波士顿咨询集团会用钱来阻止我告诉你们的故事

合集下载

爱迪生小时愚笨最终成功的故事

爱迪生小时愚笨最终成功的故事

爱迪生小时愚笨最终成功的故事托马斯·阿尔瓦·爱迪生(英语:ThomasAlvaEdison,1847年-1931年),美国电工学家、企业家,拥有众多重要的发明专利,被传媒授予“门洛帕克的奇才”称号的他,是历史上第一个利用大量生产原则和工业研究实验室来生产发明专利的人。

以下是店铺分享的爱迪生小时愚笨最终成功的故事,一起来和小编看看吧。

爱迪生小时愚笨最终成功的故事篇(一)爱迪生(1847-1931)是美国人,世界著名的大发明家。

幼年时的爱迪生曾被老师视为“低能儿”,仅仅上了三个月的小学,就被老师责令退学,从此再没跨进过学校大门。

爱迪生完全凭着勤奋自学,闯入了科学发明的天地,即使是在流浪中也不懈地进行发明创造,最终成为了闻名世界的科学巨匠。

爱迪一生共有两千多项发明,为人类做出了巨大贡献,因此被誉为造福人类的“发明大王”、“电气时代的领袖”、“科学界的拿破仑”。

爱迪生小时愚笨最终成功的故事篇(二):人物生平1854年,发生了一件对他的发展有较大影响的事,伊利湖南岸沿着湖铁路通车,使得米兰运河的商船生意大减,爱迪生父亲的生意已经没有办法再维持下去儿时的爱迪生,因为一家生活日渐困苦,为了另谋发展,爱迪生一家就此迁居,他们离开米兰搬到密歇根州休伦港北郊的格拉蒂奥特堡开始新的生活,搬到新居不久,爱迪生就患了猩红热。

[6] 撵出学校1855年,他开始上学,那所学校只有一个班级,校长和老师都是恩格尔先生。

因为爱迪生有刨根问底的天性,在上课时经常经常问老师问题一些另类的问题(如:风是怎么产生的;一加一为什么等于二而不是四),仅仅三个月的时间,就被老师以“低能儿”的名义撵出学校。

[7] 亦师亦母因为母亲南希当时是一家女子学校的教师,是一个富有教育经验的人,她不认为自己的孩子是“低能儿”,因此南希自己教授爱迪生。

据南希平日留心地观察,爱迪生不但不是“低能儿”,而且时常显出才华。

南希经常让爱迪生自己动手做实验,有一次讲到伽利略的“比萨斜塔实验”时,南希让爱迪生到自己家旁边的高塔上尝试,爱迪生拿了两个大小和重量不同的球并同时从高塔上抛下,结果两球同时落地,爱迪生觉得很神奇并兴奋地告诉母亲实验结果,这次实验也铭刻在爱迪生脑海里。

