震撼世界的审判
合集下载
相关主题
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
1.The author 2.background 3.The affair
4.conflicts
5.result
Part one: General introduction
4.Conflicts of characters
Clarence Darrow (counsel, William Jennings Bryan lawyer)) （orator、statesman） Malone John Butler (farmer) (Catholic, counsel) Tom Stewart Hays VS (lawyer ,attorney-general) (Jew ,counsel) 12 jurors(陪审团成员), George Rappelyea three had never read any (engineer) book Kirtley Mather except the Bible. (Professor, scientist) One couldn't read
4.Conflicts f view points
⒈Accepted the theory advanced by Charles Darwin——all animal life had evolved from a common ancestor. ③ ⒉The reason why John Scopes was accused is ignorance and bigotry are VS rampant.⒀ ⒊ If so no one would dare to bring any intelligence and enlightens and culture to the human mind.⒁ ⒋The truth is eternal And needs no human agency to support it.(24) ⒈They are adhere to a literal interpretation of the Old Testament(圣约书)③ ⒉Man came from above.(20)
Part two: Details about this passage
1、Main idea
John Scopes was a young high-school science teacher and football coach in Dayton, a little town in Tennessee, where fundamentalism were strong .He was accused of breaking the anti-evolution law and was brought to court, because of teaching his students evolution. The renowned criminal lawyer Clarence Darrow helped him defend, and William Jennings Bryan was the leading counsel for the prosecution. Thousands of people came to visit, and a group of scientists and professors helped to testify Scope’s behalf. The trial began on July 10th, 1925, and lasted for 3 days. On the first day, the preliminary fight appears to be.
Part two: Details about this passage
2、 Style of the text
① Narration
• To narrate is to given an account of an event or series of events. In other words, a narrative recreates an event or gives a sense of it by helping the audience visualize the event.
1. The author 2.background 3.The affair
4. conflicts
5.results
Part one: General introduction
3. About the affair
Reason: John Scopes taught the students evolution which was considered against the law. Time: July 10,1925 Place: A court in Dayton,Tennessee.
7.Why the authors say the trial rocked the world?
⒈Hot Media attention: For the first time in history to broadcast a jury trial, More than 100 reporters were on hand, and even radio announcers.(2), and 22 telegraphers were sending out 165,000 words a day on the trial. (28) ⒉Many people came to see: For fear that the old court’s floor might collapse under the weight of the throng, the trial was resumed outside under the maples.(29) ⒊It snowballed into one of the most famous trials in U.S. history.
Part two: Details about this passage
2、Language features:
Sarcasm, ridicule & irony • Irony is a subtle form of humor which involves saying things that you do not mean. • If you ridicule someone or ridicule their ideas or beliefs, you make fun of them in an unkind way. • Sarcasm is usually intended to mock or insult someone.
1. The author 2.background
3.About the affair
4.conflicts
5.result
Part one: General introduction
2. background
• ⑴For a number of years a clash had been building up between the fundamentalist(基要主义者) and the modernists(现代主义者). (3) • ⑵fundamentalism was strong in Tennessee, and the state legislature had passed a law prohibiting the teaching of “any theory that • denies the story of creation as taught in the Bible” • ⑶The exits of Darwin’s evolution. • ⑷John Scopes taught the students evolution.
The trial That Rocked the World
-----John Scopes
From group two
Content
Part one：General introduction
1.About the author 2. Background 3. About the affair 4.Conflicts 5. Result 6.Influences 7.Why the author say the trial rocked the world?
1.The author
2.background
3.The affair
4.conflicts
5.result
Part one: General introduction
6.Influences
• Since the trial, the schools and legislative offices of the United States have deeply affected, and the intellectual and academic freedom has grown. Based on the trial the business man made a great profit. (10, 26)
Part two: Details about this passage
1、Main idea
On the second day, the prosecution calling witness against Scopes. Darrow and Bryan go on the heated debate. The climax of the trial is that Darrow succeeded in pointing out several serious inconsistencies in Fundamentalist belief when Darrow was called as a witness for the defense. On the third day, the verdict came out and scopes was convicted and fined 100 dollars. It shows that the trial was seen as a victory for evolution.
John Scopes (1900——1970) once a school-teacher in Dayton, Tennessee. Principal(首要参与者) of the “Monkey Trial". Later became a geologist for an oil company.
⒊”The Bible” is not going to be driven out from this court by experts.(21)
Part one: General introduction
5. Result
The trail turned to be a “victorious defeat”.The verdict was guilty. John Scopes was fined 100dollars and costs. He was offered his teaching job back but he declined and he got scholarship to the University of Chicago.
