Gartner项目组合管理软件的魔方图

合集下载

PMP十五至尊图

PMP十五至尊图

十五至尊图过程名称输入工具与技术输出制定项目章程1.项目工作说明书2.商业论证3.协议4.事业环境因素5.组织过程资产1.专家判断2.引导技术1.项目章程制定项目管理计划1.项目章程2.其他过程的输出3.事业环境因素4.组织过程资产1.专家判断2.引导技术1.项目管理计划指导与管理项目工作1.项目管理计划2.批准的变更请求3.事业环境因素4.组织过程资产1.专家判断2.项目管理信息系统3.会议1.可交付的成果2.工作绩效数据3.变更请求4.项目管理计划更新5.项目文件更新监控项目工作1.项目管理计划2.进度预测3.成本预测4.确认的变更5.工作绩效信息6.事业环境因素7.组织过程资产1.专家判断2.分析技术3.项目管理信息系统4.会议1.变更请求2.工作绩效报告3.项目管理计划更新4.项目文件更新实施整体变更控制1.项目管理计划2.工作绩效报告3.变更请求4.事业环境因素5.组织过程资产1.专家判断2.会议3.变更控制工具1.批准的变更请求2.变更日志3.项目管理计划4.项目文件更新结束项目或阶段1.项目管理计划2.验收的可交付成果3.组织过程资产1.专家判断2.分析技术3.会议1.最终产品、服务或成果移交2.组织过程资产更新(包括项目档案、收尾文件、历史信息)十五至尊图---项目整体管理。

研发团队 人员配置模型 gartner-概述说明以及解释

研发团队 人员配置模型 gartner-概述说明以及解释

研发团队人员配置模型gartner-概述说明以及解释1.引言1.1 概述人员配置模型是指在研发团队中,根据不同的任务和需求,合理分配和配置人员的一种方法或系统。

合理的人员配置对于提高团队的效率、优化资源利用以及实现项目目标至关重要。

在研发过程中,由于不同的项目或任务可能存在不同的技术需求和资源限制,因此需要采取科学有效的方法来配置团队人员,以满足项目的要求并确保项目的成功。

本文将介绍Gartner研发团队人员配置模型,该模型由Gartner公司提出并广泛应用于各类研发组织。

Gartner研发团队人员配置模型基于多年的实践和研究,并结合了行业的最佳实践和专业知识。

该模型通过对任务复杂度、技能需求、团队规模以及人员互操作性等因素的综合考虑,确定了最佳的人员配置方案。

在本文中,我们将详细介绍Gartner研发团队人员配置模型的要点和关键指标,并解释其作用和优势。

同时,我们还将展望人员配置模型在未来的发展趋势,以适应日益变化和复杂的研发环境。

通过阅读本文,读者将对人员配置模型有一个清晰的认识,并了解如何应用该模型来优化研发团队的人员配置,提高工作效率和项目成功率。

同时,本文也将为读者提供一些思考和参考,以帮助他们在实践中更好地应用人员配置模型,促进研发团队的持续改进和发展。

1.2文章结构1.2 文章结构本文主要通过介绍研发团队人员配置模型的定义与重要性,以及Gartner研发团队人员配置模型的介绍,旨在总结人员配置模型的作用与优势,并展望未来的发展趋势。

首先,在引言部分,概述了本文的主题和目的。

随后,在正文部分,将会详细阐述人员配置模型的定义与重要性,以及介绍Gartner研发团队人员配置模型。

在正文的最后,将会有一个结论部分,总结人员配置模型的作用与优势,并对未来的发展趋势进行展望。

整篇文章的结构清晰,逻辑性强。

通过引言部分的概述,读者可以了解文章的主题和目的,为后续内容打下基础。

接下来,在正文部分,将对人员配置模型的定义与重要性进行详细介绍,读者可以了解到为什么人员配置模型在研发团队中十分重要。

项目管理矩阵图

项目管理矩阵图

项目管理矩阵图1.甘特图:这可能是最知名的项目管理图表了,以提出者亨利·L·甘特(Henrry L. Ganntt)先生的名字命名,横轴表示时间,纵轴表示项目,线条表示期间计划和实际完成情况,直观表明计划何时进行,进展与要求的对比,便于管理者弄清项目的剩余人物,评估工作进度,用Project、Excel来制作;2.燃尽图:在项目完成之前,对需要完成的工作的一种可视化表示。

燃尽图有一个Y轴(工作)和X轴(时间)。

该图表是一个向下的曲线,随着剩余工作的完成,“烧尽”至零。

互联网开发项目中通常情况下使用白板来制作,一边是项目进度、一边是人员分工的贴纸,每天上班或下班前会对人员分工贴纸或问题做一个记录和解决;3.WBS(工作结构)分解图:把一个项目,按一定的原则分解,项目分解成任务,任务再分解成一项项工作,再把一项项工作分配到每个人的日常活动中,直到分解不下去为止。

即:项目→任务→工作→日常活动。

工作分解结构以可交付成果为导向,对项目要素进行的分组,它归纳和定义了项目的整个工作范围,每下降一层代表对项目工作的更详细定义。

WBS总是处于计划过程的中心,也是制定进度计划、资源需求、成本预算、风险管理计划和采购计划等的重要基础,通常我们用Excel、Visio/亿图、Xmind/Mindmanger来制作;4.HOQ:用于定义顾客预期和公司能力之间的关系。

尽管这个图形看起来很复杂,但是质量屋图可以展示出更多的信息和比较更多的数据,通常情况下使用Visio/亿图制作,都有内置的模板可以直接制作。

5.RACI图:这个图表最大的作用就是在项目进行的过程中,用于记录不同角色之间的责任,其中R代表负责执行的人,A代表批准的人、C代表可以完成项目的人员、I代表应该被通知的人,通常使用Excel、Visio/亿图来制作;6.矩阵组织图:把按职能划分的部门和按产品(或项目、服务等)划分的部门结合起来组成一个矩阵,是同一名员工既同原职能部门保持组织与业务上的联系,又参加产品或项目小组的工作的一种结构,通常使用Excel、Visio/亿图来制作;7.PERT(计划评审技术)图:利用网络分析制定计划以及对计划予以评价的技术。

gartner 企业风险管理技术成熟度曲线

gartner 企业风险管理技术成熟度曲线

gartner 企业风险管理技术成熟度曲线
Gartner企业风险管理技术成熟度曲线是Gartner公司提出的一种框架,用于评估和比较企业在风险管理领域的技术采用成熟度。

该曲线将企业的技术成熟度分为五个不同的阶段,涵盖了从基础阶段到创新阶段的不同程度的成熟度。

以下是Gartner企业风险管理技术成熟度曲线的五个阶段:
1. 初始阶段(Nascent Stage):企业在此阶段尚未部署综合的风险管理解决方案,可能只关注某一特定领域的风险管理,如合规性或安全性。

2. 基本阶段(Foundational Stage):企业在此阶段开始采用基本的风险管理技术工具和方法,但仍然缺乏一种一致的方法和框架来管理和整合不同领域的风险。

3. 可寻址阶段(Addressable Stage):企业在此阶段已经采用了一些综合的风险管理解决方案,并且能够识别和评估不同领域的风险。

但仍然需要更多的自动化和整合来提高效率和准确性。

4. 整合阶段(Integrated Stage):企业在此阶段已经实现了不同领域风险的整合,并且能够更好地评估和管理全面的风险。

此时企业可能已经采用了先进的技术工具和方法,如风险评估模型和数据分析。

5. 创新阶段(Innovative Stage):企业在此阶段已经对风险管
理进行了创新,采用了前沿的技术和方法,并且能够预测和应对潜在的未知风险。

这些企业通常是领导者,在风险管理领域拥有竞争优势。

Gartner企业风险管理技术成熟度曲线可以帮助企业了解自身在风险管理技术方面的成熟度,并为企业提供指引和建议,帮助它们提升风险管理的能力和效果。

GARTNER项目组合管理软件的魔方图英文

GARTNER项目组合管理软件的魔方图英文

Gartner项目组合管理软件的魔方图Magic Quadrant for Project Portfolio Management, 2003Matt LightDocument Type: Research NoteNote Number: M-20-2777Applications for project portfolio and resource management can boost team performance, and enable IT management and others to access real-time data via dashboards for prioritization and rapid decision making.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------What You Need to KnowHeightened interest in integrated project portfolio management solutions has sustained this market through hard times. By broadening its view of project management to an organizational governance context, IT management can increasingly address portfolios of projects, priorities, resources and more.AnalysisStrategic Planning AssumptionsBy 2006, more than 50 percent of all project portfolio management functions will be packaged as flexibly configurable, modular Web services (0.6 probability).By 2006, at least 50 percent of IS organizations will have adopted a mix of project portfolio management application services for managing team collaboration, allocating resources, and tracking utilization and costs (0.7 probability).Enterprises will continue to reduce the number of tools needed to manage IT and other project portfolios, in part to provide quicker visibility via direct rollup and analysis of portfolio data. Enterprises delivering projects large and small have long blended tools and manual solutions to allocate resources, schedule activities and milestones, track progress, share project-related documents, control project risks and otherwise manage their project portfolios (see "Ways to Speed Up Projects in the Real-Time Enterprise"). We believe that, during the next five years, project portfolio management (PPM) functions will be increasingly consolidated in flexible and configurable "smart suites" of PPM Web services.A smart enterprise suite can extend platforms to create specialized applications that integrate analytical, business and content management application functionalities, which is precisely what's happening with PPM packages (see >"The Future of the Smart Enterprise Suite"). This trend has been slowly gaining momentum, inhibited by market conditions and the resulting constraints on R&D. Furthermore, pricing pressures have mounted because of the tough PPM market (as well as competition from the Microsoft Project product line), while growth rates for most vendors have decreased or stopped altogether.As noted last year (see "2002 Project/Resource Management Magic Quadrant), application vendors from other areas have also been entering the market and contributing to growth in this space. Since 3Q02, the vendors of the more-integrated PPM solutions have struggled, and the competition is heating up (see Figure 1 and Note 1).Figure 1The PPM Magic QuadrantSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)Note 1Evaluation CriteriaAbility to ExecuteVendor viabilityManagement teamTrack record in delivery and supportFunctional depthSupport capabilitySales and marketingCompleteness of VisionVision of technology and the marketResourcing (including external)Consulting/service commitmentPackage breadthPlatform, database and ERP supportTeam collaboration featuresIS organization requirementsVendors' vision foci differ. Some, such as the enterprise resource planning (ERP) providers, initially focused on project cost accounting, then added planning, resourcing and other PPM features. Others (Primavera Systems, for example) focused first on the latter set of functions, enabling project cost management and exporting cost accounting data to an ERP back end, and later added ways to collect nonproject costs, such as work requests. Although approaching PPM requirements with different strengths, these applications can providereliable IT project and service status data, which was formerly available only in fragments (for example, in such static documents as time reports or resource plans in Excel).In assembling a complete solution, PPM packages often provide integration to address gaps or weaknesses in functionality. Another example of integration is the common dependence on Microsoft Project, while focusing on portfolio analysis, tracking, resourcing, costing, collaboration or other features and offering project planning (such as Gantt charts) for those situations when more-detailed scheduling (in Microsoft Project or alternative schedulers) is not required (see Figure 2).Figure 2PPM: Evolution of an Application SuiteSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)During the past year, developments in the PPM market have included the growing importance of portfolio features — hence, our reference to it as project portfolio management, rather than project/resource management (although resource profiling, leveling and so forth remain significant). IBM has been a growing presence in this market, as well as at its fringes; it acquired Rational Software last year, as well as PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Consulting, including its Summit Ascendant product line, which features tools, IT process support and project management methodology.More directly in the PPM space, IBM has invested in Systemcorp and has assisted in the development of Systemcorp's Enterprise PM Office, which shows an accurate view of market requirements, with an effective breadth of functionality that includes full scheduling, resourcing, and time and expense reporting. Service request management and defect-tracking features further support the needs of IS organizations. Scope management features enable users to integrate project requirements to plan and automate project document management, including version control and the ability to link documents to any level of a work breakdown structure.Built in a Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) framework, PM Office's portal approach enables simpler user configurations than previous releases and also features a native Enterprise Dashboard, with hundreds of C-level stored procedures, including many for portfolio reporting. Previously focused on IBM's DB2 database platform, PM Office now directly supports the Oracle database as well.An emerging group of "portfolio analysis" vendors has begun offering solutions for analyzing IT investments and assets, some (such as Pacific Edge Software) as part of PPM product lines (see "The Gartner Portfolio Management Tool for IT Investment"). Other offerings, although short of being PPM products (see Note 2), are moving to offer planning, resourcing and other features that approach the PPM market. Among these emerging tools is Artemis International Solutions' PortfolioDirector (see "Artemis PortfolioDirector for Managing IT Investments"), which has been a bright spot for Artemis in recent years as the company has struggled to put its financial challenges behind it.Note 2PPM Processes for Application SupportA PPM application addresses most of the nine processes defined by the Project Management Institute's Project Management Book of Knowledge: project scope management, time management (that is, planning or scheduling), cost management, resource management, quality management, project communications management, project risk management and project procurement management. The ninth area enables the integration of these processes, such as for pipeline or other analytics. (See "Project Portfolio Management (PPM) Applications: Perspective.")With a profitable quarter to end 2002 (based largely on PortfolioDirector momentum and cost cutting), Artemis continues to correct its cost structure after acquiring the bulk of its joint ventures worldwide. With continued strength in product revenue in Europe, any Artemis comeback is likely to begin there.Another important portfolio analysis tool is ProSight, an innovative solution that entered the American market a few years ago. Using a partnering strategy that involved such vendors as Changepoint, Evolve, PeopleSoft and PlanView, the ProSight tool enabled vendors to extend their offerings. These partners have typically developed competing solutions. ProSight has deepened its tool, adding "playbooks" of dashboards, scorecards, pick lists and forms to target such procedures as IT service-level management, system retirement, project prioritization and IT inventory analysis.Other notable portfolio analysis tools come from Portfolio DecisionWare (an AXS-One/Tivity partner) and United Management Technologies, which has developed StratFrames. Both also offer consulting services as a major part of their businesses. In addition, ProSight has strategically partnered with Fujitsu Consulting for consulting services in the portfolio management space. Lawson Software and Changepoint have similar strategic partnerships with Deloitte & Touche, and PeopleSoft has partnered with Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (CGE&Y).Since 2Q01, Evolve has increasingly marketed outside its initial professional services administration (PSA) niche. In addition to product development, the vendor has targeted IS organizations, especially with its Evolve 6 Portfolio Management version, which was released in late 2002. In March, Evolve introduced its work request management solution, which is similar to that offered by PlanView and Changepoint. These capabilities were among the features that caused Primavera to acquire the chronically unprofitable Evolve for $13million in March 2003 (see "Primavera to Acquire Evolve, Expand Project Management Line").In the IT and application management space, Kintana — slated for acquisition this quarter by Mercury Interactive — has rounded out its product line during the last 12 to 18 months, with demand, portfolio, project, program and time management tools grouped under the banner of "IT Governance." At the same time, Rational's Project Console dashboard has gained traction in Rational's user base, although it falls short of being a PPM product.Along the same lines, PlanView has introduced a set of organizational governance processes called "Prisms," which it has built into its PlanView Portfolio Management 7.3 solution, which was launched at Gartner's Spring Symposium in March. The 11 Prisms are divided into three categories: investments, projects and service. They include a configurable, prepopulated database of attributes and stage gates for different initiatives (such as models for a business investment planning effort, a major development project or a production system support service).Similarly, Changepoint has pursued a vision blending IT portfolio management with resource and project planning and tracking, resulting in a partnership with Deloitte & Touche marketing a "CIO Portal." Now in v.8, the Changepoint product has been rebuilt on .NET, with added Oracle database support, and it has been converted to Unicode for ease of translation (a Spanish language version has also been added). This, along with ongoing enhancement of its request management/help desk-style features, has increased the proportion of Changepoint's internal corporate IT customers and prospects tomore than 50 percent, while its professional service target market has slowed purchases.Microsoft remains a strong presence in the marketplace with its Microsoft Project product line, which features MSP Standard, Professional, Server and Web Access (see "Got a Plan? Microsoft Project 2002 Preview") and provides an effective PPM solution in the Windows and SQL Server environments. Revenue growth for this product line has enabled additional R&D, which has yielded a Microsoft Project 2003 release that is due in the fall, enhancing synergies with other Microsoft technologies, including Windows Sharepoint Services, Office and Outlook. Continued work with Microsoft Solution Partners to address implementation issues provides valuable experience in addressing enterprise needs.ERP II vendors continue to target the space, both defensively (to prevent PPM "midoffice" vendors from expanding their enterprise footprints) and offensively, with PPM products or features packaged with parts of their application platforms to address PPM market requirements. Although initially offered to extend their implementations' project accounting and reporting functionality, some have done significant acquisitions and development.Lawson's offering — enhancing its 2001 acquisition of the XML-based Account4 PSA technology — now features portfolio analysis, with consulting support from Answerthink. Its Service Automation PPM product directly supports SOP 98-1 reporting of application development costs with guidelines for expensing vs. capitalization. Version 5.1's Smart Notification monitors data from Lawson orexternal systems, including the Web, to provide alerts (such as for schedule overruns) via a variety of devices.Oracle's new PPM solution, which was introduced in June 2003, extends its established Oracle Projects module (formerly focused on project costing and billing, with some recent resourcing features) with three new products: Project Management, for building work plans, controlling project issues and changes and tracking progress; Project Collaboration, with a project "workspace" for managing and enabling real-time issue resolution; and Project Intelligence, for analyzing project data.PeopleSoft also has an established project accounting module, which has been extended in recent years with resource management and T&E in its Enterprise Service Automation (ESA) offering. This also features a Contracts module and a Services Procurement module, which PeopleSoft hopes to leverage if greater demand for IT services accompanies an economic recovery. With consulting partner CGE&Y, it also offers CIO OneSource, a combined PPM product/service for IT.SAP is approaching the market with new offerings that may challenge the competition next year: xRPM, a "cross app" for resource and program management that is positioned as a product targeting internal R&D or IS organizations, and SAP Professional Services, a customer relationship management (CRM) solution. Similarly, Denmark-based Maconomy offers vertically differentiated solutions with product templates that target marketing/advertising agencies, audit/tax consulting and research organizations, although they do not target internal IT. Epicor Software does not specifically target IT either, although its Epicor for Service Enterprises software isadaptable, and it has retooled its product line for Web services delivery via its Internet Component Architecture.Another deal of note was Scitor's spin-off last August of its tool business as Sciforma. Its established PS Suite extends advanced planning, tracking and multiproject resource leveling via its Project Communicator (which includes Inform, Objects and Admin modules). Sciforma's new PS Next will go further with workforce skill and capacity management and the ability to track hours against budgets, along with state-of-the-art project planning and scheduling. We expect PS Next's new J2EE framework pricing to drive PPM pricing of flexible, configurable Web services.With another round of investment ($10.5 million in February) and a return to profitability, a stabilized Niku may be poised to take advantage of potential economic rebounds in 2004. On the product front, Niku 6.1 shipped in 2Q03, featuring portlets and streamlined navigation of its five main modules — Niku Projects, Portfolio Manager, Resource Planner, Financial Manager and Niku Workbench —effectively getting the product in shape. Among its new and upgraded Niku 6 customers are several implementations of more than 2,000 users (including team members reporting time/status).Business Engine's v.5 release deepens its budget management, embeds Microsoft Project, adds more online analytical processing (OLAP) cubes for financial management and provides new features for external contractor management. The company has had key implementations at Deutsche Bank, Merrill-Lynch and Delphi Automotive, and each deployment exceeds 5,000 users. Tenrox also embeds Microsoft Project for synchronization without import-export,has a strong focus on T&E and billing, and features an effective workflow tool reminiscent of process-modeling tools offered by ERP vendors.There is a significant PPM niche market for enterprises leveraging the IBM/Lotus Domino platform for PPM purposes. Automation Centre offers TrackerSuite, featuring resource management, time-tracking Domino-based project collaboration, document management and workflow. Customers include DuPont and American Electric Power. Automation Centre also offers a Microsoft-based product. Similarly, Eden Communications leverages Domino with its ProjecTrak family of products. It targets IS with a bug tracker, help desk, asset management and software designer module, among others. Genius Project from the European (Swiss-based) company Genius Inside features risk and simulation modules.Key IssuesWhat project management tools, processes and techniques are required for delivering high-quality, on-time and on-budget applications?How will ERP II vendors and markets evolve?How will enterprises improve the operational efficiency of theire-workplace infrastructures during the next five years?How should project/process management groups for an application development organization be set up, and with what support tools? What tools and technologies will enable enterprises to operate in real time?Acronym KeyCGE&Y Cap Gemini Ernst & YoungCRM customer relationship managementEPM Enterprise Project ManagementERP enterprise resource planningESA Enterprise Service AutomationJ2EE Java 2 Platform, Enterprise EditionOLAP online analytical processingPPM project portfolio managementPSA professional services administrationPwC PricewaterhouseCoopersReturn to Top--------------------------------------------------------------------------------© 2003 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.。

