翻译课程论文
翻译理论之功能对等
翻译理论之功能对等《翻译理论》课程论文Functional Equivalence: A Comment on the English Version of ASmall Incident姓名:李娇学号:20140307210年级:2014级班级:2班专业:英语翻译任课教师:罗云二零一七年一月Functional Equivalence: A Comment on the English Version of ASmall IncidentAbstract: This article will comment the English version of A Small Incident translated by Yang Xianyi and Dai Naiyi based on the Functional Equivalence. Functional Equivalence theory was put forward by American translation theorist Eugene Nida.Through commenting words equivalence, syntactical equivalence and textual equivalence,w e can learn that Nida's functional equivalence theory has a good guiding influence on translation. 【keywords】Functional Equivalence;Eugene Nida;A Small Incident ;comment1.Brief Introduction of Eugene Nida and His TheoryEugene A. Nida (1914--) is one of the most distinguished contemporary translation theorists in the west. During his past fifty years of study in translation theory and practice, he has achieved great success in this field. His translation theory hasexerted a tremendous influence on the translation studies not only in western countries but also in Asian countries, especially in China. He is generally recognized as the most influential one among all the contemporary translation theorists.Functional equivalence theory was first put forward in 1964. This principle emphasizes the functional equivalence of information instead of the direct formal equivalence in translation so as to keep the meaning and style of the source language functionally equivalent to that of the target language as much as possible. The functional feature of the translation depends on the balance of two relationships, that is, the relationship between the target language receptor and the target text should generally be equivalent to the relationship between the source language receptor and the source text, and it is the two relationships that provide the basis for functional equivalence. Functional equivalence includes four levels: lexical equivalence, syntactical equivalence, textual equivalence and style equivalence.2.Brief Introduction of A Small Incident and the English VersionA Small Incident was writtenby Lu Xun in 1919, during the May 4th Movement. Althoughthe novel only has about 1000 words, its deep meaning makes people think a lot. There are three main characters in the novel: I, rickshaw man, an old woman. The subject of this passage involves three aspects at least: first, the criticism of intellectual to unenlightened masses,which showed by criticizing the old woman in the passage; second, the praise of the intellectual to part of the crowd, which showed by praising the rickshaw man in the passage; third, the self-reflection and new understand ofintellectual, which showed by “my” thoughts in the passage.How to translate properlythat a passage has concise words but deep meaning is the major problem of translators. I choose the English version by Yan Xianyi and Dai Naiyi, because it is a typical functional equivalence Theory-based translation. Dai Naiyi is a British, so her reaction to the translation equal to the target language re ader’s reaction to a gre at degree,and every time, Yang Xianyi will let Dai Naiyi read his translation and modify it to basically realize the functional equivalence of source language and target language./doc/805958643.html,mentsThe basic requirements of translation include:reveal the spirits and presentation of source text;natural presentation、concise form and same readers’ reaction. F rom Nida “ The readers of a translated text should be able to understand and appreciate it in essentially the same manner as the original readers did”(1995:224). Next ,I will comment the translation through words equivalence, syntactical equivalence and textual equivalence.3.1).words equivalenceWords and phrases are the basic meaning units. Strictly speaking, besides some professional technical terms ,there is no complete equivalent words and phrases. A translated sentence firstly depends on the chosen words whether properly or not.let’s look at the translation of the title:S-T:一件小事Yang: A Small IncidentAlthough Lu Xun chose “一件小事’’ as the title, the spirits of the passage are no simple.through out the contrast, readers can feel the enlightenment deeper. According to the explanationof “incident” in OXFORD ADV ANCED LEARNER'S English-Chinese Dictionary,incident:(1)something that happens, especially something unusual or unpleasant.(2)a serious or violent event, such as a crime, an accident or an attack. (3) a disagreement between t wo countries, often involving military forces[7]. According to Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, incident: (1)an event, especially one that is unusual, important, or violent. (2) a serious dis agreement between two countries[8]. According to explanation, incident can express unusual things but without the meaning of small things, so Yang and Dai use small to modify incident that make the contrast of the title and content more prominent.3.2).syntactical equivalenceSyntacticalequivalence is more complicated than lexical equivalence. In English- Chinese translation, singular and plural form is an important and evident problem. Plural meaning in Chinese is not expressed with any evident plural form, which is different in English. Moreover, for different target language, tender, number and tense should be taken into consideration in translation. Thus, translator should be clear about whether such a sentence grammar exists in the target language or not, and be clear about the frequency of such sentence grammar.S-T:风全住了,路上还很静。
翻译实践报告论文
翻译实践报告论文
在本学期的翻译实践课程中,我有幸参加了一项十分重要的任务:翻译实践报告论文。
这项任务不仅考验了我的翻译能力,还
锻炼了我的实践操作能力和论文写作能力。
首先,这篇论文的翻译部分对我的翻译能力提出了非常高的要求。
为了避免遗漏和误译,我必须花费大量的时间和精力来理解
每一个单词和句子,并尽可能地准确地传达源语言的含义。
其次,翻译实践报告论文的实践操作部分涉及到我对电脑和各
种翻译工具的熟练操作。
在翻译的过程中,我需要使用各种在线
字典和翻译软件来辅助我的翻译工作。
因此,我必须对这些工具
的使用非常熟悉,否则我会浪费很多时间在调试和学习上。
最后,我需要具备论文写作的能力,以便将我的翻译成果整理
成一篇系统性的论文。
写作过程中,我需要对文章进行逻辑分析,并使用恰当的语言表达我的意见和观点。
此外,我还需要遵循学
术规范,使用正确的引用格式和避免剽窃。
通过这次实践任务,我不仅巩固了自己的翻译技能,还加强了我的实践操作和论文写作能力。
同时,我也深刻认识到:翻译不仅仅是转化语言,更是一个融合了语言和文化的过程。
只有通过深入理解源语言,才能真正准确地传达原意,使目标读者得以深入了解作者的思想与精神追求。
总之,翻译实践报告论文使我更加清晰地认识到翻译的价值和重要性,在这个全球化时代,翻译已经成为人们相互沟通和交流的重要手段之一。
因此,我们需要不断进步和学习,提高自己的翻译能力,以更好地促进跨文化交流与理解。
发表英文翻译论文
发表英文翻译论文语言是人类传播信息的工具,作为各种语言互译的翻译理论本身就是一种是相对的理论。
下文是店铺为大家整理的关于发表英文翻译论文的范文,欢迎大家阅读参考!发表英文翻译论文篇1公示语的英文翻译摘要:公示语是一种较为独特的应用文体, 旨在于公共场所向公众公示须知的内容。
然而, 目前国内公示语的英译问题十分严重。
通过奈达的"功能对等"理论, 以中西文化差异在公示语中的体现为视角, 强调公示语的特点决定了其英译应重视功能上的对等而不是字词句上简单生硬的静态对等, 遵循正确的翻译原则,以实现公示语的预期功能。
关键词:公示语功能对等文化差异翻译原则1、引言公示语指的是在公共场所向公众公示须知内容的语言, 包括标识、指示牌、路牌、标语、公告、警示等等[1]。
罗选民、黎土旺对公示语进行界定, “公示语是指在公共场合所展示的文字, 具有特殊的交际功能, 以及提供信息和完成指令的作用”[2]。
随着中国与世界的接轨, 越来越多的国家希望了解中国, 很多外国朋友来到中国。
在这种跨文化交际的过程中, 汉语公示语的英译也日显重要。
然而, 目前国内公示语的英译问题十分严重, 误用、滥用现象到处存在,其中最大的问题是译者在翻译过程中忽视中西方文化的差异, 盲目追求字词句上简单生硬的静态对等, 以至于译文文本生硬, 达不到源语文本的预期功能和效果。
公示语英译的预期对象是在华外国友人和外国游客, 为的是达到向其警示、告知、宣传的预期功能。
其英译不是一种点缀, 而是一种有目的的行为, 即如何使译文达到与原文本同等的预期功能[3]。
本文通过奈达的“功能对等”理论, 以中西文化差异在公示语中的体现为视角, 强调公示语的功能特点决定了其英译应重视功能上的对等而不是字词句上简单生硬的静态对等, 应遵循正确的翻译原则,以实现其预期功能。
2、“功能对等”翻译理论与公示语翻译公示语作为一个信息时代和经济全球化时代的标志之一, 公开面对公众, 给予公众行为需求的文字信息传递。
有关英汉翻译论文
有关英汉翻译论文范文一:生态学视域下的英汉翻译一、引言:英汉翻译研究生态学视域的成立生态学是研究物质与周围环境关系的一门科学,其发轫之初很长时间里被用于自然科学研究。
而随着生态学的发展和交叉、跨学科研究日趋成熟,社会科学的研究者们发现了生态学与人文社会科学的相容性,认为人文社会领域和自然一样,事物与事物、事物与环境间都发生着联系,没有独立于环境之外的事物和现象,故而认为生态学研究的理论、方法同样适用于社会科学研究。
生态学研究与社会科学研究遂真正结合起来。
20世纪50年代以来,人们对文本的认识由仅仅关注认识文本内部自足性问题发展到研究文本内外部关联问题,研究的视野也随之由微观文字向宏观文化转向,人们对文本的认识,已无法将文本语言与该语言所蕴含或显现的某国或某民族的文化相割断。
对于成功的翻译者来说,他不仅要作为两种语言的专家,还要是两种语言各自代表的文化的熟知者。
对于英汉翻译的研究者来说,他们需要不断探寻着解释原文本与译文本之间形成文化差异的依据———这些依据就是社会各层面因素影响文本文字的关系。