Part two: Details about this passage 1) Main idea 2) Style of the text 3) Rhetorical Devices 4)Comments
Part one: General introduction
1.About the author:
4.conflicts
5.result
Part one: General introduction
4.Conflicts of characters
Clarence Darrow (counsel, William Jennings Bryan lawyer)) （orator、statesman） Malone John Butler (farmer) (Catholic, counsel) Tom Stewart Hays VS (lawyer ,attorney-general) (Jew ,counsel) 12 jurors(陪审团成员), George Rappelyea three had never read any (engineer) book Kirtley Mather except the Bible. (Professor, scientist) One couldn't read
4.Conflicts f view points
⒈Accepted the theory advanced by Charles Darwin——all animal life had evolved from a common ancestor. ③ ⒉The reason why John Scopes was accused is ignorance and bigotry are VS rampant.⒀ ⒊ If so no one would dare to bring any intelligence and enlightens and culture to the human mind.⒁ ⒋The truth is eternal And needs no human agency to support it.(24) ⒈They are adhere to a literal interpretation of the Old Testament(圣约书)③ ⒉Man came from above.(20)
Part two: Details about this passage
1、Main idea
John Scopes was a young high-school science teacher and football coach in Dayton, a little town in Tennessee, where fundamentalism were strong .He was accused of breaking the anti-evolution law and was brought to court, because of teaching his students evolution. The renowned criminal lawyer Clarence Darrow helped him defend, and William Jennings Bryan was the leading counsel for the prosecution. Thousands of people came to visit, and a group of scientists and professors helped to testify Scope’s behalf. The trial began on July 10th, 1925, and lasted for 3 days. On the first day, the preliminary fight appears to be.
Part two: Details about this passage
2、 Style of the text
① Narration
• To narrate is to given an account of an event or series of events. In other words, a narrative recreates an event or gives a sense of it by helping the audience visualize the event.
1. The author 2.background 3.The affair
4. conflicts
5.results
Part one: General introduction
3. About the affair
Reason: John Scopes taught the students evolution which was considered against the law. Time: July 10,1925 Place: A court in Dayton,Tennessee.
7.Why the authors say the trial rocked the world?
⒈Hot Media attention: For the first time in history to broadcast a jury trial, More than 100 reporters were on hand, and even radio announcers.(2), and 22 telegraphers were sending out 165,000 words a day on the trial. (28) ⒉Many people came to see: For fear that the old court’s floor might collapse under the weight of the throng, the trial was resumed outside under the maples.(29) ⒊It snowballed into one of the most famous trials in U.S. history.
Part two: Details about this passage
2、Language features:
Sarcasm, ridicule & irony • Irony is a subtle form of humor which involves saying things that you do not mean. • If you ridicule someone or ridicule their ideas or beliefs, you make fun of them in an unkind way. • Sarcasm is usually intended to mock or insult someone.
1. The author 2.background
3.About the affair
4.conflicts
5.result
Part one: General introduction
2. background
• ⑴For a number of years a clash had been building up between the fundamentalist(基要主义者) and the modernists(现代主义者). (3) • ⑵fundamentalism was strong in Tennessee, and the state legislature had passed a law prohibiting the teaching of “any theory that • denies the story of creation as taught in the Bible” • ⑶The exits of Darwin’s evolution. • ⑷John Scopes taught the students evolution.
The trial That Rocked the World
-----John Scopes
From group two
Content
Part one：General introduction
1.About the author 2. Background 3. About the affair 4.Conflicts 5. Result 6.Influences 7.Why the author say the trial rocked the world?
1.The author
2.background
3.The affair
4.conflicts
5.result
Part one: General introduction
6.Influences
• Since the trial, the schools and legislative offices of the United States have deeply affected, and the intellectual and academic freedom has grown. Based on the trial the business man made a great profit. (10, 26)
Part two: Details about this passage
1、Main idea
On the second day, the prosecution calling witness against Scopes. Darrow and Bryan go on the heated debate. The climax of the trial is that Darrow succeeded in pointing out several serious inconsistencies in Fundamentalist belief when Darrow was called as a witness for the defense. On the third day, the verdict came out and scopes was convicted and fined 100 dollars. It shows that the trial was seen as a victory for evolution.
John Scopes (1900——1970) once a school-teacher in Dayton, Tennessee. Principal(首要参与者) of the “Monkey Trial". Later became a geologist for an oil company.
⒊”The Bible” is not going to be driven out from this court by experts.(21)
Part one: General introduction
5. Result
The trail turned to be a “victorious defeat”.The verdict was guilty. John Scopes was fined 100dollars and costs. He was offered his teaching job back but he declined and he got scholarship to the University of Chicago.
Part two: Details about this passage 1) Main idea 2) Style of the text 3) Rhetorical Devices 4)Comments
Part one: General introduction
1.About the author: