企业成本管理外文翻译文献
企业成本控制外文翻译文献
企业成本控制外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)译文：在价值链的成本控制下减少费用和获得更多的利润摘要：根据基于价值链的成本管理理念和基于价值的重要因素是必要的。
首先，必须有足够的资源，必须创造了有利的价值投资，同时还需要基于客户价值活动链，以确定他们的成本管理优势的价值链。
其次，消耗的资源必须尽量减少，使最小的运营成本价值链和确保成本优势是基于最大商业价值或利润，这是一种成本控制系统内部整个视图的创建和供应的具实践，它也是一种成本控制制度基于价值链，包括足够的控制和必要的资源投资价值的观点，创建和保持消费的资源到合理的水平，具有价值的观点主要对象的第一个因素是构造有利的价值链，从创造顾客价值开始；第二个因素是加强有利的价值链，从供应或生产客户价值开始。
因此它是一个新型的理念，去探索成本控制从整个视图的创建和供应的商品更盈利企业获得可持续的竞争优势。
关键词：成本控制，价值链，收益，支出，收入，成本会计1、介绍根据价值链理论，企业的目的是创造最大的顾客价值；和企业的竞争优势在于尽可能提供尽可能多的价值给他们的客户，作为低成本可能的。
这要求企业必须首先考虑他们是否能为顾客创造价值，和然后考虑在很长一段时间内如何创造它。
然而，竞争一直以“商品”（或“产品”）作为最直接的载体，因此，传统的成本控制方法主要集中在对“产品”和生产流程的过程。
很显然，这不能解决企业的问题，企业是否或如何能为客户创造价值。
换句话说，这至少不能从根本上解决它。
因此，企业必须首先投入足够的资源，以便他们能够创建客户值取向，然后提供它以最少的资源费用。
所以在整个视图中对价值创造和提供整体的观点来控制成本，它可以为客户提供完美的动力和操作运行机制运行成本的控制，也可以从根本上彻底克服了传统的成本控制方法的缺点，解决了无法控制的创造和供应不足的真正价值。
基于此，本文试图从创作的整体观讨论成本控制提供价值并探讨实现良性循环的策略，也就是说，“创造价值投资成本供应价值创造价值”。
毕业论文(设计)外文文献翻译及原文
金融体制、融资约束与投资——来自OECD的实证分析R．SemenovDepartment of Economics，University of Nijmegen，Nijmegen（荷兰内梅亨大学，经济学院）这篇论文考查了OECD的11个国家中现金流量对企业投资的影响.我们发现不同国家之间投资对企业内部可获取资金的敏感性具有显著差异,并且银企之间具有明显的紧密关系的国家的敏感性比银企之间具有公平关系的国家的低.同时，我们发现融资约束与整体金融发展指标不存在关系.我们的结论与资本市场信息和激励问题对企业投资具有重要作用这种观点一致，并且紧密的银企关系会减少这些问题从而增加企业获取外部融资的渠道。
一、引言各个国家的企业在显著不同的金融体制下运行。
金融发展水平的差别(例如，相对GDP的信用额度和相对GDP的相应股票市场的资本化程度），在所有者和管理者关系、企业和债权人的模式中，企业控制的市场活动水平可以很好地被记录.在完美资本市场,对于具有正的净现值投资机会的企业将一直获得资金。
然而，经济理论表明市场摩擦，诸如信息不对称和激励问题会使获得外部资本更加昂贵，并且具有盈利投资机会的企业不一定能够获取所需资本.这表明融资要素，例如内部产生资金数量、新债务和权益的可得性，共同决定了企业的投资决策.现今已经有大量考查外部资金可得性对投资决策的影响的实证资料（可参考，例如Fazzari（1998）、 Hoshi(1991)、 Chapman（1996）、Samuel(1998））.大多数研究结果表明金融变量例如现金流量有助于解释企业的投资水平。
这项研究结果解释表明企业投资受限于外部资金的可得性。
很多模型强调运行正常的金融中介和金融市场有助于改善信息不对称和交易成本，减缓不对称问题,从而促使储蓄资金投着长期和高回报的项目,并且提高资源的有效配置（参看Levine（1997)的评论文章）。
因而我们预期用于更加发达的金融体制的国家的企业将更容易获得外部融资.几位学者已经指出建立企业和金融中介机构可进一步缓解金融市场摩擦。
外文文献翻译---中小型企业财务管理中存在的问题及其对策
广东工业大学华立学院本科毕业设计（论文）外文参考文献译文及原文系部会计学系专业会计学年级 08级班级名称 2008级会计（7）班学号 14010807030学生姓名吴智聪2012年 2 月 9 日目录1. 外文译文 (1)2. 外文原文 (5)中小型企业财务管理中存在的问题及其对策中小型企业在中国经济发展中发挥着重要的作用。
统计数据表明，在工商行政管理局登记在册的企业中，中小型企业占了99%，产值和利润分别占总额的60%和40%。
此外，中小型企业所提供了75％的城镇就业机会。
可见其为中国的稳定和经济繁荣作出了重要贡献。
虽然中小型企业在国民经济中占有重要地位，对中国经济发展与社会稳定具有很重大的意义。
但是，中小型企业发展的主要障碍是缺乏有效的财务管理。
本文分析了当前中小型企业财务管理中存在的问题，并就改善中小型企业财务管理提出了相应对策。
1.1 中小型企业的财务管理现状自从21世纪以来，中国的中小型企业的蓬勃发展，在经济增长和社会发展中发挥着非常重要的作用。
据财政部统计数据，直到2005年底，中小型企业总数已超过1000万，占中国企业总数的99%。
中小型企业提供了75％的城镇就业机会，工业企业的总产值、销售收入、实现的利得税和出口额分别占总数的60%、57%、40%和60%，上缴的税收已经接近了国家税收总额的一半。
中小型企业承载着超过75%的技术革新和超过65％的专利发明，他们以其灵活的经营机制和积极创新活动，为经济发展提供了增长的最根本动力。
近年来，中国中小企业的消亡率将近70%，大约有30%的中小型企业存在赤字。
中小型企业应该如何建立现代企业制度，加强财务管理，并科学地进行资本运作以谋求自身的健康发展，是我们密切关注的一个问题。
1.2 中小型企业财务管理中存在的问题⑴财务管理理念滞后，而且方法保守中小型企业由于管理者自身知识水平的限制，使得企业的管理能力和管理质量较低。
他们的管理思想已经不适合现代企业，并且大多数企业领导人缺乏财务管理的理论和方法，忽视了企业资本运作的作用。
外文翻译--战略成本管理的供应链采购管理的前景(节选)
中文2969字外文翻译原文：Strategic Cost Management in the Supply Chain:A Purchasing andSupply Management PerspectiveIn the course of this study, it became clear that effective strategic cost management has both strategic and tactical aspects that must be well executed in order to deliver results. The strategic framework and tactical elements of cost management as they affect PSM are shown , which also shows the soft and hard results of effective cost management as related to PSM. The actual processes in which cross-functional teams engage to support strategic cost management include many tactical elements. In most organizations studied, the strategic cost management process occurs as an integral part of the new product development process or the strategic sourcing process. It is not a ―stand-alone activity,‖ but rather central part of supplier selection and supply base management. Some of the processes and tools that are part of the strategic cost management process are listed in Table 2, and presented in more depth in the body of the report. A cross-disciplinary team of two or more individuals, including PSM, was the norm for carrying out strategic cost management in the five core organizations studied. Often, the cost management activities were part of another, larger process, such as a strategic sourcing event, a new product development process, or part of an on- going continuous improvement effort. In exploring Figure 1 in detail, it is clear that the cross-functional team that works on strategic cost management has numerous high-level issues that it must consider. First, the price and feature needs of the ultimate customer must be heavily weighted, or the result will be a product that customers cannot afford, that does not meet their needs, or both.Organizational Support at all Levels: While PSM is held to a high level of accountability for strategic cost management and delivering bottom-line savings, PSMcannot be successful without extensive support from others throughout the organization. First and foremost, top management support is critical. It sets the tone for the attitude that everyone in the organization has toward strategic cost management. Through the business unit and functional metrics, top management determines the nature and extent of cost management focus as an organizational priority. Based on this, PSM needs the support of other functional areas cooperating teams that have a primary or second goal of managing supplier costs. The participants on cross-functional teams need to be held accountable for the identification of opportunities and delivery of results. PSM also needs specific support from cost management specialists, who are assigned to support PSM and cross- functional teams in supplier cost analysis. These individuals may be part of PSM or part of finance. The critical requirement is that they have the charter and the qualifications to effectively support supplier cost analysis and management. Supplier cost management must be viewed as one of, if not the most important aspect of their jobs. This focus is critical because supplier cost analysis is often specialized and time consuming. PSM and cross-functional teams need to know that there are internal experts upon whom they can call to support their supplier cost management efforts. Without such support, the analysis may be too complex and time consuming to be done as part of PSM’s or the cross-functional team’s regular activities.Supplier Cost Management is a Good Investment: The suggested approach for dedicating resources to supplier cost management may seem cost prohibitive. However, the organizations studied unanimously agree that they receive extremely high returns on their investments in supplier cost management efforts. The money spent on supplier should-cost analysis, supplier development, and other tools and approaches pays for itself many times over in terms of reducing costs and bottom-line prices paid to suppliers. For large Fortune 500 companies, successful strategic cost management may mean the addition of dedicated personnel to focus on supplier cost management. For smaller organizations which might not have as great an on-going need, or as great an asset base, successful strategic cost management may mean diverting resources from PSM and/or finance, and retraining one or more people tobecome internal experts on some of the cost management and analysis tools mentioned in this study.Support for Strategic Cost Management Theory: As mentioned in the brief review of the literature below, strategic cost management theory embodies understanding and managing the organization’s supply chain, the cost drivers and the customer value proposition. It is a matter of simultaneously understanding and managing these elements in relation to each other. The organizations investigated do an excellent job of understanding and managing their internal cost drivers and supplier-facing cost drivers. Two of the organizations that have a strong management focus on customer relationships also do an excellent job of managing the customer-facing cost drivers. It is not clear from the study how well these organizations understand the customers’ value proposition and translate that across internal functions and to their suppliers. Except in the case of LCP, and to some extent Deere, the translation mechanism is indirect, through one or more functions that may have direct customer contact. This represents an opportunity for potential improvement. Related to this, as mentioned in the section on supply chain perspective, most of the organizations studied do not generally have a seamless view of the supply chain from customer to supplier; the customer view and supplier view are still managed separately in different organizations, with some interface in the middle. Such coordination would be a complex undertaking, and might require a change in team structure. The organization that comes closest to embodying a true supply chain perspective is LCP, with its product supply structure. While the argument could be made that it is more important for LCP to be close to its customers because it is a consumer products firm, all types of customers are becoming more demanding (Fawcett and Magnan, 2001). LCP’s product supply structure has a Product Supply Vice President who reports into the Business Unit President. Also reporting to the VP of Product Supply are PSM, engineering, manufacturing, customer service/logistics, and finance. Deere has a similar structure, although there is a mix of direct and indirect reporting relationships.The customer information comes to the team through a secondary source, oftenfiltered through the eyes of marketing, sales, or a customer relationship manager. The corporate objectives regarding strategic cost management and cost savings goals must also be considered in terms of meeting the objectives of the team and the business unit or units that the team supports. Next, each organization utilized cost management specialists, for whom all or a major part of their jobs was to support cost analysis, help develop models, and ensure integrity in the data and the analysis results. In some cases, these individuals reported to PSM; in others, they reported to corporate or business unit finance. The key commonality across cost management specialists in these organizations was the expertise, credibility and charter to support supplier cost management. Even with the first three direct inputs, a fourth is needed: a reward an measurement system that supports cost management. The extent to which such a system exists is a function of the corporation’s cost consciou sness culture. Is everyone in the organization held accountable for cost management? Is it part of their performance reviews, annual goal setting, and overall expectations? The stronger the cost-consciousness culture, the greater the support for the team and the commitment to its results. In the center of Figure 1, the cross-functional team engages in activities designed to reduce the organization’s cost, such as identifying cost drivers and changing processes using a total cost of ownership approach, engaging in on-line reverse auctions, or working with suppliers on development. The way that the organizations studied use these processes is detailed in the body of the report. Based on the strategic cost management processes, they aim to achieve a better supply base, defined as one that has a lower cost (sometimes only a lower price), and performs as well or better than it did before the strategic cost management process. The process should also support customer satisfaction by resulting in the same or lower prices for the same or better quality and service. This should in turn lead to measurable, bottom line savings, which should translate into higher profit, higher economic value-added for the firm, and higher earnings per share. In general, when PSM thinks about achieving results, the focus is still on bottom line cost savings rather than how its performance is reflected in the overall corporation’s results.Characteristics of Companies with Effective Supply Chain Strategic CostManagement Approaches: The key characteristics that organizations with effective strategic cost management systems should display are shown in Table 3. Table 3 was developed as a composite ideal of the best characteristics of the core supply chain organizations studied. It is not representative of any one organization. There are specific attributes related to way the organization understands and manages the relationship with the customer, its supplier, and related to their own internal organization. The key organizational characteristics have been divided into cultural/organizational issues, measurement issues, and information/communication issues.Internal requirements/characteristics–Both the customer-facing and supplier-facing characteristics stem from inside the organization. The internal culture and organizational structure create the framework for effective supply chain cost management. Internally, an effective cost-management culture is characterized by top management support for cost management and a high level of cost and value consciousness throughout the company. In addition to dedicated resources to support supply chain cost management, cross-functional teams are used to identify and implement cost management approaches. Rather than an afterthought, cost management is an integral part of all key supplier processes. The right type of reward and measurement systems is also critical to reinforce the cost management culture. It is critical that the organizations measure what they want to achieve, and the metrics are aligned throughout the organization, reflecting cost goals as well as customer value and supplier performance goals. Supply chain performance metrics and results must be published and receive high visibility throughout the organization. This requires excellent information systems and communication. Part of this communication includes awareness throughout the organization of customer needs and the organization’s value proposition in serving the customer.Customer-facing knowledge– Supply chain management is all about meeting the needs of customers better than the competition does. In terms of the organization’s culture, the company needs to be customer centric, valuing its customers and working with them to meet their needs while improving the efficiency and effectiveness of thesupply chain. From a measurement standpoint, the organization needs to understand the needs of the end customer as well as market trends, and respond to these proactively. From an information and communication perspective, it is critical that the c ustomers’ needs and the organization’s plans for meeting those needs be communicated throughout the organization. This allows everyone in the organization to align his or her efforts around the customer.Supplier facing knowledge/characteristics—Effective supply chain strategic cost management relies heavily on suppliers. Culturally, this means a continuous improvement focus on working with suppliers, including early supplier involvement. It also means supporting supplier’s continuous improvement with res ources and training. From a measurement and reward standpoint, the organization must properly segment its supply base to use the appropriate types of supplier relationships and cost management techniques. It also needs to measure supplier performance, and reward the suppliers who perform well. Clearly communicating expectations and needs to suppliers is essential. The organizations studied in this research excel in the third column of Table 3: supplier-facing knowledge. The segment their supply bases, have dedicated supplier cost management resources, emphasize continuous improvement, and in many cases develop the suppliers by providing resources to support continuous improvement. They reward their top suppliers by sharing cost savings or giving them more business. They are working on improving communications and early supplier involvement. One strong recommendation is that they invest more resources in supplier training. In general, their first tier suppliers do not have as well- developed approaches to supplier cost management. Since these core organizations would prefer not to work on supplier cost management beyond their first tier suppliers, the first tier suppliers would likely be much more effective if they improved their cost management systems, and worked more closely with their suppliers.Source: Lisa M.Ellram,2002. ―Strategic Cost Management In the supply chain: Apurchasing and supply management perspective‖ .pp47-69.译文：战略成本管理的供应链:采购管理的前景在研究的过程中，战略成本管理的战略和战术方面都必须执行得好才能产生明显的效果。
中小企业成本管理研究外文翻译中文文献
中小企业成本管理研究外文翻译中文文献Cost Management in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Research on Foreign LiteratureAbstractAs the backbone of the economy, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in creating jobs, stimulating innovation, and driving economic growth. However, they often face challenges in managing costs effectively. This article examines and analyzes foreign literature on cost management in SMEs. It explores various cost management techniques, such as activity-based costing, budgeting, and cost control, and highlights the importance of cost management in enhancing the competitiveness and sustainability of SMEs. The findings provide valuable insights for SMEs to optimize their cost management practices and achieve long-term success in the competitive business environment.1. Introduction1.1 BackgroundCost management is an essential aspect of business operations, as it directly impacts the profitability and financial stability of a company. In SMEs, which typically have limited resources and face intense competition, effective cost management is even more crucial.1.2 ObjectivesThe primary objective of this research is to examine the foreign literature on cost management in SMEs and identify best practices and techniques thatcan be applied in the Chinese context. By understanding the experiences and strategies of SMEs in other countries, Chinese SMEs can learn from their successes and avoid potential pitfalls in cost management.2. Cost Management Techniques2.1 Activity-Based Costing (ABC)Activity-Based Costing is a cost allocation method that assigns costs to specific activities or cost objects based on their utilization of resources. This technique provides a more accurate understanding of the cost drivers in a company, enabling SMEs to allocate resources more effectively and identify areas for cost reduction.2.2 BudgetingBudgeting is a fundamental cost management tool that allows SMEs to plan and control their financial resources. By setting realistic and achievable budgets, SMEs can monitor their expenses, forecast future costs, and make informed decisions regarding resource allocation.2.3 Cost ControlCost control involves monitoring and regulating expenses to ensure that they remain within planned limits. SMEs can employ various cost control techniques, such as implementing cost-saving measures, negotiating favorable contracts with suppliers, and leveraging technology to streamline operations and reduce overhead costs.3. Importance of Cost Management in SMEs3.1 Enhanced CompetitivenessCost management enables SMEs to offer competitive prices without compromising on quality. By optimizing their cost structure, SMEs can improve their profit margins and gain a competitive edge in the market.3.2 Resource OptimizationEffective cost management allows SMEs to allocate their limited resources strategically. By identifying unnecessary costs and reallocating funds to key areas, SMEs can optimize their production processes and invest in critical areas such as research and development.3.3 Financial StabilityCost management helps SMEs maintain a stable financial position by minimizing the risk of running into cash flow problems or accumulating excessive debt. By controlling costs and ensuring efficient resource allocation, SMEs can safeguard their financial health and sustain long-term growth.4. ConclusionThis research on foreign literature emphasizes the significance of cost management in SMEs and provides valuable insights into proven techniques and strategies. By implementing effective cost management practices, SMEs can optimize their operational efficiency, enhance competitiveness, and achieve long-term success in an increasingly competitive business environment. This research serves as a guide for Chinese SMEs to improve their cost management practices and overcome challenges effectively. By integrating foreign experiences with localized strategies, SMEs can navigatethe complexities of cost management and position themselves for sustainable growth.。
所有权的总成本：一个关键的概念,战略成本管理的决定【外文翻译】
外文文献翻译译文一、外文原文原文：Total cost of ownership: a key concept in strategic costmanagement decisionsStrategic cost management is not a new concept in theory. In application, however, it presents major opportunities for decision-making improvements for most organizations. As described by Shank and Govindarajan. strategic cost management takes a broad view of the organization's costs, both internal and external in such a way as to enhance competitive advantage.Much of the literature on strategic cost management has approached it from a financial or accounting perspective. This is logical, since those functions of the organization often have fiduciary responsibility for cost control. In many organizations, however, it is the supply management area, also referred to as purchasing, procurement, sourcing. or a number of other names, that has the ultimate responsibility for controlling the bulk of the organization's expenditures. A recent study indicates that purchased items make up an average of 63.5% of total costs for manufacturing firms and 25% for nonmanufacturers. Such expenditures are directly related to the organization's costs, but many discussions of strategic cost management concepts focus primarily on control of manufacturing costs, such as labor and machine time. In most organizations, the costs of purchased materials and services far outweigh internal manufacturing costs.This article has several purposes. It begins with an exploration of the concept of total cost of ownership (TCO) and why it is an increasingly viable model for use in acquisition decisions today. Second, a review of the TCO literature as it applies to purchasing decisions is presented. Next, the relationship between strategic cost management and TCO analysis in purchasing decisions is explored.Case studies of eleven organizations that apply TCO concepts to their purchasing decisions are used to overview how and where TCO models are currently being applied. Based on those data and previous research, evidence is presented as to why TCO concepts are not more widely implemented. Managerial/strategic suggestions are presented for overcoming barriers to applying TCO in purchasing and for linking TCO to strategic cost management concepts. The paper closes with suggestions for future research.TCO is a purchasing tool and philosophy aimed at understanding the relevant cost of buying a particular good or service from a particular supplier. References to TCO and related concepts, such as life cycle cost analysis, have been in the literature for some time, but its practical application has been somewhat limited. TCO is an important tool to support strategic cost management. It is a complex approach that requires the buying firm to determine which costs it considers most relevant or significant in the acquisition, possession, use, and subsequent disposition of a good or service. In addition to the price paid for the item, TCO may include the costs incurred by purchasing for order placement, research and qualification of suppliers, transportation, receiving, inspection, rejection, storage, and disposal.Review of the literatureOne use of TCO analysis is to support the supplier selection and evaluation decision. Traditional approaches include selecting and retaining a supplier based on price alone, or based primarily on price. or qualitatively evaluating the supplier's performance using categorical or weighted point/matrix approaches. While the latter arc preferred to a "price only" focus, such approaches tend to deemphasize the costs associated with all aspects of a supplier's performance and generally disregard internal costs. Examination of such costs is a strength of the TCO approach.TCO AnalysisSelection and evaluation concepts closely aligned with TCO include life-cycle costing, zero-base pricing, all-in-costs, cost-based supplier performance evaluation. and the cost-ratio method, None of these approaches have received significant, widespread support in the literature or in practice for a variety of reasons, primarilybecause of their complexity and the lack of general understanding of the concepts.Life-cycle costing focuses primarily on capital or fixed assets," The aim is to go beyond the purchase price of an asset, to determine how much it actually costs the organization to use, maintain, and dispose of that asset during its lifetime. Pre transaction costs tend to be de-emphasized. This approach is congruent with TCO but is only a subset of TCO activity. TCO is applicable to virtually every type of purchase and includes the pre purchase costs associated with a particular supplier.Zero-base pricing and cost-based supplier performance evaluation both advocate understanding suppliers' total costs. In contrast to TCO, zero-base pricing focuses heavily on the supplier's pricing structure and cost of doing business. Cost-based supplier performance evaluation has a narrower scope than TCO, focusing primarily on the external costs of doing business with a supplier rather than considering both the internal and external costs.More recently, several articles have focused specifically on TCO. Handfield and Pannesi explore understanding TCO specifically for components. They note that TCO components issues are directly related to where the component is within its life cycle, which may not be related to the overall product life cycle.Carr and Ittner overview TCO approaches used by several organizations. The models they present are all modified versions of the cost-ratio method. Using that method, an organization usually identifies several key factors or activities that increase costs. Factors such as those resulting from poor quality and late delivery are added to the total purchase price. Dividing these total costs by the total purchase price yields an "index." This index is then used as a multiple for future bids/prices from the supplier to evaluate the true "total cost of ownership" of doing business with that supplier. Ellram and Siferd developed a conceptual framework for costs to be included in TCO analysis, Ellram used case studies of organizations that have used formal TCO analysis to develop a framework for TCO implementation. Ellram also developed a taxonomy for classifying TCO models based on the type of buy, also known as "buy class." and according to whether the TCO model is standard or unique. Bennett presents a TCO approach used by Compumotor, a manufacturer of flowcontrol equipment. Compumotor links TCO to its activity-based costing system to provide an integrated approach to TCO analysis.Approaches similar to TCO in purchasing have been advocated in the logistics literature and strategic management literature. These approaches are a means of understanding total costs throughout the supply chain in order to provide direct support for strategic cost management efforts.Lack of understanding of TCO can be very costly to the firm. Poor decisions will likely result, hurting the firm's overall competitiveness, profitability, pricing decisions, and product mix strategies.Theoretical RootsEconomists have long acknowledged the importance of going beyond price to encompass the transaction costs in purchasing from external sources. Economists have focused on transaction cost analysis primarily from a make-or-buy perspective, considering vertical integration versus buying goods or services in the market. Transaction costs analysis is also the foundation of TCO analysis.While TCO analysis can be applied to the analysis of the make-or-buy decision, it should also be applied after an organization has determined that it will use a third party (buy) rather than use an internal source (make). Transaction costs can vary significantly among suppliers and can be an important decision factor.Previous literature on TCO analysis defined transaction costs as costs incurred prior to actual sale; associated with the sale, including price; and after the sale has occurred, including disposal. From this perspective, transaction cost analysis in the economics literature provides the theoretical basis for further examining TCO analysis. TCO analysis is the tool and philosophy to support the theory of transaction cost analysis.When TCO Is Strategic Cost ManagementIt can be argued that TCO is only truly strategic cost management when it occurs on a strategic level, as in helping to Improve the processes in the organization or the supply chain. In order for TCO analysis to qualify as strategic cost management, cost considerations must span the boundaries of the organization to include costs bothexternal and internal to the organization. By definition, all applications of TCO analysis do this by specifically considering the effects of the supplier's performance, and the performance of purchased goods or services, on the organization's total costs.Unlike traditional cost reduction and cost savings techniques, which focus internally. All TCO analysis is supportive of strategic cost management. That is because all TCO analysis considers the broad effect of purchase decisions on the organization's costs, as well as the implications of purchase decisions on other cost parameters.How TCO Models Support Strategic Cost ManagementAccording to Shank and Govindarajan, three key themes are blended in strategic cost management: value chain analysis, strategic positioning analysis, and cost driver analysis. Each is discussed briefly below, as related to TCO analysis.The value chain analysis concept is quite similar to the supply chain management concept discussed in the purchasing and logistics literature. Simply stated, the value chain framework requires that an organization consider all activities in which it engages that are required to produce the product or serve ice and provide it to the ultimate consumer. This focus is external, considering all activities, which add value, from the earliest raw material sources through the production process to the ultimate end-user. With few exceptions. purchasing cost analysis has tended toward an internal focus.TCO clearly supports the value chain approach by considering the total cost of dealing with suppliers, such as internal and external costs of supplier selection, assessment, management and related factors, internal costs of application/use of the purchased item, internal and external costs associated with disposal or failure of the product or service in appllcationor in the field. An illustration of the value chain approach is an auto manufacturer that moved to application of just-in-time concepts, reducing its own inventory. This reduction, however, merely shifted more inventory and uncertainty to the suppliers. The suppliers costs actually increased more than the auto manufacturer's costs decreased.By using TCO concepts to analyze this purchase situation, this expensive decision could have been avoided.The second concept of strategic cost management, strategic positioning, examines the role of cost management in the organization. Shank and Govindarajan state that a cost management emphasis will vary depending on whether the firm pursues a product differentiation or cost leadership strategy. They argue that a cost leadership strategy would place a greater emphasis on cost management and reporting of items such as product costs, whereas a product differentiation strategy would focus more on marketing costs. Because the cost of externally procured items tends to be a major component of product costs, one might expect that the application of TCO concepts in purchasing would be more prevalent in firms that pursue a cost leadership strategy. Analyzing the relationship between an organization's positioning strategy and the type of TCO analysis chosen was beyond the scope of this research, but it does provide an interesting issue for future research.The third element of strategic cost management is cost driver analysis: understanding what factors actually affect cost behavior. Traditionally, costs have been allocated based on production volume. As Shank and Govindarajan point out, however, volume is generally not the best way to explain cost behavior. High-volume products tend to receive a greater burden than the effort required would support, and low-volume products tend to receive a lower cost allocation than justified by effort. TCO analysis inherently realizes that supplier costs are not driven solely by volume. Rather, they are driven by all aspects of the supplier's performance, including such activities as accurate invoicing, timely delivery, and product or service performance as well as response to inquiries.Understanding cost drivers and properly allocating costs to the activities that create those costs is a key premise of activity-based cost management (ABCM). Thus, both TCO and strategic cost management are based on the same underlying premise as ABCM.In addition. TCO an analysis is congruent and supportive of the major elements of strategic cost management. The TCO philosophy should be just one element of an organization's strategic cost management approach. As indicated by the magnitude of purchase expenditures, TCO analysis is an important element of strategic costmanagement. It is critical, however, that purchasing organizations that perform TCO share the results with the rest of the organization. Such shared knowledge will help support the firm's overall cost management goals, whether or not the goals of a particular TCO analysis are in themselves strategic in nature.Gaps in the LiteratureBased on a review of the literature, TCO analysis is a potentially important approach for improving the validity of purchasing decisions. The literature does not reveal the characteristics of purchasing decisions that TCO supports in terms of type of buy (capital, raw materials, services, and so on) and the importance of decisions supported. Also not evident in the literature is why a concept as important as TCO analysis is not used by more organizations to support purchasing decisions. The barriers to TCO implementation and how they can he overcome are not articulated in the literature.which also does not tie TCO analysis to the firm's overall strategic cost management efforts. The next section discusses the method used to explore these issues.Method of studyThis research was designed to explore the uses of TCO modeling in purchasing among a select sample of organizations based in North America, The research was aimed at developing a qualitative rather than quantitative in-depth understanding of TCO practices. Thus, a case study method was selected."To address gaps identified in the literature, case study participants were asked the open-ended questions shown in Appendix I. Additional questions related to demographic data, accounting systems, and TCO analysis structure, which are not directly pertinent to this research, also are included in the Appendix. During the process of exploring TCO practices, a relationship was uncovered between TCO and strategic cost management in the organizations studied. This paper focuses on the strategic cost management implications of the TCO research project.Case study research is not based on a random sampling; rather, it generally involves a focused approach to site and sample selection in order to gain access to the type of phenomenon being studied. In order to target organizations of potentialinterest, the researchers formed an advisory board to support this project and to help identify and provide introductions to potential organizations. In addition, the researchers contacted many purchasing professionals and academics and conducted an extensive review of the literature.Source: Ellram,Siferd,1998.“total cost of ownership: a key concept in strategic cost management decisions”. Journal of business logistics. vol.19, pp.55-84.二、翻译文章译文：所有权的总成本：一个关键的概念，战略成本管理的决定战略成本管理在理论上不是一个新概念。
财务管理外文文献及翻译
附录A财务管理和财务分析作为财务学科中应用工具。
本书的写作目的在于交流基本的财务管理和财务分析。
本书用于那些有能力的财务初学者了解财务决策和企业如何做出财务决策。
通过对本书的学习，你将了解我们是如何理解财务的。
我们所说的财务决策作为公司所做决策的一部分，不是一个被分离出来的功能。
财务决策的做出协调了企业会计部、市场部和生产部。
无论企业的形式和规模如何，财务原理和财务工具均适用。
就像对小规模的私营企业而言存在如何筹资的问题，大企业面临所有权和经营权分离时出现的代理问题。
不管公司的规模和形式是如何的，公司财务管理的基本原理是一样的。
例如，无论是独资企业做出的决策还是大企业做出的决策，今天一美元的价值都高于未来一美元的价值。
我们所说的财务原理和财务工具适用于全球的企业，不仅限于美国的企业。
虽然国家习惯和法律可能与国家的原则理论存在着不同，但财务管理用到的工具是一样的。
例如，在评估是否要买一个特殊设备的价值时，你需要评估企业未来现金流的发生（设备成本和支出的时间和设备的不确定性），这个企业位于美国、英国还是在其他的地方?此外，我们相信拥有强大的财务原理和数学相关工具的依据对于你了解如何做出投资和财务决策十分必要。
但是建立这种依据比不费力。
我们试图帮你建立这种依据的途径是通过直觉提出财务原理和财务理论。
而不是原理和证据。
例如，我们引导你通过数字和真实例子对资本结构原理产生直觉，而不是利用公式和证据。
再者我们试图帮助你通过仔细的逐步的例子和大量数据处理财务工具。
财务管理和财务分析分为7个部分。
前两个部分（第一部分和第二部分）涉及到基础部分，它包括财务管理、估价原则的目标以及风险和回报之间的关系。
财务决策涉及到第三、四、五部分的内容，我们提出了长期投资管理（通常被称为资本预算）的长期来源、管理和资金管理工作。
第六部分涉及到财务报表分析，它包括财务比率的分析，盈利分析和现金流量分析。
最后一个部分（第七部分）涉及到一些专业论题：国际财务管理，金融结构性金融交易（例如资产证券化），项目融资，设备租赁贷款和财务规划策略。
外文文献及翻译-物料管理系统(MMS)
外文文献及翻译-物料管理系统(MMS)本文介绍了物料管理系统(MMS)的相关外文文献及翻译。
1. 文献标题： A review of material management system in construction industry文献标题： A review of material management system in construction industry- 作者： John Smith作者： John Smith- 出版年份： 2015出版年份： 2015该文献综述了建筑行业中物料管理系统的现状和发展趋势。
介绍了物料管理系统在建筑项目中的重要性和作用，并提出了一些物料管理系统的关键要素。
该文献还讨论了物料管理系统在提高项目效率和降低成本方面的影响。
2. 文献标题： Implementation of an integrated material management system for manufacturing industry文献标题：Implementation of an integrated material management system for manufacturing industry- 作者： Jane Chen作者： Jane Chen- 出版年份： 2018出版年份： 2018该文献介绍了制造业中一种集成化物料管理系统的实施方法。
文章详细说明了该系统的架构和功能，并介绍了该系统在物料采购、库存管理和供应链协调方面的优势。
研究还分析了实施该系统对制造业企业的影响和效益。
3. 文献标题： Material management system for construction projects using RFID technology文献标题： Material management system for construction projects using RFID technology- 作者： Peter Wang作者： Peter Wang- 出版年份： 2016出版年份： 2016该文献介绍了一种利用射频识别(RFID)技术的物料管理系统，用于建筑项目中的物料追踪和管理。
工程管理专业外文文献翻译(中英文)【精选文档】
xxxxxx 大学本科毕业设计外文翻译Project Cost Control: the Way it Works项目成本控制：它的工作方式学院（系）: xxxxxxxxxxxx专业: xxxxxxxx学生姓名: xxxxx学号： xxxxxxxxxx指导教师： xxxxxx评阅教师：完成日期：xxxx大学项目成本控制：它的工作方式在最近的一次咨询任务中，我们意识到对于整个项目成本控制体系是如何设置和应用的,仍有一些缺乏理解。
所以我们决定描述它是如何工作的.理论上，项目成本控制不是很难跟随。
首先，建立一组参考基线。
然后，随着工作的深入，监控工作,分析研究结果,预测最终结果并比较参考基准。
如果最终的结果不令人满意，那么你要对正在进行的工作进行必要的调整，并在合适的时间间隔重复。
如果最终的结果确实不符合基线计划，你可能不得不改变计划.更有可能的是，会 (或已经) 有范围变更来改变参考基线，这意味着每次出现这种情况你必须改变基线计划。
但在实践中，项目成本控制要困难得多，通过项目数量无法控制成本也证明了这一点。
正如我们将看到的，它还需要大量的工作，我们不妨从一开始启用它。
所以，要跟随项目成本控制在整个项目的生命周期.同时，我们会利用这一机会来指出几个重要文件的适当的地方。
其中包括商业案例，请求（资本)拨款（执行），工作包和工作分解结构，项目章程（或摘要),项目预算或成本计划、挣值和成本基线。
所有这些有助于提高这个组织的有效地控制项目成本的能力。
业务用例和应用程序（执行）的资金重要的是要注意，当负责的管理者对于项目应如何通过项目生命周期展开有很好的理解时,项目成本控制才是最有效的。
这意味着他们在主要阶段的关键决策点之间行使职责。
他们还必须识别项目风险管理的重要性，至少可以确定并计划阻止最明显的潜在风险事件。
在项目的概念阶段•每个项目始于确定的机会或需要的人.通常是有着重要性和影响力的人,如果项目继续,这个人往往成为项目的赞助。
成本控制外文翻译
成本控制外文翻译企业成本控制外文翻译有英文原文和翻译英文：36863字符中文：10000多字企业的特点与内部控制重大弱点对萨班斯法案第404评估Stephen Bryan威克森林大学巴布科克管理学院Steven Lilien纽约州立大学巴鲁学院摘要著名的萨班斯法案（SOX）要求公司评估其内部控制的财务报告并且报告存在的重大错误，这些重大错误石油公公会计监督委员会规定的。
基于早期的证据，我们发现，那些有重大错误的企业，和他们相对应的产业同行相比，他们的决策者团队更小更糟。
我们还发现，那些有重大错误的企业，平均上，具有较高的投资和风险系数，也就是这些公司拥有市场提供给他们的更高的折扣。
从宏观经济学的角度看，那些报告有重大错误的公司的市场总价值只有S＆P500强企业的市场价值的1.28％。
最后，虽然我们将不良股票归纳在重大错误的报告中，通过一个很小的间隔，这些是无不足道的。
建立小企业，在对于所有企业来说建立企业都是非常高成本的环境下，貌似是非常不公平的。
萨班斯法案是否会带来企业效益，通过更好地运作，降低资金成本，或其他方式还有待观察。
此外，如果这些利益实现，是否应该，实际上是立法的，是一个有争议的问题的。
虽然有些人坚持认为萨班斯法案会减少盈余管理，公司继续通过盈余管理盈余预估。
此外，虽然美国证券交易委员会的注册G号，也立法颁布萨班斯法案的一部分，使系统“通过试算收入的”有管理的披露更为透明，它不能行使收益控制权的和解进程，企业使用这两种设置，满足分析师估计。
Characteristics of Firms with Material Weaknesses in Internal Control: An Assessment of Section 404 of Sarbanes OxleyStephen BryanBabcock Graduate School of ManagementWake Forest UniversitySteven LilienBaruch CollegeCity University of New YorkAbstract The legislation known as Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) requires firms to assess their internal controls over financial reporting and to report material weaknesses, as defined by the Public Accounting Oversight Board. Based upon early evidence, we find that firms with materialweaknesses are, on average, both smaller and worse performers than their matched industry counterparts. We also find that firms with material weaknesses, on average, have higher betas, suggesting a higher discount by the market for these firms. From a macro-economic view, the total market value of firms with reported material weaknesses is only 1.28% of the market value of the S&P 500 firms. Finally, although we document negative stock returns on the date of the announcement of the material weakness, over a narrow interval, the returns are insignificant. Identifying small firms that collectively constitute a minor portion of the economy at a very high cost to all public firms seems out of balance. Whether SOX will yield benefits to corporations through better operations, reduced cost of capital, or other means remains to be seen. Moreover, if these benefits materialize, whether they should, in effect, be legislated is a matter of debate. Although some maintain that SOX will reduce earnings management, firms continue to manage earnings through pro forma earnings. Furthermore, although t he SEC’s Reg G, also enacted as part of SOX legislation, makes the “managed disclosure system” through pro forma earnings more transparent, it fails to exercise control over the reconciliation process that firms use both to set and to meet analyst earnings estimate.。
企业管理外文文献及翻译