生态学强调事物与其环境协调、互动、互相促进。
在英汉翻译领域,一个成功或优秀的译作应当是不仅内部自足和谐发展,而且内部与外部互惠互利、共生共栖的文本。
其动态性体现在这种交互作用是永无止息、不断旋螺式发展的,而非一成不变或者无意义的重复。
用生态学视角看待英汉翻译,为的是建立一种整体性思维。
有学者为“整体性”的意义进行了阐释:“整体性是生命的基本属性,整体性不是部分的简单累加,也不是由外力推动而形成的原子集合体,它有着超越部分之和的更为丰富的内涵和属性。
”对翻译及其研究工作来说,把握“整体性”是关键。
翻译活动涵盖原文本和译文本,涉及原文作者、译者、译文读者3方,包括语言和文化2个层面,同时受到政治环境、经济环境、主流意识形态等的影响。
梳理和廓清这些形成翻译活动的要素的动态平衡发展,有助于建构英汉翻译研究的生态学视域。
功能目的论—翻译课学期论文
Skopos TheoryAbstract: In the 1970’ s Germany, a linguist by the name of Hans J. Vermeer broke the linguist-oriented trend by introducing the skopos theory, the first known functional approach to translation, which defends that every translation has a purpose, which would consequently determine the strategies the translator should adopt. This paper main introduces Vermeer’ s skopos theory, with its merits as well as demerits, and gives some personal insights on this theory.Keywords: Vermeer, skopos theory, functional theories of translationSkopos theory, a niche theory in the field of translation studies, employs the prime principle of a purposeful action that determines a translation strategy. The intentionality of a translational action stated in a translation brief, the directives, and the rules guide a translator to attain the expected target text translatum. Emerged around the late twentieth century, skopos theory is the core of the four approaches of German functionalist translation theory.1.Functional theories of translationFunctional theories from Germany in the 1970s-1980s mark a move away from linguistic typologies towards a consideration of culture. Katharina Reiss, a linguist and translation scholar, created a model of translation criticism based on the function relation between the source and the target text, though her views are still concerned with the previous equivalence ones. As she states in her book Possibility and Limits of Translation Criticism, an ideal translation should be “in which the aim in the TL(target language) is equivalence as regards the conceptual content, linguistic form and communicative function of SL(source language)” [3].Going further than Reiss, Hans J. Vermeer completely refuses the equivalence-based theories, stating that “Linguistic alone won’t help us. First, because translating is not a merely and not even primarily a linguistic process. Secondly, because linguistics has not yet formulated the right question to tackle our problem” [4].And he put forward with the skopos theory, which lays foundation for the functional theories of translation. Justa Holz-Manttari introduces the theory of translatorial action. Similar to the ideas of Vermeer,Holz-Manttari describes translation as a complex action that is meant to achieve a specific purpose. Moreover, her theory focuses on the analysis of the participants (initiator, translator, target audience), their role and the conditions in which their activities take place. Christina Nord comes up with the “loyalty principle” of skopos theory, which states that the translators must be loyal to the author by making sure that his translatum doesn’t falsifies or is against the author’s original intentions.2. Skopos theory2.1 Synopsis of skopos theoryDiffering from previous translation studies which focus on a loyal reproduction of the source text in a target language based on principles of equivalence, Vermeer uses the action theory to defend that translation is an action with certain purpose. In the book composed with Reiss, he argues that every action has a purpose since “an action aims to achieve a goal and thus to alter the current states of affairs’’ [4]. As translating is a form of translational action that involves intentional communication (or interaction, if it affects two or more agents) and transition, there must be a purpose associated with it [6]. Because of this, Vermeer states “A translational action is governed by its purpose [4].” And he introduces the Greek word Skopos into translation, which means “aim’’ or “purpose” to propose his skopos theory of translation.According to Vermeer, to translate means “to produce a text in a target setting for a target purpose and target addressees in target circumstances” [4].This is Vermeer’ s definition of translation, and is the manifestation of skopos theory. He proposes that there are three possible types of purposes. Firstly, a general purpose that a translator strives for, such as translating as a source of professional income. Secondly, a communicative purpose of a target text in a target circumstance, such as to instruct the audience. Thirdly, the purpose of a translation strategy or approach, such as to exhibit the structural traits of the source language [2]. In the case of the term “skopos” in skopos theory, it refers to the second type of purpose. For Vermeer, the main aspect that determines the purpose of a translation is the target audience. This includes their culture-specific knowledge, their knowledge of the world, their expectations and theircommunicative needs. Besides, from Vermeer’ s definition on translation, we can see that Vermeer completely excludes the source text as a key factor because, for him, the source text is merely a “source of information” that is then transformed into a “source of information” in the target language. Conversely, what skopos theory emphasizes in translation is a translatum—the target text (outcome) of a source text. And it is the skopos of translation that determines what strategies translators should take to obtain the intended goals. “Skopos theory shaped the way translators work by detaching from the source text and focusing on the target purpose and audience’’ [5]. Hence we can that Skopos theory gives great emphasis on the target language and target recipients. And since the purpose of the translation is judged by the translators, translators are endowed with great power.Under the spokos theory, there are six directives. They are as follows:(1) A translatum is determined by its skopos.(2) A translatum is an offer of information in a target culture and languageconcerning an offer of information in a source culture and source language.(3) A translatum does not initiate an offer of information in a clearly reversible way.(4) A translatum must be internally coherent.(5) A translatum must be coherent with the source text.(6)The five rules [sic] above stand in hierarchical order, with the skopos rulepredominating.The first directive highlights that in whatever condition the translation action is always determined by its skopos, its aim or purpose. The second directive points out the importance between the relationship of the source text and target text to their functions in their respective linguistic and cultural contexts [6].The third directive implies that the translatum do not necessarily have the same function of the source text, emphasizing the irreversibility. And the fourth directive emphasizes the internal textual coherence of source text and fifth the TT’ s intertextual coherence with the ST. There are three rules encompassing the six directives:(1)The skopos rule. The first rule to obey in the process of translation is the purposeof an overall translational action. Skopos rule is always put in the first place.(2)The coherence rule. This rule requires that any translatum should make senseaccording to the target culture of the target language so that the receivers can make sense of it. As quoted from Nord, this rule states:A translation should be acceptable in a sense that it is coherent with the receivers’ situation [2].