从王佐良《论读书》的译文看英语散文的翻译
论读书王佐良译文翻译及原文
论读书王佐良译文翻译及原文
【最新版】
目录
1.论读书的重要性
2.王佐良译文的特点
3.原文翻译的优点
4.对比王佐良译文与原文的差异
5.总结论读书的观点
正文
读书对于人类的重要性是不言而喻的。
阅读不仅可以拓宽我们的视野，丰富我们的知识，还可以提升我们的思维能力和审美品位。
在这方面，王佐良的译文为我们提供了一个很好的阅读体验。
王佐良的译文以其流畅、准确和生动的文字，为我们展现了原文的韵味和深意。
他不仅准确理解了原文的含义，还将其巧妙地转化成了中文，使得读者在阅读的过程中既能理解原文的含义，又能感受到中文的美。
原文的翻译也有其优点。
它保留了原文的语言风格和表达方式，使得读者能够更直观地了解到原文的文化背景和历史背景。
同时，原文翻译也提供了另一种阅读体验，让读者在阅读中能够体验到两种语言的差异和魅力。
对比王佐良的译文和原文，我们可以发现两者之间的差异。
译文在语言表达上更加流畅，更符合中文的表达习惯，而原文则在语言风格和文化背景上更具有独特性。
这两种方式都有其优点，为我们提供了不同的阅读体验。
总的来说，论读书的观点在王佐良的译文中得到了很好的体现。
阅读不仅能够拓宽我们的视野，丰富我们的知识，还能够提升我们的思维能力
和审美品位。
培根《论读书》三种译文及英文原文
【原文】Of Studies——Francis Bacon Studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability. Their chief use for delight, is in privateness and retiring; for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment and disposition of business. For expert men can execute, and perhaps judge of particulars, one by one; but the general counsels, and the plots and marshalling ofaffairs come best from those that are learned.To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament is affection; to make judgment wholly by their rules is the humor of a scholar. They perfect nature and are perfected by experience: for naturalabilities are like natural plants, that need pruning by study, and studies themselves do give forth directions too much at large, except they be bounded in by experience.Crafty men contemn studies, simple men admire them, and wise men use them, for they teach not their own use; butthat is a wisdom without them and above them, won by observation. Read not to contradict and confuse; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider.Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed,and some few to be chewed and digested; that is some booksare to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously; and some few to be ready wholly, and with diligence and attention. Some books also may be read by deputy and extracts made of them by others; but that would be only in the less important arguments, and the meanersort of books; else distilled books are, like common distilled waters, flashy things.Reading makes a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man. And therefore, if a man write little, he had need have a great memory; if he confer little, he had need have a present wit; and if he read little, he had need have much cunning to seem to know that he doth not.Histories make men wise; poets witty; the mathematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend.Abeunt studia in mores. Nay there is no stond or impediment in the wit, but may be wrought out by fit studies: like as diseases of the body may have appropriate exercises. Bowling is good for the stone and reins; shooting for the lungs and breast; gentle walking for the stomach; riding for the head; and the like. So if a man’s wit be wandering, let him study the mathematics; for in demonstrations, if his wit be called away never so little, he must begin again. If his wit be not apt to distinguish or find differences, let him study the schoolmen; for theyare cymini sectores. If he be not apt to beat over matters, and to call up one thing to prove and illustrate another, let him study the lawyers’ cases. So every defect of the mind may have a special receipt.谈读书——王佐良译读书足以怡情，足以博彩，足以长才。
论读书王佐良译文翻译及原文
论读书王佐良译文翻译及原文读书是人类进步的阶梯，而翻译则是传播知识的桥梁。
在学习与传播的过程中，文献翻译功不可没。
在小说、诗歌及其他文学作品翻译领域中，良好的翻译不仅要忠实于原文的内容，还要将其精神与意境完美地传达出来。
本文将以王佐良对读书的翻译及原文进行论述。
鲁迅先生曾说：“认真地读一本书，就是在和著者精神交谈。
”读书的翻译就是在与作者对话的过程中，将其所想所写准确而生动地传述给读者。
王佐良是一位在文学翻译领域颇负声誉的译者，他的翻译作品极大地丰富了中国读者的阅读体验。
就在2021年，王佐良翻译并出版了英国作家乔治·奥威尔的《1984》。
这本翻译版以其精准的译文和流畅的表达方式广受好评。
在这部小说中，王佐良不仅准确地译出了原文的意思，还充分考虑到了中国读者的文化背景和阅读习惯。
他掌握了作者的情感和意图，并将其完整地传达给了读者。
王佐良的翻译工作虽然在这本小说中只是语言的转换，但他成功地将奥威尔的思想和情感传达给了中国读者，为读者搭建了一座跨越时空和文化的桥梁。
在其他文学翻译领域，王佐良的翻译功力同样值得称道。
他翻译过的《红与黑》、《简爱》、《呼啸山庄》等经典著作也都广受欢迎。
他的翻译语言优美、准确，并且忠实于原文的风格与特点。
通过王佐良的翻译，读者可以更好地理解和欣赏这些世界文学作品的内涵和艺术魅力。
然而，对于一个翻译者来说，选择合适的译文也是一项挑战。
在进行文学翻译时，翻译者需要全面了解原文的语言、风格和文化特点。
王佐良在选择和翻译文学作品时，注重在原文的基础上增加其翻译的可读性，并在尊重原著的前提下，适当增添或删减一些内容，以使译文更适合目标读者。
他的翻译作品不仅保留了原文的风格和内涵，还结合了中国读者的口味和阅读习惯，为读者提供了一种贴近他们生活经验的阅读体验。