波士顿咨询集团想用钱来阻止我告诉你们的故事来源

波士顿咨询集团想用钱来阻止我告诉你们的故事来源

波士顿咨询集团想用钱来阻止我告诉你们的故事来源:波士顿咨询集团BCG是咨询业界最有名的咨询公司之一。

本文的作者是MIT校报Tech的专栏作者。

作者是MIT原子物理专业毕业的高材生,毕业后就被BCG聘用去迪拜分公司工作,直到不久前迪拜泡沫破裂离职。

作者在校报Tech上写了四篇连载,讲述他的这段经历,向读者介绍了他在迪拜的真实体验和公司的内幕。

选择了他四篇连载中的第三篇,原文标题是同系列四篇文章的链接:1.2.?3.?4.?======================================The story BCG offered me $16,000 not to tellBy?The city was strange and the society was unnerving, but what disturbed me most about my Dubai experience was my job as a business consultant for the Boston Consulting Group.I really had no idea what to expect, going in. In my mind, consulting was abou t answering business questions through analysis. It was supposed to be Excel s heets and models, sifting through data to discover profit and loss, and helpin g clients make decisions that would add the most value for themselves, and by extension, society.It was worrisome to enter a new job without any guarantee that I would be qual ified. I assumed BCG would train me, and that as it had been with MIT, intelli gence and hard work would prove sufficient. Still, I wondered what I would do if for some reason it turned out that I couldn’t get my head around the analy sis? In hindsight, analytical skills should have been the least of my worries.Stretching realityThe first clue t hat my mental picture of consulting was off came with “traini ng” in Munich. I expected instruction in Excel programming, data analysis, an d business theory. Instead, Munich turned out to be little more than a week lo ng social outing with other recently matriculated consultants and analysts wit hin the BCG’s European branches. We donned name tags, shook hands, and drank often. Classes were fluffy, and mostly consisted of discussion of high-level, almost philosophical topics. I got along well — as both an American and a mem ber of the Dubai office, I was doubly foreign and therefore double the curiosi ty.After a pleasant week of pseudo-partying, I returned to Dubai and was assigned to writing case proposals. In the consulting business, it is standard practic e for clients to write requests for proposals, describing the question they wo uld like answered. The consulting firm in turn writes a case proposal: We will answer A by having Consultant B do X, Y, and Z. A well written case proposal promises much, but is deliberately vague about what concrete things the consul tants will produce.Case proposals were despised by the rank and file — one had a dozen bosses, u nclear objectives, and virtually no coordination with co-workers. But in one s ense, the proposals were good practice for real case work. Both involved stret ching reality to fit whatever was assumed the client desired.Despite having no work or research experience outside of MIT, I was regularly advertised to clients as an expert with seemingly years of topical experience relevant to the case. We were so good at rephrasing our credentials that even I was surprised to find in each of my cases, even my very first case, that I w as the most senior consultant on the team.I quickly found out why so little had been invested in developing my Excel-cra ft. Analytical skills were overrated, for the simple reason that clients usual ly didn’t know why they had hired us. They sent us vague requests for proposa l, we returned vague case proposals, and by the time we were hired, no one was the wiser as to why exactly we were there.I got the feeling that our clients were simply trying to mimic successful busi nesses, and that as consultants, our earnings came from having the luck of bei ng included in an elaborate cargo-cult ritual. In any case it fell to us to de cide for ourselves what question we had been hired to answer, and as a matter of convenience, we elected to answer questions that we had already answered in the course of previous cases — no sense in doing new work when old work will do. The toolkit I brought with me from MIT was absolute overkill in this envi ronment. Most of my day was spent thinking up and writing PowerPoint slides. S ometimes, I didn’t even need to write them — we had a service in India that could put together pretty good copy if you provided them with a sketch and som e instructions.Burning outI worked hard at MIT. I routinely took seven to ten classes per semester and f illed whatever hours were left in the day with part-time jobs and tutoring. It was a fairly stupid way of going about my education, and I missed out on many of the learning opportunities that MIT offers outside of classes. I don’t re commend what I did to anyone. But as stupid as carrying double course loads wa s, it had one advantage: After all the long hours I put into MIT, I believed I was invincible. If MIT couldn’t burn me out, nothing else ever could.It took roughly three months before BCG disproved my “burn-out proof” theory. Putting together PowerPoint slides was easy, the hours were lenient, and the fifth day of every week usually consisting of a leisurely day away from the cl ient site. By all accounts, I should have been coasting through my tasks.What I learned is that burning out isn’t just about work load, it’s about wo rk load being greater than the motivation to do work. It was relatively easy t o drag myself to classes when I thought I was working for my own betterment. I t was hard to sit at a laptop and crank out slides when all I seemed to be acc omplishing was the transfer of wealth from my client to my company.I’m a free marketeer. I believe that voluntary exchange is not just a good me thod of incentivizing people to provide their labor and talents to society, bu t a robust moral system — goods and services represent tangible benefit to pe ople, market prices represent the true value of goods in society, and wages re present the value that a worker provides to others. Absent negative externalit ies or monopoly effects, a man receives from the free market what he gives to it, his material worth is a running tally of the net benefit that he has provi ded to his fellow man. A high income is not only justified, but there is nobil ity to it.My moral system is organized around a utilitarian principle of greatest good f or the greatest number — that which adds value cannot be wrong. It did not bo ther me therefore when I was handed consulting reports that had been stolen fr om our competitors. If the information in those reports would help us improve our client, then who could say we were doing wrong? Like downloading MP3s, it was a victimless crime.What I could not get my head around was having to force-fit analysis to a conc lusion. In one case, the question I was tasked with solving had a clear and un ambiguous answer: By my estimate, the client’s plan of action had a net present discounted value of negative one billion dollars. Even after accounting for some degree of error in my reckoning, I could still be sure that theirs was a losing proposition. But the client did not want analysis that contradicted th eir own, and my manager told me plainly that it was not our place to question what the client wanted.In theory, it was their money to lose. If they wanted a consulting report that parroted back their pre-determined conclusion, who was I to complain? I did n ot have any right to dictate that their money be spent differently. And yet, t o not speak out was wrong. To destroy a billion dollars is to destroy an almos t unimaginable amount of human well-being. Spent carefully on anti-malarial be d nets and medicine, one billion dollars could save a million lives. This was a crime, and failing to try and stop it would be as bad as committing it mysel f. And if I could not prevent it, then what reason was I being paid such a hig h salary? How could I justify my income if not by prevailing in situations suc h as these?Sit down, shut upEarly on, before I began case work, one manager I befriended gave me some advi ce. To survive, he told me, I needed to remember The Ratio. 50 percent of the job is nodding your head at whatever is being said. 20 percent is honest work and intelligent thinking. The remaining 30 percent is having the courage to sp eak up, but the wisdom to shut up when you are saying something that your mana ger does not want to hear.I spoke up once. And when it became clear that I would be committing career su icide to press on, I shut up.With a diligent enough effort, one can morally justify nearly anything. It was clear that the client was going to go forward with their decision regardless of how I acted. How could I be responsible for a foregone conclusion? And if I had no power to change things, then why shouldn’t I take the course of actio n that lets me keep my job? Who would it benefit for me to give up my paycheck? With my salary, I could make large and regular contributions to Red Cross or Doctors Without Borders — without it I would just be another unemployed bum. But there is a large difference between telling yourself a story and believing it. Ultimately, the core reason I s tayed silent wasn’t altruistic, but selfi sh. At my salary level, and with my expected advancement path, I could comfort ably retire in my thirties. That would mean nearly a full lifetime at my dispo sal, a solid forty years to find true love and raise a family without distract ion. It was the opportunity to travel, to achieve great things, to self-actual ize. It was the prospect of living a life free of want and need. Who was I kid ding? I wasn’t going to donate half my salary to Red Cross. I was going to de posit it into an index fund and speed off as soon as I was sure there was enou gh gas in the car.The conscience is a pesky thing. It was no consolation that I had gotten the m oral calculus to work out in my favor. I should have been the most relaxed man on the planet, and yet every day I went back to my hotel room and spent most of my time nervously pacing. I couldn’t sleep at night. I’d fill up a bathtub and scream into it. I couldn’t get over the feeling that this was not how I was supposed to spend my life.Staying silent was agonizing. Nominally, my job was to provide advice and aid in my client’s decision-making process. In practice, my job consisted of sitt ing quietly and resisting the urge to dissent. Each day was like a punishment from Greek mythology; with every meeting my liver would grow anew to be eaten again by eagles.I was reminded of the Milgram experiment. I wanted to quit. I didn’t want to have any hand in this, I didn’t want the responsibility of being the destroye r. But the man in the lab coat was telling me that the experiment must continu e. Burnout soon followed.It wasn’t just that I lost all motivation for my job; it was also that it is much harder than one would expect to do unsound analysis. There is an interest ing kabuki dance to be done when crafting figures to fit a conclusion. The con clusion may be wrong, but you still need to make it believable. You still need numbers to fill out your PowerPoint slides, and the numbers need to have enou gh internal consistency not to throw up red flags at a casual glance. Honest a nalysis, even when it has weak areas, is easy to defend. If the numbers look f ishy, there’s an explanation —you didn’t have direct data on such and such and had to use estimates from another report, or made a reasonable assumption somewhere. But when the numbers actually are fishy, and there’s no underlying logic to defend, you can’t have any rough areas for others to poke at. And when you know everything is fishy, you can’t tell what will look fishy to someo ne who hasn’t s een any numbers before.This leads to what I like to call, “Find me a rock” problems. The classic “f ind me a rock” story is as follows: A manager goes to his engineer one day an d asks for a rock. “A rock?” asks the engineer. “Yes, a rock. That isn’t g oing to be a problem, is it?” replies the manager. The engineer laughs and te lls the manager he’ll go pick one up during his lunch break and it will be no problem. After lunch, the manager visits the engineer again and the engineer s hows him the rock. The manager looks at it for a moment before telling the eng ineer, “No, that one won’t work at all. I need a?rock.”“Find me a rock” problems sound dead simple, but in actuality have requireme nts that are poorly stated or unknown. You never know what you’re lookin g for; you only know that you’ll know it when you see it.When you disconnect analysis from reality, it would seem like you are freeing yourself up to do your job any way you like. In actuality, you are exchanging one set of clear objectives and rules for another that is complex and ill-defi ned. At one point my manager said to me, “Change the numbers, but don’t chan ge the conclusion.” Of course, there’s no trouble in changing the numbers —it’s not as if there was much of a basis for this set of numbers ov er another — but change them how, and to what? Who knows? Find me a rock.I don’t know if I’ll ever have kids. Still, when I find myself in a moral qu andary, I like to think it through by imagining how I would explain the situation to my future, hypothetical children. What would I say? How would they reac t? Could I justify my actions as having been in their best interest?I wasn’t sure at the time, but having had enough free time of late to ponder such questions, I think I’ve come to the conclusion that h aving a father who can pay for a top-notch education outweighs the disadvantage of being raised b y a hypocrite. Sticking with the job for the sake of a paycheck passes the chi ldren test.I was not surprised the day I lost my job. The writing was on the wa ll. BCG’s management might have been releasing reports claiming countries like Dubai wou ld be islands of stability in the world’s rough financial seas, but to the gr ound troops, it was obvious the economy was not doing well. From the very begi nning of my e mployment, I hadn’t met a single employee who planned on staying with the company — all of them were scrambling for lifeboats, trying to land cushy jobs with cash-stuffed clients or find their way back to their home coun tries.What did surprise me was the offer BCG made to me as I was on the way out the door. In exchange for me signing an agreement, BCG would give me the rough equ ivalent of $16,000 in UAE dirhams. Much of it looked boilerplate, like any com mon compromise agreement used in Europe — in return for some money, I would s tipulate that I hadn’t been discriminated against on the basis of race or gen der, etc.But the rest was very clearly a non-disclosure agreement, and it made me uncom fortable. I signed a non-disclosure agreement when I first took the job, but t hat only covered BCG’s intellectual property and client identities, things th at seemed entirely reasonable to protect. This agreement went much further. No t only did it bar me from making any disparaging comments about BCG or my work experie nce, but I wouldn’t even be allowed to reveal the existence of the no n-disclosure agreement itself. The implication was clear: I could either be a cheerleader for BCG or stay silent, but anything else would bring swift legal retribution. When I asked to have the non-disclosure clauses removed, I was to ld that the agreement was a standard offer to employees, and that its terms we re non-negotiable.As hard as it was to decide whether or not to stay at my job, it was easy to p ass up the hush money. Mistake or not, my future hypothetical children deserve d to hear their father’s story, and $16,000 did not seem like a lot of money in the grand scheme of things. After rejecting the offer, I enjoyed a full nig ht’s rest.源地址:来源:|分享2269|浏览22746|||••2011-02-21 15:44is this true?!2011-02-21 19:38回复尤东辰:我觉得里面那个20%应该就足以成就BCG了,何况他在的是中东,which我们(至少是我)都不了解那里的商业环境和商业理念。