安全运维外包服务(MSS)

安全运维外包服务(MSS)

根据风险管理的概念,我们知道风险可以有4种结果:接受、降低、避免和转移。

信息系统的安全风险管理相同,将安全运维外包即是风险转移的有效手段。

安全运维外包即是将自己业务系统的安全运维工作完全外包给外部专业的安全服务供应商,自己不再承担系统的安全运维工作。

这种方式在国外称之为Outsourcing Managed Security Services,有时直接称管理安全服务(MSS,Managed Security Services),而外部的专业安全服务供应商则称之为MSSP(Managed Security Services Provider)。

国外MSS已经是非常普遍的一种安全服务模式。

安全运维外包服务可以包括以下内容:•安全设备的管理,比如防火墙系统、IDS系统、VPN系统等的安全策略配置、设备日常管理、日志审计等工作;•网络及系统的日常安全监控、安全事件处理等;•安全服务的内容,比如风险评估、渗透测试、事件响应、调查取证等方面的内容;•数据安全的内容,如存储、备份、恢复等;•日常安全人员外包服务等。

在实际的安全运维外包服务的运行模式中,一般又可以分为两类:一类根据其特点可称之为安全托管服务,另一类则是我最推崇的、真正的安全管理服务。

安全托管服务比较容易理解,即将自己的需要管理的业务系统托管到安全外包服务提供商(MSSP)那里,这类的MSSP具备专业的安全托管环境,一般自己拥有或租用专业的IDC机房,提供专业的安全运维环境,比如Internet带宽、安全防护设备、安全运维平台等。

而我所推崇的安全管理服务的服务商(MSSP)一般具有完善安全解决方案(如全线的安全产品)或具备较高的安全运营管理水平,他们利用自己的核心优势,为客户提供外包的安全服务。

比如某用户可选择将终端的恶意软件防护工作外包出去,那么MSSP将根据用户的环境,为其提供全系列的诸如防病毒、防垃圾、内容过滤等安全防护产品解决方案、日常人员的技术支持以及管理和应急响应等服务,这种安全管理服务的案例参考这篇文章。

项目逻辑拆解模型

项目逻辑拆解模型

项目逻辑拆解模型
项目逻辑拆解是指将一个复杂的项目分解为多个简单的模块或任务,以便更好地理解和管理项目进度。

在进行项目逻辑拆解时,可以采用以下模型:
1. 工作分解结构(Work Breakdown Structure,WBS):WBS 是最常用的项目逻辑拆解模型之一。