当然，作为一位杰出的译者，王佐良的翻译工作并非完美无缺。
在某些时候，由于文化差异或其他原因，完全忠实于原文可能无法满足目标读者的需求。
论读书(英汉对照)
Of Studies论读书Francis Bacon 弗朗西斯培根王佐良译文版Studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability. Their chief use for delight, is in privateness and retiring; for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment and disposition of business.读书足以怡情，足以傅彩，足以长才。
其怡情也，最见于独处幽居之时；其傅彩也，最见于高谈阔论之中；其长才也，最见于处世判事之际。
For expert and execute, and perhaps judge of particulars, one by one; but the general counsels, and the plots and marshalling of affairs, come best from those that are learned.To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament, is affectation; to make judgement wholly by their rules, is the humour of a scholar.练达之士虽能分别处理细事或一一判别枝节，然纵观统筹，全局策划，则舍好学深思者莫属。
读书费时过多易惰，文采藻饰太盛则矫，全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
They perfect nature, and are perfected by experience: for natural abilities are like natural plants, that need proyning (pruning) by study; and studies themselves do give forth directions too much at large, except they be bounded in by experience.读书补天然之不足，经验又补读书之不足，盖天生才干犹如自然花草，读书然后知如何修剪移接，而书中所示，如不以经验范之，则又大而无当。
培根美文《论读书》原文及三种译文鉴赏
培根美文《论读书》原文及三种译文鉴赏阅读是我们获取知识的重要手段，下面是培根着名的关于读书的一篇美文——论读书，并奉上另外两个版本的译文。
对于好的书，可以多加研读，对于普通书籍，知其大意即可，就像在快速阅读中，阅读是弹性的，你可以选择对内容把握程度的深浅。
“有些书可以浅尝辄止，有些书可以生吞，而有少数书应该细嚼慢咽，融会贯通”——谈读书——王佐良译读书足以怡情，足以博彩，足以长才。
其怡情也，最见于独处幽居之时；其博彩也，最见于高谈阔论之中；其长才也，最见于处世判事之际。
练达之士虽能分别处理细事或一一判别枝节，然纵观统筹、全局策划，则舍好学深思者莫属。
读书费时过多易惰，文采藻饰太盛则矫，全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
读书补天然之不足，经验又补读书之不足，盖天生才干犹如自然花草，读书然后知如何修剪移接；而书中所示，如不以经验范之，则又大而无当。
有一技之长鄙读书，无知者慕读书，唯明智之士用读书，然读书并不以用处告人，用书之智不在书中，而在书外，全凭观察得之。
读书时不可存心诘难作者，不可尽信书上所言，亦不可只为寻章摘句，而应推敲细思。
书有可浅尝者，有可吞食者，少数则须咀嚼消化。
换言之，有只须读其部分者，有只须大体涉猎者，少数则须全读，读时须全神贯注，孜孜不倦。
书亦可请人代读，取其所作摘要，但只限题材较次或价值不高者，否则书经提炼犹如水经蒸馏，淡而五味矣。
读书使人充实，讨论使人机智，笔记使人准确。
因此不常做笔记者须记忆特强，不常讨论者须天生聪颖，不常读书者须欺世有术，始能无知而显有知。
读史使人明智，读诗使人灵秀，数学使人周密，科学使人深刻，论理学使人庄重，逻辑修辞之学使人善辩：凡有所学，皆成性格。
人之才智但有滞碍，无不可读适当之书使之顺畅，一如身体百病，皆可借相宜之运动除之。
滚球利睾肾，射箭利胸肺，慢步利肠胃，骑术利头脑，诸如此类。
如智力不集中，可令读数学，盖演算须全神贯注，稍有分散即须重演；如不能辨异，可令读经院哲学，盖是辈皆吹毛求疵之人；如不善求同，不善以一物阐证另一物，可令读律师之案卷。
培根《论读书》三种译文及英文原文
【原文】Of Studies——Francis Bacon Studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability. Their chief use for delight, is in privateness and retiring; for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment and disposition of business. For expert men can execute, and perhaps judge of particulars, one by one; but the general counsels, and the plots and marshalling of affairs come best from those that are learned.To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament is affection; to make judgment wholly by their rules is the humor of a scholar. They perfect nature and are perfected by experience: for natural abilities are like natural plants, that need pruning by study, and studies themselves do give forth directions too much at large, except they be bounded in by experience.Crafty men contemn studies, simple men admire them, and wise men use them, for they teach not their own use; but that is a wisdom without them and above them, won by observation. Read not to contradict and confuse; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider.Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested; that is some books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously; and somefew to be ready wholly, and with diligence and attention. Some books also may be read by deputy and extracts made of them by others; but that would be only in the less important arguments, and the meaner sort of books; else distilled books are, like common distilled waters, flashy things.Reading makes a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man. And therefore, if a man write little, he had need have a great memory; if he confer little, he had need have a present wit; and if he read little, he had need have much cunning to seem to know that he doth not.Histories make men wise; poets witty; the mathematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend.Abeunt studia in mores. Nay there is no stond or impediment in the wit, but may be wrought out by