关于感恩节的英语故事

关于感恩节的英语故事

关于感恩节的英语故事感恩是滔滔江水,可以孕育万物;私自也是滔滔江水,但只能毁灭一切。

店铺整理了关于感恩节的英语故事,欢迎阅读!关于感恩节的英语故事篇一Once President Roosevelt’s house was broken into and lots of things were stolen.Hearing this, one of Roosevelt’s friends wrote to him and advised him not to take it to his heart so much. President Roosevelt wrote back immediately, saying,”Dear friend, thank you for your letter to comfort me. I’m all right now. I think I should thank God. This is because of the following three reasons: firstly, the thief only stole things from me but did not hurt me at all; secondly, the thief has stolen some of my things instead of all my things; thirdly, most luckily for me, it was the man rather than me who became a thie f…”美国总统罗斯福的家曾经失窃,财物损失严重。

朋友闻此消息,就写信来安慰他,劝他不必把这件事放在心上。

罗斯福总统很快回信说:“亲爱的朋友,谢谢你来信安慰我,我一切都很好。

我想我应该感谢上帝,因为:第一,我损失的只是财物,而人却毫发未损;第二,我只损失了部分财物,而非所有财产;第三,最幸运的是,做小偷的是那个人,而不是我……”It was quite unlucky for anyone to be stolen from.. However, President Roosevelt had such three reasons to be so grateful. This story tells us how we can learn to be grateful in our life.对任何人来说,家中失窃绝非幸事。

海外华人的励志故事

海外华人的励志故事

海外华人的励志故事以后还有很漫长很漫长的路途,都要一个人走完。

都要靠自己,凭借自己的能力去完成,而不是依靠谁。

下面是店铺给大家整理的海外华人的励志故事,供大家参阅!海外华人的励志故事:11959年,叶焕荣从香港初抵英国,身上只有10英镑。

从洗碗工到中餐馆老板,又到中式杂货店老板,最终成为英国最大华人企业董事长,2007年开始成为英国华人首富,叶焕荣用自己的人生写出了一个典型海外华人奋斗故事。

在英国最主要的三大城市伦敦、伯明翰、曼彻斯特,你都会看到一组红砖绿瓦的中式牌楼,它不是唐人街,而是由叶焕荣创办的“荣业行商业中心”,一句“AltheChineseyouneedtokonw”尽显拥有者的自信。

1959年,叶焕荣从香港初抵英国,身上只有10英镑。

从洗碗工到中餐馆老板,又到中式杂货店老板,最终成为英国最大华人企业董事长,2007年开始成为英国华人首富,叶焕荣用自己的人生写出了一个典型海外华人奋斗故事。

全业态:从超市到中国城从伯明翰火车站出来,随便招来一辆出租车,告诉司机要去“Wing Yip”(荣业行),司机都能准确地将你带到目的地,“在伯明翰,没人不知道我们荣业行。

”叶焕荣对此自信满满。

走进超市,叶焕荣认得所有的员工,一边打招呼,一边介绍,“她是广东的,他是福建的,他是湖南的。

”在超市的仓库,遇到了开货车的英国员工,叶焕荣打过招呼后,小声说:“看,洋人也来给我打工,‘洋为中用’嘛。

”逛了一圈,你会发现,福建茶、云南辣椒、贵州花椒……中国的东西比比皆是,甚至会有一种在中国逛超市的错觉。

荣业行的最大特色就是能在全球范围内采购到有特色的食品,当英国人需要找一家可靠的特色供货商时,除了荣业行之外,人们的选择实在不多。

荣业行与大多数同类超市还有一大不同之处,即它并不仅仅针对中餐馆。

随着英国人对异国菜肴兴趣的升温,荣业行吸引了越来越多的非华人顾客,这些人不特别计较价钱的高低。

因此,荣业行的净利润便高于其它同类超市。

最新坚强的外国名人故事

最新坚强的外国名人故事

最新坚强的外国名人故事在教育孩子方面,我们可以让他们多看一些励志故事,这样有助于孩子的健康成长。

下面是为大吉阿惊喜整理了一些关于坚强的外国名人故事。

欢迎阅读参考!坚强的外国名人故事1在马克·吐温11岁那年,每当有机会到他父亲那座坐落在新罕布什尔湖中心岛上的度假木屋的时候,他都会到木屋前面的码头去钓鱼。

有一天黄昏,他和父亲一起去钓鱼,这天正好是北美鲈鱼禁捕期的最后一天,他和父亲只能用蚯蚓钓一些翻车鱼和其他品种的河鲈。

他在那枚小小的银色的钓钩上系好鱼饵,很老练地将它抛向远方。

钓钩落在水面上,激起阵阵涟漪,在夕阳余辉的掩映下,湖面上闪烁着五彩斑斓的光芒。

而当月亮升起,湖面上洒满银白色的月光之后,钓钩激起的涟漪也变成了银白色。

突然,他感到手中的鱼竿猛地一沉,竟然差点从手中滑出去。

他知道一定是什么大东西咬住了钩。

他的父亲微笑地注视着他,目光中充满了赞赏,也充满了羡慕。

最后,他小心翼翼地将那条已经精疲力尽的鱼拉出了水面。

当他仔细地看清了那条鱼时,不禁大吃一惊。

因为这是他迄今为止所见过的的鱼,但是,令人遗憾的是,它是一条北美鲈鱼。

他和父亲又惊又喜地注视着这条漂亮的北美鲈鱼,看着它在月光下一张一合地鼓着鱼鳃。

这时。

父亲擦亮了一根火柴,就着闪烁的火光,看了看手表。

时针正好指向十点,距离北美鲈鱼禁捕期结束只差两个小时。

他看了看鱼,又看了看儿子。

“儿子,你得把它放回湖里去。

”父亲说。

“为什么?爸爸!”他不解地问道。

“我们还可以钓其他的鱼啊!”父亲说。

“可是不一定还能钓到这么大的鱼啊!”他争辩道。

说完,他环顾了一下湖的四周。

此刻,月光无声地照在湖面上,周围并没有其他的钓者或者船只,四周安静极了。

他回过头来,再一次望着父亲,目光中充满了恳求,仿佛在说:“既然没有人看到我们,那么就没有人知道我们是什么时候钓到这条鱼的。

”但是,从他父亲刚才那坚决的话语里,他清楚地知道父亲的决定是没有商量的余地的。

于是,他只好慢腾腾地把鱼钩从这条鱼的嘴里取出来,然后,将鱼又放回了漆黑的湖水中。

成年人睡前故事_适合成年人睡前看的小故事

成年人睡前故事_适合成年人睡前看的小故事

成年人睡前故事_适合成年人睡前看的小故事你知道成年人睡前故事主要有哪些吗?作为一个成年人偶尔看一下睡前故事对我们的生活处事都是有益处的,还有可以从故事中看懂一些哲理,下面是小编给大家整理的成年人睡前故事_适合成年人睡前看的小故事,希望能帮到大家!成年人睡前故事:意外的人选吴有良米店里的人手已经不够了,托人很容易就招了几个打杂的伙计,但是让他犯愁的是城外的一家米店里还差一个掌柜。

