2012 Association Between Low Colonic Short-Chain Fatty Acids and High
2012年考研英语阅读理解及答案解析8
2012年考研英语阅读理解及答案解析8难句分析:难句1 Sad to say, this project has turned out to be mostly lowlevel findings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, combined with lots of headscratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers really want.[分析]此句主语是this project,谓语是has turned out to be,findings为宾语,mostly lowlevel是宾语的定语修饰成分,about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes是宾语的补语成分。
combined with lots of headscratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers really want是过去分词引导的伴随状语,其中aboutwhat in the world /kcnet1480/ those readers really want是puzzlement的补语。
[译文]遗憾的是,这次新闻机构可信度调查计划结果只获得了一些肤浅的发现,诸如新闻报道中的事实错误,拼写或语法错误,和这些低层次发现交织在一起的还有许多令人挠头的困惑,譬如读者到底想读些什么。
难句2 There exists a social and cultural disconnect between journalists and their readers, which helps explain why the “standard templates” of the newsroom seem alien to many readers.[分析]此句的结构主句是一个there加系动词的用法。
201212cet6真题及答案详解
201212cet6真题及答案详解2012年12月英语六级真题及答案详解Part I Writing (30 minutes)Directions:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write an essay entitled Man and Computer by commenting on the saying, “The real danger is not th at the computer will begin to think like man, but that man will begin to think like the computer.” You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.Man and ComputerPart II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning)(15 minutes)Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on A nswer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.Thirst grows for living unpluggedMore people are taking breaks from the connected life amid the stillness and quiet of retreats like the Jesuit Center in Wernersville, Pennsylvania.About a year ago, I flew to Singapore to join the writer Malcolm Gladwell, the fashion designer Marc Ecko and the graphic designer Stefan Sagmeister in addressing a group of advertising people on “Marketing to the Child of Tomorrow.” Soon after I arrived, the chief executive of the agency that had invited us took me aside. What he was most interested in, he began, was stillness and quiet.A few months later, I read an interview with the well-known cutting-edge designer Philippe Starck.What allowed him to remain so consistently ah ead of the curve? “I never read any magazines or watch TV,” he said, perhaps with a little exaggeration. “Nor do I go to cocktail parties, dinners or anything like that.” He lived outside conventional ideas, he implied, because “I live alone mostly, in the middle of nowhere.”Around the same time, I noticed that those who part with $2,285 a night to stay in a cliff-top room at the Post Ranch Inn in Big Sur, California, pay partly for the privilege of not having a TV in their rooms; the future of travel, I’m reliably told, lies in “black-hole resorts,” which charge high prices precisely because you can’t get online in th eir rooms.Has it really come to this?The more ways we have to connect, the more many of us seem desperate to unplug. Internet rescue camps in South Korea and China try to save kids addicted to the screen.Writer friends of mine pay good money to get the Freedom software that enables them to disable the very Internet connections that seemed so emancipating not long ago. Even Intel experimented in 2007 with conferring four uninterrupted hours of quiet time (no phone ore-mail) every Tuesday morning on 300 engineers and managers. Workers were not allowed to use the phone or send e-mail, but simply had the chance to clear their heads and to hear themselves think.The average American spends at least eight and a half hours a day in front of a screen, Nicholas Carr notes in his book The Shallows. The average American teenager sends or receives 75 text messages a day, though one girl managed to handle an average of 10,000 every 24 hours for a month.Since luxury is a function of scarcity, the children of tomorrow will long for nothing more than intervals of freedom from all the blinking machines, streaming videos and scrolling headlines that leave them feeling empty and too full all at once.The urgency of slowing down—to find the time and space to think—is nothing new, of course, and wiser souls have always reminded us that the more attention we pay to the moment, the less time and energy we have to pl ace it in some larger context. “Distraction is the only thing that consoles us for our miseries,” the French philosopher Blaise Pascal wrote in the 17th century, “and yet it is itself the greatest of our miseries.” He also famously remarked that all of man’s problems come from his inability to sit quietly in a room alone.快来下载吧When telegraphs and trains brought in the idea that convenience was more important than content, Henry David Thoreau reminded us that “the man whose horse trots (奔跑), a mile in a minute does not carry the most important messages.”Marshall McLuhan, who came closer than most to seeing what was co ming, warned, “When things come at you very fast, naturally you lose touch with yourself.”We have more and more ways to communicate, but less and less to say. Partly because we are so busy communicating. And we are rushing to meet so many deadlines that we hardly register that what we need most are lifelines.So what to do? More and more people I know seem to be turning to yoga,or meditation (沉思), or tai chi (太极);these aren’t New Age fads (时尚的事物) so much as ways to connect with what could be called the wisdom of old age. Two friends of mine observe an“Internet sabbath (安息日)” every week, turning off their online connections from Friday night t o Monday morning. Other friends take walks and “forget” their cellphones at home.A series of tests in recent years has shown, Mr. Carr points out, that after spending time in quiet rural settings, subjects “exhibit greater attentiveness, stronger memory a nd generally improved cognition. Their brains become both calmer and sharper.” More thanthat, empathy (同感,共鸣),as well as deep thought, depends (as neuroscientists like Antonio Damasio have found) on neural processes that are “inherently slow.”I turn to eccentric measures to try to keep my mind sober and ensure that I have time to do nothing at all (which is the only time when I can see what I should be doing the rest of the time).I have yet to use a cellphone and I have never Tweeted or entered Facebook.I try not to go online till my day’s writing is finished, and I moved from Manhattan to rural Japan in part so I could more easily survive for long stretches entirely on foot.None of this is a matter of asceticism (苦行主义);it is just pure selfishness. Nothing makes me feel better than being in one place, absorbed in a book, a conversation, or music. It is actually something deeper than mere happiness: it is joy, which the monk (僧侣) David Steindl-Rast describes as “that kind of happiness that doesn’t depend on what happens.”It is vital, of course, to stay in touch with the world. But it is only by having some distance from the world that you can see it whole, and understand what you should be doing with it.For more than 20 years, therefore, I have been going several times a year—often for no longer than three days—to a Benedictine hermitage (修道院),40 minutes down the road, as ithappens, from the Post Ranch Inn. I don’t attend services when I am there, and I have never meditated, there or anywhere; I just take walks and read and lose myself in the stillness, recalling that it is only by stepping briefly away from my wife and bosses and friends that I will have anything useful to bring to them. The last time I was in the hermitage, three months ago, I happened to meet with a youngish-looking man with a 3-year-old boy around his shoulders.“You’re Pico, aren’t you?” the man said, and introduced himself as Larry; we had met, I gathered, 19 years before, when he had been living in the hermitage as an assistant to one of the monks.“What are you doing now?” I asked.We smiled. No words were necessary.“I try to bring my kids here as often as I can,” he went on. The child of tomorrow, I realized, may actually be ahead of us, in terms of sensing not what is new, but what is essential.1. What is special about the Post Ranch Inn?A) Its rooms are well furnished but dimly lit.B) It makes guests feel like falling into a black hole.C) There is no access to television in its rooms.D) It provides all the luxuries its guests can think of.2. What does the author say the children of tomorrow will need most?A) Convenience and comfort in everyday life.B) Time away from all electronic gadgets.C) More activities to fill in their leisure time.D) Greater chances for individual development.快来下载吧3. What does the French philosopher Blaise Pascal say aboutdistraction?A) It leads us to lots of mistakes.B) It renders us unable to concentrate.C) It helps release our excess energy.D) It is our greatest misery in life.4. According to Marshall McLuhan, what will happen if things come at us very fast?A) We will not know what to do with our own lives.B) We will be busy receiving and sending messages.C) We will find it difficult to meet our deadlines.D) We will not notice what is going on around us.5. What does the author say about yoga, meditation and tai chi?A) They help people understand ancient wisdom.B) They contribute to physical and mental health.C) They are ways to communicate with nature.D) They keep people from various distractions.6. What is neuroscientist Antonio Damasio’s finding?A) Quiet rural settings contribute a lot to long life.B) One’s brain becomes sharp when it is activated.C) Eccentric measures are needed to keep one’s mind sober.D) When people think deeply, their neural processes are slow.7. The author moved from Manhattan to rural Japan partly because he could _______.A) stay away from the noise of the big city.B) live without modern transportation.C) enjoy the beautiful view of the countryside.D) practice asceticism in a local hermitage8. In order to see the world whole, the author thinks it necessary to __________.9. The author takes walks and reads and loses himself in the stillness of the hermitage so thathe can bring his wife and bosses and friends ___________.10. The youngish-looking man takes his little boy to the hermitage frequently so that when hegrows up he will know __________.Part III Listening Comprehension (35 minutes)Section ADirections: In this section, you will hear 8 short conversations and 2 long conversations. Atthe end of each conversation, one or more questions will be asked about what was said. Boththe conversation and the questions will be spoken only once. After each question there will bea pause. During the pause, you must read the four choices marked A), B), C) and D), anddecide which is the best answer. Then mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 witha single line through the centre.11. A) Ask his boss for a lighter schedule.B) Trade places with someone else.C) Accept the extra work willingly.D) Look for a more suitable job.12. A) It is unusual for his wife to be at home now.B) He is uncertain where his wife is at the moment.快来下载吧C) It is strange for his wife to call him at work.D) He does not believe what the woman has told him.13. A) The man is going to send out the memo tomorrow.B) The man will drive the woman to the station.C) The speakers are traveling by train tomorrow morning.D) The woman is concerned with the man’s health.14. A) The suite booked was for a different date.B) The room booked was on a different floor.C) The room booked was not spacious enough.D) A suite was booked instead of a double room.15. A) The reason for low profits.B) The company’s sales policy.C) The fierce competition they face.D) The lack of effective promotion.16. A) Go and get the groceries at once.B) Manage with what they have.C) Do some shopping on their way home.D) Have the groceries delivered to them.17. A) The hot weather in summer.B) The problem with the air conditioner.C) The ridiculous rules of the office.D) The atmosphere in the office.18. A) Set a new stone in her ring.B) Find the priceless jewel she lost.C) Buy a ring with precious diamond.D) Shop on Oxford Street for a decent gift.Questions 19 to 22 are based on the conversation you have just heard.19. A) Damaging public facilities.B) Destroying urban wildlife.C) Organising rallies in the park.D) Hurting baby animals in the zoo.20. A) He had bribed the park keepers to keep quiet.B) People had differing opinions about his behaviour.C) The serious consequences of his doings were not fully realised.D) His behaviour was thought to have resulted from mental illness.21. A) Brutal.快来下载吧B) Justifiable.C) Too harsh.D) Well-deserved.22. A) Encouraging others to follow his wrong-doing.B) Stealing endangered animals from the zoo.C) Organising people against the authorities.D) Attacking the park keepers in broad daylight.Questions 23 to 25 are based on the conversation you have just heard.23. A) She has already left school.B) She works for the handicapped.C) She is fond of practical courses.D) She is good at foreign languages.24. A) He is interested in science courses.B) He attends a boarding school.C) He speaks French and German.D) He is the brightest of her three kids.25. A) Comprehensive schools do not offer quality education.B) Parents decide what schools their children are to attend.C) Public schools are usually bigger in size than private schools.D) Children from low income families can’t really choose schools.Section BDirections: In this section, you will hear 3 short passages. At the end of each passage, youwill hear some questions. Both the passage and the questions will be spoken only once. Afteryou hear a question, you must choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). Then mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through thecentre.Passage OneQuestions 26 to 29 are based on the passage you have just heard.26. A) Encourage the students to do creative thinking.B) Help the students to develop communication skills.C) Cultivate the students’ ability to inspire employees.D) Focus on teaching the various functions of business.27. A) His teaching career at the Harvard Business School.B) His personal involvement in business management.C) His presidency at college and experience overseas.D) His education and professorship at Babson College.快来下载吧28. A) Development of their raw brain power.B) Exposure to the liberal arts and humanities.C) Improvement of their ability in capital management.D) Knowledge of up-to-date information technology.29. A) Reports on business and government corruption.B) His contact with government and business circles.C) Discoveries of cheating among MBA students.D) The increasing influence of the mass media.Passage TwoQuestions 30 to 32 are based on the passage you have just heard.30. A) They have better options for their kids than colleges.B) The unreasonably high tuition is beyond their means.C) The quality of higher education may not be worth the tuition.D) They think that their kids should pay for their own education.31. A) They do too many extracurricular activities.B) They tend to select less demanding courses.C) They take part-time jobs to support themselves.D) They think few of the courses worth studying.32. A) Its samples are not representative enough.B) Its significance should not be underestimated.C) Its findings come as a surprise to many parents.D) Its criteria for academic progress are questionable.Passage ThreeQuestions 33 to 35 are based on the passage you have just heard.33. A) A newly married couple.B) A business acquaintance.C) Someone good at cooking.D) Someone you barely know.34. A) Obtain necessary information about your guests.B) Collect a couple of unusual or exotic recipes.C) Buy the best meat and the freshest fruit.D) Try to improve your cooking skills.35. A) Losing weight.B) Entertaining guests.C) Making friends.D) Cooking meals.快来下载吧Section CDirections: In this section, you will hear a passage three times. When the passage is read for the first time, you should listen carefully for its general idea. When the passage is read for the second time, you are required to fill in the blanks numbered from 36 to 43 with the exact words you have just heard. For blanks numbered from 44 to 46 you are required to fill in the missing information. For these blanks, you can either use the exact words you have just heard or write down the main points in your own words. Finally, when the passage is readfor the third time, you should check what you have written.People with disabilities comprise a large but diverse segment of the population. It is (36) ______ that over 35 million Americans have physical, mental, or other disabilities. (37)______ half of these disabilities are “developmental,” i.e., they occur prior to the individual’s twenty-second birthday, often from (38) ______ conditions, and are severe enough to affect three or more areas of development, such as (39) ______, communication and employment. Most other disabilities are considered (40) ______, i.e., caused by outside forces.Before the 20th century, only a small (41) ______ of people with disabilities survived for long. Medical treatment for such conditions as stroke or spinal cord (42) ______ was unavailable. People whose disabilities should not have inherently affected their life span were often so mistreated that they (43) ______. Advancements in medicine and social services have created a climate in which (44) . Unfortunately, these basics are often all that is available. Civil liberties such as the right to vote, marry, getan education, and gain employment have historically been denied on the basis of disability.(45)________________________________________________________________ _______. Disabled people formed grassroots coalitions to advocate their rights to integration and meaningful equality of opportunity. (46) . In the mid-1970s, critical legislation mandated (规定)access to education, public transportation, and public facilities, and prohibited employment discrimination by federal agencies or employers receiving federal funds. Part Ⅳ Reading Comprehension (Reading in Depth)(25 minutes)Section ADirections: In this section, there is a short passage with 5 questions or incomplete statements. Read the passage carefully. Then answer the questions or complete the statements in the fewest possible words. Please write your answers on Answer Sheet 2.Questions 47 to 54 are based on the following passage.A key process in interpersonal interaction is that of social comparison, in that we evaluate ourselves in terms of how we compare to others. In particular, we engage in two types of comparison. First, we decide whether we are superior or inferior to others on certain dimensions, such as attractiveness, intelligence, popularity, etc. Here, the important aspect is to compare with an appropriate reference group. For example, modest joggers should not compare their performance with Olympic standard marathon (马拉松) runners. Second, we judge the extent to which we are the same as or different from others. At certain stages of life, especially adolescence, the pressure to be seen as similar to peers is immense. Thus, wearing the rightbrand of clothes or shoes may be of the utmost importance. We also need to know whether our thoughts, beliefs and ideas are in line with those of other people. This is part of the process of self-validation whereby we employ self-disclosures to seek support for ourself-concept.People who do not have access to a good listener may not only be denied the opportunity to heighten their self-awareness, but they are also denied valuable feedback as to the validity and acceptability of their inner thoughts and feelings. By discussing these with others, we receive feedback as to whether these are experiences which others have as well, or whether they are less common. Furthermore, by gauging the reactions to our self-disclosures we learn what types are acceptable or unacceptable with particular people and in specific situations. On occasions it is the fear that certain disclosures may be unacceptable to family or friends that motivates an individual to seek professional help. Counsellors will be familiar with client statements such as: “I just couldn’t talk about this to my husband.”, “I really can’t let my mother know my true feelings.” Another aspect of social comparison in the counselling context relates to a technique known as normalising. This is the process whereby helpers provide reassurance to clients that what they are experiencing is not abnormal快来下载吧or atypical (非典型的), but is a normal reaction shared by others when facing such circumstances. Patient disclosure, facilitated by the therapist, seems also to facilitate the process of normalising.47. To evaluate ourselves, the author thinks it important forus to compare ourselves with_______.48. During adolescence, people generally feel an immense pressure to appear _______.49. It is often difficult for people to heighten their self-awareness without _______.50. What can people do if they find what they think or say unacceptable to family or friends?51. Counsellors often assure their clients that what they experience themselves is only_______.Section BDirections:There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A),B), C) and D). You should decide on the best choice and mark thecorresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.Passage OneQuestions 52 to 56 are based on the following passage.Amid all the job losses, there’s one category of worker that the economic disruption has been good for: nonhumans.From self-service checkout lines at the supermarket to industrial robots armed with saws and taught to carve up animal bodies in slaughter-houses, these ever-more-intelligent machines are now not just assisting workers but actually kicking them out of their jobs.Automation isn’t just affecting factory workers, either. Some law firms now use artificial intelligence software to scanand read mountains of legal documents, work that previously was performed by highly-paid human lawyers.“Robots continue to have an impact on blue-collar jobs, and white-collar jobs are under attack by microprocessors,” says economics professor Ed ward Leamer. The recession permanently wiped out 2.5 million jobs. U.S. gross domestic product has climbed back to pre-recession levels, meaning we’re producing as much as before, only with 6% fewer workers. To be sure, robotics are not the only job killers out there, with outsourcing (外包) stealing far more jobs than automation.Jeff Burnstein, president of the Robotics Industry Association, argues that robots actually save U.S. jobs. His logic: companies that embrace automation might use fewer workers, but tha t’s still better than firing everyone and moving the work overseas.It’s not that robots are cheaper than humans, though often they are. It’s that they’re better. “In some cases the quality requirements are so exacting that even if you wanted to ha ve a hu man do the job, you couldn’t,” Burnstein says.Same goes for surgeons, who’re using robotic systems to perform an ever-growing list of operations—not because the machines save money but because, thanks to the greater precision of robots, the patients recover in less time and have fewer complications, says Dr. Myriam Curet.Surgeons may survive the robot invasion, but others at the hospital might not be so lucky, as iRobot, maker of the Roomba, a robot vacuum cleaner, has been showing off Ava, which could be used as a messenger in a hospital. And once you’re home, recovering, Ava could let you talk to your doctor, so there’s no need to send someone to your house. That “mobile telepresence” could be useful at the office. If you’re away on atrip, yo u can still attend a meeting. Just connect via videoconferencing software, so your face appears on Ava’s screen. Is any job safe? I was hoping to say “journalist,” but researchers are already developing software that can gather facts and write a news story. Which means that a few years from now, a robot could be writing this column. And who will read it? Well, there might be a lot of us hanging around with lots of free time on our hands.快来下载吧注意:此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
2012年美国总统大选 奥巴马罗姆尼第二场辩论完整文本
2012年美国总统大选:奥巴马罗姆尼第二场辩论完整文本2012年美国总统大选第二场辩论(字幕完整版)Transcript: Second presidential debatePresident Barack Obama and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney met in Hempstead, New York Tuesday evening for the second of three presidential debates, moderated by CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley.CROWLEY: Good evening from Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. I'm Candy Crowley from CNN's "State of the Union." We are here for the second presidential debate, a town hall, sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.CROWLEY: The Gallup organization chose 82 uncommitted voters from the New York area. Their questions will drive the night. My goal is to give the conversation direction and to ensure questions get answered.The questions are known to me and my team only. Neither the commission, nor the candidates have seen them. I hope to get to as many questions as possible.CROWLEY: And because I am the optimistic sort, I'm sure the candidates will oblige by keeping their answers concise and on point.Each candidate has as much as two minutes to respond to a common question, and there will be a two-minute follow-up. The audience here in the hall has agreed to be polite and attentive - no cheering or booing or outbursts of any sort.We will set aside that agreement just this once to welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney.(APPLAUSE)Gentlemen, thank you both for joining us here tonight. We have a lot of folks who've been waiting all day to talk to you, so I want to get right to it.Governor Romney, as you know, you won the coin toss, so the first question will go to you. And I want to turn to a first-time voter, Jeremy Epstein, who has a question for you.QUESTION: Mr. President, Governor Romney, as a 20-year-old college student, all I hear from professors, neighbors and others is that when I graduate, I will have little chance to get employment. What can you say to reassure me, but more importantly my parents, that I will be able to sufficiently support myself after I graduate?ROMNEY: Thank you, Jeremy. I appreciate your - your question, and thank you for being here this evening and to all of those from Nassau County that have come, thank you for your time. Thank you to Hofstra University and to Candy Crowley for organizing and leading this - this event.Thank you, Mr. President, also for being part of this - this debate.College kids all over this country. I was in Pennsylvania with someone who had just graduated - this was in Philadelphia - and she said, "I've got my degree. I can't find a job. I've got three part-time jobs. They're just barely enough to pay for my food and pay for an apartment. I can't begin to pay back my student loans."So what we have to do is two things. We have to make sure that we make it easier for kids to afford college.ROMNEY: And also make sure that when they get out of college, there's a job. When I was governor of Massachusetts, to get a high school degree, you had to pass an exam. If you graduated in the top quarter of your airlines, we gave you a John and Abigail Adams scholarship, four years tuition free in the college of your choice in Massachusetts, it's a public institution.I want to make sure we keep our Pell grant program growing. We're also going to have our loan program, so that people are able to afford school. But the key thing is to make sure you can get a job when you get out of school. And what's happened over the last four years has been very, very hard for America's young people. I want you to be able to get a job.I know what it takes to get this economy going. With half of college kids graduating this year without a college - excuse me, without a job. And without a college level job, that's just unacceptable.And likewise you've got more and more debt on your back. So more debt and less jobs. I'm going to change that. I know what it takes to create good jobs again. I know what it takes to make sure that you have the kind of opportunity you deserve. And kids across this country are going to recognize, we're bringing back an economy. It's not going to be like the last four years. The middle-class has been crushed over the last four years, and jobs have been too scarce. I know what it takes to bring them back, and I'm going to do that, and make sure that when you graduate - when do you graduate?QUESTION: 2014.ROMNEY: 2014. When you come out in 2014, I presume I'm going to be president. I'm going to make sure you get a job. Thanks Jeremy. Yeah, you bet.CROWLEY: Mr. President?OBAMA: Jeremy, first of all, your future is bright. And the fact that you're making an investment in higher education is critical. Not just to you, but to the entire nation. Now, the most important thing we can do is to make sure that we are creating jobs in this country. But not just jobs, good paying jobs. Ones that can support a family.OBAMA: And what I want to do, is build on the five million jobs that we've created over the last 30 months in the private sector alone. And there are a bunch of things we can do to make sure yourfuture is bright.Number one, I want to build manufacturing jobs in this country again. Now when Governor Romney said we should let Detroit go bankrupt. I said we're going to bet on American workers and theAmerican auto industry and it's come surging back.I want to do that in industries, not just in Detroit, but all across the country and that means we change our tax code so we're giving incentives to companies that are investing here in the United States and creating jobs here.It also means we're helping them and small businesses to export all around the world to new markets.Number two, we've got to make sure that we have the best education system in the world. And the fact that you're going to college is great, but I want everybody to get a great education andwe've worked hard to make sure that student loans are available for folks like you, but I also want to make sure that community colleges are offering slots for workers to get retrained for the jobs that are out there right now and the jobs of the future.Number three, we've got to control our own energy. Now, not only oil and natural gas, which we've been investing in; but also, we've got to make sure we're building the energy source of the future, not just thinking about next year, but ten years from now, 20 years from now. That's why we've invested in solar and wind and biofuels, energy efficient cars.We've got to reduce our deficit, but we've got to do it in a balanced way. Asking the wealthy to pay a little bit more along with cuts so that we can invest in education like yours. And let's take the money that we've been spending on war over the last decade to rebuild America, roads, bridges schools. We do those things, not only is your future going to be bright but America's future is going to bright as well. CROWLEY: Let me ask you for more immediate answer and begin with Mr. Romney just quickly what - what can you do? We're looking at a situation where 40 percent of the unemployed have been unemployed have been unemployed for six months or more. They don't have the two years that Jeremy has.What about those long term unemployed who need a job right now?ROMNEY: Well what you're seeing in this country is 23 million people struggling to find a job. And a lot of them, as you say, Candy, have been out of work for a long, long, long time. The president's policies have been exercised over the last four years and they haven't put Americans back to work.We have fewer people working today than we had when the president took office. If the - the unemployment rate was 7.8 percent when he took office, it's 7.8 percent now. But if you calculated thatunemployment rate, taking back the people who dropped out of the workforce, it would be 10.7 percent.We have not made the progress we need to make to put people back to work. That's why I put out a five-point plan that gets America 12 million new jobs in four years and rising take-home pay. It's going to help Jeremy get a job when he comes out of school. It's going to help people across the country that are unemployed right now.And one thing that the president said, which I want to make sure that we understand, he said that I said we should take Detroit bankrupt. And that's right. My plan was to have the company gothrough bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy's and Condell (ph) Airlines and come out stronger.And I know he keeps saying, you want to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did.And I think it's important to know that that was a process that was necessary to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommended and ultimately what happened.CROWLEY: Let me give the president a chance.Go ahead.OBAMA: Candy, what Governor Romney said just isn't true. He wanted to take them into bankruptcy without providing them any way to stay open. And we would have lost a million jobs. And that - don't take my word for it, take the executives at GM and Chrysler, some of whom are Republicans, may even support Governor Romney. But they'll tell you his prescription wasn't going to work.And Governor Romney's says he's got a five-point plan? Governor Romney doesn't have a five-point plan. He has a one-point plan. And that plan is to make sure that folks at the top play by a different set of rules. That's been his philosophy in the private sector, that's been his philosophy as governor, that's been his philosophy as a presidential candidate.You can make a lot of money and pay lower tax rates than somebody who makes a lot less. You can ship jobs overseas and get tax breaks for it. You can invest in a company, bankrupt it, lay off the workers, strip away their pensions, and you still make money. That's exactly the philosophy that we've seen in place for the last decade. That's what's been squeezing middle class families.And we have fought back for four years to get out of that mess. The last thing we need to do is to go back to the very same policies that got us there.CROWLEY: Mr. President, the next question is going to be for you here.And, Mr. Romney - Governor Romney - there'll be plenty of chances here to go on, but I want to...ROMNEY: That - that Detroit - that Detroit answer...CROWLEY: We have all these folks.ROMNEY: ... that Detroit answer...CROWLEY: I will let you absolutely...ROMNEY: ... and the rest of the answer, way off the mark.CROWLEY: OK. Will - will - you certainly will have lots of time here coming up.Because I want to move you on to something that's sort of connected to cars here, and - and go over. And we want to get a question from Phillip Tricolla.QUESTION: Your energy secretary, Steven Chu, has now been on record three times stating it's not policy of his department to help lower gas prices. Do you agree with Secretary Chu that this is not the job of the Energy Department?OBAMA: The most important thing we can do is to make sure we control our own energy. So here's what I've done since I've been president. We have increased oil production to the highest levels in16 years.Natural gas production is the highest it's been in decades. We have seen increases in coal production and coal employment. But what I've also said is we can't just produce traditional source of energy. We've also got to look to the future. That's why we doubled fuel efficiency standards on cars. That means that in the middle of the next decade, any car you buy, you're going to end up going twice as far on a gallon of gas. That's why we doubled clean - clean energy production like wind and solar and biofuels.And all these things have contributed to us lowering our oil imports to the lowest levels in 16 years. Now, I want to build on that. And that means, yes, we still continue to open up new areas fordrilling. We continue to make it a priority for us to go after natural gas. We've got potentially 600,000 jobs and 100 years worth of energy right beneath our feet with natural gas.And we can do it in an environmentally sound way. But we've also got to continue to figure out how we have efficiency energy, because ultimately that's how we're going to reduce demand and that's what's going to keep gas prices lower.Now, Governor Romney will say he's got an all-of-the-above plan, but basically his plan is to let the oil companies write the energy policies. So he's got the oil and gas part, but he doesn't have theclean energy part. And if we are only thinking about tomorrow or the next day and not thinking about 10 years from now, we're not going to control our own economic future. Because China, Germany, they're making these investments. And I'm not going to cede those jobs of the future to those countries. I expect those new energy sources to be built right here in the United States.That's going to help Jeremy get a job. It's also going to make sure that you're not paying as much for gas.CROWLEY: Governor, on the subject of gas prices?ROMNEY: Well, let's look at the president's policies, all right, as opposed to the rhetoric, because we've had four years of policies being played out. And the president's right in terms of the additional oil production, but none of it came on federal land. As a matter of fact, oil production is down 14 percent this year on federal land, and gas production was down 9 percent. Why? Because the president cut in half the number of licenses and permits for drilling on federal lands, and in federal waters.So where'd the increase come from? Well a lot of it came from the Bakken Range in North Dakota. What was his participation there? The administration brought a criminal action against the peopledrilling up there for oil, this massive new resource we have. And what was the cost?20 or 25 birds were killed and brought out a migratory bird act to go after them on a criminal basis.Look, I want to make sure we use our oil, our coal, our gas, our nuclear, our renewables. I believe very much in our renewable capabilities; ethanol, wind, solar will be an important part of our energy mix.But what we don't need is to have the president keeping us from taking advantage of oil, coal and gas. This has not been Mr. Oil, or Mr. Gas, or Mr. Coal. Talk to the people that are working in thoseindustries. I was in coal country. People grabbed my arms and said, "Please save my job." The head of the EPA said, "You can't build a coal plant. You'll virtually - it's virtually impossible given our regulations." When the president ran for office, he said if you build a coal plant, you can go ahead, but you'll go bankrupt. That's not the right course for America.Let's take advantage of the energy resources we have, as well as the energy sources for the future. And if we do that, if we do what I'm planning on doing, which is getting us energy independent, North America energy independence within eight years, you're going to see manufacturing jobs come back. Because our energy is low cost, that are already beginning to come back because of our abundant energy. I'll get America and North America energy independent. I'll do it by more drilling, more permits and licenses. We're going to bring that pipeline in from Canada. How in the world the president said no to that pipeline? I will never know.This is about bringing good jobs back for the middle class of America, and that's what I'm going to do.CROWLEY: Mr. President, let me just see if I can move you to the gist of this question, which is, are we looking at the new normal? I can tell you that tomorrow morning, a lot of people in Hempstead will wake up and fill up and they will find that the price of gas is over $4 a gallon.Is it within the purview of the government to bring those prices down, or are we looking at the new normal?OBAMA: Candy, there's no doubt that world demand's gone up, but our production is going up, and we're using oil more efficiently. And very little of what Governor Romney just said is true. We've opened up public lands. We're actually drilling more on public lands than in the previous administration and my - the previous president was an oil man.And natural gas isn't just appearing magically. We're encouraging it and working with the industry.And when I hear Governor Romney say he's a big coal guy, I mean, keep in mind, when - Governor, when you were governor of Massachusetts, you stood in front of a coal plant and pointed at itand said, "This plant kills," and took great pride in shutting it down. And now suddenly you're a big champion of coal.So what I've tried to do is be consistent. With respect to something like coal, we made the largest investment in clean coal technology, to make sure that even as we're producing more coal, we'reproducing it cleaner and smarter. Same thing with oil, same thing with natural gas.And the proof is our oil imports are down to the lowest levels in 20 years. Oil production is up, natural gas production is up, and, most importantly, we're also starting to build cars that are moreefficient.And that's creating jobs. That means those cars can be exported, 'cause that's the demand around the world, and it also means that it'll save money in your pocketbook.OBAMA: That's the strategy you need, an all-of-the-above strategy, and that's what we're going to do in the next four years.ROMNEY: But that's not what you've done in the last four years. That's the problem. In the last four years, you cut permits and licenses on federal land and federal waters in half.OBAMA: Not true, Governor Romney.ROMNEY: So how much did you cut (inaudible)?OBAMA: Not true.ROMNEY: How much did you cut them by, then?OBAMA: Governor, we have actually produced more oil –ROMNEY: No, no. How much did you cut licenses and permits onfederal land and federal waters?OBAMA: Governor Romney, here's what we did. There were a wholebunch of oil companies.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: No, no, I had a question and the question was how much did you cut them by?OBAMA: You want me to answer a question –ROMNEY: How much did you cut them by?OBAMA: I'm happy to answer the question.ROMNEY: All right. And it is –OBAMA: Here's what happened. You had a whole bunch of oil companies who had leases on public lands that they weren't using. So what we said was you can't just sit on this for 10, 20, 30 years,decide when you want to drill, when you want to produce, when it's most profitable for you. These are public lands. So if you want to drill on public lands, you use it or you lose it.ROMNEY: OK, (inaudible) –OBAMA: And so what we did was take away those leases. And we are now reletting them so that we can actually make a profit.ROMNEY: And production on private - on government land –OBAMA: Production is up.ROMNEY: - is down.OBAMA: No, it isn't.ROMNEY: Production on government land of oil is down 14 percent.OBAMA: Governor –ROMNEY: And production on gas –(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: It's just not true.ROMNEY: It's absolutely true. Look, there's no question but the people recognize that we have not produced more (inaudible) on federal lands and in federal waters. And coal, coal production is not up; coal jobs are not up.I was just at a coal facility, where some 1,200 people lost their jobs. The right course for America is to have a true all-of-the-above policy. I don't think anyone really believes that you're a personwho's going to be pushing for oil and gas and coal. You'll get your chance in a moment. I'm still speaking.OBAMA: Well –ROMNEY: And the answer is I don't believe people think that's the case –OBAMA: - (inaudible).ROMNEY: That wasn't the question.OBAMA: OK.ROMNEY: That was a statement. I don't think the American people believe that. I will fight for oil, coal and natural gas. And the proof, the proof of whether a strategy is working or not is what theprice is that you're paying at the pump. If you're paying less than you paid a year or two ago, why, then, the strategy is working. But you're paying more. When the president took office, the price of gasoline here in Nassau County was about $1.86 a gallon. Now, it's $4.00 a gallon. The price of electricity is up.If the president's energy policies are working, you're going to see the cost of energy come down. I will fight to create more energy in this country, to get America energy secure. And part of that isbringing in a pipeline of oil from Canada, taking advantage of the oil and coal we have here, drilling offshore in Alaska, drilling offshore in Virginia where the people want it. Those things will get us theenergy we need.CROWLEY: Mr. President, could you address, because we did finally get to gas prices here, could you address what the governor said, which is if your energy policy was working, the price of gasoline would not be $4 a gallon here. Is that true?OBAMA: Well, think about what the governor - think about what the governor just said. He said when I took office, the price of gasoline was $1.80, $1.86. Why is that? Because the economy was on the verge of collapse, because we were about to go through the worst recession since the Great Depression, as a consequence of some of the same policies that Governor Romney's now promoting.So, it's conceivable that Governor Romney could bring down gas prices because with his policies, we might be back in that same mess. What I want to do is to create an economy that is strong, and atthe same time produce energy. And with respect to this pipeline that Governor Romney keeps on talking about, we've - we've built enough pipeline to wrap around the entire earth once.So, I'm all for pipelines. I'm all for oil production. What I'm not for is us ignoring the other half of the equation. So, for example, on wind energy, when Governor Romney says "these are imaginary jobs." When you've got thousands of people right now in Iowa, right now in Colorado, who are working, creating wind power with good-paying manufacturing jobs, and the Republican senator in that – in Iowa is all for it, providing tax breaks (ph) to help this work and Governor Romney says I'm opposed. I'd get rid of it.That's not an energy strategy for the future. And we need to win that future. And I intend to win it as President of the United States.CROWLEY: I got to - I got to move you on –ROMNEY: He gets the first –CROWLEY: - and the next question –ROMNEY: He actually got –CROWLEY: - for you –ROMNEY: He actually got the first question. So I get the lastquestion - last answer –CROWLEY: (Inaudible) in the follow up, it doesn't quite work like that. But I'm going to give you a chance here. I promise you, I'm going to.And the next question is for you. So if you want to, you know, continue on - but I don't want to leave all –ROMNEY: Candy, Candy –CROWLEY: - sitting here –ROMNEY: Candy, I don't have a policy of stopping wind jobs in Iowa and that - they're not phantom jobs. They're real jobs.CROWLEY: OK.ROMNEY: I appreciate wind jobs in Iowa and across our country. I appreciate the jobs in coal and oil and gas. I'm going to make sure –CROWLEY: OK.ROMNEY: - we're taking advantage of our energy resources. We'll bring back manufacturing to America. We're going to get through a very aggressive energy policy, 31/2 million more jobs in thiscountry. It's critical to our future.OBAMA: Candy, it's not going to –CROWLEY: We're going to move you along –OBAMA: Used to being interrupted.CROWLEY: We're going to move you both along to taxes over here and all these folks that have been waiting.Governor, this question is for you. It comes from Mary Follano – Follano, sorry.ROMNEY: Hi, Mary.QUESTION: Governor Romney, you have stated that if you're elected president, you would plan to reduce the tax rates for all the tax brackets and that you would work with the Congress to eliminate some deductions in order to make up for the loss in revenue.Concerning the - these various deductions, the mortgage deductions, the charitable deductions, the child tax credit and also the - oh, what's that other credit? I forgot.OBAMA: You're doing great.QUESTION: Oh, I remember.The education credits, which are important to me, because I have children in college. What would be your position on those things, which are important to the middle class?ROMNEY: Thank you very much. And let me tell you, you're absolutely right about part of that, which is I want to bring the rates down, I want to simplify the tax code, and I want to get middle-income taxpayers to have lower taxes.And the reason I want middle-income taxpayers to have lower taxes is because middle-income taxpayers have been buried over the past four years. You've seen, as middle-income people in this country, incomes go down $4,300 a family, even as gasoline prices have gone up $2,000. Health insurance premiums, up $2,500. Food prices up. Utility prices up.The middle-income families in America have been crushed over the last four years. So I want to get some relief to middle-income families. That's part - that's part one.Now, how about deductions? 'Cause I'm going to bring rates down across the board for everybody, but I'm going to limit deductions and exemptions and credits, particularly for people at the high end, because I am not going to have people at the high end pay less than they're paying now.The top 5 percent of taxpayers will continue to pay 60 percent of the income tax the nation collects. So that'll stay the same.Middle-income people are going to get a tax break.And so, in terms of bringing down deductions, one way of doing that would be say everybody gets - I'll pick a number - $25,000 of deductions and credits, and you can decide which ones to use. Your home mortgage interest deduction, charity, child tax credit, and so forth, you can use those as part of filling that bucket, if you will, of deductions.But your rate comes down and the burden also comes down on you for one more reason, and that is every middle-income taxpayer no longer will pay any tax on interest, dividends or capital gains. No tax on your savings. That makes life a lot easier.If you're getting interest from a bank, if you're getting a statement from a mutual fund or any other kind of investment you have, you don't have to worry about filing taxes on that, because there'llbe no taxes for anybody making $200,000.00 per year and less, on your interest, dividends and capital gains. Why am I lowering taxes on the middle-class? Because under the last four years, they've been buried. And I want to help people in the middle-class.And I will not - I will not under any circumstances, reduce the share that's being paid by the highest income taxpayers. And I will not, under any circumstances increase taxes on the middle-class. The president's spending, the president's borrowing will cost this nation to have to raise taxes on the American people. Not just at the high end.A recent study has shown the people in the middle-class will see $4,000.00 per year in higher taxes as a result of the spending and borrowing of this administration.I will not let that happen. I want to get us on track to a balanced budget, and I'm going to reduce the tax burden on middle income families. And what's that going to do? It's going to help those families, and it's going to create incentives to start growing jobs again in this country.CROWLEY: Thanks, Governor.OBAMA: My philosophy on taxes has been simple. And that is, I want to give middle-class families and folks who are striving to get into the middle-class some relief. Because they have been hit hardover the last decade. Over the last 15, over the last 20 years.So four years ago I stood on a stage just like this one. Actually it was a town hall, and I said I would cut taxes for middle- class families, and that's what I've done, by。
肠道微生物在结直肠癌中的作用
示,女性结肠癌仅次于乳腺癌,男性仅次于肺癌和前 列腺癌⑻。
最近的数据显示,一些细菌产生促进肿瘤的代 谢产物,如次级胆汁酸,促进胃肠道肿瘤的发生和发 展,而另一些细菌产生短链脂肪酸(SCFA),如丁酸 盐,可以抑制胃肠道的炎症和癌变⑼。下面我们就 来具体的了解一下肠道微生物群在结直肠癌发生发 展中的作用机制。 2.1细菌毒素 现有研究已证明,可以通过特定毒 素诱导DNA损伤,从而增强致癌作用。Colibactin (一种人体肠道细菌产生的基因毒素)由大肠杆菌表 达,已被证明其可诱导DNA损伤,影响基因组稳定 性,并促进小鼠结肠癌的发生[⑹。粪肠球菌已被证
[11] Wu S, Rhee KJ, Zhang M, et al. Bacteroides fragilis toxin stimu lates intestinal epithelial cell shedding and gamma - secretase - de pendent E - cadherin cleavage[ J]. J Cell Sci, 2007, 120:1 944 1 952.
