英语作文评价量规表
15分英语作文评分表
15分英语作文评分表英文回答：Writing Scorecard.Content and Development (5 points)。
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the prompt and develops a well-organized response.Provides specific examples and evidence to support ideas.Uses transition words to connect ideas and ensure coherence.Offers a logical and convincing analysis or argument.Shows evidence of research and critical thinking.Organization (3 points)。
Presents a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.Uses headings or subheadings to organize information effectively.Follows a logical flow of ideas and maintains focus throughout the writing.Transitions smoothly between paragraphs.Uses signposting words and phrases to guide the reader.Style and Language (3 points)。
Uses appropriate vocabulary and sentence structure.Demonstrates command of grammar and mechanics.Employs effective writing techniques (e.g., vividimagery, sensory details, parallel structure).Varies sentence length and structure to create rhythm and interest.Avoids unnecessary repetition and wordiness.Conventions (2 points)。
英语作文量化评价表格模板
英语作文量化评价表格模板Title: Quantitative Evaluation Table Template for English Writing。
Introduction。
English writing is an essential skill that is often evaluated through various criteria. One effective way to evaluate English writing is through a quantitative evaluation table template. This template allows for a systematic and comprehensive assessment of various aspects of writing, providing a clear and objective measure of a writer's proficiency. In this article, we will explore the key components of a quantitative evaluation table template for English writing and discuss its significance in assessing writing skills.Quantitative Evaluation Table Template。
The quantitative evaluation table template for Englishwriting typically includes several key components that are used to assess the quality of a piece of writing. These components may include:1. Grammar and Mechanics: This section evaluates the writer's command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. It assesses the accuracy and correctness of the language used in the writing.2. Vocabulary and Word Choice: This section focuses on the writer's use of vocabulary and the appropriateness of word choice. It evaluates the richness and precision of the language used in the writing.3. Organization and Structure: This section assesses the overall organization and structure of the writing. It looks at the coherence and logical flow of ideas, as well as the effectiveness of the introduction, body, and conclusion.4. Content and Development: This section evaluates the depth and relevance of the content. It assesses thewriter's ability to develop and support ideas, provide evidence, and maintain a clear focus throughout the writing.5. Style and Tone: This section focuses on the writer's style and tone. It evaluates the writer's ability to convey a specific tone or voice, as well as the overall style and expression of the writing.Significance of Quantitative Evaluation Table Template。
全国卷高考英语作文评分标准(表格版,全网独有)
杂语法结构或词汇所致
1d
1.1 附件1：ace与GBT19011-2008标准主要差异性分析 ⑷应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑达到了预期的写
作目的
Ⅲ.第三档(适当)：(11-15分)基本
⑴虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容
完成了试题规定的任务
⑵应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求
⑶有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解
5.拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面，评分时，应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。英、美 拼写汉词汇用法均可接受。
6.如书写较差，以至影响交际，将分数降低一个档次。
Ⅰ.第五档(很好);
⑴覆盖所有内容要点
(21-25分)：完全完成了试题规定
⑵应用了较多的语法结构和词汇
的任务
⑶语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较
1.1 附件1：ace与GBT19011-2008标准主要差异性分析
全国卷高考英语作文评分标准
1.本题总分为25分，按5个档次给分。 2.评分时，先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次
的要求来衡量，确定或调整档次，最后给分。 3.词数少于80和多于 120的，从总分中减去2分。
4.评分时，应注意的主要内容为：内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性、上下文的连贯 性。
高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力
⑷有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑完全达到了预
期的写作目的