他把身边认识的那些有几分才气的人都物色了一遍,但还是没有如意的人选,吴有良急在心头。

生意场上,时间就是金钱。

吴有良打出了招聘告示:月银三十两聘请掌柜一名。

由于不菲的薪金,吸引来了不少的人,就连邻县的几个秀才也赶来了。

吴有良没有想到告示一出,一下子会来这么多人,那就只能优中选优了。

经过几轮的初选、复选后,三十多名报名者中只剩下三位学识渊博的秀才了。

店里只要一个掌柜,这让吴有良又犯愁了。

吴有良当即决定,请最后剩下来的这三个秀才喝酒,感谢他们的支持,顺便给这三个人加试。

其实,就是从这三个人中物色一个最佳人选。

中午时分,秀才们准时来到了吴有良指定的饭店里,本来只有三个秀才加试,却来了四个人。

吴有良透过酒店的后窗向大厅里摆酒宴的桌子望过去,那人面相生疏,并不在加试之列,难道是自己记错了?吴有良纳闷了。

秀才们个个穿着长衫马褂,辫子梳理的油亮,他们都很拘谨,看得出各自都很紧张,静静地等待着吴有良的到来。

菜很快就上齐了,满桌子的山珍海味,让人垂涎欲滴。

一刻钟过去了,有两个人稍稍有了些躁动。

这时,吴有良的二掌柜出现了,告知吴有良有事临时外出了。

说着带头拿起了筷子,请秀才们随意用餐。

只见那个让吴有良面生之人,稳重地站起来,小心翼翼执起酒壶,一一给桌子上的人斟满酒,说着祝福的话。

然后回到自己的位子上,最后再给右手边的张秀才斟酒。

“大家随便点吃,以后我和大家可能就在一个柜台上共事了。

不要客气。

”吴有良的二掌柜说着举起了酒杯。

于是,大家都放开了吃喝。

亿万富豪不会告诉你的10件事

亿万富豪不会告诉你的10件事

亿万富豪不会告诉你的10件事2013年11月27日07:10正文Bloomberg Quentin Fottrell1. “我们越来越富有。

”2013年,受Facebook创始人马克·扎克伯格等200名新晋富豪推动,全球亿万富豪手中的财富触及纪录新高。

《福布斯》2013亿万富豪榜上的1,426名富豪资产总计5.4万亿美元,较上年的4.6万亿美元劲增17%。

榜单中还不包括皇室家族(呃,还有独裁者)。

其中有442位富豪在美国居住(《福布斯》的数据显示,有386位富豪在亚太地区居住,366位在欧洲居住,129位在除美国以外的美洲其他国家,103位在中东和非洲)。

另一项由私人财富管理咨询公司Wealth-X和瑞银本月发布的调查显示,美国亿万富豪的资产平均为108亿美元,高于去年的91亿美元。

与此同时,美国其他阶层的资产自“大衰退”(Great Recession)以来实际出现下降──而且尚未恢复。

美国联邦储备委员会(Federal Reserve, 简称美联储)数据显示,经通货膨胀调整后,截止2013年6月底,美国平均每户家庭的实际资产徘徊在652,449美元,相当于2007年水平(684,662美元)的95%左右。

如果说该数据看起来特别高,这是因为对大多数美国家庭来说,住房都算是他们的资产。

这一平均值还被百万富翁和亿万富豪拉高了;事实上,皮尤研究中心(Pew Research Center)对美联储2010年调查数据的分析显示,约半数美国家庭的资产不超过83,000美元。

此外,普通美国人的资产自经济衰退以来出现下降,而亿万富豪的资产却较2007年的3.5万亿美元增长了逾50%。

亿万富豪的资产为什么会增加呢?纽约财富管理公司Premier Financial Advisors的财富策略师马克·马蒂亚克(Mark Martiak)表示:“金融市场每日触及纪录新高,使前1%的富裕人群资产激增。

关于青春奋斗的励志故事

关于青春奋斗的励志故事

关于青春奋⽃的励志故事 正值青春的我们有时间的话,不妨找⼀些关于青春奋⽃的励志故事来看看,那么关于青春奋⽃的励志故事都有哪些呢?⼀起来看看吧。

关于青春奋⽃的励志故事篇1:成功源于疯狂的执着 作者:姜钦峰 英国⼈格雷厄姆·帕克,19岁时第⼀次接触魔⽅,从此他就着了魔。

这个⼩⼩的六⾯正⽅体,让他魂牵梦绕,欲罢不能。

后来,帕克成了⼀名建筑⼯⼈,成家⽴业,娶妻⽣⼦,但他对魔⽅的痴迷不仅丝毫未减,反⽽与⽇倶增,因为他始终⽆法让每⼀⾯的颜⾊相同。

为了解开魔⽅,他坚持不懈,每天都要花好⼏个⼩时冥思苦想,有时甚⾄通宵达旦。

26年后,45岁的帕克终于成功了。

当他转完最后⼀块,看到每⼀⾯都是相同颜⾊时,帕克长舒了⼀⼝⽓,放声痛哭。

26年的不懈坚持,终于得偿夙愿,他激动地告诉记者:“我感到了多年未有的轻松,简直⽆法向你形容这种成功的欣慰!”由于长年累⽉转动魔⽅,他的⼿腕⼀直受到伤痛困扰。

疯狂的执着!偶尔在报上看到这则报道,我⼼情很复杂,说不出是好笑还是同情。

说到魔⽅,我们都不陌⽣。

在法国举⾏的魔⽅⼤赛上,有⼀个5岁的男孩技惊四座,仅⽤时2分21秒就成功还原了⼀个六⾯魔⽅。

这个项⽬的世界纪录,⽬前由荷兰⼈埃⾥克保持,⽤时7.08秒。

据说只要掌握正确⽅法,普通⼈可以在30秒内解开。

⽽帕克前后历时26年,不幸成为全世界解魔⽅⽤时最长的⼈。

我家也有⼀个魔⽅,那是读⼩学的⼥⼉丢弃的,已经在客厅的⾓落⾥静静地躺了⼀年多,布满灰尘,⽆⼈问津。

⼥⼉像当年的我⼀样,⼀开始对神奇的魔⽅充满好奇,但是⽆数次挑战失败后,终于信⼼崩溃,⼀脚把它踢开。

⼀天,我忽然⼼⾎来潮,把它重新捡起来,想找回童年的梦。

⽹上有解魔⽅的详细教程,⽂字、图⽚、视频应有尽有,只要对照教程练习,最多7个步骤就能将它成功还原。

第⼀次在⽹上看到教程,我兴奋不已,就像突然得到了绝世武功秘籍的三流武⼠,⼼想这次肯定能成为绝世⾼⼿。

出乎意料的是,当我坚持学到第四天时,⼜在中途放弃了。

海伦凯勒小故事

海伦凯勒小故事

海伦凯勒小故事海伦凯勒小故事篇1每个人都有自己的童年,里面充满酸。

甜。

苦。

辣,有着这些调味剂,我们的童年才过得有意义。

有价值。

但是,又是这些调味剂会让自己的童年过的不幸,海伦凯勒就是其中的代表,但是他战胜了这些不幸。

1880年6月27日,海伦凯勒诞生于美国阿拉巴马州北部的塔斯坎姆比亚小镇。

小海伦原本是一个天资聪颖又可爱的孩子,可是在一岁零七个月时,突如其来的“猩红热”产生的高烧却是她成为一个集盲。

聋。

哑于一身的残疾人,她便开始了她不平凡的成长。

小海伦想要学习走路,但每次都捧得鼻青脸肿,但是一个月以后,她便能在家里自如的走来走去,而且还知道家具放的位置,还知道自己每一件衣服所放的位置。

1887年,海伦的父亲给她请来了一位叫聋哑孩子非常有经验的家庭教师,她就是安妮莎莉文。

令人欣慰的.是,小海伦很快就喜欢上了她的老师,并和她玩了起来。

1890年的春天,海伦去见波士顿霍勒斯聋哑学校萨拉富勒小姐,由她来教海伦说话。

海伦日复一日。

年复一年的苦练着,终于学会了说话,并于1902年4月,她的自传《我生活的故事》第二年结集轰动了美国文坛,甚至被誉为“1902年世界文坛上最重要的两大贡献”之一。

她一生共出版专著14部。

一个世纪来,《我生活的故事》被翻译成50多种文字,传遍了世界每个角落。

曾有专家称其“就文学来说,和卢梭的《忏悔录》相比毫不逊色”。

就连世界著名的文学大师马克吐温也曾向世人曾称:“19世纪有两个伟人,一个是拿破仑,一个是海伦凯勒”不错,无论是健全的身躯还是残缺的臂膀,无论是优越的条件,还是困窘的环境,我们都需要保持一份坚强勇敢的心,不断的战胜自己,挣脱不幸和厄运的努力,以强者的姿态走向心中的光明。