内蒙古医学杂志Inner Mongolia Med J 2021年第53卷第6期
定作用。此外,服用益生菌改善肠道微生物群的种 类,可以调节几种化疗药物的活性和毒性,提高化疗 疗效、降低化疗对机体的毒性。具体如下:(1)有机 体中的益生菌通过其抗菌特性影响其他微生物,它 可以粘附在肠黏膜上皮细胞,与其他致病菌争夺生 存空间,或与病原体结合,跟病原体争夺营养。益生 菌可以产生细菌素、非结合胆汁酸、尿喀噪、过氧化 氢和乳酸等抗菌物质,这些物质是益生菌抑制致癌 和致病微生物的元素之一⑵]。(2)益生菌可以增加 膳食纤维的发酵,增加具有治疗潜力的抗癌化合物 的水平,并具有抗大肠癌的活性,如短脂肪酸(SCFAs)、共辄亚油酸(Clas)和酚类】22]。(3)Hsieh等的 研究表明,双歧杆菌属的一些细菌种类具有促进上 皮完整性和防止由肿瘤坏死因子- a(TNF-a)诱导 的上皮屏障破坏的能力。在坏死性小肠结肠炎 (NEC)的体外模型中,研究人员表明益生菌乳杆菌 菌株增强了紧密连接的完整性和肠道屏障。紧密连 接蛋白claudin - 3和occludin在肠道通透性中起重 要作用,一项研究表明,鼠李糖乳杆菌GG和瑞氏乳 杆菌ZJ617的初始治疗有助于减少氧化应激和炎 症,进而导致紧密连接蛋白的表达改善,从而恢复屏 障功能丽。
结直肠癌的现状CRC)是最常见的消化道恶性肿瘤之一
结直肠癌的现状结直肠癌(CRC)是最常见的消化道恶性肿瘤之一。
过去几十年里,由于饮食结构和生活习惯的变化,我国城乡居民的结直肠癌发病率呈持续性升高。
CRC目前已成为我国发病率前5的恶性肿瘤[1]。
CRC的症状常表现为腹痛、便血、黑便,大便习惯改变及贫血等。
由于临床症状的出现常处于晚期,且不能与炎症性肠病、痔疮等良性病变特异区分,因此无症状期的早期筛查是提高CRC存活率、改善预后的根本措施。
结直肠癌常用的筛查手段根据《中国早期结直肠癌筛查及内镜诊治指南》的推荐,CRC的早期筛查手段主要包括:粪便潜血试验(FOBT)FOBT是目前国际通用的、也是我国临床上最被广泛使用的CRC无创筛查手段。
Zhang等[2]的大数据分析显示,免疫化学法大便隐血试验(iFOBT)筛查减少了59%的CRC死亡率,与结肠镜效果接近(61%),显著优于乙状结肠镜(33%)。
结肠镜/乙状结肠镜结肠镜下病理活检是目前诊断CRC的金标准,但由于其有创性且费用高昂,在我国一般不直接作为初筛方案。
乙状结肠镜由于自身的局限性,会遗漏大量结肠病变,对近端CRC发病率无明显降低作用。
其他筛查方法其他方法如基因甲基化、虚拟结肠镜检查及结肠胶囊内镜等,由于费用等问题,目前在我国推广有相当的难度。
综上而言,iFOBT由于具有灵敏度高、费用少、无创性及操作方便等诸多优点,因而是目前我国CRC早期筛查最适合、也是最被广泛应用的检测方法。
发展中的iFOBT检测技术iFOBT用的是什么检测原理和筛查指标?其在使用中可能存在哪些问题?在未来具有怎样的改进和发展方向?下面我们通过回顾iFOBT的发展历程来进一步了解该检测方法:指标迭代:从单项到联检经典指标:血红蛋白(Hb)Hb是最先也是最常被使用的便隐血和检测指标,在高等动物体内具有运载氧的功能。
每分子Hb由4个亚基组成,分别为2个α亚基和2个β亚基。
消化道病变时会有少量出血并释放血红蛋白,通过免疫反应对粪便Hb指标进行检测即可提示消化道的病变情况。
2012年6月六级真题及答案完整版
2012年6⽉六级真题及答案完整版Part ⅠWriting (30 minutes)Directions:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic The Impact of the Internet on Interpersonal Communication. You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.The Impact of the Internet on Interpersonal CommunicationPart ⅡReading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning)(15minutes)Directions: In this part. You will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A)、B)、C)and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.The Three-Year SolutionHartwick College, a small liberal-arts school in upstate New York, makes New York, makes this offer to well prepared students: earn your undergraduate degree in three years instead of four, and save about 543,000—the amount of one year’s tuition and fees. A number of innovative colleges are making the same offer to students anxious about saving time and money. That’s both an opportunity and a warning for the best higher-education system in the world.The United States has almost all of the world’s best universities. A recent Chinese survey ranks 35 American universities among the top 50, eight among the top 10. Our research universities have been the key to developing the competitive advantages that help Americans produce 25% of all the world’s wealth. In 2007, 623,805 of the world’s brightest students were attracted to American universities.Yet, there are signs of peril (危险)within American higher education. U.S. colleges have to compete in the marketplace. Students may choose among 6,000 public, private, nonprofit, for profit, or religious institutions of higher learning. In addition, almost all of the 532 billion the federal government provides for university research is awarded competitively.But many colleges and universities are stuck in the past. For instance, the idea of the fall-to-spring“school year”hasn’t changed much since before the American Revolution, when we were a summer stretch no longer makes sense. Former George Washington University president Stephen Trachtenberg estimates that a typical college uses its facilities for academic purposes a little more than half the calendar year.“While college facilities sit idle, they continue to generate maintenance expenses that contribute to the high cost of running a college,” he has written.Within academic departments, tenure(终⾝职位),combined with age-discrimination laws, makes faculty turnover—critical for a university to remain current in changing times—difficult. Instead of protecting speech and encouraging diversity and innovative thinking, the tenure system often stifles(压制)them: younger professors must win the approval of established colleagues for tenure, encouraging like-mindedness and sometimes inhibiting the free flow of ideas.as their presidents. The average amount of time students now take to complete an undergraduate degree has stretched to six years and seven months as students interrupted by work, inconvenienced by unavailable classes, or lured by one more football season find it hard to graduate.Congress has tried to help students with college costs through Pell Grants and other forms of tuition support. But some of their fixes have made the problem worse. The stack of congressional regulations governing federal student grants and loans now stands twice as tall as I do. Filling out these forms consumes 7% of every tuition dollar.For all of these reasons, some colleges like Hartwick are rethinking the old way of doing things and questioning decades-old assumptions about what a college degree means. For instance, why does it have to take four years to earn a diploma? This fall, 16 first-year students and four second-year students at Hartwick enrolled in the school’s new three year degree program. According to the college, the plan is designed for high-ability, highly motivated student who wish to save money or to move along more rapidly toward advanced degrees.By eliminating that extra year, there year degree students save 25% in costs. Instead of taking 30 credits a year, these students take 40. During January, Hartwick runs a four week course during which students may earn three to four credits on or off campus, including a number of international sites. Summer courses are not required, but a student may enroll in them—and pay extra. Three year students get first crack at course registration. There are no changes in the number of courses professors teach or in their pay.The three-year degree isn’t a new idea. Geniuses have always breezed through. Judson College, a 350-student institution inAlabama, has offered students a three-year option for 40 years. Students attend “short terms”in May and June to earn the credits required for graduation. Bates College in Maine and Ball State University in Indiana are among other colleges offering three-year options.Changes at the high-school level are also helping to make it easier for many students to earn their undergraduate degrees in less time. One of five students arrives at college today with Advanced Placement (AP) credits amounting to a semester or more of college level work. Many universities, including large schools like the University of Texas, make it easy for these AP students to graduate faster.For students who don’t plan to stop with an undergraduate degree, the three-year plan may have an even greater appeal. Dr. John Sergent, head of Vanderbilt University Medical School’s residency (住院医⽣) program, enrolled in Vanderbilt’s undergraduate college in 1959. He entered medical school after only three years as did four or five of his classmates.” My first year of medical school counted as my se nior year, which meant I had to take three to four labs a week to get all my sciences in. I basically skipped my senior year,” says Sergent. He still had time to be a student senator and meet his wife. There are, however, drawbacks to moving through school at such a brisk pace. For one, it deprives students of the luxury of time to roam (遨游) intellectually. Compressing everything into three years also leaves less time for growing up, engaging in extracurricular activities, and studying abroad. On crowded campuses it could mean fewer opportunities to get into a prized professor’s class. Iowa’s Waldorf College has graduated several hundred students in its three-year degree program, but it now phasing out the option. Most Waldorf students wanted the full four-year experience—academically, socially, and athletically. And faculty members will be wary of any change that threatens the core curriculum in the name of moving students into the workforce.“Most high governmental officials seem to conceive of education in this light—as a way to ensure economic competitiveness and continued economic growth,”Derek Bok, former president of Harvard, told The Washington Post. “I strongly disagree with this app roach.” Another risk: the new campus schedules might eventually produce less revenue for the institution and longer working hours for faculty members.Adopting a three-year option will not come easily to most school. Those that wish to tackle tradition and make American campus more cost-conscious may find it easier to take Trachtenberg’s advice: open campuses year-round.“You could run two complete coll eges, with two complete faculties,”hesays.“That’s without cutting the length of students’ vacations, increasing class sizes, or requiring faculty to teach more.”Whether they experiment with three-year degrees, offer year-round classes, challenge the tenure system—or all of the above —universities are slowly realizing that to stay competitive and relevant they must adapt to a rapidly changingfinancial help, asking legislators for more state support, or asking students even higher tuition payments. Campuses willing to adopt convenient schedules along with more focused, less-expensive degrees may find that they have a competitive advantage in attracting bright, motivated students. These sorts of innovations can help American universities avoid the perils of success.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
2012年6月英语六级阅读理解备考:真题长难句(5)
21.This is especially true in agriculture, where sustainable development is often taken as the sole measure of progress without a proper appreciation of historical and cultural perspectives. (2008年12⽉)【分析】本句为复合句。
主句为This is especially true in agriculture。
where引导的⾮限定性定语从句sustainable…perspectives修饰逗号前⾯的agriculture。
historical and cultural perspectives意为“从历史和⽂化的⾓度”。
【译⽂】这⼀现象在农业领域更是如此。
在农业领域,可持续发展经常被当作进步的标准,但⼈们忽略了从历史和⽂化的⾓度去合理地评价。
22.Although children of Mexican immigrants do better, in terms of educational and professional attainment, than their parents, UCLA sociologist Edward Telles has found that the gains don’t continue.【分析】本句为复杂句。
主句为UCLA sociologist Edward Telles has found that the gains don’t continue。
Although引导让步状语从句。
in terms of意为“在……⽅⾯”,in terms… attainment在句中作插⼊语。
that引导的宾语从句作find的宾语。
【译⽂】尽管墨西哥移民的孩⼦在教育和职业造诣⽅⾯⽐他们的⽗母做得要好,但加利福尼亚⼤学洛杉矶分校的社会学家爱德华•泰勒斯却发现,他们的收⼊没有增加。
2012美国大选副总统辩论文字稿
Vice Presidential debate2012Transcript of the Oct.11debate between Vice President Biden and his Republican challenger, Rep.Paul Ryan of Wisconsin,moderated by Martha Raddatz of ABC News.Source:Federal News ServiceMARTHA RADDATZ:Good evening,and welcome to the first and only vice presidential debate of2012,sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.I'm Martha Raddatz of ABC News,and I am honored to moderate this debate between two men who have dedicated much of their lives to public service.Tonight's debate is divided between domestic and foreign policy issues.And I'm going to move back and forth between foreign and domestic since that is what a vice president or president would have to do.We will have nine different segments.At the beginning of each segment,I will ask both candidates a question,and they will each have two minutes to answer.Then I will encourage a discussion between the candidates with follow-up questions.By coin toss,it has been determined that Vice President Biden will be first to answer the opening question.We have a wonderful audience here at Centre College tonight.You will no doubt hear their enthusiasm at the end of the debate and right now as we welcome Vice President Biden and Congressman Paul Ryan.(Applause.)Very nice to see you.Very nice to see you.VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN:How you doing?MS.RADDATZ:Hey,you got your little wave to the families in.That's great.Good evening,gentlemen.It really is an honor to be here with both of you.I would like to begin with Libya on a rather somber note.One month ago tonight,on the anniversary of9/11,Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other brave Americans were killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi.The State Department has now made clear there were no protesters there.It was a pre-planned assault by heavily armed men.Wasn't this a massive intelligence failure,Vice President Biden?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:What it was,it was a tragedy,Martha.It—Chris Stevens was one of our best.We lost three other brave Americans.And I can make absolutely two commitments to you and all of the American people tonight: One,we will find and bring to justice the men who did this.And secondly,we will get to the bottom of it,and whatever—wherever the facts lead us, wherever they lead us,w will make clear to the American public,because whatever mistakes were made will not be made again.When you're looking at a president,Martha,it seems to me that you should take a look at his most important responsibility.That's carrying forward the national security of the country.And the best way to do that is take a look at how he's handled he issues of the day.On Iraq,the president said he would end the ernor Romney said that was a tragic mistake;we should have left—that he ended it—Governor Romney said that was a tragic mistake;we should have left30,000troops there.With regard to Afghanistan,he said he will end the war ernor Romney said we should not set a date,number one,and number two,with regard to2014,it depends.When it came to Osama bin Laden,the president,the first day in office—I was sitting with him in the Oval Office.He called in the CIA and signed an order saying,my highest priority is to get bin Laden.Prior to the election,prior to the—him being sworn in,Governor Romney was asked a question about how he would proceed.He said,I wouldn't move heaven and earth to get bin Laden.He didn't understand it was more than about taking a—a murderer off the battlefield;it was about restoring America's heart and letting terrorists around the world know if you do harm to America,we will track you to the gates of hell,if need be.And lastly,the—the president of the United States has—has led with a steady hand and clear ernor Romney,the opposite.The last thing we need now is another war.MS.RADDATZ:Congressman Ryan.REP.PAUL RYAN:(Sighs.)We mourn the loss of these four Americans who were murdered. When you take a look at what has happened just in the last few weeks,they sent the U.N. ambassador out to say that this was because of a protest and a YouTube video.It took the president two weeks to acknowledge that this was a terrorist attack.He went to the U.N.,and in his speech at the U.N.he said six times—he talked about the YouTube video.Look,if we are hit by terrorists,we're going to call it for what it is,a terrorist attack.Our ambassador in Paris has a Marine detachment guarding him.Shouldn't we have a Marinedetachment guarding our ambassador in Benghazi,a place where we knew that there was an al-Qaida cell with arms?This is becoming more troubling by the day.They first blamed the YouTube video;now they're trying to blame the Romney-Ryan ticket for making this an issue.And with respect to Iraq,we had the same position before the withdrawal,which was we agreed with the Obama administration:Let's have a Status of Forces Agreement to make sure that we secure our gains.The vice president was put in charge of those negotiations by President Obama,and they failed to get the agreement.We don't have a Status of Forces Agreement because they failed to get one.That's what we are talking about.And when it comes to our veterans,we owe them a great debt of gratitude for what they've done for us,including your son Beau.But we also want to make sure that we don't lose the things we fought so hard to get.And with respect to Afghanistan and the2014deadline,we agree with a2014transition.But what we also want to do is make sure that we're not projecting weakness abroad,and that's what's happening here.This Benghazi issue would be a tragedy in and of itself.But unfortunately it's indicative of a broader problem,and that is what we are watching on our TV screens is the unraveling of the Obama foreign policy,which is making the world more—more chaotic and us less safe.MS.RADDATZ:I just want to talk to you about right in the middle of the ernor Romney—and you're talking about this again tonight—talked about the weakness,talked about apologies from the Obama administration.Was that really appropriate right in the middle of the crisis?REP.RYAN:On that same day,the Obama administration had the exact same position.Let's recall that they disavowed their own statement that they had put out earlier in the day in Cairo.So we had the same position,but we will—it's never to early to speak out for our values.We should have spoken out right away when the Green Revolution was up and starting,when the mullahs in Iran were attacking their people.We should not have called Bashar Assad a reformer when he was turning his Russian-provided guns on his own people.We should always stand up for peace,for democracy,for individual rights,and we should not be imposing these devastating defense cuts,because what that does when we equivocate on our values, when we show that we're cutting our own defense—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Am I going to get to say anything here?REP.RYAN:—it makes us more weak.It projects weakness,and when we look weak,our adversaries are much more willing to test us,they're more brazen in their attacks,and our allies are less willing to—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:With all due respect,that's a bunch of malarkey.In fact—MS.RADDATZ:And why is that so?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Because not a single thing he said is accurate.First of all—MS.RADDATZ:Be specific.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:I will be very specific.Number one,the—this lecture on embassy security—the congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by$300million below what we asked for,number one.So much for the embassy security piece.Number two,Governor Romney,before he knew the facts,before he even knew that our ambassador was killed,he was out making a political statement which was panned by the media around the world.And this talk about this—this weakness,I—I don't understand what my friend's talking about here.We—this is a president who's gone out and done everything he has said he was going to do. This is the guy who's repaired our alliances so the rest of the world follows us again.This is the guy who brought the entire world,including Russia and China,to bring about the most devastating,most devastating—the most devastating efforts on Iran to make sure that they in fact stop with their—look,I—I—I just—I mean,these guys bet against America all the time.REP.RYAN:I—MS.RADDATZ:Can we talk about—let me go back to Libya.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Yeah,sure.MS.RADDATZ:What were you first told about the attack?Why were people talking about protests?When people in the consulate first saw armed men attacking with guns,there were no protesters.Why did that go on for weeks?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Because that's exactly what we were told—MS.RADDATZ:By who?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:—by the intelligence community.The intelligence community told us that.As they learned more facts about exactly what happened,they changed their assessment.That's why there's also an investigation headed by Tom Pickering,a leading diplomat in the—from the Reagan years,who is doing an investigation as to whether or not there were any lapses,what the lapses were,so that they will never happen again.But—MS.RADDATZ:And they wanted more security there.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Well,we weren't told they wanted more security again.We did not know they wanted more security again.And by the way,at the time we were told exactly—we said exactly what the intelligence community told us that they knew.That was the assessment. And as the intelligence community changed their view,we made it clear they changed their view.That's why I said,we will get to the bottom of this.You know,usually when there's a crisis,we pull together.We pull together as a nation.But as I said,even before we knew what happened to the ambassador,the governor was holding a press conference—was holding a press conference.That's not presidential leadership.MS.RADDATZ:Mr.Ryan,I want to ask you about—the Romney campaign talks a lot about no apologies.He has a book called No Apologies.Should the U.S.have apologized for Americans burning Qurans in Afghanistan?Should the U.S.apologize for U.S.Marines urinating on Taliban corpses?REP.RYAN:Oh,gosh,yes.Urinating on Taliban corpses?What we should not apologize for —MS.RADDATZ:Burning Qurans(immediately?)