Ⅱ.第四档(好)：(16-20分)完全完
⑴虽漏掉1、2个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容
成了试题规定的任务
⑵应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求
⑶语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要是因尝试较复
书信英语作文的评价表及建议
书信英语作文的评价表及建议英文回答：Evaluation Rubric for Letter Writing in English.Content and Structure.Focus and Organization: The letter is focused on the assigned topic and is organized logically, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.Content Development: The letter provides specific and relevant details to support the main points.Paragraphing: Paragraphs are well-structured and effectively transition between ideas.Language Use.Vocabulary: The letter demonstrates a range ofappropriate vocabulary relevant to the topic.Grammar: The letter is grammatically accurate, with correct sentence structure and verb tenses.Fluency: The letter is written in a clear and concise style, using appropriate transitions and avoiding repetition.Mechanics.Formatting: The letter is properly formatted with correct margins, spacing, and indentation.Punctuation: The letter uses appropriate punctuation to enhance clarity and meaning.Spelling: All words are spelled correctly.Recommendation.To improve your letter writing skills in English,consider the following suggestions:Brainstorm and Plan: Before writing, take time to generate ideas and outline the structure of your letter.Use Specific and Relevant Details: Support your main points with specific examples and evidence.Organize Paragraphs Effectively: Each paragraph should focus on a particular idea or aspect of the topic.Expand Vocabulary: Read widely and incorporate new words into your writing.Review Grammar Rules: Ensure you understand basic grammar principles and apply them correctly.Get Feedback: Ask a teacher, classmate, or native speaker to review your writing and provide constructive criticism.中文回答：书信英语作文评价表。
全国卷高考英语作文评分标准(表格版,全网独有)【范本模板】
⑴漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容
未恰当完成试题规定的任务
⑵语法结构单调、词汇项目有限
⑶有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响了对写作内容 的理解
⑷较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性信息未能
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
清楚地传达给读者
Ⅴ.第一档(差）:
⑴明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理
（1—5 分)未完成试题规定的 解试题要求
⑷有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑
完全达到了预期的写作目的
Ⅱ.第四档（好)：（16—20 分) 完全完成了试题规定的任务
⑴虽漏掉 1、2 个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容 ⑵应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求
⑶语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要 是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致
⑷应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑达 到了预期的写作目的
任务
⑵语法结构单调、词汇项目有限
⑶较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响对写作内容的理解
⑷缺乏语句间的连接成分，内容不连贯信息未能传达给读者
全国卷高考英语作文评分标准
1。本题总分为 25 分，按 5 个档次给分.
2。评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次，然后以该档次 的
要求来衡量,确定或调整档次，最后给分。
3.词数少于 80 和多于 120 的，从总分中减去 2 分。
4.评分时，应注意的主要内容为:内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和
准确性、上下文的连贯性。
5.拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面，评分时,应视其对交际的影响
程度予以考虑。英、美拼写汉词汇用法均可接受.
6.如书写较差，以至影响交际,将分数降低一个档次。
英语写作评价量规
作文得分
信息点
语法运用
文章逻辑
书写及字数
第一档
13-15
信息点齐全
人称无误，时态准确，个别语法错误
意思表达完整通顺，文章逻辑性强，整体感觉好
字体端正，书面整洁，够字数
第二档
10-12
信息点齐全
人称无误，时态基本准确，存在少量语法错误
意思表达基本完整通顺，文章逻辑性强，整体感觉好
字体端正，书面整洁，够字数
意思表达不清楚，不连贯，整体感觉不好字体不端正，书面ຫໍສະໝຸດ 整洁，不够字数自评文章得分
我认为自己的文章可以评为第（）档，得（）分。
同伴互评得分
同伴认为这篇文章可以评为第（）档，得（）分。
教师评价得分
教师认为这篇文章可以评为第（）档，得（）分。
写作评价量表
第三档
8-9
信息点较齐全
人称无误，时态基本准确，有一些语法错误
意思表达尚清楚连贯，文章逻辑性较强，整体感觉较好
字体较端正，书面较整洁，够字数
第四档
5-7
涉及部分信息点
写少量句子，语法错误较多
意思表达不清晰，不连贯。整体感觉不好
字体较端正，书面较整洁，不够字数
第五档
0-4
所写内容不符合信息点要求
只写个别单词，语法错误很多
全国卷高考英语作文评分标准表格版全网独有
是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致
⑷应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑达
到了预期的写作目的
Ⅲ.第三档(适当)：(11-15 分)
基本完成了试题规定的任务
⑴虽漏掉一些内容，但覆盖所有主要内容
⑵应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求
⑶有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，但不影响理解
⑷应用简单的语句间的连接成分，使全文内容连贯整体而 言，基本达到了预期的写作目的
Ⅳ.第二档(较差)：(6-10 分)未 恰当完成试题规定的任务