(3)The fidelity rule. The third “overarching’’ rule necessitates intertextual coherencebetween the source and target texts as target texts are produced in accordance to the information offered by source texts.As quoted from Dan, this third rule states: The TT (target text) should bear some kind of relationship with the corresponding ST (source text) [2].As for the relationship between the three rules, the third rule, the fidelity rule, is subordinate to the second rule, the coherence rule, which in turn is subordinate to the skopos rule. In other words, when translating, the translator should first ensure that the TT fulfills its purpose, then make sure the TT is itself coherent and only see that the TT demonstrates coherence with the ST.2.2 Merits of skopos theoryTo begin with, the skopos theory has provided solid theoretical foundation for translating practical texts. For instance, legal translation is the translation of legal and interlingual information. And it is culture-dependent and there may be specific conventions or concepts that are culture-bound and only exist in the source culture but not the target culture. Through the standard set by the skopos theory, translators measure the preservation of elements in their transfer from source to target text. Via the skopos rule and the coherence rule, the requirement that the target text is coherent for the target text receivers will help to inform translators on adjusting the degree of preservation they want such that this coherence is ensured. To some certain extent, Skopos theory has a wide range of practicability as it can promote translators ‘s efficiency when dealing with practical texts [7].Furthermore, Skopos theory highlights the importance of translators in translation activities, which greatly actives participation of translators. It breaks through the restriction of equivalence translation theory, studies translation from theperspectives of intercultural communication, and broadens the vision of translation studies [8].2.3 Demerits of skopos theoryThe flip side of the coin that involves the freedom to choose from different translation strategies based on the element of purpose, is that the theory may be seen as a vague framework that does not provide precise step-by-step orchestration. Students and translators in training do not have guidelines to follow diligently, possibly posing additional pressure and responsibilities on the translator to seek an adequate translation strategy. This can diminish their understanding and translation experiences for practical situations that are vital in the beginning stages of learning.Skopos theory focuses on the functional study of the TT. Tang Yujie argues that sometime, in order to achieve certain purpose, the translator may take the strategy of rewriting, which makes the TT far betray the original text. By taking into account the needs and expectations of the target audience, the translator is detaching completely from the source text.[7] Skopos theory does not pay sufficient attention to the linguistic nature of the ST nor to the reproduction of mirco-level features in the TT. Even if the skopos is adequately fulfilled, it may be inadequate at the stylistic or semantic levels of individual segments.In addition, since it is up to the translator to decide the purpose of translation action, the translator may lose his sense of responsibility and professional ethics in the process of translation, thus becoming a vulgar utilitarian or pragmatist.Moreover, not all translation has a purpose. What purports to be a “general” theory is in fact only valid for non-literary texts. Literary texts are considered to have no specific purpose.Finally, “Jargon such as translatum does little to further translation theory where workable terms (target text) already exist” [1].3.ConclusionBefore functional approaches to translation, and more specifically the skopos theory, translation consisted of a loyal reproduction of the source text in a target language, based on principles of equivalence. The most revolutionary aspect aboutthese new approaches is that the source text was no longer the king of the translation, something translators had to worship. Now, the translators are allowed and encouraged to take into consideration, and privilege, other important aspects, namely the purpose of the translation, and its target audience, who the text is intended for, bearing in mind their circumstances.In my point of view, skopos theory poses as a huge improvement for translation studies, since it shifts the focus of the translation process, enabling the translator to overcome cultural barriers. This makes TT into more natural-sounding and cultural-appropriate texts, with no comprehension constraints, that people can actually connect with, and feel like they are reading something that are written specifically for them.References:[1] Munday, Jeremy. Introduction Translation Studies: Theories and Applications [M]. 4th edition.London: Routledge, 2016.[2] Nord, Christiane. Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained (2nded.). London: Routledge,2018.[3] Reiss Katharina. Translation Criticis: The Potentials and Limitations.St. Jerome Publishing,1997.[4] Reiss, Katharina & Hans J. Vermeer. Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained [M]. translated by Christiane Nord. London: Routledge, 1984/2013.[5] Vermeer, Hans Josef . "Ein Rahmen für eine allgemeine Translationstheorie". Lebende Sprachen, 1978.[6] Xiaoyan Du. A Brief Introduction of Skopos Theory[J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,2012,2(10).[7]卞建华,崔永禄.功能主义目的论在中国的引进、应用与研究(1987—2005)[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006(05):82-88.[8] 汤玉洁.浅析翻译目的论[J].和田师范专科学校学报,2008(01):159-161.。
翻译理论论文
翻译理论基础学习收获一、翻译理论背景1.1 翻译学学科历史翻译实践活动的历史和人类文明的历史一样长久,西方翻译最早开始于公元三世纪,距今已有两千多年的历史。
作为文明古国的中国的翻译历史和西方一样悠久。
但由于对于翻译活动的认识存在诸多悖论,达不成一致意见,人们因追求所谓严整的体系、规范的术语而将历史上对翻译的传统认识排斥在理论之外,认为翻译学作为一门独立的研究学科才不过50多年的历史。
1972年,詹姆斯.霍尔姆斯(James S.Holmes,美国人)在哥本哈根第三届国际应用语言学大会上宣读了《The name and nature of translation studies》(翻译学的名称和性质),这篇论文被普遍认为是翻译学科建设的奠基之作。
对研究翻译的人来说,传统的翻译理论也应该受到一定的关注。
1.2 翻译学学科框架在《The name and nature of translation studies》中,霍尔姆斯将翻译研究领域的名称命名为“translation studyies”,并勾画出了一套系统的翻译研究框架,图里(Toury,1995:10)将其绘制成下图,广为学界引用:图1 翻译学学科框架图在该架构中,翻译学的各个领域彼此之间相互联系,相互作用。
霍尔姆斯的翻译学框架图被视作翻译学作为独立学科建立的标志。
二、语言2.1语言和言语什么是语言?语言是人类所特有的用来表达意思、交流思想的工具,是人们进行沟通交流的各种表达符号系统,它是一种特殊的社会现象,是民族的重要特征之一,由语音、词汇和语法构成一定的系统。
符合随着社会历史的发展可变可塑,不是固定恒定的信号。
什么是言语?言语是人们利用语言进行交际的行为和结果,它是个人的意志和智能的行为和结果。
人们说话包括以下三个方面:(1)张口说话的动作,即“说话”的动作、行为,我们称之为言语动作和言语行为。
(2)说话所使用的一套符号,“说话所使用的词语、规则”。
翻译论文
浅谈翻译方法在日常英语中运用随着改革开放的深入,英语对于国人早以不是什么新鲜事物,看看自己住的城市,各个机构有双语名称,大街小巷随处都可以找到英语的招牌,广告语,身边使用的物品,也大都有双语解释,这其中必不可少的是翻译工作。
翻译,是把一种语言表达的意义用另一种语言传达出来,以达到沟通思想情感,传播文化知识,促进社会文明,特别是推动译语文化兴旺昌盛的目的,如此说来,翻译的意义重大,不像有些人想当然的那样简单的将一种语言的译为另一种语言,翻译总是要遵循“忠实”总原则,同时做到“信,达,雅”也不是件易事。
翻译日常生活用语虽然不像不文学作品或文章的整篇段翻译工作量大,但是想要把简短的一句话或者是寥寥几个字翻译的精准传神也不是易事。
本文简要讨论翻译方法在日常英语几个方面中的使用。
商业机构译名超市作为一种方便的购物商店,早已融入国人的生活,每个城市都有超市,常德也不例外,以下是常德比较大型或常见的超市。
步步高百货超市Better Life Mall家润多超市Joindoor Hypermarket大润发超级市场RT-Mart沃尔玛超市Wal-Mart天成爱心超市TClove Supermarket新一佳超市 A Best Supermarket超市名翻译分为两种,一种是有采用音译取字的,如家润多译为Joindoor,Joindoor与自己的中文名音相近,join有进入,加入的意思,意在招揽客户。
Wal-Mart译为“沃尔玛”同样是采用音译的方法。
还有些则采用意译,如步步高,译为Better life,新一佳译为 A Best 。
关于超市的后缀,在街头可以看到稍微有点规模的商品售卖店都冠以Supermarket或者Hypermarket结尾。
Supermarket 一词,a large store where customers can buy many different kinds of food and things for the house(出自朗文高阶字典)。
英语专业翻译方向论文完整版 (1)