它将项目按照层次结构进行分解,将整个项目划分为可管理的工作包和任务,帮助团队成员理解项目的范围和任务分配。

2. 甘特图(Gantt Chart):甘特图是以时间为基准的项目计划工具,可以清晰地展示项目中各个任务的起止时间、持续时间和任务依赖关系。

通过甘特图,可以对项目进行逻辑拆解,并确定任务的先后顺序,以及任务之间的依赖关系。

3. 网络图(Network Diagram):网络图是一种以图形方式表示项目中任务之间逻辑关系的模型。

通过网络图,可以清晰地展示任务之间的逻辑顺序和依赖关系,包括任务的并行和串行关系,有助于识别项目中的关键路径和风险点。

4. 进度计划模型:进度计划模型通过将任务按照其优先级和时间要求进行排序,然后确定任务的开始和结束时间,从而形成项目的进度计划。

这种模型可以帮助确定项目中的关键任务和里程碑,并确保项目按时完成。

以上是常用的几种项目逻辑拆解模型,根据项目的实际情况和需求,可以选择合适的模型进行使用。

在进行项目逻辑拆解时,
需要考虑到任务之间的依赖关系、资源分配和时间约束等因素,以确保项目能够按计划进行和完成。

gartner最新技术成熟度曲线图详细分析教学内容

gartner最新技术成熟度曲线图详细分析教学内容

Gartner hype cycle 2011GartnerGartner 全球最具权威的IT 研究与顾问咨询公司,成立于1979年, 总部设在美国康涅狄克州斯坦福。

其研究范围覆盖全部IT 产业,就IT 的研究、发展、评估、应用、市场等领域,为客户提供客观、公正的 论证报告及市场调研报告,协助客户进行 市场分析、技术选择、项目 论证、投资决策。

为决策者在投资风险和管理、营销策略、发展方向 等重大问题上提供重要咨询建议帀助决策者作出正确抉择。

hype cycle (发展规律周期)模型由Gartner 网站发行,是一个非常广泛的行业发展的周期预测。

hypecycle 描述了一项技术从诞生到成熟的过程,并将现有各种技术所处的发展阶 段标注在图上,为一些行业的发展作出很好的预测Gartn er 2011 技术成熟度曲线eKpectation&jAcavlty SirMlTItSccui AnaMiCi心CMP y 、 30 Primrg 「 Recosrwton —HSpeed>lo-S4»*dii Trantlaficn -| Inlem 占疵 Thrpa.Wjf 博O WA I KMI Anwemgi■Ehg Daria* and E ,曲PnoCMUngi sncl lAwwgtnwnl /■ taMeT TV —WCr- PiwrtCcmfMUnfl~ kugmerted 只是皿対 UftXl LnOmi>tftr»0T abWVrhMi AisMttnltIn-Memory Daiat»M Managpemerrl S^I B ^TS QGe«bwra HA«gnflH3ini■ WhKfww I D - MKfHfwNttEworkt StnwSocial TV •, TO11Tvchnotogy宏需 Trounh ofTWO"XUESlop* of lE nlightvfiflwMPiattM of Prockict^itytimeYa^rt to mainitream adoption: O bets (han 2 y«jr« O 2 to 5 years• 5 to 10 years 血 mc*e than 1Q yeartobioieie* before ^^feau主流采纳时长两年内hosted virtual desktop —托管虚拟桌面。

超融合架构有了自己的Gartner 魔力象限

超融合架构有了自己的Gartner 魔力象限

超融合架构有了自己的Gartner 魔力象限作者:暂无来源:《计算机世界》 2018年第12期超融合架构(HCI)因其便于管理、可简化新工作负载的部署、优化成本等优势而受到了企业的关注。

市场研究公司Gartner近期公布了超融合架构魔力象限,并预测说,目前部署在三层IT基础设施上的关键业务应用到2020 年将有20% 迁移至超融合架构。

魔力象限是Gartner 分析科技市场的一种独创研究工具。

在前些年,Gartner只是将超融合架构作为集成系统研究中的一部分。

超融合集成系统(HCIS)是组成Gartner 集成系统魔力象限的四类产品中的一类,其他三类分别为:集成架构系统(IIS)、集成堆栈系统(ISS)、集成参考架构(IRA)。

现在,超融合架构有了自己的报告,重要的是,新分析考虑到了纯软件超融合厂商,如VMware 和微软。

这表明,总体上,超融合市场正在持续发展,部署选择也正增多。

一些企业选择了集成的超融合设备,部分企业则选择了作为参考架构模式组件销售的HCI 软件。

公有云中的“HCI 即服务”也是一个选择。

Gartner 的新魔力象限包含了提供超融合架构解决方案的12 家厂商,他们分别为(按字母顺序排序):思科、D a t a C o r e、D e l l E M C、HPE、HTBase、华为、微软、N ut a n ix、P i v o t3、S c a l eComputing、Stratoscale 和VMware。

Gartner 依次介绍了这些厂商的产品解决方案的优缺点,并根据他们的前瞻性和执行能力进行了评分。

首先, 让我们了解一下背景知识。

什么是超融合超融合为一种在单个系统中整合了存储、虚拟计算和网络的IT 架构,用以降低数据中心复杂性,提高可扩展性。

超融合平台包含了一个针对虚拟计算、软件定义存储和虚拟网络的管理程序。

与以前的解决方案相比,超融合架构具有简单灵活的优点。

在所有的超融合架构实例中,集成的存储系统、服务器和网络交换机被设计作为单一系统进行管理。

九宫格复盘法

九宫格复盘法

九宫格复盘法简介九宫格复盘法是一种系统化的项目管理方法,通过将项目划分为九个关键领域,以便全面、详细地评估项目的进展和问题。

每个领域都代表着项目的一个关键方面,包括目标、策略、执行、控制、风险、资源、沟通、团队和学习。

九个领域1.目标:明确项目的目标,确保项目团队对项目的目标有清晰的认识,并能够衡量项目的成功与否。

2.策略:确定实现项目目标的策略和方法,并制定相应的计划。

3.执行:实施项目计划,按照既定的时间和资源进行项目工作。

4.控制:监控项目的进展和绩效,及时发现并解决项目中出现的问题。

5.风险:识别和评估项目的风险,并制定相应的风险管理计划,以最小化项目风险对项目目标的影响。

6.资源:合理分配项目资源,包括人力、物力和财力等,确保项目按计划进行。

7.沟通:确保项目团队之间的良好沟通,并及时向关键利益相关者传达项目的信息。

8.团队:建设高效的项目团队,包括招募合适的人员、培训和激励团队成员等。

9.学习:总结项目的经验教训,以便在将来的项目中能够更好地应用。

九宫格复盘法步骤1.确定项目的九个关键领域,并在九宫格中标注出来。

2.将项目进展以及项目中的问题和挑战记录在九宫格的相应领域中。

可以使用文本、图表或其他形式记录。

3.对每个领域进行评估,包括评估项目的进展、问题的严重程度以及已经采取的措施和解决方案。

4.根据评估结果,对项目的九个领域制定相应的改进计划,以便更好地推进项目的进展并解决存在的问题。

5.实施改进计划,并监控改进的效果。

6.定期进行九宫格复盘,评估项目的进展以及改进计划的效果,并根据评估结果进行相应的调整和改进。

九宫格复盘的好处1.全面评估:九宫格复盘法能够全面评估项目的各个方面,确保项目在各个关键领域都得到充分考虑。

2.问题识别:通过将项目划分为不同的领域,可以更容易地发现项目中存在的问题和挑战。

3.改进计划:九宫格复盘法能够帮助项目团队制定具体的改进计划,以便更好地推进项目的进展和解决问题。

项目组合管理软件的魔方图分析(doc 14页)(英文版)

项目组合管理软件的魔方图分析(doc 14页)(英文版)