⑴漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容，写了一些无关内容 ⑵语法结构单调、词汇项目有限 ⑶有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响了对写作内容 的理解
⑷较少使用语句间的连接成分，内容缺少连贯性信息未能 清楚地传达给读者
Ⅴ.第一档(差)： (1-5 分)未完成试题规定的任 务
5.拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面，评分时，应视其对交际的影响 程度予以考虑。英、美拼写汉词汇用法均可接受。
6.如书写较差，以至影响交际，将分数降低一个档次。
⑴覆盖所有内容要点
Ⅰ.第五档(很好);
(21-25 分)：完全完成了试题规⑵应用了较多的语法 Nhomakorabea构和词汇
定的任务
⑶语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误，但为尽力使用较
复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力
⑷有效地使用了语句间的连接成分，使全文结构紧凑 完全达到了预期的写作目的
Ⅱ.第四档(好)：(16-20 分)完全
⑴虽漏掉 1、2 个次重点，但覆盖所有主要内容
完成了试题规定的任务
⑵应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求
⑶语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确，些许错误主要
⑴明显遗漏主要内容，写了一些无关内容，原因可能是未理 解试题要求 ⑵语法结构单调、词汇项目有限 ⑶较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误，影响对写作内容的理解 ⑷缺乏语句间的连接成分，内容不连贯信息未能传达给读者
初中英语作文打分标准表
初中英语作文打分标准表回答1:Title: Grading Criteria for Junior High School English CompositionsGrading Criteria for Junior High School English CompositionsEnglish:When grading junior high school English compositions, several key criteria should be taken into consideration to fairly and accurately assess students' writing. The following are the grading criteria for junior high school English compositions:Content (30 points)The content of the composition is the most important aspect and should make up a significant portion of the overall grade. The composition should demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and effectively communicate the main ideas. It should be well-organized with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.Additionally, the content should be relevant, insightful, and demonstrate critical thinking.Language Use (25 points)Language use is crucial in evaluating a student's English composition. The writing should display a good command of vocabulary, grammar, and sentence structure appropriate for the student's level. The use of varied and sophisticated vocabulary, as well as accurate and complex sentence structures, should be rewarded.Coherence and Cohesion (20 points)The composition should exhibit a logical sequence of ideas with smooth transitions between sentences and paragraphs. The overall coherence and cohesion of the writing should be emphasized, as it contributes to the overall quality of the composition.Creativity (15 points)Originality and creativity should be valued in students' compositions. The ability to present ideas in an imaginative and engaging manner should be recognized and rewarded. Creativeuse of language and unique perspectives should be encouraged and acknowledged.Mechanics (10 points)Mechanics, including spelling, punctuation, and formatting, play a role in the overall presentation of the composition. While not as heavily weighted as other criteria, attention to detail and accuracy in mechanics should still be assessed.Overall ImpressionIn addition to the specific grading criteria listed above, overall impression should also be taken into account. Awell-written composition that leaves a strong impact on the reader should be recognized and reflected in the final grade.These grading criteria provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating junior high school English compositions, ensuring that students' writing abilities are thoroughly and fairly assessed.Chinese:初中英语作文打分标准初中英语作文打分标准对于公平和准确地评估学生的写作能力来说非常重要。
小学英语作文得分标准表格英文版
小学英语作文得分标准表格英文版Grading Criteria for Elementary School English CompositionsWhen grading English compositions written by elementary school students, teachers use a set of criteria to assess the overall quality of the writing. These criteria focus on different aspects of English language proficiency, such as grammar, vocabulary, organization, and creativity. Below is a grading criteria table that can be used as a reference for evaluating elementary school English compositions.