石河子大学毕业论文题目:如何处理英翻汉中的省略How to Deal with Ellipsis inEnglish-Chinese Translation院(系):外国语学院专业:英语班级:20095学号:2009051431姓名:指导教师:完成日期: 2013年5月6日ContentsI. Introduction (1)II. Literature Review (2)III. The Principles of Ellipsis (4)A. Omitted words must be useless and unnecessary in the translated works. (5)B. The meaning of the omitted words is implied in the test. (5)C. Omitted words are self-evident. (5)IV. The functions and application of ellipsis (5)A. The Coherence of the Meaning of Expression (6)B. The Coincidence of the Manner of Expression (6)1. Ellipsis of Articles (6)2. Ellipsis of Prepositions (7)3. Ellipsis of Pronouns (7)a. Ellipsis of Personal Pronouns (7)b. Ellipsis of Impersonal Indefinite Pronouns (8)c. Ellipsis of Relative Pronouns (8)4. Ellipsis of Conjunctions (9)a. Ellipsis of Coordinating Conjunctions (9)b. Ellipsis of Subordinate Conjunctions (9)5. Ellipsis of Rhetorics (9)V. Conclusion (10)Works Cited (11)AbstractWith the development of globalization, the world's political, economic and cultural communications are becoming increasingly frequent. Meanwhile, the role of translation cannot be ignored. Due to language and cultural disparity, reasonable translation is particularly important. How to deal with ellipsis in translation is one of the important aspects. The paper will explore ellipsis in English-Chinese translation from five aspects, which are ellipsis of pronouns, conjunctions, articles, prepositions, modifications, so as to achieve the purpose of smoother and clearer communication among China and English-speaking countries.Key words: cultural disparity; translation; ellipsis摘要随着全球化的不断发展,各国之间的政治、经济、文化交流日渐频繁。
英语翻译实践报告论文精选(四篇)
英语翻译实践报告论文精选(四篇)英语翻译实践报告论文篇三怀着感动并期盼的心情20xx年10月8日,我们一行16人,乘着公车来到了xx区新疆学校,开头了为期一个月的实习生活。
在这一个月里,我真正体会到做一位老师责任的重要性,它使我的教学理论变为教学实践,使虚拟教学变为真正的面对面的教学。
与课堂上面对着同学讲课不同,在这里,要求我们的真正力量,最重要的是要有一颗责任心!一个月的实习,令我感慨颇多。
我实习的班级是五班级一班,记得我刚到课室的第一天,班主任陈老师要我和大家讲几句话,我简洁的跟同学们介绍了下自己,并告知他们接下来的一个月会与他们一同度过,同学们赐予了我热闹的掌声,看着眼前一张张真诚并稚嫩的脸,我的心里泛起深深的感动!新疆学校给我们的实践机会特别多,刚到的第一天我就开头了自己的第一堂课。
但是由于阅历不足和应变力量不强第一堂课讲的并不是特别胜利,班主任老师要求我多听课,多向阅历丰富的老师学习。
爱好对于一个学校生来说是至关重要的。
我深知这一点的重要,必需把同学的学习爱好调动起来,使他们在欢乐中主动学习。
无论是上英语还是语文,我都本着work hard,play harder的理念,以欢乐教学的方式,把嬉戏和教学融为一体,教他们唱英语儿歌,一个月的时间里,我教会了他们四首英文儿歌,同学的学习态度由“要我学”转化为了“我要学”。
学校五班级又是毕业班级,除了要求提高他们对学习的爱好,更重要的还是在于成果的要求,所以,在胜利提高同学的学习爱好之后,我又转变把战略变为力量教学,应校长的要求,教给他们一些生活化的英语口语,于是,我把目标索定了“美国俚语”这一环节,每天晚上回家的第一任务,就是翻查资料,找到适合于他们的一些美国俚语,比如“where can i wash my hands?” “may i have your name?” “where to?” 等。
在课堂上大家都很期盼“美国俚语”的环节,同学们都说:这样的英语既好玩又有用!一个月的时间,他们的口语有了明显的提高,无论课上还是课下,同学都会用“hello ada,goodmorning”的方式和我问好,看着他们有这样的成果,我想,我胜利了!此外,由于班主任的信任,我除了英语教学以外,还负责全学年的语文写作课程,一个月的时间里,作文讲解课10余堂,同学们由原来一篇作文100多字增长到400字左右,对作文的爱好也大大提高,课下同学主动找到我说:老师,我现在觉得作文一点都不难!听到这样的话语,我真的兴奋极了。
关于翻译的论文
关于翻译的论文翻译是一门复杂而又有趣的跨文化交流工具。
在当今全球化的社会中,翻译已经成为沟通各个国家和地区之间的桥梁。
在学术研究中,翻译的重要性不言而喻。
翻译涉及到多种语言的对比和转换,以及对不同文化、社会和历史背景的理解和适应。
本文将探讨翻译的定义、类型和挑战,并进一步讨论翻译在学术研究中的应用。
首先,翻译是将一种语言的文字或口头表达转换成另一种语言的过程。
它不仅仅是简单地转换单词和句子,还包括了对语言和文化背景的理解和应用。
翻译的类型可以分为口译和笔译。
口译是指在实时对话中进行的翻译,而笔译是指将书面材料从一种语言翻译成另一种语言的过程。
翻译的挑战在于对语言的准确理解和表达。
不同语言之间有着不同的语法结构、词汇和语言习惯。
因此,翻译必须在尊重原文的基础上,进行适当的调整和转换,以使翻译的文字更符合目标语言的表达习惯和文化背景。
此外,不同语言有不同的语调、语气和表达方式,这也是翻译的挑战之一。
在翻译过程中,译者必须处理好语言的细微差别,以确保翻译的准确性和流畅性。
在学术研究领域,翻译起着至关重要的作用。
学术研究要求与各种语言的文献进行交流和对比。
翻译是学术研究中不可或缺的一部分,它使研究者能够获取到各种语言的重要信息和研究结果。
通过翻译,研究者可以更好地了解其他学者的观点和研究成果,并将这些成果与自己的研究相结合。
翻译还有助于促进不同学术领域之间的交流和合作,使学术研究更加全面和多样化。
然而,在学术研究中进行翻译也存在一些挑战。
一方面,对于专业术语和特定领域的翻译,译者需要具备丰富的专业知识和术语库,以确保翻译的准确性和专业性。
另一方面,翻译还需要考虑到每种语言的不同风格和表达方式,在保持准确性的同时,使翻译语句更具有自然和流畅的特点。
此外,学术研究文献的翻译还要考虑到行文风格、结构和逻辑的转换,以适应目标语言的读者。
总结来说,翻译在学术研究中起着极其重要的作用。
它不仅是学者之间交流的桥梁,也是不同语言和文化之间相互理解和融合的工具。
关于英汉翻译论文范文
关于英汉翻译论文范文浅谈英汉翻译、英汉语言特点对比【摘要】在当今日趋全球化的时代里,翻译在跨文化、跨民族之间的交流和合作中功不可没,它既是语言之间的相互转换,同时也是不同文化间的交流。
事实上,翻译已经成为了一种普遍性的活动,当今的人们直接或者间接都有意或无意地从事着翻译活动。
【关键词】翻译语系形合意合英语和汉语分属于不同语系,英语属于印欧语系Indo-European language Family,是拼音语言,而汉语属于汉藏语系Chinese-Tibetan language family,是表意的语言ideography,所分属的语系不同也就导致了英汉两种语言的差别。
对于广大应试四、六级的考生来说,如果平时学习中了解英汉语言特点,在翻译应试中能满足翻译标准――“信、达、雅”即忠实准确、通顺流畅和贴切原文,这对于想要取得较高翻译分数会有很大帮助,下面本文就将对英汉语言的特点从下几个方面作对比。
一、英语的形合和汉语的意合相对于汉语来说,英语是一种更加注重形式化的语言,主要体现在运用词汇来联系各个分句,如我们熟知的“and”用来表示并列连接;“if”用来表示假设条件关系;“because”用来表示因果关系,虽然说汉语句式也有一定数量的连接词连接,但是使用频率较之英语小得多。
在汉语中,我们通常不用或者少用连接词来表达意思,英汉两种语言的这种区别就是我们所说的形合――强调结构的完整性和形态的严谨性,结构严密紧凑,主次分明;意合――强调内容和表意的完整性,靠语意的逻辑将句子串起。
为了更加清楚明了,我们试举几个例句:1跑得了和尚,但是跑不了庙。
The monks may run away,but the temple cannot run away with him.2Althoughhe has aged physically, he remains young at heart.尽管他人老但是心不老。
本科毕业论文关于英文翻译
本科毕业论文关于英文翻译自改革开放以来,不同国家的人急于了解他国的文化,电影作为跨文化交流的一种方式,为电影界迎来了春天。
下文是店铺为大家整理的关于本科英文翻译毕业论文的范文,欢迎大家阅读参考!本科英文翻译毕业论文篇1英文电影片名翻译初探摘要:电影作为一种艺术形式,深受大众喜爱。
国与国之间的文化交流,电影也是一个重要组成部分。
把国内的好影片介绍出去,把国外的好影片引进来,翻译是重要一环,而首先吸引观众的就是片名。
片名的翻译起着重要的作用。
翻译片名,要以传递信息和唤起美感为目的。
在文字转移过程中,应切实保留原作的信息价值和美学价值。
既要忠于原片内容,还要注意文字优美、言简意赅,具有强烈的吸引力和感染力,本文针对目前英文电影片名翻译的现状,对英文电影片名翻译的有关理论展开讨论,同时提出了翻译片名的几种基本方法。
关键词:电影;英文电影;片名翻译;方法电影是人们喜闻乐见的艺术形式,它能传播信息、抒发感情、反映丰富多彩的生活。
给人们带来艺术上的享受。
一部好的影片之所以能吸引成千上万的观众,除了演员的精湛演技、富有哲理的对话以及绚丽多彩的画面外,与其寓意深刻、回味无穷的片名有着直接的联系。
片名,是影视片的品牌商标,看似简单却是作者颇费神思的产物,寥寥数词凝聚着整个作品的精髓。
电影片名翻译是一项重要而富于创造性的工作。
佳译能够为影片锦上添花。
对丰富国内观众业余文化生活,促进国际间文化艺术交流起到不可忽视的作用。
翻译片名大多直译,形式与内容皆相似,朴实明了又贴切。
但是片名的翻译也是语际交流,是不同文化之间的交流。
观众对象不同,文化和欣赏习惯也有差异,原语与译语的表达方式和习惯有同有异。
片名翻译时,也应深入理解影片的内容蕴涵和风格,揣摩措词用语,力求准确把握原语与译语的表层意义和联想意义,既要考虑对等,更要考虑到译名的传意性和可接受性。
一、英文电影片名翻译现状(一)一片多名的问题日前,电影片名翻译中存在着混乱、不规范的现象,一片多名的问题较突出。
翻译概论 期末论文
如何在多元文化语境下认识翻译与研究翻译当今,世界经济快速发展,世界化进程不断加速,面对经济一体化的强势势头,“维护文化多样性”的问题被更加严峻地提了出来。
而在多元文化语境下,翻译对不同文化间的相互了解、互为尊重、互为补充的重要作用显而易见,本文主要探讨在当今时代,翻译所应具有的精神和所肩负的使命;同时也将对如何进一步深化翻译研究进行讨论。
一、国内外翻译发展现状1、翻译发展过程中的两次转向在翻译研究的历程中,主要先后经历了“语言学转向”和“文学转向”。
这两次转向为我们全面理解翻译、认识翻译提供了新的视角与可能性。
同时,这两次转向也为我们更为深刻地理解“语言”与“文化”这两个概念、从而更好地把握这两者之间的关系提供了全新的角度。
这两次转向让我们更加清晰地认识到预言师文化的重要组成部分,语言是文化的载体,语言并不是一种操作性的被动工具,而是具有能动的创造作用。
正是在这个意义上,我们把语言的多样性和文化的多样性是作为人类共同的遗产。
2、国内翻译研究发展中的几种倾向回顾中国三十多年的翻译研究发展史,主要存在着几种引人深思的翻译倾向:1)重技轻道这一倾向主要体现在两方面:一是从翻译研究问世的成果来看,对翻译技巧的探讨占很大比重,而对翻译的形而上的研究则很少。
二是表现在翻译研究的观念层面上。
由于对翻译技巧的重视,导致了翻译研究的实用主义态度,这样局限了翻译理论的范围,把理论的功能简单化了。
2)重语言轻文化这一现象特别表现在20世纪的70年代后期和80年代,原因有多方面。
就翻译的具体操作层面上,语言转化是翻译活动最直接的一种行为。
长期以来把翻译活动当作纯粹语言转化活动的简单主义翻译观对人们的翻译研究有着观念上的影响,在研究中重视语言层面的转化成了一种必然。
这一倾向还与我们在借鉴西方翻译过程中所受的影响直接相关。
3)重微观轻宏观这一倾向突出地表现在两个研究领域:翻译研究史领域记忆翻译批评领域。
这种“见树不见林”的研究方法遮蔽了人们对翻译的文化特质的认识。
翻译实践报告毕业论文
翻译实践报告毕业论文在大学生活的最后一年,我选择了进行一项研究项目——翻译实践报告毕业论文。
这个项目既是对我所学的翻译理论知识的应用与实践,也是对我个人英语水平和翻译能力的一次考验。
研究的主题是文学翻译中的文化转译。
我选取了一篇中国现代散文作品进行翻译,并将其中的文化元素转译成目标文化的表达方式。
在这个过程中,我深刻体会到了翻译的复杂性和挑战性。
首先,对于文学作品的翻译来说,最重要的是准确传递原文中的思想和情感。
在进行翻译时,我不仅要理解作者的用词和句法结构,还要理解作者的创作意图和文化背景。
只有在全面理解原文的基础上,我才能准确地传达作者的思想和情感。
其次,文学作品中常常涉及到文化元素,如习俗、传统、历史背景等。
在翻译过程中,我不仅要将原文的文化元素转译成目标文化的表达方式,还要确保转译后的表达方式能在目标文化中传达相同的意义和情感。
这就要求我对目标文化有深入的了解,以便选择适当的表达方式。
此外,对于文学作品的翻译来说,语言风格和文体的保持也至关重要。
每个作家都有独特的写作风格和文体,这是他们艺术创作的重要特征。
在翻译时,我要尽力保持原文的语言风格和文体,使读者能够感受到作者的独特魅力。
在进行翻译实践的过程中,我遇到了许多困难和挑战。
首先,文学作品的表达方式往往是抽象而隐喻的,这给翻译带来了很大的困难。
我需要将作者的抽象形象和隐喻意义准确地转译成目标文化的具体形象和意义,这要求我有较高的语言驾驭能力和创造力。
其次,文学作品的翻译需要一定的决策能力。
在翻译过程中,我常常面临多种表达方式的选择。
我需要在准确传达原文意义的基础上,考虑目标读者的接受能力和审美观点,并选择最合适的表达方式。
这就要求我有较好的语言判断和决策能力。
最后,在翻译实践中我也收获了很多。
通过与教授和同学的讨论和反思,我对翻译理论有了更深入的了解,并提高了自己的翻译能力。
我也学会了在短时间内高效地组织和完成一项大型翻译项目,这对我今后的工作和学习都有很大的帮助。
翻译实践论文
翻译实践论文翻译是一项艰巨而重要的任务,在全球化的时代中,跨语言交流变得越来越频繁和必要。
翻译实践作为一个学术领域,旨在研究翻译过程和技巧,培养专业翻译人才,促进不同文化间的相互理解。
本论文将探讨翻译实践的重要性和挑战,并提供一些建议以提高翻译质量和效率。
一、翻译的重要性翻译在国际交流中起着至关重要的作用。
首先,它有助于促进不同国家和地区的经济合作。
通过翻译,各国之间能够更好地理解对方的商业需求和市场情况,从而加强合作与交流。
其次,翻译也有助于文化交流。
通过翻译,不同的文学作品、电影、音乐等可以被更广泛地传播和理解,帮助人们更好地了解和欣赏其他文化。
最后,翻译还有助于促进政治和外交关系的发展。
政府间的文件、演讲以及国际组织的文件,需要进行准确翻译才能实现沟通和协作。
然而,翻译也面临着许多挑战和困难。
二、翻译的挑战与困难1.语言差异:不同语言之间存在很大的差异,不仅在词汇和语法上有所不同,甚至在表达方式、文化背景和习惯等方面也存在差异,这给翻译带来了困难。
2.文化差异:翻译涉及到不同文化之间的交流,文化背景的差异经常会导致翻译不准确或者难以理解。
翻译人员需要了解两种语言背后的文化内涵,才能更好地传递信息。
3.专业知识:某些领域的翻译需要掌握丰富的专业知识,例如医学、法律、金融等。
没有相关专业知识的翻译人员可能难以准确翻译特定领域的文件。
4.时效性:有时翻译任务需要在严格的时间限制内完成,这对翻译人员的工作效率和应变能力提出了更高的要求。
为了应对这些挑战和困难,翻译人员需要不断提升自己的翻译技巧和知识水平。
三、提高翻译质量和效率的方法1.语言学习:熟练掌握源语言和目标语言之间的语法、词汇和表达方式,是提高翻译质量的基础。
通过不断学习和练习,翻译人员可以更好地理解和准确表达信息。
2.积累专业知识:对于特定领域的翻译,翻译人员应该积累相关的专业知识,包括行业术语、规范和最新发展。
这可以帮助翻译人员更好地理解和准确传达特定领域的信息。
翻译实践报告论文
翻译实践报告论文摘要本报告详细介绍了我在翻译实践中的经历和体会。
该翻译实践报告论文主要包括三个方面的内容:翻译实践的背景与目的、关键步骤以及总结与体会。
通过这次翻译实践,我对翻译工作的重要性和挑战有了更深入的理解,并且提高了我的翻译能力。
1. 翻译实践的背景与目的翻译作为一项重要的跨文化交流工具,在全球化时代扮演着重要的角色。
翻译不仅仅是将源语言转化为目标语言,更重要的是传达准确的信息和文化内涵。
因此,进行翻译实践是培养翻译专业人才的重要手段之一。
本次翻译实践的背景是为了提高我的翻译能力,为今后从事相关翻译工作打下基础。
通过参与实际的翻译项目,我可以更好地了解翻译过程中可能遇到的问题,并通过实践提高我的翻译技巧和准确性。
2. 关键步骤在翻译实践中,我遵循了以下关键步骤:2.1 文本理解首先,我花费了大量时间阅读和理解原文。
对于生词和不熟悉的概念,我进行了专门的研究和学习。
确保对原文的准确理解是进行翻译的基础。
2.2 语言转换在理解原文后,我开始将源语言转化为目标语言。
这一过程中,我注意到词汇和语法的差异,以保持翻译的准确性和流畅性。
我还尽量使用简洁明了的语言,以确保读者能够更好地理解翻译的内容。
2.3 校对与修改翻译完成后,我进行了校对和修改工作。
通过检查语法、拼写和标点符号的准确性,我确保翻译文本没有任何错误。
同时,我还特别留意了语言表达的准确性和一致性,以确保翻译的质量。
2.4 提交与反馈最后,我将翻译文本提交给相关人员进行评估和反馈。
通过接受反馈意见,我进一步改进了我的翻译技巧和方法,提高了我的翻译水平。
3. 总结与体会通过这次翻译实践,我有了许多宝贵的经验和体会。
首先,我意识到翻译过程中准确理解原文的重要性。
只有确保原文的理解准确,才能进行准确的翻译。
其次,语言转换的过程中要注意词汇和语法的差异。
不同语言之间存在着差异,我们需要熟悉这些差异,并灵活运用翻译技巧来保持翻译的准确性。
此外,翻译过程中的反复校对和修改是必不可少的。
英语翻译论文范文
英语翻译论文范文In the contemporary era, the role of technology in education is undeniably significant. The integration of digital tools and platforms has transformed the way educators teach and students learn. This paper aims to explore the multifaceted impact of technology on modern education, focusing on bothits advantages and challenges.Firstly, technology has democratized access to education. With the proliferation of online learning platforms, students from diverse backgrounds can access a wealth of educational resources. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have made it possible for individuals to learn from renowned professors without the constraints of geographical location or financial limitations.Secondly, the use of technology in classrooms has enhanced the interactive and collaborative nature of learning. Interactive whiteboards, educational apps, and virtualreality (VR) are some of the tools that have made learning more engaging and immersive. These tools not only cater to different learning styles but also promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills.However, the integration of technology in education is not without its drawbacks. One of the primary concerns is the digital divide, where unequal access to technology can exacerbate existing educational disparities. Additionally,there is a risk of students becoming overly reliant on technology, potentially neglecting the development of essential skills such as critical reading and analytical thinking.Furthermore, the rapid pace of technological advancement presents challenges for educators. It requires continuous professional development to stay abreast of new tools and pedagogical approaches. The balance between traditional teaching methods and technology-assisted learning must be carefully considered to ensure that the educational experience remains holistic and well-rounded.In conclusion, technology has undeniably reshaped the landscape of modern education. While it offers numerous opportunities for enhancing learning experiences, it also presents challenges that need to be addressed. The key lies in harnessing the power of technology to supplement, not supplant, the educational process, ensuring that it serves as a tool for empowering students to become lifelong learners.。
关于英语翻译方向的论文范文
翻译在跨文化、跨民族之间的交流和合作中功不可没,英语翻译,它既是语言之间的相互转换,同时也是不同文化间的交流。
下文是为大家整理的英语翻译的论文的范文,欢迎大家阅读参考!英语翻译的论文篇1文化空缺与英汉翻译摘要:不同民族的语言产生于不同的文化背景,所承载的文化也不尽相同,这就必然导致两种语言在表达方式上存在很多相异之处,文化空缺就是这些差异的极端表现,它是一个民族语言和文化与其它民族语言和文化的异质性的充分体现,这无疑增加了翻译的难度。
所以文化空缺的翻译不仅是语言的迁移,更是文化的传播。
关键词:文化空缺英汉翻译翻译作为人类最早进行的交流活动之一,一直在不同的语言集团间沟通信息,对人类社会的发展和进步有非常重要的作用。
正是由于翻译所起的中介作用,民族间才可以互通有无、互相学习、共同发展。
跨文化交际学和文化语言学的兴起与发展,为语言与文化的研究带来了勃勃生机。
而作为跨文化交际的翻译,也因此而更加受到重视,对它的研究也呈现出多角度、多侧面、开放性的特点。
翻译作为不同语言之间人们交流思想和文化不可或缺的手段,在传播文化信息、促进不同民族间的相互了解与民族融合的过程中的重要作用已日益凸显。
翻译界对翻译理论研究的重心从译意到译信息再到以文化为导向的翻译,正说明翻译实质是文化的翻译。
如Banet&ameacroagreatmanoungfriend,2Brightanddiigent,3Doeceedingweintudie,4buttheareratherweainChinee,5evencan’,the’athearenotinteretedinChinee请看张培基先生的译文:Ihavecomeacroagreatmanbrightanddiigentoungfriendwhoha vedoneeceedingweintheirtudie,,theaidthewerenotinteretedintheChineeanguage英语的从句前必须根据其语法功能用when,where,who,that,的一种表现。
课 程 论 文 翻译 nida
河海大学课程论文奈达的“功能对等”理论—对英汉翻译的可译性研究姓名:余兴园学号:1031701022方向:翻译学导师:孙宁宁HoHai UniversityThesis of Course of the Theory and Practice ofT ranslationFunctional Equivalence of Dr. Nid a—A Study on the Translatability inE—C TranslationBy YU XingyuanNO: 1031701022Supervisor: Prof. Sun Ningning内容摘要可译性及不可译性的问题一直是翻译界争论的话题。
随着翻译的发展,二者争论的焦点也不断由翻译的可能性转化为可译性的程度问题。
笔者认为文章在总体上是可译的。
可译性及不可译性只是一个相对的概念,没有绝对的不可译性。
可译性及不可译性事实上只是可译的程度问题。
美国著名的翻译家,语言学家尤金·奈达也是语言的共性论者,他坚持认为:一种语言所能表达的事情,必然能用另一种语言来表达。
尤其是二十世纪六十年代,他提出了“功能对等”理论,并以此为理论原则指导圣经翻译工作,翻译出更适合现代读者的圣经版本,为翻译的研究开辟了新的视野。
本文基于奈达的“功能对等”理论,对英汉翻译的可译性进行研究。
这项研究有助于更好的了解翻译的本质及一些翻译方法。
对于这些概念的了解会有助于指导翻译实践。
论文可以分为四个部分。
第一部分主要介绍了奈达及他的翻译理论;第二部分重点阐述了论文中翻译可译性的理论基础—“功能对等”;第三部分中笔者将理论转化为实践,探讨实践中可译程度较低的实例并找出其更好的可译性方法。
第四部分是论文的总结部分。
得出结论—文章在总体上是可译的,只是可译性程度高低问题;并以此提出译者的任务问题。
关键词:可译性;尤金·奈达;“功能对等”;译者的任务AbstractThe topic of translatability and untranslatability is a long-debated issue in translation field. Its history has accompanied the development of translation theory and practice. With the development of translation theory, the focus of the debate has shifted from the possibility of translation to the degree of the translatability. The study maintains that the writings are translatable as a whole. Translatability and untranslatability are relative concepts and there is no absolute translatability and untranslatability. The matter of translatability and untranslatability is actually the matter of the degree of translatability rather than the possibility of translation.Nida, a distinguished contemporary translation theorist and linguist in the west, is also a language universalist. In 1960’s he proposed a translation principle called “Dynamic(Functional) Equival ence” and guided his Bible translation works in the American Bible society. This version soon became popular in the world because of its clear, simple and natural language. Ni da’s translation theory exerted a tremendous influence on translation studies and boarded a new horizon on the studies of translation theory.The whole studies help us get more about the essence, the criteria and methods of translating which undoubtedly benefit our translation practice. The thesis includes four parts .The first part mainly introduces the life of Nida and his theory on translatability. The second part discusses translatability based on the criteria of “Functional Equivalence”. The third part shifts from the theory to the practice and find some ways to translate the low- degree translatability writings more perfectly. The last part of the thesis is the conclusion that translatability is absolute and the task of translator is also mentioned.Key W ords: translatability; Nida; “Functional Equivalence”; the task of translatorContents0.Introduction.........................................................................................................1. Nida and His Theory of Translatability to Translation. ...........1.1 Brief-introduction to Nida…………………………………1.2 Nida's Theory of Translatability to Translation………………2. The Criteria of Translating—Functional Equivalence …2.1 The Criteria of Translating……………………………………..2.2 The Development Steps of Functional Equivalence………………2.3 The Essence of Functional Equivalence…………………………..3. Application of the Criteria of Translating to