure are greater and greater. In th is way, a lot of people have become smokers. Tobacco, as a kind of drugs, prevails in the soc iety. Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom be use, but other s, in contrast, deem it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs and that is als o my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases, lung cancer, and the immu ne system diseases. These diseases are all mankind's healthy enemies. The statistics have sho wed that people who die of the lung cancer, over 90% are smokers. In these smokers, 85% a re chain smoker. So, obviously, there is enormous danger to the human health in smoking.In addition, smoking not only dangerous to smoker, but also do harm to people at smoker' s side. The tobacco contains a large number of noxious substances, such as nicotine. Just a s a famous physician says, smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronically.However, the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve, within short time. People, especial ly, who have heavy working pressure, are prone to produce sense of relying on to cigarett e. Moreover, as everyone knows, a lot of countries impose the heavy taxation to tobacco ma nufacturer and seller, thus, if the tobacco business is considered as the illegal activities, the re venues of the country will be reduced correspondingly.In a word, the danger to people of cigarette is obvious. Though it can help us flee away fro m pressure, this to use health as cost. Our government should forbid the production of the t obacco, make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.With the development of society, our life and working pressure are [getting] greater and grea ter.In this way, a lot of people have become smokers. Tobacco, as a kind of drugs, prevails in th e society. Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom [to] be [use d, but others, in contrast, deem [that] it should be made [as] illegal as the same way as other drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases, lung cancer, and the immu ne system diseases. [all of these diseases are enemies of mankind's healthy] . The statistics ha ve showed that people who die of the lung cancer, over 90%, are smokers. [Among] these s mokers, 85% are chain smokers. So, obviously, there is enormous danger to the human healt h in smoking.In addition, smoking not only dangerous to smokers, but also [does] harm to people at smok er's side. The tobacco contains a large number of noxious substances, such as nicotine. Jus t as a famous physician says, smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronically. However, the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve, within short time. People, especial ly, who have heavy working pressure, are prone to produce sense of relying on to cigarett e. Moreover, as everyone knows, a lot of countries impose the heavy taxation to tobacco ma nufacturer and seller, thus, if the tobacco business is considered as the illegal activities, the re venues of the country will be reduced correspondingly.To sum up, the danger to people of cigarette is obvious. Though it can help us flee away fro m pressure, this to use health as cost. Our government should forbid the production of the t obacco, make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.Although it is a freedom to use tobacco{烟草} while some people think it should be made il legal as the same way as other drugs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?What’s yo ur opinion?A:Tobacco should be made illegal, I agree with this idea personally. I hope most drugs can b e made illegal, because, as far as I know, they are bad to our health. However, currently mos t countries still keep it free to use tobacco, and this situation seems to be very hard to chang e in a short time.From my own experience, using tobacco is not a good thing, especially using is for a long ti me. It will lead to many kinds of diseases, more importantly, many of them are fatale. One o f my friends died from using too much tobacco, and it is believed there are many more peop le like this. The other thing that I am concerned of is, if a country doesn’t make using toba cco illegal, many young people will have a chance to use it, i.e. students. It is very dangerous, because if someone gets addicted to this when he is very young, he will then almost surel y have a big health problem when he is old.I am happy to see that, although it is free to use tobacco in many countries, most of those co untries still somehow try not to encourage people using it. For example, tobacco advertisem ent is banned in many countries, and for many countries, smoking is banned in public place s. Overall, most countries are trying to stop the use of tobacco, though it will take sometim e. In my opinion, it is essential to limit the use of tobacco, and I hope everyone doesn’t use. Version 00108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatersand sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care andeducation. Agree or not agree?=================================================范文1Nowadays, the gap between the city and the countryside becomes more and more overt, whi ch arouses colossal concerns. To understand the solution, let’s take a closer look at the cau ses of the gap at first.The main reason of the gap is the unequal investment between city and rural area. China is a typical example. While more and more money is being invested to the coastal areas and b ig cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, the lack of investment barriers greatly the society dev elopment of rural area and western regionsThe low education level partly sharps the gap. There is no doubt that the prime force of pro ductivity is education. However, because of poverty, thousands of people go to work withou t graduating from primary school. The poorer, the few children go to school. This bad cycl e finally leads to the dream of rich becoming a dream that is hard to realize. Moreover, the rural area is short of people with high quality. A survey proved that most of u niversity students, whether they come from city or countryside, choose big cities instead of p oor areas to work. The rural area can neither adept talent man nor attract talent man. No wo nder the gap is increasing largely.Hence, The government ought to knock itself out to decrease the gap as soon as possible. Fi rst, balance the investment between city and rural area. In addition, the education level shoul d be improved, especially pay attention on raising high quality people. Besides, let more peo ple realize the latent capacity of rural area in order to attract talent and investment. The set up of CCTV channel12-western region channel is a good example.Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step, can the gap between the citi es and the countryside be bridged.范文2Nowadays, many people argue against the government putting money onbuilding theaters and sports stadiums. They have claimed that medical careand education would benefit the citizens and the country much more.However, I believe it is worth building more theaters and arenas.First, stadiums and arenas provide ideal places for people to have physicalexercises and entertainment. After a whole week’s hardworking, people canenjoy a wonderful football game in the weekend, and refresh themselveswith a good relaxation there. Moreover, the physical exercises are good forpeople’s health, which will ease the pressure of medical care.Second, theaters and museums can be used as base areas of culture and history education. The British Museum, which is the largest one in the world,provides visitors with knowledge about the world culture and the arts. Thevisitors to the museum are all overwhelmed by the magnificence of thecultural and historical displays featuring mankind’s achievements. In addition, the performances shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of citizens. People can enjoy ballet, symphony, and Peking Opera in a theater,which contain the soul of Chinese and western cultures.Third, running theaters and stadiums can earn much money.And this amountof money can do great contribution in other fields, including medical care,and education. After winning the Olympic 2008,Beijing made a plan to spend160 billion RMB building an Olympic Village. This will surely attract manysports fans to China, which would be much rewarded, not only in economybut the whole society.You can tell form my commentary above,since building theaters and stadiumsbenefit not only individuals but also the state, it is very worthy of theseexpenses.And the government should speed up the pace of the constructions.范文3An argument often heard these days is that whether or not the government should put money on building theaters and stadiums. Some believe that instead of spending money on this ar ea, Medical care and education, both of which are basic developing factors of one country sh ould be spent more money on. After weighting the pros and cons, I disagree with this opinio n.Firstly, theaters and stadiums are best choice for people relaxing. Most of workers, especiall y white collar who often feel nervous after one day’s hard work, need to relax both mentall y and physically. Compared with staying at home, it is much better way to stay in comfortabl e theater and listen to a wonderful concert.In addition, going to theaters and stadiums affect the same effect as education and medica l care. Having more chances to go to theaters can help them mold character. There is no bet ter way to keep healthy than doing proper sports in the daily. In this way, the culture and hea lth will be improved greatly, which plays the same role of education and medical care. Moreover, theaters and stadiums are basis essential facilities to a developed city. Take holdin g an Olympic games as an example, it is no doubt it will take millions of money to build stad iums. Why the winner country is proud of that. Because this is a confirmation given by whol e world.Of course I don’t mean that the more theaters and stadiums, the better society will be, afte r all, nothing can take the important place of medical care and education.In summary, the key point is to keep both of this two part developing. Only in this way, ca n all people live better in future.V108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sports stadi ums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree? Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much money on bu ilding theaters and sports stadiums. They maintain that medical care and education would be nefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate building more theaters a nd arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building theaters and arenas, but h ere are two main reasons:What strikes me most is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places for people t o build up a world of relaxation. After five days of hardworking, people can refresh themsel ves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game there. Meanwhile, exercises i s to health what water is to fish. The physical exercises can benefit people’s health, which will surely ease the pressure of medical care. Moreover, it provides people a good opportunit y to enter into communion with each other, which will benefit people’s mental health.Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “socia l classroom” of culture and history education. The Sydney Opera House, which is the moth er and father of all modern landmark buildings, has come to define not only a city, but also a n entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concept of modernism and the ne ver properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon. In additi on, the performances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the theaters wil l also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over the world.Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but building theaters and sp orts stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physically, but a nation a nd continent permanentlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sports stadi ums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree? Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much money on bu ilding theaters and sports stadiums. They maintain that medical care and education would be nefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate building more theaters a nd arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building theaters and arenas, but h ere are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places for peo ple to build up a world of relaxation. After five days of hardworking, people can refresh the mselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game there. Meanwhile, exercis es is to health what water is to fish. The physical exercises can benefit people’s health, whic h will surely ease the pressure of medical care. Moreover, it provides people a good opportu nity to enter into communion with each other, which will benefit people’s mental health. Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “socia l classroom” of culture and history education. The Sydney Opera House, which is the moth er and father of all modern landmark buildings, has come to define not only a city, but also a n entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concept of modernism and the ne ver properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon. In addition, the performances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the theaters wil l also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over the world.Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but building theaters and sp orts stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physically, but a nation a nd continent permanentlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatres and sports stadi ums, they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree?Government, as the controller of the macroeconomy, usually put large amount of money o n building theatres and sports stadiums to stimulate the consumption. Especially when globl e economy is in recession, stimulation is one of the methods for government to catch the ec onomy’s fall. However, to my opinion, government should spend more money on medica l care and education.For men, health and education are the basic elements for development. We often say healt h is the best wealth. Without health, even if you are a millionaire you will not enjoy your lif e. The society needs more medical care to ensure people to live happily and create more for tune. This is a physical base for development of society. The spiritual foundation should b e obtained from education. Only with more knowledge, can we catch up with the improvem ent of economy, society and technology. We need healthy people and brilliant minds to cha nge our world into a better one. Theatres and sports stadiums are signs for higher standar d of living. Compared with the basic development factors, they are minor. Insufficiency in medical care and education will impose great stress on poor people and prod uce unstable factors for society. If government invested too much on recreational places, i t has to lessen the expenditure on medical care and education since the total amount of distri butable money will not be changed. Such action will do little influence on riches, but affec t poors greatly. They can’t take out money from their own pockets to see doctors nor purs ue higher education. Dissatisfaction for government will arise gradually. Then, how long th e government can exist with the society fluctuated?。
雅思大作文高分范文(热门27篇)

雅思大作文高分范文(热门27篇)Though it is never easy to fix these feelings of unhappiness, there are possible measures to be taken to enhance the wellbeing of children who are under constant pressures. To begin with, parents have to draw a line on the expectations of theirchildren and find out their true potentials, rather than pushing them to unrealistic limits. Meanwhile, with patience and guidance, parents should keep an eye on their children who fall victims to online pressure through social networking. Simultaneously, the authorities should do more to regulate advertising that are intended for children who are anxious tobuy unnecessary things.雅思写作高分表达Point at 指向......Perspective 角度Reduce 减少;减轻Pleasure 快乐;愉悦Way too much 太过了Unrealistically 不切实际地Backfire 回火;事与愿违End up 最终落得个......Peer pressure 同龄人压力Intensity 强度Purposefully 有意地Afford 负担得起Fix 解决Enhance 提高Constant 长期的Potential 潜力(的)Keep an eye on... 关注......Fall victim to... 沦为......的牺牲品Simultaneously 同时Frankly 坦白地说Pessimistic 悲观的In the foreseeable future 在可见的未来Model Answer:From a middle class family, I was born in Hsin Ying, Tainan on October 10th, 1965. My father is a civil official at Tainan City Government. My mother is a house wife good at . Although I am the only child of my parents, I am by no mans a spoiled one. On the contrary, I have been expected to be . I study hard atschool. Besides texts knowledge, journalism is my favorite; whenever reading, my heart is filled with great joy and interesting.从中产阶级家庭,我出生在Hsin Ying,台南1965年10月10日。
新雅思双边范文(推荐十三篇)

雅思双边范文(推荐十三篇)5雅思双边范文(篇一)Over the past century, science and technology has been developing unprecedentedly and changing every aspect of people's lives. In my point of view, technology brings about higher efficiency and greater convenience,even though it causes confusion and disorder under some circumstances.The benefits of modern technologies are multiple. Automation iswidely used on the assembly line, setting free millions of peoplefrom the arduous and repetitive to the widespread use of the Internet, people have easier access to information than ever before. Instead of going to the library to consult reference books,they can acquire any information they want via the Internet. Moreover,emails and mobile phones enable people to stay in touch more conveniently and efficiently, compared with the old days when they had to go to the post office or visit others in person.Despite the above-mentioned benefits,we cannot deny the fact that technology may lead to complexity and inconvenience in some cases.For instance,some old people find it difficult to use publicfacilities equipped with electronic-devices. However, this issue can be addressed with clear instructions provided. Another example is cyber fraud,which is difficult to prevent as the false informationcan spread very fast on the who get deceived may complain that the virtual space generates more crimes.Overall,there is no denying that some problems and troubles may occur When various new technologies are applied to people's lives. However, returning to a simple life without technology is not a solution and I believe a better future of mankind lies with the further progress of science and technology.雅思双边范文(篇二)剑桥雅思6test1大作文范文,剑桥雅思6test1大作文task2高分范文+ 真题答案细胞生成,剑桥通用书目从上图可以看出雅思作文高分范文是有一定的规律的。
雅思大作文范文100篇

v105some people claim that the disadvantages of the car are more than the advantages, do you agree or disagree?范文1the birth of cars have made an enormous change to our life.in the past,we travel from one place to another only by foot,nowaday,cars can do it .its goes withour saying th at the invention of cars bring great benefit to all of us.but as proverb goes:no garden w ithout weeds.car is not exception.owing a car has a lot of advantages.for one thing,car provide us the most convient wa y of transportation.we can get around freely without spenting a lot of time.emotionally, i always found driving is so exciting.for another,its the comfortable to drive a car.In w inter.drivers always can stay warm and dry even in rainy whether,in addition,drivers a re usually safe in their cars when they are out at night.Cars bring the human merits,their side-effects graudually come to the surface.firstly,t o run a car need a lot of oil,which is getting less and less.the increasing number of car s contribute the lacking of energy.secondlly,as more and more cars are used,the traffi c ecpecially in big cities is getting heaver and heavier,which lead to the serious socia l problem--traffic jam.in addition,the inceasing numbers of cars ,which excaust sent a huge quantities of carbon monoxide into atmosphere.it make the air of cities unbre athabe,it strip people contact with frensh air.therefore,the new energy should be explored to replace the oil so that our envionment al pollution can be avioded .and the strick law should be issued to keep the numbers o f cars under control.thus,our heavier traffic can be solluted!范文2Private cars vs Public trafficAs traffic problems become more and more serious in many cities of developed and d eveloping countries, their governments have to try hard and loads of money and energ y have been spent to deal with them.Firstly, it is not efficient for the commuters to use their private cars to and back from t heir workplaces. Occasionally we can see they have to sit on the wheels wasting time and fuel in a heavy traffic jam. At the same time, through burning the fossil fuels, gr een house gas CO2, CO1, acid rain gas SO2, fumes and dusts are being released into t he atmosphere, all of which heavily overload the environment. Thirdly, with the incre ase of private cars, the road traffic accidents are also rise dramatically. For example, i n a city with 5000 cars, there will be at least 250 accidents happening everyday, which also burden the public healthy services.On the contrary, expected public traffic may be an ideal solution to these problems. F or example city buses and railways are widely used or being constructed by many citi es. People can take buses easily, which can be found every 10 minutes or less in the p eak time. Actually, Nottingham Transport Company is building its own light railway i n the city, which is announced by the speak man of the company, “It will be complete d in the next year, the tickets will be very competitive and at the same time the trave l will be very safe and comfortable.”On the other hand, public traffic had its own disadvantages. Usually it cannot provid e door-to-door service. It is inconvenient to go shopping by public vehicles. Sometime s you must wait a long time for the train. And quite a lot of people prefer to enjoy driv ing.In conclusion, developing the public traffic is a useful approach to deal with these diff iculties. One possible way, if not the best, is to taxi private cars heavily and use thes e revenues to provide citizens cheaper public traffic services.