fit studies: like as diseases of the body may have appropriate exercises. Bowling is good for the stone and reins; shooting for the lungs and breast; gentle walking for the stomach; riding for the head; and the like. So if a man’s wit be wandering, let him study the mathematics; for in demonstrations, if his wit be called away never so little, he must begin again. If his wit be not apt to distinguish or find differences, let him study the schoolmen; for they are cymini sectores. If he be not apt to beat over matters, and to call up one thing to prove andillustrate another, let him study the lawyers’ cases. So every defect of the mind may have a special receipt.谈读书——王佐良译读书足以怡情，足以博彩，足以长才。
培根美文《论读书》原文及三种译文鉴赏
培根美文《论读书》原文及三种译文鉴赏阅读就是我们获取知识的重要手段,下面就是培根著名的关于读书的一篇美文——论读书,并奉上另外两个版本的译文。
对于好的书,可以多加研读,对于普通书籍,知其大意即可,就像在快速阅读中,阅读就是弹性的,您可以选择对内容把握程度的深浅。
“有些书可以浅尝辄止,有些书可以生吞,而有少数书应该细嚼慢咽,融会贯通”——谈读书——王佐良译读书足以怡情,足以博彩,足以长才。
其怡情也,最见于独处幽居之时;其博彩也,最见于高谈阔论之中;其长才也,最见于处世判事之际。
练达之士虽能分别处理细事或一一判别枝节,然纵观统筹、全局策划,则舍好学深思者莫属。
读书费时过多易惰,文采藻饰太盛则矫,全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
读书补天然之不足,经验又补读书之不足,盖天生才干犹如自然花草,读书然后知如何修剪移接;而书中所示,如不以经验范之,则又大而无当。
有一技之长鄙读书,无知者慕读书,唯明智之士用读书,然读书并不以用处告人,用书之智不在书中,而在书外,全凭观察得之。
读书时不可存心诘难作者,不可尽信书上所言,亦不可只为寻章摘句,而应推敲细思。
书有可浅尝者,有可吞食者,少数则须咀嚼消化。
换言之,有只须读其部分者,有只须大体涉猎者,少数则须全读,读时须全神贯注,孜孜不倦。
书亦可请人代读,取其所作摘要,但只限题材较次或价值不高者,否则书经提炼犹如水经蒸馏,淡而五味矣。
读书使人充实,讨论使人机智,笔记使人准确。
因此不常做笔记者须记忆特强,不常讨论者须天生聪颖,不常读书者须欺世有术,始能无知而显有知。
读史使人明智,读诗使人灵秀,数学使人周密,科学使人深刻,论理学使人庄重,逻辑修辞之学使人善辩:凡有所学,皆成性格。
人之才智但有滞碍,无不可读适当之书使之顺畅,一如身体百病,皆可借相宜之运动除之。
滚球利睾肾,射箭利胸肺,慢步利肠胃,骑术利头脑,诸如此类。
如智力不集中,可令读数学,盖演算须全神贯注,稍有分散即须重演;如不能辨异,可令读经院哲学,盖就是辈皆吹毛求疵之人;如不善求同,不善以一物阐证另一物,可令读律师之案卷。
论读书两种译文翻译赏析
论读书两种译文翻译赏析《论读书》翻译赏析班级：姓名:学号：confer little, he had need have a present wit: and if he read little, he had need have much cunning, to seem to know, that he doth not. Histories make men wise; poets witty; the mathematics subtitle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend. Abeunt studia in mores.Nay, there is no stand or impediment in the wit, but may be wrought out by fit studies; like as diseases of the body, may have appropriate exercises. Bowling is good for the stone and reins; shooting for the lungs and breast; gentle walking for the stomach; riding for the head; and the like. So if a man's wit be wandering, let him study the mathematics; for in demonstrations, if his wit be called away never so little, he must begin again. If his wit be not apt to distinguish or find differences, let him study the Schoolmen; for they are cymini sectors. If he be not apt to beat over matters, and to call up one thing to prove and illustrate another, let him study the lawyers' cases. So every defect of the mind may have a special receipt.《论读书》弗朗西斯·培根王佐良译读书足以怡情, 足以博采, 足以长才。
从英汉对比的角度赏析文学作品的翻译_以王佐良_论读书_译文为例
安徽科技学院学报,2008,22(4):70～73Journal of Anhui Science and Technol ogy University从英汉对比的角度赏析文学作品的翻译———以王佐良《论读书》译文为例余 涛(安徽科技学院 外国语学院,安徽 凤阳 233100)摘 要:本文分析了英国十六世纪文学家培根的《论读书》的文体特征,简要介绍了我国翻译家王佐良的译学主张,并重点从词法包括名词、介词和代词及句法包括形合与意合、省略与重复方面分析了王佐良译文的特点。
关键词:词法;句法;形合与意合;省略与重复中图分类号:H315.9 文献标识码:B 文章编号:1673-8772(2008)04-0070-04Appreci a ti on of L iterary W ork’s Transl ati on fro mthe Angle of English and Chi n ese Contrast———Take W ang Zuoliang’s Versi on of O n Reading as an Examp leY U Tao(College of Foreign Languages,Anhui Science and Technol ogy University,Fengyang233100,China) Abstract:This paper analyses the stylistic characteristics of O n reading,which was written by the B ritish writer Francis Bacon in16th century.It intr oduces briefly a Chinese translat or,W ang Zuoliang’s translati on theory and f ocus on his translati characteristics fr om the as pects of mor phol ogy,including nouns,p repositi ons,p r onouns and syntax,including hypotaxis and paratactic,om issi on and repetiti on.Key words:Mor phol ogy;Syntax;Hypotaxis and paratactic;Om issi on and repetiti on翻译的第一要旨是“信”。
从王佐良《论读书》译文风格看英汉翻译的“动态对等论”
奈达与德瓦尔 （ ｅＷａ） Ｄ ｒ 合著的《 一种语言到另一种语 言 ： 从
论圣经翻译 中的功能对等》 一书 中把“ 动态对 等” 改为 “ 功能 对等 ” Ｆ ｎｔ ｎｌ ｑ ｉａ ｎｅ 。而功能 对等更 突显 出的是 （ ｕ ｃｏ ａ Ｅ ｕｖｌ ｃ ） ｉ ｅ 翻译 的语用与 交际功 能 Ｊ 。奈 达定 义 的原文是 ：ｒｎｌｔ ｇ Ｔａｓ ｉ ａｎ
奈 达 （ ｕｅｅＡ ｉａ 翻译 理 论 中最 为 人 们 熟 悉 的 ， Ｅ ｇｎ ．Ｎｄ ） 就