LNTU---Acc附录A论企业经营业绩评价系统的构建企业作为盈利性组织，其目标是追求经济效益，企业的经济效益集中体现在经营业绩上。
业绩，也称为效绩，绩效、成效等，反映的是人们从事某一活动所取得的成绩或成果，经营业绩是企业在一定时期内利用其有限的资源从事经营活动取得的成果，表现为企业经营效益和经营者业绩两方面。
《辞海》中对“评价”的解释是：“评定货物的价格、还价。
今也指衡量人物或事物的价值。
”价格是价值的货币表现，评价实际上是一个判定价值的过程，就如《现代汉语词典》中的解释：“评价”是“评定价值高低、评定的价值”，管理活动中的评价是指根据确定的目标来测定对象系统的属性，并将这种属性变为客观定量的价值或者主观效用的行为。
评价作为判定人或事物价值的一种观念性活动，包括确定评价目的、选定评价标准(或评价参照系统)，获取评价信息，形成价值判断四个环节。
企业经营业绩评价是指运用科学，规范的评价方法，采用特定的指标体系，对照统一的评价标准，按照一定的程序，进行定量及定性分析，对企业一定经营期间的经营效益和经营者业绩作出真实、客观、公正的综合评判。
它是评价理论方法在经济领域的具体应用，它是在会计学和财务管理的基础上，运用计量经济学原理和现代分析技术而建立起来的剖析企业经营过程，真实反映企业现实经济状况，预测企业未来发展前景的一门科学。
建立和推行企业经营业绩评价制度，科学的评判企业经营成果，有助于正确引导企业经营行为，帮助企业寻找经营差距及产生的原因，提高经济效益。
同时，也为各有关部门对企业实施间接管理，加强宏观调控、制定经济政策和考核企业经营管理者业绩提供依据。
企业经营业绩评价系统的构建与实施必须建立在一定的理论基础之上，符合一定的原则，才能发挥其良好的功能，从而使业绩评价“客观”、“公平”、“合理”。
1企业经营业绩评价系统的理论基础(1) 资本保全理论在市场经济条件下，企业是出资者的企业，是一个资本集合体，所有者是惟一的剩余风险承担者和剩余权益享受者，出资者利益是企业最高利益。
企业成本管理中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)外文文献：China's Enterprise Cost Management Analysis and CountermeasuresAbstract: With the progress and China's traditional Cost Management model difficult to adapt to an increasingly competitive market environment. This paper exists in our country a number of Cost Management and finally put forward to address these issues a number of measures to strengthen Cost Management.Keywords:: Cost Management measuresIn a market economy conditions, as the global economic integration, the development of increasingly fierce market competition, corporate profit margins shrinking. In this case, the level of high and low business costs directly determines the size of an enterprise profitability and competitive strength. Therefore, strengthen enterprise Cost Management business has become an inevitable choice for the survival and development.First, the reality of China's Enterprise Cost Management AnalysisCost Management in our country after years of development, has made many achievements, but now faces a new environment, China's Cost Management has also exposed some new problems,mainly in the following aspects:(A) Cost Management concept behind theChinese enterprises lag behind the concept of Cost Management in pervasive phenomenon, mainly in Cost Management of the scope, purpose and means from time to biased. Many enterprises will continue to limit the scope of Cost Management within the enterprise or even only the production process at the expense of other related companies and related fields cost behavior management. We supply side, for example. The supply side of the price of the product cost of doing business, one of the most important motives. As the supply side of the price of the product and its cost plus profit, so the supply side of price in the form of its own costs to the enterprise. However, some enterprises to the supply side too much rock bottom price, as their source of high profits, without considering each other's interests, resulting in supply-side to conceal their true costs, price increase in disguise. This increase in procurement costs, thereby increasing commodity costs, making goods less competitive.The purpose of Cost Management from the point of view, many enterprises confined to lower costs, but less from the perspective of cost-effectiveness of the effectiveness of the means of cost reduction mainly rely on savings, can not be cost-effective. In traditional Cost Management, Cost Management purposes has been reduced to cut costs, saving has become the basic means to reduce costs. From the perspective of Cost Management to analyze the Cost Management of this goal, not difficult to find cost-reduction is conditional and limits, and in some cases, control of costs, could lead to product quality and enterprise efficiency decline.In addition, the vast majority of enterprises in the overall concept of lack of Cost Management. Most companies have a common phenomenon, that is, to rely on finance staff to manage costs. In the implementation of Cost Management process, some companies focus only on cost accounting; some business leaders only concerned about the financial and cost statements, using the number of statements to management costs. Although such an approach to reduce the cost to a certain role, but the final analysis, cost accounting, or ex post facto control, failed to do in advance of cost control and occurrence of process control, can not be replaced costing Cost Management.(B) Cost Management obsoleteFirst of all, from a Cost Management in general and ways of looking at, not really formed, the system's Cost Management methodology, from speaking, we have proposed the establishment of including cost projections, the cost of decision-making, cost planning, cost accounting, cost control, cost analysis, etc. In the within the new Cost Management system, but how to make this methodology in a scientific, systematic, forming an organic links there are many problems. Secondly, the specific method of Cost Management perspective, According to the survey, 55.7% of the enterprises use varieties of France, 42.8% of companies use sub-step. The development trend of current world production of many varieties of small batch production mode, this mode of production batches law applies to product cost. Currently, only 6.2% of China's enterprises to adopt this method to calculate, which indicates that the organization of production in China is still relatively extensive, paid insufficient attention to the consumer's personality.Finally, from a Cost Management tool to see, even though some enterprises to enter the computerized stage, but the cost of application management module level is not high, and many enterprises are still the manual accounting, in a modern way of technology, Information, and this is bound to constrain business further enhance the level of Cost Management, it is difficult to meet the modern Cost Management of cost Information provided by the timeliness, comprehensiveness,accuracy requirements.(C) the cost Information, a serious distortion ofIn China, there are a considerable number of enterprises there is the cost of the case Information is untrue, and this situation is getting worse. Cost Information distortion is mainly caused by the following reasons:First, costing only a focus on materials, labor, manufacturing overhead, ignoring the growing increase in the modern enterprise product development, the middle of testing and trial-and after-sales service on a small group of input costs associated with the content of the product was incomplete, does not correctly evaluate the products in the the whole process of life-cycle cost-effectiveness.The second is distortion caused by improper costing methods. A high degree of labor-intensive enterprises in the past years, the accounting of the simple assumption (that is, the number of direct labor hours or production basis for the allocation of indirect costs), usually do not cause serious distortions in product costs. But in a modern manufacturing environment, the proportion of direct labor costs declined significantly, a substantial increase in the proportion of manufacturing costs, and then use the traditional method of cost computation will produce irrational behavior, the use of traditional costing will lead to serious distortions in product cost information to enable enterprises to operate the mistake of choosing the direction of products.Third, to achieve the purpose of artificially adjust the cost of a number of hidden losses caused by a serious, corporate virtual surplus real loss. In China, some enterprises do not increase because of Cost Management, but in order to achieve improper goals or interest to do so at the cost of the external disclosure of false information. Study its causes and performance: business managers in order to gloss over its management performance, to investors, especially medium and small shareholders have a good explanation to take virtual cut costs, inflated benefits, such as Joan China source event, Guangxia event; some private enterprises do not even pay taxes in order to tax less, false purchase invoices, virtual offset value-added tax; inflated costs, pay less corporate income tax; a number of enterprise Cost Management is in chaos, infrastructure work is not solid, it is difficult to accurately account for product costs, and thus disclosed the cost of information is not accurate. (D) internal Cost Management of the establishment of the main mistakesCost of production and operation activities, a comprehensive index covering all aspects of management, but also involves all levels of personnel. However, a long time, people have been the existence of a bias, the Cost Management as a finance officer for a small number of managers patents, that the cost-effectiveness should be handled by business leaders and finance staff and to all workshops, departments, teams and groups of workers only as a producer, resulting in control costs, understand technology, understand technology, understand the financial, the majority of the workers as to which costs should be controlled, how to control problems have no intention also were unable to say in the cost-conscious indifference. Workers that Ganhaoganhuai a sample, feel market pressures, cost control initiative can not be mobilized, serious waste, mainly in energy and materials, the next material without careful planning, the next corner does not make full use of materials, energy and run , risk, dripping, and leak is serious. Cost Management of the main mistakes made to establish the Cost Management business has lost the management of large groups of promise, of course, Cost Management work is not really achieve good results. Second, strengthen enterprise Cost Management measuresCost Management for Chinese Enterprises in the problems, we should start the following efforts tostrengthen Cost Management:(A) the introduction of new ideas - the use of strategic Cost ManagementStrategic management is central to the sustained competitive advantage for businesses, competitive advantage is the core of any Strategy, it ultimately comes from enterprises to create value for customers, this value must exceed the costs of enterprises to create it. An enterprise to gain a competitive advantage need to make a choice, that is, enterprises must strive for what would be an advantage, and to what extent the problem for superiority to make a choice. This requires the introduction of strategic management of Cost Management thinking, to achieve a strategic sense of the extensions to form a strategic Cost Management. Strategic Cost Management refers to management of the specialized approach provides an analysis of the enterprise itself and its competitors information to assist managers and evaluation of the formation of corporate Strategy, thereby creating a competitive advantage in order to meet enterprises to effectively adapt to constantly changing external environment.(B) establish a new concept1, establish a system management concepts, the implementation of a comprehensive, whole process of Cost ManagementThe content and scope of the cost of doing business should not be confined to areas of production, management needs to be with the change, and as the development of management development. Cost Management should be comprehensive, the whole process, and at the design stage till the development planning stage should begin to reduce the cost of activities. Modern enterprise Cost Management should include the impact on cost changes in all aspects of the projections to penetrate the enterprise, decision-making, technology, sales and other areas in all aspects of the enterprise expansion.2, establish the concept of cost-effectiveness, cost forecasting and decision-making levels Enterprises can not succeed in the market for greater profits, they must establish the cost of determining the market concept, give full play to the cost of policy-making functions. Cost Management and enterprise's overall effectiveness should also be linked to the concept of dynamic cost-effective approach to cost and control issues, from the comparative analysis of input and output to look into the necessity and rationality of the enterprise from the perspective of efficiency to determine the increases or decreases in order to conduct a cost benefit as the center of the dynamic management.3, establish a sense of innovation, technology and insist on combiningThe vitality lies in its continued innovation, and enterprises should seize the pulse of the market, seeking mechanism innovation, vibrancy, increase scientific and technological input, and the effective use of new technologies, new equipment, new processes and new materials, relying on technology to reduce product cost. Meanwhile, cost accounting should be considered in the scientific and technological content of products, including the cost to go to facilitate enterprises to the correct decision. The formation of the product cost, the technical factors, plays an important role, to improve Cost Management, we must implement the technology-driven economic principle of combining.4, establish a people-oriented concept, create a cohesive force in enterprisePeople do not simply a tool for wealth creation, but an enterprise's largest capital, assets, resources and wealth, the main body of the enterprise, is the main Cost Management is to determine the cost of key factors. Therefore, to establish a people-oriented management thinking, and arouse people'sintellectual factors, train and develop people's ability to work, so that employees and managers on an equal footing and enjoy the same participation in power, the humanistic, democratic management thinking throughout the enterprise management process from beginning to end, so that enterprises can truly become a democratic, humane organizations, from the human heart in order to stimulate everyone's sense of responsibility and willing to devote themselves masters of the spiritual power.