范文3With the development of science and technology, the cars have already become the im portant component in our daily life gradually. Cars make our life convenient and swif t. However, too many cars have caused very serious social problems. Some people cla im that the disadvantages of car are more than the advantages. I doubt whether the arg ument can bear much analysis.Since one century [ago], the auto industry has [been] developed at full speed worldwi de, and has brought the enormous progresses to our life. For example, the car is the m ost convenient tool of transportation. We can [be] on and off duty by car every day, w e can go to travel by car on the vacation, we can utilize the cars to deal with some eme rgency too. The car [is] playing an important role in our daily life. They make our rhyt hm of life faster and faster, make our business become more and more efficient.On the other hand, the development of the automobile has brought a lot of infant indu stry to people, Give people countless employment opportunities too. Such as, manufac turing industry, repairing industry and maintaining industry. We are enjoying the conv enience that the cars bring to us; at the same time we can utilize the auto industry to s upport ourselves.However, we can not ignore that too many cars cause enormous soci al problems, for example, traffic jam, air pollution, traffic accident, to which we hav e to find a solution.In a word, the cars have brought enormous change to our life; the advantages are far more than the disadvantages. We should recognize the merit of the cars, and do ou r best to solve the problems. If so, our life will be brighter.Version 00106范文1Nowhere in the world has the issue of tobacco been so much debated as inour society. Nowadays, tobacco is more harmful than drug to people‟shealth, therefore many people think that smoking is legal that is a direct andprimary reason to induce this kind of problem. The above point is certainlytrue; this essay will outline three reasons.The main reason is that tobacco is a silent killer to smokers. Tobacco isknown to be the probable cause of some 25 different diseases, and for some,such as lung cancer, bronchitis and emphysema, it is the main cause.According to a WHO report four million people die yearly from tobacco-related diseases, that is one death every eight seconds. Tobacco is significantly becoming a greater cause of death and disability than any other single cause.Another reason is that more and more young people are under 18 years old who smok e cigarette have been blinded by the deceit of tobacconists. Tobacco among adolescen ts remains stubbornly persistent. Smoking among adolescents rose in the 1990s in sev eral developed countries, such as China,Vietnam and Thailand . While new markets a re being opened by the tobacco industry actions, old markets have not been closed. To bacco is a global threat.Last but not the least reason is the increase in cigarette smuggling. Becauseof tobacco smuggling, the legal retailing and distribution systems are badly affected, and faced with increased lawlessness and heavy tax losses. This behavior severely affects the economy.In conclusion, the tobacco should be considered illegal. Perhaps a pack of cigarettes is less harmful than another drug, but tobacco is actually thebiggest killer of all the drugs.=================================================范文2Advertisements of tobacco and those of “smoking is harmful”are often seentogether. But there has been an on-going argument about whether or nottobacco should be forbidden and made illegal. I have always believed that smoking should be illegal for the following reasons.First, smoking does great harm to human health and causes many diseases.It is reported that more than 70% of lung cancer sufferers are smokers, andthe average life-span of smokers is seven years less than that of non-smokers. Moreover, it hurts not only smokers, but also the ones around the smokers. Many researchers claim that breathing “second-hand smoke” maybe even more harmful than smoking.Second, many social problems and disasters can be attributed to smoking.For instance, many wives cannot bear their husbands‟ smoking all the time,which causes many quarrels, or even divorces. Furthermore, the biggest firedisaster in China, the Daxinganling fire disaster, was caused by a burningcigarette end, and the cost of the resulting loss was unimaginable.Last, smoking tobaccos is a main source of air pollution.A magazine said thatfor every cigarette smoked each day,a whole tree is needed to clean the air.In other words, smoking one less cigar every day equals planting a tree. Itis a brilliant contribution to the earth we are living on.In a word, all the above demonstrate that smoking harms yourselves as wellas your neighbors, pollutes the air we ourselves are breathing, and evenagitates the social peace. So, in my opinion, tobacco should be strictly forbidden, and smoking should be made illegal.范文3there has long been controversy over the legality and apparent acceptance of tobacco i n society .some hold that cigarettes and other tobacco containing products should be b anned, that is, treated as narcotics.personally,i agree with this point of view for the fol lowing reasons:although cigarettes do not offer as intense an effect as drugs like heroin and cocaine,th ey rank higher in the level of dependence it creates in the user.thousands of smokers tr y to rid themselves of cigarettes but cannot,because of the physiological dependence t hey developed,chiefly imputable to its chemical nicotine.this explains why smokers c ontinue their habit despite the numerous health warnings. furthermore,medical scienc e has now proved beyond a doubt that smoking kills.with all the other causes of preve ntable deaths such as alcohol,illegal drugs,aids,suicide,road accidents,fire,and guns,ci garettes still account for more preventable deaths than all of those combined.more disturbingly,whilst the use of heroin is dangerous solely to the users,the use of t obacco endangers those who are in their vicinity as well. this phenomenon, known a s passive smoking, nulls the counter-argument that putting one's own health at risk thr ough smoking should be up to one's own individual choice.reports have shown that th e amount of second-hand smoke inhaled by a typical nonsmoker is equivalent to one c igarette smoked per day,and what is more,passive smoking can increase a nonsmoker' s chance of getting cancer by ten to thirty two per cent.there are those who will say that the black market created by outlawing tobacco will p roduce deadlier cigarettes because the product standards of the bootleggers are not a s high.however,we should all bear in mind that legal cigarettes cause roughly four hun dred thousand deaths a year.it is hard to imagine the limited distribution provided by t he criminal underworld could compete with this tragic figure.to sum up, the harm visited upon our society by tobacco usage is substantial.there wil l be no solution other than to control tobacco much in the same way that the governme nt now controls drugs which could allow people to remain attentive to the seriousnes s of the effects of these substances,and hopefully to prohibit their usage.范文4Apparently, it would seem that tobacco is totally different substance from drugs, and i t can be used freedom by public. In fact, however, our authority should make tobacc o illegal as well as drugs, and using of tobacco should be controlled strictly.Tobacco only can be used for research and medical purpose. As far as I am concerne d, as a kind of dope, tobacco has been widely used to help patients alleviate their pai n in surgery. At the same time, ordinary people should not be allowed to access it lega lly for two main reasons.Among countless factors which influence my inclination, there is a most conspicuou s one: it is harmful that smokers addict to tobacco. Many decades ago, scientists hav e already found that there is a definite link between smoking and bronchial troubles, c ardiac disease and lung cancer. More seriously, it not only has negative influence for s mokers, but others living or working in same surrounding, even the next generation o f a smoking pregnant women may be harmed by so-called “second hand smoking”. Re search shows that sometimes “second hand smoking” is more dangerous than smokin g directly, because, at least smokers can get the protection from filter tips to some ext ent. Thus, compared to the hazard of drugs, tobacco can involve more other innocen t people and harm their health unknowingly.The second aspect relates to the problem that our natural resources and money are was ted senselessly during the course of planting, transporting and manufacturing tobacc o. In light of a statistics, China consumes nearly 1,000 tons of wood fibers to produc e cigarettes annually. Besides, the investment absorbed by tobacco manufacturers ever y year, is enough to solve all financial troubles that higher education have to face. Ob viously, if tobacco is banned by our governments, it means that considerable money w ill be saved.In summary, judging from all the evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclu sion that tobacco should be forbidden as well as drugs except for a few special purpos es, such as research and medicine.补充With the development of society, our life and working pressure are greater and greate r. In this way, a lot of people have become smokers. Tobacco, as a kind of drugs, prev ails in the society. Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedo m be use, but others, in contrast, deem it should be made illegal as the same way as ot her drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases, lung cancer, and th e immune system diseases. These diseases are all mankind's healthy enemies. The stat istics have showed that people who die of the lung cancer, over 90% are smokers. In t hese smokers, 85% are chain smoker. So, obviously, there is enormous danger to the h uman health in smoking.In addition, smoking not only dangerous to smoker, but also do harm to people at smo ker's side. The tobacco contains a large number of noxious substances, such as nicotin e. Just as a famous physician says, smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronicall y.However, the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve, within short time. People, e specially, who have heavy working pressure, are prone to produce sense of relying o n to cigarette. Moreover, as everyone knows, a lot of countries impose the heavy taxat ion to tobacco manufacturer and seller, thus, if the tobacco business is considered as t he illegal activities, the revenues of the country will be reduced correspondingly.In a word, the danger to people of cigarette is obvious. Though it can help us flee awa y from pressure, this to use health as cost. Our government should forbid the producti on of the tobacco, make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.With the development of society, our life and working pressure are [getting] greater a nd greater.In this way, a lot of people have become smokers. Tobacco, as a kind of drugs, prevail s in the society. Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom [t o] be [used, but others, in contrast, deem [that] it should be made [as] illegal as the sa me way as other drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases, lung cancer, and th e immune system diseases. [all of these diseases are enemies of mankind's healthy] . T he statistics have showed that people who die of the lung cancer, over 90%, are smoke rs. [Among] these smokers, 85% are chain smokers. So, obviously, there is enormou s danger to the human health in smoking.In addition, smoking not only dangerous to smokers, but also [does] harm to people a t smoker's side. The tobacco contains a large number of noxious substances, such as n icotine. Just as a famous physician says, smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chro nically.However, the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve, within short time. People, e specially, who have heavy working pressure, are prone to produce sense of relying o n to cigarette. Moreover, as everyone knows, a lot of countries impose the heavy taxat ion to tobacco manufacturer and seller, thus, if the tobacco business is considered as t he illegal activities, the revenues of the country will be reduced correspondingly.To sum up, the danger to people of cigarette is obvious. Though it can help us flee aw ay from pressure, this to use health as cost. Our government should forbid the product ion of the tobacco, make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.Although it is a freedom to use tobacco{烟草} while some people think it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs. To what extent do you agree or disagre e?What‟s your opinion?A:Tobacco should be made illegal, I agree with this idea personally. I hope most drugs c an be made illegal, because, as far as I know, they are bad to our health. However, cur rently most countries still keep it free to use tobacco, and this situation seems to be ve ry hard to change in a short time.From my own experience, using tobacco is not a good thing, especially using is for a l ong time. It will lead to many kinds of diseases, more importantly, many of them are f atale. One of my friends died from using too much tobacco, and it is believed there ar e many more people like this. The other thing that I am concerned of is, if a country d oesn‟t make using tobacco illegal, many young people will have a chance to use it, i.e. students. It is very dangerous, because if someone gets addicted to this when he is v ery young, he will then almost surely have a big health problem when he is old.I am happy to see that, although it is free to use tobacco in many countries, most of th ose countries still somehow try not to encourage people using it. For example, tobacc o advertisement is banned in many countries, and for many countries, smoking is ban ned in public places. Overall, most countries are trying to stop the use of tobacco, tho ugh it will take sometime. In my opinion, it is essential to limit the use of tobacco, an d I hope everyone doesn‟t use.Version 00108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatersand sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree?=================================================范文1Nowadays, the gap between the city and the countryside becomes more and more over t, which arouses colossal concerns. To understand the solution, let‟s take a closer loo k at the causes of the gap at first.The main reason of the gap is the unequal investment between city and rural area. Chi na is a typical example. While more and more money is being invested to the coastal a reas and big cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, the lack of investment barriers great ly the society development of rural area and western regionsThe low education level partly sharps the gap. There is no doubt that the prime force o f productivity is education. However, because of poverty, thousands of people go to w ork without graduating from primary school. The poorer, the few children go to schoo l. This bad cycle finally leads to the dream of rich becoming a dream that is hard to re alize.Moreover, the rural area is short of people with high quality. A survey proved that mo st of university students, whether they come from city or countryside, choose big citie s instead of poor areas to work. The rural area can neither adept talent man nor attrac t talent man. No wonder the gap is increasing largely.Hence, The government ought to knock itself out to decrease the gap as soon as possi ble. First, balance the investment between city and rural area. In addition, the educatio n level should be improved, especially pay attention on raising high quality people. B esides, let more people realize the latent capacity of rural area in order to attract talen t and investment. The set up of CCTV channel12-western region channel is a good ex ample.Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step, can the gap between t he cities and the countryside be bridged.范文2Nowadays, many people argue against the government putting money onbuilding theaters and sports stadiums. They have claimed that medical careand education would benefit the citizens and the country much more.However, I believe it is worth building more theaters and arenas.First, stadiums and arenas provide ideal places for people to have physical exercises and entertainment. After a whole week‟s hardworking, people canenjoy a wonderful football game in the weekend, and refresh themselveswith a good relaxation there. Moreover, the physical exercises are good forpeople‟s health, which will ease the pressure of medical care.Second, theaters and museums can be used as base areas of culture and history education. The British Museum, which is the largest one in the world, provides visitors with knowledge about the world culture and the arts. Thevisitors to the museum are all overwhelmed by the magnificence of thecultural and historical displays featuring mankind‟s achievements. In addition, the performances shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of citizens. People can enjoy ballet, symphony, and Peking Opera in a theater,which contain the soul of Chinese and western cultures.Third, running theaters and stadiums can earn much money.And this amountof money can do great contribution in other fields, including medical care,and education. After winning the Olympic 2008,Beijing made a plan to spend160 billion RMB building an Olympic Village. This will surely attract many sports fans to China, which would be much rewarded, not only in economybut the whole society.You can tell form my commentary above,since building theaters and stadiumsbenefit not only individuals but also the state, it is very worthy of these expenses.And the government should speed up the pace of the constructions.范文3An argument often heard these days is that whether or not the government should pu t money on building theaters and stadiums. Some believe that instead of spending mo ney on this area, Medical care and education, both of which are basic developing facto rs of one country should be spent more money on. After weighting the pros and con s, I disagree with this opinion.Firstly, theaters and stadiums are best choice for people relaxing. Most of workers, especially white collar who often feel nervous after one day‟s hard work, need to relax b oth mentally and physically. Compared with staying at home, it is much better way t o stay in comfortable theater and listen to a wonderful concert.In addition, going to theaters and stadiums affect the same effect as education and me dical care. Having more chances to go to theaters can help them mold character. Ther e is no better way to keep healthy than doing proper sports in the daily. In this way, th e culture and health will be improved greatly, which plays the same role of educatio n and medical care.Moreover, theaters and stadiums are basis essential facilities to a developed city. Tak e holding an Olympic games as an example, it is no doubt it will take millions of mon ey to build stadiums. Why the winner country is proud of that. Because this is a confir mation given by whole world.Of course I don‟t mean that the more theaters and stadiums, the better society will b e, after all, nothing can take the important place of medical care and education.In summary, the key point is to keep both of this two part developing. Only in this wa y, can all people live better in future.V108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sport s stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or n ot agree?Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much mone y on building theaters and sports stadiums. They maintain that medical care and educa tion would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate build ing more theaters and arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building t heaters and arenas, but here are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places fo r people to build up a world of relaxation. After five days of hardworking, people ca n refresh themselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game ther e. Meanwhile, exercises is to health what water is to fish. The physical exercises can b enefit people‟s health, which will surely ease the pressure of medical care. Moreove r, it provides people a good opportunity to enter into communion with each other, whi ch will benefit people‟s mental health.Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “s ocial classroom” of culture and history education. The Sydney Opera House, which i s the mother and father of all modern landmark buildings, has come to define not onl y a city, but also an entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concept o f modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of it s creator Jorn Utzon. In addition, the performances which contain the soul of human c ivilization shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all ov er the world.Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but building theater s and sports stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physicall y, but a nation and continent permanentlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sport s stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or n ot agree?Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much mone y on building theaters and sports stadiums. They maintain that medical care and educa tion would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate build ing more theaters and arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building t heaters and arenas, but here are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places fo r people to build up a world of relaxation. After five days of hardworking, people ca n refresh themselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game ther e. Meanwhile, exercises is to health what water is to fish. The physical exercises can b enefit people‟s health, which will surely ease the pressure of medical care. Moreove r, it provides people a good opportunity to enter into communion with each other, whi ch will benefit people‟s mental health.Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “s ocial classroom” of culture and history education. The Sydney Opera House, which i s the mother and father of all modern landmark buildings, has come to define not onl y a city, but also an entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concept o f modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of it s creator Jorn Utzon. In addition, the performances which contain the soul of human c ivilization shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all ov er the world.Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but building theater s and sports stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physicall y, but a nation and continent permanentlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatres and sport s stadiums, they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or n ot agree?Government, as the controller of the macroeconomy, usually put large amount of mon ey on building theatres and sports stadiums to stimulate the consumption. Especiall y when globle economy is in recession, stimulation is one of the methods for governm ent to catch the economy‟s fall. However, to my opinion, government should spend more money on medical care and education.。
(完整版)雅思大作文-范文30篇

•经济上,发展中国家的劳动力被剥削,资源被取用,而产品却不能够进人发达国家,国内产业受到外商和外企的冲击;•社会上,外国的产品流人一个国家,会改变人们的生活习惯和购买习惯;年轻人比较喜欢外同产品,比如说食品、衣服、电子产品和娱乐方式;•文化上,本土文化会被削弱,本土语言会受到威胁,文化多样性会逐步损失;•环境上,工业化生产和交通量的加大会增加温室气体的排放;游人的增多会对自然环境构成威胁。