项目组合管理软件的魔方图分析(doc 14页)(英文版)Gartner项目组合管理软件的魔方图2003Magic Quadrant for Project Portfolio Management, 200311 July 2003Matt LightDocument Type: Research NoteNote Number: M-20-2777Applications for project portfolio and resource management can boost team performance, and enable IT management and others to access real-time data via dashboards for prioritization and rapid decision making.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------What You Need to KnowHeightened interest in integrated project portfolio management solutions has sustained this market through hard times. By broadening its view of project management to an organizational governance context, IT management can increasingly address portfolios of projects, priorities, resources and more.Analysispressures have mounted because of the tough PPM market (as well as competition from the Microsoft Project product line), while growth rates for most vendors have decreased or stopped altogether.As noted last year (see "2002 Project/Resource Management Magic Quadrant), application vendors from other areas have also been entering the market and contributing to growth in this space. Since 3Q02, the vendors of the more-integrated PPM solutions have struggled, and the competition is heating up (see Figure 1 and Note 1).Figure 1The PPM Magic QuadrantSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)Note 1Evaluation CriteriaAbility to ExecuteVendor viabilityManagement teamTrack record in delivery and support Functional depthSupport capabilitySales and marketingCompleteness of VisionVision of technology and the marketResourcing (including external)Consulting/service commitmentPackage breadthPlatform, database and ERP supportTeam collaboration featuresIS organization requirementsVendors' vision foci differ. Some, such as the enterprise resource planning (ERP) providers, initially focused on project cost accounting, then added planning, resourcing and other PPM features. Others (Primavera Systems, for example) focused first on the latter set of functions, enabling project cost management and exporting cost accounting data to an ERP back end, and later added ways to collect nonproject costs, such as work requests. Although approaching PPM requirements with different strengths, these applications can provide reliable IT project and service status data, which was formerly available only in fragments (for example, in such static documents as time reports or resource plans in Excel).In assembling a complete solution, PPM packages often provide integration to address gaps or weaknesses in functionality. Another example of integration is the common dependence on Microsoft Project, while focusing on portfolio analysis, tracking, resourcing, costing, collaboration or other features and offering project planning (such as Gantt charts) for those situations when more-detailed scheduling (inMicrosoft Project or alternative schedulers) is not required (see Figure 2).Figure 2PPM: Evolution of an Application SuiteSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)During the past year, developments in the PPM market have included the growing importance of portfolio features — hence, our reference to it as project portfolio management, rather than project/resource management (although resource profiling, leveling and so forth remain significant). IBM has been a growing presence in this market, as well as at its fringes; it acquired Rational Software last year, as well as PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Consulting, including its Summit Ascendant product line, which features tools, ITprocess support and project management methodology.More directly in the PPM space, IBM has invested in Systemcorp and has assisted in the development of Systemcorp's Enterprise PM Office, which shows an accurate view of market requirements, with an effective breadth of functionality that includes full scheduling, resourcing, and time and expense reporting. Service request management and defect-tracking features further support the needs of IS organizations. Scope management features enable users to integrate project requirements to plan and automate project document management, including version control and the ability to link documents to any level of a work breakdown structure.Built in a Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) framework, PM Office's portal approach enables simpler user configurations than previous releases and also features a native Enterprise Dashboard, with hundreds of C-level stored procedures, including many for portfolio reporting. Previously focused on IBM's DB2 database platform, PM Office now directly supports the Oracle database as well.An emerging group of "portfolio analysis" vendors has begun offering solutions for analyzing IT investments and assets, some (such as Pacific Edge Software) as part of PPM product lines (see "The Gartner Portfolio Management Tool for IT Investment"). Other offerings, although short of being PPM products (see Note 2), are moving to offer planning, resourcing and other features that approach the PPM market.Among these emerging tools is Artemis International Solutions' PortfolioDirector (see "Artemis PortfolioDirector for Managing IT Investments"), which has been a bright spot for Artemis in recent years as the company has struggled to put its financial challenges behind it.Note 2PPM Processes for Application SupportA PPM application addresses most of the nine processes defined by the Project Management Institute's Project Management Book of Knowledge: project scope management, time management (that is, planning or scheduling), cost management, resource management, quality management, project communications management, project risk management and project procurement management. The ninth area enables the integration of these processes, such as for pipeline or other analytics. (See "Project Portfolio Management (PPM) Applications: Perspective.")With a profitable quarter to end 2002 (based largely on PortfolioDirector momentum and cost cutting), Artemis continues to correct its cost structure after acquiring the bulk of its joint ventures worldwide. With continued strength in product revenue in Europe, any Artemis comeback is likely to begin there.Another important portfolio analysis tool is ProSight, an innovative solution that entered the American market a few years ago. Using a partnering strategy that involved suchvendors as Changepoint, Evolve, PeopleSoft and PlanView, the ProSight tool enabled vendors to extend their offerings. These partners have typically developed competing solutions. ProSight has deepened its tool, adding "playbooks" of dashboards, scorecards, pick lists and forms to target such procedures as IT service-level management, system retirement, project prioritization and IT inventory analysis.Other notable portfolio analysis tools come from Portfolio DecisionWare (an AXS-One/Tivity partner) and United Management Technologies, which has developed StratFrames. Both also offer consulting services as a major part of their businesses. In addition, ProSight has strategically partnered with Fujitsu Consulting for consulting services in the portfolio management space. Lawson Software and Changepoint have similar strategic partnerships with Deloitte & Touche, and PeopleSoft has partnered with Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (CGE&Y).Since 2Q01, Evolve has increasingly marketed outside its initial professional services administration (PSA) niche. In addition to product development, the vendor has targeted IS organizations, especially with its Evolve 6 Portfolio Management version, which was released in late 2002. In March, Evolve introduced its work request management solution, which is similar to that offered by PlanView and Changepoint. These capabilities were among the features that caused Primavera to acquire the chronically unprofitable Evolve for $13 million in March 2003 (see "Primavera to Acquire Evolve, Expand Project Management Line").In the IT and application management space, Kintana — slated for acquisition this quarter by Mercury Interactive — has rounded out its product line during the last 12 to 18 months, with demand, portfolio, project, program and time management tools grouped under the banner of "IT Governance." At the same time, Rational's Project Console dashboard has gained traction in Rational's user base, although it falls short of being a PPM product.Along the same lines, PlanView has introduced a set of organizational governance processes called "Prisms," which it has built into its PlanView Portfolio Management 7.3 solution, which was launched at Gartner's Spring Symposium in March. The 11 Prisms are divided into three categories: investments, projects and service. They include a configurable, prepopulated database of attributes and stage gates for different initiatives (such as models for a business investment planning effort, a major development project or a production system support service).Similarly, Changepoint has pursued a vision blending IT portfolio management with resource and project planning and tracking, resulting in a partnership with Deloitte & Touche marketing a "CIO Portal." Now in v.8, the Changepoint product has been rebuilt on .NET, with added Oracle database support, and it has been converted to Unicode for ease of translation (a Spanish language version has also been added). This, along with ongoing enhancement of its request management/help desk-style features, has increased the proportion ofChangepoint's internal corporate IT customers and prospects to more than 50 percent, while its professional service target market has slowed purchases.Microsoft remains a strong presence in the marketplace with its Microsoft Project product line, which features MSP Standard, Professional, Server and Web Access (see "Got a Plan? Microsoft Project 2002 Preview") and provides an effective PPM solution in the Windows and SQL Server environments. Revenue growth for this product line has enabled additional R&D, which has yielded a Microsoft Project 2003 release that is due in the fall, enhancing synergies with other Microsoft technologies, including Windows Sharepoint Services, Office and Outlook. Continued work with Microsoft Solution Partners to address implementation issues provides valuable experience in addressing enterprise needs.ERP II vendors continue to target the space, both defensively (to prevent PPM "midoffice" vendors from expanding their enterprise footprints) and offensively, with PPM products or features packaged with parts of their application platforms to address PPM market requirements. Although initially offered to extend their implementations' project accounting and reporting functionality, some have done significant acquisitions and development.Lawson's offering — enhancing its 2001 acquisition of the XML-based Account4 PSA technology — now features portfolio analysis, with consulting support from Answerthink. Its Service Automation PPM product directly supports SOP 98-1reporting of application development costs with guidelines for expensing vs. capitalization. Version 5.1's Smart Notification monitors data from Lawson or external systems, including the Web, to provide alerts (such as for schedule overruns) via a variety of devices.Oracle's new PPM solution, which was introduced in June 2003, extends its established Oracle Projects module (formerly focused on project costing and billing, with some recent resourcing features) with three new products: Project Management, for building work plans, controlling project issues and changes and tracking progress; Project Collaboration, with a project "workspace" for managing and enabling real-time issue resolution; and Project Intelligence, for analyzing project data.PeopleSoft also has an established project accounting module, which has been extended in recent years with resource management and T&E in its Enterprise Service Automation (ESA) offering. This also features a Contracts module and a Services Procurement module, which PeopleSoft hopes to leverage if greater demand for IT services accompanies an economic recovery. With consulting partner CGE&Y, it also offers CIO OneSource, a combined PPM product/service for IT.SAP is approaching the market with new offerings that may challenge the competition next year: xRPM, a "cross app" for resource and program management that is positioned as a product targeting internal R&D or IS organizations, and SAP Professional Services, a customer relationship management(CRM) solution. Similarly, Denmark-based Maconomy offers vertically differentiated solutions with product templates that target marketing/advertising agencies, audit/tax consulting and research organizations, although they do not target internal IT. Epicor Software does not specifically target IT either, although its Epicor for Service Enterprises software is adaptable, and it has retooled its product line for Web services delivery via its Internet Component Architecture.Another deal of note was Scitor's spin-off last August of its tool business as Sciforma. Its established PS Suite extends advanced planning, tracking and multiproject resource leveling via its Project Communicator (which includes Inform, Objects and Admin modules). Sciforma's new PS Next will go further with workforce skill and capacity management and the ability to track hours against budgets, along withstate-of-the-art project planning and scheduling. We expect PS Next's new J2EE framework pricing to drive PPM pricing of flexible, configurable Web services.With another round of investment ($10.5 million in February) and a return to profitability, a stabilized Niku may be poised to take advantage of potential economic rebounds in 2004. On the product front, Niku 6.1 shipped in 2Q03, featuring portlets and streamlined navigation of its five main modules — Niku Projects, Portfolio Manager, Resource Planner, Financial Manager and Niku Workbench — effectively getting the product in shape. Among its new and upgraded Niku 6 customers are several implementations of more than 2,000 users (including team members reporting time/status).Business Engine's v.5 release deepens its budget management, embeds Microsoft Project, adds more online analytical processing (OLAP) cubes for financial management and provides new features for external contractor management. The company has had key implementations at Deutsche Bank, Merrill-Lynch and Delphi Automotive, and each deployment exceeds 5,000 users. Tenrox also embeds Microsoft Project for synchronization without import-export, has a strong focus on T&E and billing, and features an effective workflow tool reminiscent of process-modeling tools offered by ERP vendors.There is a significant PPM niche market for enterprises leveraging the IBM/Lotus Domino platform for PPM purposes. Automation Centre offers TrackerSuite, featuring resource management, time-tracking Domino-based project collaboration, document management and workflow. Customers include DuPont and American Electric Power. Automation Centre also offers a Microsoft-based product. Similarly, Eden Communications leverages Domino with its ProjecTrak family of products. It targets IS with a bug tracker, help desk, asset management and software designer module, among others. Genius Project from the European(Swiss-based) company Genius Inside features risk and simulation modules.Key IssuesWhat project management tools, processes and techniques are required for delivering high-quality, on-time andon-budget applications?How will ERP II vendors and markets evolve?How will enterprises improve the operational efficiency of their e-workplace infrastructures during the next five years? How should project/process management groups for an application development organization be set up, and with what support tools?What tools and technologies will enable enterprises to operate in real time?Acronym KeyCGE&Y Cap Gemini Ernst & YoungCRM customer relationship managementEPM Enterprise Project ManagementERP enterprise resource planningESA Enterprise Service AutomationJ2EE Java 2 Platform, Enterprise EditionOLAP online analytical processingPPM project portfolio managementPSA professional services administrationPwC PricewaterhouseCoopersReturn to Top--------------------------------------------------------------------------------© 2003 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information containedherein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.。

MSF组队模型

MSF组队模型

MSF 组队模型v. 3.1发布日期:点击此处下载本白皮书的副本Microsoft 解决方案框架白皮书致谢Paul Haynes,程序经理,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkAllison Robin,主任,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkEnzo Paschino,程序经理,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkMark Short,程序经理,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkPervez Kazmi,程序经理,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkRob Oikawa,程序经理,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkScott Getchell,程序经理,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkLaura Hargrave,技术编辑,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkMike Lubrecht,技术撰稿人,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkNany Huber,技术编辑,Microsoft Solutions FrameworkSuzana Vukcevic,程序经理,Microsoft 比利时Paulo Henrique Leocadio, Microsoft Consulting Services,巴西Paulo Rocha, Microsoft Consulting Services,新西兰Dolph Santello, Microsoft Consulting Services,美国Ralph Schimpl,主任,Microsoft 澳大利亚摘要Microsoft 解决方案框架(MSF) 组队模型描述了微软如何通过构建人员以及人员的行为来实现项目成功。

模型专门为小组成员定义了各类角色群、职能领域、职责和指导,帮助他们在整个项目生命周期中实现各自的工作目标。

GARTNER项目组合管理软件魔方图(整理)

GARTNER项目组合管理软件魔方图(整理)

Gartner工程组合管理软件的魔方图2003Magic Quadrant for Project Portfolio Management, 200311 July 2003Matt LightDocument Type: Research NoteNote Number: M-20-2777Applications for project portfolio and resource management can boost team performance, and enable IT management and others to access real-time data via dashboards for prioritization and rapid decision making.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------What You Need to KnowHeightened interest in integrated project portfolio management solutions has sustained this market through hard times. By broadening its view of project management to an organizational governance context, IT management can increasingly address portfolios of projects, priorities, resources and more.AnalysisStrategic Planning AssumptionsBy 2006, more than 50 percent of all project portfolio management functions will be packaged as flexibly configurable, modular Web services (0.6 probability).By 2006, at least 50 percent of IS organizations will have adopted a mix of project portfolio management application services for managing team collaboration, allocating resources, and tracking utilization and costs (0.7 probability).Enterprises will continue to reduce the number of tools needed to manage IT and other project portfolios, in part to provide quicker visibility via direct rollup and analysis of portfolio data. Enterprises delivering projects large and small have long blended tools and manual solutions to allocate resources, schedule activities and milestones, track progress, share project-related documents, control project risks and otherwise manage their project portfolios (see "Ways to Speed Up Projects in the Real-Time Enterprise"). We believe that, during the next five years, project portfolio management (PPM) functions will be increasingly consolidated in flexible and configurable "smart suites" of PPM Web services.A smart enterprise suite can extend platforms to create specialized applications that integrate analytical, business and content management application functionalities, which is precisely what's happening with PPM packages (see >"The Future of the Smart Enterprise Suite"). This trend has been slowly gaining momentum, inhibited by market conditions and the resulting constraints on R&D. Furthermore, pricing pressures have mounted because of the tough PPM market (as well as competition from the Microsoft Project product line), while growth rates for most vendors have decreasedor stopped altogether.As noted last year (see "2002 Project/Resource Management Magic Quadrant), application vendors from other areas have also been entering the market and contributing to growth in this space. Since 3Q02, the vendors of the more-integrated PPM solutions have struggled, and the competition is heating up (see Figure 1 and Note 1).Figure 1The PPM Magic QuadrantSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)Note 1Evaluation CriteriaAbility to ExecuteVendor viabilityManagement teamTrack record in delivery and supportFunctional depthSupport capabilitySales and marketingCompleteness of VisionVision of technology and the marketResourcing (including external)Consulting/service commitmentPackage breadthPlatform, database and ERP supportTeam collaboration featuresIS organization requirementsVendors' vision foci differ. Some, such as the enterprise resource planning (ERP) providers, initially focused on project cost accounting, then added planning, resourcing and other PPM features. Others (Primavera Systems, for example) focused first on the latter set of functions, enabling project cost management and exporting cost accounting data to an ERP back end, and later added ways to collect nonproject costs, such as work requests. Although approaching PPM requirements with different strengths, these applications can provide reliable IT project and service status data, which was formerly available only in fragments (for example, in such static documents as time reports or resource plans in Excel).In assembling a complete solution, PPM packages often provide integration to address gaps or weaknesses in functionality. Another example of integration is the common dependence on Microsoft Project, while focusing on portfolio analysis, tracking, resourcing, costing, collaboration or other features and offering project planning (such as Gantt charts) for those situations when more-detailed scheduling (in Microsoft Project or alternative schedulers) is not required (see Figure 2).Figure 2PPM: Evolution of an Application SuiteSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)During the past year, developments in the PPM market have included the growing importance of portfolio features — hence, our reference to it as project portfolio management, rather thanproject/resource management (although resource profiling, leveling and so forth remain significant). IBM has been a growing presence in this market, as well as at its fringes。

garner象限解读

garner象限解读

garner象限解读
Gartner魔力象限是Gartner公司对行业中的供应商进行评估比较的一个工具,主要通过一套标准的方法,基于行业市场中各供应商的执行力和前瞻性表现,生成魔力象限图和相应的分析报告。

