PRAGMATICS
第六张语用学pragmatics
第六张语用学pragmatics Chapter 6pragmatics一、定义1.语境Context The notion of context is essential to the pragmatic study of language,it's generally considered as constituted by the knowledge shared by the speaker and the hearer.2.言语行为理论Speech act theory It's an important theory in the pragmatic study of language.it's aphilosophical explanation of the nature of linguistic communication.it aims to answer the question"what do we do when using language?"The concept of causatives performatives,the locutionary act,the illocutionary act,the perlocutionary act and the5categories of illocutionary act suggested and formulated by J.R.Searle constitute the speech act theory.3.叙述句Constatives Constatives are statements that either state or describe,and are thus verifiable and it bearing the truth-value.;4.行为句Performatives Performatives are sentences that did not state afact or describe astate,and are not verifiable.5.言内行为Locutionary Act Alocutionary act is the act ofuttering words,phrases,clauses.it's the act of conveying literal meaning by means of syntax,lexicon and phonology.6.言外行为Illcotionary Act An illocutionary act is the act of expressing the speaker's intention it's the act performed in saying something.7.言后行为Perlocutionary Act Perlocuationary Act is the act performed by or resulting from saying something.it's the consequence of,or the change brought about by the utterance.8.句子意义Sentence meaning It refers to asentence and is agrammatical concept,the meaning of asentence is often studied as the abstract intrinsic property of the sentence itself in terms of predication.9.话语意义Utterance meaning It refers to asentence as what people actually utter in the course of communication,it becomes and utterance and it should be considered in the situation in which it is actually uttered.10.合作原则Cooperative Principle It's proposed and formulated by P.Grice,a pragmatic hypothesis,is about that the participants must first of all be willing to cooperate,otherwise,it would not be possible for them to carry on the talk.11.会话含义Conversational implicatures According to P.Grice,it refers to the extra meaning not contained in thutterance,understandable to the listener only when he shares the speaker's knowledge or knows why and how he violates intentionally one of the four maxims of the CP.话语的言外之义是说话人通过故意违反某一准则而获得这种听者能懂的暗含之意。
6.Pragmatics 简明英语语言学 戴炜栋
extralinguistic context
context of situation
time & space of the communication subject of communication formality of communication
relationship of participants
b. The patient is lying in bed when the nurse comes in. the window is open. The patient says: It’s cold in here.
Within context, the two utterances have different meanings. In (a), Cecilia most probably suggests, “let’s leave here and find a warmer place”, while in (b), the patient is suggesting to the nurse: “Close the window please”.
knowledge about the language
linguistic context
knowledge about the linguistic environment
common sense
Context
background knowledge social-cultural conventions speech conventions
linguistic and contextual
knowledge
knowledge
Semantics
pragmatics英语解释
Pragmatics is a subfield of linguistics that studies how context and social factors contribute to meaning in language. It looks at how language is used in real-life situations and how it can be interpreted beyond its literal or grammatical meaning. Pragmatics also examines howmunicative acts are performed and understood, including the role of speaker intentions, assumptions, and presuppositions inmunication.1. Definition of PragmaticsPragmatics is the study of how context influences the interpretation of language. It focuses on the use of language inmunication, taking into account the speaker's intentions, the context of the conversation, and the social and cultural factors that may impact meaning. Unlike semantics, which deals with the literal meaning of words and sentences, pragmatics looks at the implied or inferred meaning of language in use.2. Key Concepts in Pragmaticsa. Speech ActsOne of the central concepts in pragmatics is speech acts, whichrefers to the actions performed by speakers through their utterances. These actions can include making requests, giving orders, making promises, or expressing opinions. Speech acts are not just about the words themselves, but also the intentions and effects behind them.b. Grice's MaximsGrice's conversational maxims are another important concept in pragmatics. These maxims, proposed by philosopher H.P. Grice, outline the principles that guide cooperativemunication. They include the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner, which suggest that speakers should be informative, truthful, relevant, and clear in theirmunication.c. ImplicatureImplicature refers to the inferred meaning that arises from an utterance, beyond its literal meaning. The study of implicature is central to the understanding of how context and pragmatic principles affect the interpretation