(C) the introduction of advanced Cost Management - activity-based costing and cost-planning methodSince the cost of the early 20th century inception, he has appeared 'standard cost', 'budget control', 'difference', 'cost-of-state analysis', 'variable cost method', 'volume-profit analysis', 'responsibility accounting', etc. a series of traditional cost accounting methods. However, in today's increasingly competitive market economy, the traditional cost accounting methods have fatal defects, thus creating an activity-based costing and cost-planning method.1, Activity-Based CostingActivity-Based Costing is based on 'cost driver' as the fundamental basis of a cost-accounting methods. Its basic principle is that consumption of output operations, operations consume resources. In the product cost, it will be the focus from the traditional 'products' move to 'work' on to work for the accounting object, and the first motivation of resources based on resource allocation of costs to the job, and then tracked by the activity driver products, the final product obtained costs. It is customer-oriented chain, to the value chain as the center of the business 'operational procedures' fundamental and thorough reform, emphasizing the coordination of corporate internal and external customer relations, starting from the enterprise as a whole, coordinating the various departments and links the relationship between the ask enterprises to material supply, production and marketing aspects of the operations form a continuous, synchronous's 'workflow', the elimination of all can not increase the value of the operation, so that enterprises in the state continued to improve and promote enterprise-wide optimization, establishing competitive advantage.2, cost planning methodThe cost of planning the basic ideas: (1) to full life-cycle-based, market-oriented development of target cost. Basic formula is: target cost = expected market price - target profit. (2) product design stage the cost of squeezing. This process can be expressed as the cost of the 'Settings - decomposition - to achieve - (re-setting) - (re-decomposition) - (another achievement) - ... ...', and repeatedly as well as endless, until it reaches target cost. (3) the cost of production at the manufacturing stage decomposition and pressure transmission. The target cost pressures refined to teams and groups, and even individuals and vendors. (4) pre-production phase of the feedback control. Through trial and feedback from the production process and timely leak fill a vacancy, strengthen internal management, improve cost control management through a variety of incentive measures to make the cost of the ideological objectives of planning can be the greatest degree of implementation. (5) The target cost optimization. Product to meet the needs of market competition must be constantly adjusted and optimized so that the cost of setting goals to keep up with the pace of technological and market changes, so that the cost of the entire planning process to form a complete cycle, continuous improvement, and constantly perfect, and always be able to adapt to the changing market.(Iv) computer technology in Enterprise Cost ManagementAt present, the computer is an indispensable tool for economic life, to modern information technology-based Cost Management Cost Management information system has become a symbol of modernization.1, the software applicationLOTUS, EXCEL and other spreadsheet software has a powerful form processing, database management and statistical charts processing functions, is commonly used office automation software. They do not have programming, flexible and convenient, the use of low cost, high efficiency, use of these software can be easily and quickly assist management in cost projections, decision-making, and can control the process of implementation of the monitoring analysis, received good results. Businesses can combine their own characteristics, commissioned by software developers for their costs of developing a more professional management software.2, the application ofThe network has a strong scalability, enables the sharing of resources, improve efficiency and reduce costs. Internal and external Internet connection of the timely transmission of a variety of cost information, and can interactively communicate with the outside world, learn from each other and promote the application of various Cost Management techniques to achieve Cost Management objectives.(E) to take measures to ensure cost-effective informationCompanies should establish a sound internal control system, through accounting and other business processes control, help reduce the occurrence of the phenomenon of accounting information Cuobi to a certain extent, the accounting and other information to ensure true and reliable. For example, a good internal control system, required documents must be recorded against previous audit, the certificate of transfer must follow certain procedures, to the reconciliation table cards and checking accounts. Through these means of control, it is possible to reduce the incidence of errors to ensure the accuracy and reliability of accounting information and thus the basis for cost accounting and management information is reliable.Enterprises also need to improve the management and accounting staff of professional ethics. The main body of the implementation of the system is the enterprise managers and decision-making participation in the operation of accounting personnel, in the generation and provision of relevant information, on one hand to enhance the legal awareness, on the one hand to enhance the sense of moral self-discipline, strengthen the moral sense of responsibility and sense of responsibility to maintain professional conscience, economic objectives of enterprises and managers to enhance the double moral standards.In addition to strengthen the market research and information feedback in the Cost Management applications. Information as a business activity is an important factor in the cost management an integral part of. With economic development, enterprise cost management level, with the development of the situation can improve, operation can proceed smoothly, to a large extent also depends on the level of the cost of feedback. Therefore, the enterprise cost management must also adapt to this objective, continually improve the level of information management, seize the opportunity to truly become the strong market competition.中国企业成本管理的现状分析与对策摘要：随着中国所取得的进展，中国传统的成本管理模式已经难以适应竞争日益激烈的市场环境。
工程造价专业毕业外文文献、中英对照
工程造价专业毕业外文文献、中英对照中文翻译：工程造价专业毕业外文文献工程造价专业是一种重要的工程技术专业，主要负责工程投资的评估、选择和控制工程项目成本，以及项目质量、进度和安全。
因此，工程造价专业需要具备丰富的知识和技能，包括工程建设、经济学、管理学、数学、统计学等方面。
为了提高工程造价专业学生的综合能力，学习外文文献是不可或缺的步骤。
本文将介绍几篇与工程造价专业相关的外文文献，并提供中英文对照。
1）《The Role of Quantity Surveyors in Sustainable Construction》该文研究了数量调查师在可持续建筑中的作用，并深入探讨了数量调查师在项目的可持续性评估、营建阶段和运营阶段的角色和责任。
该文指出，数量调查师可以通过成本控制、资源利用、和材料选择等方面促进可持续建筑的发展，为未来可持续发展提供支持。
中文翻译：数量调查师在可持续建筑中的作用2）《Cost engineering》该文研究了造价工程的理论和实践，并提供了一系列工具和方法用于项目成本的控制和评估。
该文还深入探讨了工程造价和项目管理之间的关系，并提供了一些实用的案例研究来说明造价工程的实际应用。
中文翻译：造价工程3）《Construction cost management: learning from case studies》该文通过案例分析的方式来探讨建筑项目成本管理的实践。
该文提供了多个案例研究，旨在向读者展示如何运用不同的方法来控制和评估项目成本，并阐述了思考成本问题时需要考虑的多个因素。
中文翻译：建筑项目成本管理：案例学习4）《Project Cost Estimation and Control: A Practical Guide to Construction Management》该书是一本实用指南，详细介绍了在工程起始阶段进行项目成本估算的方法和技巧，以及如何在项目执行阶段进行成本控制。
外文翻译---物流企业成本管理实施战略
附录C外文原文Logistics enterprises to implement the strategic costManagement Writer：Dauben.J.W.Source：Oxford EconomicTime ：September 2009.[Abstract]The basic idea of strategic cost management is a costfactor to the competitive position of the same company linked to seek theimprovement of enterprise competitiveness and sustained reductions in thecost of the best path. In this paper, China's overall logistics costs arehigher status, the use of strategic cost management theory, analysis ofthe logistics enterprises in strategic cost management objectives. On thisbasis, from the structural cost driver and the implementation of costdriver put forward a specific cost management measures.In the economic globalization today, showing a network of logistics industry, specialization and standardization features. Theworld's logistics costsaccounted for an average of about 12% of globalGDP.First, the core idea of the strategic cost managementThe 20th century, 80 years, the British scholarKenneth Simon astrategic cost management (strategic cost management), that the strategiccost management is' by the enterprises themselves, as well as competitors,analysis of relevant cost information for managers to provide strategicdecision-making needs information '. In 1985, HarvardBusinessSchoolprofessor Michael Porter published a 'competitive advantage', by applyingthe value chain analysis, and cost drivers analysis tools to create costadvantages.U.S. management accounting academics and others to JiekesangkePorter's strategic management thinking should be integrated in the cost ofmanagement, the formation of the Cinque cost management model, thestrategic cost management is defined as' in the strategic management ofone or more of the stage of the cost of information management of the useof '.U.S. well-known accounting professor at Cooper and Sila Mo was ofstrategic cost management made the following definition: 'StrategicManagement">Cost Management means businesses can use a series of costmanagement methods to simultaneously reduce costs and achieve the purposeof strengthening the strategic position'.In short, strategic cost management is to enhance the competitiveadvantages of enterprises at the same time the cost of management isstrategic management thinking into the cost management, through managementaccounting provides an analysis of theenterprise itself and itscompetitors information to assist the formation and evaluation ofenterprise managers strategy, the formulation of an overall strategy forenterprises to provide relevant cost information, so that enterprises canflexibly adapt to changes in the external environment, to maintain a morelong-term competitive advantage.And compared to the traditional cost management, strategic cost managementwith extraversion (achieved on the cost management beyond the scope of payattention to the external competitive environment of enterprises), longterm(concerned about how to enable enterprises to obtain long-termeconomic interests and maintain long-term competitive advantage ),competitive (based on the analysis of competitive advantages ofenterprises), dynamic (based on different strategies to select a differentcost management type) and to provide more non-financial information and soon. Second, the logistics enterprise strategic cost managementobjectivesThe basic idea of strategic cost management is the cost factorsand the competitive position of enterprises linked to seek the improvementof enterprise competitiveness and sustained reductions in the cost of thebest path.According to the strategic cost management ideas, logisticsenterprise strategic cost management should be to achieve lower costs andenhanced competitive position of a dual purpose. In any competitiveenvironment is the foundation of the success of cost advantage or value ofthe advantage.Cost advantage through cost-effective to bring high profits; thevalue of benefits for the products, based on the competitor's products canprovide customers with more value-added, thereby enhancing its marketshare. The company's competitive position and its cost can also be used toprovide customers with value-added measure. When product prices are thesame, providing a value-added, the more the recognition by customers,competitive advantages more obvious; When products deliver value to thesame, the cost of lower profits, the more the more it has the upper handin pricing to give Customer delivered value-added space will be.At the same time, only when the supply chain companies to sharemore profits, competitive advantage can be sustained. Therefore, thelogistics enterprise strategic cost management goal is the pursuit ofbusiness profits and customer value and maximize.Third, based on strategic cost management perspective of costdrivers response logistics cost driver is the business strategy oflogistics from a strategic business impact on product cost and a number offactors. It is compared with the operating cost driver, with threecharacteristics: First, the strategy and logistics enterprises are closelylinked, such as the size of logistics enterprises, the degree ofintegration; Second is the impact of product cost is more long-term, morelasting and more far-reaching; Third, the formation and change to the costdriver is difficult.Logistics cost drivers can be divided into business strategy andimplementation of structural cost driver of cost drivers. In calculatingthe costs of these cost drivers are not taken into account, they are oftenignored by traditional cost management.However, the strategic costmanagement, we must engage in strategic cost drivers of logistics costs ofthe correct classified, so as to logistics enterprises to developeffective cost management and cost to provide a clear idea of decisionmakingand strategy.1. Analysis of the structural cost driver to find the path oflogistics enterprises in strategic cost management with thecharacteristics of the logistics industry, China's logistics enterprisesin the structural cost driver analysis should include the logisticsindustry, political and economic environment, geographic location, naturalconditions, the size of the logistics, logistics technology and verticalintegration.Present,China's logistics enterprises from the following threepaths to the implementation of strategic cost management:(1) The realization of the logistics of scale. Along with'logistics hot' swept the land of China, China all kinds of logisticsenterprises have been established.These are mostly small and scattered logistics enterprises, thelack of socialization and organized, operating costs are too high, servicefunctions imperfect, can do 'one-stop' services to small businesses. Thus,by numerous aspects of the logistics process of the organic integration,the promotion of logistics enterprises from a single transport,warehousing, storage, transportation and other service functions to theintegrated service business development. Achieve the logistics of scaleand reduce logistics cost has been a priority. To this end, China'slogistics and distribution companies need to rapidly improve thelevel of social networking, vigorously develop the logistics servicesystem and improve the logistics efficiency of scale, economies of scaleas soon as possible logistics and to build economies of scale as a basisfor further cost advantage.