Topic 1: Increasing travels between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries?外来人口的增加有利于文化的交流:•游客或者移民都具备经济利益和价值(commercial interest and economic value);而外同人的停留时间是和东道国的合作密切相关的(The length of stay depends on the cooperation of the host society.);很多当地人因此表现得非常好客和友好,这有助于文化的交流(Many local people are very friendly and hospitable, which promote the cultural communications.);•对其他的文化和人民更为了解(a better understanding of other cultures and other peoples),改变人们对其他民族和文化的态度(alter one's attitudes towards another people or culture);人们因此可以接受不同的文化和价值观(embrace different values and cultures),可以和平共处(create motivation to coexist peacefully), 并促进对"多元文化的理解(promote multi-cultural understanding);•促进文化的融合(promote integration),消除文化障碍(remove cultural barriers), 外来人口的增加导致冲突:•违反当地的习俗会激怒当地人(breach of local customs can irritate the locals);•不同文化的人看待同一事物总有不同的角度(harbour different perceptions),并给予不同的解释(different interpretations),比如对手势、衣服、言行举止有不同的理解;举止不当会引起当地人意想不到的反应(provoke unanticipated responses); •外国游客增多会对当地环境造成压力,甚至破坏环境,而移民增多可能导致工作机会减少,致使竞争更加激烈,这些都有可能引起当地人的反感(cause resentment in local communities).Globalization is a catch-all term that refers to any activity that involves more than one country, for example, travel from one country to another. The dramatic increase in transnational travel in recent years has sparked controversy over the potential impacts of this trend on individual countriesf especially those new member states of globalization. Some people are concerned that the upsurge in new arrivals will prompt local hostility against visitors instead of promoting their understanding on mutual cultural background. This notion should be rejected as one can see many facts in favor of this development between countries.The first reason why international travels would never bring conflict is rooted in the fact that both visitors and locals are economically motivated. International travel opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs are interested not only in the domestic market but also in the oversea market. Foreigners should learn the culture of a country before winning over the local people. In turn, locals should show their hospitality to visitors in exchange for their trust. They share a view that acceptance of each other's cultural background is a necessary condition for cooperation.Understanding a culture has other implications. Differences in social background, cultural values and religious belief might make the discrepancy of foreigners and local inhabitants on some issues indelible; however, the higher interaction, the higher level of communication and understanding. Arabians, for example, used to consider westerners as their foes. Now they have concrete relations with their western allies in many fields. In the initial stage, their divergence seemedinherent but over time, with better mutual understanding, they take the same position on many issues.Undeniably, it is likely that in some resorts, foreign visitors repel the local community with their scant regard for the local environment and conventions when they first arrive. However, it should be noted that most offense is accidental, rather than intentional. Instead, visitors disobey rules and conventions simply because they have no knowledge of them. This situation is expected to be improved with the passing of time when visitors from different countries increase their knowledge of a local culture.According to the above analysis, we can observe that the increase in the international travel should not be taken as the cause of any conflict that arises between two countries. Alternatively, one should recognize its role in improving mutual understanding between two countries.1. catch-all = all-embracing:包罗甚广的;包括一切的2. hostility=enmity=resentment:敌意,怨'恨,愤恨3. rooted in=derived from=based on:基于4. entrepreneur=tycoon=mogul=industrialist:企业家,实业家5. discrepancy=disagreement=difference=divergence:分歧,矛盾6. foe=enemy=rival:敌人,竟争对手7. concrete=tangible=solid:具体的,实际的8. overtime=in due course=sooner or later:最终,早9. resort:胜地;tourist resort:旅游胜地;holiday resort:度假胜地;beach resort:海边度假胜地;scenic spot:景观;place of interest: 旅游景点10. repel=revolt=repulse:使厌恶,憎恶11. scant=limited=scarce:缺乏的,不足的Topic2: When international media (including movies, fashion shows, advertisements and other TV programs) convey the same messages to the global audience, people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity. What is your opinion?媒体信息一致的缺点:•国际媒体(global media)—般掌握在少数几个有实力的机构手中(in the hands of a few, large, powerful organizations);有了媒体的宣传(propaganda)后,西方文化成了主流(domineering force),大规模的、有吸引力的广告(mass seductive advertising )唤起了落后地区人们对物质新的向往(create fresh desires),经济联系增强(strong economic ties),西方产品取代了本地产品,使人们更加向往西方的文化;•文化开始融合在一起(mingle),人们被新的价值观所围绕(bombarded with new values),对自己的文化失去信心和自豪感(confidence and pride),拒绝接受自己的文化传统(rejection of their cultural heritage)转而接受西方的文化习惯(adoption of Western cultural practices);西方媒体削弱了民族的特征(ethnic identity)和社会的凝聚力(social cohesion);因为担心失去观众(a loss of viewers),当地的电视台也开始播放西方的电视节目(television shows),•国际媒体的普遍会降低世界文化的品质和多样性(degrade the quality and diversity of world culture);文化被商业化(commercialized), —些文化产品(cultural goods),如音乐、服装,都变成了商品(commodities in the marketplace)。
雅思大作文范文100篇

雅思大作文范文100篇雅思大作文是雅思考试中最重要的一部分,它占据了整个考试的40%。
因此,对于想要在雅思考试中取得好成绩的考生来说,掌握好雅思大作文的写作技巧和范文是非常重要的。
本文将为大家提供100篇雅思大作文范文,希望能够对大家的雅思备考有所帮助。
社会类1. 社会问题题目:现代社会存在的问题范文:现代社会存在着许多问题,其中最突出的问题之一就是贫富差距。
在许多国家,富人越来越富,而穷人却越来越贫困。
这种现象导致了社会的不公平和不稳定,因为穷人往往无法获得良好的教育和医疗资源,而富人则可以享受更好的生活条件。
另一个现代社会的问题是环境污染。
随着工业化和城市化的发展,许多地区的空气和水质已经受到了严重的污染。
这种污染不仅影响了人们的健康,还对生态系统造成了严重的破坏。
因此,我们需要采取措施来减少污染,保护环境。
最后,现代社会还存在着许多其他的问题,比如犯罪率的上升、社会道德的沦丧等等。
这些问题都需要我们共同努力来解决,以建立一个更加公正、和谐和稳定的社会。
2. 社会进步题目:社会进步的因素范文:社会进步是一个复杂的过程,它受到许多因素的影响。
其中最重要的因素之一是科技的发展。
随着科技的不断进步,我们可以更好地理解世界,更好地解决问题。
比如,现在我们可以通过互联网来获取各种信息,这使得我们的生活更加便利和高效。
另一个促进社会进步的因素是教育。
教育可以提高人们的知识水平和技能,使他们更有能力去创造和改变世界。
因此,许多国家都在加强教育投入,以提高人民的素质和竞争力。
最后,社会进步还需要政治和经济的支持。
政治稳定和经济发展可以为社会进步提供必要的条件和资源。
因此,政府需要采取措施来促进经济发展和社会稳定,以推动社会进步。
教育类3. 教育问题题目:教育问题的解决方法范文:教育问题是一个全球性的问题,它涉及到许多方面,比如教育资源的不均衡、教育质量的下降等等。
为了解决这些问题,我们需要采取以下措施:首先,我们需要加强教育投入,以提高教育资源的均衡性。
雅思英文作文范文10篇

雅思英文作文范文1. 教育话题题目:Some people believe that schools should primarily teach students how to become good citizens, while others believe that the main purpose of schools is to prepare students for the workforce. Discuss both views and give your opinion.In today's rapidly changing world, the role of schools is a subject of debate. Some argue that schools should focus on teaching students how to become responsible citizens, while others emphasize the importance of preparing students for the workforce.Proponents of the first view argue that schools play a crucial role in shaping responsible citizens. They believe that schools should instill values such as empathy, tolerance, and civic engagement. By prioritizing citizenship education, schools can contribute to the development of individuals who are not only skilled in their professions but also actively participate in their communities.On the other hand, advocates for the workforce preparation perspective argue that schools must equip students with the skills and knowledge needed for their future careers. In today's competitive job market, practical skills and qualifications are essential for success. Therefore, schools should prioritize subjects that are directly relevant to the workforce.In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary. Schools should strive to achieve both goals. By providing a well-rounded education that includes citizenship education and workforce preparation, schools can produce well-rounded individuals who are not only skilled professionals but also responsible citizens.2. 社会问题题目:Some people believe that the government should be responsible for providing healthcare for all citizens, while others think that individuals should take responsibility for their healthcare. Discuss both views and give your opinion.The issue of healthcare provision is a topic of ongoing debate. Some argue that the government should be responsible for providing healthcare to all citizens, while others believe that individuals should take responsibility for their healthcare.Supporters of government-funded healthcare argue that it is a fundamental right for all citizens to have access to healthcare services. They contend that a public healthcare system ensures that everyone, regardless of their financial status, can receive medical treatment when needed. This, they argue, promotes equality and social well-being.On the other hand, proponents of individual responsibility for healthcare argue that personal health choices, such as diet and exercise,play a significant role in one's well-being. They believe that individuals should take proactive measures to maintain their health and seek private healthcare options when necessary. This approach, they argue, encourages personal accountability.In my view, a combination of both approaches is ideal. Government-funded healthcare can provide a safety net for those who cannot afford private healthcare, ensuring that basic medical services are accessible to all. However, individuals should also be encouraged to take responsibility for their health through healthy lifestyle choices and preventative measures.3. 环境问题题目:Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual persons to address. In today's world, we should focus more on international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Environmental issues, such as climate change and pollution, have global implications that extend beyond the borders of individual countries. Some argue that addressing these problems requires a greater emphasis on international cooperation rather than relying solely on individual countries and individuals.I strongly agree with the view that international cooperation is essential to effectively tackle environmental problems. Climate change,for example, is a global issue that requires collective action from nations worldwide. The impact of greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and other environmental challenges transcends national boundaries, making it impossible for any single country to address them in isolation.International cooperation can lead to the development of comprehensive strategies and agreements aimed at mitigating environmental problems. The Paris Agreement, for instance, is a testament to the power of global collaboration in addressing climate change.Moreover, international cooperation fosters knowledge sharing and technological advancements. Countries can learn from each other's successes and failures in addressing environmental issues, leading to more effective solutions.In conclusion, the scale and complexity of environmental problems demand international cooperation. While individual countries and individuals have a role to play, it is only through collective global efforts that we can hope to mitigate the impact of these challenges and protect the planet for future generations.4. 科技与社会题目:Some people argue that advances in technology have made our lives more stressful, while others believe that technology has made our lives easier and more convenient. Discuss both views and give your opinion.The impact of technology on our lives is a subject of debate. Some argue that advances in technology have increased stress levels, while others believe that technology has made our lives easier and more convenient.Supporters of the view that technology has increased stress levels point to several factors. They argue that the constant connectivity provided by smartphones and the internet has blurred the boundaries between work and personal life, leading to increased stress. Additionally, the rapid pace of technological change can create anxiety as individuals struggle to keep up with the latest developments.On the other hand, proponents of technology's role in making our lives easier highlight its numerous benefits. They argue that technology has improved communication, access to information, and efficiency in various aspects of life. Tasks that were once time-consuming are now simplified through automation and digital tools.In my opinion, technology has the potential to both increase stress and enhance convenience, depending on how it is used. It is essential forindividuals to strike a balance between leveraging technology for its benefits while also managing its potential negative impacts on stress. Responsible and mindful use of technology can lead to a more convenient and less stressful life.5. 社会变革题目:Some people believe that social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have a positive impact on society, while others argue that they have a negative influence. Discuss both views and give your opinion.The influence of social media platforms on society is a topic of ongoing debate. Some argue that these platforms have a positive impact, while others contend that they have a negative influence.Supporters of the positive impact of social media argue that these platforms facilitate communication and connectivity among individuals worldwide. They provide a space for people to share information, connect with friends and family, and raise awareness about important social issues. Social media has played a crucial role in organizing movements and campaigns for social change.However, critics argue that social media can have a negative influence on society. They point to issues such as cyberbullying, the spread of misinformation, and the negative impact on mental health. Theaddictive nature of social media and the potential for echo chambers where individuals are exposed only to like-minded opinions are also concerns.In my opinion, social media platforms have the potential for both positive and negative impacts, depending on how they are used. It is essential for individuals to use these platforms responsibly, critically evaluate the information they encounter, and be mindful of their online interactions. When used thoughtfully, social media can be a powerful tool for positive social change and connectivity.6. 