of language. For example, when someone says "It's cold in here," the implicature might be a request to close a window or turn up the heat.3. Applications of PragmaticsPragmatics has implications for various areas of language use, including language teaching, cross-culturalmunication, and discourse analysis.a. Language TeachingIn language teaching, an understanding of pragmatics is crucial for learners to effectively use language in real-world situations. Teaching pragmatics involves helping learners understand the appropriate use of language in different contexts and how to interpret the implied meanings and intentions inmunication.b. Cross-Cultural CommunicationPragmatics also plays a significant role in cross-culturalmunication. Different languages and cultures may have varying pragmatic norms and conventions, leading to potential misunderstandings or mimunications. By understanding the pragmatic differences between languages, individuals can navigate cross-cultural interactions more effectively.c. Discourse AnalysisIn discourse analysis, pragmatics is used to examine how language is used to achievemunicative goals in different contexts. This includes studying the patterns of interaction, power dynamics, and politeness strategies in discourse, as well as how context influences the interpretation of language in specific settings.4. Challenges and Controversies in PragmaticsDespite its importance, pragmatics also faces several challenges and controversies in its study. These include issues related to the cultural and context-specific nature of pragmatic meaning, the difficulty of establishing universal pragmatic principles, and the role of pragmatics in language processing and understanding.a. Cultural and Context-Specific NatureOne challenge in pragmatics is the recognition of the cultural and context-specific nature of pragmatic meaning. Differentcultures may have unique norms and conventions formunication, leading to variations in pragmatic interpretation. This makes it difficult to establish universal rules for pragmatic understanding.b. Universal Pragmatic PrinciplesAnother controversial issue is the search for universal pragmatic principles. While some scholars argue for the existence of cross-linguistic and cross-cultural pragmatic principles, others emphasize the diversity and variability of pragmatic norms across languages and cultures. This ongoing debate reflects theplexity of studying pragmatics on a global scale.c. Pragmatics and Language ProcessingThe relationship between pragmatics and language processing is another area of contention. Some researchers argue that pragmatics is an essentialponent of language understanding, while others m本人nt本人n that it is secondary to the processing of grammatical and semantic information. Resolving this issue has implications for the study ofmunication disorders and the development of natural language processing systems.5. ConclusionIn conclusion, pragmatics offers valuable insights into theplex nature of language use and interpretation. By examining the role of context, social factors, and speaker intentions inmunication, pragmatics enhances our understanding of how language works in the real world. Despite the challenges and controversies it faces, the study of pragmatics continues to be an important and dynamic field within linguistics, with implications for language teaching, cross-culturalmunication, and discourse analysis. As we strive to better understand the multifaceted nature of language andmunication, pragmatics rem本人ns a crucial area of investigation.。
语言学知识_语用学
语用学一.语用学(Pragmatics)的定义:语用学是用以研究语言使用者如何使用句子成功进行交际的学问。
语用学(Pragmatics)与语义学(Semantics)虽然都涉及对语言意义的研究,但是语义学(Semantics)只是将语言视作一个独立的系统来研究,而语用学(Pragmatics)则是将语言置于语境(context)之中。
所以,语用学(Pragmatics)与语义学(Semantics)本质区别在于是否将语境(context)因素纳入考量范围之内。
二.句子意义与话语意义(Sentence Meaning Vs. Utterance Meaning):1) 句子意义(Sentence Meaning):句子意义指的是独立于语境的句子本身所传达的字面意义。
2)话语意义(Utterance Meaning):话语意义指的是将句子的意义置于特定语境中以表达言者某种意图的意义。
三.指示现象(Deixis):指示现象指的是说话人利用语言形式表达说话内容所涉及的人员、事物、时间、地点等方面。
指示现象是连接语言形式及其发生语境的桥梁。
指示语主要分为以下三类:1)人称指示语(person deixis):用于表达言语交际的参与者。
2)空间指示语(spatial deixis):用于指代言语活动中所涉及的人、物或事的相对位置。
3)时间指示语(temporal deixis):用于表达言语交际活动中的时间点和时间段。
四.言语行为理论(Speech Act Theory):1) 约翰·奥斯汀(John Austin)的言语行为模式:英国哲学家约翰·奥斯汀(John Austin)于20世纪50年代提出的言语行为模式区分了言有所述(constative)和言有所为(performative)。
随后,他又对原先的理论进行了发展,放弃了言有所述(constative)和言有所为(performative)的区分,发展出了新的言语行为模式。
06Chapter 6_pragmatics
Pragmatics
6.1Introduction
to Pragmatics 6.2Micropragmatics 6.3Macropragmatics
6.1Introduction to Pragmatics
6.1.1 Definitions of pragmatics 6.1.2 Context
24
Ex: A. where is the fresh salad sitting? B. He is sitting by the door. A: May I borrow your Shakespeare? B: Sure, It‟s on the shelf. Names of things people Names of people thing Speakers calculate how much information their hearers need to make successful references, and where they can, they economize. inference
Father: Daughter:
We don‟t DO that. I KNOW, Daddy.