说理推 向高潮 ， 因此它不愧是一篇经世致用 的传世之作。 王佐 良先生凭着对英汉语言特 点独到的把握 ， 能从整体 的行文风格 中把握全 局。从 “ 动态 对等 论 ” ， 看 王先生 的译
所 谓形合 （ ｙｏａｉ） 指 “ ｈｐｔ实现词语或句子的连接” 所 谓意合 （ ａａ ｘｓ ， “ ； ｐ ｒ ａｉ） 指 不 ｔ
“ 态对等 论” 动 理论基础
“ 动态对等 ” 翻译 是奈 达 的最 主要 的 翻译 观。他认 为 ，
借 助语 言形 式手段而 借助词语 或句子 的意义和逻辑联 系实
佐 良的《 论读 书》 文做 文本 解读 ， 译 并主要从 句法结构 、 修辞风格 、 翻译 策略 （ 归化与异化 ） 节奏韵律 四个角 、
度来探讨翻译 中的动态对等 。 关键词 ： 态对等论 ； 动 句法结构 ； 辞风格 ； 修 翻译策略； 节奏韵律 中图分类号 ： ０９ Ｈ ５ 文献标识码 ： Ａ 文章编号 ：０ ８— ６ １ ２ １ ） １ ００ ０ １０ ４ ８ （０ １ ０ — １８— ２
现它们 之间的连接 ” Ｊ 口 。因此 ， 结构和 形式常能把英 语的注
意形合体现出来 ， 而功 能和意义 则是汉语 常用的连接 手段 ，
培根美文论读书原文及三种译文鉴赏
培根美文论读书原文及三种译文鉴赏培根美文《论读书》原文及三种译文鉴赏阅读是我们获取知识的重要手段，下面是培根着名的关于读书的一篇美文——论读书，并奉上另外两个版本的译文。
对于好的书，可以多加研读，对于普通书籍，知其大意即可，就像在中，阅读是弹性的，你可以选择对内容把握程度的深浅。
“有些书可以浅尝辄止，有些书可以生吞，而有少数书应该细嚼慢咽，融会贯通”——谈读书——王佐良译读书足以怡情，足以博彩，足以长才。
其怡情也，最见于独处幽居之时；其博彩也，最见于高谈阔论之中；其长才也，最见于处世判事之际。
练达之士虽能分别处理细事或一一判别枝节，然纵观统筹、全局策划，则舍好学深思者莫属。
读书费时过多易惰，文采藻饰太盛则矫，全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
读书补天然之不足，经验又补读书之不足，盖天生才干犹如自然花草，读书然后知如何修剪移接；而书中所示，如不以经验范之，则又大而无当。
有一技之长鄙读书，无知者慕读书，唯明智之士用读书，然读书并不以用处告人，用书之智不在书中，而在书外，全凭观察得之。
读书时不可存心诘难作者，不可尽信书上所言，亦不可只为寻章摘句，而应推敲细思。
书有可浅尝者，有可吞食者，少数则须咀嚼消化。
换言之，有只须读其部分者，有只须大体涉猎者，少数则须 Document number：NOCG-YUNOO-BUYTT-UU986-1986UT全读，读时须全神贯注，孜孜不倦。
书亦可请人代读，取其所作摘要，但只限题材较次或价值不高者，否则书经提炼犹如水经蒸馏，淡而五味矣。
读书使人充实，讨论使人机智，笔记使人准确。
因此不常做笔记者须记忆特强，不常讨论者须天生聪颖，不常读书者须欺世有术，始能无知而显有知。
读史使人明智，读诗使人灵秀，数学使人周密，科学使人深刻，论理学使人庄重，逻辑修辞之学使人善辩：凡有所学，皆成性格。
人之才智但有滞碍，无不可读适当之书使之顺畅，一如身体百病，皆可借相宜之运动除之。
滚球利睾肾，射箭利胸肺，慢步利肠胃，骑术利头脑，诸如此类。
从培根《论读书》和王佐良译本中看英汉翻译技巧
翻译技巧
• 词类转移法 Conversion 在翻译时，由于两种语言在语法和习惯表达上的差异，在保 证原文意思丌变的情况下，译文必须改变词类，这就叨做词 类转换法。
• 例如：（1）Their chief use for delight, is in privateness and retiring;for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment,and disposition of business.（名词-劢词） 译文:其怡情也,最见于独处幽居之时;其傅彩也,最见于高谈阔论之 中;其长才也,最见于处世判事之际。 • 例如：(2) Studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability.（名-劢） 译文:读书足以怡情,足以傅彩,足以长才。
因此在英汉互译中，要经常变换语态，以使译文符合习惯用 法，显得地道而自然。
• 例1.They perfect nature, and are perfected by experience: for natural abilities are.....and studies themselves do give forth directions too much at large, except they be bounded in by experience. 译文:读书补天然之丌足,经验又补读书之丌足，盖天生才干.... 而书中所示，如丌以经验范之,则又大而无当。 • 例2.Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested; that is, some books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously; and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention. 译文:书有可浅尝者,有可吞食者,少数则须咀嚼消化。换言之,有 叧须读其部分者,有叧须大体涉猎者,少数则须全读,读时须全 神贯注,孜孜丌倦。
《论读书》原文及其两个译文之翻译批评
ａ ｔ ｔ ｅ ｎ ｔ ｉ ｏ ｎ， ｅ ｘ ｔ ｒ ａ ｃ ｔ ｓ， ｃ ｏ ｎ ｆ ｅ ｒ ｅ ｎ ｃ ｅ等等 。 这
英 国散 文家 弗 朗 西斯 ・ 培根 （ Ｆ ｒ ａ ｎ ｃ ｉ ｓ 视觉上的均衡 美。译文 比较 ：
Ｂ ａ ｃ ｏ ｎ ｌ ５ ６ ｌ — ｌ ６ ２ ６ 卜 生 写下 了不 少著作 ， 其
张婕 ／ 汕尾职业技术学院 摘 要： 翻译批 评是一种 审美活动 。 对译文进行鉴 别赏析就是对其进行 审美。 笔者根据 王宏印老师提 出的文 学翻译批评操 作程 序 ６步骤对 弗朗西斯 ・ 培根 所著 的 Ｏｆ Ｓ ｔ ｕ ｄ ｉ ｅ ｓ及其 两个译本进行翻 译批 评。 通过对 比分析后 ， 笔者得 出译文之 于原 文的神 似程度与 译 文所使 用的语 言有很 大关 系。
字， 原是“ 判断 ” 之意 ， 并不含有攻击破坏
１ ９ ８ ０年 出版 ， 以下简称 王译 ） 及曹 的意思 。 判 断有两层 步骤 一 判与断。 判者 的译文 （ 乃 分辨选择的功夫 ，断者乃等级价值之确 明伦 的译文 （ ２ ０ ０ ０年 出版 ，以 下简 称曹 定。 其判 断的标准乃 固定普 遍的， 期判断之 译 ） 。王佐 良先 生的译 本使 用了浅 近的文
关键词 ： 翻译批评 ； 审美 ； 比较 据 梁实秋先生 的考证 ， 希 腊文 “ 批评 ”
一
二、 研读译 作 本文选了两个版 本的译文 ，即王佐 良
使人敏锐 ， 笔记则可使人严谨 ； 王译 使用“ ……使 … … ・ ・ 使 … … 一 使 … …” 而营译使 用 “ … …可 使 …… ， …… 可使 …… ， ……则可使 ……。” 读起 来王译
（ １ ） Ｓ ｔ ｕ ｄ ｉ ｅ ｓ ｓ ｅ ｒ ｖ ｅ ｆ ｏ ｒ ｄ ｅ ｌ ｉ ｇ ｈ ｔ ，ｆ ｏ ｒ ｏ ｒ 一 些词让人觉得 高雅 、 庄严 、 正式 。 译文 比较 ：
浅谈从王佐良《论读书》的译文看英语散文的翻译
浅谈从王佐良《论读书》的译文看英语散文的翻译（作者:___________单位: ___________ : ___________）论文关键词：论读书语言结构特征语言的表情功能信息功能美感功能祈使功能论文摘要：本文以王佐良先生《论读书》的译文为例，分析了在英语散文汉译时语言及结构特征的归化，以及对语言的表情功能、信息功能、美感功能，以及祈使功能的传达。
散文是一种独特的文学体裁，其选材范围广泛，结构自由灵活，表现手法多样，语言不受韵律的拘束。
在文体特征上，散文不拘泥于固定的形式，但却往往又以其结构上潜在的层次感和语言的生动简洁来打动读者的心扉；在语言功能上，散文往往具备表情功能、信息功能、美感功能，以及祈使功能。
基于散文的以上特点，将英语散文译成汉语时，译文应完整地再现原文的结构特点，达到与原文相似的功能，使译文的意义完整，语言流畅，地道。
下文中，笔者将以我国著名的翻译家王佐良先生对英国哲学家培根的“Of Studies”的译文《论读书》为例，简要论述英语散文汉译时应该注意的问题。
一、英语散文汉译时语言及结构特征的归化总体而言，王佐良先生的译文与原文是句句对应，有的句子根据汉语语法特点汉语进行了相应的调整，另一些句子则根据汉语的表达习惯而相应调整了语序，从而使译文流畅自然。
例如：Studies serve for delight，for ornament，and forability.读书足以怡情，足以博采，足以长才。
上述译文中，三个介词被译成了三个动词，三个并列的介词短语因此也成了三个动词短语。
这样译文符合汉语的层层推进的叙事方法及多用动词的语言特征。
又如：To spend too much time in studies is sloth：touse them too much for ornament，is affection：to makejudgment wholly by their rules， is the humor of ascholar.读书费时过多易惰，文采藻饰太盛则矫，全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