| Criteria | Description| Points ||---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|| Grammar | Correct usage of English grammar and sentence structures. | 25 || Vocabulary | Diverse and appropriate use of words and phrases. | 20 || Organization | Logical flow of ideas, clear introduction, body, and conclusion. | 20 || Creativity | Originality and creativity in expressing ideas and thoughts. | 15 || Clarity and Coherence | Clarity of expression and coherence in connecting ideas. | 10 || Spelling and Punctuation | Accurate spelling and appropriate use of punctuation marks. | 10|Total Points: 100Each criterion is assigned a certain number of points, and the total points add up to 100. Teachers can use this table to provide feedback to students on their compositions and help them understand where they need to improve. By focusing on these key areas, students can enhance their English writing skills and become more proficient in expressing themselves in written form.Grading compositions can be a subjective process, but having a clear set of criteria can help ensure consistency and fairness in assessment. Teachers may also provide specific feedback on areas that need improvement, along with suggestions for further practice and development. With consistent practice and guidance, elementary school studentscan improve their English writing skills and become more confident in their abilities to communicate effectively in written form.。
英语作文自评表格模板
英语作文自评表格模板Self-Assessment Rubric for English Essay.Introduction.This self-assessment rubric is designed to provide a framework for students to evaluate their own essays. It is important to be honest and critical in your assessment in order to identify areas for improvement.Criteria.The following criteria will be used to assess your essay:Content and Organization.Thesis Statement.Paragraph Development.Sentence Structure.Vocabulary.Grammar and Mechanics.Scoring.Each criterion will be scored on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest score.Instructions.Please read through each criterion carefully and provide a score for your essay. Be sure to provide specific examples to support your评分.Scoring Rubric.Content and Organization.1. Does the essay have a clear and focused thesis statement?2. Is the essay well-organized and easy to follow?3. Are the paragraphs well-developed and supported with evidence?4. Does the essay provide a strong conclusion that summarizes the main points?Thesis Statement.1. Is the thesis statement clear and concise?2. Does the thesis statement accurately reflect the content of the essay?3. Is the thesis statement supported by evidence throughout the essay?Paragraph Development.1. Do the paragraphs have a clear topic sentence?2. Are the paragraphs well-developed and supported with evidence?3. Do the paragraphs flow smoothly from one to the next?Sentence Structure.1. Are the sentences grammatically correct?2. Are the sentences varied in length and structure?3. Are the sentences clear and concise?Vocabulary.1. Is the vocabulary appropriate for the audience and purpose of the essay?2. Are the words used correctly?3. Is the vocabulary varied and interesting?Grammar and Mechanics.1. Is the essay free of grammatical errors?2. Is the essay free of spelling errors?3. Is the essay formatted correctly?Comments.In addition to the scoring, please provide any other comments or suggestions that you have for improving your essay.中文回答。
小学英语作文英语评价表
小学英语作文英语评价表{z}**Elementary English Composition Evaluation Form**---**Student Information:**- Name: ____________________________- Class: ____________________________- Date of Assessment: ________________---**Criteria for Evaluation:**1.**Content (20pts):**- Storyline: Is the story coherent and engaging?- Ideas: Are the ideas clear and creative?- Details: Are there sufficient details to support the main idea?2.**Grammar (20pts):**- Sentence Structure: Does the student use a variety of sentence structures?- Verb tense and agreement: Are verbs correctly tense and in agreement with their subjects?- Punctuation and capitalization: Is the writing punctuated correctly, and are capitalization rules followed?3.**Vocabulary (20pts):**- Word choice: Are words used appropriately and effectively?- Variety: Does the student use a range of vocabulary?