比较政治学论文,英文版
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Comparison of the methodology of Political Science
Durkheim once pointed out that Gleichschaltung is extremely important for Sociology .because Sociology may not use the experimentation to study its goal.The argument of Sociology has to turn to Gleichschaltung.just On account of lacking firm theory and Methodology basis,just like cot and Mou-nier said:”the foundation of some Gleichschaltung has been distorted ..For all kinds of purpose,the amount of survey in different countries are difficult to explain the criticism from epistemoloqical angle .If these survey mainly aim to acquire some data from the social background and they set out to a comparison among them ,as a result,a basic principle would be ignored. in other word, the various phenomenon integrity principle should be noticed . Each social reality has itself attribute ,which comes from the social integrity. only in the social intergrity ,social phenomenon can gain its position . It will Lose any social significance if we see a social phenomenon alone.”
One:the standard of Rechtsvergleichung
Some scholars consider how to put the issue of rechtsvergleichuang to use in all subjects rightly. But in essence, public opinion is always around an assumption whether the right and the wrong science can be mentioned in the same breath or not. Some “scholars”
sincerely believe in it and attempt to persuade the public to believe
science that it is nothing more than a method of experiment. On the contrary , the specialists of the humanities hold an opposite attitude on it. This contradiction is similar to the scence between natural science and geisteswissenschaften seen by Dilthey . The two opinions spread the same view: In one hand, there exists precise ,objectivity strong science with universal meaning .in other hand ,there still have not exact, homiletic knowledge with prejudice, similarly a mixture which is between philosophy and ideology. The distinction method has been argued for a long time .and also out of the sight of the public. In one hand ,the methodoiogy of the humanities become more and more perfect .it can turn to Measurement Technique if necessary ,for this reason,it becomes more rigorous;
.On the other hand , as G.Fourez has pointed out , modern Epistemology finally find that the so called absolute objectivity is just a bait . As the mutual approach of the different subjects , people realize that the reason resulting in separating subjects lies in not the difference in nature , but in respective objective and maturity
From our respective, science is merely a way to obtain the knowledge of the world among the competition of philosophy , theology etc .It must prove the theory through the fact that is the characteristic of science. Foucaulr has said that the specific performance of science is each subject with its target scope, a set of method ,a set of condescension proposal ,a set of rules and definition. in addition, the