魔力象限的纵轴为供应商的“执行力”(Ability to Execute),用于评估供应商将其愿景变成市场现实的能力,评估维度包含产品或服务的竞争力及成功度、企业整体生存能力、销售执行力与定价、市场状况、客户体验以及公司的整体运营,其实质是揭示企业在市场的成功度。

横轴为供应商的“前瞻性”(Completeness of Vision),评估维度包含企业的市场理解、市场战略、产品战略、营销战略、产品创新、行业战略及地域战略,其实质是解释企业在行业内的领先度。

Gartner魔力象限研究报告对于有意向找一家能满足自身需求的公司的投资者以及力图在市场中PK掉竞争者且可获得优势的企业来说,用处极大。

它能够帮助企业客户评估对于某个技术供应商的采购与投资。

然而,不是所有的供应商都能进入魔力象限。

纳入和移除标准发生变化,市场动量指数成为供应商入选的关键前提。

因此,在选择技术供应商时,企业需要考虑其在魔力象限中的位置及其评估标准。

项目管理五个过程组和九大知识领域矩阵图

项目管理五个过程组和九大知识领域矩阵图
知识域过程组
启动过程组
计划过程组
执行过程组
监控过程组
收尾过程组
整体管理
制定项目章程
项目管理规划
指导和管理项目执行
监视与控制项目工作
项目收尾
制定初步范围说明书
整体变更控制
范围管理
范围规划
范围核实
范围定义
范围控制
创建WBS
时间管理
活动定义
活动排序
活动资源估算
活动历时估算
制定进度计划
成本管理
成本估算
成本控制
成本预算
源管理
人力资源规划编制
团队建设
团队管理
团队组建
沟通管理
沟通计划编制
信息发布
绩效报告
管理干系人
采购管理
采购规划
请求卖方回应
合同管理
合同收尾
计划签约
卖方选择
风险管理
风险管理计划编制
风险控制
风险识别
风险定性分析
风险定量分析
饱食终日,无所用心,难矣哉。——《论语•阳货》
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Gartner项目组合管理软件的魔方图2003Magic Quadrant for Project Portfolio Management, 200311 July 2003Matt LightDocument Type: Research NoteNote Number: M-20-2777Applications for project portfolio and resource management can boost team performance, and enable IT management and others to access real-time data via dashboards for prioritization and rapid decision making.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------What You Need to KnowHeightened interest in integrated project portfolio management solutions has sustained this market through hard times. By broadening its view of project management to an organizational governance context, IT management can increasingly address portfolios of projects, priorities, resources and more.AnalysisStrategic Planning AssumptionsBy 2006, more than 50 percent of all project portfolio management functions will be packaged as flexibly configurable, modular Web services (0.6 probability).By 2006, at least 50 percent of IS organizations will have adopted a mix of project portfolio management application services for managing team collaboration, allocating resources, and tracking utilization and costs (0.7 probability).Enterprises will continue to reduce the number of tools needed to manage IT and other project portfolios, in part to provide quicker visibility via direct rollup and analysis of portfolio data. Enterprises delivering projects large and small have long blended tools and manual solutions to allocate resources, schedule activities and milestones, track progress, share project-related documents, control project risks and otherwise manage their project portfolios (see "Ways to Speed Up Projects in the Real-Time Enterprise"). We believe that, during the next five years, project portfolio management (PPM) functions will be increasingly consolidated in flexible and configurable "smart suites" of PPM Web services.A smart enterprise suite can extend platforms to create specialized applications that integrate analytical, business and content management application functionalities, which is precisely what's happening with PPM packages (see >"The Future of the Smart Enterprise Suite"). This trend has been slowly gaining momentum, inhibited by market conditions and the resulting constraints on R&D. Furthermore, pricing pressures have mounted because of the tough PPM market (as well as competition from the Microsoft Project product line), while growth rates for most vendors have decreased or stopped altogether.As noted last year (see "2002 Project/Resource Management Magic Quadrant), application vendors from other areas have also been entering the market and contributing to growth in this space. Since 3Q02, the vendors of the more-integrated PPM solutions have struggled, and the competition is heating up (see Figure 1 and Note 1).Figure 1The PPM Magic QuadrantSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)Note 1Evaluation CriteriaAbility to ExecuteVendor viabilityManagement teamTrack record in delivery and supportFunctional depthSupport capabilitySales and marketingCompleteness of VisionVision of technology and the marketResourcing (including external)Consulting/service commitmentPackage breadthPlatform, database and ERP supportTeam collaboration featuresIS organization requirementsVendors' vision foci differ. Some, such as the enterprise resource planning (ERP) providers, initially focused on project cost accounting, then added planning, resourcing and other PPM features. Others (Primavera Systems, for example) focused first on the latter set of functions, enabling project cost management and exporting cost accounting data to an ERP back end, and later added ways to collect nonproject costs, such as work requests. Although approaching PPM requirements with different strengths, these applications can provide reliable IT project and service status data, which was formerlyavailable only in fragments (for example, in such static documents as time reports or resource plans in Excel).In assembling a complete solution, PPM packages often provide integration to address gaps or weaknesses in functionality. Another example of integration is the common dependence on Microsoft Project, while focusing on portfolio analysis, tracking, resourcing, costing, collaboration or other features and offering project planning (such as Gantt charts) for those situations when more-detailed scheduling (in Microsoft Project or alternative schedulers) is not required (see Figure 2).Figure 2PPM: Evolution of an Application SuiteSource: Gartner Research (July 2003)During the past year, developments in the PPM market have included the growing importance of portfolio features — hence, our reference to it as project portfolio management, rather than project/resource management (although resource profiling, leveling and so forth remain significant). IBM has been a growing presence in this market, as well as at its fringes; it acquired Rational Software last year, as well as PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Consulting, including its Summit Ascendant product line, which features tools, IT process support and project management methodology.More directly in the PPM space, IBM has invested in Systemcorp and has assisted in the development of Systemcorp's Enterprise PM Office, which shows an accurate view of market requirements, with an effective breadth of functionality that includes full scheduling, resourcing, and time and expense reporting. Service request management and defect-tracking features further support the needs of IS organizations. Scope management features enable users to integrate project requirements to plan and automate project document management, including version control and the ability to link documents to any level of a work breakdown structure.Built in a Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) framework, PM Office's portal approach enables simpler user configurations than previous releases and also features a native Enterprise Dashboard, with hundreds of C-level stored procedures, including many for portfolio reporting. Previously focused on IBM's DB2 database platform, PM Office now directly supports the Oracle database as well.An emerging group of "portfolio analysis" vendors has begun offering solutions for analyzing IT investments and assets, some (such asPacific Edge Software) as part of PPM product lines (see "The Gartner Portfolio Management Tool for IT Investment"). Other offerings, although short of being PPM products (see Note 2), are moving to offer planning, resourcing and other features that approach the PPM market. Among these emerging tools is Artemis International Solutions' PortfolioDirector (see "Artemis PortfolioDirector for Managing IT Investments"), which has been a bright spot for Artemis in recent years as the company has struggled to put its financial challenges behind it.Note 2PPM Processes for Application SupportA PPM application addresses most of the nine processes defined by the Project Management Institute's Project Management Book of Knowledge: project scope management, time management (that is, planning or scheduling), cost management, resource management, quality management, project communications management, project risk management and project procurement management. The ninth area enables the integration of these processes, such as for pipeline or other analytics. (See "Project Portfolio Management (PPM) Applications: Perspective.")With a profitable quarter to end 2002 (based largely on PortfolioDirector momentum and cost cutting), Artemis continues to correct its cost structure after acquiring the bulk of its joint ventures worldwide. With continued strength in product revenue in Europe, any Artemis comeback is likely to begin there.Another important portfolio analysis tool is ProSight, an innovativesolution that entered the American market a few years ago. Using a partnering strategy that involved such vendors as Changepoint, Evolve, PeopleSoft and PlanView, the ProSight tool enabled vendors to extend their offerings. These partners have typically developed competing solutions. ProSight has deepened its tool, adding "playbooks" of dashboards, scorecards, pick lists and forms to target such procedures as IT service-level management, system retirement, project prioritization and IT inventory analysis.Other notable portfolio analysis tools come from Portfolio DecisionWare (an AXS-One/Tivity partner) and United Management Technologies, which has developed StratFrames. Both also offer consulting services as a major