供应商评审指南

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

潜在供应商评价指南

评估范围

A – Management

管理

B - Technology and Development

技术与开发

C – Quality

质量

D – Production

生产

E - Engineering (Product and Process)

工程(产品和过程)

F - Logistics / Supply

物流与供应

G - Sub-supplier Management

分供商管理

H - Cost Management

成本管理

Scoring Guide打分指南

Team evaluation must be recorded into Excel file. Input comments on COMMENTS page. 团队评价必须用Excel文件记录,在注释页上输入注释。

Points Color Definition Effect on DC processes

在DC流程颜色表示的定义:

0 red Supplier demonstrates neither a documented process/procedure nor an applied practice.

0分红色供应商示范既无文件化流程/程序,又无应用的实例

Process will certainly cause product failure and/or unsatisfactory communication with the customer

过程肯定会发生产品缺陷和招致顾客抱怨。

1 red Documented process/procedure exists but is incomplete or not fully implemented.

1分红色有文件化流程/程序,但不完善或没有完全的贯彻。

Process will probably cause product failure and/or unsatisfactory communication with the customer

过程大概会发生产品缺陷和招致顾客抱怨。

2 green Process/procedure is completely documented and acceptably implemented.

2分黄色流程/程序是完整的并备有证明文件,贯彻情况可以接受。

Process will probably not cause any product failure and/or unsatisfactory communication with the customer 过程大概不会发生产品缺陷和招致顾客抱怨。

3 green A completely documented process/procedure is fully implemented and meets minimum requirements. 3分绿色具有完整的备有证明文件流程/程序,并得到完全地贯彻。

According to the evaluation team’s expertise the process will not cause any product failure and/or unsatisfactory communication with the customer

依照评估团队专家的意见,过程不会发生产品缺陷和顾客抱怨。

N/A green N/A项绿色

The evaluation team agrees that this question should not be scored. Enter NA into the Score box and explain reasons on COMMENTS page.

评估团队同意不记分的这些问题,记分箱内输进NA,并在注释页解释原因。

Question is not applicable for this particular commodity/process

对于特殊的商品/过程,问题不适用。

Note The team must reach a consensus on each question score.

注意:每一项问题的打分,团队必须达成一致意见。

A – Management/管理

Comments:注解:

The Management (e. g. Board of Management, Plant Management, Section Management) develops the quality policy for the company, defines it and commits all areas and levels to it. This allows specific quality goals and also a quality system (Q system) to be agreed upon. Quality must be regarded as an overall

management task. The management must concern itself with the following subjects:

提交并详细说明所有范围、级别的公司经营(例如:管理部门、工厂管理、项目管理)发展的质量方针。允许已经同意的特殊目标和质量体系。质量必须当作一项全面的经营任务。经营必须涉及它自身具有的如下题目:∙ Business Plan* 商业计划

∙ Comparison of internal & external performance data

国内外性能资料对照

∙ Business results

商业成果

∙ Employee satisfaction

员工满意

∙ Customer satisfaction

客户满意

“Management” describes the organizational entity in the company that is responsible for profit and loss.

管理层描述在公司内负责利润和消耗的组织实体。

Remark: * = Business plan means: local plant performance targets

注,商业计划意味着:当地的工厂执行目标

Checklist Overview:

1 Have goals been defined and are they consistently being followed?

是否制定目标,并且始终遵循?

1a Does the supplier have process to update their business Plan?

供应商是否有更新商业计划的流程?

1b Are objectives developed from the business plan?

所有目标是否都源于商业计划?

2 Is there a process for management review?

否有管理评审流程?

2a Are objectives defined and controlled on all levels?

是否界定和控制所有等级的目标?

2b Does the supplier perform regularly scheduled quality audits internally?

供应商是否实施定期的内部质量评审?

2c Do preventive and reactive measures derive from this evaluation?

是否有针对评审(结果)的纠正和预防措施?

3 Is there a process for evaluating the capability of the established resources (employees, equipment, methods, material)?

是否有流程来评估已经建立的资源能力(如人员、设备、方法和材料)?

3a Does the organization identify and allocate appropriate resources for increase of customer satisfaction? 为提高顾客满意度,组织是否识别和分配适当的资源?

4 Is there a process for the management of employee satisfaction with suitable methods?

相关文档
最新文档