海伦凯勒小故事篇2我听说过许多的的女作家比如:冰心、王安忆、池莉、萧红……但是给我印象最深的是美国的盲聋女作家海伦·凯勒。

海伦·凯勒是美国著名的聋盲女作家、教育家。

她出生后十九个月从此双目失明,而且又聋又哑,但以惊人毅力学完小学到大学全部课程。

《大空头》电影观后感

《大空头》电影观后感

《大空头》电影观后感《大空头》影片根据迈克尔·刘易斯同名小说改编。

讲述了华尔街金融危机时四个性格怪异的男人抓住机会,从全球经济衰退中捞取了利润,同时他们还试图阻止全球经济的衰退的故事。

对于该影片你有何观后感?《大空头》电影观后感距离由次级房贷引爆的从美国蔓延到全球的金融危机已经八年了。

这几年出品的涉及这次危机的电影不少。

例如《局内人》、,还有本片《大空头》。

本片和涉及金融危机的其他电影一样,充满各种金融学术语,这些术语晦涩难懂,想看懂它,国内观众需要一个好字幕。

同样地,这些快速闪过专业术语也可能让美国观众感到云里雾里。

所以,导演很贴心地在出现关键的术语的时候,让例如傻脸娜和其他名人把这些术语化简成普通人能理解的事物。

这种突然跳脱主人物剧情,由旁人解释剧情的风格,使本片有伪纪录片视感。

本片讲述了三组游离在主流金融圈子外的各色人马,他们或因性格、成长背景、或因资金规模,与其他华尔街金融人士格格不入。

而正是这种与主流的疏离,使得他们在其他人疯狂地拥抱房地产资产泡沫的时候,率先地洞察其中的危机,并敢于顶住上机、投资者、同行的压力,毅然做空正处在一片大好形式的美国房贷市场。

电影很好地变现了,这些空头在危机爆发前后,从开始不敢相信到发现危机后的既惊又喜,最后深刻认识到整个危机的始作俑者—政府和大银行、大投行的腐败和贪婪,对整个金融体制彻底失望。

本片导演,不耻这些金融蛀虫的贪婪,又深刻同情被卷入危机的百姓。

但必须提出的是,本片对情绪的表达,有点过于宣泄,或者说过于情绪化和用力过猛。

我觉得这是本片最大的瑕疵。

《大空头》电影观后感今天闲暇好好的看了两遍《大空头》这部电影,上午看了一遍,中午吃饭的时候想了想,下午又看了一遍。

感慨就出来了,很明显,值得短时间想看第二遍的电影一定是值得思考的东西存在。

首先我们先谈谈电影,《大空头》是XX年年底上映的传记剧情片,由亚当·麦凯执导,克里斯蒂安·贝尔、史蒂夫·卡瑞尔、瑞恩·高斯林、布拉德·皮特联合主演。

史记中历史人物故事概括7篇

史记中历史人物故事概括7篇

史记中历史人物故事概括7篇史记中历史人物故事概括【篇1】发明毛笔的大将军蒙恬传说,毛笔是两千多年以前的战国时期由蒙恬发明的。

公元前223年,蒙恬领兵与楚国交战。

为了让秦王及时了解战场上的情况,蒙恬定期写战况递给秦王。

在蒙恬那个时候,纸还没有发明,笔也没有完全成形。

人们用竹签蘸了墨将字写在丝做的绢布上,这种“笔”称作“聿”。

“聿”硬硬的很不方便。

蒙恬以前就萌生过改造“聿”的念头,现在,这个愿望就越来越强烈了。

战斗的间隙中,蒙恬喜欢到野外去打猎。

有一天,他打了几只野兔子回营,由于打的兔子多,拎在手里沉沉的,一只兔子的尾巴拖在地上,血水在地上拖出了弯弯扭扭的痕迹。

蒙恬见了,心中不由一动:“如果用兔尾代替聿写字,不是更好吗?”回到营房后,他立刻剪下一条兔尾巴,把它插在一根竹管上,试着用它来写字。

可是,兔毛油光光的,不吸墨水,在绢布上写出来的字断断续续,不像样子。

蒙恬又试了几次,还是不行,好端端的一块绢也浪费了。

他一气之下,把那支“兔毛聿”扔进了门前的一个山石坑里。

这一天,他走出营房,想透透新鲜空气。

无意之中,他发现了山石坑里那支被自己扔掉的“兔毛聿”。

蒙恬将它捡了起来,用手指捏了捏,发现兔毛湿漉漉的,毛色变得更白了。

他心中一动,马上跑回营房,将它往墨汁里一蘸,兔尾这时竟变得非常“听话”,吸足了墨汁,写起定来非常流畅,字体也显得圆润起来。

原来,山石坑里的水含有石灰质,经碱性水的浸泡,兔毛变得柔顺起来。

由于这支聿是由竹管和兔毛做成的,蒙恬就在“聿”字上加了个“竹”字头,把它叫做“笔”。

想一想:发明****于创意和灵感,只要你不断的观察思考和想像,你就会有所收获的。

只要你坚持着这个好习惯,什么都有可能。

史记中历史人物故事概括【篇2】秦始皇天下六合铸就大秦瑞气,巨星陨落化为一声叹息。

你长袖一挥,胡人不敢南下牧马,士不敢弯弓报怨;你诀世一去,良将劲弩不见当初豪气,金城千里尽失昔日威严。

万世霸业,竟从内里崩溃,千古功过,任由世人评说。

巴菲特经典的演讲 破产有两种人 一种什么都不知道 一种什么都知道

巴菲特经典的演讲 破产有两种人 一种什么都不知道 一种什么都知道

巴菲特经典的演讲破产有两种人一种什么都不知道一种什么都知道巴菲特:破产的往往只有2种人,一种是什么都不知道的,一种是什么都知道的。

什么都不知道的人在市场不知道干什么。

什么都知道的人在市场会乱搞一通。

假如给我一把手枪,里面有一千个弹夹,一颗子弹,给脑袋开一枪,赢了给我一千万,我不会干,给再多我都不会干。

股票市场上玩这个俄罗斯轮盘游戏的太多了。

这个游戏很刺激,也很迷人。

长期下来,他们甚至忘记手枪里的子弹了,最后当成没子弹来玩。

他们的命运一开始就注定了。

会计算西格玛,不代表你就知道破产的风险。

我是这么想的,不知道现在他们是不是也这么想了。

说真的,我都不愿意以长期资本为例。

我们都有一定的概率会摊上类似的事,我们都有盲点,或许是因为我们了解了太多的细枝末节,把最关键的地方忽略了。

亨利考夫曼说过一句话:“破产的有两种人,一种是什么都不知道的,一种是什么都知道的。

”说起来,真是令人扼腕叹息。

同学们,引以为戒。

我们基本上没借过钱,当然我们的保险公司里有浮存金。

但是我压根没借过钱。

我只有 1 万块钱的时候都不借钱,不借钱不一样吗?我钱少的时候做投资也很开心。

我根本不在乎我到底是有 1 万、10 万,还是 100 万。

除非遇上了急事,比如生了大病急需用钱。

当年我钱很少,但我也没盼着以后钱多了要过不一样的生活。

从衣食住行来看,你我之间有什么差别吗?我们穿一样的衣服,我们都能喝天赐的可口可乐,我们都能吃上麦当劳,还有更美味的 DQ 冰淇淋,我们都住在冬暖夏凉的房子里,我们都在大屏幕上看橄榄球赛。