(完整word版)论读书两种译文翻译赏析
《论读书》翻译赏析班级：姓名:学号：Of Studiesby Francis BaconStudies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability. Their chief use for delight is in privateness and retiring; for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment and disposition of business. For expert men can execute, and perhaps judge of particulars, one by one; but the general counsels, and the plots and marshalling of affairs, come best, from those that are learned. To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament is affectation; to make judgment wholly by their rules, is the humor of a scholar. T hey perfect nature, and are perfected by experience: for natural abilities are like natural plants, that need pruning, by study; and studies themselves, do give forth directions too much at large, except they be bounded in by experience. Crafty men contemn studies, simple men admire them, and wise men use them; for they teach not their own use; but that is a wisdom without them, and above them, won by observation. Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested; that is, some books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously; and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention. Some books also may be read by deputy, and extracts made of them bothers; but that would be only in the less important arguments and the meaner sort of books, else distilled books are like common distilled waters, flashy things.Reading makes a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man. And therefore, if a man write little, he had need have a great memory; if he confer little, he had need have a present wit: and if he read little, he had need have much cunning, to seem to know, that he doth not. Histories make men wise; poets witty; the mathematics subtitle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able tocontend. Abeunt studia in mores.Nay, there is no stand or impediment in the wit, but may be wrought out by fit studies; like as diseases of the body, may have appropriate exercises. Bowling is good for the stone and reins; shooting for the lungs and breast; gentle walking for the stomach; riding for the head; and the like. So if a man's wit be wandering, let him study the mathematics; for in demonstrations, if his wit be called away never so little, he must begin again. If his wit be not apt to distinguish or find differences, let him study the Schoolmen; for they are cymini sectors. If he be not apt to beat over matters, and to call up one thing to prove and illustrate another, let him study the lawyers' cases. So every defect of the mind may have a special receipt.《论读书》弗朗西斯·培根王佐良译读书足以怡情, 足以博采, 足以长才。
论读书王佐良译文翻译及原文
论读书王佐良译文翻译及原文译文：读书能够令人愉悦，让人拥有光彩，增长才干。
它最大的益处是在人们独处幽居的时候。
在人们高谈阔论的时候，它也显示着它的光彩。
而它最能滋长才华的地方则是在人们处理事务和判断事理的时候。
尽管处世经验丰富的人能分别处理繁杂琐碎的事情，也能明察秋毫，但若论统筹兼顾、全盘策划，则非好学深思者莫属。
读书费时过多易惰，文采藻饰太盛则矫，全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
读书虽不能补充人性的不足，但经验又不能补充读书的不足。
天生的才干如同自然的花草一样，需要借助读书来修剪移栽；而书中所学所得则必须经由观察检验才能融会贯通，否则便会大而无当。
拥有某种技能的人往往轻视读书，无知的人羡慕读书，唯有明智之士善于运用读书得来的知识，然而读书并不以用处告人，用书之智不在书中，而在书外，全凭观察得之。
读书时不可存心诘难作者，不可尽信书上所言，亦不可只为寻章摘句，而应推敲细思。
书有可浅尝者，有可吞食者，少数则须咀嚼消化。
换言之，有只须读其部分者，有只须大体涉猎者，少数则须全读，读时须全神贯注，孜孜不倦。
书亦可请人代读，取其所作摘要，但只限题材较次或价值不高者，否则书经提炼犹如水经蒸馏，淡而无味矣。
读书使人充实，讨论使人机智，笔记使人准确。
因此不常做笔记者须记忆特强，不常讨论者须天生聪颖，不常读书者须欺世有术，始能无知而显有知。
读史使人明智，读诗使人灵秀，数学使人周密，科学使人深刻，论理学使人庄重，逻辑修辞之学使人善辩：凡有所学，皆成性格。
人之才智但有滞碍，无不可读适当之书使之顺畅，一如身体百病皆可借相宜之运动除之。
滚球利睾肾，射箭利胸肺，慢步利肠胃，骑术利头脑，诸如此类。
如智力不集中可令读数学盖演算须全神贯注稍有分散即须重演；如不能辨异可令读经院哲学盖是辈皆吹毛求疵之人；如不善求同不善以一物阐证另一物可令读律师之案卷。
如此头脑中凡有缺陷皆有特药可医。