?REP.RYAN:What—what we should not be apologizing for are standing up for our values. What we should not be doing is saying to the Egyptian people,while Mubarak is cracking down on them,that he's a good guy and then the next week say he ought to go.What we should not be doing is rejecting claims for—calls for more security in our barracks,in our Marine—we need Marines in Benghazi when the commander on the ground says we need more forces for security.There were requests for extra security.Those requests were not honored.Look,this was the anniversary of9/11.It was Libya,a country we knew we had al-Qaida cells there.As we know,al-Qaida and its affiliates are on the rise in northern Africa.And we did not give our ambassador in Benghazi a Marine detachment?Of course there is an investigation sowe can make sure that this never happens again.But when it comes to speaking up for our values,we should not apologize for those.Here is the problem.Look at all the various issues out there and that's unraveling before our eyes.The vice president talks about sanctions on Iran.They got—we've had four—MS.RADDATZ:Let's move to Iran.I'd actually like to move to Iran because there is really no bigger national security—REP.RYAN:Absolutely.MS.RADDATZ:—this country is facing.Both President Obama and Governor Romney have said they will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon,even if that means military action. Last week former Defense Secretary Bob Gates said a strike on Iran's facilities would not work and,quote,could prove catastrophic,haunting us for generations.Can the two of you be absolutely clear and specific to the American people how effective would a military strike be? Congressman Ryan.REP.RYAN:We cannot allow Iran to gain a nuclear weapons capability.Now,let's take a look at where we've gone—come from.When Barack Obama was elected, they had enough fissile material,nuclear material,to make one bomb.Now they have enough for five.They're racing toward a nuclear weapon.They're four years closer toward a nuclear weapons capability.We've had four different sanctions at the U.N.on Iran,three from the Bush administration,one here.And the only reason we got it is because Russia watered it down and prevented the—the sanctions from hitting the central bank.Mitt Romney proposed these sanctions in2007.In Congress,I've been fighting for these sanctions since2009.The administration was blocking us every step of the way.Only because we had strong bipartisan support for these tough sanctions were we able to overrule their objections and put them in spite of the administration.Imagine what would have happened if we had these sanctions in place earlier.You think Iran's not brazen?Look at what they're doing.They're stepping up their terrorist attacks.They tried a terrorist attack in the United States last year when they tried to blow up the Saudi ambassador at a restaurant in Washington,D.C.And talk about credibility.When this administration says that all options are on the table,they send out senior administration officials that send all these mixed signals.And so in order solve this peacefully,which is everybody's goal,you have to have the ayatollahs change their minds.Look at where they are.They're moving faster toward a nuclear weapon.It's because this administration has no credibility on this issue.It's because this administration watered down sanctions,delayed sanctions,tried to stop us from putting the tough sanctions in place.Now we have them in place because of Congress.They say the military option's on the table but it's not being viewed as credible,and the key is to do this peacefully,is to make sure that we have credibility.Under a Romney administration,we will have credibility on this issue.MS.RADDATZ:Vice President Biden.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Incredible.(Chuckles.)Look,imagine had we let the Republican Congress work out the sanctions.You think there's any possibility the entire world would have joined us,Russia and China,all of our allies?These are the most crippling sanctions in the history of sanctions,period,period.When Governor Romney's asked about it,he said,we got to keep these sanctions.When they said,well,you're talking about doing more,what are you—are you—you're going to go to war?Is that you want to do now?REP.RYAN:We want to prevent war!VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:(Inaudible)—and I—the interesting thing is,how they're going to prevent war.How are they going to prevent war if they say that there's nothing more that we—that they say we should do than what we've already done,number one?And number two,with regard to the ability of the United States to take action militarily,it is—it is not in my purview to talk about classified information.But we feel quite confident we could deal a serious blow to the Iranians.But number two,the Iranians are—the Israelis and the United States—our military and intelligence communities are absolutely the same exact place in terms of how close—how close the Iranians are to getting a nuclear weapon.They are a good way away.There is no difference between our view and theirs.When my friend talks about fissile material,they have to take this highly enriched uranium,get it from20percent up.Then they have to be able to have something to put it in.There is no weapon that the Iranians have at this point.Both the Israelis and we know we'll know if they start the process of building a weapon.So all this bluster I keep hearing,all this loose talk—what are they talking about?Are you talking about to be more credible?What—what morecan the president do?Stand before the United Nations,tell the whole world,directly communicate to the ayatollah:We will not let them acquire a nuclear weapon,period,unless he's talking about going to war.REP.RYAN:Martha,let's just—MS.RADDATZ:Congressman Ryan.REP.RYAN:—let's look at this from the view of the ayatollahs.What do they see?They see this administration trying to water down sanctions in Congress for over two years.They're moving faster toward a nuclear weapon;they're spinning the centrifuges faster.They see us saying,when we come into the administration,when they're sworn in,we need more space with our ally Israel.They see President Obama in New York City the same day Bibi Netanyahu is,and he's—instead of meeting with him goes on a—on a daily talk show.They see—when we say that these options are on the table,the secretary of defense walked them back. They are not changing their mind.That's what we have to do,is change their mind so they stop pursuing nuclear weapons,and they're going faster.MS.RADDATZ:How will you do it so quickly?Look,you both saw Benjamin Netanyahu hold up that picture of a bomb with the red line and talking about the red line being in spring.So can you solve this—if the Romney-Ryan ticket is elected,can you solve this in two months before spring and avoid nuclear—REP.RYAN:We—we can debate a timeline.MS.RADDATZ:(Inaudible.)REP.RYAN:We can debate the timeline,whether there's—it's that short a time or longer.I —I agree that it's probably longer.Number two,it's all about credibility.MS.RADDATZ:You don't agree with that bomb and what the Israelis—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:No,look—(inaudible)—REP.RYAN:(Inaudible)—look,we—we both—(inaudible)—MS.RADDATZ:Vice President Biden.REP.RYAN:I don't want to go into classified stuff,but we both agree that to do this peacefully, you've got to get them to change their minds.They're not changing their minds,and look at what this administration does—MS.RADDATZ:But what do you do—(inaudible)—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Let me tell you what the ayatollah sees.REP.RYAN:You have to have credibility.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:The ayatollah sees his economy being crippled.The ayatollah sees that there are50percent fewer exports of oil.He sees the currency going into the tank. He sees the economy going into free fall,and he sees the world for the first time totally united in opposition to him getting a nuclear weapon.Now,with regard to Bibi,he's been my friend for39years.The president has met with Bibi a dozen times.He's spoken to Bibi Netanyahu as much as he's spoken to anybody.The idea that we're not—I was in a—just before he went to the U.N.,I was in a conference call with the—with the president,with him talking to Bibi,for well over an hour in—in—in—in—in stark relief and detail about what was going on.This is a bunch of stuff.Look,here's the deal —MS.RADDATZ:What does that mean,"a bunch of stuff"?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Well,it means it's simply inaccurate.REP.RYAN:It's Irish.(Chuckles.)VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:It is.(Laughter.)We Irish call it malarkey.MS.RADDATZ:Thanks for the translation.OK.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:No,we Irish call it malarkey.(Laughter.)But last thing:the secretary of defense has made it absolutely clear.He didn't walk anything back.We will not allow the Iranians to get a nuclear weapon.What Bibi held up there was when they get to the point where they can enrich uranium enough to put into a weapon,they don't have a weapon to put it into.Let's all calm down a little bit here.Iran is more isolated today than when we took office.It was on the ascendancy when we took office.It is totally isolated.MS.RADDATZ:Congressman Ryan—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:I don't know what world you guys are in.MS.RADDATZ:Congressman Ryan—REP.RYAN:Thank—thank heavens we have these sanctions in place.It's in spite of their opposition.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:(Chuckles.)Oh,God.REP.RYAN:They have given20waivers to this sanction.And all I have to point to are the results.They're four years closer toward a nuclear weapon.I think that case speaks for itself.MS.RADDATZ:Can you tell the American people what's worse—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:By the way,they're—no,no,they are not four years closer to a nuclear weapon.MS.RADDATZ:—another war in the Middle East or—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:They're—they're closer to being able to get enough fissile material to put in a weapon if they had a weapon.But—MS.RADDATZ:You're acting a little bit like they don't want one,though.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Oh,I didn't say—no,I'm not saying—(look?),facts matter, Martha.You're a foreign policy expert.Facts matter.All this loose talk about them—all they have to do is get to—enrich uranium in a certain amount and they have a weapon—not true. Not true.They are more—and if we ever have to take action,unlike where we took office,we will have the world behind us,and that matters.That matters.MS.RADDATZ:What about Bob Gates'statement?Let me read that again:"Could prove catastrophic,haunting us for generations."VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:He is right.It could prove catastrophic if we do—we do it with—(inaudible)—MS.RADDATZ:Congressman Ryan?REP.RYAN:And what it does is it—and it undermines our credibility by backing up the point when we make it that all options are on the table.That's the point.The ayatollahs see thesekinds of statements,and they think,I'm going to get a nuclear weapon.When—when we see the kind of equivocation that took place because this administration wanted a precondition policy—so when the Green Revolution started up,they were silent for nine days.When they see us putting—when they see us putting daylight between ourselves and our allies in Israel, that gives them encouragement.When they see Russia watering down any further sanctions —and the only reason we got a U.N.sanction is because Russia watered it down and prevented these—(there?)from being sanctions in the first place.So when they see this kind of activity,they are encouraged to continue,and that's the problem.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Martha,let me tell you what Russia's—(inaudible)—MS.RADDATZ:What—let me ask you what's worse:war in the Middle East,another war in the Middle East,or a nuclear-armed Iran?REP.RYAN:I'll tell you what's worse.I'll tell you what's worse.MS.RADDATZ:Quickly.REP.RYAN:A nuclear-armed Iran,which triggers a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. This is the world's largest sponsor of—of terrorism.They've dedicated themselves—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:That's the only thing my—REP.RYAN:—to wiping an entire country off the map.They call us the Great Satan.And if they get nuclear weapons,other people in the neighborhood will pursue their nuclear weapons as well.MS.RADDATZ:Vice President Biden.REP.RYAN:We can't live with that.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:War should always be the absolute last resort.That's why these crippling sanctions,what Bibi Netanyahu says we should continue—which,if I'm not mistaken, Governor Romney says we—we should continue.If I—I may be mistaken;he changes his mind so often,I could be wrong.But the fact of the matter is,he says they're working.And the fact is that they are being crippled by them.And we've made it clear,big nations can't bluff. This president doesn't bluff.MS.RADDATZ:Gentlemen,I want to bring the conversation to a different kind of national security issue,the state of our economy.The number one issue here at home is jobs.Thepercentage of unemployed just fell below8percent for the first time in43months.The Obama administration had projected that it would fall below6percent now after the addition of close to a trillion dollars in stimulus money.So will both of you level with the American people?Can you get unemployment to under6percent,and how long will it take?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:I don't know how long it will take.MS.RADDATZ:Vice President Biden.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:We can and we will get it under6percent.Let's look at the—let's take a look at the facts.Let's look at where we were when we came to office.The economy was in free fall.We had—the Great Recession hit.Nine million people lost their job,1.7—$1.6trillion in wealth lost in equity in your homes,in retirement accounts from the middle class.We knew we had to act for the middle class.We immediately went out and rescued General Motors.We went ahead and made sure that we cut taxes for the middle class.And in addition to that,when that—and when that occurred,what did Romney do?Romney said,no,let Detroit go bankrupt.We moved in and helped people refinance their ernor Romney said,no,let foreclosures hit the bottom.But it shouldn't be surprising for a guy who says47percent of the American people are unwilling to take responsibility for their own lives.My friend recently,in a speech in Washington,said30%of the American people are takers.These people are my mom and dad, the people I grew up with,my neighbors.They pay more effective tax than Governor Romney pays in his federal income tax.They are elderly people who in fact are living off of Social Security.They are veterans and people fighting in Afghanistan right now who are,quote,not paying any taxes.I've had it up to here with this notion that47percent—it's about time they take some responsibility here.And instead of signing pledges to Grover Norquist not to ask the wealthiest among us to contribute to bring back the middle class,they should be signing a pledge saying to the middle class,we're going to level the playing field.We're going to give you a fair shot again.We are going to not repeat the mistakes we made in the past by having a different set of rules for Wall Street and Main Street,making sure that we continue to hemorrhage these tax cuts for the superwealthy.They're pushing the continuation of a tax cut that will give an additional$500billion in tax cuts to120,000families.And they're holding hostage the middle-class tax cut because they say,we won't pass—we won't continue the middle-class tax cut unless you give the tax cut for the superwealthy.It's about time they take some responsibility.MS.RADDATZ:Mr.Ryan.REP.RYAN:Joe and I are from similar towns.He's from Scranton,Pennsylvania.I'm from Janesville,Wisconsin.You know what the unemployment rate in Scranton is today?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:I sure do.REP.RYAN:It's10percent.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Yeah.REP.RYAN:You know what it was the day you guys came in?VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:No.REP.RYAN:Eight-point-five percent.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:Yeah.REP.RYAN:That's how it's going all around America.Look—VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:You don't read the statistics.That's not"how it's going."It's going down.MS.RADDATZ:(Inaudible)—two-minute answer,please.REP.RYAN:Look—(chuckles)—did they come in and inherit a tough situation?Absolutely.VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN:(Chuckles.)REP.RYAN:But we're going in the wrong direction!Look at where we are.The economy is barely limping along.It's growing at1.3percent.That's slower than it grew last year,and last year was slower than the year before.Job growth in September was slower than it was in August,and August was slower than it was in July.We're heading in the wrong direction.。
ACFE全球舞弊调研--2012-rttn
schemes were by far the most common type of occupational fraud, comprising 87% of the cases reported to us; they were also the least costly form of fraud, with a median loss of $120,000.
• The vast majority (77%) of all frauds in our study
were committed by individuals working in one of six departments: accounting, operations, sales, executive/upper management, customer service and purchasing. This distribution was very similar to what we found in our 2010 study.
©2012 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
7
Executive Summary
• The longer a perpetrator has worked for an
organization, the higher fraud losses tend to be. Perpetrators with more than ten years of experience at the victim organization caused a median loss of $229,000. By comparison, the median loss caused by perpetrators who committed fraud in their first year on the job was only $25,n of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
人力资源管理理论与实务(曾建权)
EMBA 2012?从??心理学开始 l??????心理学研究??人类的??行为、认知、情绪、与动机 l??????工业??心理学研究??人员在??工作环境的??行为、认知、情绪、与动机,包括个??人功能个??人??心理过程群体过程 ??工作条件与环境 ?清华大学-北卡罗??纳大学EMBA 2012 Tsinghua-UNC EMBA 2012?112/12/15 ??心理学的早期历史 l????起源??自??二??十世纪初的实验??心理学 n??????工业与组织??心理学之??父 Hugo Munsterberg:应??用??心理测验 Walter Dill Scott:????广告理论 n????泰勒(Federick Winslow Taylor) 科学管理??工作研究动作研究? 清华大学-北卡罗??纳大学EMBA 2012 Tsinghua-UNC EMBA 2012?知觉研究外部世界物理属性的改变与相应的心理体验之间的关系的学科,叫做心理物理学(Psychophysics)。
•感觉(sensation)是对物理世界的能量的初始探测。
•知觉(perception)是对感觉到的事物的解释,也被称为认知过程(cognitive processing)•? 清华大学-北卡罗??纳大学EMBA 2012 Tsinghua-UNC EMBA2012?212/12/15 斯特鲁普效应-stroop effect•黄蓝橙黑红绿紫黄红橙绿黑蓝红紫绿蓝橙右脑主管说出颜色,但是左脑坚持会读字本身的读音••? 清华大学-北卡罗??纳大学EMBA 2012 Tsinghua-UNC EMBA2012?什么影响知觉? l????生理影响•感觉,年龄,健康,疲劳,饥饿,生理周期•l????社会影响•文化差异•非言语行为,气味,空间•社会角色•性别角色,职业角色•自我概念•自尊,控制点,归因方式•2012?312/12/15 选择性:对象和背景•容易多了吧•412/12/15 ? 清华大学-北卡罗??纳大学EMBA 2012 Tsinghua-UNC EMBA 2012?512/12/15 知觉的理解性特征• 612/12/15 先前经验会影响知觉•我们习惯了人们正立的脸,当脸正立的时候,我们可以很轻易的察觉细微的差异,例如表情等变化。
2012考研英语一作文
2012考研英语一作文Certainly! Let's get started.---。
Title: The Importance of Cross-Cultural Communicationin the Globalized World。
In today's interconnected world, cross-cultural communication has become more crucial than ever before.With globalization breaking down barriers between nations and cultures, individuals and organizations areincreasingly finding themselves in diverse environments where effective communication across cultures is essential. In this essay, we will explore the significance of cross-cultural communication and discuss strategies to improve it.Firstly, cross-cultural communication fosters mutual understanding and respect among people from different cultural backgrounds. In a globalized workforce,individuals often collaborate with colleagues, clients, and partners who come from diverse cultural contexts. By understanding and appreciating each other's cultural norms, values, and communication styles, individuals can build stronger relationships and work together more effectively.Moreover, cross-cultural communication is essential for businesses operating in the global marketplace. Companies that can communicate effectively across cultures gain a competitive edge by expanding their market reach andforging international partnerships. However, misunderstandings arising from cultural differences canlead to costly errors and jeopardize business relationships. Therefore, businesses must invest in training employees to navigate cultural nuances and adapt their communication strategies accordingly.In addition, cross-cultural communication plays a vital role in promoting diversity and inclusion in society. By embracing cultural differences and fostering open dialogue, communities can create more inclusive environments where individuals from all backgrounds feel valued and respected.This inclusivity not only enriches society but also contributes to social harmony and cohesion.Despite its importance, cross-cultural communication can be challenging due to differences in language, customs, and communication styles. However, there are several strategies that individuals can employ to enhance their cross-cultural communication skills.Firstly, active listening is key to understanding and interpreting messages accurately across cultures. Rather than making assumptions or jumping to conclusions, individuals should listen attentively to what others are saying and ask clarifying questions when necessary. This demonstrates respect for the speaker and helps to avoid misunderstandings.Secondly, individuals should strive to develop cultural intelligence, which involves being aware of one's own cultural biases and being open to learning about other cultures. By actively seeking to understand and appreciate cultural differences, individuals can build trust andrapport with people from diverse backgrounds.Thirdly, flexibility and adaptability are essential traits for effective cross-cultural communication. Individuals should be willing to adjust their communication style and behavior to accommodate the cultural norms of others. This may involve using simpler language, avoiding sensitive topics, or modifying nonverbal cues to align with cultural expectations.In conclusion, cross-cultural communication is indispensable in today's globalized world. By fostering mutual understanding, driving business success, and promoting diversity and inclusion, effective cross-cultural communication enriches both individuals and societies. By embracing cultural differences and employing strategies to enhance communication across cultures, we can build a more interconnected and harmonious world.--。
功能性便秘-罗马IV新看点PPT
功能性便秘的治疗
一般措施 作用于外周的药物 渗透性泻剂 容积性泻剂 刺激性泻剂 促分泌剂 胆汁酸调节剂 灌肠和经直肠清洗 作用于全身的药物 促动力剂 补充和替代治疗 手术
Douglas A. Drossman, 等. 罗马IV: 功能性胃肠病[M]. 科学出版社, 202X: 650-653.
功能性便秘— 罗马Ⅳ新热点
罗马Ⅳ:功能性便秘的定义
功能性便秘(functional constipation, FC)属于功能性肠病 的一种,主要表现:
排便困难 排便次数减少 排便不尽感 诊断前症状出现至少6个月,近3个月内存在症状; 不符合IBS(肠易激综合征)的诊断标准 患者可能存在腹痛和(或)腹胀症状,但这些并不是主要症
Data on 醇
肠道排空运行方向
横结肠
升结肠 逆重排空
降结肠
乙状结肠
一项随机、双盲、交叉研究,纳入10名健康志愿者,接受乳果糖10g bid po或聚乙二醇10g bid po,治 疗第4天予111铟标记的阳离子交换树脂颗粒胶囊,在第5天,给予99锝标记的试验餐以观察胃、小肠、 结肠传输时间。 结果显示:与PEG(聚乙二醇)相比,常规剂量的乳果糖显著加快升结肠排空。
Jouët P, et al. Effects of therapeutic doses of lactulose vs. polyethylene glycol on isotopic colonic transit[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008, 27(10):988–993.
Suares N C, Ford A C. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. The American journal of gastroenterology, 202X, 106(9): 1582-1591.