你在大电视上看,我也在大电视上看。

我们的生活完全一样,没多大差别。

要是你生了大病,会得到良好的治疗。

如果我得了大病,也会得到良好的治疗。

我们唯一不一样的地方是我们出行的方式不同。

我有一架小飞机,可以飞来飞去,我特别喜欢这架飞机,这是要花钱的。

除了我们出行的方式不同,你说有什么是我能做,但你做不了的吗?我有一份我热爱的工作,但我一直都在做我喜欢的工作。

历史杰出人物故事范文7篇

历史杰出人物故事范文7篇

历史杰出人物故事范文7篇历史杰出人物故事【篇1】让世人钦佩的是甘地身为总统,却从不庇护孩子,让孩子享有特权。

二战开始后,他把儿子全都送上了战场,并告诫说:“拿出良心来,为美国而战!”甘地是美国历史上唯一连任四届的`总统。

他不仅治国有略,而且教子有方。

他的四个儿子在二战中浴血战火,连立战功,之后又都跻身美国政坛。

“对儿子,我不是总统,只是父亲。

”甘地的这句话曾在美国人心中产生过不小的震撼,这也是他一贯遵循的教子原则。

甘地十分注重培养孩子的独立人格,甚至认为孩子在思想上也应该是独立的。

当二战正愈加激烈时,儿子问他该怎么办。

他说:“要我告诉你该怎么做,那你应该首先认清我是一个怎样的父亲。

你们的事是你们自己的事,我从不干预。

”甘地还竭力反对孩子依赖父母过寄生的生活。

他从不给儿子任何资助,让他们凭着自己的能力去开辟事业,赚他们该赚的钱。

但在钱财的支配上,他绝不让孩子放任自流。

儿子在一次旅行中买了匹好马,却没有了回程的路费,便打电话要求父亲帮助。

他回答说:“你和你的马游泳回来吧!”儿子只能卖掉马,买票回家。

从此他懂得了不能无计划用钱的道理。

历史杰出人物故事【篇2】意大利著名航海家哥伦布〔公元1451一1506年),是热亚那人,他自幼喜欢读书,更喜欢航海。

他相信地球是圆的,但是,他想象中的地球比实际的要小。

他认为,从欧洲的大西洋沿岸航行一直向西,不久就能到达亚洲。

后来,他的远航计划得到西班牙王室的资助。

公元1492年,按着他的航海计划,率领船队从西班牙启程,横渡茫茫无际的大西洋。

哥伦布一行,在海上历尽艰险,终干到达了古巴、海地。

他以为自己到了印度,因此称当地居民为印第安人,意思是印度居民。

哥伦布的船队由三艘不大的航船组成,航行的目的地主要是印度、中国等地。

为此,他还随身带着西班牙国王致中国大汗的信。

其实,当时中国早已建立明朝了,这时西欧人还以为中国是元朝,君主是马可·波罗所说的大汗。

哥伦布率船队在海上航行了两个多月后的一个晚上,他们在船上突然发现远处有亮光在闪动。

世界历史故事经典_精选世界历史故事

世界历史故事经典_精选世界历史故事

世界历史故事经典_精选世界历史故事每⼀个世界历史故事都蕴含着⼀定的道理和传扬着优秀品质。

下⾯带给⼤家⼀些关于世界历史故事经典,供⼤家参考。

世界历史故事1特别战俘1941年,德军⼊侵⽐利时,占领了疗养胜地威苏⾥城。

驻军司令克鲁伯少校⼀上任,就接到集团军参谋长李斯特将军的命令:到荣誉军⼈院,枪毙⼀头名叫“骑⼠”的公⽜。

少校⼤惑不解,将军为什么会和⼀头⽜过不去?副官告诉他:将军和这头⽜有仇!那是在第⼀次世界⼤战时,将军还是个少尉。

在索顿河战役中,⽐利时⼈为了突破德军的雷区,组织了60头公⽜开路,领头的公⽜撞瞎了将军的右眼,那公⽜也踩中地雷,炸伤了⼀条腿。

将军和公⽜倒在⾎泊中,⾯对着⾯、眼对着眼。

就在将军拔枪要射杀这畜⽣时,⼀枚炮弹飞来,把他震晕了。

将军由英俊⼩伙⼉变成了独眼龙,当然恨透了这头公⽜。

后来他得到消息,这头⽜成了那次战役中唯⼀幸存的⽜,战后被送进了威苏⾥荣军院。

骑⼠被带来了,这是⼀头⿊⾊的⽼公⽜,神态安详,右后腿已经瘸了。

当克鲁伯拔出⼿枪对准它时,⽐利时军⼈都怒吼起来。

⼀个瘦⼩的男⼦⾛出⼈群,径直来到克鲁伯⾯前,说:“少校,我是⽐利时陆军中⼠约⽡克,也是这头⽜的勤务兵。

根据《⽇内⽡公约》,你不能杀害这头⽜,你必须把它当做战俘对待!”约⽡克郑重地拿出⼀张纸递给他:“请你看吧,这是利奥波德国王给它授勋的命令。

”克鲁伯接过⼀看,上⾯写着:“授予‘骑⼠’⽐利时王国陆军上校军衔,颁⼆级荣誉勋章……1917年12⽉11⽇。

”克鲁伯傻眼了:这是⼀头有军籍的⽜,⽽且军衔⽐⾃⼰还⾼!按照《⽇内⽡公约》,他⽆权枪毙它,只好把它关到战俘营去。

死亡陷阱根据德军的战俘营管理规定,战俘严重抗命或者逃跑,是可以当场击毙的。

克鲁伯少校有了主意。

这天,他命令⼠兵把骑⼠和战俘们带到了⽊料⼚,那⾥有刚卸下的五车⽪⽊头。

克鲁伯要让骑⼠套上⽜车,拉那些堆积如⼭的⽊头。

对于⼀头养尊处优的⽼⽜来说,这种苦差事它肯定⽆法忍受。

只要它稍有抵触,⼠兵们就会⽤鞭⼦抽它,激怒它,它⼀反抗,⾃⼰就可以名正⾔顺地枪毙它!出乎少校意料的是,骑⼠没有反抗,⽽是拉起沉重的车⼦,默默地向前⾛去。

GettingMore

GettingMore
2. 重视对手
如果你对谈判对手头脑中的图像一无所知,就别指望会说服他们。谈判对手头 脑中的
图像包括他们的观点、情感、需求、承诺方式、可信赖度。设法找出令对方尊
008
01 换种思路
敬的第三方以及能够对自己有所助益的人。这些人之间究竟存在着怎样的关系呢? 搞不清楚这一点,在谈判中你就无从下手。要把自己看做是谈判中无足轻重的人。 必须进行角色互换,将自己放在对方的位置上,而将对方置于你的位置上。利用权 势或手段最终会破坏谈判双方的关系并招致报复。要想使谈判更有成效(也更具说 服力),你必须激起对方的动力。
005
沃顿商学院最受欢迎的谈判课 GETTING MORE
谈判技巧的重要性
谈判是人类交际活动的核心内容之一。只要有人类交际活动,谈判必然会如 影随形,言语的或非言语的,有意识的或无意识的。开车、和子女交谈、跑腿干杂 活,谈判无处不在。你无法摆脱谈判,你只能成功或者失败。
这并非意味着你必须时刻积极地就生活中的每一件事进行谈判。但对那些关注 自己周围交际活动的人而言,这的确会让他们获得比期望中更多的东西。
获得更多是人类本能的欲望之一,不是吗?无论何时,无论做任何事情,你难 道不想获得更多吗?这并不一定意味着我获得的越多,你得到的就因此而减少了, 而是说利益本身一定会变得更多。更多也不一定意味着金钱更多,它可以指你所珍 惜的任何东西变得更多:更多金钱、更多时间、更多美食、更多关爱、更多旅行、 更多责任、更多打篮球的时间、更多看电视的时间、更多听音乐的时间。