Solve the Problems of Translating Practice ...................................................3.1 Pun…………………………………………………….3.2 Nonce Words………………………………………………….3.3 Word Play………………………………………………………..3.4 Word Riddle………………………………………………………3.5 Rhyming Scheme………………………………………………4. Conclusion ...................................................................................... Bibliography .......................................................................................0. IntroductionThe topic of translatability and untranslatability is a long-debated issue in translation field. Its history has accompanied the development of translation theory and practice. The early period of the debate is mainly focused on whether writings are translatable or untranslatable. As the central and basic issue in translation,it has attracted much attention and has aroused much interest in translation circles in China and abroad because of the many different opinions upon it. These opinions can be divided as two contrary sides: one supports translatability while the other favors untranslatability. Almost all the Translation scholars have proposed their opinions on this issue,whether for translatability or for untranslaiability.Lin Yutang in his On Translation once quoted Croce’s words“All the pure artistic works are untranslatable ,”and he also added“The top poems(especially the lyric poems) are untranslatable,be it Chinese or western,ancient or modern. The reason is that it is the load of the elite words of a specific language,and if it acts as the instinct connection between the authors’ ideals and words, the translation from,its original language to another one amounts to the loss of the Poem’s original taste,so the translation version can not be called as Poem.”(Zhou Yi. Luo Ping,1999:68) Wang Yizhu said in his Untranslaiability of Poems“frankly speaking,in my opinion,poems are untranslatable for the reason are simple: its taste,context or more popularly speaking,its flavor while makes a Poem is dissolved in the language Poets use to a large degree and it is difficult to convey through another language or dialect.”(Zhou Yi, Luo Ping,1999:69).To sum up the opinions of preceding scholars,we can find something in common in their opinion s—some writings are untranslatable such as poems,1iterary style and some rhetorical forms.The theorists who favor the view of translatability say the opposite. They think writings are translatable,even those such as poems,literary style and specific rhetorical forms that are considered as untranslatable by theorists favoring untranslatability. For the untranslatability of poems, Cheng Fangwu once opposed as “translation of poems is not an impossible task, according to my experience,some poems firstly seeming difficult to translate can also be completely translated through deep consideration. Therefore the translatability of poems depend on the translating ability and efforts. Something that is expressed in language of one country can always be translated into that of another country by using some proper methods.” (Zhou Yi. Luo Ping, 1998:70).For the untranslatability of special rhetorical forms Xu Yuanchong Said “even the context of allusion or pun are not absolutely untranslatable if methods aresuitable.” (Zhou Yi. Luo Ping,1999:71).Of all the views of translatability in abroad,Nida proposed the most typical one from the point of internal structure of Language. Through a detailed study of the nature of meaning Nida founds that language can prove to be an adequate tool to express all and any aspects of human experience. It is a fact that the mapping of experience by language is limited to specific cultures and People do not talk about things of which they are no aware,however,when some Part of their experience arises forma level to an overt level,they are able to speak it just as can describe new objects that enter into their experience. (Nida, 1964:50) This gives us that the language has the potential to describe new objects and concepts that arise in the evolution of their experience and concepts that come from other culture. This paves up the foundation of translatability rather than untranslatability.With the development of the theory of translation studies, a growing number of theorists who have a more reasonable and complete views on the translatability and untranslatability is applied. First, translatability and untranslatability are relative concepts and there is no absolute translatability and untranslatability. The matter of translatability and untranslatability is actually the matter of the degree of translatability rather than the possibility of translation. Second, with the globalization of the world, translatability is the main trend.As mentioned above, we should grape more about the essence, the criteria and methods of translating that will guide our practice more perfectly. I hope this study will help us know more about translation theory and grope a new respect on translation practice.1. Nida and His Theory of Translatability to TranslationEugene A. Nida, a distinguished American translation theorist and translator whose important position in the study of translation is established in the1960s, influences the whole western translation theory field. His translation theory began to be introduced into China in the early 1980s and quickly accepted by many Chinese translators and Chinese translation theorists.From1945 to 1997,he authored or co-authored more than 40 books and 250 articles on linguistics, semantics and translation. He is praised as the ever-green scholar by translators and critics.1.1Brief-introduction to NidaNida,Eugene Albert Nida in full, was born on November 11, 1914, in Oklahoma City of the U.S. His family moved to Long Beach, California when he was 5 years old. He began studying Latin in high school and was already looking forward to being able to translate scripture as a missionary. By the time he received his Bachelor degree in 1936 from the University of California at Los Angeles, he was well on his way. Having earned his degree in Greek, summa cum laude, he enrolled in the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL). Nida then pursued a Master's degree in Greek New Testament at the University of Southern California. In 1941 he began a Ph.D. in Linguistics at the University of Michigan and completed it in two years. His dissertation, A Synopsis of English Syntax under the academic guidance of the distinguished Professors Charles C. Fries,Leonard Bloomfield and Edgar H. Sturtevant,was at that time, the only full-scale analysis of a major language according to the “immediate constituent” theory.After Nida got his Ph.D. in linguistics,he was soon employed in1943 by the American Bible Society to check and value the publication of Bibles. He actively took part in academic research concerning translation theory and modern linguistics. Then he was determined to produce a theory that would foster effective communication of the Good News across all kinds of cultural and linguistics barriers. His book Toward a Science of Translating (1964),and later The Theory and Practice of Translation (1969) helped him achieve this object. Nida has exerted great influence on modern linguistics and translation theory. We will discuss one of his most important theory on translation—Functional Equivalence on Chapter Two in detail.1.2Nida's Theory of Translatability to TranslationIn the history of translation theory, one of the central problems is the question of translatability and untranslatability