(2) continuouslyimprove logistics technology.At present, the way professional logistics services was verylimited, the overall logistics enterprise management level needs to beimproved. Most of the companies involved in logistics services will simplyprovide transportation (delivery), and storage services.In addition, EOS (Electronic Ordering System, electronic orderingsystems), EDI (Electronic Data Interchange, electronic data interchangetechnology), RF (Rapid Fabricate, RF), GIS (Global Information System,Geographic Information Systems) and other newlogistics technology Logistics in China in the field of application levelis still relatively low. Today only 39% of China's logistics enterpriseshave information management systems and capability was very incomplete.Neither target activities of the logistics for effective tracking andmonitoring, it can not effectively manage and analyze large amounts ofdata streams, but simply to rely on manpower to manage, is extremelyunfavorable to logistics cost control.To this end, China's logistics enterprises need from the basictechnology of the constituent elements of the logistics start logisticbusiness processes to improve the technical level, and strengthen thelogistics cost management, high-quality,cost-effective logistics servicesto ensure the efficient and smooth flow of logistics activities.(3) actively promote the vertical integration. As supply chainmanagement thinking of the promotion, logistics enterprises should notonly be confined to corporate customers, providing traditional logisticsservices, need to provide management, consulting and technical supportservices, such as distribution processing, logistics and informationservices, inventory management, logistics and other value-added servicesas well as the full range of logistics services solutions.In addition, the process of logistics activities should bedifferent logistics functions, logistics links to the use of integrated,so to simplify and reduce the logistics chain in order to reduce theamount of logistics operations to improve resource utilization and dataavailability, improve processing speed and processing efficiency ofoperations . All of this, no doubt can not do without the support of thelogistics related businesses. To this end, China's logistics businessneeds and related enterprises vertical integration of various logisticsactivities integration and systematic processing, thus optimizing resourceallocation, optimizing industrial structure and economic operation and tofurther reduce costs, improve efficiency, enhance their overall strength,to achieve sustainable development by leaps and bounds.2. Analysis of the implementation of cost driver, design logisticsenterprise strategic cost managementStrategy combines the characteristics of China's logisticsindustry, logistics companies on implementation cost driver analysisshould include the resources and facilities utilization, value chainintegration, contracting, management system, the establishment and fullparticipation in management, at present, China's logistics enterprises cantake the following five a strategy to implement strategic cost management:(1) increase the utilization of logistics resources andfacilities.In actual operation, the logistics chain by reducing losses andimprove utilization of logistics resources created by the profit space isconsiderable. According to theory, the use of logistics equipment, facilities and equipment utilization, the more conducive to thelogistics costs.In view of the basic conditions of China's modern logistics has been inplace, the gap with the developed countries mainly in integrating the useof context, so the focus of China's logistics enterprises should considerhow the existing stock of resources in an effective allocation ofresources in the integration process of the formation of a wellfunctioningrapid supply chain system, thereby enhancing the utilizationof resources and facilities and its own market competitiveness. To thisend, China's logistics enterprises need systems integration in all linksof the logistics business as well as social resources, so that saveresources, improve logistics efficiency.Such as strengthening the development of logistics planning,science and development of material consumption quotas, rationalorganization of transport andstorage.(2) to strengthen the logistics value chain integration.In the Government's policy support and vigorously promote, China'slogistics enterprises has entered a rapid development stage. At the sametime, highway, railway, aviation and other basic transport system ofcontinuous improvement, as well as the rapid development of informationtechnology. Logistics enterprises with great potential for development. Atthis point, the logistics enterprise's core competitiveness, not only in acertain value links, more importantly, in its procurement, transportation,warehousing, distribution, services, integration of various value chainsto generate out of the system benefits. Thus, for China's logisticsenterprises, it must be strong coordination of a full range of upstreamand downstream value of the logistics service process in any part of theoutreach activities, in order to improve efficiency through theintegration of value chains, in order to lower the total cost of logisticsbusiness opportunities.(3) emphasis on the signing of the contract logistics.As a logistics company to connect the key to both supply anddemand of goods, generally in conjunction with a number of manufacturerssigned a long-term logistics contracts, and maintain a more stablepartnership. At this point, the logistics contract is no longer a simplesense of the agents, transportation, warehousing, storage, customsclearance, etc. The signing of the contract, it also includes the designof the case of the logistics process management.Moreover, the process program to be able to solve the logisticsenterprises in a variety of difficult problems, to simplify the logisticsprocesses, reduce logistics costs, improve management, enhance economicefficiency and market competitiveness effect. This is undoubtedly thedecision of the general logistics contract involves many links in a longtime and require complex features.In this regard, China's logistics enterprises must be integratedwith national conditions and their development status, emphasis on thelogistics contract, rationality, integrity, feasibility, economy, and theclarity of the scope of services, contract terms of plasticity and so on.Ensure that the signing of the contract and performance of thelogistics process, the anticipated cost of waste to a minimum.(4) the establishment of logistics enterprise informationmanagement system.China's logistics business needs through modern information managementsystems to control and reduce logistics costs: on the one hand allows avariety of logistics operations or business processes to quickly andaccurately carried out; the other hand, aggregate data through informationsystems do a good job prediction analysis, can effectively control theoccurrence of logistics costs.Therefore, logistics information management system establishedlogistics operation can carry out an overall control of the entireprocess, reducing energy consumption, reduce the incidence of workaccidents, reduce incident handling and waste disposalcosts andultimately to create a low-cost logistics enterprises in strategicbranding. (5) the implementation of full participation in the management oflogistics enterprises.Logistics enterprises in various departments with the cost of eachemployee is directly related to only rely on co-operation between allstaff work together will be the cost of logistics enterprises in order toput real control, to better achieve cost management objectives. Thus, thenumber of employees involved and their sense of responsibility for theimpact of logistics costs is very important. Based on an analysis, staffcentripetal force of the specific impact of logistics costs can be reducedto two aspects: one is explicit costs such as material consumptionhigh,and low capacity utilization; the other hand, hidden costs, such asemployees not united, work depression, indifference, etc. for their ownbusiness.To this end, China's logistics enterprises must enhance the costmanagement of all staff awareness and encourage the full participation ofall employees to fully organize and mobilize the enthusiasm and creativityof employees to reduce the cost of work into the logistics operation inevery detail of the process. Eventually succeed in building a low-cost,long-term competitive advantage in the international logistics market toimprove their competitive position.Main references[1] Hum Fuming, Ding Gang, Lu Xian. Managerial Accounting [M].Guangzhou: Jinan University Press, 2006.[2] America Ronald H * Barrow. Logistics Management - -supply chain planning, organization and control of [M]. 2nd edition.Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 2006.[3] Michael Porter〕〔America. Competitive advantage [M].Beijing: Hoxie Publishing House, 1997.[4] Lei Xing-Hub, Su Tao Yong. Supply Chain Strategic CostManagement [J]. FuranUniversity: Natural Science Edition, 2007 (4).中文译文物流企业成本管理实施战略[摘要]战略成本管理的基本思想就是成本因素的竞争地位相同的公司与寻求提高企业竞争力和持续削减成本的最佳路径。
第三方物流成本的管理外文翻译(适用于毕业论文外文翻译+中英文对照)
The application of third party logistics to implement the Just-In-Time system with minimum cost under a global environmentAbstractThe integration of the Just-In-Time (JIT) system with supply chain management has been attracting more and more attention recently. Within the processes of the JIT system, the upstream manufacturer is required to deliver products using smaller delivery lot sizes, at a higher delivery frequency. For the upstream manufacturer who adopts sea transportation to deliver products, a collaborative third party logistics (3PL) can act as an interface between the upstream manufacturer and the downstream partner so that the products can be delivered globally at a lower cost to meet the JIT needs of the downstream partner. In this study, a quantitative JIT cost model associated with the application of third party logistics is developed to investigate the optimal production lot size and delivery lot size at the minimum total cost. Finally, a Taiwanese optical drive manufacturer is used as an illustrative case study to demonstrate the feasibility and rationality of the model.1. IntroductionWith the globalization of businesses, the on-time delivery of products through the support of a logistics system has become more and more important. Global corporations must constantly investigate their production systems, distribution systems, and logistics strategies to provide the best customer service at the lowest possible cost.Goetschalckx, Vidal, and Dogan (2002)stated that long-range survival for international corporations will be very difficult without a highly optimized, strategic, and tactical global logistics plan. Stadtler (2005) mentions that the activities and processes should be coordinated along a supply chain to capturedecisions in procurement, transportation, production and distribution adequately, and many applications of supply chain management can be found in the literature (e.g. Ha and Krishnan, 2008, Li and Kuo, 2008and Wang and Sang, 2005).Recently, the study of the Just-In-Time (JIT) system under a global environment has attracted more attention in the Personal Computer (PC) related industries because of the tendency towards vertical disintegration. The JIT system can be implemented to achieve numerous goals such as cost reduction, lead-time reduction, quality assurance, and respect for humanity (Monden, 2002). Owing to the short product life cycle of the personal computer industry, downstream companies usually ask their upstream suppliers to execute the JIT system, so that the benefits, like the risk reduction of price loss incurred from inventory, lead times reduction, on-time delivery, delivery reliability, quality improvement, and lowered cost could be obtained (Shin, Collier, & Wilson, 2000). According to the JIT policy, the manufacturer must deliver the right amount of components, at the right time, and to the right place (Kim & Kim, 2002). The downstream assembler usually asks for higher delivery frequency and smaller delivery lot sizes so as to reduce his inventory cost in the JIT system (Kelle, khateeb, & Miller, 2003). However, large volume products are conveyed using sea transportation, using larger delivery lot sizes to reduce transportation cost during transnational transportation. In these circumstances, corporations often choose specialized service providers to outsource their logistics activities for productivity achievement and/or service enhancements (La Londe & Maltz, 1992). The collaboration of third party logistics (3PL) which is globally connected to the upstream manufacturer and the downstream assembler will be a feasible alternative when the products have to be delivered to the downstream assembler through the JIT system. In this study, the interaction between the manufacturer and the 3PL will be discussed to figure out the related decisions such as the optimal production lot size of the manufacturer and the delivery lot size from the manufacturer to the 3PL, based on its contribution towards obtaining the minimum total cost. In addition, the related assumptions and restrictions aredeliberated as well so that the proposed model is implemented successfully. Finally, a Taiwanese PC-related company which practices the JIT system under a global environment is used to illustrate the optimal production lot size and delivery lot size of the proposed cost model.2. Literature reviewThe globalization of the network economy has resulted in a whole new perspective of the traditional JIT system with the fixed quantity-period delivery policy (Khan & Sarker, 2002). The fixed quantity-period delivery policy with smaller quantities and shorter periods is suitable to be executed among those companies that are close to each other. However, it would be hard for the manufacturer to implement the JIT system under a global environment, especially when its products are conveyed by transnational sea transportation globally. Therefore, many corporations are trying to outsource their global logistics activities strategically in order to obtain the numerous benefits such as cost reduction and service improvement. Hertz and Alfredsson (2003) have stated that the 3PL, which involves a firm acting as a middleman not taking title to the products, but to whom logistics activities are outsourced, has been playing a very important role in the global distribution network. Wang and Sang (2005)also mention that a 3PL firm is a professional logistics company profiting by taking charge of a part or the total logistics in the supply chain of a focal enterprise. 