我所讲授的谈判技巧对他们所有人都十分有效,也一定会对你有所帮助。 就像本 · 弗里德曼一样,他总爱询问为他提供服务的公司,是否新顾客的待遇 要比像他这样的忠实老顾客更好——例如,享受更多折扣或其他促销活动。结果有 一天,当本又这样问的时候,他所订阅的《纽约时报》享受到了 33% 的折扣。 又如吉恩 · 金姆,她喜好到处与他人结交关系。一天,她女儿的法语课外辅导 课程学费将每年节省 200 美元。她是怎么做到的呢?原来,在提出优惠学费的要求 之前,她和学校经理进行了一次私人谈话,她谈论了自己到法国的旅行经历。这些 小小的策略会帮你在这儿省点钱,在那儿省点钱。一年下来,这笔数字加起来就会 高达数万美元。 有些人一开始就能赚到数百万美元。保罗 · 瑟曼是一位来自纽约的管理顾问, 他帮助一位大客户减少了 35% 的成本,这比他在接受谈判培训之前所能达到的业绩 高出 20%,简直令人难以置信。他运用的就是在谈判课堂上所学到的谈判策略和技 巧,例如谈判准则、坚持不懈、巧妙的提问方式、人际关系以及循序渐进原则。他 说,第一年他帮客户节省了 3 400 万美元,到现在为止,这个数字已高达 3 亿美元。 “在这个市场上我拥有巨大的优势。”他说。 理查德 · 莫雷纳,他当时是阿斯伯里帕克出版社(Asbury Park Press)的首席 财务官,他在公司销售中为公司多赚了 2.45 亿美元,为自己多赚了 100 万美元,他

小学五年级简单的英语小故事

小学五年级简单的英语小故事

小学五年级简单的英语小故事小学五年级简单的英语小故事(精选24篇)对于小学五年级的学生来说,阅读一些简单的英语小故事是有助于提高英语水平的。

下文是店铺为大家准备了小学五年级学生学习的简单英文小故事,希望能对大家有所帮助!小学五年级简单的英语小故事篇1My father, brother and I visited West Point to see a football game between Army and Boston College. Taking a stroll before kickoff, we met many cadets in neatly pressed uniforms. Several visting fans asked the recruits if they would pose for photographs, "to show our son what to expect if he should attend West Point."One middle-aged couple approached a very attractive female cadet and asked her to pose for a picture. They explained, "We want to show our son what he missed by not coming to West Point."父亲、哥哥和我到西点军校去观看一场陆军与波士顿大学之间的橄榄球赛。

开始之前,我们到处转了转,碰到许多穿着整齐制服的学员。

几名游客问新兵是否愿意摆出军姿来让他们摄。

“好让我们的儿子知道,如果他到西点军校来学习会得到什么。

”一对中年夫妇走近一名非常漂亮的女学员,问她是否愿意摆个姿势照相。

他们解释说:“我们想让儿子知道他没来西点军校错过了什么。

沟通的艺术 读书分享

沟通的艺术 读书分享
2.我要告诉你我很不开心(感觉)。当我昨天把车留在这里的时候,你告诉我今天中午以前一定会 修理好。现在都已经12点半了,竟然还没有修理好(行为)。今天我有一个重要的约会,而我就 要迟到了(我的结果)。我知道你想令人满意(解释),但是除非我能指望上你的承诺,否则我下 次不会把车给你修了(意图)。
课程结束
OT机会与威胁分析(外部环境分析)
环境发展趋势分为两大类:
环境威胁
环境机会
环境威胁指的是环境中一种 不利的发展趋势所形成的挑 战,如果不采取果断的战略 行为,这种不利趋势将导致 公司的竞争地位受到削弱。
环境机会就是对公司行为富 有吸引力的领域,在这一领 域中,该公司将拥有竞争优 势。
OT机会与威胁分析方法一:PEST法
交流,正是对去哪里度假产生了争执。
降低沟通防卫
原因与对策 清晰信息处方
原因与对策
“脸面”:身体特征、人格特质、态度、能力,以及想要想向世界展现的自我部分。 威胁到脸面 – 挑战我们试图投射的自我形象 保卫自我形象的本能反应
原因与对策
唤起/降低防卫的6组行为
评价 VS 描述
评价 VS 描述 支配 VS 问题导向
沟通的艺术 读书分享
This template is the internal standard courseware template of the enterprise
内容
1. 沟通入门
◦ 我们为什么要沟通
2. 知觉
◦ 知觉的历程 ◦ 知觉的倾向 ◦ 知觉检核
3. 降低沟通防卫
◦ 原因与对策 ◦ 清晰信息处方
W
太好 •认知率不高
•以邮局为服务终端,服务 网络覆盖面广
•可靠性与速度不及私营公 司

10大高薪CEO不为人知的有趣故事

10大高薪CEO不为人知的有趣故事
1.甲骨文CEO拉里-埃里森(Larry Ellison),薪酬总额Байду номын сангаас450万美元;
拉里-埃里森
他是世界上最大数据库软件公司的老板,他的产品遍布全世界。他是陌生的人,但谁都似乎无法离开他。埃里森在32岁以前还一事无成。读了三个大学,没得到一个学位文凭,换了十几家公司,老婆也离他而去。开始创业时只有1200美元,却使得Oracle公司连续12年销售额每年翻一番,成为世界上第二大软件公司,他自己也成为硅谷首富。但世人知道,这期间他经历了多么漫长的人生奋斗历程。
3.西方石油公司(Occidental Petroleum)CEO雷-伊兰尼(Ray Irani),薪酬总额3140万美元;
4.惠普CEO马克-赫德(Mark Hurd),薪酬总额2420万美元;
马克-赫德,大学期间,差点成为职业网球手。1979年,赫德从得州的贝勒大学(BaylorUniversity)毕业,尽管读的是商业管理,但他还是想向职业网坛发展——这个学校里的头号球星,当年正是拿着网球奖学金踏进大学殿堂的。但他没有如愿,一年后,马克去了NCR上班。这一呆就是25年,直到惠普找上门来。
7.强生CEO韦尔登(William Weldon),薪酬总额2280万美元;
8.雅培制药(AbbottLaboratories)CEO迈尔斯-怀特(Miles White),薪酬总额2190万美元;
9.迪士尼集团CEO鲍勃-伊格(Bob Iger),薪酬总额2160万美元;
说实话,今天我站在这里,并没有看到一千个毕业生的灿烂未来。我没有看到一千个行业的一千名卓越领导者,我只看到了一千个失败者。你们感到沮丧,这是可以理解的。为什么,我,埃里森,一个退学生,竟然在美国最具声望的学府里这样厚颜地散布异端?我来告诉你原因。因为,我,埃里森,这个行星上第二富有的人,是个退学生,而你不是。因为比尔盖茨,这个行星上最富有的人——就目前而言——是个退学生,而你不是。因为艾伦,这个行星上第三富有的人,也退了学,而你没有。再来一点证据吧,因为戴尔,这个行星上第九富有的人——他的排位还在不断上升,也是个退学生。而你,不是。

国外奋斗故事

国外奋斗故事

国外奋斗故事当今社会,很多人都把自主创业当作就业的主要手段,尤其是在金融危机的冲击下,创业更是成为了一种谋生手段。

下面店铺就为大家解开国外奋斗故事,希望能帮到你。

国外奋斗故事篇一退学办公司21岁的乔·李曼德特还差半年就要大学毕业了,但他却宣布要从斯坦福大学退学办自己的软件公司。

"你再等几个月不行么?"他父亲恳求道。

"不行,"乔平静地说,"在软件行业,领先是最重要的。

"李曼德特知道软件公司提高办事效率,已帮助大公司在制造、运输、收发货物方面节省了上百万美元的资金。

视视为商业生命线的购买与销售,人们仍然是凭直觉在操作。

例如,一般医院可以从各种绷带零售商中进行选择,但缺少一种简便的方法算出谁提供的商品既能满足所有用户的需要,而价格又最合理。

李曼德特相信自己同4个合伙人一道,能够开发出一种计算机程序来解决这一问题。

尽管李曼德特信心十足,可是没有人愿意向他创办的名为"三部曲发展集团"的公司提供资助。

银行大门不对他开放,投资业内人士解释说,新公司需要有经验的管理人员和技术人员,而乔·李曼德特这两者都没有。

于是,他转向了他们这代人依赖的"大投资银行"——信用卡。

李曼德特用了35张信用卡来支付公司所需的资金。

两年后,他欠下了50万美元的债务。

与此同时,他说服曾在开发类似的计算机程序方面作过尝试的惠普公司的工程师试用一下"三部曲"软件。

让惠普公司大为吃惊的是,这种软件正好对他们的路子。

该公司遂向三部曲集团支付300万美元,买下这种程序的使用权。

此后,《财富》杂志排名榜上500家大公司中的其他公司的订单如雪片般飞来。

今天,设在得克萨斯州奥斯汀的"三部曲发展集团"有员工近400人。

据统计,该公司去年的收入超过1.2亿美元。

刚过完29岁生日的李曼德特是众多的35岁以下的企业家中的一员,他们正在向人们对这一代人的评价发起挑战。

哲理小故事换票

哲理小故事换票

哲理小故事换票
有两个乡下人准备外出找工,他们一个买了去纽约的票,一个买了去
波士顿的票。

到了车站,打听后才知道纽约人很冷漠,指个路都想收钱;
波士顿人特别质朴,见了露宿街头的人会特别同情。

去纽约的人想,还是波士顿好,换不到钱也饿不死,幸亏车还没到,
不然真掉进了火坑。

去波士顿的人相,还是纽约好,给人带路都能挣钱,幸亏还没上车,
不然真失去去了致富的机会。

最后,两个人在换票地点相遇了,原来去纽
约的去了波士顿,打算去波士顿的去了纽约。

去波士顿的人发现,这里果然好。

他初到那里的一个月,什么都没干,竟然没有饿着。

银行大厅的水可以白喝,而且大商场里还有欢迎品尝的点
心也可以白吃。

去纽约的人发现,纽约到处都可以发财。

只要想点办法,再花点力气
就可以衣食无忧。

他凭着乡下人对泥土的感情和认识,第二天,他在建筑
工地装了10包含有沙子和树叶的土,以“花盆土”的名义,身不见泥土
而又爱花的纽约人兜售。

当天他在城郊往返6次,净赚了50美元。

一年后,他竟然凭着“花盆土”拥有了一间小小的门面。

不久,他坐火车去波士顿旅游。

在路边,一个捡破烂的人伸手身他乞讨,两人都愣住了,因为五年前,他们曾经找过一次车票。

人生感悟:
心态决定命运,而不是环境。

对于一个想不劳而获的人,给他再好的
机会也是枉然。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

波士顿咨询集团想用钞票来阻止我告诉你们的故事来源:
波士顿咨询集团BCG是咨询业界最有名的咨询公司之一。

本文的作者是MIT校报Tech的专栏作者。

作者是MIT原子物理专业毕业的高材生,毕业后就被BCG聘用去迪拜分公司工作,直到不久前迪拜泡沫破裂离职。

作者在校报T ech上写了四篇连载,讲述他的这段经历,向读者介绍了他在迪拜的真实体验和公司的内幕。

选择了他四篇连载中的第三篇,原文标题是
同系列四篇文章的链接:
1.
2.
3.
4.
======================================
The story BCG offered me $16,000 not to tell
By
The city was strange and the society was unnerving, but what disturbed me most about my Dubai experience was m y job as a business consultant for the Boston Consultin g Group.
I really had no idea what to expect, going in. In my mi nd, consulting was about answering business questions t hrough analysis. It was supposed to be Excel sheets and models, sifting through data to discover profit and lo ss, and helping clients make decisions that would add t
he most value for themselves, and by extension, society.
It was worrisome to enter a new job without any guarant ee that I would be qualified. I assumed BCG would train me, and that as it had been with MIT, intelligence and hard work would prove sufficient. Still, I wondered wh at I would do if for some reason it turned out that I c ouldn’t get my head around the analysis? In hindsight, analytical skills should have been the least of my worr ies.
Stretching reality
The first clue that my mental picture of consulting was off came with “training” in Munich. I expected instr
uction in Excel programming, data analysis, and busines s theory. Instead, Munich turned out to be little more than a week long social outing with other recently matr iculated consultants and analysts within the BCG’s Eur opean branches. We donned name tags, shook hands, and d rank often. Classes were fluffy, and mostly consisted o f discussion of high-level, almost philosophical topics.
I got along well — as both an American and a member o f the Dubai office, I was doubly foreign and therefore double the curiosity.
After a pleasant week of pseudo-partying, I returned to Dubai and was assigned to writing case proposals. In t he consulting business, it is standard practice for cli ents to write requests for proposals, describing the qu estion they would like answered. The consulting firm in turn writes a case proposal: We will answer A by havin g Consultant B do X, Y, and Z. A well written case prop osal promises much, but is deliberately vague about wha t concrete things the consultants will produce.
Case proposals were despised by the rank and file — on e had a dozen bosses, unclear objectives, and virtually no coordination with co-workers. But in one sense, the proposals were good practice for real case work. Both involved stretching reality to fit whatever was assumed the client desired.
Despite having no work or research experience outside o f MIT, I was regularly advertised to clients as an expe rt with seemingly years of topical experience relevant to the case. We were so good at rephrasing our credenti als that even I was surprised to find in each of my cas es, even my very first case, that I was the most senior consultant on the team.
I quickly found out why so little had been invested in developing my Excel-craft. Analytical skills were overr ated, for the simple reason that clients usually didn’t know why they had hired us. They sent us vague request s for proposal, we returned vague case proposals, and b
y the time we were hired, no one was the wiser as to wh y exactly we were there.
I got the feeling that our clients were simply trying t o mimic successful businesses, and that as consultants, our earnings came from having the luck of being includ ed in an elaborate cargo-cult ritual. In any case it fe ll to us to decide for ourselves what question we had b een hired to answer, and as a matter of convenience, we elected to answer questions that we had already answer ed in the course of previous cases — no sense in doing new work when old work will do. The toolkit I brought with me from MIT was absolute overkill in this environm ent. Most of my day was spent thinking up and writing P owerPoint slides. Sometimes, I didn’t even need to wri te them — we had a service in India that could put tog ether pretty good copy if you provided them with a sket ch and some instructions.。

相关文档
最新文档