- Sentence Fluency: Does the student use interesting words to create fluent sentences?4.**Spelling and Punctuation (15pts):**- Are words spelled correctly?- Is punctuation used correctly, including dialogue and lists?5.**Conventions (10pts):**- Does the student use a title and proper margins?- Are paragraphs used appropriately?- Is the essay organized with an introduction, body, and conclusion?6.**Complete Sentences (10pts):**- Are all sentences complete and well-structured?7.**Handwriting (5pts):**- Is the handwriting legible and neat?---**Total Points: 100pts**---**Evaluator"s Comments:**[Evaluator"s Signature: ____________________]---**Student"s Reflection:**[Student"s Signature: ____________________][Date: ____________________________]---**Note to Teacher:**[Additional comments or feedback for the teacher]---This evaluation form is designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of a student"s English composition skills, focusing on various aspects such as content, grammar, vocabulary, spelling, punctuation, conventions, sentence structure, and handwriting.It aims to encourage students to develop their language skills while providing them with constructive feedback to improve their writing abilities.。
英语作文评价表
英语作文评价表Title: English Essay Evaluation Form。
Name: [Student's Name]Date: [Date of Submission]Introduction:The introduction effectively introduces the topic and provides clear context for the essay.Content & Development:1. Thesis Statement: Is the thesis statement clear and focused? Does it provide a roadmap for the essay?2. Supporting Points: Are the main points clearly articulated and adequately supported with evidence or examples?3. Organization: Does the essay have a logical structure with smooth transitions between paragraphs and ideas?4. Depth of Analysis: Does the essay demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the topic? Are arguments well-developed and insightful?Language & Style:1. Clarity: Is the language clear and easy to understand? Are complex ideas expressed in a straightforward manner?2. Coherence: Are sentences and paragraphs well-connected, leading to a smooth flow of ideas?3. Conciseness: Does the writer avoid unnecessary repetition or wordiness? Is the writing concise and to the point?4. Vocabulary: Does the writer demonstrate a strong command of vocabulary appropriate for the topic and audience?5. Tone: Is the tone appropriate for the purpose and audience of the essay? Does it maintain professionalism and respectfulness?Mechanics & Conventions:1. Grammar: Are there any grammatical errors or awkward constructions that impede understanding?2. Punctuation: Are punctuation marks used correctly and consistently throughout the essay?3. Spelling: Are there any spelling errors or typosthat detract from the overall quality of the writing?4. Formatting: Is the essay formatted according to the guidelines provided? (Font, spacing, margins, etc.)。
英语作文量化评价表模板
英语作文量化评价表模板Title: Quantitative Evaluation Table Template for English Composition。
Introduction。
In order to effectively evaluate and assess English compositions, a quantitative evaluation table template can be used. This template provides a structured and systematic approach to assessing various aspects of an English composition, including content, organization, language use, and mechanics. By using this template, teachers, students, and writers can objectively measure the quality of a composition and identify areas for improvement.Content。
The content section of the quantitative evaluation table template focuses on the relevance, accuracy, and depth of the information presented in the composition. It assesses whether the content is appropriate for the intended audience and purpose, and whether it effectively conveys the main ideas and supporting details. The content section may include criteria such as the clarity of the thesis statement, the development of ideas, the use of evidence and examples, and the overall coherence of the composition.Organization。
作文评分表 英文