2012年英语二第二篇
2012年英语二第二篇English Answer:The article highlights the multifaceted influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in diverse sectors of contemporary society. While AI presents tremendous opportunities for technological advancements and societal benefits, it also raises concerns about ethicalimplications and societal disparities.One of the most significant impacts of AI lies in its potential to augment human capabilities. AI-powered tools have the ability to enhance productivity, improve decision-making, and automate complex tasks. In industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and finance, AI is being used to diagnose diseases, optimize production processes, and streamline financial operations. By reducing human error and increasing efficiency, AI has the potential to spark unprecedented technological breakthroughs and economic growth. However, it is crucial to strike a balance betweenautomation and human expertise to ensure that AI complements rather than replaces human labor.Simultaneously, AI raises concerns about ethical implications. As AI systems become more sophisticated, they may possess the ability to make complex decisions that have significant consequences. The question arises: who is ultimately responsible for the actions taken by AI algorithms? Ethical guidelines and regulations need to be established to ensure that AI is used responsibly and in alignment with human values. Additionally, there is a risk of bias in AI systems, which can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. Careful consideration must be given to the data used to train AI models and the algorithms employed to make decisions.Furthermore, AI's impact on society raises questions of equity and inclusion. While AI can drive innovation and economic growth, it has the potential to exacerbateexisting societal disparities. Unequal access to AI technologies and the digital divide may lead to further marginalization of disadvantaged communities. Governmentsand organizations must work together to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared equitably and that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the digital economy.In conclusion, the advent of AI brings both profound opportunities and challenges to modern society. As we navigate the complexities of AI, it is essential to adopt a nuanced and multifaceted approach. We must harness the potential of AI to advance humanity while addressingethical concerns, minimizing societal disparities, and ensuring that AI serves the greater good.中文回答:人工智能(AI)对当代社会各行各业的影响是多方面的。
2023不同机制便秘药物的临床应用(全文)
2023不同机制便秘药物的临床应用(全文)便挝、是指一种(组)临床症状,表现为排便困难和/或排便次数减少、粪便干硬,排便次数减少指每周排便少于3次;排便困难包括排便费力、排出困难、排便不尽感、排便费时以及需手法辅助排便1。
以上症状出现至少6个月则为慢性便秘1。
随着我国人口老龄化社会的到来及生活方式的变革,可以预见慢性便秘的患病率将持续增多。
那么,慢性便秘对国民健康产生哪些危害,||备床中又该如何合理应用不同机制的便秘药物呢?带着上述疑问,让我们一起盘点下当前治疗慢性便秘药物的临床应用。
剖析利害:重视慢性便秘的危害慢性便秘作为临床胃肠病学的重要组成部分,在全球范围内较为普遍。
研究显示,欧美国家慢性便秘的患病率高达14%~30%2。
但较于西方发达国家,虽然我国成年人慢性便秘的患病率较低,为4%~10%,但随着年龄的增长,患病率也会随之升高,尤真是60岁以上人群慢性便秘患病率可高达22%3。
因此,我国慢性便秘的疾病负坦与危害不窑小觑。
慢性便秘虽不危及生命,但反复发作可直接降低患者的生活质量,而真引起的如高血压以及排便用力情况下诱发的急性心脑血筐疾病等非胃肠道并发症和胃炎、胃食筐皮流、痒疮等胃肠道并发症也严重影响患者的健康4。
此外,虽然慢性便秘在理论上不会增加病死率,但有研究显示,长期便秘患者的总病死率要高于无便秘患者s.慢性便秘的影响不仅仅损害患者的躯体健康,还会诱发精禅心理异常、降低生命质量,增加个人和社会的医疗、经济负担。
聚焦临床:规范化、合理化治疗慢性便秘根据病情的严重程度,便秘分为轻、中、重度三型。
轻度便秘不影响日常生活,通过整体调整、短时间用药即可恢复;而重度便秘的症状重旦持续,严重影响工作、生活,需用药物治疗,不能停药或药物治疗无效1。
但由于泻药滥用、缺乏规范诊疗意识,慢性便秘病程往往迁延难愈。
因此,合理选择慢性便秘药物,成为优化治疗的可靠手段!目前,国内再多种药物可用于慢性便秘的治疗。
根据药物的作用机制,治疗慢性便秘的药物大致分为通便药、促动力药、促分泌剂、益生菌/益生元以及溜君药和栓剂1。
Multimode Resonances in Silver Nanocuboids
INTRODUCTION A plasmon resonance can be excited on a metallic nanostructure when it is illuminated with light of an appropriate wavelength and polarization. Such resonances take the form of a coupling between the free electrons of the nanostructure and the electromagnetic oscillation of the light. This phenomenon is responsible for a wide range of interesting optical effects because it is associated with enhanced absorption, scattering, and extinction of the light. Plasmon resonances in gold nanospheres, nanoshells, and nanorods have been extensively investigated, and have already been exploited in diverse technological contexts.1−8 Unlike gold, silver readily crystallizes as cube-shaped nanoparticles.9,10 Silver nanostructures have very strong plasmon resonances in their own right, with the peak extinction for a suspension of silver nanospheres in water, for example, at about 390 nm, compared to that of gold nanospheres at about 520 nm. Furthermore, under the right conditions, silver can be deposited onto an existing gold nanostructure to produce a gold@silver core−shell structure. Deposition of silver onto gold nanospheres has been well-studied in the past,11−13 and the resulting particle generally follows the spherical shape of the gold core. On the other hand, deposition of silver, or some other element, onto a gold nanorod core offers increased geometric flexibility, because gold nanorods can readily be produced with a controlled size and aspect ratio. Most studies report a rodlike symmetry in the resulting hybrid nanoparticle
2012美国总统大选首场辩论
2012美国总统大选首场辩论(中文字幕完整版)美国大选首场辩论文本(转自CNN)(APPLAUSE) JIM LEHRER: Thirty seconds, folks. Let's have a terrific evening, for all of you and for our country. Good evening from the Magness Arena at the University of Denver in Denver, Colorado. I'm Jim Lehrer of the "PBS NewsHour," and I welcome you to the first of the 2012 presidential debates between President Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee.This debate and the next three -- two presidential, one vice presidential -- are sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Tonight's 90 minutes will be about domestic issues and will follow a format designed by the commission. There will be six roughly 15-minute segments with two-minute answers for the first question, then open discussion for the remainder of each segment. Thousands of people offered suggestions on segment subjects or questions via the Internet and other means, but I made the final selections. And for the record, they were not submitted for approval to the commission or the candidates. The segments as I announced in advance will be three on the economy and one each on health care, the role of government and governing, with an emphasis throughout on differences, specifics and choices. Both candidates will also have two-minute closing statements. The audience here in the hall has promised to remain silent -- no cheers, applause, boos, hisses, among other noisy distracting things, so we may all concentrate on what the candidates have to say. There is a noise exception right now, though, as we welcome President Obama and Governor Romney. (APPLAUSE) Gentlemen, welcome to you both. Let's start the economy, segment one, and let's begin with jobs. What are the major differences between the two of you about how you would go about creating new jobs?You have two minutes. Each of you have two minutes to start. A coin toss has determined, Mr. President, you go first.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, thank you very much, Jim, for this opportunity. I want to thank Governor Romney and the University of Denver for your hospitality. There are a lot of points I want to make tonight, but the most important one is that 20 years ago I became the luckiest man on Earth because Michelle Obama agreed to marry me. And so I just want to wish, Sweetie, you happy anniversary and let you know that a year from now we will not be celebrating it in front of 40 million people. (LAUGHTER) You know, four years ago we went through the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Millions of jobs were lost, the auto industry was on the brink of collapse. The financial system had frozen up. And because of the resilience and the determination of the American people, we've begun to fight our way back. Over the last 30 months, we've seen 5 million jobs in the private sector created. The auto industry has come roaring back. And housing has begun to rise. But we all know that we've still got a lot of work to do. And so the question here tonight is not where we've been, but where we're going. Governor Romney has a perspective that says if we cut taxes, skewed towards the wealthy, and roll back regulations, that we'll be better off. I've got a different view. I think we've got to invest in education and training. I think it's important for us to develop new sources of energy here in America, that we change our tax code to make sure that we're helping small businesses and companies that are investing here in the United States, that we take some of the money that we're saving as we wind down two wars to rebuild America and that we reduce our deficit in a balanced way that allows us to make these critical investments. Now, it ultimately is going to be up to the voters, to you, which path we should take. Are we going to double-down on the top-down economic policies that helped to get us into this mess? Or do we embrace a new economic patriotism that saysAmerica does best when the middle class does best? And I'm looking forward to having that debate.LEHRER: Governor Romney, two minutes.GOV. MITT ROMNEY: Thank you, Jim. It's an honor to be here with you, and I appreciate the chance to be with the president. I'm pleased to be at the University of Denver, appreciate their welcome, and also the presidential commission on these debates. And congratulations to you, Mr. President, on your anniversary. I'm sure this was the most romantic place you could imagine here -- here with me. So I... (LAUGHTER) Congratulations. This is obviously a very tender topic. I've had the occasion over the last couple of years of meeting people across the country. I was in Dayton, Ohio, and a woman grabbed my arm, and she said, "I've been out of work since May. Can you help me?" Ann yesterday was at a rally in Denver, and a woman came up to her with a baby in her arms, and said, "Ann, my husband has had four jobs in three years, part-time jobs. He's lost his most recent job. And we've now just lost our home. Can you help us?" And the answer is, yes, we can help, but it's going to take a different path, not the one we've been on, not the one the president describes as a top-down, cut taxes for the rich. That's not what I'm going to do. My plan has five basic parts. One, get us energy independent, North American energy independent. That creates about 4 million jobs. Number two, open up more trade, particularly in Latin America, crack down on China, if and when they cheat. Number three, make sure our people have the skills they need to succeed and the best schools in the world. We're a far way from that now. Number four, get us to a balanced budget. Number five, champion small business. It's small business that creates the jobs in America. And over the last four years, small- business people have decided that America may not be the place toopen a new business, because new business startups are down to a 30-year low. I know what it takes to get small business growing again, to hire people.ROMNEY: Now, I'm concerned that the path that we're on has just been unsuccessful. The president has a view very similar to the view he had when he ran four years, that a bigger government, spending more, taxing more, regulating more -- if you will, trickle-down government -- would work. That's not the right answer for America. I'll restore the vitality that gets America working again. Thank you. LEHRER: Mr. President, please respond directly to what the governor just said about trickle-down -- his trick-down approach, as he said yours is. OBAMA: Well, let me talk specifically about what I think we need to do. First, we've got to improve our education system and we've made enormous progress drawing on ideas both from Democrats and Republicans that are already starting to show gains in some of the toughest to deal with schools. We've got a program called Race to the Top that has prompted reforms in 46 states around the country, raising standards, improving how we train teachers. So now I want to hire another 100,000 new math and science teachers, and create 2 million more slots in our community colleges so that people can get trained for the jobs that are out there right now. And I want to make sure that we keep tuition low for our young people. When it comes to our tax code, Governor Romney and I both agree that our corporate tax rate is too high, so I want to lower it, particularly for manufacturing, taking it down to 25 percent. But I also want to close those loopholes that are giving incentives for companies that are shipping jobs overseas. I want to provide tax breaks for companies that are investing here in the United States. On energy, Governor Romney and I, we both agree that we've got to boost American energy production, and oil and natural gas production are higher than they've been in years. But I also believe that we've got to look at the energy sources of the future, like wind and solar and biofuels, and make those investments. So all ofthis is possible. Now, in order for us to do it, we do have to close our deficit, and one of the things I'm sure we'll be discussing tonight is, how do we deal with our tax code? And how do we make sure that we are reducing spending in a responsible way, but also, how do we have enough revenue to make those investments? And this is where there's a difference, because Governor Romney's central economic plan calls for a $5 trillion tax cut -- on top of the extension of the Bush tax cuts -- that's another trillion dollars -- and $2 trillion in additional military spending that the military the deficit, and make the investments that we need to make, without dumping those costs onto middle-class Americans, I think is one of the central questions of this campaign. LEHRER: Both of you have spoken about a lot of different things, and we're going to try to get through them in as specific a way as we possibly can. But, first, Governor Romney, do you have a question that you'd like to ask the president directly about something he just said? ROMNEY: Well, sure. I'd like to clear up the record and go through it piece by piece. First of all, I don't have a $5 trillion tax cut. I don't have a tax cut of a scale that you're talking about. My view is that we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class. But I'm not going to reduce the share of taxes paid byhigh-income people. High-income people are doing just fine in this economy. They'll do fine whether you're president or I am. The people who are having the hard time right now are middle- income Americans. Under the president's policies, middle-income Americans have been buried. They're just being crushed. Middle- income Americans have seen their income come down by $4,300. This is a -- this is a tax in and of itself. I'll call it the economy tax. It's been crushing. At the same time, gasoline prices have doubled under the president. Electric rates are up. Food prices are up. Health care costs have gone up by $2,500 a family.Middle-income families are being crushed.ROMNEY: And so the question is how to get them going again. And I've described it. It's energy and trade, the right kind of training programs, balancing our budget and helping small business. Those are the -- the cornerstones of my plan. But the president mentioned a couple of other ideas I'll just note. First, education. I agree: Education is key, particularly the future of our economy. But our training programs right now, we've got 47 of them, housed in the federal government, reporting to eight different agencies. Overhead is overwhelming. We've got to get those dollars back to the states and go to the workers so they can create their own pathways to get in the training they need for jobs that will really help them. The second area, taxation, we agree, we ought to bring the tax rates down. And I do, both for corporations and for individuals. But in order for us not to lose revenue, have the government run out of money, I also lower deductions and credits and exemptions, so that we keep taking in the same money when you also account for growth. The third area, energy. Energy is critical, and the president pointed out correctly that production of oil and gas in the U.S. is up. But not due to his policies.In spite of his policies. Mr. President, all of the increase in natural gas and oil has happened on private land, not on government land. On government land, your administration has cut the number of permits and licenses in half. If I'm president, I'll double them, and also get the -- the oil from offshore and Alaska. And I'll bring that pipeline in from Canada. And, by the way, I like coal. I'm going to make sure we can continue to burn clean coal. People in the coal industry feel like it's getting crushed by your policies. I want to get America and North America energy independent so we can create those jobs. And finally, with regards to that tax cut, look, I'm not looking to cut massive taxes and to reduce the -- the revenues going to the government. My -- my number-one principal is, there will be no tax cut that adds to the deficit. I want to underline that: no tax cut that adds to the deficit. But I do want to reduce the burden being paid by middle-income Americans. And I -- and to dothat, that also means I cannot reduce the burden paid by high-income Americans. So any -- any language to the contrary is simply not accurate. LEHRER: Mr. President? OBAMA: Well, I think -- let's talk about taxes, because I think it's instructive. Now, four years ago, when I stood on this stage, I said that I would cut taxes for middle-class families. And that's exactly what I did. We cut taxes for middle-class families by about $3,600. And the reason is, because I believe that we do best when the middle class is doing well. And by giving them those tax cuts, they had a little more money in their pocket, and so maybe they can buy a new car. They are certainly in a better position to weather the extraordinary recession that we went through. They can buy a computer for their kid who's going off to college, which means they're spending more money, businesses have more customers, businesses make more profits, and then hire more workers. Now, Governor Romney's proposal that he has been promoting for 18 months calls for a $5 trillion tax cut, on top of $2 trillion of additional spending for our military. And he is saying that he is going to pay for it by closing loopholes and deductions. The problem deductions and loopholes, and he hasn't been able to identify them. But I'm going to make an important point here, Jim. LEHRER: All right. OBAMA: When you add up all the loopholes and deductions that upper-income individuals can -- are currently taking advantage of, you take those all away, you don't come close to paying for $5 trillion in tax cuts and $2 trillion in additional military spending.OBAMA: And that's why independent studies looking at this said the only way to meet Governor Romney's pledge of not reducing the deficit or -- or -- or not adding to the deficitis by burdening middle-class families. The average middle-class family with children would pay about $2,000 more. Now, that's not my analysis. That's the analysis of economists who have looked at this. And -- and that kind of top -- top-down economics, where folks at the top are doing well, so the average person making $3 million is getting a $250,000 tax break,while middle-class families are burdened further, that's not what I believe is a recipe for economic growth. LEHRER: All right. What is the difference? Let's just stay on taxes. (CROSSTALK)LEHRER: Just -- let's just stay on taxes for (inaudible). (CROSSTALK)LEHRER: What is the difference...ROMNEY: Well, but -- but virtually -- virtually everything he just said about my tax plan is inaccurate.LEHRER: All right.ROMNEY: So if the tax plan he described were a tax plan I was trillion tax cut. What I've said is I won't put in place a tax cut that adds to the deficit. That's part one. So there's no economist that can say Mitt Romney's tax plan adds $5 trillion if I say I will not add to the deficit with my tax plan. Number two, I will not reduce the share paid by high-income individuals. I know that you and your running mate keep saying that and I know it's a popular thing to say with a lot of people, but it's just not the case. Look, I've got five boys.I'm used to people saying something that's not always true, but just keep on repeating it and ultimately hoping I'll believe it. But that -- that is not the case.All right? I will not reduce the taxes paid by high-income Americans. And number three, I will not under any circumstances raise taxes on middle-income families. I will lower taxes on middle-income families. Now, you cite a study. There are six other studies that looked at the study you describe and say it's completely wrong. I saw a study that came out today that said you're going to raise taxes by $3,000 to $4,000 on middle-income families. There are all these studies out there. But let's get at the bottom line. That is, I want to bring down rates. I want to bring the rates down, atthe same time lower deductions and exemptions and credits and so forth, so we keep getting the revenue we need. And you'd think, well, then why lower the rates? ROMNEY: And the reason is because small business pays that individual rate; 54 percent of America's workers work in businesses that are taxed not at the corporate tax rate, but at the individual tax rate. And if we lower that rate, they will be able to hire more people. For me, this is about jobs. This is about getting jobs for the American people. (CROSSTALK)LEHRER: That's where we started. Yeah. Do you challenge what the governor just said about his own plan?OBAMA: Well, for 18 months he's been running on this tax plan. And now, five weeks before the election, he's saying that his big, bold idea is, "Never mind." And the fact is that if you are lowering the rates the way you described, Governor, then it is not possible to come up with enough deductions and loopholes that only affect high-income individuals to avoid either raising the deficit or burdening the middle class. It's -- it's math. It's arithmetic. Now, Governor Romney and I do share a deep interest in encouraging small-business growth. So at the same time that my tax plan has already lowered taxes for 98 percent of families, I also lowered taxes for small businesses 18 times. And what I want to do is continue the tax rates -- the tax cuts that we put into place for small businesses and families. But I have said that for incomes over $250,000 a year, that we should go back to the rates that we had when Bill Clinton was president, when we created 23 million new jobs, went from deficit to surplus, and created a whole lot of millionaires to boot. And the reason this is important is because by doing that, we cannot only reduce the deficit, we cannot only encourage job growth through small businesses, but we're also able to make the investments that are necessary in education or in energy.And we do have a difference, though, when it comes to definitions of small business. Under -- under my plan, 97 percent of small businesses would not see their income taxes go up. Governor Romney says, well, those top 3 percent, they're the job creators, they'd be burdened. But under Governor Romney's definition, there are a whole bunch of millionaires and billionaires who are small businesses. Donald Trump is a small business. Now, I know Donald Trump doesn't like to think of himself as small anything, but -- but that's how you define small businesses if you're getting business income. And that kind of approach, I believe, will not grow our economy, because the only way to pay for it without either burdening the middle class or blowing up our deficit is to make drastic cuts in things like education, making sure that we are continuing to invest in basic science and research, all the things that are helping America grow. And I think that would be a mistake. LEHRER: All right.ROMNEY: Jim, let me just come back on that -- on that point, which is these... LEHRER: Just for the -- just for record... (CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: ... the small businesses we're talking about...LEHRER: Excuse me. Excuse me. Just so everybody understands, we're way over our first 15 minutes.ROMNEY: It's fun, isn't it? LEHRER: It's OK, it's great. No problem. Well, you all don't have -- you don't have a problem, I don't have a problem, because we're still on the economy. We're going to come back to taxes. I want move on to the deficit and a lot of other things, too. OK, but go ahead, sir.ROMNEY: You bet. Well, President, you're -- Mr. President, you're absolutely right, which is that, with regards to 97 percent of the businesses are not -- not taxed at the 35 percent tax rate, they're taxed at a lower rate. But those businesses that are in the last 3 percent of businesses happen to employ half -- half of all the people who work in small business. Those are the businesses that employ one-quarter of all the workers in America. And your plan is to take their tax rate from 35 percent to 40 percent. Now, and -- and I've talked to a guy who has a very small business. He's in the electronics business in -- in St. Louis. He has four employees. He said he and his son calculated how much they pay in taxes, federal income tax, federal