part of their businesses. In addition, ProSight has strategically partnered with Fujitsu Consulting for consulting services in the portfolio management space. Lawson Software and Changepoint have similar strategic partnerships with Deloitte & Touche, and PeopleSoft has partnered with Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (CGE&Y).Since 2Q01, Evolve has increasingly marketed outside its initial professional services administration (PSA) niche. In addition to product development, the vendor has targeted IS organizations, especially with its Evolve 6 Portfolio Management version, which was released in late 2002. In March, Evolve introduced its work request management solution, which is similar to that offered by PlanView and Changepoint. These capabilities were among the features that caused Primavera to acquire the chronically unprofitable Evolve for $13 million in March 2003 (see "Primavera to Acquire Evolve, Expand Project Management Line").In the IT and application management space, Kintana — slated for acquisition this quarter by Mercury Interactive — has rounded out its product line during the last 12 to 18 months, with demand, portfolio, project, program and time management tools grouped under the banner of "IT Governance." At the same time, Rational's Project Console dashboard has gained traction in Rational's user base, although it falls short of being a PPM product.Along the same lines, PlanView has introduced a set of organizational governance processes called "Prisms," which it has built into its PlanView Portfolio Management 7.3 solution, which was launched at Gartner's Spring Symposium in March. The 11 Prisms are divided into three categories: investments, projects and service. They include a configurable, prepopulated database of attributes and stage gates for different initiatives (such as models for a business investment planning effort, a major development project or a production system support service).Similarly, Changepoint has pursued a vision blending IT portfolio management with resource and project planning and tracking, resulting in a partnership with Deloitte & Touche marketing a "CIO Portal." Now in v.8, the Changepoint product has been rebuilt on .NET, with added Oracle database support, and it has been converted to Unicode for ease of translation (a Spanish language version has also been added). This, along with ongoing enhancement of its request management/help desk-style features, has increased the proportion of Changepoint's internal corporate IT customers and prospects to more than 50 percent, while its professional service target market has slowed purchases.Microsoft remains a strong presence in the marketplace with its Microsoft Project product line, which features MSP Standard, Professional, Server and Web Access (see "Got a Plan? Microsoft Project 2002 Preview") and provides an effective PPM solution in the Windows and SQL Server environments. Revenue growth for this product line has enabled additional R&D, which has yielded a Microsoft Project 2003 release that is due in the fall, enhancing synergies with other Microsoft technologies, including Windows Sharepoint Services, Office and Outlook. Continued work with Microsoft Solution Partners to address implementation issues provides valuable experience in addressing enterprise needs.ERP II vendors continue to target the space, both defensively (to prevent PPM "midoffice" vendors from expanding their enterprise footprints) and offensively, with PPM products or features packaged with parts of their application platforms to address PPM market requirements. Although initially offered to extend their implementations' project accounting and reporting functionality, some have done significant acquisitions and development.Lawson's offering — enhancing its 2001 acquisition of the XML-based Account4 PSA technology — now features portfolio analysis, with consulting support from Answerthink. Its Service Automation PPM product directly supports SOP 98-1 reporting of application development costs with guidelines for expensing vs. capitalization. Version 5.1's Smart Notification monitors data from Lawson or external systems, including the Web, to provide alerts (such as for schedule overruns) via a variety of devices.Oracle's new PPM solution, which was introduced in June 2003,extends its established Oracle Projects module (formerly focused on project costing and billing, with some recent resourcing features) with three new products: Project Management, for building work plans, controlling project issues and changes and tracking progress; Project Collaboration, with a project "workspace" for managing and enabling real-time issue resolution; and Project Intelligence, for analyzing project data.PeopleSoft also has an established project accounting module, which has been extended in recent years with resource management and T&E in its Enterprise Service Automation (ESA) offering. This also features a Contracts module and a Services Procurement module, which PeopleSoft hopes to leverage if greater demand for IT services accompanies an economic recovery. With consulting partner CGE&Y, it also offers CIO OneSource, a combined PPM product/service for IT.SAP is approaching the market with new offerings that may challenge the competition next year: xRPM, a "cross app" for resource and program management that is positioned as a product targeting internal R&D or IS organizations, and SAP Professional Services, a customer relationship management (CRM) solution. Similarly, Denmark-based Maconomy offers vertically differentiated solutions with product templates that target marketing/advertising agencies, audit/tax consulting and research organizations, although they do not target internal IT. Epicor Software does not specifically target IT either, although its Epicor for Service Enterprises software is adaptable, and it has retooled its product line for Web services delivery via its Internet Component Architecture.Another deal of note was Scitor's spin-off last August of its toolbusiness as Sciforma. Its established PS Suite extends advanced planning, tracking and multiproject resource leveling via its Project Communicator (which includes Inform, Objects and Admin modules). Sciforma's new PS Next will go further with workforce skill and capacity management and the ability to track hours against budgets, along with state-of-the-art project planning and scheduling. We expect PS Next's new J2EE framework pricing to drive PPM pricing of flexible, configurable Web services.With another round of investment ($10.5 million in February) and a return to profitability, a stabilized Niku may be poised to take advantage of potential economic rebounds in 2004. On the product front, Niku 6.1 shipped in 2Q03, featuring portlets and streamlined navigation of its five main modules — Niku Projects, Portfolio Manager, Resource Planner, Financial Manager and Niku Workbench —effectively getting the product in shape. Among its new and upgraded Niku 6 customers are several implementations of more than 2,000 users (including team members reporting time/status).Business Engine's v.5 release deepens its budget management, embeds Microsoft Project, adds more online analytical processing (OLAP) cubes for financial management and provides new features for external contractor management. The company has had key implementations at Deutsche Bank, Merrill-Lynch and Delphi Automotive, and each deployment exceeds 5,000 users. Tenrox also embeds Microsoft Project for synchronization without import-export, has a strong focus on T&E and billing, and features an effective workflow tool reminiscent of process-modeling tools offered by ERP vendors.There is a significant PPM niche market for enterprises leveraging the IBM/Lotus Domino platform for PPM purposes. Automation Centre offers TrackerSuite, featuring resource management, time-tracking Domino-based project collaboration, document management and workflow. Customers include DuPont and American Electric Power. Automation Centre also offers a Microsoft-based product. Similarly, Eden Communications leverages Domino with its ProjecTrak family of products. It targets IS with a bug tracker, help desk, asset management and software designer module, among others. Genius Project from the European (Swiss-based) company Genius Inside features risk and simulation modules.Key IssuesWhat project management tools, processes and techniques are required for delivering high-quality, on-time and on-budget applications?How will ERP II vendors and markets evolve?How will enterprises improve the operational efficiency of theire-workplace infrastructures during the next five years?How should project/process management groups for an application development organization be set up, and with what support tools? What tools and technologies will enable enterprises to operate in real time?Acronym KeyCGE&Y Cap Gemini Ernst & YoungCRM customer relationship managementEPM Enterprise Project ManagementERP enterprise resource planningESA Enterprise Service AutomationJ2EE Java 2 Platform, Enterprise EditionOLAP online analytical processingPPM project portfolio managementPSA professional services administrationPwC PricewaterhouseCoopersReturn to Top--------------------------------------------------------------------------------© 2003 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.。

相关文档
最新文档