作文评分表英文1. The essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and effectively conveys the writer's thoughts and ideas. The language used is clear and concise, making it easy for the reader to follow along.2. The writer effectively utilizes a variety of vocabulary and sentence structures to express their ideas, which adds depth and complexity to the essay. This demonstrates a strong command of the English language.3. The essay shows a strong ability to organize and present ideas in a coherent manner. The writer effectively transitions between different points and maintains a clear focus throughout the essay.4. The writer demonstrates a strong ability to support their arguments with relevant evidence and examples. This adds credibility to the essay and shows a thoughtful approach to the topic.5. The essay effectively engages the reader and maintains their interest throughout. The writer's voice is compelling and adds a personal touch to the essay.6. The essay effectively addresses any potential counterarguments and provides a well-reasoned response. This demonstrates a thoughtful and nuanced understanding of the topic.7. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and leaves a lasting impression on the reader. It provides a sense of closure while also encouraging further reflection on the topic.。
初中英语作文评分等级表
初中英语作文评分等级表Composition Scoring Rubric for Junior High School EnglishLevel 5 - Excellent (25-30 points)- The composition demonstrates a high level of proficiency in English.- The content is creative, well-organized, and provides in-depth development of the topic.- The essay has a clear and compelling thesis statement.- Sentences are well-structured, varied in length and complexity, and free from grammatical errors.- Vocabulary usage is extensive and accurate, with appropriate idiomatic expressions.- Punctuation and spelling are flawless.- The composition effectively engages the reader and displays advanced writing skills.Level 4 - Good (20-24 points)- The composition shows a good level of English proficiency.- The content is well-organized and develops the topic adequately.- The essay has a clear thesis statement, although it may not be as compelling as in Level 5.- Sentences are generally well-structured, with some variety in length and complexity.- Vocabulary usage is appropriate, with a few errors in word choiceor idiomatic expressions.- Punctuation and spelling errors are minimal and do not detract from the overall quality.- The composition is engaging and demonstrates competent writing skills.Level 3 - Fair (15-19 points)- The composition indicates a moderate level of English proficiency.- The content is somewhat organized, but may lack depth in the development of the topic.- The essay's thesis statement may be present but is not clearly articulated.- Sentences are mostly simple and may lack variety or show some grammatical errors.- Vocabulary usage is adequate, but with some errors in word choice or idiomatic expressions.- Punctuation and spelling contain some errors, which may slightly hinder comprehension.- The composition is generally coherent but lacks engagement and sophistication in writing style.Level 2 - Poor (10-14 points)- The composition reflects a low level of English proficiency.- The content is poorly organized, with limited development of thetopic.- The essay lacks a clear thesis statement.- Sentences are simple and often contain grammatical errors.- Vocabulary usage is limited, with frequent errors in word choice or idiomatic expressions.- Punctuation and spelling are problematic, which can impede comprehension.- The composition is difficult to follow and shows weak writing skills.Level 1 - Very Poor (0-9 points)- The composition shows a very low level of English proficiency.- The content is disorganized, lacking a clear focus and development of the topic.- Sentences are often incoherent and filled with grammatical errors.- Vocabulary usage is inadequate, with significant errors in word choice and idiomatic expressions.- Punctuation and spelling are rampant, making the composition difficult to understand.- The essay lacks structure, clarity, and demonstrates a lack of basic writing skills.。