payroll tax, state income tax, state sales tax, state property tax, gasoline tax. It added up to well over 50 percent of what they earned. And your plan is to take the tax rate on successful small businesses from 35 percent to 40 percent. The National Federation of Independent Businesses has said that will cost 700,000 jobs. I don't want to cost jobs. My priority is jobs. And so what I do is I bring down the tax rates, lower deductions and exemptions, the same idea behind Bowles-Simpson, by the way, get the rates down, lower deductions and exemptions, to create more jobs, because there's nothing better for getting us to a balanced budget than having more people working, earning more money, paying more taxes. That's by far the most effective and efficient way to get this budget balanced. OBAMA: Jim, I -- you may want to move onto another topic, but I -- I would just say this to the American people. If you believe that we can cut taxes by $5 trillion and add $2 trillion in additional spending that the military is not asking for, $7 trillion -- just to ROMNEY: We didn't put in place a board that can tell people ultimately what treatments they're going to receive. We didn't also do something that I think a number of people across this country recognize, which is put -- put people in a position where they're going to lose the insurance they had and they wanted. Right now, the CBO says up to 20 million people will lose theirinsurance as Obamacare goes into effect next year. And likewise, a study by McKinsey and Company of American businesses said 30 percent of them are anticipating dropping people from coverage. So for those reasons, for the tax, for Medicare, for this board, and for people losing their insurance, this is why the American people don't want Medicare -- don't want Obamacare. It's why Republicans said, do not do this, and the Republicans had -- had the plan. They put a plan out. They put out a plan, a bipartisan plan. It was swept aside. I think something this big, this important has to be done on a bipartisan basis. And we have to have a president who can reach across the aisle and fashion important legislation with the input from both parties. OBAMA: Governor Romney said this has to be done on a bipartisan basis. This was a bipartisan idea. In fact, it was a Republican idea. And Governor Romney at the beginning of this debate wrote and said what we did in Massachusetts could be a model for the nation. And I agree that the Democratic legislators in Massachusetts might have given some advice to Republicans in Congress about how to cooperate, but the fact of the matter is, we used the same advisers, and they say it's the same plan. It -- when Governor Romney talks about this board, for example, unelected board that we've created, what this is, is a group of health care experts, doctors, et cetera, to figure out, how can we reduce the cost of care in the system overall? Because there -- there are two ways of dealing with our health care crisis. One is to simply leave a whole bunch of people uninsured and let them fend for themselves, to let businesses figure out how long they can continue to pay premiums until finally they just give up, and their workers are no longer getting insured, and that's been the trend line. Or, alternatively, we can figure out, how do we make the cost of care more effective? And there are ways of doing it. So at Cleveland Clinic, one of the best health care systems in the world, they actually provide great care cheaper than average. And the reason they do is because they do some smart things. They -- they say, if a patient's coming in, let'sget all the doctors together at once, do one test instead of having the patient run around with 10 tests. Let's make sure that we're providing preventive care so we're catching the onset of something like diabetes. Let's -- let's pay providers on the basis of performance as opposed to on the basis of how many procedures they've -- they've engaged in. Now, so what this board does is basically identifies best practices and says, let's use the purchasing power of Medicare and Medicaid to help to institutionalize all these good things that we do. And the fact of the matter is that, when Obamacare is fully implemented, we're going to be in a position to show that costs are going down. And over the last two years, health care premiums have gone up -- it's true -- but they've gone up slower than any time in the last 50 years. So we're already beginning to see progress. In the meantime, folks out there with insurance, you're already getting a rebate. Let me make one last point. Governor Romney says, we should replace it, I'm just going to repeal it, but -- but we can replace it with something. But the problem is, he hasn't described what exactly we'd replace it with, other than saying we're going to leave it to the states. give you a sense, over 10 years, that's more than our entire defense ROMNEY: We didn't put in place a board that can tell people ultimately what treatments they're going to receive. We didn't also do something that I think a number of people across this country recognize, which is put -- put people in a position where they're going to lose the insurance they had and they wanted. Right now, the CBO says up to 20 million people will lose their insurance as Obamacare goes into effect next year. And likewise, a study by McKinsey and Company of American businesses said 30 percent of them are anticipating dropping people from coverage. So for those reasons, for the tax, for Medicare, for this board, and for people losing their insurance, this is why the American people don't want Medicare -- don't want Obamacare. It's why Republicans said, do not do this, and the Republicans had -- had the plan. They put a plan out. They put out a plan, abipartisan plan. It was swept aside. I think something this big, this important has to be done on a bipartisan basis. And we have to have a president who can reach across the aisle and fashion important legislation with the input from both parties. OBAMA: Governor Romney said this has to be done on a bipartisan basis. This was a bipartisan idea. In fact, it was a Republican idea. And Governor Romney at the beginning of this debate wrote and said what we did in Massachusetts could be a model for the nation. And I agree that the Democratic legislators in Massachusetts might have given some advice to Republicans in Congress about how to cooperate, but the fact of the matter is, we used the same advisers, and they say it's the same plan. It -- when Governor Romney talks about this board, for example, unelected board that we've created, what this is, is a group of health care experts, doctors, et cetera, to figure out, how can we reduce the cost of care in the system overall? Because there -- there are two ways of dealing with our health care crisis. One is to simply leave a whole bunch of people uninsured and let them fend for themselves, to let businesses figure out how long they can continue to pay premiums until finally they just give up, and their workers are no longer getting insured, and that's been the trend line. Or, alternatively, we can figure out, how do we make the cost of care more effective? And there are ways of doing it. So at Cleveland Clinic, one of the best health care systems in the world, they actually provide great care cheaper than average. And the reason they do is because they do some smart things. They -- they say, if a patient's coming in, let's get all the doctors together at once, do one test instead of having the patient run around with 10 tests. Let's make sure that we're providing preventive care so we're catching the onset of something like diabetes. Let's -- let's pay providers on the basis of performance as opposed to on the basis of how many procedures they've -- they've engaged in. Now, so what this board does is basically identifies best practices and says, let's use the purchasing power of Medicare and Medicaid to help to institutionalize all these good things。
高中英语真题-London2012legacythreatenedbycoachingshortag
高中英语真题:London2012legacythreatenedbycoachingshortage's hopes of finishing fourth in the medals table at the London 2012 Olympics could be undermined by a lack of professional coaching, a report published by a sports think tank revealed y esterday.The research, carried out by and chairedby former 1,500m world record holder Steve Cram, says the sporting legacy left by the Games could be in jeopardy unless 250,000 full- and part-time coaching jobs are created.While high-profile sports such as soccer are turning to foreign coaches at both national an d club level, Cram believes the lack of homegrown coaches in all sports must be addressed."The report highlights that unless we can break the culture of ' gentleman amateurism' in sport, we will struggle to become b est in the world," Cram said."As long as we continue to rely on an army of grassroots volunteers, with no clear career progression for homegrown coaches, w e will tend to look to superannuated foreign coaches to fill the top jobs in sport."If we don't act now to stem the endemic culture of volunteeris m in sport, we may have already missed the chance for sporti ng success at London 2012."Senior figures in 12 leading sports were interviewed for the re port by the Sportnation think tank, which found that nearly 70 percent of sports coaches in are volunteers.It said athletics, the blue-ribbon event of the Olympics, has as few as 12 salaried coach es.Cram said there was too much reliance on "white, middle-class men who are giving up a bit of time" and it was vital to s pread the net more widely."You need coaches who are from your background and who y ou identify with, because they are the people who enthuse yo u and give you a bit of vision and a dream," he told Reuters. "I remember my daughter came back from the athletics club a couple of times and said 'Dad, why are all the coaches old m en?'" he added."I said 'well, because they've got the time to do it'." For a 12- or 13-year-old its not a particularly vibrant picture to paint." Poor backgroundCram said coaching had to be made attractive as a career option to entice the sort of people wh o would otherwise be lost to sport."If you are struggling just to make a living and you don't have l ots of time and you have all sorts of other pressures in your lif e, you are not going to look at coaching if there is no chance of it giving you something back," he said.A recent blueprint put forward by Sports Coach , the national coaching foundation, set a target of 42,000 new coaching posi tions by 2016, but the Loughborough research says that figure would be inadequate. It calls for between 160,000 to 233,000 paid positions.Failure to do so, the report says, could exclude those from po or backgrounds becoming involved in coaching and lead to 's sporting talent going abroad.Portsmouth and England goalkeeper David James, who still hopes to be part of Italian F abio Capello's plans for the national team, said could struggle to compete in many s ports unless the level of investment in coaching was improved."The research shows that unless we act now to professionaliz e our coaching system from grassroots to elite sport stars, and draw inspiration al coaches from all sections of society, British teams will conti nue to fall short in international competition," he said.Pat Duffy, the chief executive of Sports Coach , believes that f ourth place at the London 2012 Olympics is achievable, but s ays there is still a long way to go."If we don't put the coaching infrastructure in place we are relying on the odd exceptions ... but t hings are improving. We had excellent results in Sydney and , " he told Reuters recently."We need to make sure the improvements are long-term and sustainable. We are in direct competition with the lik es of France, Italy, Australia and , all of whom have establishe d coaching infrastructure."London2012legacythreatenedbycoachingshortage's hopes of finishing fourth in the medals table at the London 2012 Olympics could be under mined by a lack of professional coaching, a report published by a sports think tank revealed yesterday.The research, carried out by and chairedby former 1,500m world record holder Steve Cram, says the sporting legacy left by the Gam es could be in jeopardy unless 250,000 full- and part-time coaching jobs are created.While high-profile sports such as soccer are turning to foreign coaches at both national and club level, Cram believes the lack of homegrown coaches in all sports must be addressed."The report highlights that unless we can break the culture of 'gentleman amateurism' in spo rt, we will struggle to become best in the world," Cram said."As long as we continue to rely on an army of grassroots volunteers, with no clear career progression for homegrown coaches, we will tend to look to superannuated foreign coaches to fill the top jobs in sport."If we don't act now to stem the endemic culture of volunteerism in sport, we may have alrea dy missed the chance for sporting success at London 2012."Senior figures in 12 leading sports were interviewed for the report by the Sportnation think ta nk, which found that nearly 70 percent of sports coaches in are volunteers.It said athletics, the blue-ribbon event of the Olympics, has as few as 12 salaried coaches. Cram said there was to o much reliance on "white, middle-class men who are giving up a bit of time" and it was vital to spread the net more widely. "You need coaches who are from your background and who you identify with, because they are the people who enthuse you and give you a bit of vision and a dream," he told Reuters. "I remember my daughter came back from the athletics club a couple of times and said 'Dad, why are all the coaches old men?'" he added."I said 'well, because they've got the time to do it'." For a 12- or 13-year-old its not a particularly vibrant picture to paint."Poor backgroundCram said coaching had to be made attractive as a career option to entice the sort of people who would otherwise be lost to sp ort."If you are struggling just to make a living and you don't have lots of time and you have all so rts of other pressures in your life, you are not going to look at coaching if there is no chance of it giving you something back," he said.A recent blueprint put forward by Sports Coach , the national coaching foundation, set a targ et of 42,000 new coaching positions by 2016, but the Loughborough research says that figure would be inadequate. It calls for between 160,000 to 2 33,000 paid positions.Failure to do so, the report says, could exclude those from poor backgrounds becoming invol ved in coaching and lead to 's sporting talent going abroad.Portsmouth and England goalkeeper David James, who still hopes to be part of Italian Fabio Capello's plans for the national team, said could struggle to compete in many sports unless the level of investment in coaching was improved."The research shows that unless we act now to professionalize our coaching system from grassroots to elite sport stars, and draw inspirational coaches from all sections of society, British teams will continue to fall short in international competition," he said.Pat Duffy, the chief executive of Sports Coach , believes that fourth place at the London 201 2 Olympics is achievable, but says there is still a long way to go."If we don't put the coaching infrastructure in place we are relying on the odd exceptions ... but things are improving. We had ex cellent results in Sydney and ," he told Reuters recently."We need to make sure the improvements are long-term and sustainable. We are in direct competition with the likes of France, Italy, Australia an d , all of whom have established coaching infrastructure."。
单筐养殖龙虾
Aquacultural Engineering 53 (2013) 14–18Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirectAquaculturalEngineeringj o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w .e l s e v i e r.c o m /l o c a t e /a q u a -o n l i neCommercial land-based farming of European lobster (Homarus gammarus L.)in recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)using a single cage approachAsbjørn Drengstig a ,∗,Asbjørn Bergheim ba Norwegian Lobster Farm AS,Stavanger,NorwaybIRIS –International Research Institute of Stavanger,Stavanger,Norwaya r t i c l ei n f oKeywords:Lobster farming RASManagementa b s t r a c tIn the past,farming of the European lobster in land-based systems has turned out to be difficult.The ideal system for rearing lobsters individually should be relatively inexpensive to construct and operate,simple to maintain,based on automatic feeding and self-cleaning of tank and cages,maintain ideal water quality conditions,use space in three dimensions,enable high densities,conserve water at high temper-atures,ensure good survival and permit easy access to the livestock for inspection and feeding.Several attempts have been made to mass-produce these cannibalistic crustaceans under controlled environ-ments.However,none of the many previous attempts have proved to be successful in incorporating all of these features into a single design.Thus,the development of land-based lobster farming has been severely hampered by lack of suitable technology and production methods.The major constraints have been the need for individual rearing cages to avoid cannibalism,need of heated water,lack of high quality dry food,high labor costs,inadequate technological solutions and high investment costs.Today,Norwegian Lobster Farm operates the world’s first land-based RAS farm producing plate sized lobsters.The company also operates its own brood-stock department and a hatchery for production of IV-stage juveniles.The system contains a patented single cage technology with moving bed biofilters where the recirculation system is designed to fit the water management.Automated solutions for accurate feeding,robots supporting mass-rearing of the IV-stage juveniles and image processing programs for daily monitoring of each single individual have been developed and successfully tested.© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.1.IntroductionToday,European lobster (Homarus gammarus L.)is considered to be the most exclusive seafood product in the world.At present there is a scarce supply of wild caught lobster into the international markets,with quantities varying between 2000and 2500metric tons (MT)per annum (Agnalt,2008).In Norway the annual land-ings have declined from 1000to 1300MT in the early 20th century to 30–50MT from 1980s and onwards.This has led to elevated mar-ket prices due to an increasing gap between supply and demand.Hence,European lobster is a promising candidate for closed-cycle aquaculture.The attention on full grow-out culture peaked in the 1970s,when government funded research programs on intensive culture of American lobster were conducted in USA and Canada (e.g.Coffelt and Wikman-Coffelt,1985).As a result of this research and ear-lier studies,lobster biology is reasonably well understood (Factor,1995),seed stock can be produced on demand,and systems and∗Corresponding author.Tel.:+4790196731;fax:+4751325901.E-mail address:asbjorn.drengstig@ (A.Drengstig).strategies are in place for rearing lobster from larvae to market size (van Olst et al.,1980;Aiken and Waddy,1995;Nicosia and Lavalli,1999).Several private companies in America started lobster production,but none of these projects proved to be commercially viable (Nicosia and Lavalli,1999).A large increase in landings of wild lobsters and an abrupt termination of governmental research programs,before rearing technology and formulated lobster feeds were sufficiently developed,contributed to this scenario (Aiken and Waddy,1995).Besides,the necessary computer and automation technology was too poorly developed by 1995to achieve a sufficient automation level at a reasonable production cost.However,after the millennium there have been some significant breakthroughs in the development of automation and land-based aquaculture tech-nology (Drengstig and Bergheim,2010b ).Especially in the field of recirculation technology,major progress has made land-based aquaculture using heated water more economical realistic.Compared to other lobster species,the Homarus species are con-sidered very hardy with a simple and abbreviated larval period.They feed readily on natural and artificial feeds (Drengstig et al.,2009),are resistant to disease and exhibit a very rapid and accel-erated growth in warmed water (van Olst et al.,1980;Kristiansen et al.,2004).Thus,temperature is the primary controller of growth0144-8609/$–see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved./10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.007A.Drengstig,A.Bergheim/Aquacultural Engineering53 (2013) 14–1815and optimum water temperature has been found to be20◦C(e.g. Aiken and Waddy,1995).Larval period in20◦C water is around12 days(Waddy,1988;Drengstig et al.,2009)compared to35days at 15◦C(van Olst et al.,1980).Furthermore,H.gammarus can reach 250–300g(total length210mm;carapace length75mm)in24–30 months as long as constant20◦C water is provided(Wickins and Beard,1991;Kristiansen et al.,2004).The much higher growth rate at20◦C is primarily a result of the eliminated winter growth inhibition allowing for year-round growth and molting.Because of large growth variation and high losses due to canni-balism and injuries when kept communally,the cultured lobsters have to be kept in individual containers.Thus,the ideal system for rearing lobsters individually should be relatively inexpensive to construct and operate,simple to maintain,based on automatic feeding and self-cleaning of tank and cages,maintain ideal water quality conditions,use space in three dimensions,enable high den-sities,conserve water at high temperatures,ensure good survival and permit easy access to the livestock for inspection and feed-ing(Aiken and Waddy,1995).Aiken and Waddy(1995)reported that no successful attempts had been made which incorporated all of these features into a single design.Several different meth-ods have been developed for culturing lobsters individually.All of them attempt to provide a separate compartment for each lobster, a constant supply of oxygen saturated seawater to each individ-ual,a method of providing food and removing solids and dissolved wastes,and in general create an environment that will promote rapid,uniform growth and high survival(van Olst et al.,1980; Grimsen et al.,1987).Bottlenecks for commercial culture of lob-sters have also been lack of high quality dry feed and technology that can solve the problems related to rearing in individual con-tainers in an effective and profitable way(Drengstig and Bergheim, 2010b).Successful industrialization of land-based RAS farming has been warranted by overcoming the many technical challenges related to adopting the highly cannibalistic European lobster to high-tech profitable production technologies while still providing optimum rearing conditions.A major R&D project was conducted on the island Kvitsøy in SW Norway by Norwegian Lobster Farm Ltd. during2000–2007.As a result,the company is today the only producer of European lobster in the world.The production util-izes a profitable land-based technology based on re-circulation of seawater and a world-wide patented single cage technology.The R&D program included testing of6different technical solutions, developing a formulated diet fulfilling nutritional requirements, developing various automated solutions(feeding robot,harvest-ing robot,selection robot,remote desktop solutions,and image processing program),developing biological protocols,and conduct-ing culinary tests and market studies.As a result,Norwegian Lobster Farm has managed to close the production cycle from egg to plate-size solely based on a formulated diet,demonstrating commercial harvests and market success both in terms of product quality and high farm gate prices.This paper presents the system design for the technology developed by Norwegian Lobster Farm and the how the system performed under commercial conditions.The biological data have been collected from a number of individual tests over the last10years.2.System designThe construction consisted of a hatchery,a brood-stock section and an on-growing tank with an annual production capacity of2MT plate-sized lobsters(Fig.1A).The farm was equipped with sea water pumps,mechanical waterfiltration units,UVfilters,recirculation systems with biofilters,titanium heat exchangers,heaters,header tanks,rearing tanks,larval incubators and accessories.Moreover,the buildings were insulated to prevent heat loss.The total water volume of the hatchery was30m3and the on-growing tank con-tains about150m3.Back-up water was taken from a depth of52m below sea level.Three recirculation loops supplied300L/min offiltered(mesh size:30m)and aerated seawater of18–20◦C.To each loop, 15L/min offiltered and UV treated seawater was supplied the pump sump.The main units for water treatment were biofilter(aera-tion/flushing),screeningfilter and header tank for water chemistry stabilization.Thefluidized bed bio-filters were heavily aerated by air ejectors driven by the recirculation pumps.The size of the biofil-ters was0.5m3filled with AnoxKaldnes TM biofilter media from KrügerKaldnes Ltd.up to60%of the total volume of the biofilter.The filter media had an area–volume ratio of500m2/m3.UV-treated seawater was added corresponding to approximately one com-plete renewal of seawater in each loop every third day.The water exchange rate was temporarily been higher than this,especially in the early stages of testing out the RAS technology.The hatchery had an average production capacity of350,000 IV stage juveniles annually using24upstream Kreisl incubators (40L).The density during the pelagic stage(I–IV stage)was approx-imately2500juveniles per incubator.A selection robot was used to determine when the larvae reached IV-stage.In this process,an image of each larvae in the incubator was captured,analyzed and its features were extracted andfinally classified.The result of the final classification gave one of two possibilities;either the juve-nile had reached IV-stage or not.The capacity was approximately 20juveniles per minute.Juveniles between I and III stages were automatically transported back to their siblings in the incubator, while IV-stage juveniles were transported to a new robot in charge of distributing one lobster into one cage for on-growing.In the on-growing facility,the single cages(Fig.1B)rotated similar to conventional conveyer belts,and the lobsters were fed when the cages were in an up-right vertical position.The cam-eras werefixed under the feeding robots,enabling the system to monitor each single individual every day by taking pictures inside the cages before feeding.Image processing programs then deter-mined whether the lobsters were dead or alive,and if molting had occurred.The image processing program also extrapolated the expected time to harvest by calculating molting frequency. After feeding,the cages rotated in right hand direction,and new cages came into vertical up-right position.Lobsters inhabiting the cages on the way down started eating their daily meals.When the cages came in vertical down-wards position,uneaten feed and fecal waste fell out of the cages.A wiper with suction rotated vertically on the bottom,efficiently cleaning the tankfloor.Self-cleaning of cages was facilitated by inlet currentflow being placed within each single-cage unit,while outlet currentflow was positioned between the units.Thus,new water was supplied every single cage in addi-tion to providing a slightly overhead pressure pushing the waste out of the cages facing down toward the bottom.A principal sketch of the patented technology is presented in Fig.1B andC shows the technology in operation.The stocking densities varied according to individual size,with maximum biomass of25kg/m3for6cm lobster,35kg/m3for12cm and approximately45kg/m3for portion sized lobsters,respec-tively.3.System performance3.1.Growth and feed utilizationIn order to determine growth rates of lobsters,both carapace length(CL)and total length(TL)were measured during the initial trials at Kvitsøy.However,calculations showed a consistent ratio16 A.Drengstig,A.Bergheim /Aquacultural Engineering 53 (2013) 14–18Fig.1.RAS facilities at Norwegian Lobster Farm (NLF),Kvitsøy.