You don‟t WEAR dresses.
16
(A little boy comes in the front door.) Mother: wipe your feet, please. He removes his muddy shoes and socks and carefully wipes his clean feet on the doormat.
14
A: Are you going to the seminar? B: It’s on linguistics.
《英语语言学导论》(第四版)课件Chapter 7 Pragmatics
world; 3) the relationships between linguistic forms and the users of
Contents
1 Introduction to Pragmatics 2 Deixis and Reference
3 Speech Acts 4 Pragmatic Presupposition
5 The Cooperative Principle and Implicature
6
Apply PP to teaching in future Politeness
7.2.6 Social deixis
the encoding of social distinctions, or the use of deictic expressions to indicate social status of the interlocutors
● honorifics e.g. tu/vous (in French) du/sie (in German) nǐ/nín (in Chinese)
--- the addressees being audio-visually present during the utterances to be able to understand these expressions
e.g. I like that one, not this one.
7.2 Deixis and reference
Chapter 6 pragmatics 语言学整理的资料
Chapter 61.pragmatics:自测:Pragmatics treats the meaning of language as something intrinsic and inherent. (T/F)术语:pragmatics语用学解释:语用学处理的是语言的实际意义,是在应用中的意义,而不是固有的意义。
术语:Pragmatics can be defined as the study of how speakers of a language use sentences to effect successful communication. 语用学是研究某一语言的言者是如何利用句子成功进行交际的。
解释:Pragmatic analysis of meaning is first and foremost concerned with the study of what is communicated by a speaker/writer and interpreted by a listener/reader. Analysis of intentional meaning necessarily involves the interpretation of what people do through language in a particular context. Intended meaning may or may not be explicitly expressed. Pragmatic analysis also explores how listeners/readers make inferences about what is communicated.语用学对意义的研究主要关注的是说者或作者要交流的是什么,听者或读者读到的是什么。
并且根据语境分析要表达的意义。
语言学--Pragmatics ppt课件
15
ppt课件
• Speech acts is a term derived from the work of the philosopher J. L. Austin (1962) and now used to refer to a theory which analyzes the role of utterances in relation to the behavior of the speaker and the hearer in interpersonal communication. It aims to answer the question “What do we do when using language?”
12
ppt课件
6.2.3 Anaphora
• You need to know: definition of anaphora, antecedent, anaphor indirect anaphora and direct anaphora
13
ppt课件
6.2.4 Presupposition
• a. Can I look at your Shakespeare? • b. Sure, it’s on the shelf over there. • You need to know • inference: process • reference: the act
9ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
ppt课件
6.2.2 Deixis
• You need to know: definition of deixis five types of deixis
10
ppt课件
definition of deixis
新编语言学教程chapter 6 pragmatics (课堂PPT)
11
Direct anaphora (direct relation between the antecedent and the anaphor):
18
3.2 Constatives and performatives
• Constatives: statements, assertions and utterances like them; an utterance is used to state a fact or what the speaker believes to be a fact, or to describe state of affairs. e.g: She is a waitress. The characteristic property of a constative is that it can be assessed in terms of truth value.
the rest of social sience was/ wasn’t asleep. >> Chomsky was revolutionizing linguistics. • Cleft sentences It was/ wasn’t Henry that kissed Rosie. >> Somenone kissed Rosie. • Comparisons and contrasts Carol is/ isn’t a better linguist than Barbara. >> Barbara is a linguist.
Pragmatics 语用学简介
Pragmatics
6. 2 Violation of CP and Conversational Implicature
• • • Dear Sir, Mr X’s command of English is excellent, and his attendance at tutorials has been regular. Yours,
Lecture 8
Pragmatics
Passage 23 Pragmatics • Questions: • 1. What are the definition and purpose of pragmatics? • 2. What are the speech act principles? • 3. What is illocutionary force? And what is implicit and • explicit illocutionary force? • 4. What are the conversational principles? • 5. What decides the appropriateness of speech? • 6. Why are implicit illocutionary force, conversation • principles, and presuppositions important?
9. Over-informativeness and additional information 10. Conversation analysis 11. Pragmatics and foreign language learning 12. Literary pragmatics
英语语言学 语用学 Pragmatics
The essential distinction between semantics and pragmatics is whether the context of use is considered in the study of meaning.