写景英语作文评价标准表
写景英语作文评价标准表Evaluation Rubric for Descriptive Landscape Writing.Content and Organization.Accuracy and Specificity: The writing accurately and vividly depicts the landscape, using specific sensory details and descriptive language.Scope and Depth: The writing covers a comprehensive range of landscape elements, exploring both general features and individual details.Organization: The writing is well-organized, with a clear structure and logical progression of ideas.Sensory Description.Visual Imagery: The writing creates a vivid visual impression of the landscape, using descriptive words thatappeal to the sense of sight.Auditory Description: The writing effectively captures the sounds of the landscape, using devices such as onomatopoeia and alliteration.Tactile and Kinesthetic Description: The writingevokes sensations of touch and movement, allowing thereader to experience the landscape physically.Olfactory and Gustatory Description: The writing incorporates scents and flavors to enhance the reader's sensory experience of the landscape.Language and Style.Figurative Language: The writing uses figurative language, such as metaphors, similes, and personification,to create vivid and original descriptions.Literary Devices: The writing employs literary devices, such as parallelism, antithesis, and repetition, to createrhythm and emphasis.Sentence Structure: The writing varies sentence length and structure to maintain reader interest and create a natural flow.Word Choice: The writing uses precise and evocative vocabulary, choosing words that are both descriptive and meaningful.Mood and Atmosphere.Sensory Immersion: The writing immerses the reader in the sensory details of the landscape, evoking a vivid and memorable atmosphere.Emotional Impact: The writing conveys the emotional impact of the landscape, whether it evokes a sense of awe, tranquility, or any other emotion.Symbolism and Metaphor: The writing may use symbolism and metaphor to suggest deeper meanings or connectionswithin the landscape.Overall Impression.Originality and Creativity: The writing presents unique and unexpected perspectives on the landscape, offering fresh and thought-provoking insights.Flow and Readability: The writing is engaging and easy to read, with a smooth flow that keeps the reader interested.Depth of Understanding: The writing demonstrates a deep understanding and appreciation of the landscape, revealing the author's personal connection to the environment.。
英语作文评分标准表
主体段落有主题句及次主题句,但未能概括中心
能按要求完成四段式作文,但欠条理性和衔接性。主体段落有主题句及次主题句，但未能概括中心
未能按要求完成四段式作文。篇章结构紊乱。主体段落无主题句及次主题句。
4
3
2
1
0
4．卷面
（2'）
整洁
较整洁
一般
较差
差
2
1．5
1
0。5
0
评分细则：
1．内容
（5）
内容丰富,优缺点中肯，建议合理且有新意
内容较丰富，优缺点中肯，建议较合理
能列出2个以上优缺点，并提出至少一个建议
能列出1个以上优缺点，并提出至少一个建议
内容空洞，建议不切实际
5
4
3
2
0
2．语言
（4')
语言流畅连贯，措辞成熟，句式多样,基本无语法错误
语言较流畅连贯,措辞较成熟，句式多样，但存在少量语法错误
句子较规范，句式较多样，语法错误较少。但措辞欠成熟，连贯
句子较规范，但欠连贯.句式欠多样。存在一定的语法错误
语言欠规范，流畅连贯，措辞欠成熟，且存在大量语法错误4321 Nhomakorabea0
3．结构
（4)
篇章结构严谨清晰,段落过渡自然，主体段落有概括性好的主题句及次主题句
结构较紧严谨清晰，段落过渡较自然，主体段落有概括性较好的主题句及次主题句
小学英语作文得分标准表格英文版
小学英语作文得分标准表格英文版Grading Rubric for Elementary School English CompositionsHi there, friends! Today, I'm going to share with you the grading rubric our teacher uses for our English compositions. As you know, writing is a crucial skill we need to master, and our teacher wants to ensure we're on the right track. Let me break it down for you!Content (40 points)This is where the real meat of our compositions lies. Our teacher wants to see if we've understood the prompt or topic and addressed it fully. We need to make sure our writing stays focused and relevant throughout.• Focus and Coherence (20 points)Are we sticking to the main idea? Does our writing flow smoothly from one point to the next? Or are we all over the place, jumping from one unrelated thing to another? Staying focused is key!