(A)Flow diagram and design of the hatchery,broodstock and grow-out sections with water treatment units.(B)Principle sketch of the single cage technology.(C)Fully automated production unit and tank system including (A)single cages,(B)feeding robot,(C)cameras and image processing solutions,(D)control units and (E)machine room in center below deck.between CL and TL with a correlation of 0.97and,thus,only CL was measured in the present study (Kristiansen et al.,2004).The time needed to produce a 300g lobster (approximately 75mm CL)is dependent on growth rate.In the RAS setup at Norwegian Lob-ster Farm,portion sized lobsters are produced from hatching to 300g within 800–900days or approximately 17,000day-degrees at favorable conditions (Drengstig et al.,2009).In Fig.2linear growth lines have been extrapolated based on obtained growth results Kvitsøy (Kristiansen et al.,2004).The growth of the lobsters pro-duced in this RAS system equals the best growth rates published from other studies (e.g.Wickins and Beard,1991;Aiken and Waddy,1995).As already demonstrated in several individual trials,it is not unrealistic that plate-sized lobsters can be mass-produced from IV stage to 300g in less than 24months under intensive production levels (Kristiansen et al.,2004;Drengstig et al.,2009).A prerequisite to obtain such production time is however using an optimum diet and feeding regime,and keeping a stable environment in the sys-tem.Moreover,by using the new formulated lobster feed (Table 1),all individuals maintained a natural black color.On the other hand,lobsters fed traditional marine fish feed available on the market turned pale blue to white after 2–3molts.Three different astaxan-thin levels were tested (50,100and 200mg/kg dry weight),but no variation in pigmentation was observed between the three levelsA.Drengstig,A.Bergheim /Aquacultural Engineering 53 (2013) 14–1817Table 1Chemical composition and nutritional content of the feed.Nutrient content%of wet weightProtein 54.7Lipid15.6Carbohydrates 13.6Ash9.5Moisture6.8Crude energy (MJ/kg)21.6Astaxanthin level was 50,100and 200mg/kg dry weight.(Drengstig et al.,2003).The average feed conversion ratio (FCR)was approximately 1.5under commercial scaled production,whereas FCR were 1.2–1.3under small scale controlled trials.In addition,selection of family groups with fast growth under intensive farming conditions could further reduce the production time.Several studies have been performed at Kvitsøy in order to promote year-round hatching and reveal correlations between the quality of the female lobster and the egg quality in terms of growth and survival rate (Agnalt,2008;Drengstig et al.,2011).3.2.Water qualityA system that supplies water of good quality is an essential factor if we want to obtain good welfare and growth,and reduce stress and risk of disease outbreaks.Especially in closed recirculation systems,where there is little or no exchange of water,a build-up of toxic metabolites and reduction in oxygen concentrations may happen very rapidly (Timmons and Losordo,1994).However,in land-based profitable lobster farming,re-circulation of water is necessary to reduce heating costs.Thus,in any occasion,it is important to under-stand what the optimal as well as limiting culture conditions are for lobsters.Oxygen supersaturated water has on the other hand been shown to cause serious damage as gas bubbles can develop in the hemolymph and restrict blood flow (Aiken and Waddy,1995).Fur-thermore,while lobster may tolerate wide fluctuations in salinity,optimal conditions range between 28and 35‰(van Olst et al.,1980;Richards,1981;D’Abramo and Conklin,1985).Whilst Beard et al.(1985),Beard and McGregor (2004),and Jacklin and Combes (2007)were unable to provide recommended limits for nitrite and nitrate,ammonia concentration is most likely the most limiting water qual-ity parameter in recirculation systems for seawater.Although the optimal TAN concentration given by van Olst et al.(1980)is slightly higher than that recommended by D’Abramo andConklin (1985)of less than 1.5mg/L,there is no doubt that Homarus sp.are more010********6070090180270360450 540 630 720 810 900 990 1080Days from Stage IVC L (m m )0.10 mm/day 0.09 mm/day 0.08 mm/day 0.07 mm/day goal Kvitsøy small Kvitsøy largeFig.2.Four estimated growth rates of European lobster from size stage IV until plate-size (75mm CL).Squared and circular marks indicate measured growth at NLF.Fig.3.Mean oxygen consumption of European lobster (individual size:0.06–208g)at 19.5–20.3◦C (Report IRIS,unpublished).Unit:mg O 2/kg min.tolerant than most finfish.Estrella (2002)indicated that short-term acceptable levels of nitrite and nitrate might be as high as 5mg/L and 100mg/L,respectively.According to Wickins and Lee (2002),the desirable levels of water quality for clawed lobsters are tem-perature of 18–22◦C,salinity of 28–35‰,above 6.4mg oxygen/L,pH of 7.8–8.2and less than 14g N/L as un-ionized ammonia.Thus,it seems like European lobster can,for short periods,tolerate con-siderably lower oxygen and higher ammonia concentrations than indicated as desirable levels.Available literature of metabolic rate in European lobster is sparse but Hamelo (2006)performed some studies at Kvitsøy and measured strongly fluctuating oxygen consumption in lobster of different size at 19◦C:Small/fry 7–10g 0.8–6.3mg O 2/kg min Medium-size 43–54g 0.5–3.5mg O 2/kg min Large148–208g0.7–2.1mg O 2/kg minThe large individual variability in oxygen consumption at various sizes also demonstrates rapid adaptability to new con-ditions.Typical stress influenced respiration rate seems to be approximately twice the standard rate.The standard rate of Euro-pean lobster within the size interval 230–600g was found to be 0.73mg O 2/kg min at 20◦C (Whiteley et al.,1990),i.e.about half of the lowest rate found for lobster of 208g farmed at Kvitsøy.The oxygen consumption ranges were large,1:8–1:3within the same size groups,and the fluctuations were due to diur-nal rhythm and peaked at feeding (Hamelo,2006).The measured CO 2-production was on average 1.5–2times the corresponding O 2-consumption.A smaller follow-up study was conducted at the International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS)in 2010(Fig.3).Some of the animals were obviously temporarily stressed,and peak rates were always measured during the first monitoring.In addition,several of the adults,i.e.the individuals of 93.9g,122g and the largest one of 208g,seemed to suffer from stress in the respirometer,probably due to the small size of the chamber.Excretion rates were also measured during the respirometer study performed by IRIS in 2010.The ammonia analyses indicate,as expected,a higher specific excretion rate in terms of mg TAN/kg min in fry compared to in larger animals:Small/fry0.5–1.8g 0.35mg TAN/kg min Medium sized 20–44g 0.07–0.1mg TAN/kg min Large94–208g0.04–0.09mg TAN/kg minHowever,replicate sampling of the same size groups demon-strated considerable fluctuation from one test situation to another.Increased excretion rate in the largest animals (122–208g)was positively correlated with increased oxygen consumption in the18 A.Drengstig,A.Bergheim/Aquacultural Engineering53 (2013) 14–18Table2Water quality at four sampling points at low loading level in the grow-out unit,NLF,November2004.Sampling point Temp.(◦C)pH Salinity(‰)DO(mg/L(%))S-DM(mg/L)TOC(mg/L)TAN(g/L)NH3-N a,g/L NO3-N(g/L)Flow(L/h)Make-up water10.08.3033.78.3(92)–––––90 Outlet lobster tank18.28.1533.6 6.2(82)<5 2.26453218806000 Outlet biofilter18.48.3233.5 6.4(89) 5.3 3.229<51860Outlet drumfilter18.48.3233.6 6.4(89) 6.4––––a Calculated(Alabaster and Lloyd,1982).same individuals.Beard et al.(1985)estimated excretion rates inadults(H.gammarus L.of300g)of0.10–0.37mg TAN/kg min or upto3–4times the rates found in the present test(size:208g).At Kvitsøy,the biofilter is efficiently removing total ammonia(TAN)at average rates of50–70%of the before–after biofilter con-centration.Concentration of un-ionized ammonia(NH3)as per centof total ammonia nitrogen(TAN)was calculated according to thefollowing equation:%NH3=1001+antilog(p K awhere the dissociation constant,p K a,ranges from9.09to9.90 dependent on temperature and salinity(Alabaster and Lloyd,1982).Lobster feed is high in protein and the ammonia excretion rates in the animals are correspondingly high with average rates of 0.1–0.5g TAN/kg day reported for adult lobster.Due to the high pro-tein content of the feed and the reported low tolerance to ammonia (Wickins and Lee,2002),the efficiency of the biofilter is vital in RAS for lobsters(e.g.Crear and Forteath,2002).At low loading level in the grow-out pilot,all measured param-eters were within or slightly outside the desirable range for lobster(Table2).The concentration of unionized ammonia(NH3) of32g/L was lower compared to sampling before and after the actual date.Besides,the embedded biofilters seemed to work rather well,stable and problem free at a loading level of0.1kg/m3per24h (Drengstig and Bergheim,2010a).Ongoing extended water sampling of the present system with higher biomass and correspondingly increased loading level will provide more basic criteria for optimizing the management of RAS for commercial production of European lobster.4.ConclusionCurrently there is still a lack of knowledge on respiration and excretion rates of lobster at all stages,and documentation of opti-mum rearing conditions in RAS.Based on the economic importance of these issues,priority should be given to detecting critical water quality values for dimensioning of technical equipment in order to sustain a healthy environment for the biomass.Moreover,it is important for successful commercialization to improve growth performance,survival and feed conversion ratio(FCR)in RAS in order to increase the turn-over in the biomass.Feed development and genetic breeding is of course essential factors for improved growth rates in land-based lobster aquaculture.ReferencesAgnalt,A.-L.,2008.Stock enhancement of European lobster(Homarus gammarus) in Norway;comparisons of reproduction,growth and movement between wild and cultured lobster.Dr.Scient.Thesis.Department of Biology,University of Bergen,Norway.Alabaster,J.S.,Lloyd,R.,1982.Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Fish,2nd ed.FAO,Butterwords,London,p.361.Aiken,D.E.,Waddy,S.L.,1995.Aquaculture.In:Factor,J.R.(Ed.),Biology of the Lobster Homarus americanus.Academic Press,Inc.,San Diego,pp.153–175.Beard,T.W.,McGregor,D.,2004.Storage and Care of Live boratory Leaflet Number66(revised).CEFAS,UK.Beard,T.W.,Richards,P.R.,Wickins J.F.,1985.The techniques and practicability of year-round production of lobsters,Homarus gammarus(L.),in laboratory recir-culation systems.Fisheries Research Technical Report No.79.Lowestoft,UK,p.22.ISSN0308-5589.Crear, B.J.,Forteath,G.N.R.,2002.Feeding rate has the largest effect on the ammonia excretion rate of the southern rock lobster,Jasus edwardslii,and the western rock lobster,Panulirus cygnus.Aquacultural Engineering26, 239–250.Coffelt,R.J.,Wikman-Coffelt,J.,1985.Lobsters:one million one pounders per year.Aquacultural Engineering4,51–58.D’Abramo,L.R.,Conklin,D.E.,1985.Lobster aquaculture.In:Huner,J.,Brown,E.E.(Eds.),Crustacean and Mollusc Aquaculture in the USA.AVI Publ.Co.,Westport, CT,USA,pp.159–201.Drengstig,A.,Kristiansen T.S.,Bergheim A.,Drengstig T.,Aardal L.,2003.It does matter if they are black or white!Quantification of the minimum required level of astaxanthine to ensure natural pigmentation in the European lobster,pp.168–169(Extended abstract and Poster presentation)EAS Special Publication No.33,August2003,Trondheim,Norway,408p.Drengstig,A.,Drengstig,T.,Agnalt,A.-L.,Jørstad,K.,Farestveit,E.,2009.Utvikling av metoder for stabil produksjon av hummeryngel med gode vekstegenskaper,42 pp.http://www.rup.no/vision/vision7.aspx?hierarchyid=763&type=3(in Nor-wegian).Drengstig,A.,Bergheim,A.,2010a.Single cage technology for on-growing of lob-ster in RAS.In:Abstract and Oral Presentation Progress in Marine Recirculating Aquaculture Systems–World Aquaculture Society,AES Fifth Issues Forum,San Diego,CA,USA,1–5March2010.Drengstig,A.,Bergheim,A.,2010b.A pilot RAS for commercial production of Euro-pean lobster.In:Aquacultural Engineering Society Proceedings VII,Roanoke, Virginia,USA,16–20August2010,pp.178–186.Drengstig,A.,Agnalt,A.-L.,Jørstad,K.,2011.Genetic mapping to improve growth performance,survival and feed conversion ratio(FCR)for on-growing of Euro-pean lobster in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems(RAS).In:Proceeding9th International Conference and Workshop on Lobster Biology and Management, Bergen,Norway,19–23June2011.Estrella,B.T.,2002.Techniques for live storage and shipping of American lobster.Technical Report TR-8,18.Division of Marine Fisheries,MA.Factor,J.R.,1995.Biology of the Lobster Homarus americanus.Academic Press,Inc., New York,p.528.Grimsen,S.,Jaques,R.N.,Erenst,V.,Balchen,J.G.,1987.Aspects of automation in a lobster farming plant.Modelling,Identification and Control8(1),61–68. Hamelo,J.S.,2006.Investigation of respiration rates of European lobster(Homarus gammarus)in land-based,lobster farming system.Master Thesis.Univ.of Sta-vanger,Norway,86p.Jacklin,M.,Combes,J.,2007.The Good Practice Guide to Handling and Storing Live Crustacea.http://www.seafi/media/Publications/CrustaceaGPG0505.pdf Kristiansen,T.S.,Drengstig,A.,Bergheim,A.,Drengstig,T.,Svensen,R.,Kollsgård,I.,Nøstvoll,E.,Farestveit,E.,Aardal,L.,2004.Development of intensive farm-ing methods for the European lobster(Homarus gammarus L.)in recirculated seawater.Results from experiments conducted at Kvitsøy Lobster Hatchery from2000to2004.Fisken og Havet,6–2004,Institute of Marine Research, Bergen,p.52ISSN0071-5638http://www.imr.no/data/page/3839/Nr.6 2004Methods for intensive farming of European lobster.pdfNicosia,F.,Lavalli,K.,1999.Homarid lobster hatcheries:their history and role in research,management,and aquaculture.Marine Fisheries Review61(2),1–57. Richards,P.R.,1981.Some aspects of growth and behaviour in the juvenile lobster Homarus gammarus(Linnaeus).Ph.D.Thesis.University of Wales,Bangor,Great Britain,209p.Timmons,M.B.,Losordo,J.G.,1994.Aquaculture Water Reuse Systems:Engineering Design and Management.Elsevier,New York,USA.van Olst,J.C.,Carlberg,J.M.,Hughes,J.T.,1980.Aqauculture.In:Cobbs,J.S.,Phillips,B.F.(Eds.),The biology and management of lobsters,vol.II Ecology and manage-ment.Academic Press,Inc,New York,pp.333–384.Waddy,S.L.,1988.Farming the homarid lobsters:state of the art.World Aquaculture 19(4),61–71.Whiteley,N.M.,Al-Wassia,A.H.,Taulor,E.W.,1990.The effect of temperature,aerial exposure and disturbance on oxygen consumption in the lobster,Homarus gam-marus(L.).Marine Behaviour and Physiology17,213–222.Wickins,J.F.,Beard,T.W.,1991.Variability in size at moult among individual broods of cultured juvenile lobsters.Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 22,481–489.Wickins,J.F.,Lee,D.O.,2002.Crustacean Farming–Ranching and Culture.Blackwell Science,United Kingdom,p.446.。
2012考研英语真题
2012研究生考试英语一Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text。
Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A,B,C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1。
(10 points)Read the following text。
Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A,B,C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)The ethical judgments of the Supreme Court justices have become an important issue recently. The court cannot _1_ its legitimacy as guardian of the rule of law _2_ justices behave like politicians. Yet, in several instances,justices acted in ways that _3_ the court’s reputation for being independent and impartial。
Justice Antonin Scalia,for example, appeared at political events. That kind of activity makes it less likely that the court’s decisions will be _4_ as impartial judgments. Part of the problem is that the justices are not _5_by an ethics code。
2012年6月英语六级阅读理解备考:真题长难句(14)
66.This group will still include middle-income seniors on Medicare, who’ll have to dig deeply into their pockets before getting much from the new drug benefit that starts in 2006. (2006年6⽉)【分析】本句为复合句。
句⼦主⼲为This group will still include…。
who引导定语从句,先⾏词为middle-income seniors on Medicare;第⼆个定语从句是that starts in 2006,其先⾏词是the new drug benefit。
【译⽂】这个群体也包括那些中等收⼊的依赖美国医疗保障制度的⽼年⼈,在从2006年实施的新药品福利中受益之前,他们也不得不⼤⼤⽀出⼀笔费⽤。
67.When Jonathan Freedman, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto, reviewed the literature, he found only 200 or so studies of television-watching and aggression.(2006年6⽉)【分析】本句为复合句。
主句为he found only 200 or so studies of television-watching and aggression。
a social psychologist at the University of Toronto是Jonathan Freedman的同位语。
when引导时间状语从句。
【译⽂】加拿⼤多伦多⼤学的社会⼼理学教授乔纳森•弗⾥德曼仔细审阅了这些⽂献资料后发现,只有⼤约200份研究涉及看电视与攻击⾏为。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Nutrition and Cancer,64(1),34–40Copyright C⃝2012,Taylor&Francis Group,LLC ISSN:0163-5581print/1532-7914online DOI:10.1080/01635581.2012.630164Association Between Low Colonic Short-Chain Fatty Acids and High Bile Acids in High Colon Cancer Risk Populations Junhai OuDepartment of Gastroenterology,Hepatology and Nutrition,School of Medicine,Universityof Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USAJames P.DeLanyDepartment of Medicine,Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism,Universityof Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USAMing ZhangDepartment of Clinical Nutrition,Weifang People’s Hospital,Weifang,Shandong,ChinaSumit SharmaDepartment of Medicine,University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USAStephen J.D.O’KeefeDepartment of Gastroenterology,Hepatology and Nutrition,School of Medicine,Universityof Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USAWe propose that the influence of diet on colon cancer risk is mediated by the microbiota.To investigate how dietary fat influ-ences risk,we compared the colonic contents of12adult high-risk African Americans(AAs)and10Caucasian Americans(CAs)who consumed a high-fat diet(123±11g/d and129±17g/d,respec-tively)to13native Africans(NAs)who subsisted on a low-fat(38±3.0g/d)diet,all aged50–60yr.The colonic bile acids were measured by LC-MS and the short-chain fatty acids(SCFAs)by GC.The chief secondary colonic bile acids,deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid,were correlated with fat intake and similar between AAs and CAs,but3–4times higher than in AAs(p<0.05).The major SCFAs were lower in AAs(p<0.001)and CAs(p<0.001)compared to AAs,but conversely,the branched chain fatty acids(BFCA)were higher.Our results suggest that the higher risk of colon cancer in Americans may be partly explained by their high-fat and high-protein,low complex carbohydrate diet,which produces colonic residues that promote microbes to produce potentially carcino-genic secondary bile acids and less antineoplastic SCFAs.The role of BCFA in colonic carcinogenesis deserves further study.Submitted5August2010;accepted infinal form11June2011.Address correspondence to Stephen J.D.O’Keefe MD,M.Sc., Department of Gastroenterology,University of Pittsburgh,570Scaife Hall,3550Terrace St.,Pittsburgh,PA15213.Phone:412-648-7217. E-mail:sjokeefe@INTRODUCTIONColon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in Americans,and African Americans are at the highest risk of developing and dying from colon cancer(1).Based on Novem-ber2005SEER data submission((/csr/ 19752003/),the age-adjusted incidence rate,based on cases di-agnosed from17geographic areas,was61.4vs.72.9per100,000 for White and Black males and44.7vs.56.1per100,000for White and Black females,respectively.Interestingly,Africans living in Africa rarely get this disease(1,2).The observation that colon cancer is more common in developed than in developing nations suggests that the Westernized way of life,and in partic-ular the diet,may be responsible for the increased risk of the disease(3).We have,on the basis of our dietary investigations, suggested that it is the relatively high animal product and low complex carbohydrate intakes of Americans that places them at higher risk(2).Although some dietary constituents may be directly carcino-genic,we have proposed that the diet mainly affects colonic mucosal health and cancer risk by its influence on the micro-biota to produce health-promoting or toxic metabolites(4).Thus Africans are protected by their high dietary intakes of complex carbohydrate,such as resistant starch,which increase the pro-duction of short-chain fatty acids(SCFAs)chiefly by Firmicutes of Clostridia cluster XIVa and IV(5).There is substantial ev-idence that SCFAs are also antiproliferative and antineoplastic 34BILE ACIDS,SHORT-CHAIN FATTY ACIDS,AND COLON CANCER RISK35(6),and one of them,butyrate,is the preferred energy source for colonocytes.On the other hand,a high meat diet stimu-lates the sulfate-reducing bacteria to produce hydrogen sulfide, which,experimentally,has been shown to be genotoxic(7).Fur-thermore,a high meat diet is usually accompanied by a high fat intake,which stimulates the synthesis and secretion of bile acids by the liver into the intestine.A proportion of these escape the enterohepatic circulation and enter the colon,where they stim-ulate7α-dehydroxylating bacteria to produce secondary bile salts,which again have been shown to be carcinogenic in exper-imental models(8).In support for our hypothesis,we have shown that fecal and colonic SCFAs are indeed higher in low-risk native Africans than high-risk Americans(9).We have also shown that7α-dehydroxylating bacteria counts are higher in African Ameri-cans(2).Here we investigate thefinal link in the chain,fecal and colonic secondary bile acid contents between these2popula-tions.In addition,we simultaneously investigate the relationship cancer risk has with the minor SCFA,including the branched chain fatty acids that are more influenced by dietary protein than carbohydrate.METHODSMaterialsAll bile acid and SCFA chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich(St.Louis,MO).Econo-Cap EC-1000GC cap-illary Column was purchased from Grace Davison Discovery Science(Deerfield,IL).Millex-GS0.22µm syringefilters and microconcentrators were purchased from Millipore(Bedford, MA),Luna C18column(3µm,2.0mm I.D.