6.1.2 pragmatics and semantics
related but different linguistic studies of meaning both study meaning
Semantics treats meaning as an abstract, self contained, intrinsic system, a property attached to language itself, which is not influenced by context.
研究语言使用者是如何使用句子成功进行交际 的
It is a discipline of studying meaning not in isolation, but in context.
Pragmatics: the study of linguistic acts and the contexts in which they are performed
因此在研究语义时是否考虑语境便成了传统语 义学和语用学的根本区别所在。
如 It is cold in here 这个句子,对传统语义学 家来说,只是表达了“某一地点气温比较低” 这样的命题内容。而对语用学家来说,除了陈 述一个客观的气温情况外,说话人很可能是为 了请听话人做点什么,如关上窗户、打开暖气、 借件衣服御寒等。
语言学_Chapter 6_Pragmatics
对所使用语言的掌握 语言知识
对语言上文的了解 百科全书式的知识(常识)
语境
背景知识
语言外知识 情景知识
特定文化的社会规范 特定文化的会话规则 交际的时间、地点 交际的主题 交际的正式程度 交际参与者的相互关系
相互知识Biblioteka • 1. Situational context
• • • •
refers to the particular spatiotemporal situation in which an utterance occurs the place and time of the utterance, the speaker and the hearer, the actions they are performing at the time, the various objects and events existent in the situation.
performed via utterances • 3 simultaneous act in a speech act
6.2.1 Austin’s model: Speech Acts (言语 行为理论)
Austin (1962) distinguish two categories of utterances.
Annie: Cats were very happy today.
I think Annie means “Cats eat the cream.” What does Annie mean? Cats today were in high spirit.
Both are right. It is the difference between sentence meaning and utterance meaning!
[研究生入学考试]语言学讲义考研 8 Pragmatics
Definition
• Pragmatics is generally the study of natural language understanding, and specifically the study of how context influences the interpretation of meanings. In another word it is the study of the relationship between symbols and their interpreters.
____ is the study of the relationship between symbols and their interpreters.
• • • • •
A. Syntax B. Semantics C. Pragmatics D. Sociolinguistics Answer: C
• Performantive & Constative • The theory of Illocutionary Act
Performative & Constative
• If the uttering of the sentences is a part of the doing of an action, the sentences are called performatives. And verbs like name are called performative verbs. • I name this ship the Queen Elizabeth. • I promise to finish it in time. • I apologize.
语用学概述
二、语用学的主要内容 目前语用学的主要内容大致有以下几个方面: 目前语用学的主要内容大致有以下几个方面:
1.概述 1.概述 2.语境 2.语境 3.指示语 3.指示语 4.言语行为 4.言语行为 5.语用原则 5.语用原则 6.预设 6.预设 7.会话含义 7.会话含义 8.关联论 8.关联论
思考与练习:
(2)研究听话人的理解:
Pragmatics is the study of how more gets communicated than is said. (Yule.1996:3) said. (Yule.1996: Pragmatics is the study of understanding intentional human action. (Green, 1996:2) action. 1996: Pragmatics, as a topic in linguistics, is the study of the use of context to make inferences about meaning. (Fasold, 1993) meaning. 1993)
(1)研究说话人的意义: 研究说话人的意义:
a) Pragmatics is the study of speaker meaning.(Yule.1996: meaning.(Yule.1996:3) b) Pragmatics is a theory which seeks to characterize how speaker use the sentences of a language to effect successful communication. communication. (Kempson, 1975:84) 1975:84) c) Pragmatics is the study of the ability of language users to pair sentences with the contexts in which they would be appropriate. appropriate. (Levinson,1983:24) (Levinson,1983:24)
语言学导论第6章Pragmatics
Speech act theories:
Austin’s model of speech acts Searle’s classification of speech acts Indirect speech acts
E.g.,
cultural background, situation (time, place, manner, etc.) the relationship between the speaker and the hearer …
Pragmatics vs. Semantics
Semantics: (no context) the study of the literal meaning of a sentence
How these linguistic objects are used?
Pragmatics: language use in context
Roughly: the study of how to do things with words
Generally: the study of how speakers of a language use sentences to effect successful communication
Indirect speech acts
Principle of conversation 会话原则
To converse with each other, the participants must first of all be willing to cooperate.
新编语言学教程chapter6pragmatics课堂
11
Direct anaphora (direct relation between the antecedent and the anaphor):
husband. >> Joan hadn 't been beating her husband. ? Iteratives The flying saucer came/ didn 't come again . >>The flying saucer came before.