of a text. Nida states that anything said in one language can be said in another.Through a detailed study of the nature of meaning,Nida finds that language can prove to be an adequate tool to express all and any aspects of human experience. It is a fact that the mapping of experience by language is limited to specific cultures and people do not talk about things of which they are not ware.However,when some of their experience arises from a covert lever an overtlevel,they are able to speak it just as they can describe new objects that enter into their experience(Nida,1964:50).This means that any language has the potential to describe new objects and concepts that come from other cultures.Nida’s translatability theory is based upon his two premises:the freedom of languages as symbols and the existence of the universal human experience. To Nida,“Linguistic symbols are semantically free to expand,to contract,to shift their contents,to die,and to be revived. This freedom is of inestimable value,for only through such freedom can persons employ symbols in new combinations or use them to describe objects which are new to the experience of speech community”(Nida,1964:49) This freedom of symbols means not only that a language can be used to describe new objects which come into the culture,but also that a person can introduce new concept into a speech community by using verb symbols with certain contextual restrictions and amplifications.For Nida,what makes human communication possible is that all human beings share common cultural experience which transcends the seeming difference that exists between people speaking different language s and living in different cultural backgrounds. This universal human experience is the underlying base that makes human communication possible.Moreover, the freedom of language also enables it to express new concepts from other culture.Nida gives an example to illustrate how people who have no snow can understand a passage in the Bible that speaks about “white as snow”.If the people do not know snow,how can they have a word for it?And if they do not have a word for it,then how can the Bible be translated?Nida answers these questions as follows:In the first Place,many people have a word for snow,even if they have not themselves experienced it,for they have heard about this phenomenon. Secondly, in other instances,people do not know snow but they do have “frost”and they speak about the two with the same term. Thirdly, many languages have the same idioms, e.g., “white as egret feathers”or“white as fungus”or they may use a no metaphor to express the concept“white as snow”such as“very white”(Nida and Taber, 1982:4) This common or universal human experience is the crucial concept in Nida,translation theory.Nida’s concept of“universal”is pragmatic and functional which sees language in a larger context of culture.This kind of perspective enriches the traditional concept of universality of language,and offers new insights into the nature of translation. With this universal human experience,a high degree of effective translatability between languagesand cultures is made possible.2. The Criteria of Translating—Functional EquivalenceTo find the criteria of translating, we should know the definition of translation first. Translation may be defined as follows: the replacement of textual material in one language (SL.) by equivalent textual material in another language (TL.).”and “Translation consists in the reproduction in the receptor language of the source language understood the original message.”(Nida, 1985, quoted in Liu Miqing, 1990:33) According to Liu Miqing, in fact, the essence of translating is the interlingual transmission of meaning. To grape the meaning correctly, the criteria of translating is very important. Actually the criteria of translating are directly influenced by the understanding of the essence of translation and the methods using in translation practice.2.1 The Criteria of TranslatingChinese and western criteria focus respectively on the text and on the readship, though this division is not absolute. Many Chinese hold views of “Equivalence of Effects”, such as Ma Jianzhong, Qu Qiubai, Zhao Yuanren and Mao Dun.Among the criteria put forward by scholars at home and abroad, the famous ones in China are “Faithfulness, Intelligibility and Elegance”by Y an Fu. “Likeness in Spirit” by Fu Lei, “Sublimation” by Qian Zhongshu, etc. In the west, John Dryden’s idea of translating criteria is well known, and he regards: “I have endeavored to make Vigil speak such English as he would himself have spoken, if he had been born in England, and in this present age.”( Quoted in Bassnett·McGuir,1980:447). The most important famous one is “Functional Equivalence” by Nida.2.2 The Development Steps of Functional Equivalence“Translation Equivalence”has been an essential issue in modern western translation studies. The term “Equivalence”in translation first appears in Rieu’s writing, which was called “the principle of equivalent effect”.(Rieu 1953:554).Nida’s translation theory has been regarded as “equivalence theory”, “equivalent effect theory” or “functional equivalence” in China.Nida argued that there are two different types of equivalence, namely formal equivalence and dynamic equivalence, which later advanced to “functional equivalence”. We should know Nida first puts forward “dynamic equivalence”in opposition to “formal equivalence”in 1964. In 1990s, Nida said that the real issue was in defining the nature of equivalence, and stressed more than once that it was impossible to achieve absolute “‘equivalence’in translating.(Nida,1995). Later on, he said emphatically, “equivalence”can not be understood in its mathematical meaning of identity, but in terms of proximity, i.e. on the basis of degrees of closeness to functional identity”, then he proposed “functional equivalence”(Nida 1993:117).2.3 The Essence of Functional EquivalenceTo get complete understanding of the essence of “functional equivalence”, we should pay attention to the following points: first, Nida put forward “dynamic equivalence”in opposition to “formal equivalence”in the beginning. Second, “equivalence”in Nida’s theory never means absolute sameness. Third, “equivalence”can not be understood in its mathematical meaning of identity, but in terms of proximity.In translation theory, “formal equivalence”refers to translating by finding reasonably equivalent words and phrases while following the forms of the source language as closely as possible. It is often referred to as "literal translation." While Nida’s “functional equivalence”is a translation method in which the translator attempts to reflect the thought of the writer in the source language rather than the words and forms. The translator will read a sentence or other unit of thought, try to understand it as well as possible, and then write that thought in the target language. The forms of the source language are not important, because they are not the same as the forms of the target language.The theory of “functional equivalence” makes the point that the translator should make his audience understand the version in the original receptors to the original text. The acceptability of a version depends on the translator’s reproducing of the original functions. Ida generalizes language functions as: related to the source- expressive and cognitive functions; related to receptors-informative, imperative, performative and emotive; related to the source to receptor-interpersonal.