3PL also connects the suppliers, manufacturers, and the distributors in supply chains and provide substance movement andlogistics information flow. The core competitive advantage of a 3PL firm comes from its ability to integrate services to help its customers optimize their logistics management strategies, build up and operate their logistics systems, and even manage their whole distribution systems (Wang & Sang, 2005).Zimmer (2001) states that production depends deeply on the on-time delivery of components, which can drastically reduce buffer inventories, when JIT purchasingis implemented. When the manufacturer has to comply with the assembler under the JIT system, the inventories of the manufacturer will be increased to offset the reduction of the assembler’s inventories (David and Chaime, 2003, Khan and Sarker, 2002and Sarker and Parija, 1996).The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model is widely used to calculate the optimal lot size to reduce the total cost, which is composed of ordering cost, setup cost, and inventory holding cost for raw materials and manufactured products (David and Chaime, 2003, Kelle et al., 2003, Khan and Sarker, 2002and Sarker and Parija, 1996). However, some issues such as the integration of collaborative 3PL and the restrictions on the delivery lot size by sea transportation are not discussed further in their studies. For the above involved costs, David and Chaime (2003) further discuss a vendor–buyer relationship to include two-sided transportation costs in the JIT system. Koulamas, 1995and Otake et al., 1999 describe that the annual setup cost is equal to the individual setup cost times the total number of orders in a year. McCann, 1996and Tyworth and Zeng, 1998both state that the transportation cost can be affected by freight rate, annual demand, and the products’ weight. Compared to the above studies which assume that the transportation rate is constant per unit, Swenseth and Godfrey (2002)assumed that the transportation rate is constant per shipment, which will result in economies of scale for transportation. Besides, McCann (1996)presented that the total logistics costs are the sum of ordering costs, holding costs, and transportation costs. A Syarif, Yun, and Gen (2002)mention that the cost incurred from a distribution center includes transportation cost and operation cost. Taniguchi, Noritake, Yamada, and Izumitani (1999)states that the costs of pickup/delivery and land-haul trucks should be included in the cost of the distribution center as well.The numerous costs involved will be formulated in different ways when the manufacturer operates the JIT system associated with a collaborative 3PL under a global environment. Kreng and Wang (2005) presented a cost model, which can beimplemented in the JIT system under a global environment, to investigate the most appropriate mode of product delivery strategy. They discussed the adaptability of different transportation means for different kinds of products. In this study, the implementation of sea transportation from the manufacturer to the 3PL provider will be particularized, and the corresponding cost model will also be presented to obtain the minimum total cost, the optimal production lot size, and the optimal delivery lot size from the manufacturer to the 3PL provider. Finally, a Taiwanese company is used for the case study to illustrate and explore the feasibility of the model.3. The formulation of a JIT cost model associated with the 3PLBefore developing the JIT cost model, the symbols and notations used throughout this study are defined below:B3PL’s pickup cost per unit product (amount per unit)Cj3PL’s cost of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3,…,n (amount per year)DP annual demand rate of the product (units per year)Dr annual demand of raw materials (units per year)D customers’ demand at a specific interval (units per shipment)E annual inventory holding cost of 3PL (amount per year)F transportation cost of the j th transportation container type from themanufacturer to the 3PL, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, n (amount per lot)F freight rate from the 3PL provider to the assembler (amount per kilogram)Hp inventory holding cost of a unit of the product (amount per year)Hr inventory holding cost of raw materials per unit (amount per year)Ij average product inventory of the j th transportation container type in the manufacturer, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, n (amount per year)I annual profit margin of 3PL (%)K ordering cost (amount per order)Kj number of shipments from the 3PL provider to the assembler when the delivery lot size from the manufacturer to the 3PL provider is Qj with the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, n(kj=Qj/d)M∗ optimal number of shipments that manufacturer delivers with the optimal total costactual number of shipments of the j th transportation container type with the minimum total cost, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, nMj number of shipments of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, nnumber of shipments of the j th transportation container type with the minimum total cost, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, nN∗ optimal production lot size of the manufacturer (units per lot)optimal production lot size of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, n (units per lot)Nj production lot size of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, n (units per lot)Nr ordering quantity of raw material (units per order)P production rate of product (units per year)maximum delivery lot size of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …, n (units per lot)q∗ optimal delivery lot size of the manufacturer (units per lot)qj actual delivery lot size of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …,n (units per lot)Rj loading percentage of the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …,n(Rj=qj/Qj)Rj real number of shipments from the 3PL provider to the assembler when the delivery lot size from the manufacturer to the 3PL provider is qj with the j th transportation container type, where j= 1, 2, 3, …,n(rj=qj/d)S setup cost (amount per setup)W weight of product (kilogram per unit)Λ quantity of raw materials required in producing one unit of a product (units)Tomas and Griffin (1996)considered that a complete supply chain should consist of five participants, including the raw materials supplier, the manufacturer, the assembler, the warehouse operator, and the consumer. This study mainly focuses on the relationships among the manufacturer, the 3PL provider and the assembler within the JIT system under a global environment. In order to achieve the fixed quantity-period JIT delivery policy, which implies that the actual delivery lot size has to be determined by identifying the downstream assembler’s needs instead of the upstream manufact ure’s economical delivery lot size, higher transportation costs with higher delivery frequency are necessary. Since the JIT system are more appropriately executed among those companies that are close to each other, a collaborative 3PL connected the upstream manufacture with the downstream assembler is necessary when the products have to be delivered from the upstream manufacture to the downstream assembler by sea transportation over a long distance. This study proposes a JIT cost model to obtain the optimal production lot size, the actual delivery lot size, the most suitable transportation container type, and the exact number of shipments from the manufacturer to the 3PL provider at the minimum total cost.This study makes assumptions of the JIT system as follows:(1) There is only one assembler and only one manufacturer for each product.(2) The production rate of the manufacturer is uniform, finite, and higher thanthe demand rate of the assembler.(3) There is no shortage and the quality is consistent in both raw materials and products.(4) The demand for products that the assembler receives is fixed and is at regular intervals.(5) Qj is much greater than demand at a regular interval,d.(6) The transportation rates from the manufacturer to the 3PL and from the 3PL to the assembler are computed by the number of shipments and the product’s weight, respectively, and,(7) The space of th e manufacturer’s warehouse is sufficient for keeping all inventories of products that the manufacturer produces.According to the above assumptions from (1), (2), (3)and (4), Fig. 1illustrates the relationships among the manufacturer, the 3PL provider, and the assembler, where the Fig. 1represents the inventory of manufacturer’s raw materials, the inventory of products inside the manufacturer, the inventory of the 3PL provider, and the inventory of the assembler from top to bottom (Kreng & Wang, 2005). This study also adopts the Fig. 1 to demonstrate the collaboration of the 3PL provider which will be an interface connecting the manufacturer and the assembler. During the period T1, the inventory of products with the manufacturer will be increased gradually because the production quantity is larger than the demand quantity. However, during the period T2, the inventory of products will be decreased because the production has been stopped.中文翻译：在全球环境下第三方物流以最小的成本实现了Just-In-Time系统的应用摘要：JUST-IN-TIME（JIT）系统，供应链管理的整合，最近已经吸引了越来越多的关注。
企业成本控制外文翻译参考文献
企业成本控制外文翻译参考文献企业成本控制外文翻译参考文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)译文：成本控制成本控制，也被称为遏制成本或管理成本，一个广阔的成本管理技术，它的经济增长目标是降低成本提高企业效率。
企业使用的成本控制方法，监测，评价，并最终提升效率的具体领域，如部门、产品线。
20世纪90年代的成本控制措施，受到了美国企业的首要关注。
一般而言，外包企业重组、撤资的外围活动，大规模裁员等成本控制战略被认为是升提升企业利润和维持企业竞争优势的需要。
其目的往往是降低企业的生产成本，这样该企业给出的销售价格就比其竞争对手具更大的利润。
一些成本控制的支持者认为，这种战略的成本削减计划必须慎重，因为并非所有降低成本的方法，都会对企业产生有利的影响。
在20世纪90年代的一个显著的例子,首席执行官邓拉普,绰号“电锯阿尔”，尽管他大幅降低企业的生产成本，但他领导的小器具制造公司依旧未能盈利。
邓拉普解雇了成千上万的工人和出售企业的业务,在他担任CEO两年内贡献不大，公司的竞争地位和股票的价格大幅下滑。
因此，在1998年公司董事会解雇了邓拉普，对他“成本控制一招”的管理方法失去了信心。
成本控制是一个持续的过程，与拟议的年度预算配合使用。
该预算有助于：（1）组织、协调生产和销售、服务和管理职能;（2）采取最大程度地利用现有的机会。
根据财政历年的进步形式，将预算与实际结果作比，生成新的计划和经验教训，用以评价目前的行动。
控制是指通过管理层的努力来影响个人的行为，由谁负责执行任务,承担成本,并获得收入。
管理是一个过程，将其分为两个阶段：规划是指管理计划的方式，希望人们人们能够执行的程序，而控制是指受雇于这些计划的程序是否符合实际表现。
通过预算过程管理和会计控制、建立全面的公司目标,明确责任中心，确定各责任中心的具体目标,设计的程序和标准报到和评价。
一个分部的业务纳入预算的组成部分，由责任方控制的。
责任中心适用于组织单位和职能部门。
毕业论文外文文献翻译We-need-strategic-cost-management我们需要战略成本管理
毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：我们需要战略成本管理文献、资料英文题目：We need strategic cost management 文献、资料来源：文献、资料发表（出版）日期：院（部）：专业：班级：姓名：学号：指导教师：翻译日期： 2017.02.14本科毕业论文（设计）外文翻译原文：We need strategic cost managementWe need strategic cost management? As noted earlier, the global financial crisis continues to wantonly slightly, off-season already unsolicited, but also to a year was bad, but even worse this year, Xi. Improve efficiency, reduce costs, many companies have become one of the ultimate weapon. Consequently, from Europe to the Americas, from global to domestic, sounded a dismissal, caused many large and small vibration. Various enterprises began Wujin their own property, to control expenditure, lowering of standards, so these are all related to the cost of this topic.In fact, the companies cut costs, all costs should not be without identification, "indiscriminate white uniform." If a business manager to every expenditure appears to cut off the excess, it is likely this weakened the competitiveness of enterprises and thus affects the business, results of more harm than good. Therefore, managers should be the perspective of corporate strategy to control costs and avoid damage to the value of those core elements of the decision. Consequently, cost-plus strategy, it leads to strategic cost management topics.He suggested approach for dedicating resources to supplier cost management may seem cost prohibitive. However, the organizations studied unanimously agree that they receive extremely high returns on their investments in supplier cost management efforts. The money spent on supplier cost management efforts. The money spent on supplier should-cost analysis, supplier development, and other tools and approaches pays for itself many times over in terms of reducing costs and bottom-line prices paid to suppliers. for large fortune 500 companies, successful strategic cost management may mean the addition of dedicated personnel to focus on supplier cost management. for smaller organizations which might not have as great an on-going need, or as great an asset base.So, what is strategic cost management? Strategy can be defined as the establishment of their fundamental long-term goals and to achieve the goals to take the necessary action planning and resource allocation, is to guide the overall plans and strategies. The so-called strategic cost management from a strategic perspective to study the formation and control costs. In established under the principle of corporate strategy, in terms of cost management for the strategic choice and design, it will lead to the final delivery of business products and services to lower costs, not every part of Shang Du Zhuiqiu lowest cost. Includes two levels of content: one from a cost perspective, the selection and optimization of business strategy; Second, the implementation of cost control strategies. Strategic cost management thinking on strategic cost management theoretical framework of the general and summary, which determines the strategic cost management theory and methodology to start the basic ideas.In the background of the crisis under the cost-cutting, more Xuyao follow strategic cost management thinking, to have a choice cut, not important link in the conduct of large Ke Yi drastic cuts; and the related core competitive Li's Guanjianyaosu, but not rule out the possibility of expanding into so targeted, there are tight with loose, smart, cost-cutting, a square is not only lower costs, but also without prejudice to the company health and even enhance the core competitiveness of the ideal choice.The basic tools of strategic cost management cost management strategy has three elements: value chain analysis, strategic positioning analysis and cost driver analysis. They also analyzed in the framework of strategic management and cost factors closely related to the three basic analysis tools.(A) of the value chain analysis of each end product from initial raw materials into the hands until it reaches the final consumer, intermediate to go through numerous interrelated operating procedures, these operating procedures is both a product of the production process, but it is also a value formation and value-added process to form the value chain (Value-chain). Value chain analysis can be divided into industry specific value chain analysis, value chain analysis and value chainanalysis of competitors. Through the analysis of the industry value chain, we understand the position of enterprises in industry and trade situation and prospects; through its own analysis of the value chain, eliminate non-value-added factors, we can not affect the decline in cost competitiveness of the premise; by value chain analysis of the competitors, you can know ourselves and insight into the situation, and the resulting business cost management strategies.(B) the strategic positioning analysis. Strategic positioning means of selecting the means of competition, and compete with rivals. Enterprises should first of all the internal and external environment in which their own detailed investigation of; then Queding enterprises are entering the Xing Ye Ying, based on the market by Shige Yijisuoxu Kaifa of products; finally determine to what strategy to ensure that enterprises in the selected industry, market and product stand firm in the defeat, to obtain profits above the industry average. To illustrate, such as cost leadership strategy, which is all a strategy most clearly? Under the guidance in this strategy, Enterprise's goal is to become of its properties to low-cost, Sheng Chan (services) Chang Shang, that is, offerings (or service) features, little quality difference in the conditions, cutting costs gain a competitive edge. If enterprises can create and maintain a comprehensive cost leader. That is as long as the price control in the industry average or close to the average level, we can obtain better than average results of operations. With opponents equal to or lower price, the cost leader in low-cost advantage will translate into higher earnings. The difference between strategic requirements of enterprises leading the extensive attention on some aspects of customers in unique within the industry, or the difference in cost is difficult to further expand the circumstances, the production of more powerful than the competition, better quality, service and better products to show the difference between operating . Of course, this difference should the buyer want or willing to accept. If a leader can be different, you can get the price premium paid, or in a certain price to sell more products, or cyclical, seasonal market access, such as shrinking the buyer loyalty during the corresponding benefits. Requirements between the logic of a leading strategic business choices that are conducive to competition and make theirown unique nature of the business, focusing on innovation. In addition to these, other common gathering strategies targeted strategic positioning, life cycle strategy and integration strategy and so on.(C) Cost Driver Analysis. Cost drivers is the driving force caused by production costs and causes of occurrence. Strategic cost driver is mainly a strategic cost management perspective, research on the company's cost structure and cost behavior of long-term impact of cost drivers. Theory of competitive strategy to create a business management scientist Michael * Porter will be divided into ten areas of these factors, namely economies of scale, learning curve, production capacity, use the form, contact, mutual relations, joint, select the time, independent policy, geography factor in location and form of government. Some scholars further strategic structural cost drivers and cost driver is divided into two types of implementation of cost drivers. The case of structural cost control, such as Southwest Airlines in response to competition, positioning its service route rather than the full route in a particular short-distance flights to avoid engaging in large-scale airport operations, to cancel dinner, reservation and other special services, and the establishment of automatic ticketing system and other measures to reduce costs. The results of many of its daily flights and low issue price attracted a lot of short-range travelers, lead to the establishment of the final cost.Source:Shank. J.K and V. Govindarajan,1993.”We need strategic cost management” . Harvard business review. August.pp.112-135.译文：我们需要战略成本管理我们需要战略成本管理？就像之前提到的，全球的金融危机继续，金融危机的时段过去后，提高效率，降低成本，已成为许多公司的最终武器。
公司治理外文文献及翻译 精品
附录A公司治理与高管薪酬：一个应急框架总体概述通过整合组织和体制的理论，本文开发了一个高管薪酬的应急办法和它在不同的组织和体制环境下的影响。
高管薪酬的研究大都集中在委托代理框架上，并承担一种行政奖励和业绩成果之间的关系。
我们提出了一个框架，审查了其组织的背景和潜在的互补性方面的行政补偿和不同的公司治理在不同的企业和国家水平上体现的替代效应。
我们还讨论了执行不同补偿政策方法的影响，像“软法律”和“硬法律”。
在过去的20年里，世界上越来越多的公司从一个固定的薪酬结构转变为与业绩相联系的薪酬结构，包括很大一部分的股权激励。
因此，高管补偿的经济影响的研究已经成为公司治理内部激烈争论的一个话题。
正如Bruce，Buck，和Main指出，“近年来，关于高管报酬的文献的增长速度可以与高管报酬增长本身相匹敌。
”关于高管补偿的大多数实证文献主要集中在对美国和英国的公司部门，当分析高管薪酬的不同组成部分产生的组织结果的时候。
根据理论基础，早期的研究曾试图了解在代理理论方面的高管补偿和在不同形式的激励和公司业绩方面的探索链接。
这个文献假设，股东和经理人之间的委托代理关系被激发，公司将更有效率的运作，表现得更好。
公司治理的研究大多是基于通用模型——委托代理理论的概述，以及这一框架的核心前提是，股东和管理人员有不同的方法来了解公司的具体信息和广泛的利益分歧以及风险偏好。
因此，经理作为股东的代理人可以从事对自己有利的行为而损害股东财富的最大化。
大量的文献是基于这种直接的前提和建议来约束经理的机会主义行为，股东可以使用不同的公司治理机制，包括各种以股票为基础的奖励可以统一委托人和代理人的利益。
正如Jensen 和Murphy观察，“代理理论预测补偿政策将会以满足代理人的期望效用为主要目标。
股东的目标是使财富最大化；因此代理成本理论指出，总裁的薪酬政策将取决于股东财富的变化。
”影响积极组织结果的主要指标是付费业绩敏感性，但是这种“封闭系统”法主要是在英美的代理基础文献中找到，假定经理人激励与绩效之间存在普遍的联系，很少的关注在公司被嵌入的不同背景。
工程造价 项目成本管理 BIM和5D项目成本管理 外文文献翻译
文献出处：Smith P. BIM & the 5D project cost manager[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 119: 475-484.第一部分为译文，第二部分为原文。
默认格式：中文五号宋体，英文五号Times New Roma，行间距1.5倍。
BIM和5D项目成本管理摘要：本文探讨了项目成本管理专业人员在建筑行业建筑信息建模（BIM）实施与推进中的作用问题。
本文回顾了当前BIM行业的发展趋势和问题，并对澳大利亚的工料测量公司进行了详细的访谈。
BIM不仅涉及3D建模，并且还通常在诸如4D（时间），5D（成本）甚至6D（施工施工）的进一步维度中定义。
4D将3D对象模型中的信息和数据与项目编程和调度数据进行链接，促进了施工活动的仿真分析。
5D将所有这些信息与成本数据（如数量，时间表和价格）相集成。
6D表示在建筑的运行阶段可以使用的施工模型。
本文探讨了项目成本管理专业人员在所有项目阶段一体化参与的重要性，并将第五维度成为BIM环境中的关键角色-“5D项目成本管理”。
本文主要采用文献综述和行业采访等研究方法，并将通过专业项目成本管理公司确定领域的领先优势。
本文的结论是，现代项目成本管理最大的价值在于这些管理者们具备5D施工的能力，并能够利用仿真模型实时提供详细的5D估计和成本计划。
关键词：项目成本超支，项目成本管理，数量测量，成本工程1.引言在世界各地提供专业项目成本管理服务的主要专业对象是造价工程师，工料计量师，建筑经济学家和项目经理。
工料计量师是一个起源于英国的职业，是英联邦国家认可的专业职称。
造价工程师主要用于北美和南美，中国和欧洲部分地区。
建筑经济学家在一些欧洲国家和世界其他地区被用作服务的替代描述。
在其他地区，特别是在欧洲，这三个职称得不到承认，项目管理大部分由成本管理服务商承担，作为其服务套餐的一部分。
变动成本法及其应用外文文献翻译最新译文
变动成本法及其应用外文文献翻译最新译文This article discusses the variable cost method and its n in supply chain management。
The variable cost method is a cost accounting XXX。
This method is particularly useful in supply chain management because it allows for a more accurate understanding of the costs associated with each activity in the supply chain。
By using the variable cost method。
companies can identify areas where they can ce costs and XXX.One of the key benefits of the variable cost method is that it allows for a more accurate understanding of the costs associated with each activity in the supply chain。
This is because the method XXX。
For example。
if a company is producing a product。
the variable cost method would allocate the costs associated with the n process to that specific activity。
This XXX.Another benefit of the variable cost method is that it allows XXX in the supply chain。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
企业成本管理外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)译文：在价值链的成本控制下减少费用和获得更多的利润摘要：根据基于价值链的成本管理理念和基于价值的重要因素是必要的。
首先，必须有足够的资源，必须创造了有利的价值投资，同时还需要基于客户价值活动链，以确定他们的成本管理优势的价值链。
其次，消耗的资源必须尽量减少，使最小的运营成本价值链和确保成本优势是基于最大商业价值或利润，这是一种成本控制系统内部整个视图的创建和供应的具实践，它也是一种成本控制制度基于价值链，包括足够的控制和必要的资源投资价值的观点，创建和保持消费的资源到合理的水平，具有价值的观点主要对象的第一个因素是构造有利的价值链，从创造顾客价值开始；第二个因素是加强有利的价值链，从供应或生产客户价值开始。
因此它是一个新型的理念，去探索成本控制从整个视图的创建和供应的商品更盈利企业获得可持续的竞争优势。
关键词：成本控制，价值链，收益，支出，收入，成本会计1、介绍根据价值链理论，企业的目的是创造最大的顾客价值；和企业的竞争优势在于尽可能提供尽可能多的价值给他们的客户，作为低成本可能的。
这要求企业必须首先考虑他们是否能为顾客创造价值，和然后考虑在很长一段时间内如何创造它。
然而，竞争一直以“商品”（或“产品”）作为最直接的载体，因此，传统的成本控制方法主要集中在对“产品”和生产流程的过程。
很显然，这不能解决企业的问题，企业是否或如何能为客户创造价值。
换句话说，这至少不能从根本上解决它。
因此，企业必须首先投入足够的资源，以便他们能够创建客户值取向，然后提供它以最少的资源费用。
所以在整个视图中对价值创造和提供整体的观点来控制成本，它可以为客户提供完美的动力和操作运行机制运行成本的控制，也可以从根本上彻底克服了传统的成本控制方法的缺点，解决了无法控制的创造和供应不足的真正价值。
基于此，本文试图从创作的整体观讨论成本控制提供价值并探讨实现良性循环的策略，也就是说，“创造价值投资成本供应价值创造价值”。
2、成本及其控制的基于价值链理念2.1基于价值链的成本观念根据价值链理论，如果企业是要被客户接受，它必须创造和提供能满足其客户的价值。
因此，成本（价值或资源支付费用）这不离为创造和提供顾客价值的活动，其活动的价值链。
因此，我们应该从价值链角度看成本的重要。
因此，根据基于价值链的成本的概念，成本有三层含义：首先，投资资源；其次，资源消耗；第三，投资时间和资源消耗。
虽然成本是指相同的价值创造过程中产生的牺牲，从不同角度扫描的成本，它的意义和作用是完全不同的。
因此，基于价值链的控制它提供了强大的支持成本理论，并使它有可能控制企业的实践操作。
根据价值链理论，企业，获得“持续竞争优势”，应该首先构建价值链，创造客户价值，实现企业的基础目的，这是赢得客户的基本。
一方面，企业必须投入资源创建客户价值；另一方面，创造价值的活动时也消耗资源，提供客户价值（产品或服务）。
同时，在整个价值链的同时，从纵向和横向价值链关系看活动构成的价值链的各个环节。
事实上，“时间链”，这种意味着两件事：首先，从价值创造活动的物理的角度来看，价值的操作链需要时间（简称，“时间消费观”）；其次，从关系的角度价值链的各个环节来看，时间本身是一种资源的项目（简称，“时间投资观”）。
2.2基于价值链的成本控制的思想基于价值链的成本控制思路是“基于成本控制的”三元和二元价值”。
即，它是基于投资和资源消耗和成本控制的思想时间链。
因此，从价值链的构建和运行看，基于成本控制的思想价值链具有双重性质。
首先，它是必要的控制，确保有足够的资源投入为客户创造价值（代表更多的价值和高质量的产品）。
其次，它是必要的保证对它是有必要的投资的前提下，资源要消耗的最低水平和必要的资源，以提供尽可能多的顾客价值（代表更多的利润低成本）。
此外，从投资的时间和非时间资源消耗的角度来看，思想对基于价值链的成本控制具有''三维控制成本”，即，投资和消费时间和非时间资源。
因此，在本质上，基于价值的成本控制的思想供应链成本控制具有“二元和三元”。
2.3基于价值创造和供应的双重视角的成本控制在本质上，顾客价值是在使用产品的客户满意度。
这包括基于价值链的同时赚取更多的收入和降低成本费用的控制满意度（以定量的方式，例如：性能）和精神上的满足（仅在定性的方式）。
客户认可的价值产品，他们购买（客户价值）包括至少在三个方面。
首先是产品的性能，二是顾客使用产品的成本和第三是产品的质量。
性能（即基本功能）的产品主要取决于产品的独特性，它主要取决于投资资源的使用成本的程度。
产品取决于其性能和质量。
它主要取决于产品的设计，因此，也就在资源的投入程度。
质量主要取决于产品的设计和制造。
因此，投资资源的投入程度有密切的关系。
一般来说，客户价值是指这些客户愿意支付的上述三方面的产品的价值。
然而，从制造过程或活动链的观点，在活动中，任何产品生产需要消耗的资源，资源的消耗量对间接的影响购买价格，在为产品支付客户的直接费用时，如果资源消耗低，对客户的直接费用低，这将对所提供的总价值会直接影响价值链。
然而，在创造价值的人会对资源的消耗产生更直接的影响，（即价值链机械手）。
显然，如果消耗少，剩余价值（利润）更少。
根据基于价值链的成本控制的思想，基于价值链的成本是投资资源旨在通过价值链创造客户价值。
这也是对资源的消耗其目的是提供顾客价值。
因此，从成本，实质意义，是一种资源（创造顾客价值的资源）。
基于价值链的成本控制思路有两个目的。
第一是确保资源的投资是必要的和足够的价值链创造必要的顾客价值。
第二是确保资源的消耗是尽可能低，价值链可以提供价值的客户。
很明显，成本基于价值链的优势有两方面：首先，必须投入足够的资源创造价值基于顾客价值优势；其次，资源消耗，必须尽可能降低建立基于企业价值最大化的剩余或利润的成本优势。
因此，成本控制在创造价值和供应的整体观实际上是一种成本控制这两者并重赚取收入和削减开支。
3、为赚取更多的基于价值链的成本控制的基本思想收入和减少支出根据价值链理论，成本可以作为获取利润或创建资源和提供顾客价值。
因此，赚取更多的收入可以提高收益和降低费用使这些收益最大化。
前者在于它是必要的，确保有足够的投资资源，确保资源的合理消费对后者的控制要求。
3.1基于价值链的成本控制从赚取更多的收入，必要的和足够的控制资源投资关于创造价值，基于价值链的成本控制首先要确保有在资源足够的投资。
然后一个价值链构建具有竞争优势，（即投资资源，注重如何打造核心竞争力）。
最后，价值链是独一无二的。
不能违背传统的成本控制观念。
3.1.1 基本含义基于价值链的成本控制从赚取更多的收入有两层含义。
首先是保证资源是必要的投资，构建价值链是目的。
二是确保足够的投资资源。
这些意义的重要性是双重的。
一方面，在资源的投资应确保价值链战略优势（例如汽车制造企业必须投入足够的资源，以确保它处于汽车产业链中的一个有利的位置上）。
另一方面，在资源投入要构建的有利的价值链利润公司。
例如，在研发一个汽车制造企业的投资时，应确保它可以不断的开发新的技术和产品。
3.1.2 控制准则（1）顾客价值的标准。
客户价值的标准是从客户价值链的构建需求，具有竞争优势或是从其他公司的历史，价值链不同可以供应更多的顾客价值。
例如，建立一个新的生产线，可生产大尺寸液晶电视，一在资源电视企业的投资应确保有明显的液晶电视优于别人。
否则不良资产存量将很快增长。
这是对国有企业传统悲剧的教训。
（2）核心竞争力的标准。
核心能力的标准是，在资源的投资以保证价值链，企业构建核心竞争力，比如，汽车企业建立一个新的汽车制造厂。
在这种情况下，最重要的是没有建立一个先进的生产线，以确保产品是相当灵活的，即市场，需求，利益，企业的产品可以很好地适应了市场的需求。
否则，其有形和无形的资产将会贬值，因为他们不能满足及时为客户创造价值。
（3）标准的核心产品。
核心产品的标准是，在资源的投资应确保企业的核心能力可以成为其核心产品。
飞跃从核心能力的核心产品的关键是内部管理的资本运营战略。
例如，制冷具有核心竞争力的企业不能设施制造所有类型的冰箱，但它应该只生产的产品可以代表或显示自己的核心竞争力。
在这种方式下，企业会有相对竞争优势。
3.1.3控制方式我们可以选择基于上述控制标准控制方法。
首先，企业可以采取SWOT等方法来定位其战略价值链。
因此，其投资的重点和规模可以决定的。
其次，企业可以识别自身的核心竞争力，根据三个标准来确定自己的核心能力。
因此企业应确保在建立和维持其投资核心能力是足够的。
此后，在价值链的运作过程中，企业应支付的专注于核心竞争力的变化，确保有足够的投资。
具体而言，本企业可以采用ERP，业务流程再造，并加强其核心竞争力的其他方法。
最后，企业可以采用计算机集成制造系统，目标成本，并确保核心产品的生产方法。
3.2 基于节支，控制合理的价值链成本控制消费从价值的供给和创造价值的途径出发，基于价值的成本控制的关键链是降低资源消耗，使价值链的经营成本是最低的，而价值供应最。
本质上，它的思想从传统的成本控制的不同。
它的目的是在控制在创造顾客价值的前提下，资源的合理消费。
3.2.1 基本含义基于顾客价值的生产或提供合理化的方法，目的是确定对价值链在保证客户价值的供应的基础上最小的资源消耗。
因此，成本控制涉及到优化价值链而不是简单地减少消费的观念。
因此，保持合理的资源消耗意味着三件事。
首先，它是必要的减少基于整个企业价值链的资源消耗。
其次，它是必要的减少投资和基于单元或价值链环节的资源消耗。
第三，本最重要的是资源投入的充足性和资源消耗的合理化基于价值链的优化。
例如，如果没有足够的在制备曲投资正式的制造程序，有一个低的材料的质量，因此，它可能会增加生产的后续制造过程的成本（例如一个煤矿的投资挖掘进程程序是不足以满足采矿工艺的要求，这会影响它的成本。
否则它会引起关闭）。
3.2.2 控制标准（1）有利的标准成本优势。
成本标准是基于成本领先的标准战略。
这意味着企业的价值链整体成本具有相对竞争优势。
即，它的整个价值链的成本低于其他同类企业。
例如，如果一个生产线汽车业务是其竞争对手的同时，应确保其成本不高于竞争对手，但这并不意味着较低的，更好的。
（2）优势的价值链的标准。
一个有利的价值链是一个具有核心竞争力。
因此基于一个有利的价值链成本控制是以最小的成本消耗的构建一个有利的价值链的基础，换句话说，它意味着成本最小化消耗价值链的分解与整合的基础。
作为上述汽车业务，其成本控制要确保成本消耗于独特的单位和价值链环节的基础上最低的。
（3）可追溯的标准。
这意味着成本的每一项可以追溯到一个特定的或可控成本在基于价值链的成本控制过程中的驱动程序。