15
? Temporal clauses
7
2.2 Deixis (p.144)
Deixis is the words and expressions whose reference depends entirely on the situational context of the utterance and can only be understood in light of these circumstances.
6
2. Micropragmatics (p.143) 2.1 Reference
The act by which a speaker or writer uses language to enable hearer or reader to identify something is called reference.
heads. >> There exists a man with two heads. ? Factive verbs John realized/ didn ' t realize that he was in debt. >>John was in debt.
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Why pragmatics?
Semantically, the two sentences are ambiguous both lexically and logically Occam’s razor/ eraser (Ziff, 1960) = entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity “nine” is ambiguous?
Pragmatics as Interdisciplinary
Sociolinguistics, Pcysholinguistics, Discourse Analysis Functional perspective Influence of verbal messages to people Linguistics and Philosophy Implicature Presupposition Speech acts Deixis
Why pragmatics?
Illustrations 1. John has had nine girlfriends. 1.1 John has had at least nine girlfriends. 1.2 John has had exactly nine girlfriends.
Why pragmatics?
3. wh-traces/variables Who do you love t?
Why pragmatics?
Types of Overt NPs 1. Lexical anaphors The composers admires themselves/each other. 2. Pronouns He is Italian enough to understand the culture, and yet foreign enough to see its peculiarities.
Illustrations of Linguistics Underdeterminacy Thesis
In sum: Pragmatics is necessary to fill the gap created by linguistics underdeterminacy.
Pragmatics has to be included as a component in an overall theory of linguistic ability.
Pronominal = a feature representation of an NP which may be referentially dependent but which must be free within such domain
Why pragmatics?
Four Types of NPs on the assumption that Anaphors and Pronominals are two independent binary features: 1. [+anaphor, - nominal] Overt: lexical anaphor Empty: NP-trace
Illustrations of Linguistics Underdeterminacy Thesis
2.1 The authorities barred the anti-globalization demonstrators because they advocated violence.
2.2 The authorities barred he anti-globalization demonstrators because they feared violence
Illustrations of Linguistics Underdeterminacy
1. You and you, but not you, stand up.
Analysis: The use of deictic expression “you” should be accompanied by physical behavior (gesture or eye contact) requires extralinguistic physical context
PRAGMATICS
Cecilia F. Genuino
What is pragmatics? p2
A systematic study of meaning by virtue of or dependent on the use of language A field of inquiry centered on implicature, presupposition, speech acts and deixis A study on the relation of signs to their users and interpreters (Levinson, 1983)
Why pragmatics?
2. Pragmatics provides contextual or real-world knowledge necessary to determine the speaker intended meaning through linguistic underdeterminacy thesis Linguistically encoded meaning of a sentence underdetermines the proposition expressed by the speaker when uttering a sentence
Why pragmatics?
3. Pragmatics can effect a radical simplification of other core components – semantics and syntax– in an overall theory of linguistic ability
Why pragmatics?
The conjunction of the assertion and the implicature = two sided: upper and lowerbounded reading, exactly nine girlfriends
Why pragmatics?
Biological, Psychological, Sociological Functions of signs
Pragmatics
Phenomenal Overlaps in Pragmatics
Sociolinguistics
MEANING
Pyscholinguistics
NeurolinguiStics
Why pragmatics?
Conversational Implicature The sentence asserts or entails the one-sided, lower-bounded reading “at least nine girlfriends” Conversationally implicates, the one-sided, upper-bounded reading “at most nine girlfriends”
4. They are cooking apples. 4.1 What are they doing in the kitchen? They are cooking apples.
4.2 What kind of apples are those? They are cookingaphor, + pronominal] Overt: Pronoun Empty : pro
3. [+anaphor, + pronominal] Overt: --Empty: PRO
Why pragmatics?
4. [-anaphor, -pronominal] Overt: name Empty: wh-trace/variable
Illustrations of Linguistics Underdeterminacy Thesis
Linguistic disambiguation is needed to determine the reference of the anaphoric “they” Background assumption is necessary
Why pragmatics?
Pragmatically, obtain the one-sided, lower-bound reading “at least nine girlfriends” derive the one-sided, upper-bounded “at most” reading using a pragmatic inference, CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE
Simplification of syntax 1. Two types of abstract features of anaphors based on Principles and Parameters Theory (Chomsky) and minimalist syntax: 1.1 Anaphor 1.2 Pronominal
Why pragmatics?
Types of Empty Categories: 1. NP Traces Susan’s brother was killed t in the Asian tsunami. 2. PROs John tried PRO to pass his driving test on the first attempt