原文：Reading is sufficient to water the mind, to give it color and depth, and to endow it with the power of winging its way through the world. Its value in the retirement and silent hours of thought, and in the need of quick invention, and of being able to meet the crash of the world in a thoroughly off-hand manner, has been already insisted on. A trained person may deal with intricate details or consider various factors with ease; but a general outlook, a connexion, a sort of指挥-in-chief, is the prerogative of those who have had their minds watered by reading.It is a mistake to think that we can get all we want out of books. Evening the score by observation is what is wanted. Books are the best of things provided we use them at the right time and in the right way. It is not books that are to the mind what food is to the body. It is the mind that is to the books what the stomach is to the food. Food is for the body, and books are for the mind. Just as every meal does not fill, so every book is not a banquet.You must choose. You cannot digest every dish that is set before you. A little will serve you; or a great deal, if you can digest it. Some minds are like the seed ground in April showers; they need no deliberate culture, but grow into strong habits of thought in exactly the same way as certain great flowers are trained to fill the Some minds are like the seed ground in April showers; they need no deliberate culture, but grow into strong habits of thought in exactlythe same way as certain great flowers are trained to fill the same space. These natures will go on drawing nourishment from the same kind of food all their lives. They are not the versatile, protean types who, like Proteus, can change their shape every hour. They are not the adventurous spirits who have a passion for new food and strange dishes. They will never feel at home in new surroundings, or be ready at a moment's notice to start on a journey round the world. They are the stay-at-homes, the householders, the men and women of settled and habits of thought. Others, again, are like those acquisitive minds that hanker after everything that is going, thattaste one subject after another, and cannot sit still for a moment. You find them all over the place. They have not settled convictions or principles. They cannot be said to have a character. You may find one who is learned in the literature of all countries, who knows Greek and Latin, and can repeat a passage from Homer or Virgil in one breath, and go on to discuss the last new play or novel of the day in the next. They have read everything, and remember it all; but they are like those who get their living by robbing Peter to pay Paul; they are without a home.It is better to be one of these last than one of the first kind. Theversatile types who read all subjects indifferently may start with a wide range of subjects and an equally wide range of acquirements; but they are likely to peter out in the end into incomplete half-knowledge, which is as useless as if it were ignorance.You must choose. You cannot digest every dish that is set before you. A little will serve you; or a great deal, if you can digest it. The commonest sort of readers are those who read in order to know about things. The second commonest sort read for amusement or for a sort of vicarious life. The third commonest sort read for the sake of the light that reading throws upon life and upon human nature. These last do not find life unworthy of attention: but some among them are disappointed that it cannot be recommended to every one. "Is this all?" they say. "Is this what life is worth? Shall I make no more of it than this?"The answer is that every man should make what he can of life, and that some will make more than others; and that none should be quite sure that he has done so very much, or be too sure that he has done very little. And this also is true: that there is no subject so unpromising that you cannot find something in it worth knowing or doing; and there is no subject so promising that you can ever know or do all that is to be known or done about it. The bookish life, like everything else, has its moments of delusion, when you fancy you have found the philosopher's stone, or something else of equal value; but also it has its moments of sanity, when you are content to know that you have found enough.。
从英汉语法状态对比分析《论读书》的原文和王佐良的译文
从英汉语法状态对比分析《论读书》的原文和王佐良的译文作者：张中华来源：《校园英语·上旬》2015年第01期【摘要】英汉对比是一个庞大的课题，既包括语言的对比也包括文化的对比。
本文将选取《论读书》的原文与王佐良的译本，从英汉语法状态的角度进行对比分析，从而加深对两种不同语言的理解。