社会问题题目:Some people believe that the government should regulate the fast-food industry to prevent health problems, while others think this is the responsibility of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.The regulation of the fast-food industry is a topic of debate. Some argue that the government should intervene to prevent health problems, while others believe that individuals should take responsibility for their dietary choices.Proponents of government regulation contend that the fast-food industry has a significant role in contributing to health problems such as obesity and heart disease. They argue that stricter regulations, such aslimiting advertising to children or mandating clearer nutritional information, can help consumers make informed choices and ultimately lead to better public health outcomes.On the other hand, advocates for individual responsibility argue that adults should have the freedom to make their own dietary choices. They believe that educating individuals about nutrition and encouraging healthier eating habits should be the primary focus, rather than imposing government regulations.In my view, a balanced approach is necessary. While individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices, the fast-food industry does have a responsibility to provide clear and accurate information about the nutritional content of their products. Government regulations can help ensure transparency and protect consumers, especially in cases involving children's advertising.7. 环境问题题目:Some people believe that the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Addressing environmental problems, particularly related to carbon emissions and air pollution, is a critical concern. Some argue that raisingthe cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is an effective way to incentivize environmentally friendly behavior.I strongly agree with the view that increasing the cost of fuel can be an effective strategy to combat environmental problems. Higher fuel prices encourage individuals to use public transportation, carpool, or consider alternative transportation options such as electric or hybrid vehicles. This, in turn, reduces the carbon footprint and air pollution associated with traditional gasoline-powered vehicles.Furthermore, the additional revenue generated from higher fuel prices can be reinvested in the development of cleaner and more sustainable transportation infrastructure, such as improved public transit systems and bike lanes.In conclusion, increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles can serve as a powerful incentive for individuals to adopt more environmentally friendly transportation choices. This measure not only addresses environmental problems but also promotes sustainable and responsible behavior.8. 科技与社会题目:Some people argue that the widespread use of smartphones and social media has led to a decline in face-to-face social interactions. Do you agree or disagree?The impact of smartphones and social media on face-to-face social interactions is a matter of ongoing debate. Some argue that these technologies have led to a decline in such interactions, while others disagree.I agree with the view that the widespread use of smartphones and social media has, to some extent, led to a decline in face-to-face social interactions. Many people are now more engaged in their digital lives, constantly checking their phones for messages, updates, and social media notifications. This can reduce the quality and quantity of in-person interactions.Moreover, the convenience of virtual communication can lead to a preference for online interactions over face-to-face conversations. People may choose to communicate via text or social media rather than meeting in person, which can contribute to a decline in direct human contact.However, it's essential to recognize that technology's impact on social interactions is complex and multifaceted. While there are challenges associated with smartphone use, these devices also enable connections with people across long distances and can enhance social interactions in various ways. The key is to strike a balance between digital and in-person communication to maintain healthy social relationships.9. 教育话题题目:Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year, while others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year. Discuss both views and give your opinion.The structure of school vacations is a topic of discussion. Some argue that students should have one long vacation each year, while others believe that several short vacations throughout the year are more beneficial.Proponents of one long vacation argue that it provides students with an extended period for relaxation and the opportunity to engage in meaningful activities, such as travel or internships. They contend that a lengthy break allows students to recharge and return to school with renewed enthusiasm.On the other hand, advocates for several short vacations believe that shorter breaks distributed throughout the year help maintain continuity in learning. They argue that students are less likely to experience "summer learning loss" and can better retain knowledge when they have regular breaks for rest and rejuvenation.In my opinion, a combination of both approaches can be beneficial. Having one long vacation each year can provide students with an extended break for exploration and relaxation. However, incorporatingshorter breaks throughout the academic year can help students maintain focus and prevent burnout. The key is to strike a balance that ensures students have ample opportunities for both learning and leisure.10. 社会变革题目:Some people argue that advancements in automation and artificial intelligence will lead to widespread job loss and unemployment. Do you agree or disagree?The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on employment is a topic of concern and debate. Some argue that these advancements will result in widespread job loss and unemployment, while others disagree.I believe that while automation and AI will indeed reshape the job market, they may not necessarily lead to widespread job loss and unemployment. Automation has the potential to eliminate certain routine and repetitive tasks, but it also creates opportunities for new types of jobs and industries.For example, as automation takes over routine tasks, it frees up human workers to focus on more creative and complex aspects of their jobs. Additionally, the development and maintenance of automation systems and AI technologies require skilled workers, leading to the creation of jobs in those fields.Moreover, automation and AI have the potential to improve productivity and efficiency in various industries, which can lead to economic growth and the creation of new businesses and jobs.In conclusion, while advancements in automation and artificial intelligence will undoubtedly impact the job market, the overall effect may not necessarily be widespread job loss and unemployment. Adaptation, reskilling, and a focus on emerging industries are essential for individuals and economies to thrive in the changing landscape of work.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
some people claim that the disadvantages of the car are more than t he advantages, do you agree or disagree?范文1the birth of cars have made an enormous change to our life.in the past,we travel from one place to another only by foot,nowaday,cars can do it .its goes withour saying that the invention of cars br ing great benefit to all of us.but as proverb goes:no garden withou t weeds.car is not exception.owing a car has a lot of advantages.for one thing,car provide us th e most convient way of transportation.we can get around freely withou t spenting a lot of time.emotionally,i always found driving is so ex citing.for another,its the comfortable to drive a car.In winter.driver s always can stay warm and dry even in rainy whether,in addition,dri vers are usually safe in their cars when they are out at night.Cars bring the human merits,their side-effects gradually come to the surface.firstly,to run a car need a lot of oil,which is getting l ess and less.the increasing number of cars contribute the lacking of energy.secondlly,as more and more cars are used,the traffic ecpeci ally in big cities is getting heaver and heavier,which lead to the serious social problem--traffic jam.in addition,the inceasing numbers of cars ,which excaust sent a huge quantities of carbon monoxide into atmosphere.it make the air of cities unbreathabe,it strip peop le contact with frensh air.therefore, new energy should be explored to replace the oil so that our envionmental pollution can be avioded .and the strick law shou ld be issued to keep the numbers of cars under control.thus,our heav ier traffic can be solluted!范文2Private cars vs Public trafficAs traffic problems become more and more serious in many cities of developed and developing countries, their governments have to tryh ard and loads of money and energy have been spent to deal with the m.Firstly, it is not efficient for the commuters to use their private cars to and back from their workplaces. Occasionally we can see they have to sit on the wheels wasting time and fuel in a heavy tr affic jam. At the same time, through burning the fossil fuels, gree n house gas CO2, CO1, acid rain gas SO2, fumes and dusts are bein g released into the atmosphere, all of which heavily overload the en vironment. Thirdly, with the increase of private cars, the road traff ic accidentsare also rise dramatically. For example, in a city with 5000 car s, there will be at least 250 accidents happening everyday, which al so burden the public healthy services.On the contrary, expected public traffic may be an ideal solution t o these problems. For example city buses and railways are widely use d or being constructed by many cities. People can take buses easil y, which can be found every 10 minutes or less in the peak time. Actually, Nottingham Transport Company is building its own light r ailway in the city, which is announced by the speak man of the com pany, “It will be completed in the next year, the tickets will be very competitive and at the same time the travel will be very sa fe and comfortable.”On the other hand, public traffic had its own disadvantages. Usually it cannot provide door-to-door service. It is inconvenient to go s hopping by public vehicles. Sometimes you must wait a long time for the train. And quite a lot of people prefer to enjoy driving.In conclusion, developing the public traffic is a useful approach to deal with these difficulties. One possible way, if not the best, is to taxi private cars heavily and use these revenues to provid e citizens cheaper public traffic services.