• Development of Ideas (20 points)It's not enough to just state our ideas; we need to expand on them with details, examples, and explanations. Our teacherwants to see that we've explored our thoughts thoroughly and made them clear for the reader.Organization (20 points)A well-organized piece of writing is like a carefully constructed building – everything fits together nicely. Our teacher looks for a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.• Introduction (5 points)This is where we hook the reader's attention and give them a sneak peek into what our writing is about. A strong introduction sets the stage for the rest of our composition.• Body Paragraphs (10 points)The body is where we flesh out our ideas, one by one, in separate paragraphs. Each paragraph should focus on a single main idea and support it with details.• Conclusion (5 points)The conclusion is our grand finale, where we wrap up our thoughts and leave the reader with a lasting impression. A good conclusion reinforces our main points and provides a sense of closure.Language Use (20 points)It's not just about what we say but how we say it. Our teacher wants to see that we're using English correctly and expressing ourselves effectively.• Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation (10 points)Proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation are essential for clear communication. Our teacher will be on the lookout for errors that could muddle our meaning or make our writing confusing.• Word Choice and Sentence Structure (10 points)Using a rich vocabulary and varied sentence structures can make our writing more engaging and interesting to read. Repetitive or simplistic language can quickly become dull.Mechanics (20 points)These are the nitty-gritty details that make our writing look polished and professional.• Capitalization and Formatting (10 points)Correctly capitalizing proper nouns, titles, and the beginnings of sentences shows attention to detail. Properformatting, such as indentation and spacing, also contributes to the overall neatness of our work.• Legibility and Presentation (10 points)Our teacher wants to see that we've taken pride in our work by making it as legible and visually appealing as possible. Sloppy handwriting or a messy appearance can detract from the overall quality of our compositions.Phew, that's a lot to keep in mind, right? But don't worry; our teacher is here to guide us and help us become better writers. Remember, practice makes perfect, and with each composition we write, we'll be one step closer to mastering the art of written expression.Happy writing, everyone!。
英文作文评分总表
英語看圖寫作比賽評分總表當你看到一個主題時，要先縮窄(narrow down) 所寫的題目內容。
寫任何一篇「英文作文」時，必頇要在第一段尌開宗明義地把你整篇文章想要說的話先講出來，這一句話，在英文中尌稱之為「Topic sentence」，中文通常翻譯成「主旨句」。
在開首寫出主旨句的方式，較容易引起讀者的注意，同時，便於環繞中心主題鋪陳開展下文，引導讀者了解段落大意。
主旨句必頇表達你對該題目的獨特見解，所持態度，或是理據所在，才能吸引讀者繼續看下去。
講完topic sentence，接下來的尌是所謂的supporting details，也尌是用來說明這個主旨的一些細節。
每段寫作必頇包含3大要素：(a) 主題句(topic sentence)：一開頭尌破題，以便讀者馬上明瞭文章的重點。
(b) 支持主題句(supporting topic sentences)：進一步說明或舉例。
(c)結論句(concluding sentence)：歸納主題句與支持主題句，必頇簡潔有力。
****寫段落的方法***1.按時間順序（Time）:這是一個最常用的構段方法，以事件發生先後而順序描述。
2.按空間發展（Space）: 描寫空間環境，有人喜歡由遠到近，或恰恰相反，以空間為序，隨步移而轉景，將所見到的都寫下來。
可用一些連接詞幫助句子間的聯繫(When, Then, Next, After)。
3.分類法（Classification）:如果題目範圍廣泛的話，可按其內容先歸納分類，形成小組，再研究彼此間的關係，令讀者更易明白。
4.對比法（Comparison and Contrast）:當我們要比較兩件事或兩個人時，除了指出其相同之處外，更會說明兩者不同的地方。
可有兩種方法來表達。
第一種是先詳細說明一件事物的情況，再開始另一項，又稱縱向比較（item-by-item comparison）。
第二種是同時比較兩件事物，穿插說明其異或同處，又稱為橫向比較（point-by-point comparison）。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
基本符合要求，内容不充实。(3、2、1分)
内容不充实跑题、偏题，不知所云，抄袭等。(0分)
写作
技4分)
大量使用所学固定搭配和基本句型组织写作内容不重复且表达准确。(4分)
能使用5-8个固定搭配和基本句型组织写作内容，重复少且基本表达准确。(3分)
维度
A等
B等
C等
D等
写作格式
（3分）
标点准确、大小写准确、段落清晰、字数够。(3分)
标点基本准确、大小写基本准确、段落较清晰、字数够。(2分)
标点不够准确、大小写不够准确、段落不清晰、字数不够。(1分)
标点不准确、大小写不准确、字数不段落不清晰、字数不够。(0分)
写作内容
（10分）
符合要求，内容充实。(10、9、8分)
不整洁、涂涂抹抹（0分）
自评得分
互评得分
综合得分
能使用所学3-5固定搭配和基本句型组织写作内容，有重复且有少量错误。(2分)
基本不能使用所学固定搭配和基本句型组织写作内容，错误很多。(0-1分)
时态
(4分)
能根据写作要求和写作内容选择和切换时态，准确无误。(4分)
能根据写作要求和写作内容选择和切换时态，有少量错误。(3分)
能根据写作要求和写作内容选择和切换时态，错误较多。(2分)
不能根据写作要求和写作内容选择和切换时态，错误较多。(0-1分)
逻辑
(2分)
句子之间、段落之间逻辑明显且有明显的and、but等逻辑关联词。(2分)
句子之间、段落之间逻辑不明显，关联词使用不明显。(1分)
句子之间、段落之间逻辑混乱，无关联词。（0分）
书写
(2分)
美观、无涂抹（2分）
较整洁、美观度不够、较少涂抹(1分)