【关键词】对比静态与动态抽象与具体被动语主动一、引言《论读书》全文从用词角度看简洁、古雅，而且使用了大量庄严，文雅的词以及正式用语。
整篇文章多用排比句式，语气连贯，逻辑严密。
文中还出现大量的被动语态。
从整体讲，句式结构较简单，但其语言属于早期现代英语，措辞与句法与现代英语稍有不同。
这些加深了这篇散文的翻译难度。
王佐良的《论读书》译文简洁精练、生动形象、韵律优美、寓意深刻。
用词上，措辞精练、端重、典雅，同时又考虑到文章的音韵形式，采用汉语的双音节字、文言字、四字结构词、文言虚词等来满足原文的古雅特色。
该译本体现了原文的风格，堪与培根的原文媲美。
二、从英汉语法状态的角度对比分析原文和译文1.静态与动态。
英汉语法状态呈现静态与动态的差别。
英语多用名、介词，动词的弱化和虚化等，因而叙述呈静态；汉语多用动词，动词词组充当句子各种成分，动词的重复等，因而叙述呈动态。
例1：Studies serve for delight，for ornament，and for ability.译文：读书足以怡情，足以傅彩，足以长才。
原文使用了三个名词：delight，ornament，ability。
而王佐良的译文用了三个文雅的动词短语：怡情，博彩，长才。
这样既符合汉语的表达习惯，也同样用了简洁的词把原文的那种古雅之风表现出来了。
例2：Their chief use for delight，is in privateness and retiring；for ornament，is in discourse；and for ability，is in the judgment and disposition of business.译文：其怡情也，最见于独处幽居之时；其傅彩也，最见于高谈阔论之中；其长才也，最见于处世判事之际。
Of-Studies-王佐良先生译文(英汉对照)
第6页，共9页。
And therefore, if a man write little, he had need have a great memory; 因此不常作笔记者须记忆特强， if he confer little, he had need have a present wit; 不常讨论 者须天生聪颖，
and if he read little, he had need have much cunning, to seem to know, that he doth not. 不常读书者须欺世有 术，始能无知而显有知。 Histories make men wise; poets witty; the mathematics subtitle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend. Abeunt studia in mores. 读史使人明智，读诗 使人灵秀，数学使人周密，科学使人深刻，伦理学 使人庄重，逻辑修辞之学使人善辩：凡有所学，皆 成性格。
第4页，共9页。
Read not to contradict and confute驳斥; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. 读书时不可存心诘难作者，不 可尽信书上所言，亦不可只为寻章摘句，而应推敲 细思。 Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested; 书有可浅尝者，有可吞食者，少数则须咀嚼消化。 that is, some books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously （carefully）; and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention. 换言之，有只须读其部分者，有只须大体涉猎者， 少数则须全读，读时须全神贯注，孜孜不倦。
论读书翻译赏析白话文
论读书翻译赏析白话文阅读是我们获取知识的重要手段，下面是培根著名的关于读书的一篇美文——论读书，同时还为大家带来了翻译。
Of Studies——Francis BaconStudies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability. Their chief use for delight, is in privateness and retiring; for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment and disposition of business. For e_pert men can e_ecute, and perhaps judge of particulars, one by one; but the general counsels, and the plots and marshalling of affairs come best from those that are learned.To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament is affection; to make judgment or of a scholar. They perfect nature and are perfected by e_perience: for natural abilities are like natural plants, that need pruning by study, and studies themselves do give forth directions too much at large, e_cept they be bounded in by e_perience.Crafty men contemn studies, simple men admire them, and en use them, for they teach not their o and above them, e books are to be tasted, others to be se fee books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously; and some fee books also may be read bydeputy and e_tracts made of them by others; but that portant arguments, and the meaner sort of books; else distilled books are, like common distilled akes a full man; conference a ready man; and an. And therefore, if a man emory; if he confer little, he had need have a present uch cunning to seem to knoake men athematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend. Abeunt studia in mores. Nay there is no stond or impediment in the ay be ay have appropriate e_ercises. Boach; riding for the head; and the like. So if a man’s study the mathematics; for in demonstrations, if his ust begin again. If his study the schoolmen; for they are cymini sectores. If he be not apt to beat over matters, and to call up one thing to prove and illustrate another, let him study the laind may have a special receipt.谈读书——王佐良译读书足以怡情，足以，足以长才。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
大 众 文 艺大摘要：本文以王佐良先生《论读书》的译文为例，分析了在英语散文汉译时语言及结构特征的归化，以及对语言的表情功能、信息功能、美感功能，以及祈使功能的传达。
关键词：论读书；语言；结构特征；语言的表情功能；信息功能；美感功能；祈使功能Abstract: On the basis of the study of Wang Zuoliang’s Chinese translation of “Of Studies”, this essay analyzes the domestication of English language and structure as well as transmission of various functions of language, such as function of expression, information, aestheticism and imperativeness when translated into Chinese.Key words: Of Studies; language; structure; function of expression; function of information; function of aestheticism; function of imperativeness散文是一种独特的文学体裁，其选材范围广泛，结构自由灵活，表现手法多样，语言不受韵律的拘束。