范文3With the development of science and technology, the cars have alread y become the important component in our daily life gradually. Cars m ake our life convenient and swift. However, too many cars have cause d very serious social problems. Some people claim that the disadvanta ges of car are more than the advantages. I doubt whether the argume nt can bear much analysis.Since one century [ago], the auto industry has [been] developed at f ull speed worldwide, and has brought the enormous progresses to our life. For example, the car is the most convenient tool of transpo rtation. We can [be] on and off duty by car every day, we can go to travel by car on the vacation, we can utilize the cars to de al with some emergency too. The car [is] playing an important role in our daily life. They make our rhythm of life faster and faste r, make our business become more and more efficient.On the other hand, the development of the automobile has brought a lot of infant industry to people, Give people countless employme nt opportunities too. Such as, manufacturing industry, repairing indust ry and maintaining industry. We are enjoying the convenience that th e cars bring to us; at the same time we can utilize the auto indu stry to support ourselves.However, we can not ignore that too many cars cause enormous social problems, for example, traffic jam, air pol lution, traffic accident, to which we have to find a solution.In a word, the cars have brought enormous change to our life; the advantages are far more than the disadvantages. We should recognize the merit of the cars, and do our best to solve the problems. If so, our life will be brighter.Version 00106范文1Nowhere in the world has the issue of tobacco been so much debated as inour society. Nowadays, tobacco is more harmful than drug to people’shealth, therefore many people think that smoking is legal that is a direct andprimary reason to induce this kind of problem. The above point i s certainlytrue; this essay will outline three reasons.The main reason is that tobacco is a silent killer to smokers. Toba cco isknown to be the probable cause of some 25 different diseases, and f or some,such as lung cancer, bronchitis and emphysema, it is the main caus e.According to a WHO report four million people die yearly from tobacc o-related diseases, that is one death every eight seconds. Tobacco is signif icantlybecoming a greater cause of death and disability than any other sing le cause.Another reason is that more and more young people are under 18 year s old who smoke cigarette have been blinded by the deceit of tobacc onists. Tobacco among adolescents remains stubbornly persistent. Smokin g among adolescents rose in the 1990s in several developed countrie s,such as China,Vietnam and Thailand . While new markets are bein g opened by the tobacco industry actions, old markets have not been closed. Tobacco is a global threat.Last but not the least reason is the increase in cigarette smugglin g. Becauseof tobacco smuggling, the legal retailing and distribution systems a re badlyaffected, and faced with increased lawlessness and heavy tax losses. This behavior severely affects the economy.In conclusion, the tobacco should be considered illegal. Perhaps a pa ck ofcigarettes is less harmful than another drug, but tobacco is actually thebiggest killer of all the drugs.=================================================范文2Advertisements of tobacco and those of “smoking is harmful”are ofte n seentogether. But there has been an on-going argument about whether or nottobacco should be forbidden and made illegal. I have always believe d thatsmoking should be illegal for the following reasons.First, smoking does great harm to human health and causes many disea ses.It is reported that more than 70% of lung cancer sufferers are smok ers, andthe average life-span of smokers is seven years less than that o f non-smokers. Moreover, it hurts not only smokers, but also the ones arou nd thesmokers. Many researchers claim that breathing “second-hand smoke”ma ybe even more harmful than smoking.Second, many social problems and disasters can be attributed to smoki ng.For instance, many wives cannot bear their husbands’smoking all th e time,which causes many quarrels, or even divorces. Furthermore, the bigge st firedisaster in China, the Daxinganling fire disaster, was caused by a burningcigarette end, and the cost of the resulting loss was unimaginable. Last, smoking tobaccos is a main source of air pollution.A magazine said thatfor every cigarette smoked each day,a whole tree is needed to clea n the air.In other words, smoking one less cigar every day equals planting a tree. Itis a brilliant contribution to the earth we are living on.In a word, all the above demonstrate that smoking harms yourselves a s wellas your neighbors, pollutes the air we ourselves are breathing, an d evenagitates the social peace. So, in my opinion, tobacco should be stri ctlyforbidden, and smoking should be made illegal.范文3there has long been controversy over the legality and apparent accept ance of tobacco in society .some hold that cigarettes and other toba cco containing products should be banned, that is, treated as narcoti cs.personally,i agree with this point of view for the following reaso ns:although cigarettes do not offer as intense an effect as drugs like heroin and cocaine,they rank higher in the level of dependence it creates in the user.thousands of smokers try to rid themselves of cigarettes but cannot,because of the physiological dependence they d eveloped,chiefly imputable to its chemical nicotine.this explains why s mokers continue their habit despite the numerous health warnings. furt hermore,medical science has now proved beyond a doubt that smoking ki lls.with all the other causes of preventable deaths such as alcohol,i llegal drugs,aids,suicide,road accidents,fire,and guns,cigarettes still ac count for more preventable deaths than all of those combined.more disturbingly,whilst the use of heroin is dangerous solely to th e users,the use of tobacco endangers those who are in their vicinity as well. this phenomenon, known as passive smoking, nulls the coun ter-argument that putting one's own health at risk through smoking sh ould be up to one's own individual choice.reports have shown that th e amount of second-hand smoke inhaled by a typical nonsmoker is equi valent to one cigarette smoked per day,and what is more,passive smoki ng can increase a nonsmoker's chance of getting cancer by ten to th irty two per cent.there are those who will say that the black market created by outla wing tobacco will produce deadlier cigarettes because the product stan dards of the bootleggers are not as high.however,we should all bear in mind that legal cigarettes cause roughly four hundred thousand deaths a year.it is hard to imagine the limiteddistribution provided by the criminal underworld could compete with this tragic figure.to sum up, the harm visited upon our society by tobacco usage is s ubstantial.there will be no solution other than to control tobacco mu ch in the same way that the government now controls drugs which cou ld allow people to remain attentive to the seriousness of the effect s of these substances,and hopefully to prohibit their usage.范文4Apparently, it would seem that tobacco is totally different substance from drugs, and it can be used freedom by public. In fact, howev er, our authority should make tobacco illegal as well as drugs, and using of tobacco should be controlled strictly.Tobacco only can be used for research and medical purpose. As far a s I am concerned, as a kind of dope, tobacco has been widely used to help patients alleviate their pain in surgery. At the same tim e, ordinary people should not be allowed to access it legally for t wo main reasons.Among countless factors which influence my inclination, there is a mo st conspicuous one: it is harmful that smokers addict to tobacco. Ma ny decades ago, scientists have already found that there is a defini te link between smoking and bronchial troubles, cardiac disease and l ung cancer. More seriously, it not only has negative influence for s mokers, but others living or working in same surrounding, even the n ext generation of a smoking pregnant women may be harmed by so-calle d “second hand smoking”. Research shows that sometimes “second hand s moking”is more dangerous than smoking directly, because, at least s mokers can get the protection from filter tips to some extent. Thu s, compared to the hazard of drugs, tobacco can involve more other innocent people and harm their health unknowingly.The second aspect relates to the problem that our natural resources and money are wasted senselessly during the course of planting, tr ansporting and manufacturing tobacco. In light of a statistics, China consumes nearly 1,000 tons of wood fibers to produce cigarettes an nually. Besides, the investment absorbed by tobacco manufacturers ever y year, is enough to solve all financial troubles that higher educat ion have to face. Obviously, if tobacco is banned by our government s, it means that considerable money will be saved.In summary, judging from all the evidence offered, we may safely arr ive at the conclusion that tobacco should be forbidden as well as drugs except for a few special purposes, such as research and medicin e.补充With the development of society, our life and working pressure are g reater and greater. In this way, a lot of people have become smoker s. Tobacco, as a kind of drugs, prevails in the society. Some peopl e hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom be use, bu t others, in contrast, deem it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases, lun g cancer, and the immune system diseases. These diseases are all man kind's healthy enemies. The statistics have showed that people who di e of the lung cancer, over 90% are smokers. In these smokers, 85% are chain smoker. So, obviously, there is enormous danger to the human health in smoking.In addition, smoking not only dangerous to smoker, but also do har m to people at smoker's side. The tobacco contains a large number o f noxious substances, such as nicotine. Just as a famous physician s ays, smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronically.However, the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve, within sho rt time. People, especially, who have heavy working pressure, are pro ne to produce sense of relying on to cigarette. Moreover, as everyon e knows, a lot of countries impose the heavy taxation to tobacco ma nufacturer and seller, thus, if the tobacco business is considered a s the illegal activities, the revenues of the country will be reduce d correspondingly.In a word, the danger to people of cigarette is obvious. Though it can help us flee away from pressure, this to use health as cos t. Our government should forbid the production of the tobacco, make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.With the development of society, our life and working pressure are [getting] greater and greater.In this way, a lot of people have become smokers. Tobacco, as a ki nd of drugs, prevails in the society. Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom [to] be [used, but others, i n contrast, deem [that] it should be made [as] illegal as the same way as other drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases, lun g cancer, and the immune system diseases. [all of these diseases ar e enemies of mankind's healthy] . The statistics have showed that pe ople who die of the lung cancer, over 90%, are smokers. [Among] these smokers, 85% are chain smokers. So, obviously, there is enormous danger to the human health in smoking.In addition, smoking not only dangerous to smokers, but also [does] harm to people at smoker's side. The tobacco contains a large nu mber of noxious substances, such as nicotine. Just as a famous physi cian says, smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronically. However,the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve, within short tim e. People, especially, who have heavy working pressure, are prone to produce sense of relying on to cigarette. Moreover, as everyone kn ows, a lot of countries impose the heavy taxation to tobacco manufac turer and seller, thus, if the tobacco business is considered as th e illegal activities, the revenues of the country will be reduced co rrespondingly.To sum up, the danger to people of cigarette is obvious. Though it can help us flee away from pressure, this to use health as cos t. Our government should forbid the production of the tobacco, make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.Although it is a freedom to use tobacco{烟草} while some people thin k it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs. To wh at extent do you agree or disagree?What’s your opinion?A:Tobacco should be made illegal, I agree with this idea personally. I hope most drugs can be made illegal, because, as far as I kn ow, they are bad to our health. However, currently most countries st ill keep it free to use tobacco, and this situation seems to be ve ry hard to change in a short time.From my own experience, using tobacco is not a good thing, especiall y using is for a long time. It will lead to many kinds of disease s, more importantly, many of them are fatale. One of my friends die d from using too much tobacco, and it is believed there are many m ore people like this. The other thing that I am concerned of is, i f a country doesn’t make using tobacco illegal, many young people w ill have a chance to use it, i.e. students. It is very dangerous, because if someone gets addicted to this when he is very youn g, he will then almost surely have a big health problem when he i s old.I am happy to see that, although it is free to use tobacco in man y countries, most of those countries still somehow try not to encour age people using it. For example, tobacco advertisement is banned in many countries, and for many countries, smoking is banned in publi c places. Overall, most countries are trying to stop the use of tob acco, though it will take sometime. In my opinion, it is essential to limit the use of tobacco, and I hope everyone doesn’t use.Version 00108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theat ersand sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care an deducation. Agree or not agree?