×150mm; Phenomenex,Torrance,CA).Study PopulationHealthy male and female American volunteers,aged50–60yr,were selected because the risk of cancer increases appre-ciably after age50.Subjects with a history of gastrointestinal disease,surgery,or antibiotic use during the previous8wk were excluded because this might influence colonic bacterial metabolism.For recruiting Caucasian and African American subjects who were from the Pittsburgh area,the protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Pittsburgh.For recruiting native Africans from ur-ban Pretoria and the rural regions of Gauteng,South Africa,the protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical University of Southern Africa Medical Ethics and Safety Committee. Study ProceduresThe study design,history taking,and methods have been previously described(2).Informed consent was obtained from volunteers,and then dietary histories were taken by3-day recall and analyzed by local software programs.American subjects were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center for a 2-day stay.In the African study,participants were admitted to GaRankua Hospital,Gauteng(urban),or Tintswalo Hospital in Limpopo Province(rural)of South Africa.Subjects were studied in the morning following an overnight fast.A rapid colon evacuation was performed by the consumption of2L of GoLytely preparation(principal ingredient polyethylene glycol 3500)within30min.All stool passed over the next3h was then collected and weighed in a plastic container.A10-g sample of thefirst(solid stool)bowel movement was separated from the collection as the fecal sample and immediately frozen at −20◦C.The3-h colonic evacuate was weighed and emulsified by shaking.Fifty-gram samples were then extracted and frozen at−20◦C until analysis.Bile Acid AssayThe bile acid concentrations in feces and quantities in colonic evacuates were measured based on the method described by Tagliacozzi et al.(11)except that quantitation was carried out using LC-MS as opposed to LC-tandem MS.A125-µl colonic evacuate was mixed with400µl of acetonitrile,followed by 1-min vortex-mixing.After15-min centrifugation at13,000g, 450µl of the supernatant were transferred to an autosampler vial and blown to dryness with nitrogen.The residue was dissolved with125µl of methanol and water(1:1).Tenµl of this solu-tion were injected into Shimadzu HPLC-MS(2010A;Columbia, MD)for quantitation using electrospray ionization in negative ion mode using selective ion monitoring of the appropriate(M-H)−ion.The analytical conditions for LC-MS were as follows: Column Luna3u,C18,100A(2.0mm I.D.×150mm;Phe-nomenex,Torrance,CA)—Mobile phase A:20%Acetonitrile-water containing10-mM ammonium acetate;Mobile phase B: 80%Acetonitrile-water;gradient program—Mobile phase B: 0–6min15%;20min30%;30min60%;40min80%;45min 15%,flow rate:0.2ml/min;column temperature:40◦C;Probe voltage:4.5kv;CDL temperature230◦C.The bile acids were calculated based on standard curves run with each sample set. Fig.1is a typical selective ion monitoring chromatogram of the bile acids for an African American(AA)and native African (NA)participant.SCFA AssayEvacuate samples(0.2ml)and fecal samples(0.1g) were transferred into plastic tubes,with the addition of2,2-dimethylbutyric acid at1mM as internal standard.After mixing on a vortex and centrifugation(1,900g,10min),the super-natant wasfiltered through a Millex-GS0.22µm syringefilter unit(Millipore,Bedford,MA)to remove bacterial cells.Another filtration was then done through a microconcentrator(Ultracel YM-10,Millipore,Bedford,MA)with a molecular mass cutoff of10000Dalton,by centrifugation(7,000×g at4◦C for1.5 h).Thefiltrate was then analyzed using an Agilent Technolo-gies6890N Network GC System with aflame-ionization de-tector for SCFAs based on the method described by Scheppach et al.(12).Compounds were separated on a Grace EC-1000, 15-m length,1.20-µmfilm thickness,0.53mm ID capillary36J.OU ET AL.20406080100120140160180200LCA(x10)CADCAM a j o r B i l e A c i d C o n t e n t s (u m o l e /t o t a l e v a c u a t e s )CAs FIG.1.Major bile acid contents in evacuates were significantly lower in Native Africans (NAs)compared to African Americans (AAs)and Caucasian Americans (CAs).∗P <0.05vs.NAs,Mann-Whitney testing.There was no difference between AAs and CAs.LCA data has been magnified 10times in order to be visible on this scale.Bile acid abbreviations:LCA,lithocholic acid;CA,cholic acid;DCA,deoxycholic acid.column (Grace Davison Discovery Science,Deerfield,IL).The GC oven temperature was programmed at 5◦min-1from 80to 175◦C,which was held for 10min and had a total running time of 25min.The temperatures of both detector and injector were 200◦C.The inlet was operated in splitless mode.High purity helium was used as carrier gas.A mixed SCFA standard solution was prepared using high purity (>99%)reagents (Sigma,St.Louis,MO).SCFA values were computed using peak area ratio of the analyte to the internal standard.There was a good linear correlation between the peak area ratio and the corresponding standard SCFA with r values of >0.99for all SCFAs.The interday and intraday coefficients of variation were in the range of 2.4%to 3.9%.This method cannot separate the 2-methylbutyric and isovaleric acid.The detection limits for the minor SCFA,isobutyric acid,2-methylbutyric-isovaleric acid,valeric acid,hexanoic acid,and 2-methylvaleric acid were 0.05,0.05,0.05,0.1,and 0.1µM,respectively.Sample Size and Statistical AnalysisEarlier studies (13)had shown that the expected differences in the parameters measured between Westernized and Africanpopulations were expected to be large,justifying the small num-bers of subjects included in each group.Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 5.0.1(SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL).The significance of group differences was assessed using non-paramatric Mann-Whitney test.A level of P ≤0.05was accepted as statistically significant.Data are presented as means ±SE.RESULTSColonic fluid concentrations of lithocholic acid,deoxycholic acid,and cholic acid were all significantly higher in AAs than NAs [6.04±1.48vs.1.83±0.74(P =0.018),37.51±34.25,vs.7.30±5.29(P =0.004),and 60.42±10.63vs.16.83±5.71(P =0.01),nmol/g wet weight stool,respectively].There were no significant differences between AAs and Caucasian Ameri-can (CAs),although the group mean values were higher in AAs.Fig.1and Table 1show the calculations of the total colonic bile acids,corrected for evacuant mass (AAs =1.59±0.15,CAs =1.44±0.13,NAs =1.32±0.15kg).Primary bile acids (cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids),secondary (deoxycholic and litho-cholic acids),tertiary (ursodeoxycholic acid),and conjugatedBILE ACIDS,SHORT-CHAIN FATTY ACIDS,AND COLON CANCER RISK37TABLE1The other bile acid contents in evacuates(µmole/total evacuates)Acid African Americans(n=12)Caucasian Americans(n=10)Native Africans(n=13) GCA2.06(1.14)∗0.45(0.11)∗0.12(0.01)TCA9.25(7.41)∗∗0.14(0.05)∗∗0.004(0.003) UDCA7.79(1.91)∗∗21.43(10.97)∗2.56(1.05) GCDCA6.12(5.60)0.17(0.16)0.03(0.03) TCDCA4.95(4.41)∗∗0.01(0.01)0.03(0.03) GDCA5.31(2.88)∗∗0.50(0.12)∗∗0.13(0.04) TDCA5.62(4.60)∗∗0.19(0.06)∗∗0.02(0.01) CDCA60.66(22.01)∗∗14.43(6.66)5.20(4.34) Results are expressed as group mean value followed by standard error in brackets.∗P<0.05.∗∗P<0.01vs.NAs,P<0.05vs.Cau-casian Americans,Mann Whitney testing.GCA indicates glycocholic acid;TCA,taurocholic acid;UDCA,ursodeoxycholic acid;GCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholic acid;TCDCA,taurochenodeoxycholic acid;GDCA,glycodeoxycholic acid;TDCA,taurodeocycholic acid;CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid.(glycocholic,taurocholic,taurochenodeoxycholic,glycodeoxy-cholic,and taurodeoxycholic acids,with the exception of gly-cochenodeoxycholic)were all significantly higher(P<0.01)in AAs compared to NAs.Most bile acids except glycochen-odeoxycholic,taurochenodeoxycholic,and chenodeoxycholicacids were also significantly higher in CAs compared to NAs(P<0.05).Mean bile acid levels were higher in AAs com-pared to CAs,but there was considerable variation,and onlythe difference in glycodeoxycholic acid achieved significance(Table1).Dietary fat intake was significantly higher in bothAmerican groups(AAs:123±11g/d,P<0.0001;CAs:129±17g/d,P<0.0001)compared to native Africans(38±3g/d),as was total protein(AAs:99±10g/d,P=0.002;CAs: 115±11g/d,P=0.0001;NAs58±4g/d)and animal protein intake(AAs:67±9g/d,P<0.0003;CAs:88±9g/d,P< 0.0001;NAs28±2g/d).Dietary fat and animal protein intakes were not significantly different between the2American popu-lations.A weak,but significant,correlation was found between total dietary fat intake and total colonic bile acid content(Fig.2: Y=5.207+0.784∗X;R2=0.207;P=0.01).In contrast,SCFA content in evacuates was significantly higher in NAs compared to AAs or CAs,with the notable excep-tion of the branched chain SCFA,2-methylvaleric acid,which was significantly(P<0.05)higher in both American subgroups (Fig.3and Table2).In order to determine whether SCFA concentrations in fecal samples reflect the total colonic SCFA content,we compared the concentrations measured in thefirst(solid)stool passed to the total quantity of SCFAs measured in the colonic evacuates (Fig.3).The same pattern of difference between Africans and Americans was found,but the significances of the differences were,if anything,greater when comparing fecal samples.NAs also had the highest level of valeric acid and the lowest level of 2-methylvaleric acid among the three groups(P<0.05)(data not shown).-5050100150200250300350400sum2BAs255075100125150175200225250fatY = 3.984 + .761 * X; R^2 = .207FIG.2.Correlation between dietary fat intake calculated from3-day recall and total colonic bile acids in all3population groups showing a weak but significant association(P=0.01).DISCUSSIONThe results of the present study provide a further link in our evidence to support the suggestion that the higher risk of colon cancer in both African and Caucasian Americans than in native Africans may be explained by the interaction between the diet and the human microbiota(2).We show that the colonic content of experimentally carcinogenic secondary bile acids(lithocholic and deoxycholic acids)was,indeed,higher in high colon can-cer risk AAs and CAs compared to low-risk NAs.Our earlier findings showed that dietary fat intake by the American popula-tions was nearly3times higher than in NAs,and that the size of the colonic bacterial populations that contain the enzyme that converts nontoxic primary to these toxic secondary bile acids (e.g.,7-αdehydroxylating Clostridia)was higher in high-risk38J.OU ET AL.0.0050.00100.00150.00200.00250.00Acetic AcidP ropionic acidButyric acidµm o l e /g f e c e s5101520253035404550Acetic AcidP ropionic acidButyric acidFIG.3.Major short-chain fatty acid concentrations in stools (left)and in colonic evacuates [right,previously reported in O’Keefe et al.(9)]were significantly higher in Native Africans (NA)compared to African Americans (AA)and Caucasian Americans (CA).∗∗P <0.001vs.CA and AA;∗P <0.05vs.CA and AA,Mann-Whitney testing.There were no significant differences between AA and CA.Americans (2).We also show that high risk was associated with not only lower colonic levels of the colonic health-promoting major SCFAs (acetate,propionate,and butyrate)but conversely with higher branched chain fatty acids.This provides evidence that the dietary residues entering the colon differed between the populations,with a predominance of carbohydrate residues in Africans and protein residues in Americans,reflecting the higher dietary protein intake in Americans (107±9.3vs.58±4g/d).Our investigations do not,however,shed light on the reasons why AAs have a higher risk of colon cancer than CAs,TABLE 2The colonic content of minor and branched short chain fatty acids (mmole/total evacuates)AcidAfrican Americans (n =12)Caucasian Americans (n =10)Native Africans (n =13)Isobutyric0.53(0.11)0.63(0.11)0.76(0.16)2-Methylbutyric 1.02(0.30) 1.09(0.29)0.89(0.25)and Isovaleric Valeric 0.80(0.18) 1.54(0.82) 1.37(0.25)Hexanoic0.18(0.07)0.28(0.07)0.42(0.14)2-Methylvaleric0.07(0.04)0.20(0.09)0.001(0.001)∗Results are expressed as group mean value followed by standard error in brackets.∗P <0.05vs.African Americans and Caucasian Americans,Mann-Whitney testing.BILE ACIDS,SHORT-CHAIN FATTY ACIDS,AND COLON CANCER RISK39probably because the differences in diet and colonic microbiota are very much smaller between American subpopulations.Con-sequently,much larger study populations would be needed to provide sufficient power to answer this question.What is clear is that the meat and fat consumption is known from national surveys to be highest in the AA population(1).There is substantial experimental evidence linking secondary bile acids to colonic carcinogenesis.Secondary bile acid-induced mucosal proliferation may be the key step in the as-sociation between bile acids and colon carcinogenesis(14,15). Lithocholic acid,a secondary bile acid,can disrupt the integrity of the cell membrane of colonic mucosal cells,thus causing in-creased mucosal proliferation(16).Deoxycholic acid,another secondary bile acid,can release prostaglandin E2from colonic tissues,enhance the release of arachidonate from colonocytes, and have a direct stimulatory effect on a subclass of protein kinase enzymes that appear to play a critical role in tumor promotion and in the action of increases in the colonic accu-mulation of lipoxygenase production(17).Secondary bile acids (lithocholic and deoxycholic acid)also have comutagenic ef-fects.Among components contributing to fecal mutagenicity were reactive glyceryl ethers,known as fecapentaenes,whose biosynthesis might be stimulated by these2secondary bile acids (18).There is also evidence that primary and conjugated bile acids may also exert colonic injury.For example,chenodeoxycholate, one of the primary cholic acids,has been found to have geno-toxic effects on both normal and human colonic tumor cells(19), and in an in vitro study reported by Cheng et al.,conjugated taurolithocholic acid,taurodeocycholic acid,and glycodeoxy-cholic acid were also found to stimulate the proliferation of human colon cancer cells(H508)through activating the p44/42 MAPK signaling cascade(15).Hydrophobic bile salts,such as glycochenodeoxycholic and taurochenodeoxycholic acids,have been shown experimentally to impair mitochondrial function, leading to an inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and en-hanced formation of toxic oxygen species by the mitochondrial respiratory chain in human hepatocyte(20).The authors spec-ulated that this caused oxidative stress and ATP depletion with an increase in Ca2+concentration with stimulation of hydro-lases,which could lead to hydrolysis of lipid membranes and structural proteins,causing cell death by necrosis(20).The diet of the AAs and CAs was characteristically Western-ized,rich in meat and saturated fats,whereas the NAs’diet was low in meat and saturated fat and high in complex carbohydrate (21).Interestingly,our most recent studies have shown that the totalfiber content of the modern African diet is not high be-cause traditional foods are less commonly consumed and most of the diet consists of refined maize(corn)meal(22),unlike that described by Burkitt in the1970s(23).However,the method of cooking and eating the maize meal as a porridge results in an increase in resistant starch,which acts in the same way as fiber in the colon,being a substrate for microbial fermentation and SCFA production.We have previously demonstrated,using breath hydrogen and methane production,that about10–20% of the maize meal is resistant to small bowel digestion(13), although it was estimated that less than5%of American starch was resistant.Furthermore,it has been recognized for many years that up to20%of digestible starch is malabsorbed by the small intestine,and thus a high-carbohydrate diet,such as that consumed by Africans,will also contribute more colonic carbo-hydrate to bacterial fermentation(24–26).In keeping with this, Duncan et al.(27)demonstrated that carbohydrate restriction suppressed populations of the colonic microbiota most respon-sible for butyrate production.In this study,obese human subjects consumed diets with normal,reduced,or dramatically reduced carbohydrate content.Fecal concentrations of all3major SC-FAs decreased with reduced total carbohydrate intake but,in particular,the concentration of butyrate decreased from17.7to 4.4mM.In parallel,the major bacterial populations(Roseburia spp.and Eubacterium rectale)that produce butyrate decreased on average from11.4%to3.3%of total bacteria.Several other studies have shown that fecal SCFA are de-creased in populations with a high colon cancer risk.Clausen et al.found that the ratio of butyrate to total SCFA in feces was reduced in patients with colonic adenomas compared with healthy controls(28).Bradburn et al.(29)examined stool sam-ples from20patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and 11normal controls in the UK.They postulated that decreased butyric acid production by colonic carbohydrate fermentation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis may predispose to colorectal cancer.Although these studies do not prove that SCFA production was lower in high-risk populations,the results of our comparison of fecal and total colonic SCFAs support this extrapolation.The use of fecal SCFA concentrations as an in-dex of total SCFAs production can be criticized,as most of the SCFA production is in the proximal colon,and a substantial portion will have been absorbed by the time the effluent exits with feces.In the present study,fecal concentrations were pre-dictive of total colonic evacuate SCFAs supporting the use of simple fecal analysis to assess total colonic SCFA production in normal healthy volunteers.This might not,however,hold true for patients with increased colonic transit or diarrhea(30).Fi-nally,in vivo studies have demonstrated that increased colonic butyrate levels correlate with a decreased incidence of colon cancer(31,32)and in vitro studies have shown that butyrate inhibits cell proliferation,induces differentiation,and promotes apoptosis(33–36).In our earlier studies,we confirmed that the high SCFA fecal concentrations in Africans was associated with a reduced colonic epithelial proliferation rate[9].The present study shows that colonic branched SCFAs(2-methlvaleric acid)were significantly higher in both American groups.This can be explained by the higher protein intake of AAs(i.e.,94±9.3vs.58±4.1g/d)as BCFA are synthe-sized by the microbiota from undigested protein residues(37). The role of BCFA in colonic health has not,to our knowledge, been investigated;the possibility that BCFA or the bacteria that produce them is injurious needs to be investigated.40J.OU ET AL.In conclusion,our results support our hypothesis that the higher risk of colon cancer in Americans compared to Africans may be explained by the consumption of typical Westernized diets that are rich in fat and low in complex carbohydrate.Such diets produce a2-hit insult on the colonic epithelium by stimulat-ing the microbiota to produce toxic metabolites and suppressing them from synthesizing health-producing SCFAs.Further stud-ies are needed to test our hypothesis that cancer risk can be modified by altering the balance between dietary carbohydrate and animal protein and fat.REFERENCES1.Sharma S and O’Keefe SJD:Environmental influences on the high mor-tality from colorectal cancer in African Americans.Postgrad Med J83, 583–589,2007.2.O’Keefe SJD,Chung D,Mahmoud N,Sepulveda AR,and Manafe M:Why do African Americans get more colon cancer than Native Africans?J Nutr137,175S–182S,2007.3.Doll R and Peto R:The causes of cancer:quantitative estimates of avoid-able risks of cancer in the United States today.J Natl Cancer Inst66, 1191–1308,1981.4.Bresalier RS and Kim YS:Diet and colon cancer.New Engl J Med313,1413–1414,1985.5.Young VB and Schmidt TM:Antibiotic-associated diarrhea accompaniedby large-scale alterations in the composition of the fecal microbiota.J Clin Microbiol42,1203–1206,2004.6.Markus S,Veerle R,Dieter S,and Jurgen S,et al.:Combined treatment ofCaco-2cells with butyrate and mesalazine inhibits cell proliferation and reduces Survivin protein level.Cancer Lett273,98–106,2009.7.Rose P,Moore PK,Ming SH,Nam OC,Armstrong JS,et al.:Hydrogensulfide protects colon cancer cells from chemopreventative agent beta-phenylethyl isothiocyanate induced apoptosis.World J Gastroenterol11, 3990–3997,2005.8.Ridlon JM,Kang D-J,and Hylemon PB:Bile salt biotransformations byhuman intestinal bacteria.J Lipid Res47,241–259,2006.9.O’Keefe SJD,et al.:Products of the Colonic microbiota mediate the effectsof diet on colon cancer risk.J Nutr139,2044–2048,2009.10.Cummings J:Short chain fatty acids in the human colon.Gut22,763–779,1981.11.Tagliacozzi D,et al.:Quantitative analysis of bile acids in human plasmaby liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry:a sim-ple and rapid one-step method.Clin Chemistry Lab Med41,1633–1641,2005.12.Scheppach W,Fabian C,and Kasper H:Fecal short-chain fatty acid(SCFA)analysis by capillary gas-liquid chromatography.Am J Clin Nutr 46,641–646,1987.13.O’Keefe SJ,Kidd M,Espitalier-Noel G,and Owira P:The rarity of coloncancer in Africans is associated with low animal product consumption, notfiber.Am J Gastroenterol94,1373–1380,1999.14.Terpstra OT,Van Blankenstein M,Dees J,and Eilers GA:Abnor-mal pattern of cell proliferation in the entire colonic mucosa of pa-tients with colon adenoma or cancer.Gastroenterology92,704–708, 1987.15.Cheng K and Raufman J-P:Bile acid-induced proliferation of a humancolon cancer cell line is mediated by transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptors.Biochem Pharmacol70,1035–1047,2005.16.Kozoni V,Tsioulias G,Shiff S,Rigas B,et al.:The effect of lithocholicacid on proliferation and apoptosis during the early stages of colon car-cinogenesis:differential effect on apoptosis in the presence of a colon carcinogen.Carcinogenesis21,999–1005,2000.17.DeRubertis FR,Craven PA,and Saito R:Bile salt stimulation of colonicepithelial proliferation.Evidence for involvement of lipoxygenase prod-ucts.Journal Clin Invest74,1614–1624,1984.18.Wilpart M and Roberfroid M:Effects of secondary biliary acidson the mutagenicity of N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine,2-acetylaminofluorene and2-nitrofluorene towards Salmonella typhimurium strains.Carcinogenesis7,703–706,1986.19.Jurek D,Fleckl E,Marian B:Bile acid induced gene expression in LT97colonic adenoma cells.Food Chem Toxico43,87–93,2005.20.Rosser BG and Gores GJ:Liver cell necrosis:mechanisms and clinicalimplications.Gastroenterology108,252–272,1995.21.Cummings J,et al.:The effect of meat protein and dietaryfiber on colonicfunction and metabolism.II.Bacterial metabolites in feces and urine.Am J Clin Nutr32,2094–2101,1979.22.O’Keefe SJD:The African way of life and colon cancer risk.Am J Gas-troenterol96,3220–3221,2001.23.Burkitt D:Diseases of the alimentary tract and western diets.Pathol Mi-crobiol39,177–186,1971.24.Hudson GJ and Englyst HN:Dietary intakes of starch and non-starchpolysaccharides in a West African village.Br J Nutr73,655–666,1995.ler T and Wolin M:Fermentations by saccharolytic intestinal bacteria.Am J Clin Nutr32,164–172,1979.26.Macfarlane S and Macfarlane GT:R egulation of short-chain fatty acidproduction.Proc Nutr Soc62,67–72,2003.27.Duncan SH,et al.:Reduced dietary intake of carbohydrates by obesesubjects results in decreased concentrations of butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria in feces.Appl Environ Microbiol73,1073–1078,2007.28.Clausen MR,Bonnen H,and Mortensen PB:Colonic fermentation ofdietaryfibre to short chain fatty acids in patients with adenomatous polyps and colonic cancer.Gut32,923–928,1991.29.Bradburn DM,et al.:Colonic fermentation of complex carbohydrates inpatients with familial adenomatous polyposis.Gut34,630–636,1993. 30.Treem WR,et al.:Fecal short-chain fatty acids in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome:in vitro studies of carbohydrate fermentation.J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr23,280–286,1996.31.Avivi-Green C,Polak-Charcon S,Madar Z,and Schwartz B:Apoptosiscascade proteins are regulated in vivo by high intracolonic butyrate con-centration:correlation with colon cancer inhibition.Oncol Res12,83–95, 2000.32.Perrin P,Pierre F,Patry Y,Champ M,Berreur M,et al.:Onlyfibrespromoting a stable butyrate producing colonic ecosystem decrease the rate of aberrant crypt foci in rats.Gut48,53–61,2001.33.Mariadason JM,Rickard KL,Barkla DH,Augenlicht LH,et al.:Diver-gent phenotypic patterns and commitment to apoptosis of Caco-2cells during spontaneous and butyrate-induced differentiation.J Cell Physiol 183,347–354,2000.34.Bordonaro M,et al.:Butyrate-induced apoptotic cascade in colonic car-cinoma cells:modulation of the{beta}-catenin-tcf pathway and concor-dance with effects of sulindac and trichostatin a but not curcumin.Cell Growth Diff10,713–720,1999.35.Coradini D,et al.:Sodium butyrate modulates cell cycle-related proteinsin HT29human colonic adenocarcinoma cells.Cell Prolif33,139–146, 2000.36.McBain JA,Eastman A,Nobel CS,Mueller GC,et al.:Apoptotic death inadenocarcinoma cell lines induced by butyrate and other histone deacety-lase inhibitors.Biochem Pharmacol53,1357–1368,1997.37.Cummings JP,Pomare EW,Branch WJ,Naylor CP and Macfarlane GT:Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine,portal,hepatic and venous blood.Gut28,1221–1227,1987.。