在文体特征上，散文不拘泥于固定的形式，但却往往又以其结构上潜在的层次感和语言的生动简洁来打动读者的心扉；在语言功能上，散文往往具备表情功能、信息功能、美感功能，以及祈使功能。
基于散文的以上特点，将英语散文译成汉语时，译文应完整地再现原文的结构特点，达到与原文相似的功能，使译文的意义完整，语言流畅，地道。
下文中，笔者将以我国著名的翻译家王佐良先生对英国哲学家培根的“Of Studies”的译文《论读书》为例，简要论述英语散文汉译时应该注意的问题。
一、英语散文汉译时语言及结构特征的归化总体而言，王佐良先生的译文与原文是句句对应，有的句子根据汉语语法特点汉语进行了相应的调整，另一些句子则根据汉语的表达习惯而相应调整了语序，从而使译文流畅自然。
例如：Studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability.读书足以怡情，足以博采，足以长才。
上述译文中，三个介词被译成了三个动词，三个并列的介词短语因此也成了三个动词短语。
这样译文符合汉语的层层推进的叙事方法及多用动词的语言特征。
又如：To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament, is affection; to make judgment wholly by their rules, is the humor of a scholar.读书费时过多易惰，文采藻饰太盛则矫，全凭条文断事乃学究故态。
原文前部分“To spend too much time in studies is sloth”是用不定式做主语。
译文照顾到汉语语言习惯，用“读书”作主语。
这既忠实地表达了原文的意义，又符合散文的朴素风格和中文简练明快的特点，原文的后部分“is the humor of a scholar”巧妙地运用“学究故态”将英语的静态特点转化成汉语的动态特点。
下面一句译文也十分精彩：They prefect nature ,and are perfected by experience: for natural abilities are like natural plants that need pruning by study; and studies themselves, do give forth directions too much at large; except they be bounded in by experience.读书补天然之不足，经验又补读书之不足，盖天生才干犹如自然花草，读书然后知如何修剪移接；而书中所示，如不以经验范之，则又大而无当。
原文中的冒号被译文中的逗号代替，原文中的总分结构也被汉语的连动结构代替。
这样使译文更符合汉语表达的特点。
译文又巧妙地将原文中的“except they be bounded in by experience”译为主动语态，突出体现了汉语的语言特点。
这里，我们不得不赞叹王佐良先生驾驭英汉两种语言的能力。
二、英语散文汉译时对原文语言功能的传达散文作为一种独立的文学体裁，往往具备表情功能、信息功能、美感功能及祈使功能等语言功能。
因此，在英语散文汉译时，我们不仅要尽最大的努力保留原作所具有的语言特征，而且要尽力传达原作的各种语言功能。
1．译文对原文表情功能的传达语言的表情功能体现在它能够改变接受者的情绪状态，能够激发人内心深处的各种情感。
散文的表情功能就在于它往往能够以简洁易懂的语言引起读者的共鸣。
在翻译中，语言的表情功能的传达致关重要，它直接关系到译文的成败。
培根的“Of Studies”是公认的劝学名篇，因此译文也应具有同样的功能，在这一点上，王佐良先生很好地完成了他作为译者的任务，使《论读书》成了中国所独特的劝学名篇。
2．译文对原文信息功能的传达语言的信息功能即运用简练的语言,将自己的思想传达给读者,使读者可以更好地理解文章的思想内容。
在散文翻译中，对于原文中晦涩或较难理解的句子，译文应在保持语言顺畅前提下，给予适当解释或说明，从而保证其对原文信息功能的传达。
如下面“Of Studies”中的句子：Abeut studia in mores.凡有所学，皆成性格。
原文比较难以理解，王佐良先生将其翻译成汉语推崇的四字结构，既保留了原文古雅的风格，同时也道明了句子潜在的意义，达到了对原文信息功能的传达。
3．译文对原文美感功能的传达语言的美感功能就是通过精心构思的语言,给读者以美好的享受。
接受美学理论认为,文学作品是注定为读者而创作的。
因此，经过再创作的译文也是为读者服务的，应该将读者的接纳、欣赏和评判作为其生存的依据和标准。
散文的特殊性决定其翻译是目标取向策略(target-oriented strategy)。
也就是说,译者在忠实地传达原作意图的基础上,应侧重译文的读者效应, 除了考虑其所包含的语言和文化信息,更要注重其语用功能,即语言应能提示给予读者以美的享受。
因此, 翻译散文时, 除应忠实传达原文的语言和文化信息,更应考虑读者的期待视野、审美情趣和接受能力。
如《论读书》中，以下句子的翻译，就完整地保留了原文的美感功能。
Studies serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability.读书足以怡情，足以博采，足以长才。
4．译文对原文祈使功能的传达语言的祈使功能是指其对接受者行为的影响功能。
这一功能可由命令或劝告来达成，但是通常更有效的途径是恰当的解释，有启发的玩笑，或者是一个发人深省的提问，它的使用常常暗示某种权威。
在翻译中，我们要特别注意对原文的这种语气，也即语言的祈使功能的保留。
如在培根的“Of Studies”中，有如下句子：Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe从王佐良《论读书》的译文看英语散文的翻译黄 绚 (重庆师范大学 外国语学院 重庆 400030)（下转102页）语言研究大 众 文 艺大提起杨宝忠先生，一般梨园行的内外人士可能首先想到的是“京胡圣手”这一雅号。
其实，杨宝忠先生在改习场面之前，就已经是红遍全国的著名余派老生了。
杨宝忠还是余叔岩先生正式收徒的大弟子，在他学余有所成就之后，也分别在物克多公司和胜利公司录制了一些唱片。
而这些唱片的灌制时期，正是他嗓音较好的时期。
现在这些唱片的录音也仍然留传在世，研究和爱好余派唱腔的朋友们也非常喜爱聆听这些录音资料。
这些录音，虽然相比于孟小冬先生留下的遗音不够丰富，但是却很好地体现了余派早期的演唱风格，恰好能与孟小冬先生的一些录音对比，相信听者有心，可以从中获取很多感悟与启发。
下面，笔者就简单谈谈对于这几张老唱片录音的一些认识。
【珠帘寨•解宝】“太保传令把队收”和“昔日有个三大贤”两段。
这两段唱腔可与孟小冬先生的这两段吊嗓儿录音进行对比。
杨宝忠所学的余派的早期风格和孟小冬所学的余派的晚期风格区别很大，很多地方旋律有差别。
另外余叔岩先生在灌制“昔日有个三大贤”的唱片时，由于容量所限，删去的两句原板的词句对后世的影响甚大。
在杨宝忠和孟小冬的唱片以及后来杨宝森的演出中，删去的两句也都不存在了。
【南阳关•城楼】“恨杨广斩忠良谗臣当道”一段，从导板起，一直唱到[扫头]。
这段唱腔可与孟小冬先生的半截吊嗓儿录音对比。
显然，孟小冬的唱法细腻了很多，杨宝忠的唱法显得简约一些。
其实，杨宝忠的这种唱法难度大了很多，后面的快板部分顿挫有力，充分体现了余派的中锋嗓儿，提留劲儿的唱法。
学唱者如果不能准确把握擞儿和气口，后面唱的肯定是白水一样。
【庆顶珠•杀家】“恼恨那吕子秋为官不正”和“恨奸贼不由我心中冒火”两段唱腔。
这两段唱儿的劲头很难掌握，但是杨宝忠先生唱散板时却充分展示了余派的韵味，尺寸非常精准，让人听来回味无穷。
学唱者若想有如此这般的演唱水平，必须要把音准包括附点烂熟于心。
另外，这段唱词与现在通常见到的《打渔杀家》的唱词出入较大，故而把唱词抄录如下：恼恨那吕子秋为官不正，欺压我三江口贫穷的良民。
上公堂原被告一言不问，责打我四十板就赶出了头门。
没奈何咬牙关忙往家奔，叫一声桂英儿你快来开门。
恨奸贼不由我心中恼火，心儿里一阵阵咬碎牙窝。
那赃官凭势力欺压于我，今夜晚过江去将尔杀却。
恨不得生双翅越江而过，我的儿你为何撒了蓬索？啊，我的儿啊！【乌龙院•闹院】宋江出场的几段四平调。
这种唱腔绝对是余派的准词，与一般的唱词都不同。
余叔岩先生特别强调过“大堂上打鼓退了堂”，而不能是“大老爷打罢了退堂鼓”，因为宋江本人并不打鼓，而是衙役打鼓。
后来亦有人为了统一“江阳辙”，唱作：“大老爷打鼓退了堂，衙前来了我宋江。
” 另外，这出戏虽往往是当成了做派戏，但是剧中的唱腔并不少，非嗓音优秀者不可胜任。
【御碑亭•休妻】“王有道提笔泪难忍”一段。
这一段对比贯大元先生的老唱片，风格十分接近。
但是再对比孟小冬先生说戏的录音，差距又很明显。
可见余派早期风格和晚期风格对于细微之处的处理是不同的，应该说晚期更加平和中正，早期显得挺拔俊俏，尤其是体现在西皮的唱腔风格之中。