(Nida, 1988:145).We know that translation practice is complicated. In order to come to achieve functional equivalence, methods of translating have to be pluralized according to various conditions. Nida points out that the two basic conflicts in translation history are literal vs. free translating and emphasis on form vs. concentration on content (Nida, 1986:74.).It also indicates the problem of literal translating or free translating. The two methods in fact have their own advantages and limitations. Methods of adaptation must be adopted flexibly according to the environment of each practical problem.Then we can use two methods in cooperation .All methods and adaptation are aiming at equivalence, and they should be flexibly adopted in accordance with each specific condition in practice. The next part can help you understand this part.3. Application of the Criteria of Translating to Solve theProblems of Translating Practice.This section includes two parts: first, list some problems in translating practice in E-C translation and its specific translation technique. Second, provide five basic principles in the solution to the problems deriving from specific translation technique.Since problems in practice of translation mainly from the unique feature in language and culture such as pun, nonce word, alliteration and word play etc.All these cases will be briefly introduced and some valuable techniques in translation are expected be found.3.1 PunPun refers to an amusing use of a word or phrase that has two meanings, or of word with the same sound but different meanings. For example “separate pear, separate pair”“分梨, 分离”fully shows the universals between languages.Pun can be divided into consonation pun and meaning pun.As their meaning indicate,the former refers to words of two meaning and the later refers to words of the same sound but different meanings. For meaning pun, the example is as follows:Romeo: What have thou found?Mercutio: No hare, Sir.译文:罗:你发现了什么?墨:倒不是野鸡,先生。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Semantic translation and Communicative translationPeter Newmark was the well-known translator and theorist. He absorbed the experience summed by predecessors and research production. Meanwhile ,he linked his practice in t with the previous theory to publish a book whose name was approaches to translation in t in 1981.In this famous book, Newmark advanced two new translation methods which were semantic translation and communicative translation. These two new concepts were easy to understand and creat a new way to research the theory of translation. So they were known as Peter Newmark’s greatest contribution in translation.So what is semantic translation and communicative translation? From Newmark’s perspective ,he held the point that semantic translation attempts to render, as closely as the semantic and syntactic structures of the second language allow, the exact contextual meaning of the original while communicative translation attempts to produce to that obtained the readers of the original.After having seven classes of translation theory and techniques,I have some views on semantic translation and communicativetranslation. My understanding on semantic translation is that semantic translation is deeply based on the source text, that is to say, it is source-oriented, author-centered, and pragmatic.Using this translation method, the translator should value the form of the source text as well as the original intention of the author. Because of the requisition that target text should close to the source text in structures and words, the method emphasize on the transmission of information and the accuracy. It is somewhat like liberal translation or foreignizing translation. But in my opinion, the semantic translation collects the advantages of the word to word translation, liberal translation and loyal translation. However, it goes without saying that semantic translation also has its disadvantages because it has too much limitation. For all I know, Communicative translation is a convenient way to translate one language to another. Compared to semantic translation, communicative translation is target-oriented, reader-centered and idiomatic. As readers, they want to read a foreign book smoothly and without any difficulty. But the difference of culture will make them puzzled and confused----that is why we should take communicative translation strategy to translate foreign works. The core of communicative translation is readers, so this method attaches a great deal importance to the reader’s understanding and reaction, which means that it thinks highly of the transmission of function and effect. It require translator to organize thestructures again for the purpose of making the target text more smooth and idiomatic. Additionally, it absorbed the advantages of domesticating translation, free translation and idiomatic translation. So it is accepted by most translators.The follow is that what is the difference and association between semantic translation and communicative translation?There is no doubt that most obvious difference is the key point they emphasize. Surely, semantic translation focuses on the source text and author’s culture while communicative translation concentrates on target text and the reader’s culture. Farther more, semantic translation is objective and accurate, but communicative translation is subjective and direct. To make a long story short, semantic translation is based on the original text culture to a certain extend and communicative translation is not restrained by the original text culture.Although they have a wide variety of differences in many concepts, they are not the stranger to each other because they often meet in the target text. In other words, they are not totally unrelated and they can’t be separated in translation. In a target text, there is not pure semantic translation or communicative translation but the interaction of both. Personally speaking, I support that the combination of both is the ideal translation method. Therefore, onlyin applying these two methods flexibly can a translator produce a high-quality work.Then, the next question is that when should we apply these methods in translating?Because of the convenience of the communicative translation, most of the translators tend to use communicative translation when they translate a source text. These source texts include news reports, technology documents, official documents, informative slogans in the public occasion, the popular novels, the common established by the people through long social practice and the well-known analogies. But sometimes, in order to reflect the source test’s unique charm, preserve the author’s personal style, enrich Chinese vocabularies and make translation fresh and powerful, we will choose semantic translation. Undoubtedly, the cases such as the authoritative quotations, dramatic and fresh analogies should be applied of semantic translation.Let us see some instances of semantic translation and communicative translation.Example 1: Wet Paint!Semantic translation: 湿油漆!Communicative translation:油漆未干,请勿触摸!Analysis: The source text is the slogan in the public occasion. Whenwe use semantic translation, we convey the message of the slogan but the translation does not have the same effect as the slogan. Then ,let us pay attention to communicative translation. It can be seen that communicative translation evidently conveys the meaning and the warning.Example 2: Great minds think alike.Semantic translation: 杰出的思想大致相同。