=================================================范文1Nowadays,the gap between the city and the countryside becomes more and mor e overt, which arouses colossal concerns. To understand the solutio n, let’s take a closer look at the causes of the gap at first. The main reason of the gap is the unequal investment between city a nd rural area. China is a typical example. While more and more mone y is being invested to the coastal areas and big cities, such as B eijing and Shanghai, the lack of investment barriers greatly the soci ety development of rural area and western regionsThe low education level partly sharps the gap. There is no doubt th at the prime force of productivity is education. However, because of poverty, thousands of people go to work without graduating from pr imary school. The poorer, the few children go to school. This bad c ycle finally leads to the dream of rich becoming a dream that is h ard to realize.Moreover, the rural area is short of people with high quality. A su rvey proved that most of university students, whether they come fro m city or countryside, choose big cities instead of poor areas to w ork. The rural area can neither adept talent man nor attract talen t man. No wonder the gap is increasing largely.Hence, The government ought to knock itself out to decrease the ga p as soon as possible. First, balance the investment between city an d rural area. In addition, the education level should be improved, e specially pay attention on raising high quality people. Besides, let more people realize the latent capacity of rural area in order t o attract talent and investment. The set up of CCTV channel12-wester n region channel is a good example.Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step, can t he gap between the cities and the countryside be bridged.范文2Nowadays, many people argue against the government putting money on building theaters and sports stadiums. They have claimed that medical careand education would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I believe it is worth building more theaters and arenas. First, stadiums and arenas provide ideal places for people to have p hysicalexercises and entertainment. After a whole week’s hardworking, people canenjoy a wonderful football game in the weekend, and refresh themselve swith a good relaxation there. Moreover, the physical exercises are go od forpeople’s health, which will ease the pressure of medical care. Second, theaters and museums can be used as base areas of culture a nd history education. The British Museum, which is the largest one in the world,provides visitors with knowledge about the world culture and the art s. Thevisitors to the museum are all overwhelmed by the magnificence of th ecultural and historical displays featuring mankind’s achievements. In a ddition, the performances shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich t he lives of citizens. People can enjoy ballet, symphony, and Peking Opera in a theater,which contain the soul of Chinese and western cultures.Third, running theaters and stadiums can earn much money.And this amo untof money can do great contribution in other fields, including medic al care,and education. After winning the Olympic 2008,Beijing made a plan t o spend160 billion RMB building an Olympic Village. This will surely attra ct manysports fans to China, which would be much rewarded, not only in eco nomybut the whole society.You can tell form my commentary above,since building theaters and sta diumsbenefit not only individuals but also the state, it is very worth y of theseexpenses.And the government should speed up the pace of the construct ions.范文3An argument often heard these days is that whether or not the gover nment should put money on building theaters and stadiums. Some believ e that instead of spending money on this area, Medical care and edu cation, both of which are basic developing factors of one country sh ould be spent more money on. After weighting the pros and cons, I disagree with this opinion.Firstly, theaters and stadiums are best choice for people relaxing. M ost of workers, especially white collar who often feel nervous after one day’s hard work, need to relax both mentally and physicall y. Compared with staying at home, it is much better way to stay i n comfortable theater and listen to a wonderful concert.In addition, going to theaters and stadiums affect the same effec t as education and medical care. Having more chances to go to theat ers can help them mold character. There is no better way to keep h ealthy than doing proper sports in the daily. In this way, the cult ure and health will be improved greatly, which plays the same role of education and medical care.Moreover, theaters and stadiums are basis essential facilities to a d eveloped city. Take holding an Olympic games as an example, it is n o doubt it will take millions of money to build stadiums. Why the winner country is proud of that. Because this is a confirmationg iven by whole world.Of course I don’t mean that the more theaters and stadiums, the be tter society will be, after all, nothing can take the important place of medical care and education.In summary, the key point is to keep both of this two part develop ing. Only in this way, can all people live better in future.V108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theat ers and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical car e and education. Agree or not agree?Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to pu t too much money on building theaters and sports stadiums. They main tain that medical care and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, Iadvocate building more theaters and arenas. Numerous circumstances le ad to the worth of building theaters and arenas, but here are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums pr ovide ideal places for people to build up a world of relaxation. Af ter five days of hardworking, people can refresh themselves by takin g physical exercises and enjoining a football game there. Meanwhile, exercises is to health what water is to fish. The physical exerc ises can benefit people’s health, which will surely ease the pressur e of medical care. Moreover, it provides people a good opportunity t o enter into communion with each other, which will benefit people’s mental health.Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “social classroom”of culture and history educatio n. The Sydney Opera House, which is the mother and father of all m odern landmark buildings, has come to define not only a city, but a lso an entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concep t of modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visito rs with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon. In addition, the perform ances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the thea ters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over th e world.Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but b uilding theaters and sports stadiums will benefit not only the indivi dual both mentally and physically, but a nation and continent permane ntlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theat ers and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical car e and education. Agree or not agree?Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to pu t too much money on building theaters and sports stadiums. They main tain that medical care and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate building more theaters and arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building t heaters and arenas, but here are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums pr ovide ideal places for people to build up a world of relaxation. Af ter five days of hardworking, people can refresh themselves by takin g physical exercises and enjoining a football game there. Meanwhile, exercises is to health what water is to fish. The physical exerc ises can benefit people’s health, which will surely ease the pressur e of medical care. Moreover, it provides people a good opportunity t o enter into communion with each other, which will benefit people’s mental health.Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “social classroom”of culture and history educatio n. The Sydney Opera House, which is the mother and father of all m odern landmark buildings, has come to define not only a city, but a lso an entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concep t of modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visito rs with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon. In addition, the perform ances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the thea ters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over th e world.Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but b uilding theaters and sports stadiums will benefit not only the indivi dual both mentally and physically, but a nation and continent permane ntlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theat res and sports stadiums, they should spend more money on medical car e and education. Agree or not agree?Government, as the controller of the macroeconomy, usually put large amount of money on building theatres and sports stadiums to stimul ate the consumption. Especially when globle economy is in recessio n, stimulation is one of the methods for government to catch the ec onomy’s fall. However, to my opinion, government should spend more money on medical care and education.For men, health and education are the basic elements for developmen t. We often say health is the best wealth. Without health, even if you are a millionaire you will not enjoy your life. The soc iety needs more medical care to ensure people to live happily and c reate more fortune. This is a physical base for development of soc iety. The spiritual foundation should be obtained from education. Only with more knowledge, can we catch up with the improvemen t of economy, society and technology. We need healthy people and brilliant minds to change our world into a better one. Theatre s and sports stadiums are signs for higher standard of living. Com pared with the basic development factors, they are minor.Insufficiency in medical care and education will impose great stress on poor people and produce unstable factors for society. If gove rnment invested too much on recreational places, it has to lessen the expenditure on medical care and education since the total amount of distributable money will not be changed. Such action will do lit。