行为金融学
合集下载
相关主题
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2.1 Beliefs-Others
Availability biases. When judging the probability of an event – the likelihood of getting mugged in Chicago, say – people often search their memories for relevant information. While this is a perfectly sensible procedure, it can produce biased estimates because not all memories are equally retrievable or“available”. More recent events and more salient events – the mugging of a close friend, say – will weigh more heavily and distort the estimate.
United Nations’ countries that are African. They were asked whether their guess was higher or lower than a randomly generated number between 0 and 100. Their subsequent estimates were significantly affected by the initial random number. Those who were asked to compare their estimate to 10, subsequently estimated 25%, while those who compared to 60, estimated 45%.
2.1 Beliefs- ‘O’ and ‘O’
Overconfidence. Extensive evidence shows that people are overconfident in their judgments. First, the confidence intervals people assign to their estimates of quantities are far too narrow. Their 98% confidence intervals, for example, include the true quantity only about 60% of the time. Second, people are poorly calibrated when estimating probabilities. Events they think are certain to occur actually occur only around 80% of the time, and events they deem impossible occur approximately 20% of the time. Optimism and wishful thinking Typically, over 90% of those surveyed think they are above average in such domains as driving skill, ability to get along with people and sense of humor. They also predict that tasks will be completed much sooner than they actually are.
A SURVEY OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE
主讲人:杨皓(计算机与控制工程学院)
Contents
1 Limits to arbitrage 2 Psychology
3 Application: The aggregate stock market
4 Application: The cross-section of average returns 5 Application: Closed-end funds and comovement 6 Application: Investor behavior 7 Application: Corporate finance
wenku.baidu.com
1.1 Limits to arbitrage
1.2 Theory of the limiting
Fundamental risk: The substitute securities are rarely perfect .
Noise trader risk: The pessimistic investors causing Ford to be undervalued in the first place become even more pessimistic, lowering its price even further. In particular types of noise trading, arbitrageurs may prefer to trade in the same direction as the noise traders, thereby exacerbating the mispricing, rather than against them.
2.1 Beliefs-Others
Belief perseverance. Once people have formed an opinion, they cling to it too tightly and for too long. First, people are reluctant to search for evidence that contradicts their beliefs. Second, even if they find such evidence, they treat it with excessive skepticism. Anchoring(沉锚效应). When forming estimates, people often start with some initial, possibly arbitrary value, and then adjust away from it. Subjects were asked to estimate the percentage of
2.1 Beliefs-Representativeness
2.1 Beliefs-Conservatism
There are two urns, one containing 3 blue balls and 7 red ones, and the other containing 7 blue balls and 3 red ones. A random draw of 12 balls, with replacement, from one of the urns yields 8 reds and 4 blues. What is the probability the draw was made from the first urn?
1.3 Evidence of the limiting
In 1907,Royal Dutch and Shell Transport, at the time completely independent companies, merge their interests on a 60:40 basis while remaining separate entites.
1.3 Evidence of the limiting
There are fundamental risk , noise trader risk and implementation costs in exploiting the mispricing.
2. Psychology
In order to say more about the structure of these deviations, behavioral models often assume a specific form of irrationality. Beliefs Overconfidence Optimism and wishful thinking Representativeness Conservatism Belief perseverance Anchoring Availability biases Preferences Prospect theory(前景理论) Ambiguity aversion(模糊厌恶)
8 Conclusion
Introduction
1、In the traditional finance paradigm, financial markets using models in which agents are “rational”. Rationality means two things : First, when they receive new information, agents update their beliefs Correctly, in the manner described by Bayes’law. Second, given their beliefs, agents make choices that are normatively acceptable, in the sense that they are consistent with Savage’s notion of Subjective Expected Utility(SEU). 2、This framework cannot solve the basic facts about the aggregate stock market, the cross-section of average returns and individual trading behavior. 3、Behavioral finance is a new approach to financial markets that has emerged, at least in part , in response to the difficulties faced by the traditional paradigm.
2.2.1 Prospect theory
2.2.1 Prospect theory
2.2.2 Ambiguity aversion
There are two urns, 1 and 2. Urn 2 contains a total of 100 balls, 50 red and 50 blue. Urn 1 also contains 100 balls, a mix of red and blue(we do not know). Subjects are asked to choose one of the following two gambles, each of which involves a possible payment of $100, depending on the color of a ball drawn at random from the relevant urn. a1 : a ball is drawn from Urn 1, $100 if red, $0 if blue a2 : a ball is drawn from Urn 2, $100 if red, $0 if blue b1 : a ball is drawn from Urn 1, $100 if blue, $0 if red b2 : a ball is drawn from Urn 2, $100 if blue, $0 if red a2>a1 and b2>b1
The correct answer is 0.97, most people estimate a number around 0.7. It appears that if a data sample is representative of an underlying model, then people overweight the data. However, if the data is not representative of any salient model, people rely too much on their priors.